Companies Act 2013 Amended - Private Company Exemptions Reinstated - Corporate - Commercial Law - India

5/27/2016 Companies
Act 2013 Amended: Private Company Exemptions Reinstated Corporate/Commercial Law India
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more
here . Close Me
Home > India > Corporate/Commercial Law
India: Companies Act 2013 Amended: Private Company

Exemptions Reinstated
Last Updated: 3 July 2015
Article by Nikhil Joseph, Ruchir Sinha and Sangeeta Rana
Nishith Desai Associates Your LinkedIn
Connections at Firm
Most Popular Article in India, July 2015
1
Operational and administrative framework for private companies eased; attempt to align with the Companies, 1956
Restrictions on issuance of equity shares with differential rights by private companies removed
Ambiguity on whether the notification intended to permit treasury shares
INTRODUCTION
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ("MCA") notified on June 5, 2015 that certain provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 ("2013
Act") shall not apply to private limited companies or shall apply with such exceptions or modifications as directed in the
notification (the "Notification"). Under the Companies Act, 1956 ("1956 Act") private companies were subjected to a
substantially relaxed and relatively straightforward compliance regime. The 2013 Act, however, constrained the operational
flexibility hitherto available to private companies bringing them at par with public companies on several counts of compliances.
Finally, on the back of several representations by industry associations, the parliament has amended the 2013 Act to reinstate
the relaxed policy regime for private companies. This Hotline sets out the changes and the key takeaways from each such
change.
These exemptions and relaxations are applicable only to a private company which is not a subsidiary of public company. The
existing compliance requirements and restrictions will continue to apply to a public company and a private company which is a
subsidiary of public company.
1. RESTRICTIONS ON PURCHASE OF OWN SHARES
Existing position
Section 67(1) of the 2013 Act imposes restrictions on the companies limited by shares or by guarantee and having a share
capital including a private company to purchase its own shares unless the consequent reduction of capital is effected and
sanctioned under the provisions of this Act.
Revised position under the Notification
The Notification has exempted private companies from the applicability of provisions of Section 67 subject to fulfilment of the
following conditions:
The company shall have no shareholder which is a body corporate; and
Borrowings of the company from banks, financial institutions or body corporate should not exceed twice the amount of
paid up share capital or INR 500 million, whichever is lower; and
There shall be no subsisting defaults in repayment of such borrowings at the time of making transaction.
Analysis
Neither a private company, nor a public company was permitted to buy its own shares either unless coupled with
consequent reduction of capital under the provisions of Section 67(1). With the Notification now exempting private
companies from the application of Section 67 (1), there is ambiguity on whether the intent was to allow a private company
to buy its own shares without consequent reduction in capital.
Since both Section 100 of the 1956 Act and Section 68 of the 2013 Act contemplate consequent reduction in capital, it
remains to be seen what the intent of Notification was by exempting private companies from Section 67(1).
2. ISSUE OF SHARES WITH DIFFERENTIAL RIGHTS
http://www.mondaq.com/india/x/409358/Shareholders/Companies+Act+2013+Amended+Private+Company+Exemptions+Reinstated 1/7
5/27/2016 Companies Act 2013 Amended: Private Company Exemptions Reinstated Corporate/Commercial Law India
Existing position
Under the 1956 Act, private companies could issue equity shares with differential voting rights without having to comply
with certain rules and restrictions that otherwise applied to public companies and had full flexibility in structuring their
securities.
However, Section 43 of the 2013 Act prescribes that a company is allowed to have only two kinds of share capital equity
shares (with or without differential rights to dividend, voting or otherwise) and preference share capital. Further, all
companies are required to fulfil certain conditions to be eligible to issue equity shares with differential rights. This section
is essentially in the same form as it was under the 1956 Act, the only difference being that the 1956 Act exempted private
companies from the equivalent provision, and the 2013 Act (until recently) did not.
Section 47 of the 2013 Act provides that the equity shareholders shall be entitled to vote on all resolutions, while
preference shareholders are permitted to vote only on resolutions which would affect their rights or are in relation to
winding up or reduction of capital of the Company as prescribed under the 2013 Act.
The Notification provides that Section 43 and Section 47 of the 2013 Act will not apply to a private company if the
memorandum of association or the articles of association of such private company provides so.
Analysis
This relaxation would provide major relief, especially for private equity funds since they typically want priority on dividend,
liquidation and entitlement to vote on an asifconverted basis. Post the 2013 Act, there was difficulty in structuring
instruments with such rights, which will now be possible.
This exemption will also help in structuring returns and liquidation preference to foreign investors. While dividends on
compulsorily convertible preference shares issued to foreign investors entitle them to receive dividends at about 17%,
