Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THEMES:
Organised by:
and
ABOUT THE ORGANISERS
The National Law University, Jodhpur [“University”] is one of India’s top law schools. It was
established in 1999 as part of a vision of excellence in legal education through innovative methods
of learning. The diverse student body consists of some of the most meritorious students from the
country, selected on the basis of a competitive entrance examination. The teaching faculty
comprises both young and experienced academicians who have received their education at leading
universities in India, and have contributed to India’s growing body of legal academia.
The Centre for Advanced Research and Training in Arbitration Law [“CARTAL”] is established
by the University to promote research and scholarship in specialized fields of arbitration law. It
seeks to empower students with a theoretical and practical understanding of arbitration law by
providing a platform for academicians, professionals and law students to interact and discuss
contemporary issues in arbitration law. The mandate of CARTAL is achieved by the organization
of workshops, certificate courses and guest lectures to facilitate the understanding of such issues.
CARTAL also organises the reputed annual Gary B. Born Essay Competition on International
Arbitration and the annual CARTAL Conference on International Arbitration. For further
information, please see the report of the previous (fifth) edition of the conference, available here.
The Indian Journal of Arbitration Law (“IJAL”) is a bi-annual, open-access journal, published by
CARTAL. It is the leading Indian journal on arbitration law. While the ‘Indian’ in the name of the
journal indicates the source of publication, the journal itself has consistently focussed on topics of
global interest and relevance. IJAL has successfully published nine volumes and continues to host
contributions from globally renowned experts. All the articles from the journal’s archives are
available here. It is also available on Kluwer Arbitration, HeinOnline, WestLaw, and SCC Online.
For more information, please visit our website (ijal.in) or write to us at editors@ijal.in.
ABOUT THE COMPETITION
The Gary B. Born Essay Competition on International Arbitration encourages law students to
explore forward-looking issues in international arbitration. In 2020, CARTAL successfully
conducted the 5th edition of the Gary B. Born Essay Competition on International Arbitration.
In keeping with previous years, CARTAL is organising the 6th Gary B. Born Essay Competition
on International Arbitration [“Competition”] to encourage research and literature in international
arbitration. The Competition has the gracious support and patronage of Prof. Gary B. Born, who
is the chair of the International Arbitration Practice Group of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and
Dorr LLP. Prof. Born has participated as counsel in more than 675 international arbitrations,
including four of the largest ICC arbitrations and several of the most significant ad hoc arbitrations
in recent history. He is widely regarded as the world’s preeminent authority on international
arbitration, having been ranked for more than 20 years as one of the world’s leading international
arbitration advocates and the leading arbitration practitioner in London.
The themes of the sixth edition of the competition aim to foster research on some of the
contemporary developments in international arbitration, and are listed below:
In recent years, there has been a marked increase in parties seeking to adduce unlawfully obtained
evidence in international arbitration. With the increased number of virtual hearings, this issue has
been exacerbated by the emerging concerns of compromised cybersecurity and data leaks. This
has necessitated discussion about the admissibility of unlawfully obtained evidence. The “fruit of
the poisonous tree” doctrine posits that illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible as it is tainted.
However, this doctrine is not universally applied in international arbitration, with tribunals
exercising a wide latitude of discretion as to admissibility. International arbitral tribunals have
approached this issue in many ways, attempting to balance the parties’ right to be heard and the
need to deliver an award that does not contravene public policy. Recently, the addition of Article
9.3 to the IBA Rules on Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2020) has expressly
affirmed that the tribunal may, at the request of a party or on its own motion, exclude evidence
obtained illegally; reigniting academic discussion on this point. In light of jurisdictional differences
in applying the doctrine and emerging concerns, participants may examine these and other issues,
such as the relevance of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine in international arbitration, the
competing considerations that play a role in the tribunal’s decision, whether the nature of the
illegality should play a role in the tribunal’s decision, and possible frameworks or standards that
can be harmoniously applied.
