Professional Documents
Culture Documents
32.1 INTRODUCTION
Extensive studies of the mechanism and kinetics of the anionic polymerization of epoxides and
episulfides have been reported during the last few decades, and they were reviewed quite recently by
several authors. 1 - 5 Most of the experiments were carried out with ethylene oxide (oxirane) and
propylene sulfide (2-methylthiirane) because the living character of the polymerization of these
two monomers, under specific conditions, has been well established; 6,7 propylene oxide
(2-methyloxirane) polymerizes anionically with transfer to monomer, and poly(ethylene sulfide) is
insoluble. In this chapter, the kinetics and mechanisms of the ring-opening reactions of epoxides and
episulfides with nucleophilic initiators, as well as with the living ends during propagation, will be
presented.
467
468 Anionic Polymerization
napthalene with ethylene oxide (Scheme l). 8 The first step was found to be rate determining.9 Its
kinetics were investigated by spectrophotometry and electron spin resonance (ESR). The process
was found to be first order with respect to monomer and initiator, and the bimolecular rate constant
was about 11 mol" 1 s" x in THF at 25 °C. The reduction of the adduct (1) by sodium naphthalene
gives the dianion (2) which has been isolated and characterized in THF 1 0 and in dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO). 11 Addition of another molecule of ethylene oxide yields the para and/or ortho diadduct
bearing two alkoxide groups (3) that are responsible for the subsequent propagation.
CH 2 CH,0
(1)
(2)
(2)
H CH 2 CH 2 0
<2>+ V (3)
H CH 2 CH 2 0"
(3)
Scheme 1
Potassium complexes of aromatic nitriles and ketones have also been used for polymerizing
episulfides.14 The reaction in THF of radical anions of 4-cyanobiphenyl, 1-cyanopyrene and
benzophenone was interpreted by a mechanism similar to that shown for sodium naphthalene
Anionic Ring-opening Polymerization: Epoxides and Episulfides 469
(Scheme 2), involving Na 2 S 2 formation and regeneration of the initial nitrile or ketone. However, the
percentage of regenerated compound recovered varied with the initiator and with the episulflde and
was always lower than 100%. This was attributed to more or less extensive coupling of monomer
radical-anions with the initiator (for propylene and styrene sulfides) or to a direct attack on the
monomer by the radical anions (ethylene sulfide). In the same study, 14 it was assumed that initiation
with dianions of nitriles proceeds mainly by electron transfer to monomer.
Electroinitiated anionic polymerization of propylene sulfide in dimethylformamide (DMF) was
also explained by an electron-transfer reaction to monomer. 15
9 cr
CH2CHrfOCH2CH2]
N--CH2CH2-f-OCH2CH2]—N
CH2CH2-f-XCH2CH2];
more delocalized systems, such as 9-methylfluorenyl (9-MeF") and fluoradenyl (FD~) salts, the
results are opposite. Reactivities of tight ion-pairs decrease on increasing the bulkiness of the cation.
Moreover, free ions and loose ion-pairs are less reactive than tight ion-pairs.
In the case of fluoradenylsodium with pure ethylene oxide, the addition of sodium tetraphenyl-
boride (that depresses the dissociation of ion pairs into free ions) speeds up the cleavage, whereas the
addition of a complexing agent (crown ether, cryptand) slows it down. 17 Thus, it was suggested that
electrophilic activation of the epoxide by cation plays an important role in the ring-opening
reaction. Such a 'push-pull' mechanism may be written as equation (6).
FD*
+
FD"Mt + V 7 FDCH2CH2OMt + (6)
+
o r°Mt
FD = fluoradenyl anion
The cleavage of ethylene oxide by alkali metal salts of 9-methylfluorenyl anion was investigated in
several ethereal solvents. 19 " 22 It was shown that it is a simple process of addition, whereas side
reactions occur for fluorenyl alkali metal salts, 28 according to the mechanism shown in Scheme 3. In
the first step, there is an addition of one molecule of monomer to one molecule of fluorenylsodium to
give (6) which forms a new carbanion (7) by reaction with fluorenylsodium. During this process, half
of the initial fluorenylsodium is consumed, giving inactive fluorene. Solvation by the monomer of
carbanion (7) is instantaneous. It reacts slowly afterwards with ethylene oxide to give a dialkoxide.
In the case of 9-methylfluorenylsodium, reactions (7) and (8) are impossible since there is no
hydrogen in the 9-position. The reaction with ethylene oxide is first order in monomer and in salt.
Here again, the tight ion-pairs were found to be more reactive than the cryptated pairs or free anions.
For example, the bimolecular rate constant of the cleavage, determined in tetrahydropyran (THP)
at — 30°C, is 8.5 x 1 0 - 1 m o l l - 1 m i n _ 1 for a tight sodium salt, whereas it is only
3.0 x 10" 5 m o l l - 1 m i n - 1 for the cryptated salt. The coordination of the cation with the cryptand
makes it inaccessible for interaction with ethylene oxide, therefore the cleavage becomes much
slower in the presence of the ligand. Interestingly, the rate constant for cleavage is about three times
lower in THF than in THP, presumably because ethylene oxide, which interacts strongly with the
cation, has to compete with the solvent, and the better the solvating power of the solvent the more
difficult the competition.
CH2CH2ONa +
X
+
V-Na
H
V H
(7)
(6)
CH 2 CH 2 0 Na +
Na+ H
(6) +
X X
H
- X H
7C-Na
(7)
+
(8)
CH2CH20_Na +
v
(7) + ^ 7
(9)
(8)
jCH2CH2ONa+
(8) -*• c r-iNa
N (10)
/ CH2CH2ONa+ / X
H
Scheme 3
Anionic Ring-opening Polymerization: Epoxides and Episulfides All
According to Scheme 4, Mt + is, of course, attracted by A~ but it can also interact with the solvent
(S), ethylene oxide (EO) or with a ligand (L) such as crown ethers (CE) or cryptands, the strength of
interaction following the sequence: THP < THF < EO < CE < (5a). This coordination will be
stronger if the negative charge on the anion is more delocalized. For a given anion, it will also be
stronger with smaller cations of high field strength, such as Li + or Na + . Thus, if ethylene oxide can
act as a coordinating agent (delocalization of the anion, absence of cryptand), the predominant effect
is the electrophilic activation of ethylene oxide by the cation. The specific cation assistance is
completely inhibited on addition of a cryptand, thus leading to a decrease in reactivity.
AMt+ + S
Scheme 4
For more localized anions, such as carbazyl salts, the interaction of the anion with Mt + is stronger
and that of Mt + with ethylene oxide is smaller, weakening the electrophilic activation of the
monomer. 1 6 ' 1 9 , 2 1 ' 2 7 ' 1 2 0 The classical order—free ions more reactive than ion-pairs — is observed in
that system. Introduction of two additional benzene rings in the carbazyl anion (9) leads to a
delocalization of the negative charge on the nitrogen in the dibenzocarbazyl anion (10). Kinetic
studies of the epoxide cleavage in THF at 20 °C led to the following bimolecular rate constants.
