Chapter 7

Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents

Felisa González, Esther Romera, Antonio Ballester, María Luisa Blázquez,

Jesús Ángel Muñoz and Camino García-Balboa

Abstract  Algae belong to the kingdom Protista which contains all the Eucaryotes
organisms that cannot be classified within other eucaryotic kingdoms: Fungi, Ani-
malia or Plantae. They are autotrophic organisms that carry out an oxygenic photo-
synthesis. Maybe the most well-known use of algae since ancient times is in food,
especially in the Asian coast. In addition, the phycocolloid industry uses algae as
raw material in the manufacture of a wide variety of additive products in the cos-
metic, pharmaceutical and food industries. Lately algae have been proposed for the
treatment of wastewaters due to their high heavy metal sorption capacity. Although,
traditionally they have been used in less extent than other biomass, algae have
important advantages such as: high efficiency metal removal, non-toxic chemical
sludge and low cost. The main kinds of algae (green, red and brown) have constitu-
ents (cellulose, carrageenan and alginate, respectively) that provide binding sites
such as: hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino and sulfhydryl, which are responsible for the
selectivity of these biomass for heavy metals. In this way, Fucus spiralis, a brown
alga very common in the Galician coast, has been proved very selective in the sorp-
tion of copper versus other heavy metals. Like for other types of biomass, one way
to improve its biosorbent capacity is by pre-treatment with different reagents.
Keywords  Algae types • Binding sites • Sorption uptake • Biosorbent pretreatment

F. González ()
Departamento de Ciencia de los Materiales e Ingeniería Metalúrgica, Facultad de Ciencias
Químicas, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain
e-mail: fgonzalezg@quim.ucm.es

P. Kotrba et al. (eds.), Microbial Biosorption of Metals, 159

DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0443-5_7, © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
160 F. González et al.

7.1  Introduction

7.1.1  A Few Words About Taxonomy

Algae are a diverse group of organisms that cause mayhem even when professional
systematists and biologists try to define them in relation to other organism. Through
the years, algal classification has been very unstable. Placements at the kingdom and
lower levels are currently still dynamic. It is interesting to trace the changes in their
position in the hierarchy of life. Algae, like bacteria and fungi, were often assigned
to the plant kingdom. Properties for including the algae into the plant kingdom were
their ability to make their own food by photosynthesis, their structural similarity to
land plants and the fact that the larger forms were observed to be sedentary.
Unicellular creatures that move and ingest food—protozoa—were called ani-
mals. Microbes such as Euglena that move but are photosynthetic were claimed by
both botanists and zoologists, and showed up in the taxonomies of both the plant
and animal kingdoms. Clearly, the 2-Kingdom System was riddled with conceptual
and operational problems. Technological advances, such refined microscopy further
proved that the system was oversimplified and therefore not widely acceptable.
In 1969, Robert H. Whittaker suggested a scheme with additional kingdoms as
an alternative to the 2-Kingdom System (Animalia and Plantae). The 5-Kingdom
System proposed considered Monera, Protista, Plants, Animals and Fungi. Most
algae are traditionally considered as a plant subkingdom within the 5-kingdom clas-
sification. However, their phylogenetic relationship and evolutionary lineages are
still not reflected adequately by the 5-kingdom system.
Major revisions were made to the 5-Kingdom System to form the 8-Kingdom
System. The 8-Kingdom System was the most recently proposed and also it is the
most controversial. Its construction stresses that the term “algae” wrongly tried to
combine organisms with such diversity and differential evolutionary histories into a
single group. Under the 8-Kingdom System, algal members are dispersed in vastly
different kingdoms that are distinct from each other. Based on advanced genetic and
ultrastructural studies, this system is generally supported by a handful of biologists
who advocate the need to either elevate various algal members to a higher taxo-
nomic status or to qualify the more distinctively. This has led to the reorganization
of many groups in such a way that their diagnostic characters suggest their evolu-
tionary relationship to other groups accurately.

7.1.2  Algae Habitat and Uses

Algae are a very diverse group of all photosynthetic organisms that are not plants.
Algae are important in marine, freshwater, and some terrestrial ecosystems. Sea-
weeds are large marine algae. Algae may be unicellular, colonial, or multicellular.
Some algae, like the diatoms, are microscopically small. Other algae, like kelp, are
7  Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents 161

as big as trees. Some algae, the phytoplankton, drift in the water. Other algae, the
epiphytic or benthic algae, grow attached to rocks, docks, plants, and other solid
objects (Raven et al. 1999; Lembi and Waaland 1988).
Probably the most well-known use of algae since ancient times is the food indus-
try, especially in the Asian coast (Korea is the world’s largest consumer). The spe-
cies more consumed are: Undaria pinnatifida, Himantalia elongata, Ascophyllum
nodosum, Gelidium sesquipedale, Porphydadioica and Palmaria palmata. Algae
in Eastern cultures have also been used in fertilizers, glass manufacturing or iodine
extraction.
In the Western world, algae were initially used as food by human populations of
low standard of living. Paradoxically, it was in these countries where algae acquired
a major relevance in the modern industry. In the middle of the twentieth century, the
phycocolloid industry was developed. That industry is characterized by the use of
algae as raw material for the manufacture of a wide variety of compounds used as
additives in the cosmetic, pharmaceutical and food industries. More recently, espe-
cially in the last decade, there has been an increasing interest for algae as biosorbent
material due to its high sorption capacity and its almost unlimited availability in
oceans.
However, in the field of biosorption, it has not been until recently that biomass
of different origin have been used, such as: waste materials of food and agricultural
industry (Nilanjana 2008). Traditionally, bacteria and fungi have been the biomass
more studied. Unlikely, algae have been used in less proportion.
According to our own statistical study, of the 2057 bibliographic records found
on biosorption until 2004 only 315 were related to algae that is 15.31% of the total
(Romera et al. 2006). In addition, despite the great variety of algae in nature, the
number of species studied for its sorption properties and the works providing equi-
librium parameters are rather scarce. Considering the latter aspect, Table 7.1 shows
the range of values collected from literature of the maximum sorption uptake (qmax)
and constant b, related with the affinity of the biomass (green, red or brown algae)
for the metal. Both parameters were derived from the Langmuir model applied to
experimental results obtained with dead biomass without any treatment. Such table
provides information on the more frequently algae used and the metal commonly
studied. These data seems consistent with the excellent biosorbent capacity of algae
and makes them a potentially attractive raw material.
An evidence of the interest for using algae is the increasing number of research
groups working on biosorption of metals with algae (Apiratikul and Pavasant 2008;
Grimm et  al. 2008; Akhtar et al. 2008; Deng et  al. 2007; Han et  al. 2007; Vilar
et al. 2007; Al-Rub et al. 2006; Aksu and Dönmez 2006; Gupta et al. 2006; Luo
et al. 2006; Martins et al. 2006; Vijayaraghavan et al. 2006; Aksu and Acikel 2000;
Figueira et al. 2000a). These authors have investigated different aspects of the pro-
cess such as the use of free or immobilized biomass in batch or column experiments,
respectively; the factors affecting the process (pH, metal initial concentration, metal
speciation, biomass concentration, temperature, presence of other cations and an-
ions, pretreatment of biomass); mathematical modelling; mechanistics; thermo-
dynamic and kinetic aspects; and the possibility of biomass regeneration using
162 F. González et al.