Most modern data protection laws protect personal information. There is vast exchange of
information in international arbitration, including information that can allow for an individual to
be identified. This leads to the need to address data protection issues within the unique context of
international arbitration. An international arbitration involves multiple stakeholders such as
arbitrators, arbitral institutions, third-party service providers, witnesses, counsels, parties and
employees of the parties, all of whom may be governed by different data protection laws. Further,
with the increase in the number of virtual arbitrations, there has also been an increase in the flow
of data through electronic means, raising additional concerns. In light of this, the ICCA-IBA Joint
Task Force on Data Protection in International Arbitration is set to release a revised version of
the ICCA-IBA Roadmap to Data Protection in International Arbitration. Such a complex scenario
presents wide ranging issues, which include determining the roles of various stakeholders (for
example, if arbitrators are joint controllers), extra-territorial application of data protection laws,
restriction on cross-border transfer of data affecting disclosures, the role of institutions in
addressing data protection concerns in arbitrations, and the use of data protection laws as weapons
to obstruct the arbitration proceedings. The participants may analyse such issues arising out of the
interface between data protection laws and international arbitration.
The prospect of disputes in the arena of climate change being arbitrated has gained traction. This
is exemplified by the 2019 report of the ICC Task Force on “Arbitration of Climate Change Related
Disputes” which sought to define climate change related disputes. In the commercial world, climate
change has assumed significant priority. Many industry sectors, such as the oil and gas sector,
energy sector and construction sector, may have to deal with climate change-related disputes and
increased regulatory issues. Contracts now include specific compliances and stipulations relating
to climate change including, but not limited to, mitigation. Arbitration institutions also recognise
the growth in this sector. Many recently negotiated bilateral investment treaties [“BITs”] such as
the 2016 Morocco-Nigeria BIT and the 2019 Netherlands Model BIT also include environmental
protections and obligations to conduct environmental impact assessments. These are likely to be
considered by arbitral tribunals in the future, and will have an impact on the manner in which
tribunals assess the challenged regulatory measures that have an environmental aspect to consider.
The participants may examine the scope and relevance of this nascent field of environmental and
climate change related arbitrations and opine on the potential of arbitration as a means for
resolving environmental and climate change related disputes from both commercial and
investment treaty perspective. Participants may analyse any aspect of the topic, identifying
challenges and concerns or proposing frameworks within which such arbitration can be
operationalised.
RULES OF THE COMPETITION
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
OTHER RULES
By entering the competition, the participants agree to indemnify the organisers from and
against all claims, suits and damages based on any claim of copyright infringement or
plagiarism or unauthorised use.
The essay shall be considered to be property of the University, which reserves the right of
publication of the same in any book, journal, or in any other manner as it may deem
appropriate, without providing any royalty or compensation.
The results of the Competition shall be announced in the last week of November 2021
(tentatively). The organizers may, at their discretion, hold an award ceremony to release the
results on the aforementioned date or otherwise, alone or in conjunction with another event.
Any further publication after declaration of results shall only be pursued after express
permission from the organisers.
The winners of the Competition authorize the organizers to use their names and photos, if
required, for the purpose of publicizing the Competition and its results.
PRIZES
CHIEF PATRON
Prof. (Dr.) Poonam Saxena, Hon’ble Vice Chancellor
FACULTY ADVISER
Dr. Nidhi Gupta, Associate Professor (Law)
EDITORS-IN-CHIEF
Aditya Singh Chauhan Aryan Yashpal
EXECUTIVE EDITOR EXECUTIVE ADVISER MANAGING EDITOR
Jehan Jhaveri Isha Sen Devika Sreekumar
SENIOR CONTENT EDITORS
Bhavyakirti Singh Rishika Arya Varsha Divakar
ASSOCIATE EDITORS
Aniketa Jain Navya Bhandari Rahul Lal
Rashmin Kansal Rajiv Yadav Rishabh Periwal
Shivam Jain Vidhi Damani Vishnu M
COPY EDITORS
Fatema Kinkhabwala Hemang Mankar Mythri Murali
Raunak Rai Maini Reet Malik Siri Harish
Tanvi Kaushal Tarun Katariya