there is no such limitation if structured by way of equity shares with differential rights.
3. LOANS TO DIRECTORS AND INTERESTED ENTITIES
Existing position
Section 185 of the 2013 Act prohibited companies from advancing loans to directors and to persons in whom directors are
interested or give any guarantee or provide any security in connection with any loan taken by him or such other person, a few
exceptions aside.
The Notification currently provides that Section 185 shall not apply to a private company satisfying all of the following
conditions:
No body corporate shall have invested any money in the share capital of the company; and
The borrowings of the company from banks, financial institutions or any body corporate shall not not exceed twice the
amount of paidup share capital or INR 500 million – whichever is lower; and
There shall be no subsisting defaults in repayment of such borrowings at the time of making transaction.
Analysis
The restriction under Section 185 was one of the most significant pain points under the 2013 Act. This has probably been
the most resisted provision by the industry. Considering the closely held nature of private companies and the way in
which such companies function, it was expected that intragroup transactions between private companies be relaxed
However, exemption from Section 185 being contingent on the condition that no body corporate being a shareholder and
debt – equity ratio being no more than 2:1 substantially restricts the applicability of the exemption. It also remains to be
seen whether convertible debt on the books of the company will be seen as debt or equity.
4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Existing position
Section 2(76) of the 2013 Act includes a holding company, subsidiary, associate company (including a joint venture
company) and a subsidiary of a holding company to which the company is also a subsidiary (collectively, the "Group
Companies"), within the definition of the term 'related party' of a company.
If a private company intended to enter into a contract/ arrangement with any of the Group Companies with respect to
sale, purchase or supply of any goods or materials, selling or otherwise disposing of, or buying, property of any kind,
availing or rendering of any services, etc., such transaction would require the approval of the board (as well as the
shareholders of the company, if the contract/ arrangement meets certain conditions as specified under the Companies
(Meetings of the Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014) in accordance with Section 188(1) of the 2013 Act.
As per the second proviso to Section 188(1), a shareholder interested in such contract/ arrangement would be prohibited
from voting on the resolution to be passed to approve the contract/ arrangement in which such member is interested.
The Notification provides that, in relation to a private company, the entities specified in Section 2(76)(viii) of the 2013 Act
(i.e., the Group Companies) would not be considered related parties for the purposes of Section 188. As a result of this
relaxation, private companies shall not be required to obtain the approval of the board or the shareholders, for the
purpose of entering into a contract/ arrangement with a Group Company.
The Notification also exempts private companies from the ambit of the second proviso to Section 188(1). This exemption
will permit members of the company interested in the contract/ arrangement to vote on the resolution for authorizing the
related party transaction.
Analysis
This relaxation would make transactions between closelyheld group private companies smoother, without the
requirement for any cumbersome approvals process. Intragroup transactions would be made simpler, considering the
frequent sharing of manpower and other business resources amongst closelyheld group companies.
The Notification also addresses the practical challenges of obtaining consent for related party transactions in closely held
companies, as many of them lacked disinterested directors as well as members. With this relaxation, an interested
director and member would now be free to vote on resolutions with respect to related party transactions.
Since the Notification does not exempt private companies from the applicability of Section 2(76)(iv) of the 2013 Act, if the
directors or managers in one private company are directors or members in another private company, a transaction
between the two such companies would be considered as a related party transaction despite the exemption granted from
Section 2(76)(viii).
5. FURTHER ISSUE OF SHARE CAPITAL
Existing position
Section 62(1)(a)(i) of the 2013 Act provides that the offer period for a rights issue should be for a minimum period of 15
days from the date of opening of the offer. Section 62(2) of the 2013 Act also requires the company to dispatch the offer
letter in respect of the rights issue through speed post or registered post or electronic mode to all the shareholders at
least 3 days before the date of opening of the issue.
Further, the approval of the members of the company by way of a special resolution was required for the purpose of
issuance of ESOPs.1
The Notification introduces a new proviso to Section 62(1)(a)(i), which provides that if at least 90% of members of a
private company give their consent in writing or in electronic mode, a period lesser than that specified for minimum offer
period and period for dispatch of rights issue offer letter can be adopted in respect of the rights issue.
In respect of issue of ESOPs, the Notification now requires the members of the private company to approve such
issuance by way of an ordinary resolution.
Analysis
The Notification enables private companies to meet their funding requirements at a shorter notice, without the
