Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233004629
Decolorization of Wastewater
CITATIONS READS
487 1,333
3 authors:
Pen-Chi Chiang
National Taiwan University
229 PUBLICATIONS 4,396 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Basic mechanisms evolved by plants to counter heavy metal stress View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Hyunook Kim on 07 September 2015.
Decolorization of Wastewater
a a a
Oliver J. Hao , Hyunook Kim & Pen-Chi Chiang
a
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park,
MD 20742, U.S.A.
Published online: 03 Jun 2010.
To cite this article: Oliver J. Hao , Hyunook Kim & Pen-Chi Chiang (2000) Decolorization of Wastewater, Critical Reviews in
Environmental Science and Technology, 30:4, 449-505, DOI: 10.1080/10643380091184237
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and
should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for
any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of
the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 30(4):449–505 (2000)
Decolorization of Wastewater
Oliver J. Hao,* Hyunook Kim, and Pen-Chi Chiang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College
Park, MD 20742, U.S.A.
ABSTRACT: The public demand for color-free waste discharge to receiving waters and tougher
color standards have made decolorization of a variety of industrial wastes a top priority. Unfortu-
nately, with the complicated color-causing compounds, the decolorization of these wastes is a
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
difficult and challenging task. This article first describes the background information of dye mol-
ecules and dye waste characteristics. The methods for color measurements and standards are then
discussed. Different techniques including almost all the known physical, chemical and biological
techniques are described for decolorization. Each process alone may not be able to meet the
requirements. A combination of these processes, for example, chemical-biological, biological-chemi-
cal, chemical-physical, chemical-chemical, etc. is often used. The formation of intermediates during
the decolorization process is emphasized. These byproducts may be more toxic than the parent
compounds. Thus, the extent of the mineralization in waste decolorization should be evaluated.
I. INTRODUCTION
1064-3389/00/$.50
© 2000 by CRC Press LLC
449
light absorbance in the wavelength range of 350 to 500 nm.8 A trace concentration
of these dyes as low as 0.1 mg/L will yield a color index of A465 (absorbance at 465
nm) = 50.9 Based on the EPA’s toxics release inventory, approximately 2200 kg
of four hazardous dyes were discharged annually into the publicly owned treatment
works.10
The dyes and colors present in wastewaters, along with other residual chemical
reagents used for processing, and impurities from the raw materials and other
hazardous materials in the finishing process, including polyvinyl alcohol, starches,
surfactants, pesticides, and biocides in textile industries,11 have presented signifi-
cant problems for wastewater treatment. In addition to high organic content, the
textile wastewaters exhibits low BOD/COD ratios (< 0.1) due to the difficult-
biodegradable nature of the dyes.12 The final effluent from textile wastewater
treatment plants always exhibits a certain degree of color intensity. The discharge
of colored waste to receiving waters is aesthetically displeasing, to say the least.
Although not all dyes are toxic compounds, some can produce hazardous aromatic
amines. The public demand of color-free effluent as well as strict regulatory
requirements render the color elimination in wastewater treatment extremely dif-
ficult and costly.
The main objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the
technologies used for decolorization in the wastewater treatment field in general
and in the textile industry in particular. Refer to a review paper by Bajpai and
Bajpai2 for color removal in pulp and paper mill wastewaters.
II. DYES
A. Background
450
130341.pgs
451
451
FIGURE 1. A typical flow diagram for a textile cotton knit plant (Ref. 7).
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
in particular is presented. The material is mostly compiled from the Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia13 and Color Handbook.14
The classes of dyes frequently used in textile/tannery industries include acid,
basic, direct, disperse, mordant, reactive, sulfur, azoic, and vat dyes. Acid dyes are
water-soluble anionic dyes with different chromophore (color-bearing) groups
substituted with acidic functional groups such as nitro-, carboxyl-, and sulfonic
acid. By adding a sulfonic group, the water-insoluble dye becomes soluble. Basic
dyes are cationic types with chromophores typically having amino groups. Direct
dyes are highly water-soluble salts of sulfonic acid of azo dyes. Reactive dyes,
similar to direct dyes, are also highly water-soluble anionic dyes, but have excel-
lent wet fastness with binding to the textile fibers via covalent bonds. Disperse
dyes are substantially water-insoluble nonionic dyes for the application to the
hydrophobic fibers from aqueous dispersion. The charge and hydrophobicity char-
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
acteristics of these polycyclic dyes and the solution pH may explain the environ-
mental fate of these dyes in dyeing processes and subsequent treatment processes.
Table 1 illustrates the complicated structure of some commercial dyes. The con-
sumption of different dyes for a particular dyehouse is shown in Table 2, and the
typical compositions of different classes of dyes are tabulated in Table 3.
Among 12 different chromophores, azo (phenylazobenzene) and anthraquinone
are the major units. Azo dyes, characterized by nitrogen to nitrogen double bonds
(-N=, Figure 2a), account for up to 70% of all textile dyestuffs produced, and are
the most common chromophore of the reactive dyes.16 The color of a dye and its
intensity can be modified by introducing auxochromes into the molecule of these
azo dyes (Table 4). Refer to the Danish report17 about environmental and health
assessment of azo dyes, which includes the list of dyestuffs whose use in the textile
in Denmark is forbidden because of the potential formation of aromatic amines.
Another important chromophore group is the anthraquinone series (Figure 2b),
which is the basis of many disperse and vat dyes (Table 1). The electron donor or
electron withdrawal groups as well as the type of substituent groups (e.g., carboxyl
or sulfonic) significantly affect the degree of dye removal by different treatment
techniques used.