N-K + :/Ci = 2 1 x l ( T 3 l m o r 1 m i i r 1 ; N " : k{ = 78 x 10" 3 lmol" ^ i n " 1 ; DBN"K + :/c- =5.7
x 10-3lmor1min"1;DBN-:k|._=2.3xlO-3Imor1min-1.
The rate constants ki were derived from experiments made with cryptated salts. As a consequence
of this delocalization, free ions as well as ion pairs in the dibenzo derivative are less reactive than the
similar species of the carbazyl salt and, significantly, the order of reactivities of the free ions and ion
pairs is reversed.
Interesting initiators for the polymerization of ethylene, propylene or 1,2-butene oxides were
reported by Inoue et a/. 4 ' 2 9 - 3 1 Following their earlier studies on tetraphenylporphyrin-aluminum
complexes, which were efficient initiators for propylene oxide polymerization and its copolymeriz-
ation with carbon dioxide, they modified the original complex by substituting AlEt2Cl for AlEt 3 .
The active species is (11).
Ph
(11) TPhPorAlCl
The initiation reaction proceeds rapidly, involving insertion into the Al—Cl bond according to
equation (11), followed by the analogous propagation, since ClCH 2 CHMeCH 2 OH was isolated
when an equimolar mixture of the initiator (11) and propylene oxide was hydrolyzed.
Numerous anions and their ion pairs have been used for the ring opening of episulfides.
Unexpectedly, it was found that triphenylmethylsodium in THF leads to the formation of poly
propylene sulfide) having two living ends per macromolecule and a degree of polymerization which
was double the theoretical value DP n = [M]/[I]. 3 2 The mechanism shown in Scheme 5 was
proposed. A rapid electron-transfer from the carbanion to the monomer gives the triphenylmethyl
radical which slowly dimerizes; NaS« dimerizes also and the subsequent sodium disulfide initiates the
propagation.
Ph3CNa + Me
^z ^ MeCH=CH -I- Ph3C- + -SNa (12)
Scheme 5
The fluorenyl tetrabutylammonium salt also leads to the formation of poly(propylene sulfide), the
molecular weights of which obey the relationship DP n = 2[M]/[I]; only half of the fluorene residues
are incorporated in the polymer. 33 The reactions shown in Scheme 6 can take place. The reaction of
(14) with propylene sulfide is slow and goes to completion only when a large excess of monomer is
present. A similar reaction of fluorenyl salts was studied in more detail with ethylene oxide, but in
that case there is a straightforward nucleophilic attack on the CH 2 of the monomer.
Me
+ CH 2 =CHMe (15)
(14) +
(17)
BiuNT-S^^S^NBiu
Scheme 6
Carbazyl salts were used for the preparation of monofunctional living polymers of propylene
sulfide.22 The effect of the nature of the counterion on the initiation rate in THF 3 4 will be examined
in Section 32.3.3 after the discussion of similar results for the propagation reaction. In the same
manner, the kinetic results obtained for the ring opening of 2-methyl-2-ethylthiirane with carbazyl
salts in THP 3 5 are close to those relative to the propagation of propylene sulfide under similar
conditions. 36
Further discussion about the ion-pairing effect can be found in the section dealing with the
propagation steps. As pointed out by Szwarc,3 'the usefulness of an initiator is determined by two
factors. Firstly, how readily it reacts with a monomer in producing its respective anion. Secondly, the
anion derived from a monomer may or may not interact with the cation introduced by the initiator.
Hence, such cations that produce the most reactive propagating species are the most desired. Here
the effect of cryptates is of a great importance since in many propagation reactions the cryptated
ion-pairs are more reactive than the tight ion-pairs'.
Anionic Ring-opening Polymerization: Epoxides and Episulfides 473
O
vrvCH2CH20,Na+ + X X ► wCH2CH2OCH2CH2Cr,Na+ (20)
P„CH2CH20,Na + + PmCH2CH2OH ±5 P„CH2CH2OH + PmCH2CH20, Na+ (21)
The system is composed of two types of chains: the growing ones having the — C H 2 0 ~ , N a + end-
group and the 'dormant' ones possessing the —CH 2 OH end-group as noted by Szwarc.45 The
reversible chain-transfer equilibrium converts the growing polymers into dormant ones and vice
versa. The propagation reaction was found to be first order in alcohol. The range of dielectric
constant was 5-13 and the active species were considered to be the ion pairs of the alkali metal
alkoxides. Moreover, the rate constant of propagation increased with the size of the counterion,
from N a + to K + .
In the associated study in pure methanol, the alkoxide was thought to be completely dissociated
into ions, and the active species to be the free alkoxide ions. 44 Their reactivity was found to be higher
474 Anionic Polymerization
In the case of the potassium salt, propagation is again first order in monomer, but the order with
respect to the potassium alkoxide is between 0 and 1. The rates are near to first order at lower
concentrations of living ends, but nearly independent of concentration at the highest. Addition of
potassium tetraphenylboride leads to a decrease in the rate of propagation. It seems that the
aggregation of ion pairs is less pronounced in the potassium system than in the sodium, while their
direct dissociation into free ions as well as their capacity to form triple ions is enhanced.
Simple behaviour is observed in the case of the cesium salt. 50 The reaction was found to be first
order in monomer. The observed bimolecular propagation constant, fcp = (— dln[M]/dr)/[C] with
[C] = concentration of living ends, was found to be a linear function of 1/[C] 1/2 in the absence of
cesium tetraphenylboride, whereas it is a linear function of l/[Cs + ] in the presence of cesium
tetraphenylboride. These relationships are shown in Figure 1. They represent a classical behaviour,
in which propagation occurs through ion pairs in equilibrium with a small amount of free ions which
are much more reactive.45 From the slopes of the lines shown in the figure, the propagation constant
of the free anions was determined as /cp_ = 22 lmol" 1 s" 1 and the dissociation constant of the ion
Anionic Ring-opening Polymerization: Epoxides and Episulfides 475
pairs as 5 x 10 5 moll \ at 40°C. The latter value was confirmed by conductance measurements.
The propagation constant of ion pairs was deduced from the intercept of the lines (Figure 1),
/cp±=0.21mor1s-1.
10 20 30 40 50 60
,/2 2 +
[C]" orlO- /[Cs ]
Figure 1 Plots of bimolecular propagation rate constant kp of ethylene oxide polymerization in HMPA at 40 °C, with Cs +
counterion, vs. reciprocal of square-root concentration of living ends 1/[C] 1/2 (O) or reciprocal of Cs + concentration,
l/[Cs + ] ( • ) , [C] = 1.90 x 10~ 3 moll"*; A, [C] = 8.07 x 10" 4 m o l l - 1 (reproduced from ref. 50)
Several papers have been published on the anionic polymerization of ethylene oxide in DMSO,
initiated by alkali metal alkoxides 5 1 - 5 5 and by dimsylpotassium or dimsylcesium (dimsyl
=MeSOCH2 ) 5 6 It was shown that ethylene oxide was readily converted to living polymer by
potassium £-butoxide at room temperature without any noticeable chain-transfer reactions. 51 In all
cases, the propagation was found to be first order in the monomer.
