Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STUDY
INTO
ENGINEERING ETHICS
IN
1. Introduction
2. Back Ground
3. Alternatives
4. Proposed Solutions
5. Recommendations
6. Executive Summary
7. Conclusions
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1- Intro to Engineering Ethics
America was being mechanized there were many disasters like bridges
leaking, oil leakage from ocean going Tanker ships. In response to these
ASCE and ASME. AIEE adopted theirs in 1912. ASCE and ASME did so
machine are procured from different companies. One such example is the
Volvo Transport vehicles which procures parts from 487 companies from
from reputed world renowned companies with good track record of quality
and research. One such part is the “Air-bags” from world top most air
(Germany), Australia and USA. The company’s top product is the vehicle
airbag used in almost all their premium 36 vehicle brands. Since 1950 it
recently it is the world largest producer of airbags with more than 25%
share of the global market. The company’s client’s are mostly Japanese
the driver and passenger seats. The airbag is the most crucial of all
surface between the vehicle's occupant and the steering wheel. During a
angle and severity of impact. Using this information, the airbag electronic
controller unit's crash algorithm determines if the crash event meets the
criteria for deployment and triggers various firing circuits to deploy one
The airbag device used in various automobile evolved from the air-filled
to the German engineer Walter Linderer, and to the North American John
W. Hetrick. Both of them registered for patents in 1951. After the patents
introduced.
1) Airbags are installed to stop the driver and other vehicle passengers
The biggest Engineering ethics case of all time is that of Volvo Company
and Takata Corporation’s which was due to defective air bags belonging
into their Car models. It’s the mandatory duty of the automotive company
to test and measure the reliability of spare parts that are included into
companies. The guilt stands less on the airbag manufacturer and more on
linked to more than eight deaths and have led to the recall of more than
40 million cars worldwide. Not only the chemical compound but the gears
which control the triggering mechanism were also found to cause the bag
to explode with too much force, spraying metal shards into the car. All of
the deaths were due to asphyxia from air bag and body penetration of
passenger lives.
activate or deactivate air bags. Child passengers are one sure reason to
3) Size: Implement smart air bag technology that deploy with a force
Alternatively this may costly but viable solution. It may need more
4) Kids safety: Implement new safety mechanisms like seat belt air bags
and resources on the government, Industry and the auto maker company.
4.PROPOSED ETHICAL ENGINEERING SOLUTION
mechanisms in all vehicles are Seat belts and airbags are the secondary
children by 45 percent. The same study found that there aren’t any
increased risks for adults who use smart airbags and the advantage over
micro controller that monitors the size and position of the occupant of the
seat using various sensors and deploys the airbag accordingly to the
collected statistics. The core need for the development of this particular
causing fatal injury than they prevent if they deploy in front of small
this by sensing how fast and how much volume the airbag will need to
passengers in the vehicle. It also identifies whether or not the seat belt is
fastened. In the case of collision, when the airbag will need to deploy, the
riding in the seat, the gentler the airbag deployment will be.
theory than in practice. These airbags are easily fooled, and they often
make mistakes. Still, having the smart airbag capability is better than
having a standard airbag in these situations, and most modern cars feature
5. RECOMMENDATIONS:
mechanisms.
government and Industry standard tests before being inducted into the
vehicle.
thoroughly and also the similar previous automotive crisis and come up with
affected volume of the crisis is worldwide and phenomenal when compared to previous
all crisis.(137 countries, 27 auto makers, 1.4 million vehicle and innumerable people)
6.2- Method
My primary research methodology was to collect and study all the reports from both
towards this crisis, the unethical engineering practices on the side of the automaker
company and that of the airbag company. Also the Senate discussion over this incident
was thoroughly read to analyze the arguments from both company sides.
6.3 – Results
My research study analysis derived two key points of unethical engineering practice 1)
Even though the airbag manufacture company Takata was a global market leader he
switched to low quality manufacturing process endangering the lives of the vehicle
passengers. 2) Volvo being a global market leader known for its safety measures was
lax in testing the vehicle components. Critical life saving parts testing’s like Airbag or
crash test should be regularly done by a third party company to assure passenger safety.
government and industry laid quality tests. Critical components which are designed to
save human life must be regularly done by a third company to assure quality control
In conclusion of the above research study into the Takata airbag crisis I
stand the engineering ethics blame entirely on the air bag manufacturer
Measurements on the crash airbag and only started third part based tests
after more than 23car owners died due to the defective airbags and their
occupants - airbags
8. REFERENCES
Air bag safety – Hearing before the Committee on Commerce, Science and
Transportation – United States Senate – Jan 9, 1997
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, USDOT Calls for National Recall of
Defective Takata Driver Side Air Bags (Nov. 18, 2014)