The Color Index (CI) number, developed by the Society of Dyers and Colourists,
is used for dye classification. Once the chemical structure of a dye is known, a five-
digit CI number is assigned to it. The first word is the dye classification and the
second word is the hue or shade of the dye. For example, CI Acid Yellow 36 (CI
13065) shown in Table 1 is a yellow dye of the acid type. Additionally, a dye
mixture may consist of several dyes, for example, Navy 106 is composed of three
reactive azo dyes: (1) Remazol Black B (Reactive Black 5), (2) Remazol Red RB
(Reactive Red 198), and (3) Remazol Golden Yellow 3.18
Metal-complex dyes exhibit superior light- and wash-fastness because of the
presence of transition metals, such as chromium in azomethine,19 copper in phthalo-
cyanine (Reactive Blue 21), and in Direct Blue 80,20 nickel in bis(dithiobenzil)nickels21
or cobalt, that modify the surface chemistry between the dye molecule and fabric.22
452
453
130341.pgs
TABLE 1 (continued)
454
454
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
TABLE 2
Dye Consumption for a Particular Dyehouse with a Flow of 500,000 gpd
(Ref. 15)
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
TABLE 3
Dye Concentrations of Different Classes in Wastewaters (Ref. 11)
455
TABLE 4
Color of Some Azo-Compounds
456
In the dyeing process, there are significant amounts of unused dyes left in
wastewater. This is especially true for reactive dyes because the hydrolyzed form
has no affinity for textile substrates. Under alkaline conditions, reactive dyes form
a reactive vinyl sulfone (-SO2-CH=CH2) group, which bonds fabrics (Figure 3).
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
457
by the light absorption in a wide UV-VIS spectrum range from 250 to 600 nm.8
Furthermore, the intensity of the color varies with pH.30 The waste pH also varies;
pH as low as 2 or as high as 12 is not uncommon.31 The organic concentration in
dye wastewater is very high. As COD measurements cannot detect some aromatic
hydrocarbons, including many dye molecules, a reduction of COD does not reveal
the extent of dye removal. Thus, a high degree of color reduction in absorbance
may not be accompanied by the corresponding reduction in COD after electro-
chemical treatment32 or ozonation.24,28 Based on the complicated structure of these
dyes, the BOD/COD ratio is low, indicating the nonbiodegradable nature of these
dyes. For example, BOD30/COD ratios of eight dyes range from 1 to 25% with an
average of 10%; little color change after 30 days incubation.33 Also, a significantly
high temperature (50oC) of dyeing bath waste may present a unique advantage or
disadvantage for some treatment processes.
The toxicity of some dyes to the single cell green algae, Selenastrum
capricornutum, and fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, is shown in Table 5.
In general, cationic dyes were more toxic (e.g., LC50 for Basic Violet 1 is only 0.05
mg/L to P. promelas), anionic acid dyes the next, and direct dyes are the least toxic
(LC50 > 180 mg/L). For Ceriodaphnia dubia, lower LC50 values were reported for
Solvent Yellow 1 (4-phenylazoaniline) at 0.07 mg/L and Solvent Yellow 7 (4-
phenylazophenol) at 0.9 mg/L,36 two dyes identified from the wastewater of a dye
manufacturing plant. The toxicity of the Acid Orange 7 dye to nitrifiers is between
those highly toxic compounds (phenolic and metals) and other organic compounds
(e.g., formalin).37 The EC50 for Acid Blue 40 for activated sludge was found to be
28 mg/L.38 In a study of the toxicity of two xanthene dyes to Daphnia pulex,
Walthall and Stark39 reported the LC50,48 h values of 337 and 0.42 mg/L for
fluorescein salt and phloxine B, respectively. The presence of these two dyes
exhibits a synergistic effect. However, the rapid breakdown of phloxine B indicates
the effect on wild populations minimal.39 The activated sludge treated textile
effluent exhibits a similar toxicity toward Daphnia magna (LC50,48 h = 4 to 8%),
when compared with the raw textile waste.40 The fact that the activated sludge
458
459
adsorbed onto either primary or secondary sludge with the equilibrium time less
than 30 min, and the pH is the most important parameter affecting dye adsorption.44
Because the nature of different dyes is extremely complex with respect to their
charge, substituted groups and hydrophobicity, the extent of dye sorption depends
on the type of dyes as well as environmental conditions, for example, hardness and
sludge concentration.45 For example, direct dyes are not adsorbed on activated
sludge because of solubility in water, or biodegraded.46 Thus, direct dyes will pass
through the treatment processes and enter the receiving water environment. The
complicated structure of various dye molecules renders biodegradation difficult. In
fact, 11 out of 18 water-soluble azo dyes were unaffected by the activated sludge
process.46 According to Haug et al.,47 5 to 15% of the organic carbon content of the
Rhine river was caused by sulfonated compounds and their secondary products.
The fate of sorbed dyes on sludge is still unknown; dyes either release (desorb),
undergo biological reactions in different sludge management processes, or remain
intact.
A. General
460
organic dye molecules. More often than not, decolorization occurs when the
chromophore bond is broken, but with the major fragments of the original molecule
remaining intact. Thus, the reduction in TOC and COD may be insignificant even
for a complete decolorization of wastewaters. These intermediates in terms of
organic loadings and toxicity can present significant problems for downstream
treatment processes and receiving water bodies. The fact that the organic amines
produced under reducing conditions (chemically or biologically) exhibit more
toxic effects to the environment than the parent compound is well known.
