Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT 1
Definition
The limitations of a study are defined as any characteristics, traits, actions, or influences that
could impact the research process, and therefore its findings. Types of limitations can differ
significantly, ranging from internal aspects, such as flaws in design and methodology, to external
influences that a researcher was unable to control. A study may have several limitations that
impact how its findings withstand validity tests, the generalizability of conclusions, or the
appropriateness of the study design in a specific context.
Many new researchers fear openly and clearly stating the limitations of their studies as they
worry it will undermine the validity and relevance of their work for readers and other
professionals in the field. That is not the case, as a statement of study limitations allows the
reader to better understand the conditions of the study and challenges that the researcher has
encountered. Not including this section, or leaving out vital aspects, which can address anything
from sampling to the specific research methodology, can be detrimental to the general research
field as it establishes an incomplete and potentially fallacious depiction of the research. Within
academia, it is expected that all studies have limitations to some extent. Including this section
demonstrates a comprehensive and holistic understanding of the research process and topic by
the author.
A discussion of limitations should be a subjective learning process that assesses the magnitude,
and critically evaluates the extenuating impact of the said limitations. This leads to the
importance of stating limitations as it creates opportunities for both the original author and other
researchers to improve the quality and validity of any future studies. Including limitations is
based on the core principle of transparency in scientific research, with the purpose to maintain
mutual integrity and promote further progress in similar studies.
Descriptions of Various Limitations
Sample size or profile – sampling is one of the most common limitations mentioned by
researchers. This is often due to the difficulty of finding a perfect sample that both fits the size
parameters and necessary characteristics of the study to ensure generalizability of results.
Various sampling techniques are also open to error and bias, which may potentially influence
outcomes. Sometimes researchers are faced with limitations in selecting samples and resort to
selective picking of participants or, the opposite, including irrelevant people in the general pool
to reach the necessary total.
Bias – a potential limitation that can affect all researchers. This is a limitation that researchers
attempt to avoid by ensuring there are no conflicts of interest, lack of any emotional or
prejudiced attitudes towards the topic, and establishing a level of oversight by referring to an
ethics committee and peer-review procedures. As humans, it is inherent that bias will be present
to some extent. However, it is the responsibility of the researcher to remain objective and attempt
to control any potential bias or inaccuracies throughout every stage of the research process.
Summary
Limitations are an inherent part of any research study. Therefore, it is generally accepted in
academia to acknowledge various limitations as part of the research process. Issues may vary,
ranging from sampling and literature review, to methodology and bias. However, there is a
structure for identifying these elements, discussing them, and offering insight or alternatives on
how limitations can be mitigated. This not only enhances the process of the research but also
helps readers gain a comprehensive understanding of a study’s conditions.