Table 7.1   Sorption parameters of biomass without a previous treatment in monometallic systems.
(According to Romera et al. 2006)
Alga Metal qmax (m mol/g) B (l/m mol)
Ascophyllum nodosum (B) Cd2+ 0.34–1.91 6.29–31.24
Ni2+ 1.35–2.32 3.28–9.16
Pb2+ 1.31–2.31 21.75–42.06
Chaetomorha linum (G) Cd2+ 0.48 1.43
Chlorella miniata (G) Cu2+ 0.366 26.586
Ni2+ 0.21–1.02 2.93–16–63
Chlorella vulgaris (G) Cd2+ 0.30 56
Pb2+ 0.47 38
Zn2+ 0.37 6
Cu2+ 0.25–0.76 4.44–13–34
Cladophora glomerata (G) Pb2+ 0.355 447.53
Chondrus crispus (R) Ni2+ 0.443 12.920
Pb2+ 0.941 3.315
Codium fragile (G) Cd2+ 0.082,7 1.124
Codium taylori (G) Ni2+ 0.099 29.06
Pb2+ 1.815 5.38
Corallina officinalis (R) Cd2+ 0.264,2 21.356
Fucus vesiculosus (B) Cd2+ 0.649 2.360
Ni2+ 0.392 16.140
Pb2+ 1.10–2.90 32.11–62.77
Galaxaura marginata (R) Ni2+ 0.187 4.638
Pb2+ 0.121 9.110
Gracilaria corticata (R) Pb2+ 0.201,7 480.68
Gracilaria changüí (R) Cd2+ 0.23 9.65
Gracilaria corticata (R) Pb2+ 0.260,6 327.36
Gracilaria edulis (R) Cd2+ 0.24 4.82
Gracilaria salicornia (R) Cd2+ 0.16 9.04
Padina sp. (B) Cd2+ 0.53 5.37
Padina gymnospora (B) Ni2+ 0.170 3.933
Pb2+ 0.314 108.980
Padina tetrastomatica (B) Pb2+ 1.049 149.177
Cd2+ 0.53 4.65
Polysiphonia violacea Pb2+ 0.492,3 2,734.908
Porphira columbina (R) Cd2+ 0.404,8 4.496
Sargassum sp. (B) Cd2+ 1.40 6.52
Cu2+ 1.08 0.236,4
Sargassum baccularia (B) Cd2+ 0.74 4.67
Sargassum fluitans (B) Ni2+ 0.409 17.260
Pb2+ 1.594 44.340
Sargassum hystrix (B) Pb2+ 1.375,5 89.09
Sargassum natans (B) Cd2+ 1.174 23.490
Ni2+ 0.409 6.980
Pb2+ 1.15–1.22 54.07–116.03
Sargassum siliquosum (B) Cd2+ 0.73 6.60
Sargassum vulgare (B) Ni2+ 0.085 30.880
Pb2+ 1.100 19.270
B brown, G green and R red
7  Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents 163

Table 7.2   Advantages and disadvantages of using algal biomass for heavy metals removal from
wastewater. (According to Brinza et al. 2007)
Advantages Disadvantages
• No need to synthesise the product • If dead biomass used, energy needed for
• Can be applied in wastewater with higher drying
metal concentrations than for membrane • Microalgae need to be inmobilized
processes • Microalgae have limited applicability in
• High efficiency of metals removal batch systems
• High uptake capacity
• Biomass can be regenerated
• Biomass can be re-used in many adsorp-
tion/desorption cycles
• Selectivity for heavy metals ions
• Macroalgal biomass does not need to be
inmobilized
• No toxic chemical sludge generated
• Few chemicals needed for desorption and
regeneration of biosorbent
• Can be used in continuous and discontinu-
ous regimes
• If dead biomass used, no oxygen or nutri-
ent supply required
• Suitable for aerobic and anaerobic effluent
treatment units
• Can be used all year round
• Low cost

different extractant reagents. In the last decade, several noteworthy revisions on the
use of algae have been published (Brinza et al. 2007; Mehta and Gaur 2005; Davis
et al. 2003). Further interesting information on both the structure of algae cell walls,
directly related to sorption mechanisms, and process yields can be found in three
recent works (Lesmana et al. 2009; Wang and Chen 2009; Nilanjana et al. 2008).
Table 7.2 summarizes the main advantages and disadvantages of the use of algal
biomass for metal uptake from wastewaters (Brinza et  al. 2007). On that basis,
algae can be considered as an alternative to conventional adsorbent materials used
in the treatment of effluents contaminated with heavy metals. Nevertheless, further
research studies are necessary on aspects such as: the selectivity of algal species,
the design of new immobilization matrices for microalgae, interferences with other
compounds in the effluents and modelling and simulation of processes.

