You are on page 1of 1

NEWS CAR REVIEWS FEATURES THE GARAGE THE WAR ZONE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

The War Zone

F-22 Test Pilot Details The


Raptor’s Incredible Speed
A chief test pilot on both the F-117 and the F-22, James “JB” Brown III, provides a
fascinating inside look at these remarkable stealth jets.
BY THOMAS NEWDICK | PUBLISHED DEC 21, 2022 4:43 PM

THE WAR ZONE

YouTube Screencap

SHARE

THOMAS NEWDICK View Thomas Newdick's Articles

CombatAir

O ne of the world’s most accomplished test pilots, James E. Brown III, or “JB,” has
enjoyed a glittering career, which today sees him heading up the National Test Pilot
School as its president and CEO. Now, in this lecture hosted by California’s Western Museum
of Flight, JB provides his captivating insights on the world’s first two stealth tactical jets —
the F-117 Nighthawk and F-22 Raptor. Few are better to comment on what it’s actually like
to fly these aircraft, with JB having been, at different times, chief test pilot for these
programs, and having accumulated around 1,000 hours on each.

With more flight time in stealth fighters than any other pilot in the world, JB is clearly in a
unique position to speak about these aircraft, both of which come from the Lockheed stable.
At the same time, his job as a test pilot means he is best able to explain the ‘feel’ of these
jets and their impressive capabilities. His explainers on the two aircraft feature an unusual
level of detail and accessibility — the kind of presentation critical to delivering the feedback
needed to understand the jet and its systems and make them even better. Precisely the job
of a test pilot like JB.

James E. Brown III, or “JB,” when he was the lead F-22A Raptor test pilot in January 2010. Skeet Shooter/Wikimedia
Commons

First off, based on JB's description, getting the chance to strap into a Raptor cockpit for a day
can be a near-religious experience. He paints the impression of a morning sortie from
Edwards Air Force Base, California in beautiful detail: “She’s cold but very good-looking in
that bright light. Do the walkaround, crawl up into the cockpit, sit down in a cold ejection
seat, you can feel the chill soak through the flight suit. Close the canopy, get the auxiliary
power unit going. And then it’s time to start engines and you can feel these two F119
engines roar to life. It takes them about a minute to go from cold to idle RPM. You can feel
the power of the airplane, now she starts to come alive, things start to warm up, the
displays flicker on and you’re in your own little warm world, looking outside the hangar it’s
black again … So, pull out of the hangar, out of this bright light into the dark.”

“Make the way down to the taxiway to the end of the runway, the final inspection checks are
done. The crews walk around the airplane one last time, get a thumbs up. Again black, into
the dark, onto the runway. And if you look to the east, you can just see a ribbon of dawn
starting to happen … I could be going supersonic by the end of the runway if I chose.
However, now I’m just gonna get away from the ground. Get out to about 450 knots, and
then we’re maybe two-thirds of the way down a runway, stand the airplane on its tail and
I’m climbing and accelerating 70-80 degrees nose-high. Riding a veritable rocket ship. I’m in
the dark. And then all of a sudden: Boom! It’s daylight. I bathe in the bright sunlight of the
dawn and, looking outside the airplane, the rest of the world is bathed in black.”

And, if you’re flying out of Edwards on an early morning, having previously gotten up at
3:00 A.M., a full-afterburner takeoff will not only get you airborne within 1,500 feet but also
wake up everyone else on the base.

A Edwards AFB F-22 test jet going into afterburner under some amazing lighting conditions. USAF

Some interesting tidbits, starting with the F-117 portion of the lecture, include:

The stealth technology that led to the F-117 was essentially born out of a 1970s-era
study that analyzed Israeli losses in the Yom Kippur War and plotted them against a
potential Warsaw Pact invasion across the Central European Plain. The resulting air
battle would have seen NATO “out of airplanes” in just 14 days, according to this
prognosis. Surprisingly, Lockheed was not originally asked to respond to the stealth
aircraft requirement that DARPA came up with to help solve this issue.

With the A-12 and SR-71, Lockheed had actually been building aircraft with some
degree of stealth and measuring their radar signatures well before DARPA got
interested in this work. But it had always done this on the back of CIA money.
Skunk Works head honcho Ben Rich, therefore, needed CIA backing to persuade
DARPA that the company should build the Have Blue technology demonstrators
that led to the F-117. We detailed this interesting reality in a recent report.

