Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/353132096
CITATIONS READS
0 1,264
1 author:
Reda Abdelhakim
Helwan University
1 PUBLICATION 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Reda Abdelhakim on 09 July 2021.
Graduation Project
In
Particle size distribution of cement and concrete
Presented by
i
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................... 3
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 4
CHAPTER 2 .......................................................................................................... 8
REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 32
ii
Abstract
3
1. Introduction
Regarding the fineness and particle size distribution of the cement, the
most frequently followed parameters in the cement are 45 and 90 micron
sieve residue and Blaine (specific surface area) values. Blaine value is a
numerical value of the area covered by 1g material. It is impossible to
interpret the performance of cement with these two values. For this
reason, particle size distribution is performed with automatic devices via
distribution curves.
The grain size distribution curve for the cement needs to be 'S‗ shape.
The meaning of 'S' is that the particles are distributed homogeneously in
different dimensions within the sample. While investigating properties of
cement grain not only the size but also the shape parameter is important
because these two variables are essential to determine total surface area.
A- Strength
B- Setting Time
C- Permeability
D- Hydration Temperature
E- Water Demand
F- Microstructure
4
2. How to measure particle size distribution?
Currently, the most widely used technique for PSD determination is that
of laser light scattering. There are two variations: dynamic light
scattering (DLS) and Fraunhofer diffraction (FD) .
5
ceramics, industrial arts, and architecture due to its superior workability
The PSD of α-HH is believed to be one of the most important parameters
that control the hydration of plaster and the compressive strength
development of paste. The particle fraction has been divided into two
groups, one works with a positive effect, the other with a negative effect.
However, the effect of the PSD on the properties of α-HH paste is still
not well known. A mathematical function offers opportunities for a
direct comparison of PSD among particle systems. More useful
information can be revealed if the parameters of the function can be
related to the properties of the system. One of the widely adopted
mathematical models is the Rosin–Rammler–Bennett (RRB) distribution
function. The function can be described in two forms [1, 2]:
* + (1)
, ( )- (2)
Eq. (1) is the original form and Eq. (2) is the logarithmic form. However,
Eq. (2) cannot provide a good linear relationship at both ends of the line.
To minimize errors, Eq. (1) is taken by nonlinear least square fitting
(NLSF) to calculate the RRB parameters, De and n. R is selected as a
dependent variable for independent D. Then, the corresponding fitting is
performed until the quadratic sum of errors between the theoretic value
(R) and experimental one (Re) is minimized.
6
NLSF has obtained a significantly better fitting in cement and aerosol
system for the analysis of the PSD. The RRB function is particularly
suited for describing powders made by grinding, milling and crushing
operations. It has been used to analyze the effect of PSD on the
properties of cement, and many results and conclusions have been
provided from different perspectives.
Width (n) of α-HH on the water– hemihydrate weight ratio (W/H) for
standard consistency, hydration rate, compressive strength and
7
microstructure of paste. Such a study will contribute to the optimization
of the PSD of α-HH plaster and other cementitious materials.
The finer plasters hydrate faster while the coarser plasters hydrate more
slowly. Plasters with different n at De ≈35 μm present a slight difference
in the hydration rate. The particle fineness is also very important for the
compressive strength development. For pastes of standard consistency,
plaster with De ≈35 μm obtains the highest compressive strength with
different D e at constant (n ≈0.82). But the varying of n at constant De
(≈35 μm) results in little difference in compressive strength. The
microstructure details are in general agreement with the impact of PSD on
the hydration and the compressive strength development of paste.
8
Plaster with the optimum PSD hydrates completely without a hydration
barrier at a relatively lower W/H Then, homogeneous and well-grown DH
crystals and a more compact structure are obtained, giving a higher
compressive strength. For pastes of standard consistency, an optimum
PSD is characterized by De≈35 μm and n≈0.82. The hydration and
compressive strength development can be correlated with the RRB
parameters and the plaster with the optimum PSD could be obtained by
adjusting the parameters.
9
HH20, and OPC- α HH30 specimens at the age of 1 day were 10.43
MPa, 10.39 MPa, and 9.96 MPa, respectively, which are approximately
57–59% that of the OPC specimen (17.62 MPa). At 28 days, the
compressive strengths of the OPC- α HH10, OPC- α HH20, and OPC- α
HH30 specimens were 22.31 MPa, 18.79 MPa, and 17.81MPa,
respectively, which are approximately 44–55% that of the OPC
specimen (40.88 Mpa).