A reaction which was less than first order with respect to the reactive species was noticed in the
case of N a + counterion. 56 This was attributed to the presence of ion pairs in equilibrium with a
relatively small amount of free ions. The respective propagation rate constants were determined as
/ c p ± = 0 . 6 3 x l O - M m o P ^ " 1 and/c p _ = 1.2 x 10 - 2 lmol ^ s " 1 with KD = 6.15x 10" moll" 1 at
50 °C. In the case of K + and Cs + counterions, conductance measurements performed on meth-
oxides 57 as well as on living poly(ethylene oxide)s 53 ' 56 showed that the active species are fully
dissociated into free ions in the concentration range examined. Thus, KD is equal to 4.71
x 10" 2 mol 1" for K + and to 9.43 x 10" 2 mol 1"x for Cs + , for living polyethylene oxide)s in DMSO
at25°C. 5 6
A high order in initiator, namely 1.9, was reported for the polymerization of ethylene oxide
initiated by E t O C 2 H 4 O C 2 H 4 0 " , C s + in DMSO at 50°C, 53 as shown in Figure 2. On the other
hand, first-order dependence on the concentration of alkoxides was claimed by other auth
ors. 5 2 ' 5 5 ' 5 6 An interesting attempt to reconcile these contradictory findings has been reported. 54 As
revealed by conductance studies made on alkali metal alkoxides in DMSO, 5 7 the complex equilibria
shown in Scheme 7 were established in the alkoxide-DMSO systems; where S~ denotes free dimsyl
anion; Mt + , the alkali counterion; S~,Mt + , the ion pair of the dimsyl anion; RO~, the free alkoxide
-log [C]
Figure 2 Plot of log of bimolecular propagation rate constant kp of ethylene oxide polymerization in DMSO at 50 °C vs. log
of concentration of the initiator [C], EtOC 2 H 4 OC 2 H 4 0",Cs" t "; slope = 1.9 (reproduced by permission of Hiithig & Wepf
from ref. 53)
476 Anionic Polymerization
anion; RO ,Mt + , the alkali metal alkoxide ion-pair; SH, dimethyl sulfoxide; ROH, the alcohol; and,
finally, RO(HOR)", R O " , Mt + (HOR), RO(HOR)2" and RO",Mt + (HOR) 2 , aggregates of different
order between dissociated and undissociated alkoxide and its respective alcohol. Addition of
ethylene oxide to such a system leads to its polymerization through the formation of new alkoxides
by reaction with RO ~ and S ~ if they are assumed to be active initiating species. These new alkoxides
will attack DMSO to form the corresponding alcohols according to equilibrium (23), which will
associate according to equilibrium (24), and so on . . . At any time, the rate of propagation is given
by equation (30).
Ko
S~ + Mt + «± S",Mt+ (25)
The problem arises when looking for the order with respect to the initiator. It seems that the free
alkoxide anions are the most reactive species contributing to the propagation. The activity of
aggregates is negligible compared to other species, since the addition of small amounts of alcohol
strongly decreases the rate of propagation. 52 Moreover, the dimsyl anions do not play an important
role otherwise the oligomers would have a significant sulfur content which is contrary to the
experimental findings.52 Thus, equation (30) would simplify to equation (31). Using the equilibrium
constants reported in the conductance studies on alkali metal alkoxides,57 it is possible to calculate
the concentration of R O " anions as a function of the initiator concentration [RO~,M + ] 0 as shown
in Figure 3. The results reveal two regions of alkoxide concentration: at higher dilution, the
concentration of [RO~] depends on the initiator concentration to the power of 1.95, whereas, at
higher concentrations, it is proportional to the initiator concentration to the power of 1. Since the
rate of propagation is assumed to be proportional to [ R O - ] , the contradictory claims seem to be
reconciled.
Rp « /c p _[RO-][M] (3D
The kinetics of polymerization of ethylene oxide have also been reported in ethers, mainly in
T H F . 9 , 1 0 , 2 1 , 2 2 ' 2 7 , 5 8 - 6 2 THF solutions of sodium, potassium and cesium naphthalene were used
as the initiators and they gave living polymers. 9 1 0 ' 5 8 , 5 9 An increase in the propagation rate was
observed on increasing the size of the counterion. The study was complicated by strong association
of alkoxide end-groups. This phenomenon was clearly shown by the gelation observed on addition
of ethylene oxide to THF solutions of (polystyryl)sodium with two active end-groups. 63 The
association was manifested by the low fractional kinetic order of propagation, 10 as illustrated in
Figure 4. The rate of propagation was shown to be order 0.25 in concentration of sodium alkoxide
over the complete range of concentration examined, and about 0.33 for the potassium and cesium
salts. 10 For concentrations lower than 10" 4 moll" 1 , the process tended towards first order in the
case of K + and Cs + counterions. On this basis, the propagation constants of the unassociated
alkoxide ion-pairs were estimated to be 0.941 mol" x s" 1 for the potassium salt and 3.5 1 mol" 1s~1
for the cesium salt at 70 °C. 10 The contribution of free alkoxide ions was discarded in view of the
extremely low dissociation constant of alkoxide ion-pairs in THF: KD = 1 0 - 1 1 moll" 1 for K + and
7 x 10" 1 0 mol 1"x for Cs + at 20 °C. 59 The association of alkoxide end-groups was also confirmed by
Anionic Ring-opening Polymerization: Epoxides and Episulfides 477
slope «1.95 y
8.0 r-
7.0
/
O 6.0
,0C
/
6s
f5.0
4.0
slope = 1.0
3.0
X _L
2.0 30 4.0 5.0
-log[RO~Mt + ] 0
Figure 3 Change in free alkoxide anion concentration [RO~] with alkali metal alkoxide concentration [RO",Mt + J 0 for
potassium f-butoxide (O) and cesium f-butoxide ( • ) in DMSO at 25 °C (reproduced by permission of Huthig & Wepf from
ref. 54)
-5 -4 -3 -2 -I
ln[P*]
Figure 4 Logarithmic plots of propagation rate constant (s" l ) of ethylene oxide polymerization vs. concentration of active
centres [P*]: ( □ ) N a + , 99.4°C, THF; (©) K + , 30°C; ( 0 ) K + , 40°C, in bulk; (A) K + , 70°C; (A) K + , 80°C; (O) Cs + . 60°C;
(O) Cs + , 70°C, all in THF, [ M ] 0 ~ 2 m o l l - 1 (reproduced from ref. 10)
viscometric measurements on living and terminated poly(ethylene oxide)s.10 The stability of these
aggregates decreases from Li + to Cs + .
The propagation was found to be first order in ethylene oxide except at the very beginning of the
reaction, where the rate constant kp increased with the chain length, reaching a limiting value at
n = 4-6 (see equation 32). 58,62 This autoacceleration process was observed even at low concentra
tions of active centres (< 10 " 4 moll" x ). A possible explanation is that this is the result of progressive
solvation of the ion pair by the growing macromolecule. Several indirect proofs of this phenomenon
have been afforded.