The Nighthawk really does have a ‘stealth switch’ to go fully low observable. The
switch in question gets rid of any antennas, retracting them below the skin. As of
Operation Desert Storm, the F-117 drivers were flying the jet with no radio comms,
alone, in the dark. By the mid-1990s, work was underway on a new generation of
stealth antennas, conformal to the fuselage or wings, as found in the F-22, for
example. As for the wings of the F-117, JB shows us that the angle of wing sweep —
68.5 degrees — was literally generated by engineers folding up a piece of paper like
a paper dart. The final result was a jet that derived 60 to 70 percent of its stealth
from the shape and the rest was provided by radar absorbent material, or RAM.

The grid-like coverings protecting the F-117’s intakes incorporated windscreen


wipers. Well, wipers of a kind, anyway. The grids, which JB compares to ice-cube
trays in appearance, are designed to trap radar energy “like a Roach Motel.” But,
when flying through clouds, these grids could become genuine ice-cube trays, when
trapped moisture froze. “So, if you’re getting ice,” JB explains, “you hit the switch
and the windshield wiper scrapes the ice off of there.” Depending on the type of ice,
the pilot could also inject antifreeze into the coverings for the same effect.

There was a crazy idea to have the F-117’s cockpit filled with carbon monoxide.
Since the pilot’s head was calculated to have 200 times the radar signature of the
rest of the jet, this made sense, in that the CO atmosphere would help reduce the
internal radar signature. Happily, however, the pilots rejected this proposal.

The F-117’s radar-defeating facets partly derived from the limitations of 1970s-era
computer processing power. The available computer modeling system could be
used to assess the stealth properties of a finite number of flat surfaces far more
easily than it could a set of curved surfaces — “And that’s why the F-117 has got the
flat sides.”

Those distinctive four pitot booms poking out of the F-117’s nose, are probably the
“highest tech part” of the jet, JB contends. One boom serves each of the four flight-
control computers, for accuracy and redundancy. The tips of those probes are also
specially faceted to measure pressure differences — this meant that the jet doesn’t
need to have conventional angle-of-attack vanes or sideslip vanes sticking out from
the side and into the airstream. Apparently, the tip of the dynamic pressure port is
the only area anywhere on the jet that’s aligned to the direction in which the
airplane’s flying.

Among the hodgepodge of components and subsystems from other aircraft that
were taken over to speed the development of the F-117 was the flight control
system from the F-16. JB recounts how, when Nighthawk testers found a serious
bug in that system, an anonymous individual made a call to the disbelieving F-16
program manager and requested them to ground the Viper fleet for the problem to
be resolved.

The tailhook, used for arrested recovery during emergency landings, was buried
stealthily under the skin of the F-117. If required, it would fracture its way out of
the belly of the jet, requiring significant maintenance work to return it to flight.

As The War Zone has done in the past, JB also spends some time discussing the
different color schemes used on the F-117, including the pastel desert camouflage
and the gray scheme that was ultimately found to be the best for nocturnal flights.
Another topic we have previously explored that comes up relates to the proposed
air-to-air capability of the F-117, JB relating the tale of how it was once envisaged as
a hunter of the Soviet A-50 Mainstay radar plane.

F-117 serial number 79-10780, known as Ship One, in its pastel camouflage scheme at Groom Lake. Public Domain

Now for the F-22:

There are especially fascinating details shared about the Raptor’s speed, including
the advantages of supercruise (cruising at over the speed of sound without
afterburner). As well as being more fuel efficient and stealthier in terms of infrared
signature, the Raptor can happily cruise at Mach 1.6 or 1.7, without afterburner,
depending on the temperature at altitude. Getting faster, the F-22 is just as
impressive. While level acceleration from Mach 0.9 to 1.2 at 40,000 feet takes
around 45 seconds, the time from Mach 1.6 to 1.9 is less than half that. Noteworthy,
too, is that in full afterburner the F-22 pumps out 150 percent power (100 percent
being full dry or ‘military’ power without afterburning). At Mach 2 and 40,000 feet,
an F-22 will be at about 118 percent — “So you still got plenty left at the other end
to push it up.” The Raptor tops out at Mach 2.0 — according to the Air Force manual
— however, JB pushed one of the jets to Mach 2.1, just to prove that this was
feasible.

Hitting Mach 2 at high altitude in an F-15 is “very uncomfortable,” according to JB,


as the engines start to struggle and the controls battle with the thin atmosphere.
Meanwhile, the F-22 remains as smooth “riding in a limousine [or] like flying first
class in a 787.” No surprise, then, that JB “spent more time supersonic in the first
month of flying the F-22 than I had in my entire career up to that point.”

