Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.tuv-sud.com/nucleartraining
nucleartraining@tuvsud.com
1 Introduction
2 Risk-Based Thinking
4 Risk Analysis
5 Summary
Risk-Based
Thinking
Preventive action to Analysing any
eliminate potential nonconformity that
nonconformities does occur
1 Introduction
2 Risk-Based Thinking
4 Risk Analysis
5 Summary
Purpose of
Risk-Based
Thinking
Determine factors
that could cause the Make maximum use
QMS to deviate from Put in place of opportunities
planned results preventive controls
to minimize negative
effects
1 Introduction
2 Risk-Based Thinking
4 Risk Analysis
5 Summary
Goal: Development of a documented risk management method, related to the achievement of applicable requirements,
including:
a. assignment of responsibilities for risk management,
b. definition of risk criteria
c. identification, assessment and communication of risks throughout product realization including supply chain,
d. identification, implementation and management of actions to mitigate risks that exceed the defined risk acceptance
criteria.
e. tolerability of risks remaining after implementation of actions
▪ different types of risk analysis and assessment methods are listed in CEI/ISO 31010
1 Introduction
2 Risk-Based Thinking
4 Risk Analysis
5 Summary
▪ Determination of ITNS items and activities: base for the graded approach to the application of quality requirements.
▪ Chose one topic and identify possible dangerous situations concerning the topic
(1) Financial
(2) Contractual
(3) Purchasing
(4) Project Management
(5) Technical and Realization
(6) Human aspects
TOPIC Examples
(2) Contractual Poor understanding of customer needs or specifications
Difficult to meet contractual obligations in the project or order
Poor analysis of the impact of changes
Poor analysis of requirements for quality assurance
Poor analysis of the impact of documentary constraints
Constraints imposed for unrealistic calendar or without margins
Source: ISO/TR 4450
TOPIC Examples
(3) Purchasing Unavailability of materials/components
Purchase price of materials/components incompatible with the budget
Poor transmission of contractual requirements to subcontractors
Suppliers are imposed or not permitted by the customer
Unfavourable political developments in the country of the subcontractor
Supply „single source“
Misunderstanding of the projects needs by subcontractors
Insufficient ability of the supplier as part of projects requirements or order
Assessment
Occurrence Qualitative Quantitative
Level (P=likelihood)
1 Low P < 20%
2 Medium 20% ≤ P < 40%
3 High 40% ≤ P < 60%
4 Critical P > 60%
Impact on
Severity Safety Conformity Performance Delivery Planning (D) Costs
Level (C)
1 Low Low D < 5% C < 2%
2 Medium Medium 5% ≤ D < 10% 2% ≤ C < 5%
unacceptable
3 High High 10% ≤ D < 20% 5% ≤ C < 10%
4 Critical Critical D > 20% C > 10%
#1: …
#2: …
1 Introduction
2 Risk-Based Thinking
4 Risk Analysis
5 Summary
This document and any information it contains shall not be used for any other
purpose than the one for which they were provided.
’’
Stock photos and ClipArt's: Licensed by TÜV SÜD.com Image Database.