Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COQ
– Cost of Quality –
⇓ Introduction to COQ
⇓ What is COQ
⇓ Why Implement COQ
⇓ How to Measure COQ
⇓ Learn More About COQ
oil filters. The tag line was “Pay Me Now or Pay Me Later”. The
message was that preventive maintenance of your vehicle
could prevent more costly repairs down the road. Cost of
Quality is much the same. An organization can choose to
invest in upfront quality costs to reduce or prevent failures or
pay in the end when the defect is eventually discovered by the
customer. In too many cases organizations choose the latter.
Product failures can result in increased warranty costs and
possibly even product recalls. The impact to the bottom line
can be devastating. In addition, there are the hard to measure
costs incurred through loss of brand equity and possible
decline in future sales. Cost of Quality can have an immense
impact on a company’s bottom line, positive or negative.
https://quality-one.com/coq/ 2/6
10/20/22, 11:18 AM COQ | Cost of Quality | Quality-One
example. The name of the company has been changed but the
content represents actual events and results.
Alpha Company once measured Cost of Quality as the amount
of warranty cost versus total sales. This method only examined
the Cost of Poor Quality. This data did reveal a problem area
in the facility. It was discovered that customer part shortages
originating from one work cell were resulting in warranty costs
of over $400,000 in one year. A team was formed to
investigate and perform Root Cause Analysis (RCA) of the
shortages and a plan was developed to redesign the work cell
for an estimated cost of $60,000. With management approval,
the work cell was redesigned with a revised layout, pick bins,
dedicated locations for all the parts, process controls were
defined and implemented and several additional
improvements were made. The changes reduced tact times
and the number of operators required for the process. This
provided resources for the addition of quality technicians to
regularly audit and maintain the process on all shifts. Within
the first year of operation, shortages were reduced by 50%
equaling a $200,000 reduction in warranty costs. The project
resulted in a positive impact on the bottom line of $140,000 in
the first year. Alpha Company has since implemented
processes to measure and reduce scrap, improved process
controls and introduced new quality metrics throughout the
organization. They are now actively measuring and evaluating
both the cost of good quality and poor quality.
In the example above, the Cost of Poor Quality (CoPQ) was
having a major impact on the bottom line. Through an
investment in the Cost of Good Quality (CoGQ), Alpha
Company achieved a significant reduction in the Cost of
Quality. There are opportunities for improvement in processes
at most organizations. It has been estimated that the Cost of
Quality usually amounts to between 15-40% of business costs.
The goal of implementing Cost of Quality methodology is to
maximize product quality while minimizing cost. Cost of
Quality methodology provides the detailed information that
management needs to accurately evaluate the effectiveness of
their quality systems, identify problem areas and opportunities
for improvement.
https://quality-one.com/coq/ 5/6
10/20/22, 11:18 AM COQ | Cost of Quality | Quality-One
https://quality-one.com/coq/ 6/6