Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Reliability
•A keen sense of involvement is a prerequisite for the journey because, like any
journey of import, the company will sometimes find itself in uncharted territory.
•In this chapter we look at some of the quality management practices that enable a
company to achieve its goals.
•With an ever-watchful eye on the satisfaction of the customer, the entire work force
embarks on an intensive study of product design and process design.
•Total quality management revolves around three main themes: the customer, the
process, the people.
•In TQM model, at its core are the company vision and mission and management
commitment.
•They bind the customer, the process, and the people into an integrated whole.
•A company`s vision is quite simple what the company want to be.
•The mission lay out the company strategic focus.
•Management commitment is another core to succeed in implementing TQM.
•Satisfying customer needs and expectations is a major theme in TQM – in fact, it is
the driving force. Without satisfied customer, market share will not grow, and revenue
will not increase.
•A key principle in quality programs is that customers are both internal and external.
•Barriers restrict the flow of information. For instant, if marketing fails to talk to
product design, a key input on customer needs will not be incorporated into the
product.
• management must work with its human resources staff to empower people to break
down interdepartmental barriers.
67,000 DPMO
cost = 25% of
sales 3.4 DPMO
3-14
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT(QFD)
•Quality function deployment is planning tool that focuses on designing quality into a
product or service by incorporating customer needs.
•It is a systems approach that involves cross-functional teams(whose members are not
necessarily from product design) that looks at the complete cycle of product
development.
•QFD is customer driven and translates customer needs into appropriate technical
requirements in products and services.
•It evaluates competitors from two perspectives- the customer`s perspective and a
technical perspective.
• QFD reduces the product development cycle time in each functional area- from
product inception and definition to production and sales.
•Companies use QFD to create training programs, select new employee, establish
supplier development criteria, and improve services.
•The practice of identifying best practices in industry and thereby setting goals to
emulate them is known as Benchmarking.
•Companies cannot stagnate; this guarantees a loss of market share to the
competition.
•Continuous improvement is a mandate for survival, and such fast –paced
improvement is facilitated by benchmarking.
•Specific steps for benchmarking vary from company to company, but the
fundamental approach is the same.
•One company`s benchmarking may not work for other company because other
operating concerns.
•A primary advantage of the benchmarking practice is that it promotes a thorough
understanding of the company`s own processes- the company`s current profile is well
understood.
•Intensive studies of existing practices often lead to identification of non-value added
activities and plans for process improvement.
• Personal Behavior
• Objectivity
• Product definition
•Mutual understanding
• Quality evaluation
• Product quality
BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus
CONTINUE…
• Corrective action
• Technical aid
• Integrity
• Rewards
•Propriety information
•Safeguarding reputation.
Performance
basic operating characteristics of a product; how well a
car is handled or its gas mileage
Features
“extra” items added to basic features, such as a stereo
CD or a leather interior in a car
Reliability
probability that a product will operate properly within an
expected time frame; that is, a TV will work without repair
for about seven years
Conformance
degree to which a product meets pre–established
standards
Durability
how long product lasts before replacement
Serviceability
ease of getting repairs, speed of repairs, courtesy and
competence of repair person
28
Pareto Analysis
NUMBER OF
CAUSE DEFECTS PERCENTAGE
Poor design 80 64 %
Wrong part dimensions 16 13
Defective parts 12 10
Incorrect machine calibration 7 6
Operator errors 4 3
Defective material 3 2
Surface abrasions 3 2
125 100 %
29
70
(64)
60 Pareto Chart
Percent from each cause 50
40
30
20
(13)
(10)
10 (6)
(3) (2) (2)
0
Operation Operation
Decision Start/
Finish
31
Check Sheet
COMPONENTS REPLACED BY LAB
TIME PERIOD: 22 Feb to 27 Feb 2002
REPAIR TECHNICIAN: Bob
32
Histogram
20
15
10
0
1 2 6 13 10 16 19 17 12 16 2017 13 5 6 2 1
33
Scatter Diagram
Y
X
3-34
Control Chart
24
UCL = 23.35
21
Number of defects
18 c = 12.67
15
12
6
LCL = 1.99
3
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Sample number
3-35
Cause-and-Effect Diagram
Measurement Human Machines
Faulty
testing equipment Poor supervision Out of adjustment
Quality
Inaccurate Problem
temperature
control Defective from vendor Poor process design
Ineffective quality
Not to specifications management
Dust and Dirt Material- Deficiencies
handling problems in product design
3-36