The poly(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ethers with the general formula MeO-f-Cj^O-^Me, referred
to as glymes, are very effective alkali-metal-sol vating agents. 64 Quantitative studies of solvation of
ion pairs with poly(ethylene oxide) have been performed using different physicochemical tech
niques. 6 5 " 6 7 It is also well known that remarkable rate accelerations are observed in several
nucleophilic reactions on adding poly(ethylene oxide) to the medium. 68 This was explained by a
cooperative coordination of the oxygen atoms of poly(ethylene oxide) with metal cations, promoting
ion dissociaton of the reagent.
478 Anionic Polymerization
Several authors have tried to obtain more direct experimental proofs of this self-solvation effect
during the anionic polymerization of ethylene oxide. They examined the dissociation constant, KD,
of several mono- 60 and bi-functional69 oligomers of ethylene oxide. Though there are some
important discrepancies between the two sets of results, KD was found to increase with the number of
ether units in the chain. This was attributed to the intramolecular solvation of the counterion K + by
the oxygen of the macromolecule nearest to the chain end. The mechanism of participation in
conductivity of the cation entrapped by the polymer chain is still unclear. Thus, the conductance
results on living poly(ethylene oxide)s in THF should be considered as tentative. Moreover, no
attention was paid to the perturbations afforded by the glass walls of the conductance apparatus.
Poly(ethylene oxide) in THF can dissolve a non-negligible amount of Na + from the glass since it is a
powerful solvating agent; the conductivity of these species can be higher than that of the studied
electrolyte.
The influence of different ethereal solvents upon the rate of propagation of ethylene oxide has
been examined. 59 It was found to be nearly the same in THF (/cp = 0.94 l m o l - 1 s - 1 ), in 1,2-
dimethoxyethane (DME) (/cp = 0.71 l m o l - 1 s - 1 ) and in the dimethyl ether of diethylene glycol
(/cp = 0.8 1 mol~ 1 s" 1 ), at 70°C, with K + as the counterion. This insensitivity of the anionic
polymerization of ethylene oxide to an 'external' solvent was explained by the strong shielding effect
of the polymer.
I02a
Figure 5 Plot of propagation rate constant kp of living poly(ethylene oxide) propagation vs. molar fraction of free anions a
with cryptates as counterions, in THF at 20°C: ( • ) K + + (5a); (O) with Ph 4 BK + (5a); ( ■ ) Cs + +(15); ( □ ) with Ph 4 BCs
+ (15) (reproduced by permission of the American Chemical Society from ref. 61)
Counterion KD{mo\rl) K± K-
( l m o r 1 min *)
Na + 0
K+ 1.8 x 1 0 " 1 0 b 2.9 —
Cs + 2.7 x l ( T 1 0 b 7.3 —
Na++(5a) — 0 —
K++(5a) 3x KT7 1.5 100
Cs++(15) 1 x 10_6c 5.6 100d
a
Reproduced by permission of the American Chemical Society from ref. 61.
b
A. A. Solovyanov and K. S. Kazanskii, Vysokomol. Soedin., Ser A, 1972,14,
1063.
c
Determined from kinetic data by assuming that /cp_ = 100 l m o l - 1 min - 1 .
d
/cp _ is assumed to be the same as for K + + (5a).
(15) SC24
terminated poly(ethylene oxide)s. The results obtained with different counterions are listed in
Table 1. Free alkoxide ions are about 70 times more reactive than K + cryptated ion-pairs. It is
difficult to compare the values of /cp_ obtained in different solvents since they were measured at
different temperatures. However, free ions are much more reactive in THF (/cp_ = 1001 mol" x min" x
at 20°C) than in methanol (fcp_ - 1 . 2 x 10~ 2 l m o l " ^ i n " 1 at 30°C) 44 and DMSO
(fc = 0.7 1 mol" * min" 1 at 50 °C). 56 This can be explained by solvation of oxanions by these latter
solvents.77
Cryptated ion-pairs are, surprisingly, less or as reactive as the corresponding non-complexed ion-
pairs though the charges are more separated: KD is 1700 times higher in the case of K + (5a) than
for K"^ alone. Solvation of K + by the oxygen atoms of the terminal units of the living poly(ethylene
oxide) chains, described as the self-solvation effect,62 would make the negative charge more available
480 Anionic Polymerization
for the ring opening of the incoming monomer and, thus, would increase the reactivity of the
potassium ion-pair compared to that of a simple alkoxide. Another additional effect can explain the
surprisingly low reactivity of cryptated ion-pairs. The dissociation constant found for cryptated
potassium alkoxide ion-pairs in THF (KD = 3 x 10" 7 moll" x ) led to an interionic distance a equal
to 4.6 A according to the classical Fuoss equation. This value was too small compared to the results
obtained for cryptated living poly(propylene sulfide)78 as well as for cryptated tetraphenylborides in
THF. 7 5 This might mean that either K + was not located inside the cavity of the ligand or the
oxanion could penetrate into the cavity of the cryptand. This last explanation was consistent with
comparative conductance data obtained for model compounds, 27 ' 61 as shown in Table 2. The KD of
cryptated potassium 2,6-dimethylphenoxide is higher (about four times) than that of the
3,5-dimethylphenoxide cryptated salt. This is due to the methyl groups, which hinder the penetration
of the oxanion into the cavity of the cryptate when they are located in the 2- and 6-positions.
Moreover, a good agreement between the theoretical value of the interionic distance and the value
found for the cryptated 2,6-dimethylphenoxide was observed.
Me
(/ \)0-,K+ + (5a) 6.8 x l ( T 6 6.0
Me
a
Reproduced by permission of the American Chemical Society from
ref. 61.
b
Interionic distance according to Fuoss' equation (ref. 75).
O ,Mt+
^A/' + PhOCH2 v y — ^ w O H . + PhOCH=CHCH 2 CT,Mt + (34)
O
The problem of the structure, mechanism and kinetics of formation of C = C double bonds in the
synthesis of polyethers has been the subject of large number of papers over the last 30 years, for
propylene oxide, 5 1 ' 7 9 - 8 9 for 2,3-epoxypropyl phenyl ether and its derivatives 8 7 , 9 0 - 9 2 as well as
for 2-neopentyloxirane.93 The influence of crown ethers such as (4) on the course of polymerization
of propylene oxide in bulk, initiated by potassium alkoxides in the presence of alcohols, has been
Anionic Ring-opening Polymerization: Epoxides and Episulfides 481
examined. 89 An increase in the rate of propagation was observed together with an increase in the
molecular weight of the polymers. Very interestingly, the percentage of double bonds was found to
decrease on increasing the concentration of crown ether. The results were explained by assuming
that the propagation occurred mainly through the free alkoxide anions, the proportion of which was
increased on adding (4). The chain transfer to the monomer was thought to occur through the ion
pairs with the intervention of K + cations, which was lowered when they were complexed by crown
ether (Scheme 8).
