Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OPTICS
INTERFERENCE
The phenomenon in which alternate bright and dark bands are observed due to the
superposition of light waves proceeding from two coherent sources of light is known as
„Interference‟.
Two monochromatic sources of light are said to be coherent if they emit radiation of the
same wavelength with the same amplitude and with a constant or zero phase difference.
Coherent sources can be obtained in two ways;
i) Division of a wave front (Ex. Young‟s Double slit Expt.)
ii) Division of amplitude (Ex. Newton,s Rings, Air-Wedge)
Air Wedge (Wedge-shaped Film):
Expt. to measure the diameter of a thin wire (or) thickness of a very thin object:
An Air Wedge is formed between two optically plane glass plates by inserting a thin wire
(or a very thin object) of uniform cross section at one end. The other ends of the two
plates are in direct contact at O. Monochromatic light of wavelength from an extended
source is reflected vertically downwards on to the wedge by the inclined glass plate G. A
traveling microscope M is placed above G with its axis vertical. It is focused to observe
clearly the interference fringes in the light reflected from the air wedge (Fig. 1.a). These
interference bands are equidistant and are alternately bright and dark \with a constant
fringe width. By measuring the positions of different orders of dark bands using M, the
fringe width (β) is calculated. The distance of the object from the edge of contact (l) also
is measured. Knowing λ, the thickness (d) of the wire (or object) is calculated using the
l
formula, d .
2
M SOURCE S
G
S
B
E
Q
Q
A D
d
O t
P
O P
Fig. 1. (a) C
Fig. 1. (b)
2
Let Xm+1 and Xm be the distances of the (m+1)th and mth dark fringes from O. d =
diameter of the wire; l = distance between the edge of contact O and the wire and be
the angle of wedge. Then,
tm 1 tm d
tan (6) , since is very small
xm 1 xm l
d d
Using eqn. (6) we have, tm 1 xm 1 ; and tm xm
l l
d d d
tm 1 tm xm 1 - xm xm 1 - xm
l l l
d
But xm 1 xm fringe width . tm 1 tm
l
Substituting the value of tm 1 tm in Eq. (5), tm tm+1
d Q
we get 2
l
l d
................... (7) P
2 d O
Xm Xm+1
M
G SOURCE
Fig. 3. (a)
O
5
O C B
Plane-glass plate
AC = t
These two reflected rays „1‟ and „2‟ are coherent since they have been obtained by
division of amplitude of the incident monochromatic ray. Hence they can produce
interference according to the path difference (PD) at that place.
The total path difference is given by, d = Geometrical PD + PD due to phase reversal by
reflection at denser medium.
6
The geometrical PD between the two interfering rays is 2t cos r where t is the
thickness of air / any transparent film of Refractive index µ and r is the angle of
refraction. For normal incidence, angle of refraction r = 0 and so cos r cos 0 1 .
for normal incidence, TPD between the rays is d = 2t . --------- (1)
2
The nature of interference observed in the reflected light depends on the value of d
which in turn depends on the value of t. This is explained below.
1) When d is an integral multiple of , the rays suffer constructive interference
brightness). i.e., Condition to observe constructive interference is ,
d = 2 tm = m -- (2) where m is an integer.
2
2) When d is an odd multiple of /2, the rays suffer destructive interference (showing
dark bands). i.e., Condition for destructive interference is
d = 2tn = (2n 1) === (3) for nth dark band. Thus, nature of interference
2 2
depends on the value of total path difference (TPD) „d‟ which in turn depends on the
value of thickness of air film t at the point of interference.
The convex side of the lens is a spherical surface. So, all those points on the surface
of the lens from which thickness t of air-film is constant will lie on a circle.
If t corresponds to the condition eqn (2), constructive interference occurs at all these
points and hence bright circular band is observed . On the other and, if t corresponds to
the condition eqn.(3), dark circular band is observed due to destructive interference at
these points.
t
t
t1 <t2 < t3 ……
t3
t2
Glass Plate t1
tn
t = constant O n = 1,2,3….
Plane Glass Plate …..
At the point of contact, O, t = 0 (no air-film at point of contact). Using this in equation
(1), we have, TPD = d = 2 0
. This corresponds to destructive
2 2
interference. Hence at the point of contact O, a dark spot is observed.
7
Thus, Newton‟s rings experiment shows alternately bright and dark concentric
circular fringes with a dark spot at the center.
Condition for interference fringes
Let R be the radius of curvature of the lens . Let rn be the radius of the nth order dark ring.
Here tn is the thickness of transparent film of refractive index (RI) corresponding to nth
dark ring (For Air, = 1).
The condition for observing nth order dark band is
2 tn (2n 1) === (3) so that d is an odd multiple of /2.
2 2
Rearranging this, 2tn (2n 1) 2tn n …. (4)
2 2
Imagine that the convex surface of the lens is completed into a full sphere and
then cut into two halves. The circular cross section of a semi-sphere is shown in fig.
below. The line KCL drawn on the circle is the diameter of the nth order dark ring. Then,
KCL = 2rn.
Draw a line AXO passing through centre of sphere X and point of contact O. This will
be the perpendicular bisector to line KCL. Thus, AO = 2R and AX = XO = R
Hence, by geometry, AC x CO = KC x CL
i.e., [AO - CO] x CO = rn x rn
[2R- tn ] x tn = rn2 [2R tn - tn2 ] = rn2 ……… (5)
As tn is very small, tn2 can be neglected.
8
Using this in eqn. (4),the condition for observing nth order dark band,
rn 2 nR nR
n (or) rn 2 …….(7.a) rn . ……… (7.b)
R
For a given experimental arrangement, R, and are constants.
This implies that radius of nth dark ring, rn is proportional to square root of a natural number.
CALCULATION :
Let rn and rm be the radii of nth and mth order dark bands respectively. Then their
corresponding diameters are
Dn = 2rn and Dm = 2rm.
Hence, Dn2 = 4rn2 and Dm2 = 4rm2
(Dm2 - Dn2) = 4(rm2 - rn2) …… (8)
Using eqn. (7.a), in eqn. (8), we have,
R
(Dm 2 - Dn 2 ) 4 m n
( Dm 2 - Dn 2 )
Rearranging this, Radius of curvature of the given lens is R = . …….. (9.a)
4 m n
where µ is the RI of the transparent film between lens and glass plate.
For air-film µ =1.
( Dm 2 - Dn 2 )
R= ……. (9.b) for air medium between lens and plate.
4 m n
The quantities D m 21
2
- Dm9 2 , D m 18
2
- Dm6 2 , D m 15
2
- Dm32 etc are calculated
( Dm 2 - Dn 2 )
for all of which (m-n) =12. Then mean value of for different pairs of readings for
m n
which (m-n) is constant is found and substituted in the formula to find R.
To find RI of a liquid :
Few drops of the given transparent liquid whose RI is to be found is placed on a plane glass
plate. A convex lens of known radius is placed on the liquid. Newton’s rings are formed using a
monochromatic source and readings are observed and calculations are made as explained
( Dm 2 - Dn 2 )
above. Substituting the mean value of in formula eqn. (9.a), RI µ of the given
m n
transparent liquid can be found.
9
Light containing two wavelengths 1 and 2 falls normally on a convex lens of radius
of curvature R resting on a glass plate. If the nth dark ring due to 1 coincides with
(n+1) dark ring due to 2, show that the radius of radius of nth dark ring due to 1 is
R12
.
