Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
Startup
ecosystems
in
emerging
countries
are
very
different
from
those
in
developed
economies.
Instead
of
just
replicating
exactly
their
entrepreneurial
practices,
they
must
be
adapted
to
emerging
economies
conditions.
The
Startup
Journey
Project
(SJP)
is
a
methodology
to
improve
the
odds
of
success
for
startups
in
emerging
countries.
Based
on
concepts
transferred
from
the
evolutionist
model,
as
well
as
inspired
in
software
development
methodologies,
specifically
the
Customer
Journey
Analysis,
SJP
offers
a
model
to
analyze
the
gaps
among
the
particular
entrepreneurship
practices
(“Premes”)
in
which
a
startup
needs
to
excel
in
a
restrictive
environment,
and
those
practices
already
accomplished.
Introduction
Successful
starting
up
a
new
dynamic
and
innovative
company
is
very
difficult.
The
high
percentage
of
startups
that
fail
in
emerging
markets
shows
that
we
still
lack
a
methodology
that
allows
us
to
improve
the
success
rates.
The
multidimensional
challenges,
obstacles
and
surprises
that
a
project
faces
during
its
startup
journey
are
multiple
in
number
and
nature.
Additionally,
these
challenges
differ
among
many
types
of
projects
and
scenarios,
they
are
unknown
and
they
also
change
over
time.
If
being
an
entrepreneur
is
difficult
everywhere,
in
emerging
countries
is
even
more
complicated,
not
only
because
of
restrictive
conditions,
but
also
due
to
our
common
habit
of
importing
models,
methodologies
and
entrepreneurial
practices
from
developed
countries
that
may
be
valid
for
them,
but
which
don’t
necessarily
apply
in
developing
economies.
Differences
in
our
entrepreneurial
ecosystems
are
not
limited
to
customer’s
purchasing
power,
banking
services
penetration,
technology
penetration
or
market
size.
Established
companies
often
do
not
compete
fiercely
because
of
their
comfortable
dominant
positions,
they
don´t
need
to
innovate
much
and
consequently
they
don´t
conduct
serious
open
innovation
processes
that
could
drive
demand
to
startups.
Electroniccopy
Electronic copyavailable
available at:
at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862777
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862777
Universities,
meanwhile,
have
not
decidedly
adopted
entrepreneurship
and
entrepreneurial
training
so
they
are
not
really
making
an
impact
in
the
entrepreneurial
culture,
knowledge,
skills
or
intellectual
capital
property.
As
a
result
of
this
scenario,
in
emerging
countries
there
are
no
relevant
amounts
of
venture
capital
or
funds
that
will
take
more
risk,
neither
a
dynamic
stock
market
to
boost
the
initial
public
offering
(IPO)
of
new
companies.
From
this
perspective,
it
is
clear
that
just
replicating
entrepreneurial
practices,
which
could
work
well
in
developed
economies,
will
not
produce
similar
outcomes
in
emerging
ones.
The
aim
of
SJP
is
to
help
the
entrepreneurs
who
face
the
huge
challenge
of
starting
a
new
company,
providing
them
a
new
methodological
model
that
improves
their
projects
survival
and
success
rates,
based
on
the
identification
and
analysis
of
suitable
entrepreneurial
practices.
Although
the
concepts
in
this
analysis
can
be
applied
to
any
scenario,
its
application
has
to
consider
the
specific
conditions
for
particular
ecosystems.
By
combining
these
techniques,
we
seek
to
develop
a
methodology
that
signals
the
entrepreneurial
project,
our
main
study
subject,
revising
its
level
of
compliance
with
respect
to
a
pattern
of
attributes
that
characterizes
successful
projects
in
similar
environments.
Its
application
in
emerging
economies
can
allow
us
to
determine
a
specific
pattern
guide
for
projects
in
this
environment.
We
will
focus
this
effort
in
the
entrepreneurial
project,
as
the
analysis
unit.