Different processes for color removal typically include physical, chemical,
electrical, and biological schemes (Table 6). The processes listed in Table 6
include almost all the known wastewater treatment units. Some processes, such as
electrochemical techniques and ion pair extraction, are relatively new for textile
461
waste treatment, while others have been used in the industry for a long time. Each
process has its own constraints in terms of cost, feasibility, practicability, reliabil-
ity, stability, environmental impact, sludge production, operational difficulty, pre-
treatment requirements, the extent of the organic removal and potential toxic
byproducts. Also, the use of an individual process alone may not completely
decolorize the wastewater and degrade the “colored” compounds. Even when some
processes are reported for a successful decolorization of a particular wastewater,
the same process may not be applicable to other types of colored wastewater.
As would be expected, biologically anaerobic or aerobic processes alone are
ineffective for decolorization and dye removal. Carbon adsorption of dyes is only
successful in some classes of dyes (ionic type and hydrophobicity) for a given type
of carbon (carbon source, activation process, and pore size distribution) in a certain
pH range. Coagulation may not remove highly soluble dyes and it may be good for
disperse dyes, but it produces a large quantity of sludge. Some processes are
462
463
B. Color Measurements
Qualitatively, the type of the color and its intensity are easily visualized
through our eyes. Quantitatively, the concentrations of dyes can be measured by
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
464
literature and in the earlier editions (14th) of the Standard Methods at an arbitrary
wavelength of 465 nm cannot truly represent the color intensity for the complicated
dye wastes.
There is a good correlation between the transparency and the ADMI values; a
transparency of about 15 cm corresponds to approximately the ADMI color value
of 570.63 An on-line continuous measurement of ADMI color values was used by
Chang et al.63 to use ORP (oxidation reduction potential) for controlling NaOCl
oxidation of color derivatives present in a textile wastewater.
C. Color Standards
There are U.S. Federal regulations for color limits in the pretreatment of textile
waste before discharging it into public sewers, and for the textile mill final
discharge into receiving waters,64 for example, 120 (ADMI color unit) for the new
source and 220 for the best available technology for existing sources. The color
standards in different states may vary from locality to locality, presumably based
on the receiving water quality. For example, the downstream color in a receiving
river should not be greater than the upstream value by more than 50 (ADMI unit)
for an Alabama dye waste discharge permit,65 or the color should be less than 2000
(ADMI unit) for the wastewater discharge into a municipal wastewater treatment
plant in Virginia.18 In the state of Maryland, there are no numerical color standards
issued to any industrial wastes; only qualitative description of prohibiting waste
discharge with significant color is provided.66
The color standards in Germany for textile wastewater are based on the
absorbance measurements on three wavelengths at 436 nm (yellow), 525 nm (red),
and 620 nm (blue), with the respective standard (DFZ) value of 7, 5, and 3 m-1.24
These values are determined as:
465
(Lavibound method) in Singapore, and 20 Lavibound units in Hong Kong for the
waste flow rates less than 10 m3/d.
D. Process Technology
1. Physical Processes
466
130341.pgs
TABLE 9
Different Techniques used for Wastewater Decolorization
467
467
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
TABLE 9 (continued)
468
468
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
469
469
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
TABLE 9 (continued)
470
470
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
471
471
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
TABLE 9 (continued)
472
472
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
473
473
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
TABLE 9 (continued)
474
474
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
475
475
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
TABLE 9 (continued)
476
476
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
477
477
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
ing waters) and process operation (type of fiber used), a specific membrane unit
(nanofiltration, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis) can be selected.155 The classi-
fication of these membranes is due to their pore size to retain solutes with different
molecular weights cutoff (MWCO), for example, < 1000 MWCO for reverse
osmosis, 500 to 15000 for nanofiltration, and 1000 to 100000 for ultrafiltration. In
a laboratory study, Wu et al.50 used a polyamide nanofiltration membrane to
remove a variety of dyes (up to 99% color removal) and employed an ozonation
unit to decolorize the concentrate from the membrane unit. Similarly, a pilot scale
of a nanofiltration unit was successful for decolorization of two types of colored
wastes from the bleaching and dyeing industry with COD about 5400 to 14000
mg/L.69 However, different membrane techniques used in industry are mostly for
process reuse of a smaller waste flow to minimize waste generation.156 For ex-
ample, in conjunction with a new dyeing process (higher temperature rinse with a
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
reduced number of rinses), a membrane filtration of the hot rinsing water reduces
the waste more than 35 to 50% and saves energy by 70%.157 A series of membrane
units can also be used, for example, Rozzi et al.54 employed a microfiltration unit
(300 kDa) followed by a nanofiltration unit (150 Da) or a reverse osmosis mem-
brane for a potential textile waste reuse. Nonetheless, the use of the membrane
process for a large flow rate is presumably costly, in addition to the common
problems of the membrane process with respect to flux decline, irreversible foul-
ing, and treatment of concentrate.