1 2
nR
Wkt rn 2 nR (for air, as =1) ------- (1)
Let rn and rn+1‟ be the radii of n th order ring due to 1 and (n+1)th ring due to 2 respectively.
Using (1), rn 2 nR1 ---- (2) and rn 1' n 1 R2 --- (3)
2
Given that nth dark ring due to 1 coincides with (n+1) dark ring due to 2 hence
rn =rn+1‟ rn2 =( rn+1‟)2
nR1 n 1 R2 nR2 R2 ----- (4) [using eqns. (2) and (3)]
Rearranging, nR 1 2 R2 (or)
2
n (5)
1 2
Using (1) the radius of nth dark ring due to 1 is rn nR1
R 1 2
Substituting from (5) we get rn . Proved
1 2
{Note:To find n, You can also use the relation 2tn = n1 and 2tn+1‟ = (n+1)2
as the condition for nth and (n+1)th dark ring due to1 and 2 respectively.
When they coincide
2tn = 2tn+1‟ n1 = (n+1)2 Rearrange and simplify you will get eqn(5) for n. }
Light containing two wavelengths 1 and 2 falls normally on a convex lens of radius
of curvature R resting on a glass plate. If the nth dark ring due to 1 coincides with
nth bright ring due to 2, show that the radius of the nth dark ring due to 1
R12
rn . What would be the resultant effect observed?
2 1 2
condition for nth dark ring due to1 is 2tn = n1 and
2
condition for nth bright ring due to 2 is 2tn‟ = 2n 1
2
When they coincide
2
2tn = 2tn‟ n1 2n 1 Rearrange and simplify to get eqn for n.
2
Use the formula rn nR1 to find rn
10
MICHELSON‟S INTERFEROMETER .
Michelson‟s Interferometer is one of the early sophisticated and sensitive
optical instruments.
CONSTRUCTION
Michelson‟s Interferometer consists of two highly polished mirrors M1 and M2 and two
optically plane glass plates G1 and G2. They are arranged as shown in the figure. The
Mirror M1 is mounted on a carriage C. M1 is moved parallel to itself by moving the
carriage C along a straight line using a micrometer screw, H. The distance moved by M1
can be measured using a micrometer scale, M. The mirror M2 is kept fixed. Both mirrors
M1 and M2 can be tilted using the screws behind them. They can be made perpendicular
to each other or inclined at an angle by suitably adjusting these screws.
Both the optically plane glass plates G1 and G2 are made of the sane material and
are of the same thickness. The plate G1 is half-silvered at its front surface. A single light
ray passing through G1 is split into two rays; one is the ray partially reflected at the thin
half-silvered coating and the other is the transmitted ray. Hence G1 is known as „Beam
splitter‟. The two rays are coherent since they are obtained by splitting a single ray.
Light from a source S is rendered parallel using a lens L. It is incident on Beam
splitter‟ G1 . Both G1 and G2 are kept inclined at 45 to the incident beam of light and
hence they are parallel to each other. A part of the light beam incident on G1 is reflected
at A on the silvered surface and it moves towards the mirror M1 while the rest is
transmitted towards M2.
H M
C
M1
S L A
G1 G2 M2
The beam traveling towards the mirror M1 is reflected at M1. It retraces its path
and travels towards the telescope after passing through G1. The transmitted beam is
11
reflected at the mirror M2. It retraces its original path and finally it is reflected at A
towards the telescope T. Both the rays moving towards the telescope are obtained from
the same incident ray and hence they are coherent. Therefore, they cause interference
effects by producing alternate bright and dark interference fringes. Depending on the
alignment of mirrors, the fringes are circular, straight or partially straight and partially
curved. These bands are observed through the telescope.
The light ray moving along AM1 and back is transmitted twice through the glass
plate G1 before it reaches the telescope. However, the rays moving along AM2 and back
never pass through G1 before reaching the telescope. This introduces an additional path
difference between the two interfering beams. In order to compensate the additional path,
another glass plate G2 is introduced between G1 and M2. The plate G2, known as
„compensating plate‟, is identical in thickness to G1 and is arranged parallel to it.
If M1 and M2 are perpendicular to each other, two images of source S reflected at
M1 and M2 can be seen through G1. These two images act as virtual sources S1 and S2
separated by a distance of 2.(d1d2) = 2d with an air film between them. Light rays from
these two sources reinforce one another giving rise to interference effects. If is the
wavelength of the monochromatic light, then the total path difference between the two
interfering beams is T.P.D = (2d + /2).Here 2d is the geometrical path difference and
/2 is the additional path difference due to phase reversal by reflection at the denser
medium (i.e., reflection at the glass plate). If T.P.D is equal to an integral multiple of ,
i.e., T.P.D = 2d + /2 = n, (n=0,1,2, … etc) the waves interfere constructively leading
to brightness. If it is equal to an odd integral multiple of /2, i.e., T.P.D = 2d + /2 = (2n-
1)/2, (n=1,2, … etc) the interference is destructive and the interference band is dark.
.. Types of Fringes observed .:
i)Circular fringes due to monochromatic source.
When the two mirrors
M1 and M2 are made exactly
perpendicular to each other,
the virtual sources S1 and S2
are parallel to each other. In
this case, with an extended
monochromatic source of
light, a number of concentric
circular fringes (alternately
bright and dark) will be
observed.
12
They are due to the superposition of waves from the two virtual sources, which are
inclined at the same angle to the normal to these sources. These are known as „fringes of
equal inclination‟. When the movable mirror M1 is moved parallel to itself by a distance
of /2, the total path difference changes by . Therefore, one fringe will appear from the
centre when T.P.D increases by and one fringe collapses at the centre whenever T.P.D
is decreased by .
ii) Circular fringes due to white light:
When white light is used as a source, alternate bright and dark rings due to different
wavelengths will be produced. However, due to the overlap of maxima due to one
wavelength with minima due to some other wavelengths, only a very few coloured rings
at the center will be observed. These rings correspond to a very small total path
difference (close to zero). This requires that 2d must be very nearly equal to zero. Hence,
to observe circular fringes due to an extended white light source, the two mirrors M 1 and
M2 are arranged perpendicular to each other with their distances d1 and d2 from beam
splitter G1 made equal so that 2d = 0; Also, the compensating plate G2 must be used
between G1 and M2 to cancel the additional path traveled by the ray AM1.
iii) Straight line fringes: If M1 and M2 are not perpendicular to each other, the
virtual sources will not be parallel to each other. Hence a wedge shaped air film will be
formed between them. When d1 and d2 are not equal, a part of fringes will be straight
while others will be curved. When d1 and d2 are made equal by suitably tilting M1, S1 can
be made to bisect S2. In this case many straight line fringes due to a monochromatic
source can be observed. When the mirror M1 is moved by a distance of /2, one straight
line fringe will cross the field of view at the center. Under similar conditions, with white
light, only a few straight line fringes will be seen.
USES OF MICHELSON‟S INTERFEROMETER
1. Wavelength of monochromatic light can be determined
2. Thickness of thin, transparent glass plates can be found.
3. Refractive indices of thin glass plates and gases can be found.
4. Used to standardize metre in terms of wavelength of a monochromatic source.
Determination of Wavelength of monochromatic source.
