Qra For Grade Five Isito Level 2022 2023

Form 3A Grade Level Profile
School
Instruction: Entry to this form shall be generated from Form 2A.
M
ENROLMENT
SECTION SY 2020-2021 O VS
(90-100) (85-89)
M F T M F T M F
GRADE 1 - ANTIPUESTO 0 0
GRADE 1 - DE GUZMAN 0 0
GRADE 1-DOLIENTE 0 0
GRADE 1 - GARCIA 0 0
GRADE 1-OPALLA 0 0
GRADE 1 - OYAO 0 0
GRADE 1 - REPDOS 0 0
GRADE 1- DINOPOL 0 0
GRADE 1 -PURACAN 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENTAGE #DIV/0! ### ### ### ###
111 93 10 7 34 40
0 0
QUARTERLY REPO
ANALYSIS OF GRADES 1 TO 3 LEARNERS' PRO
Revised to confo
School PAJO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
MTB FILIPINO
VS S FS DME O VS
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
51 38 16 8 0 0 7 6 31 32
0 0 0
ARTERLY REPORT ON ASSESSMENT
3 LEARNERS' PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT REPORT PER GRADE
Revised to conform with the New Normal
Grade GRADE 1 School Year
FILIPINO ENGLISH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
55 46 18 9 0 0 5 4 17 21 66
0 0
GRADE
School Year 2022-2023
ENGLISH MATH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
57 23 11 0 0 9 6 30 26 54 55
0 0
0 0
MATH AP
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION (per Learning Area per Gr
18 6 0 0 8 7 32 30 58 49
Based on the data gathered, mostly of the Grade 1 leaners got
33.45% got an average of 85-89 Very Satisfactory, 11.27% FS
ESP got an Oustandating rating, and mostly of the leaners difficult in ENGLISH s
Prepared and Submitted by: ANNA MARIE M. DE
GRADE LEVEL L
Note: To be prepared by the Grade Level Leader for subm

0 0
AP MAPEH
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
(per Learning Area per Grade leve 0 0
13 7 0 0 7 5 47 42 44 42 13
of the Grade 1 leaners got an average grade between 80-84 Satisfactory,
y Satisfactory, 11.27% FS( 75-79) and 5.22% got an outstanding grade (90-100).
the leaners difficult in ENGLISH subject which is 71 of the learners got an average grade of 75-79.
ANNA MARIE M. DE GUZMAN Reviewed & Validated by:
GRADE LEVEL LEADER
ade Level Leader for submission to the School Testing coordinator / School Head
0 0
ESP
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
4 0 0 11 13 43 41 48 35 9 4
& Validated by: CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ PAZ G. TECSON
SCHOOL TESTING COORDINATOR / SCHOOL HEAD

SCIENCE
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
MUSIC
DME O VS S FS
(BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ### ### #DIV/0!
0
ARTS
FS DME O VS S
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0
RTS P.E
FS DME O VS S
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### #DIV/0! ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### #DIV/0!
0
P.E
S FS DME O VS
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
T M F T M F T M F T M F
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### #DIV/0! ### ### #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
HEALTH
VS S FS DME
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75)
T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0
School
MT
ENROLMENT
(90-100) (85-89)
M F T M F T M F
GRADE 2 - BAGUIO 0 0
GRADE 2- HABERLE 0 0
GRADE 2 - LAGUNA 0 0
GRADE 2 -MANCHING 0 0
GRADE 2 -QUILAQUIL 0 0
GRADE 2 - RETIZA 0 0
GRADE 2 -SANTIAGO 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENTAGE ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
QUARTERLY REPO
Revised to conf
MTB FILIPINO
VS S FS DME O VS
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
UARTERLY REPORT ON ASSESSMENT
FILIPINO ENGLISH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0
GRADE
ENGLISH MATH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
0 0 0
ANALYSIS AND INTE
Based on the data ga
28.96% got an averag
ESP got the highest rating
Prepared and Submit

MATH AP
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION (per Learning Area per Grade level)
Based on the data gathered, mostly of the Grade 2 leaners got an average grade between 80-84 , which is about 41.
28.96% got an average of 85-89 Very Satisfactory, 11.47% Fair Satisfactory( 75-79) and 18.15% got an outstanding
ESP got the highest rating and the learner attained mastery of this subject, and mostly of the leaners difficult in ENGLISH subject.
Prepared and Submitted by: GLENDA M. SANTIAGO
GRADE LEVEL LEADER
Note: To be prepared by the Grade Level Leader for submission to the School Testing coordinator / School Hea
AP MAPEH
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
80-84 , which is about 41.42% Satisfactory,
18.15% got an outstanding grade (90-100).
GLISH subject.
Reviewed & Validated by: CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ PAZ G. TECSON
g coordinator / School Head