7.2  Types of Algae

7.2.1  The Biodiversity of Algae: Classification

Algae classification may consider several aspects such as the habitat or the co-
lour—which depends on the living site and the receiving radiation. Other criteria
such as the nature of chlorophyll(s), the cell wall chemistry, flagellation, form in
164 F. González et al.

which food or assimilatory products of photosynthesis are stored, cell morphology,

habitat, reproductive structures, life story patterns, etc, are other characteristics that
could have been used for the classification of algae. Other characteristics used to
classify algae have been the nature of chlorophyll(s) present, the carbon reserve
polymers produced, the cell wall structure and the type of motility (Wang and Chen
2009). All algae contain chlorophyll a. Some, however, also contain other chloro-
phylls that differ in minor ways from chlorophyll a. The presence of these additional
chlorophylls is characteristic of particular algal groups. The nature of the reserve
polymer synthesized as a result of photosynthesis is another differential aspect be-
tween the different groups.
Table 7.3 presents a classification of algae (Wang and Chen 2009) based on the
type of pigments, cell wall and stored food materials. The potential of the different
species as biosorbents of metal removal was taken into consideration.
The main characteristics of the major five groups are as follows:
1. Green Algae. They are the algae most closely related to plants. They have the
same pigments (chlorophyll a and b and carotenoids), the same chemicals in
their cell walls (cellulose), and the same storage product (starch) as plants. Green
algae may be unicellular or form filaments, nets, sheets, spheres, or complex
mosslike structures. There are both freshwater and marine species. Some spe-
cies of green algae live on snow, or in symbiotic associations as lichens, or with
sponges or other aquatic animals. Edible green algae include Chlorella and the
so called “sea lettuce”. There are at least seventeen thousand species of green
algae.
2. Diatoms. They are often regarded as the most beautiful of the algae. Each diatom
has a cell wall made of glass that is very finely etched with a species-specific
pattern of dots and lines. The patterns on the diatom cell walls are so precise that
they were used for years to test the optics of new microscopes. Diatoms are also
the most abundant algae in the open ocean and responsible for about one-quarter
of all the oxygen gas produced on the earth each year. Diatom populations often
bloom in lakes in the spring, providing a major food for zooplankton, forming
the base of the aquatic food chain. There are over one hundred thousand species
of diatoms.
3. Red Algae. They are almost exclusively marine and include many edible and
economically important species, including nori and laver. These algae are also
the source of carrageenan and agar, which are used as food thickeners and stabi-
lizers. Red algae are mostly large, complex seaweeds. There are four thousand
to six thousand species.
4. Brown Algae. They algae are most exclusively marine and include the largest
and most complex seaweeds. Kelp, for example, may be more than 60 m high,
and forms dense underwater forests off the California coast. Other important
brown algae include the rockweeds and Sargassum, for which the Sargasso Sea
is named. There are about fifteen hundred species of brown algae.
5. Dinoflagellates. They are unicellular algae with armor made of cellulose and
flagella that cause them to spin as they swim. Dinoflagellates are found in both
Table 7.3   A classification of major groups of algae and their primary characteristics. (According to Wang and Chen 2009)
Group Common name Morphology Pigments Typical rep- Carbon reserve Cell walls Major habitats Kingdom
resentative materials
Chrysophyta Yellow-green Unicellular Chlorophylls a Navacul sp. Lipids Many have two Freshwater, Protista
and golden- and c overlapping marine, soil (single cell
brown algae; components or colonia;
diatoms made of silica eukaryotic)
Euglenophyta Euglenoids Unicellular, Pho- Chlorophylls a Euglena sp. Pramylon No wall present Freshwater, a few Protista
tosynthetic and b (β-1,2- marine
euglenoid glucan)
7  Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents

flagellates
Pyrrhophyta Dinoflagellates Protista
Charophyta Stoneworts Protista
Chlorophyta Green algae Unicellular to Chlorophylls a Chlamydo­ Starch (α-1,4- Cellulose Freshwater, soil, a Protista
leafy and b monas sp. glucan) few marine
Phaeophyta Brown algae Filamentous Chlorophylls Laminaria Laninarin Cellulose Marine Plantae (mul-
leafy, a and c, sp. (β-1,3- ticellular:
occasionally xanthophylls glucan), eukaryotic)
massive and mannitol
plantlike
Rhodophyta Red algae Unicellular, Chlorophylls a Polysiphonia Floridean Cellulose Marine Plantae
filamentous and d, phy- sp. starch
to leafy cocyanim, (α-1,4- and
phycoery- α-1,6-
thrin glucan),
fluoridoside
(glycerol-
galactoside)
165
166 F. González et al.

freshwater and marine ecosystems. Some species of dinoflagellates emit an eerie

blue when disturbed, called bioluminescence. Other dinoflagellates are toxic and
responsible for red tides and outbreaks of shellfish poisoning. There are two
thousand to four thousand species of dinoflagellates.

7.2.2  Algal Metal Binding Sites

In biosorption various algae have been used and investigated as biosorbents for
metal removal. Metal biosorption mainly depends on the components of the bio-
mass cell, especially the cell surface and the spatial structure of the cell wall. Pep-
tidoglycan, teichoic acids and lipoteichoic acids are all important chemical compo-
nents of bacterial surface structures. Various polysaccharides, including cellulose,
chitin, alginate, glycan, etc. present in fungi or algae cell walls, have been proved
to play a very important role in metal binding for certain kinds of biomass. Some
functional groups have been found to bind metal ions, especially carboxyl group.
There are evidences that confirm that functional groups containing O-, N-, S-, or
P-, participate directly in binding certain metals (Wang and Chen 2009). The car-
boxyl, hydroxyl, sulphate and amino groups in algal cell wall polysaccharides act
as binding sites for metals (Lesmana et al. 2009). In addition, the acid treatment of
algae can dissolve polysaccharide compounds in the outer layer of the cell wall to a
certain extent, thus creating additional binding sites (usually amino groups).
Table 7.4 summarizes the most representative functional groups and classes of
organic compounds in biomass potentially involved in biosorption processes (Wang
and Chen 2009). The symbol R is shorthand for residue, and its placement in the
formula indicates that is attachment at that site varies from one compound to an-
other, according to Talaro and Talaro (2002).
Some active sites involved in metal uptake can be determined by using tech-
niques of titration, infrared and Raman spectroscopy (XPS), electron microscopy
(scanning and/or transmission), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X-ray diffrac-
tion analysis (XRD), X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (XAFS), etc.
(Wang and Chen 2009). The most important of these groups have been summarized
by Volesky (2007) and include: carbonyl (ketone), carboxyl, sulfhydryl (thiol), sul-