Monochromatic light of unknown wavelength is used as a source. Initial reading
on the micrometer scale M is noted. Using the handle H, the mirror M1 is moved and the
number of fringes N that crossed the field of view is counted. The distance „s‟ moved by
13
the mirror M1 is found from the micrometer scale readings. When the movable mirror is
moved by a distance of /2, the total path difference changes by and hence one fringe
crosses the field of view. The distance moved by M1 for N fringes is, s = N . /2
(or) = 2s/N Using the above formula the wavelength of the source is
calculated.
-------------------------------------------------------
. DIFFRACTION GRATING .
A diffraction grating consists of a large number of equidistant and very narrow
slits. Usually, a grating is constructed by ruling grooves with a diamond point on a
transparent glass plate or sheet. The rulings are equidistant and are of equal thickness.
The ruled grooves are opaque while the space between any two adjacent grooves is
transparent. A typical commercial grating has about 5000 rulings per centimetre length. A
slit of width „b‟ and its adjacent opaque ruling of width „a‟ on the grating constitute a
grating element of width d = (a + b ). Then the number of grating elements per unit
length is N = (1 / d ). N is also known as number of lines per unit length on the grating.
Diffraction of light by a diffraction grating:
Light from a monochromatic source of wavelength passing through a slit S is
rendered parallel using a lens L1. It is incident normally on the grating which consists of
N number of alternate very narrow opaque rulings and slits per unit length. These are
parallel to the source slit S. The separation between any two adjacent slits is equal to the
grating element d. Then N = (1/d). The Fraunhofer diffraction pattern is formed in the
focal plane of the lens L2. The diffraction pattern can be observed on the screen placed at
this focal plane. On either side of an intense undiffracted (0th order diffraction) light at Q,
(different orders of (1st, 2nd ,.. etc) principal maxima separated by minima are formed at
positions such as P.
AB and CH are adjacent slits (each of width b) separated by an opaque ruling BC
(of width a). AF, CG, HK indicate the direction of undiffracted light (i.e., incident
direction). AD, CE .. etc are the disturbances from the secondary wavelets passing
through these slits which make an angle with the undiffracted light; is called „angle of
diffraction‟. These rays reinforce one another at P. The rays from corresponding
14
AA
F
P
E
B θ
C’ G
S C Q
H K
L1 L2 screen
Grating
positions of different slits making the same angle with the incident direction will cause
interference effects at the focus (see Fig.). Thus, rays AF, CG, HK etc which are
parallel to incident direction ( = 0) are focussed at Q which is the undiffracted
maximum. Rays AD, CE ..etc, making the same angle with the incident direction will
cause the diffraction pattern at the focus P of the lens L2. The intensity of the diffraction
pattern at this point will depend on the path difference between the two rays from
adjacent slits.
To find the path difference between AD and CE, a line AC‟ is drawn
perpendicular to CE. CC‟ is the path difference between rays AD and CE. From ACC‟,
CAC‟ = path difference CC‟ = AC sin = d.sin …………….. (1)
(as AC = AB+BC = b+a = d)
The two rays will interfere constructively giving rise to nth order principal maximum if
the path difference goven in eqn (1) is equal to an integral multiple of wavelength .
i.e., dsinθ = n……… (2) where n = 1, 2, 3, …..
When this condition is satisfied, the nth order principal diffraction maximum due to light
of wavelength will be observed at an angle of diffraction by a grating of grating
element d. Using number of lines per unit length N = 1/d, we get,
sinθ = nN ……….. (3)
This equation is valid when the light is incident normally on the surface of the grating
(i.e., when the angle of incidence is zero).
15
4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4
4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4
8 7 is6 distributed
Intensity 5 4 among
3 2 1 the different
0 1 2 3 of
orders 4 spectra such
5 6 that
7 intensity
8 decreases
with increasing orders of spectral
Angle lines.
of Diffraction
Intensity
+
vice versa. This implies that both the
mth order principal maximum corresponding
to one of these wavelengths (say, +) and
the first secondary minimum of the mth
order principal maximum corresponding to
the other wavelength (say, ) occur at the
1 2 Angle of Diffraction θ
same angle of diffraction.
17
parallel by a collimating lens L1. D and (D - D) are the angles of minimum deviation of these
two wavelengths respectively. and - are their respective refractive indices. The telescopic
objective L2 focuses the emergent, refracted wavefronts of and +. at P1 and P2
respectively forming their line images.
A’
A D
D-ΔD
i (λ+Δλ)
E
θ P2
P1
B C
S (λ)
t
L1
L2
Since the prism faces are rectangular, each line in the spectrum may be considered as the
principal diffraction maximum (of order1) produced by a single slit of width „b‟ where b = CE is
the width of the emergent beam. Then according to the Rayleigh‟s criterion, if the rincipal
maximum due to + falls on the first secondary minimum due to and vice versa, then, two
spectral lines formed at P1 and P2 will be just resolved. Thus, at P2 , principal maximum due to
(+) as well as the first secondary minimum due to is formed.
From the theory for diffraction of light by a single slit, the condition for first
secondary minimum due to to be formed at P2 is given by
b.sin(D) =; As D is very small, sin(D) D
b.D = (or) D = /b ……….(1)
The refractive index of the spectral line due to is given by
19
A D
sin
2
. Differentiating this w.r.t. , we get,
A
sin
2
d 1 A D 1 dD
.cos . . Rearranging,
d sin A 2 2 d
2
dD 2sin( A / 2) d
= . . Multiplying both sides by ,
d cos(( A D) / 2) d
dD 2. sin(A/2) d
D = . = . . ………….(2)
d cos(A+D)/2 d
Using D = from eqn (1), this becomes,
b
2. sin(A/2) d
cos (A+D)/2 . d .
= ……….(3)
b
From the figure, = (90 – i ) where i is the angle of incidence.
A D
i= A D A D
But 2 sin = sin 90 = cos ……….. (4)
2 2
A D
As = 90 , we have A+D+2 = 180º ……(a) A
2
b
Using sin = in eqn. (4),
a
A D b
sin = cos = ……………(5)
2 a B (t/2) D (t/2) C
Substituting for Sin(A/2) and cos[(A+D)/2] from eqns (6) and (5) respectively in eqn (3), we
get, /b = [2(t/2a)]. (d/d). / (b/a)
t
2b
2a d d
. (or) RP = t. .
b d d
a
This is the required expression for Resolving Power of a prism.
As (d/d) is not a constant, the resolving power of a prism is not a constant but it is a
function of wavelength.
RESOLVING POWER OF A TELESCOPE
Telescope is an optical instrument which is used to see distant objects such as
stars. Resolving power of a Telescope is its ability to show as distinct and separate two
distant objects whose angular separation is very small. The Resolving power of a
Telescope is measured by the angle subtended by two objects at the objective lens of
the telescope whose images are seen just resolved in the telescope.
A T
α O
B
In the Figure, A and B are the two distant objects viewed by the telescope T. The
angle subtended by A and B at the objective O of the telescope is α. The minimum
angular separation at which the images of A and B are just resolved is known as the
„Limit of Resolution‟. Let angle θ be the Limit of resolution of a telescope. Then if α ≥ θ,
separate images of A and B are seen in the telescope. But, when α < θ, highly
overlapping, smeared out image of A and B is seen. So images are not resolved in this
case.
Thus, if α is the angle subtended by the two distant objects at the objective of the
Telescope for which θ is the Limit of Resolution, then,
When α = θ, the images seen in the telescope are just resolved.
When α > θ, the images seen in the telescope are well resolved.