Me
I
"' • ROCH2CHO " ,K + Propagation
RO" Me
Me
-\.—°-'t'-<
+
RO ,K +
^ H—CH 2
ROT \ ROH + CH2=CHCH2Cr,K- Transfer
Scheme 8
As in the case of ethylene oxide polymerization, it was assumed that a dimsyl anion, formed in the
reaction of alkoxide with the solvent (equation 36) and by chain transfer to the solvent (equation 37)
was responsible for initiating the polymerization of propylene oxide and higher epoxides when using
potassium f-butoxide as the initiator in D M S O . 5 1 ' 8 4 ' 8 6 ' 9 2 ' 9 4 ' 9 5 The above assumption was not
confirmed, however, by experiments in the case of 2,3-epoxypropyl phenyl ether polymerization
since no significant amounts of sulfur were found in the polymer.91
K{
ButO,K+ + MeSMe « » MeSCH2,K + + Bu'OH (36)
II II
O O
(16)
CH2OPh
(16) + ^—/ ► PhOCH2CCH2CH2CHO,K +
O II I
O CH2 (39)
OPh
Scheme 9
Kinetic studies of the anionic polymerization of propylene oxide and higher epoxides were
performed in bulk and in polar solvents. In all cases, the propagation was first order in the monomer.
In DMSO, some discrepancies appeared in the order with respect to initiator. First order was
482 Anionic Polymerization
observed for the polymerization of propylene oxide, 51,92 2-t-butyloxirane,94 and 2,3-epoxypropyl
phenyl ether and its derivatives,92 initiated by potassium f-butoxide. However, nearly second-order
was found in the case of propylene oxide (1.7)84 as well as for 2-ethyloxirane (1.8)95 with the same
initiator in DM SO. Some authors tried to reconcile these controversial findings53 (see Section
32.3.1.2). It must be noted that the studies on 2-ethyloxirane polymerization were complicated by
phase separation, the polymer being insoluble in DM SO. On performing the experiments in
mixtures of DMSO with THF, in which the polymer was soluble, the order of the reaction was equal
to one.
The effect of different additives on the bulk anionic polymerization of propylene oxide has been
examined.97 The rate of propagation increased in the following order: MeOH < bulk polymeriz
ation < D M F < HMPA, which is in agreement with the donor-acceptor properties of these com
pounds. The results found for the polymerization of propylene oxide in HMPA and in DMSO show
that the rate constant of propagation was higher in the former solvent than in the latter by a factor of
about three. 92
Kinetic studies on the polymerization of propylene oxide were made in bulk at 120 °C using
potassium salts of polyethylene glycol) monobutyl ethers, Bu-f-OCH 2 CH 2 ^0~,K + with
x = 1, 4, 5 and 13. 98 An increase in the rate constant of propagation was observed on increasing x.
This was attributed to a specific solvation of potassium cations. In the same manner, noticeable
increases in the rate of polymerization of epoxides were found on adding crown ethers. 2 6 ' 8 9 ' 9 2 , 9 9
For instance, the rate constant of propagation of the polymerization of propylene oxide initiated by
potassium t-butoxide, in HMPA at 25 °C, was multiplied by two on adding dicyclohexyl-[18]-
crown-6 with [crown ether]/[K + ] equal to one. 92
The following order of reactivity of epoxides was found: ethylene oxide > propylene oxide > 2-
ethyloxirane in HMPA 9 2 and in DMSO 9 4 using potassium t-butoxide as the initiator. Moreover, it
was found that 2-neopentyloxirane polymerized between 70 to 30 times more slowly than propylene
oxide at 30 °C with potassium as the counterion. 93 These results are consistent with steric hindrance
considerations.
The relative rates of propagation to transfer, kp/ktT, have been estimated for several epoxides
under various conditions. 5 1 ' 8 2 ' 8 3 ' 9 1 - 9 3 The values of this ratio were very similar for propylene
oxide and 2-neopentyloxirane except for those measured in DMSO. This solvent is known to be
excellent for proton abstraction reactions and thus gave a low value for kp/kir. Transfer reactions
were found in polymerizations of 2,3-epoxypropyl phenyl ether initiated by potassium t-butoxide in
bulk at 50 °C, 92 and by sodium methoxide in DMSO at 50 °C 9 1 (kp/ktr ~ 75 in both cases). However,
these reactions did not occur significantly for experiments made at 25 °C in THF/DMSO mixtures
(lv/2v) using potassium naphthalene as the initiator. 100
This was due to the rather arbitrary values assumed for A0 and to irreproducibilities when high
initiator concentrations were used. A good agreement was observed later between the KD of
monofunctional polymers (obtained with carbazylsodium as the initiator) and that of bifunctional
polymers, between - 40°C (KD = 5 x 10" 8 moll"') and 0°C (KD = 0.7 x 10" 8 m o l l " 1 ) . 1 1 0 1 1 1 The
presence of the monomer slightly affects the dielectric constant of the solution, causing some increase
in KD.
The apparent bimolecular rate constants kp for the propagation reaction were measured by
dilatometry in high vacuum systems. 108,110111 The order of the reaction with respect to monomer is
about one for propylene sulfide concentrations lower than 1 moll" 1 , but is a little higher at higher
concentrations due to the influence of the dielectric constant of the monomer (12.9 at — 30 °C
compared to 9.4 for THF). 111 The values of kp vary with the living-end concentration, in agreement
with a simple equilibrium between ion pairs and free ions. Using these data as well as the kinetic data
obtained from runs involving sodium tetraphenylboride, the individual rate constants were
determined, viz. kp+=\x 10" 3 lmol" 1 s " 1 and fcp_ = 1.7 l m o l - x s" 1 at - 4 0 ° C , and fcp±=3.2
x 10" 1 mol s and kp_ ~ 401 mol - 1 s - 1 at 0°C. i n Propagation takes place mainly through free
2 -1 -1
ions which are much more reactive than the tight ion-pairs.
Van't Hoff plots for KD between - 5 0 and + 2 0 ° C give AHD= -30.1 k J m o l - 1 at - 3 0 ° C
(— 34.3 k J mol" J at 20 °C), with no evidence for the presence of non-intimate ion-pairs.x x 2 The same
conclusion was drawn from the Arrhenius plots for /cp_ and kp±. The activation energy of the free
ion propagation was estimated as 4 0 k J m o l - 1 , corresponding to the frequency factor of
~ 109 l m o l - 1 s - 1 , while the respective values for the N a + ion-pairs were reported as 4 6 k J m o l _ 1
and 2 x 107 l m o l - 1 s - 1 . 1 1 1 The main difference in reactivities comes from the difference in the
frequency factors. The ratio /cp_//cp± is of the same order of magnitude as for styrene (with the same
counterion) but there is no contribution of solvent-separated ion-pairs, unlike the case of styrene in
THF where these are the dominant non-dissociated kinetic species, the negative charge on the
thiolate end-groups being more localized than on the carbanions of living polystyrene.