ESP
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
G. TECSON
OR / SCHOOL HEAD
SCIENCE
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
MUSIC
DME O VS S FS
(BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
M F T M F T M F T M F T M
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ###
0
ARTS
FS DME O VS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ARTS
S FS DME O
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100)
M F T M F T M F T M F
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
P.E
O VS S FS DME
(90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75)
T M F T M F T M F T M
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
HEALTH
DME O VS S FS
(BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
F T M F T M F T M F T M
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
FS DME
(75-79) (BELOW 75)
F T M F T
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
School
M
ENROLMENT
(90-100) (85-89)
M F T M F T M F
0 0
P. FERNANDEZ
0 0
M. CRUZ
0 0
P. CUACA
0 0
R. CUIZON
0 0
F. AFANES
0 0
M. INOC
0 0
M. SUDARIA
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENTAGE #DIV/0! ### ### ### ###

145 141 12 13 40 39
QUARTERLY REPO
Revised to confo
MTB FILIPINO
VS S FS DME O VS
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0
66 71 27 18 0 0 12 15 42 36
0 0 0
ARTERLY REPORT ON ASSESSMENT
FILIPINO ENGLISH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0
63 73 28 17 0 0 15 14 32 36 70
0 0 0
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION (per Learning Area p
Based on the data gathered, mostly of the Grade 3 leaner
26.03% got an average of 85-89 Very Satisfactory, 14.24
ESP got an Oustandating rating, and mostly of the leaners lack of master
Prepared and Submitted by: MARICEL

GRADE LE
Note: To be prepared by the Grade Level Leader fo

GRADE
ENGLISH MATH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
75 28 16 0 0 11 12 31 33 75 72
0 0
ATION (per Learning Area per Grade level)
ostly of the Grade 3 leaners got an average grade between 80-84 , which is about 45.49% Satisfactory,
9 Very Satisfactory, 14.24% lack of Mastery or FS( 75-79) and 9.18% got an outstanding grade (90-100).
ostly of the leaners lack of mastery in MATH subject which is 51 of the learners got an average grade of 75-79.
MARICEL R. SUDARIA Reviewed & Validated by:

GRADE LEVEL LEADER SCHOOL TESTING COORD
the Grade Level Leader for submission to the School Testing coordinator / School Head
MATH AP
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0
28 24 0 0 15 13 39
40 66 74
0 0
sfactory,
e (90-100).
wed & Validated by: CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ PAZ G. TECSON

HOOL TESTING COORDINATOR / SCHOOL HEAD
AP MAPEH
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0
25 14 0 0 15 14 43 42 69 75 18
0 0
ESP
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0
10 0 0 19 21 39 59 71 55 16 6
0 0
SCIENCE
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0
0 0 14 11 28 48 79 65 24 17
0 0
MUSIC
DME O VS S FS
(BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ###

0
0 0
ARTS
FS DME O VS S
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TS P.E
FS DME O VS S
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
P.E HEALTH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HEALTH
S FS DME
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75)
F T M F T M F T
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Form 3B Grade Level Profile
School
Instruction: Entry to this form shall be generated from Form 2B.
FILIPI
ENROLMENT
(90-100) (85-89)
M F T M F T M F
ARCE 0 0 0
AYING 0 0
BACANG 0 0
FLORES 0 0
PAGOBO 0 0
SARSALEJO 0 0
SECRETARIA 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENTAGE ### ### ### ### ###

QUARTERLY REP
ANALYSIS OF GRADES 4 TO 6 LEARNERS' PR
Revised to con
FILIPINO ENGLISH
VS S FS DME O VS
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
Grade FOUR School Year
ENGLISH MATH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
GRADE
MATH SCIENCE
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
0 0
SCIENCE AP
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###

Based on the grades of the learners, majority of the learners ob
Prepared and Submitted by: LEAH BACA
GRADE LEVEL L

AP EPP / TLE
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
(per Learning Area per Grade level)

majority of the learners obtain 80-84 grades. The majority of the grades of the learners grouped together in Satisfactory a
LEAH BACANG Reviewed & Validated by:
GRADE LEVEL LEADER
E MAPEH
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
together in Satisfactory and Very Satifactory.