Membrane modules can also be used as a separation unit for other treatment
systems. By adding powdered activated carbon to an activated sludge unit, the
color removal for domestic waste in the membrane unit is about 92%.158 Similarly,
a cross-flow microfiltration system was used for the separation of TiO2 in a UV/
TiO2 system that was used for polishing biologically treated dye waste.154
2. Electrochemical Processes
478
The above reduction of azo dyes also applies to biological reducing conditions.165
479
a. Coagulation
problem is a major factor in the selection of the coagulation process for waste
decolorization. To yield acceptable effluent color quality, the coagulation
process is often combined with other techniques, for example, biological
processes. Even in a combined fluidized activated sludge bed-coagulation
system, the chemical dosage still may be extremely high, or 600 mg/L alum at
the optimum pH 6.166 For Fe(II) coagulation, the addition of H2O2 (Fentons’
reagent) renders the process more effective because of simultaneous oxidation
and coagulation. For lime coagulation, a higher amount of sludge quantity is
generated than that of alum/iron coagulation, and some toxic byproducts may
be formed due to a drastic increase in pH, for example, the formation of aniline
and chloroanilines.53
b. Chlorination
480
Activated carbon (either granular or powder) is known for its excellent adsorp-
tion capacity toward a variety of aqueous and gaseous contaminants. The selection
and efficiency evaluation of a particular activated carbon for decolorization of a
given dye wastewater can be performed easily in the laboratory. The selected
carbon should decolorize the waste containing non-polar, aromatic colored com-
pounds to a successful degree. However, the use of activated carbon systems,
including regeneration of adsorbent, is too expensive. In fact, desorption of the
large dye molecules is extremely difficult43 due to strong chemical bonding be-
tween the adsorbent and the sorbed dye,87 rendering regeneration costly and
impractical. Case in point is that ion exchange regeneration of an anion exchange
resin used for removal of some acid dyes requires a three-step regeneration process
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
because of stronger ionic forces binding between the dye molecules and the resin.15
Furthermore, the use of carbon adsorption for decolorization of the raw wastewater
is impractical because of competition between colored molecules and other or-
ganic/inorganic compounds. The adsorption technique may be used as a polishing
step or as an emergency unit at the end of treatment stage to meet the discharge
color standards. Even with the polishing system, the activated carbon system still
cannot completely remove all colors and appears costly. For example, in a field
study a granular activated carbon column (20 m3) was used for decolorization of
the ozonated waste from the activated sludge process effluent.54 The color removal
efficiencies with respect to three wavelength absorbance (426, 550, and 660 nm)
range only from 36 to 51%, and the fraction of exhausted carbon in a column after
a 55-day operation is about 30 to 35%, or only 1600 m3 waste treated per m3 carbon
used.
Typically, acid dyes (anionic dye) are mostly adsorbed in a reversible process,
while basic dyes (cationic) can be removed via ion exchange process.93 The major
factor affecting adsorption process is solution pH, which affects both the degree of
dye ionization and surface charge of the activated carbon. The models and mecha-
nisms for dye adsorption onto granular or powdered carbon and other adsorbents
have been studied extensively.86,167-170 Essentially, the external mass transfer coef-
ficient and the solid diffusivity (intraparticle diffusion) play important roles in dye
adsorption.169 The breakthrough curves can be predicted with a model, including
volumetric mass transfer coefficients in the fluid and adsorbent phases as well as
some fluid properties, such as the degree of axial dispersion.168
There has been considerable interest in using low-cost materials for decolori-
zation of wastewaters. These materials include: peat, slag, fly ash, and bentonite;92
palm-fruit bunch particles;101,102 bagasse pith;88-90 silica;84-86 activated alumina and
diatomite;171 teal wood balk, rice husk, hair, and coal;87 sawdust, straw, sugar beet
pulp, seaweed and bone chart;93 soil;94 maize stalks and sand;95,98 red mud;100
chitosan fiber;103,104,168 mushroom;96 eucalyptus balk;99 and sulfonated coal.172 Al-
though these studies of using low-cost materials certainly enhance our understand-
481
treatment of dye waste: (1) dye solute adsorption on carbon and biomass and (2)
subsequent biodegradation.173 In the evaluation of textile waste reuse, granular-
activated carbon was also added into an anaerobic reactor to enhance pretreatment
capacity for subsequent activated sludge system.174
Recently, many AOPs, such as the Fenton’s reagent [H2O2 and Fe(II)], UV
light with or without catalysis (e.g., TiO2), H2O2, and O3, have been evaluated for
decolorization of wastewaters. The AOP processes are essentially based on the
generation of highly reactive radical species, specifically the hydroxyl radical
(•OH) to react with dye molecules. The oxidation potential of •OH is higher than
other oxidizing agents (Table 11). The use of H2O2 alone is often not effective; it
even does not react with a particular azo dye at a wide pH range of 3 to 9.49 For
light-mediated oxidation of dye molecules, UV in different wavelengths and
visible light can be used. As would be expected, UV alone may not be applicable
to wastewaters with a higher intensity of color (Table 9).
TABLE 11
Oxidation Potential for Several Oxidizing Agents (Ref. 11)
482
The combination of ferrous and H2O2 serves two functions: oxidation of dye
molecules by the hydroxyl radical and coagulation by iron ions. The chemical
dosage largely depends on the waste strength and the solution pH. The H2O2
dosage as high as 80,000 mg/L has been used for Fenton oxidation of a pigment
waste with Fe2+/H2O2 ratio of 0.05.176 The H2O2 (20 to 100 mg/L) addition to a
Fe(II) sulfate (60 mg/L) flocculation stage with an organic flocculant enhanced
decolorization for 12 reactive dyes.177 Kang and Chang70 also report the enhanced
removals of color and COD with the Fenton’s reagent or with H2O2 preoxidation
followed by ferrous coagulation, when compared with the conventional ferrous
coagulation. With the formation of Fe(III) and its complexes, the Fenton process
is able to precipitate the dissolved solutes.48,133,135 The coagulation immediately
following the Fenton oxidation would shorten floc settling time, further reduce
COD and color, and decrease effluent iron concentration.133 Unfortunately, a large
quantity of sludge generated presents disposal problems. Additionally, the pH of
the wastewater needs to be acidified for effective utilization of Fenton’s reagent
TABLE 12
Proposed Mechanisms for Photocatalytical Oxidation (Ref. 149)
483
484
TABLE 14
Possible Ozonation Mechanism (Ref. 11)
485
4. Biological Processes
486
487
of the naphthol ring is required, (2) charged groups in proximity to the azo group
hinder the reaction, (3) a second polar substituent on the dye molecules impedes
the reaction, and (4) electron-withdrawing groups on the phenyl ring accelerates
the reaction. The cell-free extract from Pseudomonas stutzeri was used for degra-
dation of several azo dyes.189 It was reported that dye redox potential and hydro-
phobic parameter are important for dye degradation. It is noted that an unidentified
bacterial species can use Acid Orange 7114 and Pseudomonas sp. use carboxyl-
Orange II182 as a sole carbon, energy, and nitrogen source for growth.
