Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://apesportal.eva.mpg.de/status/topic/status/population_dynamics
2.
Retrieved from
http://www.saps.org.uk/secondary/teaching-resources/258-
ecology-exercise-1-measuring-abundance-and-random-sampling
3.
http://www.countrysideinfo.co.uk/3howto.htm
DISCUSSION
Based on the data that was obtained from our observation, by using the given
formula in the lab manual, it was able to calculate the percentage composition
of the species that we found in the quadrat including with the frequency.
ALL QUADRAT
SPECIES PERCENTAGE COVER (100%) DENSITY (INDIVIDUALS/M2) FREQUENCY
A 8.33 15.30 0.58
B 3.67 21.30 0.50
C 72.30 184.00 1.00
D 0.43 2.00 0.17
E 4.30 31.30 0.17
F 0.67 3.00 0.17
G 0.33 0.30 0.08
H 1.00 3.33 0.17
I 0.33 1.53 0.08
J 2.33 2.33 0.08
K 0.67 0.67 0.08
L 0.33 7.67 0.08
M 0.67 9.33 0.08
N 0.67 15.00 0.08
Based on our results shown in this table, species C recorded 72.30% in
percentage cover, making species C has the highest percentage cover
compared to other species. However, species G, I and L recorded 0.33% in
the percentage cover, were sharing the same number and making it the lowest
percentage cover among other species. As for calculating the number of
individuals per total species, species C has the highest number of relative
density, 184.00. However, species G recorded 0.30 for relative density, making
the species G has the lowest number of relative density.
In this experiment, a few errors can occur by using this quadrat sampling. If
quadrats are too large or too small or didn’t do it right, it will causes errors in
the results. For instance, bigger species require bigger plots. Due to under-
delegated population size, random seperated quadrats that are too small can
lose an excess number of individuals.