225 26 32 38 50 34 11 4
0 0
ESP
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
DME
(BELOW 75)
M F T
0 0 0
### ### ###

School
FILIPI
ENROLMENT
(90-100) (85-89)
M F T M F T M F
ANINO 0 0 0
DABALOS 21 19 40 1 1 2 10 15
FERRER 0 0
GALAURA 0 0
ISITO 22 19 41 0 0 0 4 5
PEREZ 0 0
YSOLA 18 21 39 0 0 0 2 13
TOTAL 61 59 120 1 1 2 16 33
PERCENTAGE 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.56

QUARTERLY REP
Revised to con
FILIPINO ENGLISH
VS S FS DME O VS
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
0 0 0 0 0 0
25 10 3 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 19
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
9 17 14 31 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 8
0 0 0 0 0 0
15 17 9 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
49 44 26 70 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 20 31
0.41 0.72 0.44 0.58 0.02 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.18 0.34 0.26

Grade FIVE School Year
ENGLISH MATH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
14 7 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 11 12 23 8
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
15 15 30 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 7 7
0 0 0 0 0
15 17 32 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 12 12 24 7
44 39 83 6 0 6 0 0 0 2 1 3 26 28 54 22
0.72 0.66 0.69 0.1 0 0.05 0 0 0 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.43 0.47 0.45 0.36
62 58
GRADE
MATH SCIENCE
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
7 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 10 5 15 9 12
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
14 21 12 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 8 15 15
0 0 0 0 0
7 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 17 18
28 50 12 1 13 0 0 0 2 2 4 15 12 27 41 45
0.47 0.42 0.2 0.02 0.11 0 0 0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.25 0.2 0.23 0.67 0.76
61 59
SCIENCE AP
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0
21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 19 34 6 0 6
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
30 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 12 17 10 27
0 0 0 0 0 0
35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 16 17 33
86 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 32 51 39 27 66
0.72 0.05 0 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.31 0.54 0.43 0.64 0.46 0.55

GRADE LEVEL L

AP EPP / TLE
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 7 10 17 13 8 21 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 10 13 18 9 27 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 11 13 9 10 19 5
3 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 4 12 31 43 40 27 67 5
0.05 0 0.03 0 0 0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.2 0.53 0.36 0.66 0.46 0.56 0.08

GRADE LEVEL LEADER
E MAPEH
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 19 18 37 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 15 20 17 4 21 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 20 35 3 1 4 0 0
1 6 0 0 0 2 1 3 39 53 92 20 5 25 0 0
0.02 0.05 0 0 0 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.64 0.9 0.77 0.33 0.08 0.21 0 0

ESP
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 3 5 19 16 35 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 1 3 4 12 16 16 6 22 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 3 4 16 18 34 1 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 5 7 12 39 46 85 17 6 23 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.08 0.12 0.1 0.64 0.78 0.71 0.28 0.1 0.19 0 0 0

DME
(BELOW 75)
M F T
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
School
FILIPI
ENROLMENT
(90-100) (85-89)
M F T M F T M F
AMARILLO 0 0 0
BENTULAN 0 0
GEQUILLO 0 0
OLMEDO 0 0
PAME 0 0
TANEO 0 0
0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENTAGE ### ### ### ### ###

QUARTERLY REP
Revised to con
FILIPINO ENGLISH
VS S FS DME O VS
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
Grade FIVE School Year
ENGLISH MATH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
GRADE
MATH SCIENCE
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
0 0
0 0
SCIENCE AP
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###

GRADE LEVEL L

AP EPP / TLE
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###

GRADE LEVEL LEADER
E MAPEH
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###

225 26 32 38 50 34 11 4
0 0
ESP
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###
DME
(BELOW 75)
M F T
0 0 0
### ### ###

Form 2 School Profile
CONSOLIDATED ANALYSIS OF KINDERGARTEN PROGRESS REPORT

SCHOOL
ENROLMENT SY 2022-2023 HEALTH, WELL-B

TEACHER/SECTION BEGINNING
M F T M F T
KINDER-ELIOT
KINDER-JUMAO-AS
KINDER-PATALINJUG
KINDER-TENEBROSO
KINDER-UNDALOC
TOTAL
PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The table shows that there are learners in the Beginning performance task rating need intervention and ass
On the other hand,the learners in the Developing level performance rating continuously in doing task with m
repared and Submitted by:
Kindergarten School Coordinator
GRESS REPORT
PAJO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DOMAIN 1
HEALTH, WELL-BEING AND MOTOR DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPING CONSISTENT
M F T M F T
ng need intervention and assessing the quality of interaction and able to reach the Developing and Consistent level of dev
tinuously in doing task with minimal supervision while the Consistent level of performance is the quality of an observation
Reviewed by
FIRST QU
DOMAIN 2
SOCIOEMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
BEGINNING DEVELOPING CONSISTENT
M F T M F T M F
and Consistent level of development for the First Quarter S.Y.2021-2022.