The total degradation of a certain sulfonated dye could be achieved by using
an alternating anaerobic-aerobic treatment.47 Under anaerobic conditions, the dye
(Mordant Yellow 3) was reduced by the biomass of a bacterial consortium grown
aerobically with 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulfonic acid. Stoichiometric amounts of
6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulfonate and 5-aminosalicylate were generated. These
amines then were mineralized in the subsequent aeration phase by different mem-
bers of the bacterial culture.
Knapp et al.194 isolated seven fungi to decolorize different dyes. All these
isolates decolorized some dyes and all dyes were decolorized to some extent. They
reported that P. chrysosporium was among the least effective of the seven isolates.
The extracellular lignin peroxidases excreted by P. chrysosporium have received
considerable attention for decolorizing wastewater.125,127,131,132,195 The efficiency of
enzymatic decolorization is lower when compared with the whole culture, for
example, P. chrysosporium are able to mineralize five azo dyes and sulfanilic
acids,110 whereas crude enzymes from this fungi are only able to partially remove
several azo dyes at pH 4.127 The solution pH is important, for example, lignin
peroxidases can decolorize the Congo Red at pH 2.5,128 but not at pH 4.5.125 The
seeming contradiction of these pHs for dye decolorization between enzymatic
(e.g., pH 2.5 to 4.5) and cultural conditions (pH 5 to 7) awaits further investigation.
After conducting decolorization of 24 dyes with the lignin peroxidase en-
zyme, Podgornik et al.131 conclude that the enzyme is highly unspecific to dyes
with decolorization rates spanning over two orders of magnitude range. Hence, the
488
pellets and the second slow phase is due to biodegradation. The adsorption capacity
of 105 mg/g mycelium of T. versicolor is comparable to other adsorbents. The
adsorption of the dyes to actinomycetes has also been reported for industrial
effluent containing different reactive dyes.108 The initial rapid sorption of dyes and
subsequent biodegradation were also reported for bacterial cells.19
An interesting phenomenon has been reported in the literature in that color
intensity sometimes increases after biological processes with a preceding pretreat-
ment process.5,196 The changing pH values between lime-treated effluent and mixed
liquor may in fact increase color intensity. For example, the indicator phenolphtha-
lein that is widely used in a variety of titration tests changes from colorless to pink
in the pH range 8.2 to 8.4. In addition to pH effect, the organic dye molecules may
be modified by biomass to such an extent that they produce other “colored”
chromophores. Also, the partially broken amines may self-polymize to form col-
ored and biological recalcitrant compounds.114 Finally, the reactor content in
biological treatment systems may further interfere with absorbance readings, thus
misrepresenting the actual color intensity.
5. Others
Recently, Vinodgopal et al.141 have demonstrated that the use of the ultrasonic
approach for mineralization of dyes is feasible. The Reactive Black 5 dye was
decolorized in an oxygen-saturated solution after 6-h sonification (640 kHz fre-
quency with an output power of 240 W) with about 65% dye being mineralized.
The byproducts identified included only sulfate, nitrate, and simple organic ox-
alate; the accumulation of oxalate is responsible for the observed low pH (3.1).
Because this decolorization process only employs O2 for induction of the hydroxyl
radical, its simplicity and less toxic byproducts may warrant further investigation.
Another potential viable alternate is the wet air oxidation.142,143,197 Under high
temperature and pressure, complex organics, including dye molecules, can be
489
E. Intermediate Formation
490
130341.pgs
TABLE 16
Intermediates Produced during Declorization of Different Techniques
491
491
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
TABLE 16 (continued)
492
492
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
493
493
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
130341.pgs
TABLE 16 (continued)
494
494
10/13/00, 1:15 PM
IV. SUMMARY
The public demand for color-free waste discharge to receiving waters and
tougher color standards have made decolorization of a variety of industrial wastes
a top priority. Unfortunately, with the complicated dye structure described in this
article, the decolorization as well as organic removal of these wastes is a difficult
and challenging task. Almost all the known physical, chemical, and biological
techniques have been used for decolorization, yet each process alone is unable to
meet the requirements. Different AOPs have received considerable attention in
textile/dye waste treatment. Like activated carbon, they are not a panacea for all
types of the dye wastes. A combination of these processes, for example, chemical-
biological, biological-chemical, chemical-physical, chemical-chemical, etc., is of-
ten used.
Downloaded by [Yonsei University] at 16:15 23 February 2015
Some studies have reported successful decolorization results after using these
different treatment schemes, despite the fact that the treated waste still contains a
slight degree of color. Only a few cases in the literature indicate complete decol-
orization and mineralization. This leads to the logic question of just how significant
a slight degree of color in receiving waters is, and is its impact enough to warrant
a color-free waste discharge? The need for research in this area is urgent. The fate
of dyes in environment, particularly in wastewater treatment plants, also deserves
considerable study. Case in point is that of the fate of sorbed dyes in sludge and
other adsorbents. Are these sorbed dyes easily desorbed?