The high-performance attributes of the Raptor have been widely discussed, and JB
is clearly still in awe of just what the jet can do when pushed to the limits. What’s
perhaps less well-known about the F-22 is that getting it to its high-altitude perch of
60,000 feet — giving a 10,000-foot advantage over most other fighters — requires an
ensemble of special g-suit and inflatable pressure vest, as well as mask and helmet
modifications to ensure oxygen flow even if the canopy is jettisoned. In training, JB
experienced that the powerful blast of O2 from this set-up, which was designed to
ensure that oxygen got into the lungs, caused bubbles to come out of his tear ducts
— seriously uncomfortable, but at least you would stay alive. 

How about this example for all-out performance? JB recalls a test out of Edwards in
which he was not allowed to go supersonic below 30,000 feet. From brake release to
Mach 1.7 at 60,000 feet level flight still took just three minutes and 30 seconds. On
the other hand, when on the ground, the F-22 is a very different proposition: It
“kind of taxis like an old lady,” and emits a series of creaks and groans.

As to limitations, the F-22 airframe is rated between +9G to -3G. Although 9G “is not
fun and hurts,” anywhere below around 10,000 feet the F-22 can, fatigue-wise,
maintain 9G until it runs out of gas. The Raptor is not limited by angle of attack,
however, and JB recalls seeing the F-22 happily fly at an angle of attack of 110
degrees. There is also a temperature-limiting region within the flight envelope — at
the speeds and altitudes the Raptor works, the surface temperature of the jet can
reach 467 degrees Fahrenheit, sufficient to cook a pizza.

On the right, James Brown III, then a Lockheed Martin test pilot, is thanked after giving an F-22 presentation to instructors
and student pilots at Columbus Air Force Base, Mississippi. U.S. Air Force

JB also provides some interesting insight into how the F-22 would be used to
maximize its stealth advantage in aerial combat: "With stealth, we’re playing a
little bit of a cat-and-mouse game. I know where these [radar] spikes are, and I may
want to show you that I’m over here — Hey! Now, what are you doing? Turning on
your radars, turning on your missiles, and the whole time you’re doing that I’m
figuring out where you are. I turn a little bit. I’ve gone invisible, you can’t shoot me.
And you might think I want to send a little hate your way, poke out your eyes … so
it’s all a cat-and-mouse game.”

Check out the whole video for yourself below:

F-117 Nighthawk and F-22 Raptor with Jim "JB" Brown President & …
Copy link

Watch on

What parts did you find interesting? Let us know in the comments below!

Author’s note: Thanks to @MIL_STD on Twitter for bringing this video to our attention.

Contact the author: thomas@thedrive.com

Popular in the Community

KC-46 Pegasus 2023 Polestar 2 BST Ukraine Situ


Tanker Flies With … Edition 270 Review… Report: Jus

Jumpjet Taylor Muncy Jon

Having over 20k hours Having driven very few Georgia sure
in a crewed… cars with electric… how to troll th

Top Comment 9 Top Comment 3 Top Comme


AdChoices Sponsored

Conversation 129 Comments 159 Viewing

Log in Sign up

What do you think?

Sort by Newest

LR Leo Rokon
2 hours ago

I think: If the F22 is so good, why did we only build 195...while we continue to crank out the inferior F35
(nearly 1000 built so far)?

Reply · · Share

F Faruquar
9 hours ago

Something is not right with the FA-22 M0,9-M1,2 acceleration time of 45 seconds. That would make it
slower than not only F-16/FA-18E, but also the Chengdu J-7 (MIG-21 clone).

Reply · · Share

I'm Crushing it
15 hours ago

Must be a built in human glitch, terminating leading edge products that work uncontested with nothing
close to replace them with just like when the microbrewery removes the best seasonal lager they should
have made a permanent fixture.

Reply · · Share

Jim H
17 hours ago

Nice perch to watch the fireworks and the mushroom clouds.

Reply · · Share

Nemo Niemann
17 hours ago

This just shows why the F-22 should never have been cancelled by that idiot Robert Gates. It also shows
why production should have been restarted. We have too few F-22s and it will be too long before any
replacement is in the wings.

Reply · · Share

Show More Comments

Powered by Terms | Privacy | Feedback

Sign Up For Our Newsletter


Technology, performance and design delivered to your inbox.

SIGN UP

RV Rentals Privacy Policy Your California Privacy Rights Terms & Conditions Contact Us The Drive Team Manage Preferences © 2022 Recurrent Ventures. All Rights Reserved.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to


share in the revenue of any purchases made.

You might also like