When α < θ, the images seen in the telescope are not resolved.
21
CD = b
B C
D1 ᴧ
θ CDD1 = θ
A
θ
IA
IB
B1
θ
A1 D
Let CD be the aperture of the Objective lens of the telescope. Let AC and A1D be the
parallel rays from a distant object which are brought to focus at IA. Similarly, BC and B1D
are the parallel rays from a second distant object and they are brought to focus at IB. Let
θ be the angle subtended by the two objects at the objective lens. .
Assume that the aperture of the objective acts as a rectangular slit of width CD.
Then, the formation of images at IA and IB can be considered as Principal Maxima due to
diffraction of light from the objects by a single slit of width CD ( = b, say). These
principal maxima are followed by secondary diffraction minima and maxima due to the
rectangular aperture. .
Further, let us assume that the images of the two objects are just resolved. Then the angle
θ is the Limit of Resolution.
According to the Rayleigh‟s criterion, images at IA and IB will be just resolved if
the first secondary minimum accompanying the principal maximum at IA falls at IB and
vice versa.
To obtain an expression for the Limiting angle for resolution, with IB as centre and DIB
as radius, draw an arc to meet CIB at D1. By geometry, DD1can be approximated as a
straight line and the angle CDD1 = θ. Then in the Δ CDD1, (CD1/ CD) = Sinθ.
(or) CD1 = CD .Sinθ. CD1 = b.Sinθ ≈ bθ ( since θ is very small, Sinθ ≈ θ). If λ is
the wavelength of light from the objects, then the required condition for Ist secondary
minimum of IA to fall at IB is CD1 = bθ = λ. (or)
The Limit of Resolution is θ = ( λ / b )........ (1)
In real practice, the aperture is circular. Taking this into consideration the Limit of
Resolution is modified as θ = ( 1.22λ / D ), where the width b in eqn. (1) is replaced by
the diameter of the objective, D. In the case of circular apertures, the diffraction pattern
will be a central bright circle (principal maximum) followed by several dark and bright
22
concentric rings of increasing radii and widths. These are known as Airy‟s circular
pattern.
Resolving power of a Telescope will be larger if its limit of resolution θ is smaller. Thus
Limit of Resolution is a measure of Resolving Power. θ is small if the diameter D of
objective is large. When D is small, Airy patterns overlap more and hence the images are
not resolved. So, for better resolution, D should be large.
The radius of the 1st dark ring ( (i.e., 1st secondary minimum) is given by
r1 = (1.22λ.f/D) where f is the focal length of the objective lens.
. DOUBLE REFRACTION .
In a material, if a certain property is constant independent of direction, then the material
is known as isotropic. If some property varies with direction in a material, then it is
known as anisotropic
In Double Refraction (also known as birefringence) Refractive Index of light varies with
direction inside the material.
If a calcite or quartz crystal is placed on a dot marked on a piece of paper, two images of
the dot is observed. This is due to double refraction. The crystals which exhibit this
phenomenon are called „Doubly Refracting crystals‟.
In these materials, some optical properties (especially, the Refractive Index), vary with
direction. Hence these materials are optically „Anisotropic‟.
A light ray entering into a doubly refracting crystal (like calcite), splits up into
two rays. One of the rays follows the Snell‟s laws of refraction and it is known as an
“Ordinary ray ” (O-Ray). The other ray does not follow the Snell‟s laws of refraction. It
is known as an “Extra Ordinary ray ” (EO-Ray). O-ray exhibits isotropic behaviour, the
EO-ray shows anisotropic behaviour. Huygen explained double refraction by
applying his theory of secondary wavelets . According to this theory,
1. if one imagines a point source embedded in a uniaxial crystal such as calcite,
then, from any point inside the crystal two types of wave surfaces are
propagated.
2. The wave surfaces, which obey Snell‟s law, are called ordinary rays (O-Ray).
The velocity of the O-ray is the same in all directions within the crystal
3. The shape of the wave surface of the O-ray is spherical since its velocity is the
same in all directions.
4. The other ray, which does not follow the Snell‟s laws of refraction, is known
as an “Extra Ordinary ray ” (EO-Ray). The velocity of the EO-ray is different in
different directions.
5. The shape of the wave surface of the EO-ray is ellipsoid of revolution since the
velocity is different in different directions in the crystal.
6. The velocities of Ordinary and Extra Ordinary rays are equal along certain
directions in the crystal known as its „Optic Axis‟. Therefore the wave surfaces
of O- and EO-rays touch each other along the optic axis.
23
C D
Optic axis A B S’
S
K
E L
Optic axis
F
G
G’
O O’
24
( e o) . The optic axis is shown by the dashed straight lines passing through A
and B on SS‟. It lies in the plane of this figure but makes an angle with the crystal
surface. SS‟. When the incident light strikes the surface SS‟, each point on the surface
becomes a source of secondary spherical and elliptical waves due to Ordinary and Extra
Ordinary (O and EO) rays respectivelyA and B are two such points on the surface.
Consider the incident beam that strikes SS‟ at an instant t = 0. If Vo is the velocity of O-
ray, to find its position after a time of t seconds, a sphere of radius Vot is drawn with A
as center. Another sphere with the same radius is drawn with B as center. A common
tangent is drawn to these spherical wave surfaces and it touches the wave surfaces at K
and L as shown in figure.
Similarly, to find the position of EO-ray after t sec., ellipses with A and B as
centers and Vot as half of minor axis and Vet as half of major axis were drawn. Here, Ve
is the velocity of EO-ray. A common tangent drawn to the ellipsoidal Wave surfaces
touch these wave surfaces at E and F.
For the light ray incident at A, the line joining the points A and
K indicates the direction of ordinary ray inside the medium; the line joining A and E
gives the direction of EO-ray. Similarly for the ray incident at B, BL indicates the
direction of O-ray and BF indicates the direction of EO-ray. The ordinary ray is plane
polarized with its vibrations normal to both the optic axis and the direction of propagation
AKO. The Extra Ordinary ray is plane polarized with its vibrations lying in the plane
containing the optic axis and the EO-ray, AEG. This means that the vibrations of O-ray
are perpendicular to the plane of the figure while those of EO-ray lying in the plane of the
figure. They are represented by dots and arrows respectively.
Thus, an incident ray will split up into two rays
C D propagating in different directions and when they leave the
crystal, two linearly polarized beams traveling along
different parallel paths. Thus, two images (due to O and EO
EO O
rays) of a single object are seen. When the crystal is rotated
about its normal, the optic axis and hence the EO ray will
also rotate about the normal. This makes the EO ray to
rotate on the periphery of a cone. Therefore the image of
EO O
the object due to EO ray will rotate about the stationary
image due to O-ray.
Special Cases. 1). The optic axis lies in the plane of figure but normal to the surface SS‟
For normal incidence, the incident rays and optic axis are parallel to each other.
Insidethe crystal, the common tangent to the spherical wave surfaces starting from two
different points on the crystal surface coincides with the common tangent for elliptical
wave surfaces. Also the common tangents touch both the wave surfaces at the same
25
points on the optic axis where the two wave surfaces touch each other. Hence, both the
O and EO-rays are propagated along the optic axis with the same velocity. Therefore,
effects due to double refraction are not observable in this case.