In compliance with the recent regulations, for example, European Council
Directive 96/6I/EC200 and Pollution Prevention Act in the U.S., the end-of-pipe
treatment is only a part of the solutions needed to combat the difficult-to-treat dye
wastewaters. The in-house prevention to multimedia pollution is a necessity. The
recent advances of “Cleaner Technology” may assist the dye waste minimization.
For example, Provost201 outlined some approaches for source chemical reduction
in textile printing industries and Hickman177 discussed some developments in
“clean” textile technologies. Refer to further information for cleaner production in
a case study in an Australian dyeing company,202 and United Nations Environment
Programme textiles working group on Cleaner Production.203
Finally, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is encour-
aged for the development of standard color measurements that will be used
worldwide. Many different methods used in the literature render comparison of
technology and performance evaluation impossible. Color is a color regardless of
its source.
REFERENCES
1. Hao, O. J., Phull, K. K., and Chen, J. M. Wet oxidation of TNT red water and bacterial
toxicity of treated water. Wat. Res., 28(2), 283–290, 1994.
495
Carey, and G. J. van der Kraak, Eds., pp. 53–68, St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996.
7. Babuna, F. G., Orhon, D., Cokgor, E. U., Insel, G., and Yaprakli, B. Modeling of activated
sludge for textile wastewaters. Wat. Sci. Technol., 38(4/5), 9–17, 1998.
8. Matsui, M., Kobayashi, K., Shibata, K., and Takase, Y. Ozonation of dyes. II. Ozone
treatment of 4–phenylazo-1–naphthol. J. Soc. Dyers Colourists, 97(5), 210–213, 1981.
9. Little, L. W., Lamb, J. C., Chillingworth, M. A., and Durkin, W. B. Acute toxicity of
selected commercial dyes to the fathead minnow and evaluation of biological treatment for
reduction of toxicity. Proc. 29th Ind. Waste Conf., pp 524–534, Purdue University, Lafayette,
IN, 1974.
10. EPA. 1993 Toxics Release Inventory, Public Data Release. Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 1995.
11. Uygur, A. An overview of oxidative and photooxidative decolorisation treatments of textile
waste waters. J. Soc. Dyers Colourists, 113(7/8), 211–217, 1997.
12. Pagga, U. and Brown, D. The degradation of dyestuffs. - II. Behavior of dyestuffs in aerobic
biodegradation tests. Chemosphere, 15(4), 479–491, 1986.
13. ECT. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed., John Wiley, New York,
NY, 1977.
14. Ingamells, W. Colour for Textiles, A Users’ Handbook, Society of Dyers and Colourists, West
Yorkshire, England, 1993.
15. Rock, S. L. and Stevens, B. W. Polymeric adsorption-ion exchange process for decolorizing
dye waste streams. Textile Chemist Colorist, 7(9), 169–171, 1975.
16. Carliell, C. M., Barclay, S. J., Naidoo, N., Buckley, C. A., Mulholland, D. A., and Senior,
E. Microbial decolorization of a reactive azo dye under anaerobic conditions. Water SA, 21(1),
61–69, 1995.
17. DEPA. Azocolorants in textiles and toys, Danish Environmental Protection Agency, No.
4161998, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1998 (http://www.mst.dk/199812publikat/87-7909-136-9/
indhold_eng.htm).
18. Ganesh, R., Boardman, G. D., and Michelsen, D. Fate of azo dyes in sludges. Wat. Res.,
28(6), 1367–1376, 1994.
19. Matanic, H., Grabaric, Z., Briski, F., and Koprivanac, N. Microbial decolorization of
chromium-azomethine dye under aerobic conditions. J. Soc. Dyers Colourists, 112(5/6), 158–
161, 1996.
20. Adams, C. D., Fusco, W., and Kanzelmeyer, T. Ozone, hydrogen peroxide/ozone and UV/
ozone treatment of chromium— and copper-complex dyes — decolorization and metal re-
lease. Ozone Sci. Eng., 17(2), 149–162, 1995.
496
28. Tzitzi, M., Vayenas, D. V., and Lyberatos, G. Pretreatment of textile industrial wastewaters
with ozone. Wat. Sci. Technol., 29(9), 151–160, 1994.
29. Lin, S. H. and Peng, C. F. Treatment of textile wastewater by electrochemical method. Wat.
Res., 28(2), 277–282, 1994.
30. Zhang, F-M, Knapp, J. S., and Tapley, K. N. Decolourisation of cotton bleaching effluent
with wood rotting fungus. Wat. Res., 33(4), 919–928, 1999.
31. Cooper, S. G. The Textile Industry, Environmental Control and Energy Conservation. Noyes
Data Co., Park Ridge, NJ, 1978.
32. Naumczyk, J., Szpyrkowicz, L., and Zilio-Grandi, F. Electrochemical treatment of textile
wastewater. Wat. Sci. Technol., 34(11), 17–24, 1996.
33. Porter, J. J. and Snider, E. H. Long-term biodegradability of textile chemicals. J. Wat.
Pollut. Control Fed., 48(9), 2198–2210, 1976.
34. ADMI. Dyes and the Environment, American Dye Manufacturers Institute, Inc., Reports on
Selected Dyes and Their Effects, Vol. 2, 1974.
35. EPA. Assessment of Potential Toxic Release from Leather Industry Dyeing Operations.
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincin-
nati, OH, 1978.