10
which used PSC, was confirmed to be most favorable for the
development of the compressive strength.
11
Jiang and Yan evaluated the influence of PSD of fly ash on the
compressive strength of cement using grey correlation analysis and a
grey model.
Zhang and Zhang analyzed the effect of PSD of slag powder on the
compressive strength of cement using grey correlation analysis. The
plaster system can also be regarded as a grey system as this relationship
is concerned. Thus, the grey model, which is successful in the analysis
for a grey system, is expected to help to explore such a relationship in
plaster.
The fractions can be roughly divided into two groups according to their
contribution to the compressive strength. One works with positive effect
the particle fractions of 0–20 μm, 20–50 μm and 90–140 μm. The other
works with negative effect: the particle fractions of 50–90 μm and 140
μm. The particle fractions of 20–50 μm, 50–90 μm and 90–140 μm are
the relatively dominant factors .The variations of the compressive
strength with the increment of specific particle fractions are in general
12
agreement with the results given by the GM models. The impact of PSD
on the compressive strength indirectly results from its action on the
hydration rate and the characteristics of pore structure. It implies that the
grey model provides a potential method to evaluate the relationship
between the PSD of α-HH and the compressive strength of plaster. But
the availability of the grey model is restricted by the W/H giving
standard consistency of α-H H paste.
13
It seems that an optimum grinding time can be established. For both the
GA and the interground blend of GA and PC this optimum seemed to be
in the region of two hours.
The fine and coarse tails of the distribution have different effects on
strength. If both ends are minimized and the distribution is made more
uniform, high strength values can be obtained. Considering water
demand and setting characteristics, some operational parameters in the
separation process can be rearranged to obtain higher strength products
14
As a suggestion; separate marketing of filter product may be more
economic rather than mixing it with separator product, when the
obtained results of this study about the effects offines are considered.
From Fig( 6) it can be seen that the compressive and flexural strengths
of each cement fraction mainly depend on its mean size Among the eight
tested fractions, the cement fractions falling into the range of 8–24 μm
( = 13.19 μ m and 8.24 μ m) have acceptable 3 days strengths
and highest 28 days strengths. It can be concluded that cement fractions
15
in the range of 8–24 l m contribute most to the properties of Portland
cement.
16
particles of different ingredients of blended cements as mentioned by
Erdogdu et al .It was found out that the interactions between the
ingredients in intergrinding is much stronger for coarser particle size
ranges since the difference between the particle size distributions of the
products of different grinding types is higher at those levels GBFS is
harder than clinker and therefore more difficult to grind.
Thus, when clinker and GBFS are interground, the finer portion of the
blended cement is mostly ground clinker whereas the coarser portion is
mostly GGBFS. This can be attributed not only to the action of the
grinding media in the mill but also to the abrasive effect of harder GBFS
particles on clinker particles.
17
Table 1. Compressive strength o f PPC and blended cement specimens
(MPa)
18
to the high cement contents associated with the mixes. For 30% GGBFS
mixes, sufficient quantities of alkalies may be liberated leading to a more
rapid hydration of the relatively small quantity of the GGBFS Varying
the PSD of the GGBFS samples by keeping the slope value (n) constant
and increasing the position parameters ( xo ) decreased the compressive
strengths of the mortar mixes.
The particle size of the cement clinker and the fly ashes decreased with
increasing grinding time. The median particle size for the cement clinker
after 2 h of grinding was 13.0 μm, and decreased to 4.0 μm after 10 h of
grinding. The median particle size for the Genesee, Lingan and
Sundance fly ashes decreased from 21.2, 14.0, and 12.4 km to 7.7, 6.7,
and 6.5 μm after 2h of grinding, and further decreased to 3.8, 3.8, and
4.1 μm, respectively after 10 h of grinding. For the fly ashes, the particle
size decreases were most significant during the first 2h of grinding. After
2 h of grinding, most of the large particles had been crushed so that all
the particles were less than 65 μm, and more than 60% of the particles
19
were less than 10 μm.. Further increase in the grinding time was less
effective in increasing the particle fineness.