2) When the optic axis lies in the plane of the figure and is parallel to the surface
SS‟ of the crystal: For normal incidence, the constructed wave surfaces will be as
shown in the figure. Common tangent to the spherical wave surfaces is parallel to that
for the ellipsoidal wave surface but they are not collinear. In this case, the two wave
surfaces travel along the same direction (i.e., direction perpendicular to optic axis) within
the crystal but with different velocities. This introduces a path difference between them.
As they emerge out of the crystal, they move with a constant phase difference between
them. This property is used in the construction of Quarter Wave and Half Wave Plates.
Quarter Wave Plate
Consider a thin plate of
uniaxial crystal cut in such a
way that its surface is parallel to
the optic axis. When
monochromatic light of
wavelength falls normally on
the surface of the crystal, it is
split into ordinary and Extra
ordinary (O and EO-rays). Both
O and EO rays travel in the same
direction which is perpendicular
to the optic axis but with
different speeds. This introduces
26
a phase difference between them, which increases with increasing thickness of the
crystal.
If the thickness „t‟ of the crystal is such that it introduces a phase difference of /2
radians between O and EO rays, it is known as a “Quarter Wave Plate‟. This is because a
phase difference of /2 corresponds to a path difference of /4. The optical path
difference between O and EO rays is = (e o).t where. e and o are the refractive
indices of the EO and O rays respectively. For a quarter wave plate, =/4.
Therefore, = (e o).t = / 4
t = / 4(e o)
Rhus t is the required thickness of uniaxial crystal to be a Quarter Wave Plate.
It should be pointed out that if t is an odd multiple of the above quantity,
i.e., if t = (2m + 1). [ / 4(e o)] where m= 0, 1, 2, ….etc.,
it will still produce a path difference of /4 between O and EO-rays.
Uses: 1). QWP is used to produce circularly and elliptically polarized lights. For
example,
2) It is used to analyse and to find the nature of polarized lights.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Half Wave Plate .(Diagram: Refer the diagram for QWP)
Similar to a quarter eave plate, a Half Wave Plate (HWP) is obtained by cutting a thin
plate of uniaxial crystal of thickness „t‟ such that its surface is parallel to the optic axis.
When monochromatic light of wavelength is incident normally on the surface it will be
split into ordinary and Extra Ordinary rays (O and EO rays) traveling in the same
direction but with different speeds. This introduces a path difference between O and EO
rays. The thickness of the crystal is such that the phase difference is which corresponds
to an optical path difference of /2 between the O and EO rays. i.e, optical path
difference between O and EO rays is
= (e o).t = / 2 t = / 2(e o)
where e and o are the refractive indices of EO and O rays respectively. This means that
the required thickness of the uniaxial crystal to be a Half Wave Plate is that,
t = / 2(e o). Also, when the thickness of the crystal is
t = (2m + 1). [ / 2(e o)] where m= 0, 1, 2, ….etc the path difference will still be /2.
Use: Half wave plate is used in the construction of a Half Shade which is an important
component of Laurentz Half Shade Polarimeter.
27
POLARIZED LIGHT
Consider light waves advancing in z-direction (moving out-of paper as shown in Fig.
below) In a light beam if all the waves have electric field vector varying along a single
direction, it is called „plane polarized light‟ or „Linearly polarized light‟ .
In addition, there are two more states of polarizations of light called „Circular‟ and
Elliptically polarized light.
y y
y
E E E
x x x
z
z
z
through zero (In Fig. above its vibration is along y-axis). Depending on the direction of
vibration, Linear Polarization can be vertical (vibration along y-axis), horizontal
(vibration along x-axis) or Linear Polarization along an arbitrary direction,
Linearly polarized light is also termed as plane polarized light since its electric field
vibration is restricted to be in one plane all the time.
In Circular polarization, electric field vector E rotates in the xy-plane (either clockwise
(CW)or counter clockwise(CCW)) with a constant magnitude. This motion of tip of
vector head of E sweeps a circle and hence it is called Circular polarization. CW rotation
corresponds to Right Circular polarization while CCW rotation corresponds to Left Circular
polarization. In general, Circular (as well as any arbitrary) polarization can be described as
a linear combination of orthogonal linear polarization states
In Elliptical polarization, electric field vector E rotates in the xy-plane (either clockwise
(CW)or counter clockwise(CCW)). As it rotates, magnitude of E vector changes
between a naximum and a minimum. The movement of tip of E sweeps an ellipse and
hence it is called Elliptical polarization.
It is common to have a mixture of un-polarized and polarized light, called partially
polarized light also.
THEORY:
General equation for Polarization (General case)
Generally, Any polarization state can be described as the sum of two orthogonal (i.e.,
mutually perpendicular) linear polarization states.
using trigonometric identities, squaring and adding eqns (1) and (2) we get, the
general equation for the resultant polarization is
2
Ex Ey
2
E Ey
2 x cos sin 2 ..........(4)
0x 0y
E E E 0x E 0y
Linear Polarization
The general equation for the resultant polarization
2
Ex Ey
2
E Ey
2 x cos sin 2 ....(4) will reduce to represent linear
E 0x E 0y E 0x E 0y
polarization when = 0.
For = 0, cos = cos(0) = 1 and sin=sin(0)=0. Using them in (4) and simplifying, we
have,
2
E E y E Ey
x 0 or x ,,,,,,,,,,,(6),
E 0x E 0y E 0x E 0y
(6) is an eqn. for straight line. So, this is general equation for linear polarization.
Special cases for linear polarization
When i) E0x = 0 eqns 1 and 2 are
E x (z,t) 0 ..........................(1.a)
E y (z,t) E 0y cos(kz- t ) y ..................(2.a)
30
There is only one component, in y (vertical) direction. Hence, the above set of eqns.
represents a vertically linear polarization.
(vertically linear)
Similarly, If there is no amplitude in y (i.e.,E0y =
0) there is only one component, in x that leads to
horizontal polarization. When E0y = 0 eqns 1 and
2 are ,
E x (z,t) E 0x cos(kz- t) x ..........................(1.b)
E y (z,t) 0 ..................(2.b)
(horizontally linear)
Vertical Polarization Ex = 0 Y
Horizontal Polarization Ey = 0
Ey E
45
x
Ex
Circular Polarization :
The general equation for the resultant polatization will reduce to circular polarization
when the phase difference is = 90 and the amplitudes of the two components are equal.
31
emerges through its other end. Thus the emergent beam is linearly polarized or plane
polarized (PPL).
Polarizing Nicol
EO - ray
Source
Plane Polarized Light
O - ray
UPL
PPL
light emerging through analyzer varies between zero and maximum twice. This is
because, as it is rotated, the OA of Analyzer twice becomes parallel to vibration of PPL
(0) and twice it is normal to it (90). When they are parallel, all the light is transmitted
through analyzer. Hence the intensity is maximum. As the angle increases from 0,
gradually the intensity decreases. When they are normal to each other, light is
extinguished (0 intensity), Thus it varies between zero and maximum.
Circularly polarized light (CPL): Circularly polarized light is the resultant of two
orthogonal (i.e., mutually perpendicular) plane polarized light rays which (i) have the
same maximum amplitude (E0x = E0y) and (ii) are moving with a path difference of /4
(or a phase difference of = /2).
Production of (CPL): Circularly polarized light can be produced by passing plane
polarized light (PPL) through a Quarter Wave Plate (QWP).
Plane Polarized light (PPL) is incident normally on surface of a Quarter Wave Plate
(QWP) such that its electric field vibration makes an angle of 45 with the optic axis of
Y Ey
33
P.D. = /4
X
Ex
QWP. In this case the PPL is split into O and EO rays inside the QWP with equal
amplitudes (E0x = E0y).