Its
main
constituent
elements
are:
the
team
project,
the
problem
or
opportunity
to
be
addressed,
the
proposed
solution,
the
strategies
used,
the
business
model,
resources
required
or
allocated
and
practices
carried
out.
1
We will use the term “attribute” to represent features, abilities or skills of the entrepreneurial team, the
project, the opportunity, the solution or the entrepreneurial process.
Electroniccopy
Electronic copyavailable
available at:
at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862777
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862777
SJP
seeks
to
provide
guiding
information
for
to
two
types
of
readers:
entrepreneurs,
in
relation
to
their
projects,
and
public
policy
makers
to
promote
entrepreneurship
in
their
ecosystems.
• The
purchasing
power
and
the
level
of
banking
use
of
the
people
is
low.
• Local
talent
is
not
sufficiently
trained
in
entrepreneurship
theory
yet.
There
is
not
enough
experience,
and
relevant
information
is
not
widely
available
in
native
languages
or
could
not
apply
to
local
markets.
• Big
corporations
usually
don´t
face
high
levels
of
competition
yet,
so
they
are
not
compelled
to
collaborate
with
startups
in
open
innovation
modes
to
produce
competitive
advantages
as
much
as
in
developed
markets,
with
the
consequent
benefit
and
support
that
this
would
represent
for
startups.
As
a
result,
entrepreneurs
have
less
inclination
to
create
disruptive
products
and
services.
• Universities
have
not
massively
developed
mechanisms
to
transfer
Intellectual
Property
to
the
private
sector
yet,
which
could
eventually
provide
some
advantages
to
new
companies.
Collaboration
between
companies
and
universities
is
rather
scarce.
• Regulatory
structures
are
very
slow
and
do
not
provide
effective
Intellectual
Property
protection.
• Ecosystems
are
not
mature
enough:
venture
capital
funding
is
not
abundant
and
the
support
of
companies
as
potential
customers
for
startups
is
scarcer.
The
possibility
for
a
startup
to
make
and
Initial
Public
Offering
(IPO)
is
almost
impossible.
Electroniccopy
Electronic copyavailable
available at:
at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862777
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862777
ecosystem.
To
have
a
better
chance,
emerging
countries
projects
must
rely
on
features
in
the
particular
space
in
which
they
will
operate,
to
get
a
natural
protection
against
the
entry
of
powerful
competitors
from
developed
countries.
For
instance,
an
entrepreneurial
project
can
focus
on
solving
emerging
problems 2 .
It
also
should
urgently
try
to
reach
breakeven,
considering
the
local
venture
capital
scarcity.
The
Appropriability3
advantage
should
be
obtained
through
strategies
that
are
not
based
just
on
patents.
Companies
should
be
designed
to
stay
for
a
long
time
and
not
just
to
be
sold,
because
acquisitions
are
rare4.
These
are
just
examples
among
many
other
considerations,
but
they
allow
us
to
show
that
the
profile
of
a
successful
startup
in
emerging
countries
necessarily
differs
from
the
corresponding
one
from
developed
countries.
So,
exact
replication
may
not
work
as
well
has
hoped.
Finally,
we
must
precisely
define
what
we
will
consider
a
successful
entrepreneurial
project
in
the
context
of
emerging
countries
so
we
can
profile
them.
From
the
limited
history
of
existing
successes
in
our
economies,
this
definition
differs
from
that
obtained
from
developed
countries,
which
is
basically
determined
by
indicators
such
as
user
traction,
high
sales,
high
valued
IPO’s
or
sky
rocketed
acquisitions
(even
when
some
of
the
companies
still
show
big
financial
losses).
In
developing
countries,
considering
the
restrictions
previously
mentioned,
we
defined
a
successful
project
as
the
one
that
achieves
at
least
two
of
the
following
conditions:
stable
breakeven5,
significant
independent
funding6
or
minimum
annual
contribution
margin
equivalent
to
USD
100,000
in
year
three7.