A kinetic study was also performed in THP with Na + as the counterion. 113 The overall rate of
propagation is much smaller than in THF. KD does not change significantly between — 30 and 22 °C
and has a value of 3 x 10" 1 2 m o l l - 1 . At 20°C, using low living-end concentrations
( < 4 x 1 0 - 4 m o l l - 1 ) , the same rate law as in THF is obeyed, with kp± = 5.8 x 10" 2 l m o l ^ s " 1 and
/cp_ = 250 1 mol~ x s'1. The lower rate of reaction in THP compared with THF is due mainly to the
lower concentration of free ions in THP at a given living-end concentration.
At higher living-end concentrations (> 1 0 - 3 m o l l - 1 in THF, 4 x 10" 4 moll" 1 in THP), the rate
becomes independent of thiolate concentration. 1 1 3 1 1 4 Moreover, viscometric measurements show
that living polymers have a higher molecular weight than the corresponding 'killed' polymers.
However, it is not possible to measure the aggregation coefficient n of equation (40). The in
dependence of the rate of propagation on the living-end concentration [C] seems to indicate that
there is a concentration above which the excess living-ends form inactive aggregates.
With lithium counterion in THF, associations between polymer chains become much stronger.
Gel formation has been observed at high concentrations and was attributed not only to associations
of living ends but also to their interactions with bivalent sulfur atoms located in the polymer
chains. 115 Upon addition of 5 to 10 mol % of tetrahydrothiophene, which provides 'monomeric'
bivalent sulfur necessary to prevent the formation of a three-dimensional network, the gel was
broken up, but the viscosity of the polymer solution still remained at abnormally high levels.116
Kinetic studies have been extended to other counterions such as Bu 4 N + 3 3 and Cs + . 78 The most
interesting results were obtained with cryptated cations. 6 1 ' 7 8 ' 1 1 7 ' 1 1 8 The values of the appa
rent propagation rate constant kp = R / [ M ] [C] (with Rp = rate of polymerization, [M] and
[C] = monomer and living-end concentrations) were determined for a given counterion, at a fixed
temperature. Since the main ionic species are ion pairs in equilibrium with free ions, kp depends on
the fraction of free ions according to equation (41).
Examples of plots of kp vs. a are shown in Figure 6, for Na + + (5a) in THF and in THP, at — 30 °C,
giving kp± and fcp_. It should be mentioned that the cryptands can be used in nearly stoichiometric
amounts (excess of about 10%) since the complexation constant giving the 'cryptates' is extremely
high.
484 Anionic Polymerization
a
lc 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
151
1 1 1 1 T"
~ 10
•4c
u
0.05 0.1 0.15
a
Figure 6 Linear dependence of the a p p a r e n t bimolecular rate constant kp of living poly(propylene sulfide) p r o p a g a t i o n on
the fraction of free ions a with N a + + ( 5 a ) as counterion at - 3 0 ° C : ( ■ ) in T H F ; ( T ) in T H P ; ( V ) with P h 4 B N a + (5a) in
T H P (reproduced by permission of the American Chemical Society from ref. 61)
The values of kp± and /cp_ found in THF at — 30 °C are listed in Table 3, together with the values
of the dissociation constant KD and of the interionic distance a£ for the ion pairs. The values of fcp_
may be considered to be the same, within experimental error. The kp± values increase rapidly with
the size of the counterion. With Cs + , kp± is already about 100 times higher than for Na + . In the case
of Bu 4 N + , kv± is about half/c p _; however, there is also some termination reaction, probably of the
type shown in equation (42) since most of the amine can be recovered after a long time. 119
Table 3 P r o p a g a t i o n Rate C o n s t a n t s of Free Ions and Ion Pairs for the Anionic
Polymerization of Propylene Sulfide in T H F at — 30 °C a
a
Reproduced by permission of the Americal Chemical Society from ref. 61.
b
Obtained from kinetic experiments made with and without Ph 4 BNa.
c
Extrapolated from the value at + 15 °C using E+ = 46 kJ mol~ i .
d
Obtained from kinetic data in ref. 33 using a calculated KD.
e
See Table 2, footnote b.
It is interesting to note that the polymerization of propylene sulfide can be initiated electro-
chemically between — 10 and 50 °C, in the presence of tetrabutylammonium perchlorate. 15 The
observed rate can be very satisfactorily explained by a propagation process occuring mainly via free
ions with a /cp_ value in agreement with that derived from 'chemically initiated' polymerizations.
The most unexpected results are those for cryptated cations, 6 1 ' 7 8 ' 1 1 7 ' 1 1 ' 8 since the propagation
of cryptated ion-pairs turned out to be higher than that of the free anions. A plot of log kp± vs. \ja
gives approximately a straight line (Figure 7), and it can be seen that the experimental value for /cp_ is
quite far from the extrapolated value for a = oo. This seems to show that the mechanism for ring
opening differs for free ions and ion pairs. It is possible that a polarization of the CH 2 —S bond in the
monomer occurs before the ring opening and is induced by the ion-pair dipole of the living end. Such
a modification should increase with the magnitude of the ion-pair dipole and then with the interionic
distance a. This leads to an increase in the interaction with the monomer, together with an increase
in the reaction rate. It is understandable that modification of the polarization of the CH 2 —S bond
may be quite different when the interaction occurs with free ions. A similar behaviour was observed
in the case of the ring opening of propylene sulfide by carbazyl salts in THF as shown in Figure 7.
The activation energy for the cryptated Na + +(5a) ion-pairs was estimated as 33 kJmol" 1 , 1 1 8
whereas the values obtained for free ions and for sodium ion-pairs were equal to 40 and 46 kJ mol" \
Anionic Ring-opening Polymerization: Epoxides and Episulfides 485
vNa++fe.2.2j1
ANa++(2.2.ll
THF
0.1 02
\/a(trl)
Figure 7 Variations of the thiolate and carbazyl ion-pairs' reactivities with the reciprocal of the interionic distance
parameter of ion pairs for the ring opening of propylene sulfide at — 30 °C (▲) propagation with thiolate ion-pairs in THF;
(A) in THP; ( • ) initiation with carbazyl ion-pairs in THF
respectively.111 The frequency factor in the case of cryptated ion-pairs is close to that for sodium
ion-pairs: 5 x 107 l m o l - 1 s" 1 118 compared to 2 x 107 l m o l - 1 s - 1 , 1 1 1 whereas it is quite different
from that of free ions (109 1 m o l - ! s~l). These observations are in agreement with the assumption of
two different mechanisms for the ring opening of propylene sulfide according to the type of ionic
species (ion pairs or free ions).
The influence of the solvent was examined in the case of Cs + counterion. 78 The propagation
constant of ion pairs increases from 0.27 in dioxane to 0.5 in THP and to 7-8 l m o l - 1 s - 1 in THF or
DME at 15 °C. Similarly, the reactivity of cryptated Na + -I- (5a) ion-pairs is lower in THP than in
THF. 3 6 The plot of log/c p± vs. \/a for the results found in THP at - 30 °C, in the case of Na + , Cs +
and N a + + (5a), gives a straight line nearly parallel to the line observed in THF. In general, the ion
pairs' reactivity decreases with the dielectric constant of the medium for a given counterion because
separation of the charges in the transition state is more difficult in a medium of lower dielectric
constant. The reactivity of free ions is the same in THP and in THF: fep_ = 3.4 l m o l - 1 s" 1 in THP
at - 3 0 ° C , 3 6 whereas the average value of fcp_ in THF at 30°C is 3.8 lmol" 1 s" 1 (see Table 3).