Table 7.4   Functional groups Functional group Class of compounds

and classes of organic com-
Hydroxyl Alcohols, carbohydrates
pounds in biomass. (Accord-
ing to Talaro and Talaro Carboxyl Fatty acids, proteins, organic acids
2002) Amino Proteins, nucleic acids
Ester Lipids
Sulfhydryl Cysteine (amino acid), proteins
Carbonyl, terminal end Aldehydes, polysaccharides
Carbonil, internal Ketones, polysaccharides
Phosphate DNA, RNA, ATP
7  Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents 167

fonate, thioeter, amine, secondary amine, amide, imine, imidazole, phosphonate,

phosphodiester (Volesky 2007).
Although Algae are a large and diverse group of simple plant-like organisms,
ranging from unicellular to multicellular forms, which can be seen in bodies of
water and terrestrial environments, a classification considering three main types is
widely extended. This classification emphasizes the cellular composition and prin-
cipal sorption active sites.
Some specific examples of metal biosoprtion with different algae are given in the
following paragraphs. It has been preferred to maintain the classification widely ex-
tended considering four main groups: marine brown macroalgae, marine red mac-
roalgae, fresh water green microalgae and marine green macroalgae (Lesmana et al.
2009). The particular binding site for each species has also been specified.
Marine Green Macroalgae  Diverse marine green macroalgae—such Caulerpa
lentillifera or Cladophora fascicularis—are described as biosorbents for divalent
cations such as Cu(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) (Pasavant et al. 2006; Deng et al. 2006).
The possible functional groups involved in metal sorption properties of Caulerpa
lentillifera were carboxylic acids, amines, amides, sulfonyl and sulfonate. In the
case of Cladophora fascicularis, amino, phosphate and carboxyl were the main
groups involved in biosorption processes.
Fresh Water Green Microalgae  Several types of green microalgae have also been
employed for the removal of heavy metals from solutions (Lesmana 2009). Diva-
lent metals such as Hg, Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu, Zn have been tested with Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii, Chlorella miniata, Chlorella vulgaris, Cladonia rangiformis and Fucus
spiralis. Trivalent (Fe, Cr) and hexavalent cations (Cr) have also been removed
using Chlorella vulgaris, Spirulina platensis and Chlorella miniata and vulgaris,
respectively. The evaluation of Ni(II) and Cu(II) adsorption onto Sphaeroplea algae
and its acid treated form was performed by Rao et al. (2005).
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is a motile single cell green algae whose cell wall
structure is composed of hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins. The use of this alga
as a biosorbent for heavy metals has been attempted by Tuzun et  al. (2005). In
their study, they found that the functional groups responsible for biosorption onto
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells were amino, carboxylic acid, hydroxyl and car-
bonyl groups.
Chlorella is a genus of single cell green algae belonging to the phylum Chlo-
rophyta. Chlorella vulgaris is of particular interest as a biosorbent. This planktonic
unicellular green alga has been widely exploited as a food supplement. Interesting
sorption properties exhibited by this alga originate from its porous cell wall, al-
lowing the free passage of molecules and ions in aqueous solution. Moreover, its
cell wall´s constituents provide an array of ligands with different functional groups
capable of binding various heavy metals (Lesmana et al. 2009).
Marine Red Macroalgae  The red marine macroalgae Gelidium sesquipedale has
been employed to study the complex mechanisms involved in biosorption processes
(Vilar et al. 2008).
168 F. González et al.

Marine Brown Macroalgae  The cell walls of brown algae generally contain three
components (Lesmana et al. 2009): (1) cellulose, the structural support; (2) alginic
acid, a polymer of mannuronic and guluronic acids and the corresponding salts of
sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium; and (3) sulphated polysaccharides.
Thus, carboxyl and sulphate are the predominant active groups in this alga. An
example of the biotechnological application of this alga is related to Laminaria
japonica. A modified version was optimally used for biosoption of lead (Pb) due
to the increasing amount of carboxylic acid groups exposed after the modification
process (Luo et al. 2006).

7.3  C
 omparative Study on Metal Sorption Uptakes  
and Affinities by Different Types of Algae

One of the mathematical models more cited in the literature is the Langmuir model
that provides a quantification of the biosorption phenomenon, such is the case for
algae used as biosorbents. The maximum sorption uptake and the equilibrium con-
stant or affinity degree of the biomass for the adsorbate can be derived from that
model. The equilibrium constant represents a fundamental tool in order to define
the chemical equilibria in this type of systems. From the knowledge of those con-
stants it is possible to predict the behaviour of different biomass with a given metal.
Therefore, this could be a useful tool in order to make the right choice between dif-
ferent biosorbents for each occasion.
On the other hand, the great difference in the chemical composition of the cell
walls of the different types of algae is also responsible for its different biosorbent
behaviour. Our studies in this field have corroborated such idea after studying the
sorption uptake of a series of algae with five toxic metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn)
commonly found in industrial effluents (Romera et al. 2007). Table 7.5 collects the
parameters of Langmuir, qmax and b, obtained with two green ( Codium vermilara
and Spirogyra insignis), two red ( Asparagopsis armata and Chondrus crispus) and
two brown algae ( Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus spiralis). Two important con-
clusions were drawn from that study: (1) there is, in general, a similar decreasing
order of affinity of the biomass for the five metals tested, independently of the alga
used; which is in agreement with the proposal of Chong and Volesky (1996) that the
binding of metals to active sites on the cell walls of the biomass is related to some
intrinsic properties of the own metal ion such as: ionic radii and electronegativity.
(2) The brown algae present the highest sorption uptake followed by red algae,
especially those with carragenates in their cell walls ( Chondrus crispus), and the
worse sorption uptake correspond to green algae. The presence of alginates in cell
walls of brown algae, like carragenates in red algae, is responsible for the metal
binding on the biomass. Although that is the case for most of the studies reported in
the literature, the values of qmax for brown algae are higher than for other kinds of
algae (Romera et al. 2006).
Table 7.5   Values of Langmuir constants
Algae Cadmium Nickel Zinc Copper Lead
b qmax b (l/m mol) qmax b qmax b qmax b qmax
(l/m mol) (m mol/g) (m mol/g) (l/m mol) (m mol/g) (l/m mol) (m mol/g) (l/m mol) (m mol/g)
7  Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents

C.odium vermilara 11.15 0.19 5.34 0.22   1.80 0.36   8.92 0.27   23.45 0.30
Spirogyra insignis 13.59 0.20 2.57 0.30   2.58 0.32   5.51 0.30 117.87 0.25
Asparadopsis. armata 10.61 0.29 7.23 0.29   4.92 0.33   8.37 0.33    9.10 0.31
Chondrus crispus   6.37 0.67 2.83 0.63   4.63 0.70   2.47 0.64    2.08 0.98
Fucus spiralis 12.67 1.02 7.92 0.85   6.94 0.81 10.87 1.12   26.72 0.98
Ascophyllum nodosum 17.34 0.78 7.90 0.74 14.38 0.64 10.39 0.93   19.15 0.86
169
170 F. González et al.

Despite that, there is a lack of experimental data on multimetallic systems. In

our studies, we have only employed the brown alga Fucus spiralis (Romera et al.
2008a) in an attempt to determine the degree of interference and/or competence
between different metals for the same active sites of the biomass. We have studied
both bimetallic and trimetallic systems and experimental data could be adjusted to
the multimetallic type-Langmuir model given by the following expression (Eq. 7.1):

qmax bn Ce (Mn )
 q(Mn ) = (7.1)
1 + b1 Ce (M1) + b2 Ce (M2 ) + · · · + bn Ce (Mn )

Table 7.6 collects the values of qmax, b1 and b2 for ten bimetallic systems obtained
from the combination of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn. The first relevant fact is that the
maximum sorption uptake of the biomass remained practically constant around
1 m mol/g. That is an indication that the number of active sites present in the alga
is fixed and independent of the solution tested. Nevertheless, the highest values of
qmax obtained corresponded to the systems performed with the metals showing a
higher affinity for the biomass and the lowest to the metals with a worse recovery
in monometallic systems.
A similar conclusion was reached in trimetallic systems. Thus, the ternary-type
Langmuir equation defined for the Cd-Ni-Cu system the following parameters:
qmax = 0.93, b(Cd) = 6.39 l/m mol, b(Ni) = 1.82 l/m mol and b(Cu) = 17.89 l/m mol,
i.e. the maximum sorption uptake was achieved around 1 m mol/g and the affinity
order obtained from the values of b was the same that in the mono- and bimetallic
systems. Since the biosorption process depended on both the type of biomass and
the metal adsorbed, the alga had a limited number of binding sites with a different
preference for the metals tested. In fact, Fucus spiralis shown specificity for copper.
The treatment of sorption data using the MATLAB software is a useful tool to
obtain a graphic representation of the sorption isotherms and allows an analysis
on the competition between the different metals for the same sorption sites. For
instance, in the trimetallic system shown in Fig. 7.1, at higher copper concentra-
tion the sorption uptake of both Cd and Ni decreased significantly (Fig. 7.1a and
b); however, none of these two metals affected the sorption of Cu (Fig. 7.1c and d).

Table 7.6   Values of Langmuir constants in ten bimetallic systems

qmax (m mol/g) b1 (l/m mol) b2 (l/m mol) R12 R22
Cd-Ni 0.75 21.79   5.32 0.99 0.99
Cd-Zn 0.80 21.50   7.57 0.99 0.95
Cd-Cu 0.96   7.28 17.61 0.97 0.98
Cd-Pb 1.09   3.03 44.25 0.81 0.86
Ni-Zn 0.64   9.89 12.61 0.94 0.99
Ni-Cu 0.92   1.98 18.66 0.85 0.98
Ni-Pb 0.97   1.03 93.46 0.69 0.70
Zn-Cu 0.95   1.98 15.70 0.71 0.99
Zn-Pb 1.04   1.36 50.00 0.70 0.84
Cu-Pb 1.07   5.48 44.44 0.92 0.89
7  Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents 171

0.8 0.8

0.6 0.6
q (Cd) [mmol/g]

q (Ni) [mmol/g]
0.4 0.4

0.2 0.2

0 0
2 3
1.5 1 2 1.5
1 0.8 1
0.6 1
0.5 0.4 0.5
0.2 Ce (Ni) [mmol/L]
Ce (Ni) [mmol/L] 0 0 0 0 Ce (Cd) [mmol/L]
Ce (Cd) [mmol/L]

1 1

0.8 0.8
q (Cu) [mmol/g]

q (Cu) [mmol/g]

0.6 0.6

0.4 0.4

0.2 0.2

0 0
2
1.5
1 1.5 2.5
1 0.8 2
0.6 1 1.5
0.5 0.4 0.5 1
0.2 0.5
Ce (Cu) [mmol/L] 0 0 Ce (Cu) [mmol/L] 0 Ce (Ni) [mmol/L]
Ce (Cd) [mmol/L] 0

Fig. 7.1   Sorption isotherms in the trimetallic system Cu-Cd-Ni. (According to Romera et  al.
2008a)

Therefore, copper was adsorbed on Fucus spiralis in the same proportion indepen-
dently of the presence of Cd and Ni and of its concentration.
All these results indicate that biosorption can be a very attractive process for the
decontamination of waters polluted with heavy metals and suggest the idea that bio-
mass, in this case algae, can be specific for a given metal. The specificity of Fucus
spiralis was corroborated in multimetallic systems and, as shown in Fig. 7.2, such
alga has a preference uptake for copper against the rest of metals tested.
In addition, we have also tested different binary and ternary combinations of al-
gae in order to check changes of behaviour with respect to single-algal systems. For
that purpose, a green ( Codium vermilara), a red ( Chondrus crispus) and a brown
alga ( Ascophyllum nodosum) were selected (Romera et al. 2008b). We found that
metal uptake was improved with any kind of mixture compared to the green alga but
not for the brown alga (Fig. 7.3). Again, these results confirmed that brown algae
presented better biosorbent characteristics than red or green algae. Furthermore,
172 F. González et al.