requirement of complying with a minimum offer period of 15 days.
The Notification remains ambiguous as to whether the consent of 90% of the shareholders by value or by number has to
be obtained. It would be prudent to assume that the Notification implies that consent of 90% of the shareholders by value
would be required for the reduction of the time periods mentioned in Sections 62(1) and 62(2).
The Notification would also ease the process of issuance of ESOPs to employees of private companies.
6. EXEMPTION FROM PROVISIONS DEALING WITH CORPORATE BORROWINGS AND CREATION OF
CHARGE ON ASSETS
Existing position
Section 180(1) of the 2013 Act provides that the board may exercise its power in respect of the following matters only with the
approval of members by way of special resolution:
Sale, lease or disposal of the whole or substantially whole of the undertaking of the company;
Investment of the amount of compensation received by the company as a result of merger or amalgamation in trust
securities;
Borrowing money exceeding the aggregate of the company's paidup share capital and free reserves; and
Remittance or granting time for the repayment of, any debt due from a director.
The Notification exempts a private company from the applicability of provisions of Section 180 of the 2013 Act.
Analysis
This exemption will avoid unnecessary delays in obtaining shareholders' approval by way of special resolution for the specific
matters in Section 180 of the 2013 Act, thereby facilitating ease of operation of private companies. On a practical note, this
would ease approvals for slump sale and asset sale transactions by private companies.
7. PARTICIPATION OF INTERESTED DIRECTORS
Existing position
Section 184(2) of the 2013 Act requires interested directors to disclose his/ her interest at the board meeting in which the
contract or arrangement is discussed and abstain from participation in discussions pertaining to such contract or arrangement.
The Notification provides that an interested director may participate in the board meeting after disclosing his/ her interest. This
relaxation however, is subject to the director providing disclosures of his interest in the prescribed form before he/ she
participates in the meeting.
Analysis
Prior to this exemption, many private companies have found it difficult to comply with the provisions of Section 184(2),
especially in a situation where there are only 2 directors and either one or both of them are interested.
Absence of disinterested directors often led to certain peculiar compliance issues in private companies with two directors,
such as not being able to enter details of contracts in the register of contracts, as the board of directors was not permitted
to take note of related party contracts. Such issues have been solved under the Notification.
8. ACCEPTANCE OF DEPOSITS
Existing position
Under Section 73(2) of the 2013 Act, the acceptance of deposits by a company from its members requires the approval of the
members by way of ordinary resolution and the fulfilment of certain conditions, including the issuance of circular including a
statement showing financial position of the company, creation of a deposit repayment reserve account, obtaining deposit
insurance, obtaining a certificate from the directors that the company has not defaulted in repayment of deposits accepted etc.
The Notification has exempted private companies from the above requirements provided that the amount of deposit accepted
by the private company does not exceed 100% of aggregate of paidup capital and free reserves of the private company and
the relevant filings with the Registrar of Companies has been made.
Analysis
Rule 3(3) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 ("Deposit Rules") provides that a company cannot
accept or renew any deposits from its members, if the amount of such deposits together with the amount of other
deposits outstanding as on the date of acceptance or renewal of such deposits exceeds 25% of the aggregate of the
paidup capital and free reserves of the company. Since the Deposit Rules have not been amended by the Notification,
there appears to be a conflict between the provisions of the Notification and those of the Deposit Rules in respect of
private companies.
Although this relaxation does not liberalize acceptance of deposits by private companies to the extent of the position
under the 1956 Act, it eases the acceptance of deposits by private companies from its members as a mode of catering to
their immediate funding requirements.
9. CONDUCT OF GENERAL MEETINGS
Existing position
Sections 101 to 107 and Section 109 of the 2013 Act deal with the requirements of convening and conducting of general
meetings by all companies, such as service of notice of general meeting, explanatory statement, quorum, chairperson of the
meetings, appointment of proxies, restriction on voting rights, voting by show of hands and demand for poll.
As per the Notification, the provisions of Sections 101 to 107 and Section 109 of the 2013 Act shall apply to a private company
unless otherwise specified in the respective Sections or the articles of a private company provide otherwise.
Analysis
Under the 1956 Act, a private company could lay down its own procedure in respect of conduct of its general meetings.
This power was not available under the 2013 Act.
The Notification has restored this power and provided private companies with the flexibility to decide their own procedure
for conducting general meetings by incorporating the provisions in their articles of association.
10. FILING OF BOARD RESOLUTIONS WITH AUTHORITY:
Existing position
Section 117(3) (g) of the 2013 Act requires companies to file with the Registrar of Companies, copies of board resolutions
passed in connection with certain matters dealt with under section 179(3) and the rules framed thereunder. These matters
