Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Model for Concrete Creep and Shrinkage Prediction and its
Application
KOLÍNSKÝ Vojtěch1, a * and VÍTEK Jan L.2,b
1
CTU in Prague, Thákurova 7, 166 29 Praha 6, Czech Republic
2
Metrostav a.s., Koželužská 2450/4, 180 00 Praha 8, and CTU in Prague, Czech Republic
a
vojtech.kolinsky@fsv.cvut.cz, bvitek@metrostav.cz
Abstract. At the beginning of this year prof. Z. P. Bažant and his team published a new numerical
model for predicting creep and shrinkage in concrete structures. Model, named B4, is conceptually
based on the previous version B3. While early prediction models were based mostly on classical
concrete composition, the new model allows for observation the variability of modern concrete
compositions, i.e. the effects of admixtures, various aggregate types and increasing concrete
strength. The model also captures the effects of environment temperature, multi-decade prediction
and autogenous shrinkage. This is important for concretes that are produced in Czech Republic and
have higher, but not high strength (about 50 MPa). The model also allows determining internal
parameters according to experimental measurements on laboratory specimens or structural
members. Therefore it is possible to refine the prediction of the behaviour of structures made of this
concrete in the long time periods. However, the increased number of input parameters leads to a
higher complexity and it is necessary to have computational tools for practical model application.
To provide the model to wider engineering community open structure computational program (in
MATLAB environment [1]) was created. Software is freely available for download on the internet.
Description of the innovations of the model B4 and demonstration of its relatively simple
applications using newly developed software products is a subject of this paper.
Introduction
The new prediction model for concrete creep and shrinkage, named B4 [2], is the fourth in a series
of models that have been developed under the guidance of prof. Z. P. Bažant at the Northwestern
University (USA) [3,4]. It builds on the same theoretical physical background as previous model B3
[3,5]. All formulas and parameters have been revised and refined (supplemented with some new
equations) based on extensive statistical optimization of a new extensive database of laboratory
tests [6,7]. For more accurate prediction of creep for a very long load periods, the model has been
calibrated according to the results of long-term measurements on bridges worldwide [7,8]. The most
important innovations, that model B4 offers, reflect to the continuously advancing concrete
technology. Using much wider database of laboratory tests, than the previous model calibration, has
facilitated an extension of the model for calculation of autogenous and drying shrinkage and
establishment of the new relations and parameters that comprise the influence of various admixtures
and aggregate types.
All rights reserved. No part of contents of this paper may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of Trans
Tech Publications, www.ttp.net. (#74688375, Iowa State University, Ames, USA-21/02/17,18:39:03)
126 Proceedings from 22nd Czech Concrete Day 2015
(1)
As seen from the equation, the basic temperature at which no adjustment of equivalent time
occurs is 20°C. Possible temperatures ranges are during curing from 20 to 30°C (calculation of the
curing period) and after curing -25 to 75°C (calculation of other time parameters).
Autogenous Shrinkage. For normal strength concrete with a high water-cement ratio (w/c in B4
model) autogenous shrinkage is usually relatively small and can be neglected. For higher strength
concrete with low water-cement ratio and modern cements the values of autogenous shrinkage have
already become significant. Therefore in the new model B4, that is applicable up to a cylindrical
concrete strength of 70 MPa, calculation of total shrinkage is divided into the sum of autogenous
shrinkage and drying shrinkage (Eq. 2).
(2)
The size of autogenous shrinkage depends on equivalent times, water cement ratio (w/c),
aggregate cement ratio (a/c), type of cement, type of aggregate and optionally on the influence of
concrete admixtures. Detailed description of the equations and parameters is to be found in [2].
Effects of Admixtures and Aggregate Types. For various values of the content of admixtures
(or admixtures combinations) coefficients which multiply some internal parameters of the model
were empirically derived and tabulated based on laboratory tests. All admixture quantities are
entered in percentage of cement weight. Laboratory data for statistical evaluation of parameter
scaling factors were sufficient for these admixtures: retarder (Re), fly ash (Fly), superplasticizer
(Super), silica fume (Silica), air entraining agent (AEA) and water reducer (WR). When calculating
shrinkage, it is also possible to consider a combination of these admixtures: Re and Fly, Fly and
Super, Super and Silica, and when calculating creep, then a combination of Re and Fly.