The smaller particle size of fly ash with a higher surface area and glassy
phase content also improved the pozzolanic reaction Therefore, the CFA
made the blended cement paste more homogeneous and denser as well as
having a higher pozzolanic reaction than the one containing the original
fly ash, and this resulted in an increase in the compressive strength.
20
7- Particle size distribution of limestone
The compressive strengths on days 1 and 28 after casting the mortar with
the cement systems blended with 5% wt. limestone particle size (53 μ m,
25 μ m, or 3μ m) were examined (Fig. 9). The measured compressive
strength of the original cement at 1 d was 18.3 MPa and at 28 d, it was
65.0 MPa. The coefficient variance was less than 1% for all tested
systems. The ratio between the compressive strength of the blended
cement system to the strength of the original cement system (without
added limestone) is presented.
At 1d, a good correlation is clearly observed between the blended
cement‘s compressive strength and the surface area of the blend. The
highest compressive strength was observed for the blended limestone
system with the greatest surface area (CC3 μ m), while the system with
the least amount of surface area had the lowest strength (CC53 μ m).
In addition, the particle system with the greater surface area was 4%
stronger than the original cement system, despite the reduction in the
active component (i.e., clinker) in the mortar. Such improved
compressive strength at 1 day of age can be attributed to the increased
number of nucleation centers created when limestone is added to cement
The porosity of the different systems with and without limestone
replacement was measured by image analysis using TESCAN VEGA3
Control software at 1 d. 15 SEM images of each one particle-size
system, original cement, CC3 l m, CC25 l m, and C53 l m were
analyzed. The estimated porosity values measured by the image analysis
were 7.65%, 11.70%, 13.97%, and 9.16% for the CC3 l m, CC25 l m,
CC53 l m, and the original cement, respectively. Based on these results,
a greater volume of pores was displayed for blended cement with large
size limestone particles of 25 lμ m, and this was even more pronounced
21
for the 53- l m particles compared with the original cement. However,
for the fine particle blended cement (CC3 μ m), the porosity was even
lower than that of the original.
22
blended cement with large particle limestone (CC53 μm) compared with
the original cement and fewer clinker components for the fine-particle
blended cement system at the ages of 2.5 h and 1d. Indeed, the reduction
in clinker components indicates a higher degree of hydration, which
results in the greater compressive strength of the fine-limestone blended
system at the age of 1day.
Table 3. Mean particle size and surface area of the tested powders.
At day 28 after casting, the strongest mixture was the cement blend with
the limestone whose surface area was similar to that of the original
cement (CC25 μ m, Table 3). Both of the other limestone particle systems
(CC3 μm and CC53 μ m) exhibited lower strength values that were more
pronounced in the mixture with the fine limestone powder.
It is believed that such reductions in the strength values of the large and
fine limestone systems are due to the opposing mechanisms discussed
before of increased packing density for the larger particle systems with
fewer nucleation centers opposed to the many nucleation centers, but with
23
lower packing density due to agglomeration of the fine particle system. It
can be concluded that the effect of the surface area on the hydration rate
had a more significant effect on the properties of the mortar after 1 day,
as was also shown by Kumar et al. On the other hand, decreasing the
interparticle spacing and increasing the packing density had a higher
effect on the properties of the mortar after 28 days.
For instance, although using the same mixture proportions (25% cement
clinker, 36% BFS and 39% fly ash), the 3 d and 28 d compressive
strengths of the BCF cement are 19.3 MPa and 41.8 MPa, respectively,
which are increased by70.8% and 41.2% compared with those of the
reference cement. Fig. 11B demonstrates that there is no obvious
difference in flexural strength between gap-graded blended cements and
Portland cement.
24
Figure 10. Strength of mortar prisms with gap-graded blended cements
(a) Compressive strength. (b) Flexural strength.
1-Packing Density
For example, the increase in SSA from 425 to 1600 /kg led to an
improvement in packing density from 0.58 to 0.73, while a further increase
in SSA to 2200 /kg reduced the packing density to 0.62. The
incorporation of high content of SF can lead to an increase in the inter-
particles distance due to the loosening effect of fine particles .The use of
excessive fine particles can push the larger particles apart thus resulting in a
25
lower packing density and higher water demand to fill the voids between
solid particles. Yu et al. reported that the interparticle forces can become
relatively large when the particle size decreases, which can lead to a
decrease in the packing density.