include:
making calls on shareholders in respect of money unpaid on their shares
authorizing buyback of securities under Section 68
issuance of securities, including debentures, whether in or outside India
borrowing of monies
investing the funds of the company
granting loans or giving guarantee or providing security in respect of loans
approving financial statement and the Board's report
diversifying the business of the company
approving amalgamation, merger or reconstruction
taking over a company or acquiring a controlling or substantial stake in another company
additional matters as prescribed under Rule 8 of Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014
The Notification now provides that Section 179(3) of the Act shall not apply to a private company.
Analysis
This exemption would restrict public access to board proceedings of private companies and thereby help in maintaining
the confidentiality of the board proceedings.
This exemption would also reduce the compliance burden on private companies.
11. COMPANIES UNDER AUDIT SCOPE
Existing position
Section 141(3)(g) of the 2013 Act restricted the number of companies, including private companies, for which a person could
be statutory auditor to 20. An auditor who engages himself for the purpose of statutory audit in more than 20 companies, would
attract to disqualification and liable to vacate office.
The Notification excluded oneperson companies, dormant companies, small companies and private companies having paid up
share capital of less than INR 1 billion in determining the audit limit threshold of 20 companies.
Analysis
In addition to removing restrictions on auditors, this relaxation would permit private companies which are part of the same
group to retain the same statutory auditor.
12. APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS
Existing position
Section 160 of the 2013 Act prescribes certain processes to be followed by a person who intends to stand for directorship
of the company.
Further, Section 162 of the 2013 Act prohibits companies from passing a single resolution for appointment of 2 or more
directors unless such a motion has first been agreed to unanimously by all the shareholders.
The Notification exempts a private company from the applicability of Sections 160 and 162 of the 2013 Act.
Analysis
This exemption would ease compliance requirements for private companies in respect of appointment of directors.
13. APPOINTMENT OF MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL
Existing position
Subsections (4) and (5) of Section 196 of the 2013 Act deal with the procedure and approval requirements for appointment
managing director, manager or wholetime director ("Managerial Personnel") and requires companies to comply with the
provisions of section 197 and Schedule V with respect to remuneration payable to Managerial Personnel. The provisions
require approval of board at a meeting followed by approval of members in the next general meeting for appointment of
Managerial Personnel. The company is also required to file return of appointment of Managerial Personnel within 60 days from
the date of such appointment.
The Notification exempts private companies from the applicability of subsections (4) and (5) of Section 196 of the 2013 Act.
Analysis
With this exemption, private companies are set free from the following requirements with respect to appointment of Managerial
Personnel:
Requirement of seeking approval of members and of Central Government where the appointment of Managerial
Personnel is not in accordance with the provisions of Schedule V.
Requirement for notice convening the board or general meeting for considering Managerial Personnel's appointment shall
include terms and conditions of such appointment, remuneration payable and other matters including interest of a director
or directors in such appointment.
Requirement of filing return of appointment of Managerial Personnel with the Registrar of Companies.
Provisions governing validity of acts of Managerial Personnel not being approved by the members.
CONCLUSION
The Notification is a welcome move towards easing the operations of private companies. It may be observed that in many of
the cases above, certain provisions of the 2013 Act caused difficulties in the very operations of private companies. The
Notification attempts to remove the same and has succeeded to a great extent.
Footnote
1 A matter requiring consent of the shareholders by ordinary resolution may be approved by a simple majority of the shareholders voting on such matter,
while a matter requiring consent of shareholders by special resolution would require the approval of 75% of the shareholders voting on such matter.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about
your specific circumstances.
Do you have a Question or Comment? Interested in the next Webinar on this Topic?
Click here to email the Author Click here to register your Interest
Contributor
Nikhil Joseph Email Firm More from this Firm
Nishith Desai Associates More from this Author
News About this Firm
Authors
Nikhil Joseph Ruchir Sinha Sangeeta Rana
Nishith Desai Associates Login with LinkedIn
See how your LinkedIn network connects you to Nishith Desai Associates.
In Your Network powered by
Contact Us | Your Privacy | Feedback
© Mondaq® Ltd 1994 2016
All Rights Reserved


Companies Act 2013 Amended - Private Company Exemptions Reinstated - Corporate - Commercial Law - India

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Companies Act 2013 Amended - Private Company Exemptions Reinstated - Corporate - Commercial Law - India

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

5/27/2016 Companies

India: Companies Act 2013 Amended: Private Company

Contact Us | Your Privacy | Feedback

You might also like