Incidenr vibration
CPL
Plane polarized
light (PPL) Quarter Wave
Plate (QWP)
Further, the QWP introduces a phase difference of /2 (i.e., a path difference of /4)
between them. As the two waves emerge out of QWP, their resultant will be circularly
polarized. As it moves, the tip of the resultant field vibration, traces a circle. It can be
either CW or CCW.
Behaviour: When Circularly polarized light is passed through a „rotating
analyzing nicol prism, the intensity of light emerging through analyzer remains constant.
It does not vary as the analyzer is rotated.
The same behaviour is observed when ordinary unpolarized is passed through a
rotating analyzer.
Elliptically Polarized Light (EPL)
Elliptically polarized light is the resultant of two orthogonal (i.e., mutually
perpendicular) plane polarized light rays which (i) have unequal maximum amplitudes
(E0x E0y) and (ii) are moving with a non-zero phase difference such that 0 and
90 (i.e they move with a non-zero path difference which is not equal to /2. So P.D. 0
and PD /2).
34
Superposition of a plane polarized light with a circularly polarized light will also
produce EPL.
Production of (EPL):
Plane Polarized light (PPL) is incident normally on surface of a Quarter Wave
Plate (QWP) such that its electric field vibration makes a non-zero angle with the optic
axis of QWP such that it is not equal to 45. In this case the PPL is split into O and EO
rays inside the QWP which move with unequal amplitudes (E0x E0y).
Incidenr vibration
EPL
Plane polarized
light (PPL) Quarter Wave
Plate (QWP)
As the components emerge out of the QWP, the resultant electric field vector E rotates in
the xy-plane (either clockwise (CW)or counter clockwise(CCW)). As it rotates, magnitude
of E vector changes between a naximum and a minimum. The movement of tip of E
sweeps an ellipse and hence it is called Elliptical polarization.
Behaviour: When Elliptically Polarized Light is passed through a „rotating
analyzing nicol prism, the intensity of light emerging through analyzer varies between a
maximum and a minimum which is not zero.
The same behaviour is observed when partially plane polarized light (PPPL) is
passed through a rotating analyzer.
2. ANALYSIS (or) DETECTION OF POLARIZED BEAMS OF LIGHT
For detecting the nature of the given polarized beam, an ‘Analyser’ is used. Any polarizer can be
used as analyser. (usually a Nicol prism is used). As the given polarized beam passes through the
analyser, the analyser is rotated. So,the optic axis of analyser makes different angles with the
vibrations of the beam. The resulting intensity variation will indicate the nature of polarized
light.
1) When Linearly polarized light is passed through a „rotating analyzer‟, intensity of
light emerging through analyzer varies between zero and maximum.
Analyzer
Intensity varies
between zero
and maximum.
2) When ordinary unpolarized Light and Circularly polarized light are passed through a
rotating analyzer, the intensity of emergent light remains constant. It does not vary as
the analyzer is rotated.
3) When partially plane polarized light beam and Elliptically polarized light beam are
passed through a „rotating analyzer‟, intensity of emergent light varies between a non-
zero minimum and a maximum.
TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN UNPOLARIZED LIGHT AND CIRCULARLY POLARIZED LIGHT.
When unpolarized Light and Circularly polarized light (CPL) are passed
through a rotating analyzer, the intensity of emergent light remains constant.
Analyser No Intensity
variation..
UPL / CPL
In order to distinguish between them, the beam is first passed through a QWP. If
it is circularly polarized, it is split into O and EO rays. The existing path difference
between O and EO rays would be increased from /4 to /2. This will convert CPL into
Plane polarized light. When this is analyzed, the intensity varies between zero and a
maximum.
Optic axis (OA)
Intensity varies
Analyser between
maximum & 0
CPL
PPL/UPL No Intensity
CPL / UPL variation..
UPL
Quarter Wave
Plate (QWP)
36
On the other hand, if the given light is unpolarized (UPL), it remains unpolarized even
after passing through QWP. Hence, when analyzed, this will not show any intensity
variation.
TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN PARTIALLY PLANE POLARIZED LIGHT AND ELLIPTICALLY POLARIZED LIGHT.
(TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN PPPL AND EPL)
Partially plane polarized light (PPPL) is a mixture of plane polarized light and
unpolarized light. When PPPL and elliptically polarized light (EPL) are analysed, they
show an intensity variation between a maximum and non-zero minimum.
PPPL /ECPL
In order to distinguish between them, the beam is first passed through a QWP and
then it is analysed. When passing through QWP, if it is elliptically polarized, it is split
into O
and EO rays. The existing path difference between O and EO rays would be increased
from /4 to /2. This will convert EPL into Plane polarized light. When this is analyzed,
the intensity varies between zero and a maximum.
If it is partially plane polarized light (PPPL), when passing through QWP, the polarized
part of the beam is converted to elliptically polarized but the unpolarized part remains
unpolarized. Just as they emerge from QWP the two components combine to produce
PPPL again. When this is analaysed, again it shows an intensity variation between a
maximum and non-zero minimum.
37
1. Testing of glass for optical quality: Glass used for making high quality optical
instruments (grating, prism, microscope, telescope etc) should be free from
defects, impurities. Strain etc. Strain could develop due to improper cooling of
molten glass while making the component. In most cases, strained glass is doubly
refracting. Testing the component for double refraction will reveal the presence of
strain.
OPTICAL ROTATION
When unpolarised light is pssed through two nicol prisms (polarizer and analyzer)
kept in a crossed position, emergent light is completely extinguished. If now certain
substances like calcite, quartz or sugar solution is introduced between the nicol prisms
some light will emerge through the analyzer. This is due to a phenomenon called optical
rotation or optical activity.
When polarizer and analyzer are kept in a crossed position their optic axes are
perpendicular to each other. Unpolarised light falling
on the polariser is polarized with its vibrations
parallel to the optic axis of the polarizer. When this
polarized beam falls on the analyzer, no light passes
through the analyzer since direction of vibrations of
polarized light is to the optic axis of the analyzer.
Therefore, light is extinguished. However, when
substances like sugar solution are introduced
between the polariser and analyzer, the plane of
vibration of the polarized beam is rotated through
some angle by these substances. Therefore, polarized
vibrations are no longer perpendicular to the optic
axis of the analyzer and hence some light passes
through the analyzer. To observe darkness again, the
analyzer has to be rotated through the same angle
through which the vibration is rotated in the medium.
Fresnel’s Theory of Optical Rotation
faster than OL inside the optically active medium, then, a phase difference of is
introduced between these two circularcomponents just as they come out of it. When they
come out of the medium they travel with the same velocity but their resultant vibration is
along XOX‟ which is rotated clockwise by an angle =/2 from the original direction
YOY‟. In the case of a left handed material, it is rotated in the anticlockwise direction.
Let l be the length of the optically active medium. Let VL and VR be the velocities of left
and right circular components respectively.
The time taken by left component to cross the medium = l / VL
The time taken by Right component to cross the medium = l / VR
Time difference as they emerge out, t = l.(1 / VL – 1 / VR)
The slower component will emerge out after a time of t after the faster component has
moved out of the medium. If C is the velocity of light in air, the faster component would
have moved through a distance of t.C in air just when the slower component comes out.
This gives the path difference between the two components in air.
