Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- o0o -
City of Caloocan
SANGGUNIANG PANLUNGSOD
-COMPLAINANT-
SPAC 0012-0722-011
PB NICANOR P. REPOLLO,
0F BRGY 154, DISTRICT1, CALOOCAN CITY
-RESPONDENT -,
ORDER
This case was called for a Preliminary Conference last October 3, 2022.
Complainant Ricardo Garcia the Action Officer of DPSTM South Caloocan City
swore on his complaint affidavit that he filed a complaint against the officials of
Sangguniang Barangay 154 headed by its Punong Barangay Nicanor P. Repollo
when they allowed the operation of a Parking Space rental along the sidewalks
of barangay 154. As proof, Complainant submitted evidences attached in the
complaint affidavit such as pictures of the wall with corresponding names and
plate numbers of vehicles parked, acknowledgement receipt for payment signed
by the treasurer of Barangay 154. A sample signed MOA between Barangay 154
and individual who agreed to park their vehicles. Complainant prays for a proper
investigation and the filing of appropriate charges against the concerned officials
On the part of Respondents, Pb Nicanor D. Repollo submitted and swore on
his submitted ANSWER to this body, he reasoned out that the Parking space was
not only decided by him but a by-product of a Barangay Peoples assembly which
was concretely realized when the Sangguniang Barangay 154 pass Sangguniang
Barangay Resolution Blng.152-022-22. He also avers that the monetary
considerations are not payments but merely donations by individuals who avails
of the parking space. Respondent alleged that the complaint of MR Ricardo Garcia
be dismissed for being malicious and fabricated lies. Respondents PB Nicanor P.
Repollo and the whole council firmly believes that the creation of the said Parking
space does not run counter to the existing ordinances of the city regarding the
mandate of the Barangay to ensure orderliness, cleanliness and to ensure the free
flow of traffic.
In the light of the foregoing, the Committee finds that the complaint
is sufficient in form and substance and therefore decided to acquire
jurisdiction on the case based on the circumstances and grounds
enumerated herein and guided by the provisions of Section 60-68 of RA
7160.
The formal investigation of the case will now proceed given that
the ninety (90) days election ban on administrative investigation is already
lifted.