Fig. 7.2   Sorption uptake

values using metal concentra-
tions in Cd-Cu-Ni-Zn system.
(According to Romera et al.
2008a)

Fig. 7.3   Sorption of several metals with different algae (single and complex biomass)

metals with a worse single-algal sorption in multimetallic systems behaved better

when biomass (Fig. 7.4). These results suggest that the mixture of algae can be an
interesting choice for the treatment of real solutions that contain several metals
since algae usually are not solely found in nature.

7.4  Pretreatment of Algal Biomass

From the scientific point of view, physico-chemical modifications of biomass, par-

ticularly algae, could lead to better sorption uptakes, better metal yields or higher
mechanical stability. The literature describes a wide variety of reagents that could
be used for the pre-treatment of biomass: acids, alkalis, salts, organic compounds
(acetone, methanol, ethanol, formaldehyde, glutaraldeyde, etc), enzimes (lipase,
lisozine, alkaline phosphatase), metal chelates (EDTA) and distilled water (Nad-
7  Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents 173

Fig. 7.4   Specific sorption uptake of nickel in monometallic, bimetallic and trimetallic systems for
different algal biomass. (According to Romera et al. 2008b)

dafi and Saeedi 2009; Southichak et al. 2009; Yinghui et al. 2009; Mehta and Gaur
2005). In general, the action of these reagents can be summarized as follows: (1)
the biomass cleanup which facilitates the access of metal cations to the active cen-
tres; (2) the chemical modification of specific compounds of the biomass (proteins,
esters or polysaccharides) that promotes the formation of new active centres; (3)
the improvement of the binding efficiency between active centres and metals fa-
cilitating its ion exchange with some cations (protons, sodium or calcium) or the
formation of electrostatic bonds that modifies the total surface charge by increas-
ing the number of active groups with negative charge (carboxylic or nitrogenated)
and finally, (4) the increase of the structural stability of the biomass, principally
when using continuous flow reactors, by provoking the cross-linking of the biomass
through the formation of covalent bridges between their functional groups.
However, chemical modification of the biomass not always produces the desire
effects. Some methods, unlike others, were able to improve the metal uptake in com-
parison with the untreated biomass. Our studies with the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus
using HCl, CaCl2, formaldehyde, Na2CO3 and NaOH as pretreatment reagents (Rincon
et al. 2005) showed that only the pretreatment of the biomass with CaCl2 improved the
sorption yield of Cu, Pb and Ni by 38, 20 and 16%, respectively. On the other hand,
HCl and formaldehyde had no effect on the sorption uptake of the biomass and, con-
versely, the alkaline reagents provoked the metal precipitation by increasing pH.
Several studies have also shown the positive effect of pretreating algal biomass
with CaCl2 (Southichak 2008; Feng and Aldrich 2004; Kaewsarn and Yu 2001).
174 F. González et al.

According to them, calcium is responsible for the biosorption process through an

ion exchange mechanism. With respect to the treatment of the biomass with di-
lute acid, HCl has been the most frequently used to achieve the protonation of the
functional groups, although with dissimilar results. In some cases, such treatment
did not affect the sorption uptake of the alga, i.e. Fucus vesiculosus (Rincon et al.
2005); however, with the brown alga Cystoseira myrica its protonation with HCl
provoked a significant sorption increase of Cu2+ (Naddafi and Saeedi 2009) whereas
with Scenedesmus obiquus the use of HCl had a negative effect on the sorption of
U (Zhang et al. 1997).
Sometimes, the aim of a chemical modification of the biomass is to achieve
cross-linking of the polyssacharide chains in order to improve structural stability.
However, according to the literature this not always improve metal sorption uptake.
For instance, in a recent study (Lio et al. 2009), the pretreatment of the brown alga
Laminaria japonica with glutaraldehyde provoked the cross-linking but destroyed
some of the binding sites which decreased metal uptake compared with the raw
biomass; on the contrary, dimethyl sulphoxide increased the sorption uptake of Cd,
Zn, Cu and Ni.
Similar unequal effects have also been found with another pretreating reagent
frequently used as NaOH: a decrease of the metal sorption uptake due to the sol-
ubilization of different alginate forms (Figueira et  al. 2000b) or dissimilar metal
uptakes on Chlorella vulgaris treated with NaOH 0.1 mM which significantly im-
proved sorption of Cu but slightly decreased sorption of Ni (Mehta and Gaur 2001).
Therefore, there is not a generalized criterion that can be used whether on the
biomass or the right type of treatment to be employed. Then, the viability of the
pretreatment process should be considered for each specific case.

7.5  C
 omparison with Other Biosorbents and Future
Perspectives

Taking into account that, in general, biological materials present good metal up-
takes the next step should be to make a choice among the large number of different
types of biomass potentially available for biosorption. A considerable number of
bacteria, fungi, algae and yeasts, and different wastes and by-products of the agri-
culture and food industry have been investigated for their biosorbent metal proper-
ties (Das et  al. 2008). Indeed, the choice of the biosorbent should consider both
efficiency and economy.
The efficiency of the process will depend on the biomass chemical composi-
tion which varies significantly for different species within the same genus or order
(Gadd 2009). In this way, in our statistical study of 2004 the average values of qmax
published for five metals and different types of biomass (bacteria, fungi and algae)
was already an indication that algae had better metal sorption uptakes than the rest
of biomass (Fig. 7.5). Nevertheless, at that moment, the amount of data available
for algae was lower than for bacteria and fungi. In addition, in recent years there has
7  Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents 175

Fig. 7.5   Average values of

qmax obtained with different
types of biomass

been an increasing interest in the use of new sorbent and very efficient biomaterials,
mainly agriculture and industrial wastes which were not included in the mentioned
comparative study.
At present, the various bibliographic revisions on the sorption uptake by dif-
ferent biomass do not allow to assert which one is more effective due to the many
determining factors involved (Wang and Chen 2009; Das et al. 2008; Gadd 2009).
Table 7.7 shows sorption data of non-algal biomass frequently used in investiga-
tions classified according to the corresponding type: bacteria, fungi or plant wastes.