2- Fluidity of cement
The n value was found by NLSF (explained before) methods. There was
a tendency that the fluidity of cement pastes increased as n value
decreased, i.e., as particle size distribution broadens. However, as there
was an influence due to other factors like the particle shape and the
surface roughness, there was some deviation within a small range.
26
3- Setting Time
The setting of cement is controlled by the formation of a network of
partially hydrated cement particles connected by hydration products
which can resist a compressive force. In the model, set is determined as
the time or degree of hydration required to frist form a percolated
pathway through the 3-D microstructure consisting of cement particles
connected to one another either by CSH gel or ettringite table 4 reports
the results obtained for the three different/c ratios and the two cement
PSDs. Both hydration time and degree of hydration are reported to
separate the effcts of hydration kinetics from microstructural
considerations. Thus, even though the finer cement requires less time to
achieve set due to its increased hydration rate, it actually requires
more hydration, as more particle-to-particle bridges need to be built to
form a percolated pathway.
27
significant (several hours for w/c=0.5 vs. about 30 min for the two
lower w/c ratios).
4- Heat Release
Thus, this is one area where the use of a coarser cement may offer a
performance benefit relative to a finer one For the w/c=0.5 cement
pastes, even after 5000 cycles of model hydration, the degree of
hydration of the coarser cement still lags far behind that of the finer
cement, 0.83 vs. 0.95. This suggests that in conventional concrete the
finer cements denitely offer a performance benefit in terms of an
enhanced degree of hydration.
28
Table 5. Porosity of Cement Pastes after 5000 Cycles of Hydration
29
about 18 % was identified for the capillary porosity phase Using the
most recent version of the NIST microstructural model.
Fig. 13 presents results for the two different cement PSDs at the three
different w/c ratios examined in this study. One can clearly see that the
cement PSD has a significant effect on the capillary porosity at which
depercolation occurs. This topic is being explored further in current
research and will be the topic of an upcoming paper .With a coarser
cement, the average interparticle spacing is larger, so that more
hydration is needed to close of the capillary porosity. Compared to the
effects of PSD, those of w/c ratio are minor. For the w/c=0.5, PSD= <
30 m> system, the model is unable to hydrate the cement sufficiently to
achieve depercolation of the capillary porosity. But, even in this case,
the percolation curve is symptotically approaching those of the two
lower w/c ratios. In a general, the percolation threshold for the < 30 m>
systems is about 18% while that for the < 5 m> systems is about 22 %.
Forthe w/c=0.5 systems, the effects of occulation/dispersion on the
capillary porosity percolation were negligible, as the data sets for the
dispersed systems(not shown) basically overlapped those shown for the
occulated ones in Fig. 13. Previously, this depercolation has been
discussed in terms of the curability" of the concrete .In a cement paste,
once the capillary porosity depercolates, the imbibition of water to
replace that lost due to chemical shrinkage during hydration slows
significantly, as transport shifts from being dominated by the capillary
pores to being controlled by the much smaller gel pores in the CSH.
Thus, the longer it takes for the capillary porosity to disconnect, the
longer one has to continue to add water to the interior of the concrete.
For example, for the w/c=0.3 cement pastes, depercolation occurs after
32 hours and 250 hours of hydration for the < 5 m> and < 30 m>
30
systems, respectively, implying an increased ―curability" for the coarser
cement systems. This change in percolation threshold could also have
major effects on diffusivity and chemical shrinkage in these systems.
Figure 13: Model results for capillary porosity percolation for cement
pastes.
31
on cementitious paste mixes produced by blending superfine cement
(SFC) with ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The particle size
distribution of cementitious paste blended with SFC was shown to be
closer to the optimal particle size distribution. The wet packing density,
flowability, rheology and strength performance of the cementitious
paste mixes were measured. Experimental results have demonstrated
improvement in properties by blending with SFC, which rendered the
particle size distribution in cementitious paste closer to the optimal.
Subject to further investigations to confirm its accuracy, the authors
advocate utilization of the proposed equation of optimal particle size
distribution for mix design optimization of cementitious paste,
including cementitious grout and he paste phase in mortar and concrete.
Further research is needed to generalize the proposed equation to aid
the mix design of mortar and concrete.