36. DiGiano, F. A., Clarkin, C., Charles, M. J., Maerker, M. J., Francisco, D. E., and
LaRocca, C. Testing of the EPA toxicity identification evaluation protocol in the textile dye
manufacturing industry. Wat. Sci. Technol., 25(3), 55–63, 1992.
37. He, Y. and Bishop, P. L. Effect of acid orange 7 on nitrification process. J. Environ. Eng.,
ASCE, 120(1), 108–121, 1994.
38. Ledakowicz, S. and Gonera, M. Optimisation of oxidant dose for combined chemical and
biological treatment of textile wastewater. Wat. Res., 33(11), 2511–2516, 1999.
39. Walthall, W. K. and Stark, J. D. The acute and chronic toxicity of two xanthene dyes,
fluorescein sodium salt and phloxine B to Daphnia pulex. Environ. Pollut., 104(2), 207–215,
1999.
40. Moran, C., Hall, M. E., and Howell, R. Effects of sewage treatment on textile effluent. J. Soc.
Dyers Colourists, 113(10), 272–274, 1997.
41. Hao, O. J., Shin, C-J., Lin, C-F., Jeng, F-T., and Chen, Z-C. Use of Microtox tests for
screening industrial wastewater toxicity. Wat. Sci. Technol., 34(10), 43–50, 1996.
42. Porter, J. J. Stability of vat, disperse and sulfur dyes to light and water. Textile Chemist
Colorist, 7(7), 130–135, 1975.
43. Cooper, P. Removing colour from dyehouse waste waters — a critical review of techniques
available. J. Soc. Dyers Colourists, 109(3), 97–100, 1993.
497
processes for treatment of reactive-dye wastewater. J. Environ. Eng., ASCE, 124(3), 272–277,
1998.
51. Lin, S. H. and Lin, C. M. Treatment of textile waste effluent by ozonation and chemical
coagulation. Wat. Res., 27(12), 1743–1748, 1993.
52. Li, X. Z. and Zhao, Y. G. On-site treatment of dyeing wastewater by a bio-photoreactor
system. Wat. Sci. Technol., 36(2/3), 165–172, 1997.
53. Sarasa, J., Roche, M. P., Ormad. M. P., Gimeno, H., Puig, A., and Ovelleiro, J. L.
Treatment of a wastewater resulting from dyes manufacturing with ozone and chemical
coagulation. Wat. Res., 32(9), 2721–2727, 1998.
54. Rozzi, A., Malpei, F., Bonomo, L., and Bianchi, R. Textile wastewater reuse in Northern
Italy (COMO). Wat. Sci. Technol., 39(5), 122–128, 1999.
55. Krull, R., Hemmi, P., Otto, P., and Hempel, D. C. Combined biological and chemical
treatment of highly concentrated residual dyehouse liquors. Wat. Sci. Technol., 38(4/5), 339–
346, 1998.
56. Ince, N. H. Critical effect of hydrogen peroxide in photochemical dye degradation. Wat. Res.,
33(4), 1080–1084, 1999.
57. Chang, C-N., Lin, J-G., Chao, A. C., and Liu, C-S. Modified Nernst model for on-line
control of the chemical oxidation decoloring process. Wat. Sci. Technol., 34(3/4), 151–157,
1996.
58. Hansa, A., Pillay, V. L., and Buckley, C. A. Analysis of reactive dyes using high perfor-
mance capillary electrophoresis. Wat. Sci. Technol., 39(10/11), 169–172, 1999.
59. Camp, S. R. and Sturrock, P. E. The identification of the derivatives of C.I. Reactive Blue
19 in textile wastewater. Wat. Res., 24(10), 1275–1278, 1990.
60. Fogg, A. G., Rahim, A., Yusoff, H. M., and Ahmad, R. Cathodic stripping voltammetry of
copper-complexed reactive dyes at a hanging mercury drop electrodes: Reactive Violet 5.
Talanta, 44(1), 125–129, 1997.
61. APHA. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th Ed., Am. Public
Health Assoc., Washington, DC, 1995.
62. Allen, W., Prescott, W. B., Derby, R. E., Garland, C. E., Peret, J. M., and Saltzman, M.
Determination of color of water and wastewater by means of ADMI color values. Proc. 28th
Ind. Waste Conf., pp 661–675, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN, 1973.
63. Chang, C-N,, Yu, R-F., Chao, A. C., and Tojo, S. On-line monitoring and control of the
textile wastewater color removal process. Wat. Sci. Technol., 30(3), 265–274, 1994.
64. EPA. Textile Mill Point Source Category Effluent Limitation Guidelines, Pretreatment Stan-
dards and New Source Performance Standards, 61/204/62–241, US Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 1979.
498
499
96. Mittal, A. K. and Gupta, S. K. Biosorption of cationic dyes by dead Macro fungus Fomitopsis
carnea: batch studies. Wat. Sci. Technol., 34(10), 81–87, 1996.
97. Hu, T. L. Degradation of azo dye RP2B by Pseudomonas luteola. Wat. Sci. Technol., 38(4/
5), 299–306, 1998.
98. Meyer, V., Carlsson, F. H. H., and Oellermann, R. A. Decolourization of textile effluent
using a low cost natural adsorbent material. Wat. Sci. Technol., 26(5/6), 1205–1211, 1992.
99. Morais, L. C., Freitas, O. M., Goncalves, E. P., Vasconcelos, L. T., and Gonzalez Beca,
C. G. Reactive dyes removed from wastewaters by adsorption on eucalyptus bark: variables
that define the process. Wat. Res., 33(4), 979–988, 1999.