Moreover, these values are very close to that found in DMF at — 30 °C from data of propylene
sulfide polymerization, initiated electrochemically: k =4 l m o l - 1 s - 1 . 1 5
32.4 REFERENCES
1. S. By water, Prog. Polym. Sci., 1975, 4, 27.
2. N. C. Billingham, in 'Developments in Polymerization', ed. R. N. Haward, Applied Science, London, 1979, vol. 1, p. 147.
3. M. Szwarc, Adv. Polym. Sci., 1983, 49, 1.
4. S. Inoue and T. Aida, in 'Ring Opening Polymerization', ed. K. J. Ivin and T. Saegusa, Elsevier Applied Science, London
and New York, 1984, vol. 1, p. 185.
5. P. Sigwalt and N. Spassky, in 'Ring Opening Polymerization', ed. K. J. Ivin and T. Saegusa, Elsevier Applied Science,
London and New York, 1984, vol. 2, p. 603.
6. J. E. Figueruelo and D. J. Worsfold, Eur. Polym. J., 1968, 4, 439.
7. S. Boileau, G. Champetier and P. Sigwalt, Makromol. Chem., 1963, 69, 180.
8. D. H. Richards and M. Szwarc, Trans. Faraday Soc, 1959, 55, 1644.
9. T. J. Dudek, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Akron, 1961.
10. K. S. Kazanskii, A. A. Solovyanov and S. G. Entelis, Eur. Polym. J., 1971, 7, 1421.
11. I. Cabasso and A. Zilkha, J. Macromol. Sci., Chem., 1974, A8, 1313.
12. S. Boileau, G. Champetier and P. Sigwalt, J. Polym. Sci., Part C, 1967, 16, 3021.
13. L. Sousselier, These Dt. 3° Cycle, Universite P. et M. Curie, Paris, 1974.
14. I. M. Panayotov and I. V. Berlinova, Makromol. Chem., 1972, 154, 139.
15. G. Mengoli and S. Daolio, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Lett. Ed., 1975, 13, 743.
16. D. Lassalle, These Dt. d'Etat, Universite P. et M. Curie, Paris, 1972.
486 Anionic Polymerization
17. C. J. Chang, R. F. Kiesel and T. E. Hogen-Esch, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1973, 95, 8446.
18. A. A. Solovyanov and K. S. Kazanskii, Vysokomol. Soedin., Ser. A, 1974, 16, 595.
19. P. Sigwalt, J. Polym Sci., Polym. Symp., 1975, 50, 95.
20. D. Lassalle, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Eur. Polym. J., 1977, 13, 599.
21. S. Boileau, A. Deffieux, D. Lassalle, F. Menezes and B. Vidal, Tetrahedron Lett., 1978, 1767.
22. P. Sigwalt and S. Boileau, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp., 1978, 62, 51.
23. A. Deffieux, P. Sigwalt and S. Boileau, Eur. Polym. J., 1984, 20, 77.
24. B. Dietrich, J. M. Lehn and J. P. Sauvage, Tetrahedron Lett., 1969, 2885, 2889.
25. For a review, see J. M. Lehn, in 'Structure and Bonding', Springer, Berlin, 1973, vol. 16, p.l.
26. H. Koinuma, K. Naito and H. Hirai, Makromol. Chem., 1982, 183, 1383.
27. A. Deffieux, These Dt. d'Etat, Universite P. et M. Curie, Paris, 1978.
28. D. Lassalle, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Eur. Polym. J., 1977, 13, 591.
29. N. Takada and S. Inoue, Makromol. Chem., 1978, 179, 1377.
30. T. Aida and S. Inoue, Macromolecules, 1981, 14, 1162, 1166.
31. S. Inoue, Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp., 1986, 3, 295.
32. S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1968, 1054.
33. G. Tersac, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Makromol. Chem., 1971, 149, 153.
34. P. Hemery, V. Warzelhan and S. Boileau, Polymer, 1980, 21, 77.
35. A. Rakotomanga, These Dt. 3° Cycle, Universite P. et. M. Curie, Paris, 1977.
36. H. Dang Ngoc, These Dt. d'Etat, Universite P. et M. Curie, Paris, 1979.
37. M. Morton, 'Anionic Polymerization: Principles and Practice', Academic Press, New York, 1983, p. 102.
38. K. Gonsalves and M. D. Rausch, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1986, 24, 1419.
39. R. P. Quirk and N. S. Seung, ACS Symp. Ser., 1985, 286, 37.
40. M. Morton and K. F. Kammereck, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1970, 92, 3217.
41. A. Roggero, T. Salvatori, A. Proni and A. Mazzei, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Lett. Ed., 1979, 17, 125.
42. S. Perry and H. Hibbert, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1940, 62, 2599.
43. G. Gee, W. C. E. Higginson and G. T. Merall, J. Chem. Soc, 1959, 1345.
44. G. Gee, W. C. E. Higginson, P. Levesley and K. T. Taylor, J. Chem. Soc, 1959, 1338.
45. M. Szwarc, 'Carbanions, Living Polymers and Electron Transfer Processes', Interscience, New York, 1968.
46. N. N. Lebedev and Yu. I. Baranov, Vysokomol. Soedin., 1966, 8, 198.
47. N. N. Lebedev and Yu. I. Baranov, Kinet. Katal., 1966, 7, 619.
48. J. E. Figueruelo and A. Bello, J. Macromol. Sci., Chem., 1969, A3, 311.
49. G. E. M. Jones and O. L. Highes, J. Chem. Soc, 1934, 1197.
50. S. Nenna and J. E. Figueruelo, Eur. Polym. J., 1975, 11, 511.
51. C. C. Price and D. D. Carmelite, J, Am. Chem. Soc, 1966, 88, 4039.
52. C. E. H. Bawn, A. Ledwith and N. McFarlane, Polymer, 1969, 10, 653.
53. S. Nenna and J. E. Figueruelo, Makromol. Chem., 1975, 176, 3377.
54. M. Rodriguez and J. E. Figueruelo, Makromol. Chem., 1975, 176, 3107.
55. K. S. Kazanskii, A. A. Solovyanov and S. A. Dubrovsky, Makromol. Chem., 1978, 179, 969.
56. A. A. Solovyanov and K. S. Kazanskii, Vysokomol. Soedin., Ser. A, 1972, 14, 1072.
57. J. H. Exner and E. C. Steiner, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1974, 96, 1782.
58. A. A. Solovyanov and K. S. Kazanskii, Vysokomol. Soedin., Ser. A, 1970, 12, 2114.
59. A. A. Solovyanov and K. S. Kazanskii, Vysokomol. Soedin., Ser A, 1972, 14, 1063.
60. N. V. Ptitsyna, V. K. Kazakevich and K. S. Kazanskii, Vysokomol. Soedin., Ser. A, 1977, 19, 2787.
61. S. Boileau, ACS Symp. Ser., 1981, 166, 283.
62. K. S. Kazanskii, Pure Appl. Chem., 1981, 53, 1645.
63. H. Brody, D. H. Richards and M. Szwarc, Chem. Ind. (London), 1958, 1473.
64. J. Smid, in Tons and Ion Pairs in Organic Reactions', ed. M. Szwarc, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972, vol. 1, p. 86.