Evolutionism
The
biological
evolutionary
discipline
will
be
the
second
contributor
to
the
development
of
SJP
methodology.
2
Emerging
problems:
those
that
don’t
exist
in
developed
markets,
so
their
startups
won´t
try
to
solve
reach
financial
equilibrium.
At
the
same
time,
we
want
to
focus
on
breakeven
because
we
consider
this
a
critical
goal
for
emerging
markets
startups.
6
To
get
a
significant
investment
from
a
third
party
means
that
some
independent
player
carefully
studied
the
startup
and
its
parameters.
It
represents
a
success
predictor
by
itself,
widely
used
in
emerging
markets,
although
it
doesn´t
necessarily
implies
that
the
startup
will
succeed
in
scaling.
The
precise
definition
of
“significant
investment”
in
every
scenario
will
be
relevant
to
distinguish
real
successful
startups
from
just
candidates.
7
Contribution
margin
goal
can
change
country
to
country.
This
is
the
estimated
for
Chile.
Premes
In
emerging
countries
it
is
imperative
for
startups
to
really
focus
on
surviving
through
reaching
financial
breakeven.
Applying
the
evolutionist
model
to
the
entrepreneurial
process,
we
discover
that
companies
that
survived
and
were
later
reference
cases
have
similar
attributes.
Interestingly,
some
of
these
attributes
are
similar
to
those
of
developed
countries,
but
others
are
not.
In
addition,
some
attributes
are
very
specific
to
spaces
in
which
startups
are
taking
place.
The
model
of
a
real
startup
genome
begins
to
make
sense.
This
is
not
surprising
for
the
evolutionist
observer,
since
we
know
that
different
species
present
some
common
genes
in
their
genomes,
but
differ
in
the
rest.
This
structure
allows
them
to
develop
more
adjusted
or
fitted
aptitudes
to
survive
in
their
specific
conditions.
The
same
is
valid
for
startups.
For
example,
every
9
Any
kind
of
resources:
funding,
energy
or
time.
10
The
word
“Premes”
was
coined
attending
to
the
original
biologic
and
cultural
evolutionist
terms,
“genes”
and
“memes”.
In
general,
preme
will
refer
to
characteristics
under
the
startup
team
control,
so
they
can
be
generalized
as
entrepreneurial
practices.
Environmental
characteristics
don´t
constitute
premes,
unless
the
team
to
benefit
their
project
used
them.
Process
events
or
milestones
are
not
premes
either.
They
are
just
their
manifestations
in
the
startup
life
cycle.
11
Even
not
being
evident,
the
search
for
fit
premes
has
been
in
place
since
a
while,
through
the
proliferation
of
papers
and
articles
about
lists
of
“Best
unicorn
practices”,
“Successful
founders
characteristics”
and
others.
12
In
entrepreneurship
“The
Valle
of
Death”
term
refers
to
the
dangerous
initial
period
of
the
project’s
lifecycle,
when
expenses
are
bigger
tan
revenue.
This
period
goes
from
launching
of
the
startup
to
reaching
breakeven.
[Musso
y
Echecopar,
El
Valle
de
la
Muerte,
2012]
Graphic Representation
While
the
use
of
the
paradigm
based
on
premes
doesn’t
necessarily
require
a
link
with
the
temporal
dimension,
we
present
these
attributes
in
a
timeline
to
facilitate
the
comprehension
and
to
highlight
the
changing
relevance
of
premes
depending
on
the
stage
the
startup
is
going
through.
13
Beinhocker
Erick,
2007,
The
Origin
of
Wealth:
The
Radical
Remaking
of
Economics
and
What
it
'
PRE'START:'
An-cipa-on'
Time*
Biz'Model'
Death&Valley& Break*Even*
va- '
on
'
Ac- ART:
Exposure'to'
ST
Entrepreneurship'Theory'(Slicing'Pie,'Globaliza-on,'Adapta-on,'Appropriability,''
Valua-on,'Digital'Strategy,'…)'
Fig.
