08, June 2022
CRISTEL ALMEDA COMPARATIVO
HR Manager
Dear MS. COMPARATIVO:
Subject: REQUEST TO VALIDATE THE RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
We, the third year BSBA major in Human Resource Development Management
students of the University of Makati, are currently working on a research study entitled
“Factors influencing Human Resource Development Management Students from
University of Makati in Evaluating their Professors’ Performance”. The data collection
instrument for this study will be a survey questionnaire designed by the researchers.
Recognizing your experience in the field of research and education, we are humbly
asking your permission and assistance to validate the attached self-made
questionnaires to qualify for conduction before administering them to the participants of
this study.
We have attached here the validation sheet, a questionnaire with a table of
specifications, and a statement of the problem. It would also be valuable assistance to
know your suggestions and recommendations for the improvement of this instrument.
We are looking forward to our request and would merit your positive response. Your
response and contributions are highly appreciated.
Thank you and God bless.
Respectfully Yours,
Giovylyn Zabala
Researcher, Group Representative
VALIDATION SHEET
Name of Validator : Cristel Almeda Comparativo
Degree : Hotel and Restaurant Management Graduate
Position : HR Manager
No. of years in teaching : N/A
Please check the appropriate box for your ratings.
CRITERIA 5 4 3 2 1
1. Clarity and Directions of Items. The vocabulary level, language,
structure, and conceptual level of participants. The test directions and
the items are written in a clear and understandable manner. √
2. Presentation and Organization of Items. The items are
√
presented and organized in a logical manner.
3. Suitability of Items. The item appropriately presented the
substance of the research. The questions are designed to determine √
the skills that are supposed to be measured.
4. Adequateness of the Content. The number of questions per area
is representative enough of all the questions needed for the research. √
5. Attainment of Purpose. The instrument as a whole fulfills the
√
objectives needed for the research.
6. Objective. Each item question requires only one specific answer
or measures only one behavior and no aspect of the questionnaires √
suggested in the past by the researcher.
7. Scale and Evaluation Rating. The scale adapted is appropriate √
for the item.
Scale: 5 –Excellent 4 -Very Good 3-Good 2-Fair 1-Poor
REMARKS: Detailed and well- written
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
This study will be undertaken to find out “Factors Influencing Human Resource
Development Management Students in Evaluating their Professors’ Performance at
University of Makati”.
Benefiting the study are the varied sectors as follows:
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondent's term:
1.1 Age;
1.2 Gender;
1.3 Year Level
2. What are the factors that influence the Human Resource Development
Management Student from University of Makati in evaluating their professors
performance in terms of:
2.1 Reciprocity;
2.2 Authority;
2.3 Social Proof;
2.4 Commitment and Consistency;
2.5 Liking; and
2.6 Scarcity
3. Is there a significant difference in assessing the factors that influence Human
Resource Development Management students in evaluating their professors when
grouped according to profile?
4. What intervention programs can be proposed based on the assessment of
Human Resource Development Management Students from University of Makati?
Dear Respondent:
I am Giovylyn Zabala, the representative of our group and presently taking up the
Human Resource Development Management Program at the University of Makati,
conducting a research study entitled “FACTORS INFLUENCING THE HUMAN
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT STUDENTS FROM THE UNIVERSITY
OF MAKATI IN EVALUATING THEIR PROFESSORS' PERFORMANCE S.Y. 2021-
2022”. Dr. Janine Moneda-Dela Cruz, our research advisor, is overseeing the study.
In line with this, I am humbly requesting your assistance in accomplishing this
questionnaire as best and honestly as you can. We assure you that the information that
the respondents have shared will be treated confidentially. Stay safe, healthy and God
bless.
Thank you,
Giovylyn Zabala
Representative, (Group No 5. IIIB- HRDM)
PART I. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF RESPONDENTS
Directions: Kindly respond to the following questions by selecting the box which
corresponds to your answer.