References
1) Particlesciences.com. (2019). : Particle Size Distribution and its
Measurement: Sample Preparation. [online] Available at:
https://www.particlesciences.com/news/technical-
briefs/2009/particle-size-distribution.html [Accessed 1 Jun. 2019].
2) Mehdipour, I. and Khayat, K. (2019). Effect of particle-size
distribution and specific surface area of different binder systems on
packing density and flow characteristics of cement paste.
3) Lee, B., Kim, G., Nam, J., Lee, K., Kim, G., Lee, S., Shin, K. and
Koyama, T. (2019). Influence of α-Calcium Sulfate Hemihydrate
on Setting, Compressive Strength, and Shrinkage Strain of Cement
Mortar.
4) Guan, B., Ye, Q., Wu, Z., Lou, W. and Yang, L. (2010). Analysis
of the relationship between particle size distribution of α-calcium
sulfate hemihydrate and compressive strength of set plaster—Using
grey model. Powder Technology, 200(3), pp.136-143.
5) Guan, B., Ye, Q., Wu, Z., Lou, W. and Yang, L. (2010). Analysis of
the relationship between particle size distribution of α-calcium sulfate
32
hemihydrate and compressive strength of set plaster—Using grey
model. Powder Technology, 200(3), pp.136-143.
6) Bentz, D., Garboczi, E., Haecker, C. and Jensen, O. (1999). Effects of
cement particle size distribution on performance properties of
Portland cement-based materials. Cement and Concrete Research,
29(10), pp.1663-1671.
7) Binici, H., Aksogan, O., Cagatay, I., Tokyay, M. and Emsen, E.
(2007). The effect of particle size distribution on the properties of
blended cements incorporating GGBFS and natural pozzolan
(NP). Powder Technology, 177(3), pp.140-147.
8) Bouzoubaâ, N., Zhang, M., Bilodeau, A. and Malhotra, V. (1997).
The effect of grinding on the physical properties of fly ashes and a
portland cement clinker. Cement and Concrete Research, 27(12),
pp.1861-1874.
9) Celik, I. (2009). The effects of particle size distribution and surface
area upon cement strength development. Powder Technology, 188(3),
pp.272-276.
10) Chindaprasirt, P., Jaturapitakkul, C. and Sinsiri, T. (2005). Effect of
fly ash fineness on compressive strength and pore size of blended
cement paste. Cement and Concrete Composites, 27(4), pp.425-428.
11) Felekoğlu, B., Tosun, K., Baradan, B., Altun, A. and Uyulgan, B.
(2006). The effect of fly ash and limestone fillers on the viscosity and
compressive strength of self-compacting repair mortars. Cement and
Concrete Research, 36(9), pp.1719-1726.
12) Knop, Y., Peled, A. and Cohen, R. (2014). Influences of limestone
particle size distributions and contents on blended cement
properties. Construction and Building Materials, 71, pp.26-34.
13)Lee, S., Kim, H., Sakai, E. and Daimon, M. (2003). Effect of particle
size distribution of fly ash–cement system on the fluidity of cement
pastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(5), pp.763-768.
14)Lee, S., Kim, H., Sakai, E. and Daimon, M. (2003). Effect of particle
size distribution of fly ash–cement system on the fluidity of cement
pastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(5), pp.763-768.
15) NG, P., CHEN, J. and KWAN, A. (2016). Improving Particle Size
Distribution in Cement Paste by Blending with Superfine
Cement. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering,
16(3).
33
16) Olorunsogo, F. and Wainwright, P. (1998). Effect of GGBFS
Particle-Size Distribution on Mortar Compressive Strength. Journal
of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10(3), pp.180-187.
17) Taylor, H. (2009). Cement chemistry. London: Thomas Telford Ltd.
18) Zhang, T., Yu, Q., Wei, J. and Zhang, P. (2011). A new gap-graded
particle size distribution and resulting consequences on properties of
blended cement. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(5), pp.543-
550.
19) Zhang, T., Yu, Q., Wei, J. and Zhang, P. (2011). Effects of size
fraction on composition and fundamental properties of Portland
cement. Construction and Building Materials, 25(7), pp.3038-3043.
20) Frigione, G. and Marra, S. (2019). Relationship between particle
size distribution and compressive strength in portland cement
34
35
View publication stats