1.
The
Startup
Journey
Model
The
diagram
shows
a
startup
lifecycle,
highlighting
through
vertical
arrows
the
various
premes
that
are
necessary
at
each
stage.
Even
those
premes
inherited
from
acquired
skills
and
knowledge
of
its
founders
are
shown,
since
they
are
also
attributes
the
project
needs
to
succeed.
The
exact
time
each
preme
is
required
is
not
necessarily
accurate
in
the
diagram,
but
it
represents
closely
enough
the
phase
in
the
startup
lifecycle
when
each
preme
is
most
needed.
In
a
second
diagram
shown
below,
we
represent
as
green
dots
the
ideal
level
each
preme
must
have
to
be
successful
at
a
particular
project
(or
ecosystem)
and,
in
contrast,
as
red
dots,
what
level
of
performance
it
has
really
reached.
The
distance
between
green
and
red
dots
reflects
the
gap
for
the
specific
preme,
and
therefore
a
lower
probability
of
success,
which
should
be
corrected.
'
PRE'START:'
An-cipa-on'
Time*
Biz'Model'
Death&Valley& Break*Even*
va- '
on
'
Ac- ART:
Exposure'to' Required&Level&
ST
Entrepreneurship'Theory'(Slicing'Pie,'Globaliza-on,'Adapta-on,'Appropriability,''
Valua-on,'Digital'Strategy,'…)'
Fig.
2
Preme´s
Gap
Analysis
The
attributes
shown
in
the
diagrams
are
examples
of
attributes
present
in
an
ecosystem,
representing
their
specific
conditions14.
This
should
not
necessarily
be
considered
as
a
complete,
definitive
or
exhaustive
set,
but
as
an
example
of
genome15.
By
definition,
this
list
will
vary
depending
on
the
sectors
and
specific
types
of
companies.
It
will
change
over
time
as
well,
due
to
changes
in
the
required
premes
imposed
to
the
startups
by
the
scenario
and
even
by
other
startups,
so
preme
sets
must
be
continually
revised.
Preme Categories
As
a
way
to
facilitate
comprehension
and
analysis,
and
then
build
practical
application
tools,
we
will
group
premes
depending
on
the
area
to
which
they
relate:
team,
project
or
resources.
14
Obviously,
the
set
of
attributes
will
differ
form
one
ecosystem
to
other.
15 Or “Prenome”?
1. “Designed to stay”
The
founders
must
design
their
company
to
stay
on
the
property
and
not
to
be
sold,
in
order
to
avoid
the
problem
of
lack
of
exit
ways.
This
practice
will
allow
them
to
make
wiser
decisions
throughout
the
life
of
the
company,
without
incurring
in
makeup
mistakes,
or
divert
their
focus
from
management.
2. “Focus on survival”
The
shortage
of
funding
options
and
capital
indicates
that
the
urgent
search
for
financial
breakeven
is
extremely
important
in
emerging
markets.
3. “Protected Problems"
Emerging
markets
startups
should
find
a
problem
to
address
that
allows
them
to
be
protected
from
competitors
with
greater
financing
resources,
such
as
those
from
developed
markets.
Hypothetically
it
could
be
an
authentic
native
problem
or
opportunity,
that
is
unknown
or
below
the
radar
of
startups
from
developed
countries.
The
particularities
of
those
markets
where
consumers
have
little
income
or
is
badly
distributed
force
the
startup
to
design
sophisticated
revenue
management
mechanisms
to
capture
the
willingness
to
pay
of
as
many
customers
as
possible,
wealthy
or
poor.
5. “Guerrilla Appropriability”
6. “Emerging Timing”
It
refers
to
the
launching
of
products
or
services
exactly
when
the
market
starts
demanding
massively
and
persistently
for
them
at
a
structural
level,
especially
considering
that
the
demand
at
emerging
markets
is
not
necessarily
synchronized
with
the
corresponding
one
at
developed
countries.