Table 7.7   Biosorption uptakes by biomass from various sources

qmax (m mol/g) References
Cu Cd Ni Pb Zn
Bacteria
Bacillus cereus 0.79 0.18 Pan et al. (2007)
Bacillus sp. 0.26 0.45 Wang and Chen (2009)
Geobacillus toebii 0.76 0.26 0.36 0.21 Ozdemir et al. (2009)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.36 0.38 0.38 Wang and Chen (2009)
Pseudomonas putida 1.53 0.07 0.27 0.27 Wang and Chen (2009)
Streptomyces rimosus 0.58 0.15 1.22 Wang and Chen (2009)
Fungi
Aspergillus niger 0.08 0.15 Ahluwalia and Goyal
(2007)
Mucor rouxii 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.08 Ahluwalia and Goyal
(2007)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae 0.16 0.61 Ahluwalia and Goyal
(2007)
Rhizopus arrhizus 0.15 0.24 0.31 0.27 0.21 Ahluwalia and Goyal
(2007)
Penicillium chrysogenum 0.14 0.10 1.41 0.56 0.10 Wang and Chen (2009)
Plant or agricultural wastes
Lemon peel 0.47 0.87 Lesmana et al. (2009)
Orange peel 0.33 Lesmana et al. (2009)
Olive pomace 0.48 0.10 Lesmana et al. (2009)
Rice husk 0.22 0.07 0.21 Lesmana et al. (2009)
Saw dust 0.22 0.65 0.18 Ngah and Hanafiah (2008)
Sugar cane bagasse 1.79 1.68 0.95 Ngah and Hanafiah (2008)
176 F. González et al.

The comparison of these data with those for some algae (Tables 7.1 and 7.5) suggest
that algae, in general, and brown algae in particular, are promising biosorbents for
heavy metals. Furthermore, algae are natural products collected in large amounts,
especially the marine and brown ones. In addition, most algae are innocuous and
easily welcomed by the public and environmental agencies for its biotechnological
use since they do not generate toxic or non-removable by-products (Cuizano and
Navarro 2008).

References

Ahluwalia SS, Goyal D (2007) Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals
from wastewater. Biores Technol 98:2243–2257
Akhtar N, Iqbal M, Zafar SI, Iqbal J (2008) Biosorption characteristics of uinicellular green alga
Chlorella sorokiniana immobilized in loofa sponge for removal of Cr(III). J Environ Sci
20:231–239
Aksu Z, Acikel U (2000) Modeling of a single-staged bioseparation process for simultaneous re-
moval of iron(III) and chromium(VI) by using Chlorella vulgaris. Biochem Eng J 4:229–238
Aksu Z, Dönmez G (2006) Binary biosorption of cadmium (II) and nickel(II) onto dried Chlorella
vulgaris: co-ion effect on mono-component isotherm parameters. Process Biochem 41:860–
868
Al-Rub FAA, El-Naas MH, Ashour I, Al-Marzouqi (2006) Biosorption of copper by Chlorella vul-
garis from, single, binary and ternary metal aqueous solutions. Process Biochem 41:457–464
Apiratikul R, Pavasant P (2008) Batch and column studies on biosorption of heavy metals by
Caulerpa lentillifera. Biores Technol 99:2766–2777
Brinza L, Dring MJ, Gavrilescu M (2007) Marine micro algal species as biosorbents for heavy
metals. Environ Eng Manag J 6:237–251
Chong KH, Volesky B (1996) Metal biosorption equilibra in a ternary system. Biotechnol Bioeng
4:629–638
Cuizano NA, Navarro AE (2008) Biosorción de metales pesados por algas marinas: posible solu-
ción a la contaminación a bajas concentraciones. An Quim 104:120–125
Das J, Vimala R, Karthika P (2008) Biosorption of heavy metals—an overview. Indian J Biotech-
nol 7:159–169
Davis TA, Volesky B, Mucci A (2003) A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by
brown algae. Water Res 37:4311–4330
Deng L, Su Y, Su H, Wang X, Zhu X (2006) Biosorption of copper(II) and lead(II) from aqueous
solutions by nonliving green algae Cladophora fascicularis: equilibrium, kinetics and environ-
mental effects. Adsorption 2:267–277
Deng L, Zhu X, Wang X, Su Y, Su H (2007) Biosorption of copper(II) from aqueous solutions by
green alga Cladophora fascicularis. Biodegradation 18:393–402
Feng D, Aldrich C (2004) Adsorption of heavy metals by biomaterials derived from marine alga
Ecklonia maxima. Hydrometallurgy 73:1–10
Figueira MM, Volesky B, Azarian K, Ciminelli ST (2000a). Biosorption column performance with
a metal mixture. Environ Sci Technol 34:4320–4326
Figueira MM, Volesky B, Ciminelli VST, Roddick FA (2000b) Biosorption of metals in brown
seaweed biomass. Water Res 34:196–204
Gadd GM (2009) Biosorption: critical review of scientific rationale, environmental importance
and significance for pollution treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 84:13–28
Grimm A, Znzi R, Björnbom E, Cukierman AL (2008) Comparison of different types of biomasses
for copper biosorption. Biores Technol 99:2559–2565
7  Algal Biosorption and Biosorbents 177