Path difference t.C = [ l.(1 / VL – 1 / VR) ].C
= l.(C / VL – C / VR) = l.(L -R)
Corresponding phase difference = (2/).l.( L - R )
The resultant vibration is rotated through an angle = /2 = (l/).(L - R)
For right handed substances (L - R) is positive and for left handed substances
(L - R) is negative.
SPECIFIC ROTATORY POWER
The phenomenon in which the plane of vibration of polarized light is rotated by an
angle of is in a medium is known as optical activity. The substances, which cause this
optical rotation, are known as „optically active substances‟. Quartz, Sugar solution etc
are examples for optically active substances.
A substance, which rotates the plane of vibration in the clockwise direction, is known
as Right handed or Dextro Rotatory; A substance which rotates the plane of vibration in
the anti- clockwise direction, is known as Left handed or Laevo Rotatory.
In the case of sugar solution, the angle of rotation is directly proportional to the length
of the medium „l‟ (in dm) and the concentration of the solution „c‟ (in g/cc) at a constant
temperature. Thus, l.c (or) = lc where is called „specific rotatory power‟ of
the sugar solution. It is given by = /lc. If l is measured in cm, then =10/lc.
40
Specific rotatory power of an optically active substance is defined as the angle through
which the plane of vibration of the incident plane polarized light is rotated when it is
passing through the optically active medium of unit length (1 decimetre) and of unit
concentration (1 gram/cc)
UNIT: Deg.dm-1.(g/cc)-1
Specific rotatory power of an optically active substance is determined by measuring the
angle of rotation using Laurent‟s half-shade polarimeter.
Expt to determine the angle of rotation byLaurent‟s half-shade polarimeter (or)
Expt to determine the concentration of an optically active substance in a solution
byLaurent‟s half-shade polarimeter
Laurent‟s half-shade polarimeter is an instrument which is used to determine specific
rotatory power of an optically active substance in solution by measuring the angle of
rotation of a plane polarized light in the optically active medium. This instrument is
mainly used to determine the concentration of sugar in sugar cane and hence it is also
called as “Saccharimeter‟.
PRINCIPLE: A known amount of the optically active substance is dissolved in a known
volume of a solvent which is not optically active. The concentration c of the substance is
thus known. It is filled into a a transparent glass tube of known length, l. After measuring
the angle of rotation of a plane polarized light in the solution, specific rotatory power of
B
A’
S ’’
Q O G
L P HS T A E
HALF-SHADE
of two semicircular discs, one of ordinary glass G and other of quartz Q which is
optically active. The optic axis of quartz is parallel to the end surfaces. Suppose AOB is
the direction of vibration of the plane polarized light incident on HS. The vibration along
AO in the quartz portion is split into O and EO rays which travel in quartz with different
speeds due to optical activity. The thickness of Q is such that a path difference of /2 is
introduced between the ordinary and extra-ordinary rays in the quartz portion. Due to the
path difference of /2, the Resultant of the emergent O and EO rays is along OA‟ which
is rotated through 90 w.r.t. the incident vibration along AO. As glass is not optically
active, the vibration of the ray emerging from the glass portion is the same as that of the
incident ray, namely, OB. Thus the single ray of light incident on HS with vibration
A’ C’ B A’ C’ B A’ C’ B
O O O
C C C
along AOB is split into two vibrations along OA‟ and OB as they emerge out of HS.
When the position of the analyzing nicol A is adjusted such that the optic axis CC‟ of A
bisects the angle between OA‟ and OB, the intensities of light from both glass and quartz
portions of HS will appear equally bright. Hence, in the field of view of the the eye-piece
E, two equally bright half circular portions will be seen. But, if CC‟ makes different
angles with OA‟ and OB, then one half portion appears brighter while the other half
portion appears darker.
Experimental determination of angle of rotation
Initially the glass tube T is filled with the non-optically active solvent. The
analyzing nicol is rotated until the two semi-circular portions of the field of view appear
equally bright. The initial reading on the circular scale is noted as 1. Then the solvent in
the tube T is replaced by the optically active solution of known concentration c. Due to
optical rotation in the solution, the direction of vibration of light incident on HS is
different now. So, the equal brightness condition is altered. The equal-brightness
condition can be restored by rotating the analyzing nicol A through the same angle
42
through which the plane of vibration is rotated by the optically active solution in T. After
restoring the equal brightness condition in the field of view of E, the final reading 2 is
noted. The difference between the initial and final readings gives the angle of rotation
in the solution. Knowing the length of the glass tube T (l) and concentration of the
solution ( c ), the specific rotatory power of the optically active substance is calculated
10
using the formula . The experiment is repeated for different concentrations of
lc
the solution and the mean value of is determined.
If the specific rotatory power of a substance is known, then the unknown
concentration c of the substance in solution can be determined after measuring the angle
10
of rotation as described above using the formula, c
l
.
===============================================================
Numerical Problems
1. Two glass plates are in contact at one end and a wedge shaped air film is formed
between them by placing a thin object of thickness 0.02mm between them at a distance
of 10cm from the edge of contact. If monochromatic light of wavelength 6000AU falls
normally on the air-wedge what is the fringe width of the interference pattern formed
in the reflected light?
Given: = 6000AU = 6000x10-10m=6x10-7m; d = 0.02mm = 2x10-5m; l = 10cm =
-1
1x10 m
l6 107 1101
= 5
1.5 103 m 1.5mm
2d 2 2 10
2. Two glass plates enclose a wedge shaped air film. The glass plates touch each other
at one edge and are separated by a wire of 0.05mm diameter at a distance of 0.15m
frome the edge of contact. If a monochromatic light of wavelength 600nm from a
broad source illuminates the wedge, find out the fringe width. (PEC Dec. 2016)
Dia of wire, d =0.05mm = 5x10 m ; l = 0.15m; wavelength, = 600nm = 6x10-7m
-5
l 6 107 0.15
Fringe width, = 0.9 103 m 0.9mm
2d 2 5 105
3. Interference fringes are produced with monochromatic light falling normally on a
wedge shaped film of material of RI 1.4. The angle of wedge is 10 seconds of an arc
and the distance between successive fringes is 0.5cm. Calculate the wavelength of
monochromatic light.
10
Given: = 10sec = radians ; = 1.4 and =0.5x10-2m .As ,
60 60 180 2
10 3.14
2 2 1.4 0.5 102 = 6.7840x10-7m = 6784.0x10 -10m=6784AU
3600 180
43
8.In Newton‟s rings experiment. The diameter of 5th dark ring is 0.336cm and that of
15th ring is 0.590cm. If the wavelength of monochromatic light used is 5880AU,
calculate the radius of curvature of the plano-convex lens.
Given: m=15, n=5
D15 =0.590cm = 0.590x10-2m, D5 =0.336cm = 0.336x10-2m,
= 5880AU=5880x10-10m
( Dm 2 - Dn 2 ) 0.590 0.336 10
2 2 4
R= =
4 m n 4 15 5 5880 1010
9. Newton rings are obtained with reflected light of wavelength 5893 AU. If the
diameter of the 10th ring is 0.5cm, calculate the radius of curvature of the lens and
hence find out the radius of the 40th ring.
Given: = 5893 AU = 5893 x10 m ; n =10, D10 = 0.5cm,
-10
r 2 1 0.25 10
2 2
nR
rn 2 Radius of curvature of lens R n 1.06m
n 10 5893 1010
10. In Newton‟s rings experiment the diameter of the 10th dark ring changes from 1.40
to 1.27cm when a liquid is introduced between the lens and the glass plate. Calculate
the RI of the liquid.