100. Namasivayam, C. and Arasi, D. J. S. E. Removal of Congo Red from wastewater by
adsorption onto waste red mud. Chemosphere, 34(2), 401–417, 1997.
101. Nassar, M. M., Hamoda, M. F., and Radwan, G. H. Adsorption equilibria of basic dyestuff
onto palm-fruit bunch particles. Wat. Sci. Technol., 32(11), 27–32, 1995.
102. Nassar, M. M. and Magdy, Y. H. Removal of different basic dyes from aqueous by
adsorption on palm-fruit bunch particles. Chem. Eng. J., 66(3), 223–226, 1997.
103. Yoshida, H., Fukuda, S., Okamoto, A., and Kataoka, T. Recovery of direct dye and acid
dye by adsorption on chitosan fiber — equilibria. Wat. Sci. Technol., 23(7/9), 1667–1676,
1991.
104. Safarik, I. Removal of organic polycyclic compounds from water solutions with a magnetic
chitosan based sorbent bearing copper phthalocyanine dye. Wat. Res., 29(1), 101–105, 1995.
105. Lambert, S. D., Graham, N. J. D., Sollars, C. J., and Fowler, C. D. Evaluation of inorganic
absorbents for the removal of problematic textile dyes and pesticides. Wat. Sci. Technol., 36(2/
3), 173–180, 1997.
106. Seshadri, S., Bishop, P. L., and Agha, A. M. Anaerobic/aerobic treatment of selected azo
dyes in wastewater. Waste Management, 14(2), 127–137, 1994.
107. Yatome. C., Ogawa, T., Koga, D., and Idaka, E. Biodegradability of azo dyes and
triphenylmethene dyes by Pseudomonas pseudomallei 13NA. J. Soc. Dyers Colourists, 97(5),
166–169, 1981.
108. Zhou, W. and Zimmermann, W. Decolorization of industrial effluents containing reactive
dyes by actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 107(2/3), 157–162, 1993.
109. Pasti-Grigsby, M. B., Paszczynski, A., Goszczynski, S., Crawford, D. L., and Crawford,
R. L. Influence of aromatic-substitution patterns on azo dyes degradability by Streptomyces
spp. and Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58(11), 3605–3613, 1992.
110. Paszczynski, A., Pasti-Grigsby, M. B., Goszczynski, S., Crawford, R. L., and Crawford,
D. L. Mineralization of sulfonated azo dyes by Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Streptomy-
ces chromofuscus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58(11), 3598–3604, 1992.
500
501
502
wastewater treatment using Ti/Pt and Ti/Pt/Ir electrodes. Wat. Res., 29(2), 517–524, 1995.
161. McClung, S. and Lemley, A. T. Electrochemical treatment and HPLC analysis of wastewater
containing acid dyes. Textile Chemist Colorist, 26(8), 17–22, 1994.
162. Wilcock, A. Spectrophotometric analysis of electrochemically treated simulated dispersed
dyebath effluent. Textile Chemist Colorist, 24(11), 29–37, 1992.
163. Hemphill, L. and Rogers, R. Electrochemical degradation of domestic wastewater. Proc. 28th
Ind. Waste Conf., pp 214–223, West Lafayette, Purdue University, 1973.
164. Rajeshwar, K. and Ibanez, J. Environmental Electrochemistry, Fundamentals and Applica-
tions in Pollution Abatement. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1997.
165. Wuhrmann, K., Mechsner, K., and Kappeler, T. Investigation on rate-determining factors
on the microbial reduction of azo dyes. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 9(4), 325–338,
1980.
166. Park, Y-K. and Lee, C-H. Dyeing wastewater treatment by activated sludge process with a
polyurethane fluidized bed biofilm. Wat. Sci. Technol., 34(5/6), 193–200, 1996
167. Yeh, R. Y. L. and Thomas, A. Color removal from the wastewaters by adsorption using
powdered activated carbon-mass transfer studies. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 63(1), 48–54,
1995.
168. Yoshida, H. and Takemori, T. Adsorption of direct dye on cross-linked chitosan fiber:
breakthrough curve. Wat. Sci. Technol., 35(7), 29–38, 1997.
169. Walker, G. M. and Weatherley, L. R. Adsorption of acid dyes onto granular activated carbon
in fixed beds. Wat. Res., 31(8), 2093–2101, 1997.
170. Walker, G. M. and Weatherley, L. R. Kinetics of acid dye adsorption on GAC. Wat. Res.,
33(8), 1895–1899, 1999.
171. Yeh, R. Y. L. and Thomas, A. Color difference measurement and color removal from dye
wastewaters using different adsorbents. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 63(1), 55–59, 1995.
172. Mittal, A. K. and Venkobachar, C. Sorption and desorption of dyes by sulfonated coal. J.
Environ. Eng., ASCE, 119(2), 366–368, 1993
173. Costa, C. and Marquez, M. C. Kinetics of the PACT process. Wat. Res., 32(1), 107–114,
1998.
174. Terras, C., Vandevivere, P., and Verstraete, W. Optimal treatment and rational reuse of
water in textile industry. Wat. Sci. Technol., 39(5), 81–88, 1999.
175. Chu, W. and Tsai, S-M. Photo-sensitization of diazo disperse dye in aqueous acetone.
Chemosphere, 39(10), 1667–1677, 1999.
176. Park, T. J., Lee, K. H., Jung, E. J., and Kim, C. W. Removal of refractory organics and
color in pigment wastewater with Fenton oxidation. Wat. Sci. Technol., 39(10/11), 189–
192, 1999.
503
504
505