Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Thu Sep 16 07:53:47 EDT 2010
2
Downloaded/printed by
Renato Orlando (Biomecanica+Ind.+Com.+Prod.+Ortopédicos+Ltda) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
D1622 – 08
TABLE 2 Within-Laboratory and Between-Laboratory Relative not be rigorously applied to the acceptance or rejection of
Precision Based on Round-Robin Testing Data for D1622 – 83 material, as those data are specific to the round-robin and may
Nominal Values Expressed as Percent of the Average not be representative of other lots, conditions, materials or
Average,
Material Density,
kg/m3
kg/m3 VrA VRB VIrC VIRD laboratories. Users of this test method should apply the
principles outlined in Practice E691 to generate data specific to
M1 38 37.51 1.12 1.49 3.17 4.22
M2 50 49.63 0.60 0.93 1.70 2.53 their laboratory and materials, or between specific laboratories.
M3 24 28.03 0.50 2.35 1.42 6.65 The principles of 12.1.2-12.1.5 would then be valid for such
M4 21 20.79 2.84 5.34 8.04 15.11
data.
A
Vr is the within-laboratory coefficient of variation of the average. If Sr and SR have been calculated from a large enough body
B
VR is the between-laboratories coefficient of variation of the average.
C
VIr = 2.83 Vr. of data, and for test results that were averages (medians/other
D
VIR = 2.83 VR. function) from testing five specimens:
12.1.3 Repeatability (Ir)—Comparing two test results for
11.1.4 Density, average value, and standard deviation, and the same material, obtained by the same operator using the
11.1.5 Date of test. same equipment on the same day, the two test results should be
11.2 Unless otherwise stated, the density is assumed to be judged not equivalent if they differ by more than the Ir for that
the density calculated as defined in 10.1. material.
12.1.4 Reproducibility (IR)—Comparing two test results for
12. Precision and Bias4 the same material, obtained by different operators using differ-
12.1 Precision: ent equipment on different days, the two test results should be
12.1.1 Tables 1 and 2 are based on a round-robin conducted judged not equivalent if they differ by more than the IR value
in 1982 in accordance with Practice E691, involving four for that material.
materials tested by five laboratories. For each material, all the 12.1.5 Any judgment made in accordance with 12.1.3 and
samples were prepared at one source, but the individual 12.1.4 would have an approximate 95 % (0.95) probability of
specimens were prepared at the laboratories that tested them. being correct.
Each test result was the average of five individual determina- 12.2 The precision has not been determined for the test
tions. Each laboratory obtained one test result for each mate- method specific to spray foam materials.
rial. 12.3 Bias—Bias is systematic error that contributes to the
12.1.2 Concept of Ir and IR—Warning—The following difference between a test result and a true (or reference) value.
explanations of Ir and IR (12.1.2-12.1.5) are only intended to There are no recognized standards on which to base an estimate
present a meaningful way of considering the approximate of bias for this test method.
precision of this test method. The data in Tables 1 and 2 should
13. Keywords
4
Supporting data have been filed at ASTM International Headquarters and may 13.1 apparent core density; apparent density; apparent over-
be obtained by requesting Research Report RR:D20-1105. all density; density; rigid cellular plastics; spray foam
APPENDIX
(Nonmandatory Information)
X1. DENSITY CALCULATION USING A CORRECTION FOR THE BUOYANT EFFECT OF AIR
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Thu Sep 16 07:53:47 EDT 2010
3
Downloaded/printed by
Renato Orlando (Biomecanica+Ind.+Com.+Prod.+Ortopédicos+Ltda) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
D1622 – 08
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Committee D20 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue (D1622 - 03)
that may impact the use of this standard. (April 1, 2008)
(1) Added new 1.1 to state the purpose of the test method. (4) Corrected typos in Section 12.
(2) Revised Note 1, 4.3, and Section 7 to meet requirements of (5) Revised Average value for Material 3 in Table 1.
Guide D4968. (6) Revised Material 4 repeatability interval, Ir.
(3) Deleted “of” in 6.3.2. (7) Revised Average value for Material 3 in Table 2.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the ASTM website (www.astm.org/
COPYRIGHT/).
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Thu Sep 16 07:53:47 EDT 2010
4
Downloaded/printed by
Renato Orlando (Biomecanica+Ind.+Com.+Prod.+Ortopédicos+Ltda) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.