For six types of aggregates (diabase, quartzite, limestone, sandstone, granite, quartzdiorit)
correction factors for shrinkage were further evaluated. The various types of aggregates are
additionally characterized by the range of their Young´s modulus and density.
Fig. 2 Graphical user interface of improved version of CDA software –– indicated calculation of
autogenous shrinkage, top left switching of material models
128 Proceedings from 22nd Czech Concrete Day 2015
Fig. 3 Comparison of experimental and calculated shrinkage curves – fibre concrete C40/50,
mixtures 1-3 – different amount of fibres
Solid State Phenomena Vol. 249 129
Fig. 4 Comparison of experimental and calculated shrinkage curves – fibre concrete C40/50, with
crystallization admixture
Fig. 5 Comparison of experimental and calculated shrinkage curves – fibre concrete C40/50, curing
effect – dry environment and storage in water
For a deeper evaluation of model relevancy it would be of course necessary to carry out an
extensive experimental and statistical analysis. However, this article is focused on a demonstration
of the new model innovations and a simple model application. Even so, the agreement between the
calculation using the shrinkage model B4 and the experiments is very high.
130 Proceedings from 22nd Czech Concrete Day 2015
Conclusion
Two software products that simplify application of the new concrete creep and shrinkage prediction
model B4 were presented. A simple comparison of shrinkage strains predicted by the B4 model and
measured data on selected concrete mixes, showed a reasonable agreement. The source codes of
both discussed programs and compiled executable versions are freely available on the author´s
website on the server of Department of Concrete and Masonry Structures, Faculty of Civil
Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague:
http://people.fsv.cvut.cz/www/kolinvoj/Veda.html.
Acknowledgment
The support from the Technological Agency of the Czech Republic, research centre CESTI (project
no. TE01020168) is gratefully acknowledged. Authors would also like to thank prof. Z. P. Bažant
for his valuable advice and recommendations during CDA software improvement, Dr. K. Kim for
providing the software original version source code and TBG Metrostav, Ltd. for providing
shrinkage experimental data.
Reference
[1] MATLAB Release 2013a, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.
[2] Bažant, Z. P., Hubler, M.H., and Wendner, R. (2015) Model B4 for Creep, Drying Shrinkage
and Autogenous Shrinkage of Normal and High-Strength Concretes with Multi-Decade
Applicability. TC-242-MDC MultiDecade Creep and Shrinkage of Concrete: Material model and
structural analysis. RILEM Materials and Structures, 47: 753-770.
[3] Bažant, Z. P. and Baweja, S. (1995). Creep and shrinkage prediction model for analysis and
design of concrete structures: Model B3. RILEM Recommendation, Materials and Structures, 28,
pp. 357–367 (Errata, 29, p. 126).
[4] Bažant, Z.P. and Panula, L. (1978). Practical prediction of time-dependent deformations of
concrete. Materials and Structures (RILEM, Paris) 11, pp. 307–316, 317–328, 415–424.
[5] Bažant, Z.P. and Baweja, S. (2000). Creep and shrinkage prediction model for analysis and
design of concrete structures: Model B3. Adam Neville Symposium: Creep and Shrinkage
Structural Design Effects, ACI SP–194, A. Al-Manaseer, ed., Am. Concrete Institute, Farmington
Hills, Michigan, 1–83.
[6] Hubler, M.H., Wendner, R., and Bažant, Z. P. (2015). Statistical Justification of Model B4 for
Drying and Autogenous Shrinkage of Concrete and Comparisons to Other Models. RILEM
Materials and Structures, 48: 797-814.
[7] Wendner, R., Hubler, M.H., and Bažant, Z. P. (2015). Statistical Justification of Model B4 for
Multi-Decade Concrete Creep and Comparisons to Other Models Using Laboratory and Bridge
Databases. RILEM Materials and Structures, 48: 815-833.
[8] Wendner, R., Hubler, M.H., and Bažant, Z. P. (2015). Optimization Method, Choice of Form
and Uncertainty Quantification of Model B4 Using Laboratory and Multi-Decade Bridge Databases.
RILEM Materials and Structures, 48: 771-796.
[9] MATLAB Compiler Runtime (MCR), http://www.mathworks.com/products/compiler/mcr/. (last
accessed Feb. 28, 2015).
[10] Kim, K.T. and Bažant, Z.P. (2014). Creep Design Aid: Open-Source Website Program for
Concrete Creep and Shrinkage Prediction, ACI Materials Journal.