One
of
the
few
advantages
that
an
emerging
markets
startup
may
have
against
a
foreign
competitor
in
their
targeted
segment
is
its
deep
knowledge
about
customers.
Through
perfectly
knowing
their
characteristics,
ability
to
pay,
use
cases,
expectations
and
forms
of
interaction,
a
local
project
can
draw
definite
advantage
over
an
external
one.
8. “Guerrilla Funding”
The
essentially
less
affluent
economy
and
the
lack
of
risk
funding
forces
the
emerging
startup
to
be
really
lean
(lean
concept
taken
to
the
extreme
developing
markets
level),
so
they
can
succeed
in
surviving
and
growing
with
less
amounts
of
funding
and
lower
returns.
In
addition
and
ideally,
the
entrepreneur
should
look
for
financing
from
customers,
with
the
consequent
benefits
of
proposal
validation
and
alignment
with
the
market.
Scaling
sales
in
emerging
markets
should
be
realized
through
tactics
and
channels
following
lean
principles
and
no
others.
The
small
size
of
the
emerging
economies
forces
startups
to
grow
outside
of
their
original
countries.
This
can
be
an
immense
challenge
for
underfunded
startups,
so
the
ways
of
scaling
sales
must
be
carried
out
at
the
lowest
cost,
avoiding
own
foreign
sales
structures
at
least
at
the
beginning
and
taking
full
advantage
of
any
digital
mean.
17
Momentum:
competitive
power
accomplished
by
a
specific
player
by
taking
advantage
of
the
combined
weight
and
speed
of
an
articulated
network
of
companies
that
collaborate
to
support
its
specific
innovation.
Conclusion
The
aim
of
this
paper
was
to
present
The
Startup
Journey
Project,
a
methodology
to
improve
the
success
rate
for
startups
in
emerging
markets.
We
described
the
stages
of
the
entrepreneurial
process
on
a
graphic
representation
seeking
to
highlight
the
relevant
premes
needed
for
each
phase
and
each
scenario,
which
put
together
make
up
the
startup
genome.
We
understand
that
the
identification
of
the
specific
attributes
required
for
each
environment
represents
multiple
possible
different
genomes.
We
are
particularly
interested
in
identifying
the
common
premes
shared
by
successful
startups
in
emerging
economies,
so
we
can
use
them
as
a
benchmark
for
future
projects.
We
hope
that
our
effort
in
provoking
the
startup
community
to
pay
more
attention
to
adaptive
entrepreneurial
practices
can
improve
their
chance
of
success,
as
a
consequence
of
the
transfer
of
knowledge18.
We
seek
to
be
able
to
compare
the
genome
of
a
specific
startup
against
the
pattern
suitable
to
the
characteristics
of
emerging
economies
environments.
This
will
allow
us
to
identify
gaps
to
be
resolved,
in
the
hope
to
improve
the
chances
of
survival
of
the
startup.
If
we
apply
this
project
to
a
representative
number
of
startups
in
a
whole
ecosystem
at
the
aggregate
level,
we
will
have
contributed
to
improve
the
chances
of
success
of
the
entire
ecosystem.
Thanks
We
want
to
thank
the
invaluable
collaboration
of
Germán
Echecopar,
Tadashi
Takaoka,
Constanza
Musso,
Catalina
Romero,
Jaime
Arnaiz,
Marcelo
Diaz,
Rodrigo
Musalem,
Pablo
Gimenez,
Inti
Nunez,
Felipe
Jara,
Pablo
Fernandez,
Roberto
Musso
Azúa,
Mario
Ibáñez,
Matías
Gonzalez,
Paula
Latorre
and
many
others
who
gave
us
their
support
and
expertise.
18
The
transfer
of
adaptive
premes
in
the
entrepreneurial
ecosystem
is
equivalent
to
the
replication
of