Gupta VK, Rastogi A, Saini VK, Jain N (2006) Biosorption of copper(II) from aqueous solutions
by Spirogyra species. J Colloid Interface Sci 296:59–63
Han X, Wong YS, Wong MH, Tam NFY (2007) Biosorption and bioreduction of Cr(VI) by a mi-
croalgal isolate, Chlorella miniata. J Hazard Mater 146:65–72
Kaewsarn P, Yu Q (2001) Cadmium (II) removal from aqueous solutions by pre-treated of marine
alga Padina sp. Environ Pollut 112:209–213
Lembi CA, Waaland JR (1988) Algae and human affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lesmana SO, Febriana N, Soetaredjo FE, Sunarso J, Ismadji S (2009) Studies on potential ap-
plications of biomass for the separation of heavy metals from water ad wastewater. Biochem
Eng J 44:19–41
Lio Y, Cao Q, Luo F, Chen J (2009) Biosorption of Cd2+, Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ ions from aqueous
solutions by pretreated biomass of brown algae. J Hazard Mater 163:931–938
Luo F, Liu Y, Li X, Xuan Z, Ma J (2006) Biosorption of lead ion by chemically-modified biomass
of marine brown algae Laminaria japonica. Chemosphere 64:1122–1127
Martins BL, Cruz CCV, Luna AS (2006) Sorption and desorption of Pb2+ ions by deal Sargassum
sp biomass. Biochem Eng 27:310–314
Mehta SK, Gaur JP (2001) Characterization and optimization of Ni and Cu sorption from aqueous
solution by Chlorella vulgaris. Ecol Eng 18:1–13
Mehta SK, Gaur JP (2005) Use of algae for removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: Progress
and prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol 25:113–152
Naddafi K, Saeedi R (2009) Biosorption of copper(II) from aqueous solutions by brown macroalga
Cistoseira myrica. Environ Eng Sci 26:1009–1015
Ngah WSW, Hanafiah MAKM (2008) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by chemi-
cally modified plant wastes as adsorbents: A review. Biores Technol 99:3935–3948
Nilanjana D, Vimala R, Kartjika P (2008) Biosorption of heavy metals - An overview. Chemical
Biomed Eng 7:159–169
Ozdemir S, Kilinc E, Poli A, Nicolaus B, Guven K (2009) Biosorption of Cd, Cu, Ni, Man and
Zn from aqueous solutions by thermophilic bacteria Ceobacillus toebii subsp. decanicus and
Geobacillus thermoleovorans subsp. stromboliensis: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic
studies. Chem Eng J 152:195–206
Pan JH, Liu RX, Tang HX (2007) Surface reaction of Bacillus cereus biomass and its biosorption
for deal and copper ions. J Environ Sci China 19:403–408
Pasavant P, Apiratikul R, Sungkhum V, Suthiparinyanont P, Wattanachira S, Marhaba TF (2006)
Biosorption of Cu2+, Cd2+, Pb2+ and Zn2+ using dried marine green macroalga Caulerpa lentil-
lifera. Biores Technol 97:2321–2329
Rao PS, Kalyani S, Reddy KVNS, Krishnaiah A (2005) Comparison of nickel(II), and copper(II)
ions from aqueous solution by Sphaeroplea algae and acid treated Sphaeroplea algae. Sci Tech-
nol 40:3149–3165
Raven PH, Evert FE, Eichorn SE (1999) Biology of plants, 6th edn. W.H. Freeman and Company,
New York
Rincon J, Gonzalez F, Ballester A, Blázquez ML, Muñoz JA (2005) Biosorption of heavy met-
als by chemically activated algae Fucus vesiculosus. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 80:
1403–1407
Romera E, González F, Ballester A, Blázquez ML, Muñoz JA (2006) Biosorption with algae: A
statistical review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 26:223–235
Romera E, González F, Ballester A, Blázquez ML, Muñoz JA (2007) Comparative study of bio-
sorption of heavy metals using diffierent types of algae. Biores Technol 98:3344–3353
Romera E, González F, Ballester A, Blázquez ML, Muñoz JA (2008a). Biosorption of heavy met-
als by Fucus spiralis. Biores Technol 99:4684–4693
Romera E, González F, Ballester A, Blázquez ML, Muñoz JA (2008b) Biosorption of Cd, Ni and
Zn with mixtures of different types of algae. Environ Eng Sci 25:999–1007
Southichak B, Nakano K, Nomura M, Chiba N, Nishimura O (2008) Marine macroalgae Sargas-
sum horneiri as biosorbent for heavy metal removal: roles of calcium in ion exchange mecha-
nism. Water Sci Technol 58:697–704
178 F. González et al.

Southichak B, Nakano K, Nomura M, Chiba N, Nishimura O (2009) Differences in adsorption

mechanisms of heavy metal by two different plant biomasses: reed and brown seaweed. Water
Sci Technol 59:339–346
Talaro KP, Talaro A (2002) Foundations in microbiology, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Collegue, Black-
lick
Tuzun I, Bayramoglu G, Yalcin E, Basaran G, Celik G, Arica MY (2005) Equilibrium and kinetic
studies on biosorption of Hg(II), Cd(II), and Pb(II) ions onto microalgae Chlamydomonas re-
inhardtii. J Environ Manag 77:85–92
Vilar VJP, Botelho CMS, Boaventura RAR (2007) Modeling equilibrium and kinetics of metal up-
take by algal biomass in continuous stirred and packed bed adsorbers. Adsorption 13:587–601
Vilar VJP, Botelho CMS, Boaventura RAR (2008) Effect of Cu(II), Cd(II) and Zn(II) on Pb(II)
biosorption by algae Gelidium-derived materials. J Hazard Mater 154:711–720
Vijayaraghavan K, Padmesh VN, Palanivelu K, Velan M (2006) Biosorption of nickel(II) ions
onto Sargassum wightii: application of two-parameter and three-parameter isotherm models. J
Hazrd Mater B 133:304–308
Volesky B (2007) Biosorption and me. Water Res 41:4017–4029
Wang J, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnology
Adv 27:195–226
Yinghui L, Cao Q, Luo F, Chen J (2009) Biosorption of Cd2+, Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ ions from aque-
ous solutions by pretreated biomass of brown algae. J Hazard Mater 163:931–938
Zhang X, Luo S, Yang Q, Zhang H, Li J (1997) Accumulation of uranium at low concentration by
green alga Scenedesmus obliquus. J Phycol 9:65–71