Let rn’ is the radius nth ring formed in air & rn is the radius of nth ring formed in liquid of RI .
Given : rn = 1.27cm = 1.27x10-2m and rn’ = 1.40cm = 1.40x10-2m
nR
cm rn 2 ………………..(1) For air, =1. then
r '
2
1.402
rn ' nR.........(2) . Dividing eqn.(2) by eqn. (1), we have, n 1.215
2
rn 2 1.27 2
45
11. In a Michelson‟s interferometer, it is found that for 20 rings to merge at the centre,
the mirror has to be moved through 0.0059mm. Calculate the wavelength of light used.
Solution:
Distance moved by the mirror s = 0.0059mm = 5.9 x 10 6 m
No. of rings merged at the centre, n = 20
2s 2 x5.9 x106
Wavelength of light used, λ= = = 5.9x10 7 m = 5900 AU
n 20
12. In moving one mirror in a Michelson‟s interferometer, through a distance of
0.1474mm, 500 fringes cross the centre of the view. Find out Wavelength of light
used.
Solution: n = 500, s = 0.1474mm = 0.1474x10-3m
2s 2 0.1474 10 3
2s = nλ = = = 5896x10 10 m.
n 500
13. In moving the mirror M1 of Michelson Interferometer through a distance of
0.422mm, 1500 fringes are counted. Calculate the wavelength of light used .
(PEC Dec. 2015)
-3
s = 0.422mm = 0.422x10 m n = 1500
= 2s/n = 2x0.422x10 /1500 = 5.6267x10-7m =5626.7 AU
-3
14. In the Michelson interferometer, if one of the mirrors is moved by 0.04mm, 125
fringes cross the field of view. Calculate the wavelength of light used.
[Ans : 6.4x10-7m = 6400 AU] (PEC May. 2017)
15. A parallel beam of Na light is allowed to be incident on a plane grating having
4250 lines/cm and second order spectral line is observed to be deviated through
30º. Calculate the wavelength of the spectral line.
Given : 30; n 2; N 4.25105 lines / m Formula sin ;
nN
sin 30
sin 5882 10 10 m
: wavelength of the spectral line 2 4.25 10 5
nN
.
16. A diffraction grating used at normal incidence gives a line (5400A) in certain order
superimposed on another line (4050A) of the next higher order. If the angle of
diffraction is 30 degree, how many lines/cm are there in the grating?
[Ans: 3.0864x103lines/cm] (PEC May. 2015)
1 = 5400x10 m -10
order n1 = n (say)
2 = 4050x10 -10m
order n2 = n+1
They coincide and so have same angle of diffraction = 30
Sin = nN 1 = (n+1)N2 n1 = (n+1)2
nx5400x10-10 = (n+1)x4050x10-10 . Solving this, we get, n =3
So 3rd order line of first wavelength coincides with 4th order line of second wavelength.
46
17. Examine if D1 abd D2 lines of sodium will be clearly separated in the (i) dirst order
and (ii) second order by a 1” grating having 300 lines/cm. Wavelength of D1 and D2
are 589.6 and 589.0 nm respectively/. (PEC May 2018)
18. Calculate the thickness of a quarter wave plate for light of wavelength 4890AU.
(Given o = 1.5 and e = 1.52) (PEC May. 2016)
Given = 4890AU = 4.89x10 m, o = 1.5 and e = 1.52
-7
4.89 107
Thickness of quarter wave plate t 6.113x10-6m
4( e o ) 4(1.52 1.50)
19. Calculate the thickness of a half wave plate of quartz for a wavelength of 5000 AU.
Here E =1.553 and 0 =1.544. {Ans. 2.78x10-5}
(Use t= ) for half wave plate
2( E o )
20. The rotation in the plane of polarization (λ= 5893 AU) in a certain substance is
10 /cm. Calculate the difference between the refractive indices for the right and left
circularly polarized light in the substance.
[R L ] .
l
Solution: = 5893 AU = 5893 x 10-8 cm; l = 1 cm; = 10
10
5893 10
8
[R L ]
l 1
1.877 104 0.0001877
3.14
21. Determine the specific rotation of the given sample of sugar solution if the plane of
polarization is rotated through 13.2 . The length of the tube containing 10% sugar
solution is 20 cm.
10
Solution: Specific rotation, =
lc
13.2 c = 10% = 0.1 g/cm 3
l = 20 cm
10 13.2
= 66 dm-1.(g/cc)-1
20 0.1
22. A 0.20 m long tube containing sugar solution rotates the plane of polarization y
11 . If specific rotation of sugar is 66 , calculate the strength of solution.
Solution:
11 , l = 0.20 m = 20cm , S = 66
10 10 10 11
= c 0.0833g / cc.
lc l 20 66
47
24. A 20cm long tube containing sugar solution is placed between two crossed Nicols
and illuminated by light of wavelength 6000AU. If the specific rotation is /3 radian
and optical rotation produced is /15 radians, what is the strength of the solution?
(PEC Dec. 2016)
10
Specific rotation =
lc
Given, length of tube, l =20cm;
Specific rotation S = /3 radian = (/3) (180/) = 60 dm-1.(g/cc)-1
optical rotation produced is /15 radians
i,e., angle of rotation, = /15 radians = (/15) (180/) = 12
10 10 12
concentration of the solution, c = 0.1g/cc strength of solution is 10%.
l 20 60
Additional Problems:
1) A light wave of wavelength 590nm travels a distance of 1m in air. If the light travel
the same distance in water , what would be the path difference developed? (Velocity of
light 3x108 ms-1. RI of water = 1.33) [Ans: 0.33m] (PEC May. 2015)
l = 1m; w = 1.33 a = 1 velocity in air Va =3x108m/s
Time delay in travel t = l(1/ Va 1/ Vw) =
Path difference PD = time delay x velocity in air = tx Va
= l x Va (1/ Va 1/ Vw) = l (Va / Va Va / Vw)
PD = l x (1w) since w = ( Va / Vw)
Substituting, PD = l x (1 w) = 1x (11.33) = 0.33m Ans.
48
2. Calculate the specific rotation if the plane of polarization is turned through 26.4 in
traversing 20 cm length of 20% sugar solution.
{ Similar to pronlem no. 16. Ans. = 66 dm-1.(g/cc)-1 }
3. A 10cm long tube containing 10% sugar solution produces optical rotation of
13.2degrees. Find specific rotation of sugar. [Ans = 132 Deg/dm/cc]
(PEC May. 2016)
6. Explain Double Refraction in uniaxial crystals. What are +ve and –ve crystals?
Explain the theory and working of a quarter wave plate / Half wave plate and discuss
the Phase-shifting aspects of the polarized components through the plate.
7. Discuss the characteristics of differentbtypes of polarized beams of light.
8. Discuss the production, detection and analysis of PPL / CPL/EPL
9. Explain what is meant by optical rotation. Discuss the construction and working of
a Laurent‟s half-shade polarimeter. How is it used to find specific rotatory power of an
optically active solution?
10. Discuss the theory & construction of a Laurent‟s half-shade polarimeter. How
half-shade device is formed and used to find strength of sugar solution?
11. Write short note on the following
Double Refraction
quarter wave plate / Half wave plate
M
L
S G
Fig.