A. Age:
[ ] 19 & below
[ ] 20 – 23 years old
[ ] 26 – 29 years old
[ ] 30 & above
B. Gender:
[ ] Male [ ] Female [ ] Others:__________
C. Year Level
[ ] 3rd Year College
[ ] 2nd Year College
[ ] 1st Year College
PART II: FACTORS INFLUENCING THE HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
MANAGEMENT STUDENTS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF MAKATI IN EVALUATING
THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR PROFESSORS.
DIRECTION: Kindly read each statement thoroughly. Mark on the column under
indicators that correspond to your level of agreement or disagreement with the
given statements.
SCALE DESCRIPTION
5 Strongly Agree;
4 Agree
2 Disagree;
1 Strongly Disagree
QUESTIONS 4 3 2 1
1. Reciprocity
a. Reciprocity is on my list when responding to the evaluation of
my professor.
b. Reciprocity influences my response fully.
c. By the idea of reciprocity, I catch true intention.
d. My intellect's reciprocity in evaluating is good.
e. I appreciate evaluating reciprocity for my professor's
politeness.
2. Authority 4 3 2 1
a. Authority is one reason for my response.
b. For me, observing the execution of authority is important.”
c. I do believe that balance in authority is important.
d. Authority teaches me how to correctly evaluate.
e. My freedom to choose and evaluate my professor is focused
on my authority.
3. Social Proof 4 3 2 1
a. Social Proof influences my perception.
b. By Social proof, I can clearly identify the approach intended.
c. Social Proof helps me to observe the attempted behavior.
d. Social Proof teaches me to create a natural incentive to
change my mind set to evaluate them equally.
e. Social Proof provides me with the intelligence to provide my
professors with good scores and pleasant evaluations.
4. Commitment and Consistency 4 3 2 1
a. The commitment and Consistency of the Professor have a big
impact on my response.
b. I do believe that commitment and consistency influence me
utmost.
c. By observing the commitment and consistency I can clearly
know the devotion of my professor.
d. Commitment & Consistency teaches me to have the
determination to give the professor the appropriate grade.
e. Commitment & Consistency helps me to grow my relationship
with the professor very well.
5. Liking 4 3 2 1
a. Liking barely influences me in executing my response.
b. The idea of liking helps me to respond properly.
c. Liking constantly appears in my mind when I am responding.
d. Liking develops my time to give favoritism to my professor like
he/she is kind to me.
e. Liking gives me to develop, which ultimately leads to higher
levels of trust and commitment to professor evaluation.
6. Scarcity 4 3 2 1
a. Scarcity in a different area of approach influences my
response.
b. I do believe that observing scarcity is important when
responding.
c. Identifying scarcities is one of my important aspects.
d. Scarcity gives me pressure to answer the performance
evaluation of professor
e. The scarcity provides me with an idea about the principle that
impacts the way information is evaluated.
PART III: POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS/PROGRAMS.
DIRECTION: Kindly read each statement thoroughly. Mark on the column under
indicators that correspond to your level of agreement or disagreement with the
given statements.
SCALE DESCRIPTION
5 Strongly Agree;
4 Agree
2 Disagree;
1 Strongly Disagree
QUESTIONS 4 3 2 1
1. Blog with pre-orientation video.
a. This could be beneficial as it increases my analytical thinking
and level of understanding in general.
b. A more precise and comprehensive blog is way more effective
for me.
c. I do believe that this will serve as a linkage of information
sources as well as to faculty members.
2. Life Workshop 4 3 2 1
a. It could be beneficial in the sense that I can have the
opportunity to reflect on one's story which could raise my
awareness when evaluating my professors’ performance.
b. I prefer this due to the fact that from professors’ perspectives,
this could provide them insight into their students’ lives so that
they act on the information that their students share in an
intentional manner. It’s a win-win situation.
c. I believe that this can give me a safe place as I can be able to
share how I am doing, what I am thinking about, and how I am
feeling.
3. Webinar 4 3 2 1
a. It is useful to interpret the information directly.
b. I prefer webinars because they have an immediate interaction.
c. I do believe that it is convenient and less accountable for
engagement.