65. D. K. Dimov, I. M. Panayotov, V. N. Lazarov and C. B. Tsvetanov, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1982, 20, 1389.
66. G. N. Arkhipovitch, S. A. Dubrovskii, K. S. Kazanskii, N. V. Ptitsina and A. N. Shupik, Eur. Polym. J., 1982, 18, 576.
67. G. N. Arkhipovitch, Ye. A. Ugolkova and K. S. Kazanskii, Polym. Bull. (Berlin), 1984, 12, 181.
68. See, for instance, A. Hirao, S. Nakahama, M. Takahashi and N. Yamazaki, Makromol. Chem., 1978, 179, 915.
69. I. V. Berlinova, I. M. Panayotov and C. B. Tsvetanov, Eur. Polym. J., 1977, 13, 757.
70. A. Bar-Ilan and A. Zilkha, J. Macromol. Sci., Chem., 1970, A4, 1727.
71. J. A. Orvik, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1976, 98, 3322.
72. A. Deffieux and S. Boileau, Polymer, 1977, 18, 1047.
73. A. Deffieux, E. Graf and S. Boileau, Polymer, 1981, 22, 549.
74. C. D. Eisenbach and M. Peuscher, Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun., 1980, 1, 105.
75. S. Boileau, P. Hemery and J. C. Justice, J. Solution Chem., 1975, 4, 873.
76. E. Graf and J. M. Lehn, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1975, 97, 5022.
77. A. J. Parker, Chem. Rev., 1969, 69, 1.
78. P. Hemery, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp., 1975, 52, 189.
79. L. E. St. Pierre and C. C. Price, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1956, 78, 3432.
80. G. J. Dege, R. L. Harris and J. S. MacKenzie, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1959, 81, 3374.
81. D. M. Simons and J. J. Verbanc, J. Polym. Sci., 1960, 44, 303.
82. G. Gee, W. C. E. Higginson, K. J. Taylor and M. W. Trenholme, J. Chem. Soc, 1961, 4298.
83. E. C. Steiner, R. R. Pelletier and R. O. Trucks, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1964, 86, 4678.
84. L. P. Blanchard, V. Hornof, J. Moinard and F. Tahiani, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1972, 10, 3089.
85. G. A. Gladkovskii, L. P. Golovina, G. F. Vedeneyeva and V. S. Lebedev, Vysokomol. Soedin., Ser. A, 1973, 15, 1221.
86. C. C. Price, Ace Chem. Res., 1974, 7, 294.
87. A. Stolarzewicz, H. Becker and G. Wagner, Ada Polym., 1981, 32, 483.
88. H. Becker, G. Wagner and A. Stolarzewicz, Acta Polym., 1982, 33, 34.
89. H. Becker and G. Wagner, Acta Polym., 1984, 35, 28.
Anionic Ring-opening Polymerization: Epoxides and Episulfides 487
90. C. C. Price, Y. Atarashi and R. Yamamoto, J. Polym. ScL, Part A-l, 1969, 7, 569.
91. P. Banks and R. H. Peters, J. Polym. ScL, Part A-J, 1970, 8, 2595.
92. C. C. Price and M. K. Akkapeddi, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1972, 94, 3972.
93. W. H. Snyder and A. E. Meisinger, Jr., Polym. Prepr., Am. Chem. Soc, Div. Polym. Chem., 1968, 9 (1), 382.
94. C. C. Price and H. Fukutani, J. Polym. ScL, Part A-l, 1969, 6, 2653.
95. L. P. Blanchard, K. T. Dinh, J. Moinard and F. Tahiani, J. Polym. ScL, Part A-l, 1972, 10, 1353.
96. A. Stolarzewicz, Makromol. Chem., 1986, 187, 745.
97. N. P. Doroshenko and Yu. L. Spirin, VysokomoL Soedin., Ser. A, 1970, 12, 2481.
98. M. J. Bechet, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1971, 3593, 3596.
99. Z. Jedlinsky, A. Stolarzewicz, P. Szewczyk and R. Tymczynski, Polym. Bull. (Berlin), 1980, 2, 555.
100. G. Ezra and A. Zilkha, J. Polym. ScL, Part A-l, 1970, 8, 1343.
101. S. Boileau, H. Cheradame, P. Guerin and P. Sigwalt, J. Chim. Phys. Phys.-Chim. Biol., 1972, 69, 1420.
102. S. Boileau, H. Cheradame, W. Lapeyre, L. Sousselier and P. Sigwalt, J. Chim. Phys. Phys.-Chim. Biol., 1973, 70, 879.
103. P. Guerin, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Eur. Polym. J., 1974, 10, 13.
104. A. D. Aliev, B. A. Krentsel, G. M. Mamediarov, I. P. Solomatina and E. P. Tiurina, Eur. Polym. J., 1971, 7, 1721.
105. A. D. Aliev, I. P. Solomatina and B. A. Krentsel, Macromolecules, 1973, 6, 797.
106. A. D. Aliev, I. P. Solomatina, A. Yu. Koshevnik, Zh. Zhumabayev and B. A. Krentsel, VysokomoL Soedin., Ser. A, 1977,
19, 173.
107. A. D. Aliev, B. A. Krentsel and S. L. Alieva, Eur. Polym. J., 1983, 19, 71.
108. J. P. Favier, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Eur. Polym. J., 1968, 4, 3.
109. S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Eur. Polym. J., 1967, 3, 57.
110. P. Guerin, P. Hemery, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Eur. Polym. J., 1971, 7, 953.
111. P. Hemery, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Eur. Polym. J., 1971, 7, 1581.
112. P. Sigwalt, in 'Kinetics and Mechanism of Poly reactions', Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1971, p. 251.
113. G. Tersac, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, J. Chim. Phys. Phys.-Chim. Biol., 1968, 65, 1141.
114. P. Guerin, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Eur. Polym. J., 1971, 7, 1119.
115. E. Campos-Lopez, A. Leon-Gross and M. A. Ponce Velez, J. Polym. ScL, Polym. Chem. Ed., 1973, 11, 3021.
116. M. Morton, R. F. Kammereck and L. J. Fetters, Br. Polym. J., 1971, 3, 120.
117. P. Hemery, S. Boileau, P. Sigwalt and B. Kaempf, J. Polym. ScL, Polym. Lett. Ed., 1975, 13, 49.
118. P. Hemery, These Dt. d'Etat, Universite P. et M. Curie, Paris, 1976.
119. G. Tersac, S. Boileau and P. Sigwalt, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1970, 2537.
120. B. Vidal, These Dt. 3° Cycle, Universite P. et M. Curie, Paris, 1975.