quality of an observation based on a manual or behaviours and responses.
Reviewed by: PAZ G.TECSON
School Principal
FIRST QUARTER REPORT ON ASSESSMENT
LEVEL KINDERGARTEN
DOMAIN 3
LANGUAGE, LITERACY AND COMMUNICATION
CONSISTENT BEGINNING DEVELOPING
T M F T M F T
ERGARTEN SCHOOL YEAR
3 DOMAIN 4
D COMMUNICATION MATHEMATICS
CONSISTENT BEGINNING DEVELOPING
M F T M F T M
Noted by:
Public Sc
2022-2023
DOMAIN 4
MATHEMATICS UNDERSTANDING THE PHYS
DEVELOPING CONSISTENT BEGINNING
F T M F T M F T
Public Schools District Supervisor
DOMAIN 5
ERSTANDING THE PHYSICAL AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
DEVELOPING CONSISTENT
M F T M F T
MT
ENROLMENT
GRADE LEVEL SY 2020-2021 O VS
(90-100) (85-89)
M F T M F T M F
GRADE 1
GRADE 2
GRADE 3
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GRADE 1 110 88 7 5 33 37
GRADE 2 147 116 22 26 47 34
GRADE 3 140 140 11 10 40 40

QUARTERLY REP
CONSOLIDATED ANALYSIS OF GRADES 1 TO 3 LEARN
Revised to con
MTB FILIPINO
VS S FS DME O VS
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 40 15 6 0 0 5 1 31 33
51 40 27 16 0 0 22 25 40 35
60 70 29 20 12 13 33 40
ES 1 TO 3 LEARNERS' PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT REPORT PER GRADE
SCHOOL School Year 2021
FILIPINO ENGLISH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
58 49 16 5 0 0 3 2 15 19 66
56 39 29 17 0 0 22 27 42 32 49
68 68 27 19 14 11 33 39 64
ORT PER GRADE
2021
ENGLISH MATH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
56 26 11 0 0 6 2 27 31 55 50
40 34 17 0 0 25 19 43 39 55 44
72 29 18 10 12 30 35 71 71
ANALYSIS AND INTE

Based on the data ga
ESP got an Oustandating ra
Prepared and Submitted by:

MATH AP
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 5
7 4 35 36 54 43
24 14 0 0
18 31 18 24 58 46
29 22
15 11 36 51 64 66
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION (per Learning Area per Grade level)

Based on the data gathered, mostly of the Grade1- 3 leaners got an average grade between 80-84 .
ESP got an Oustandating rating, and mostly of the leaners lack of mastery in MATH subject and English.
pared and Submitted by: CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ PAZ G. TECSON
Note: To be prepared by the School Testing Coordinator / School Head for submission to the Cluster Head/ PS
AP MAPEH
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 5 6 5 39 37 50 40 15
23 15 21 26 43 36 62 44 21
25 12 16 12 34 41 71 79 19
en 80-84 .
Reviewed & Validated by:
HEAD CLUSTER HEAD / PSDS / DISTRICT TESTING COORDI
on to the Cluster Head/ PSDS/ District Testing Coordinator

ESP
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 7 10 44 44 52 31 7 3
10 0 0 34 35 44 36 57 36 12 9
8 18 17 43 55 64 61 15 7
TRICT TESTING COORDINATOR
SCIENCE
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
15 11 29 47 73 65 23 17
MUSIC
DME O VS S FS
(BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ARTS
DME O VS S FS
(BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P.E
DME O VS S FS
(BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HEALTH
FS DME O VS S
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
F T M F T M F T M F T M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HEALTH
S FS DME
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75)
F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Form 5 District Profile
Instruction: Entry to this form shall be generated from Form 4.
MT
ENROLMENT
SCHOOL SY 2020-2021 O VS
(90-100) (85-89)
M F T M F T M F
PAJO ES 417 373 787 27 26 53 116 97
TOTAL 417 373 787 27 26 53 116 97
PERCENTAGE 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.28 0.26

QUARTERLY REP
CONSOLIDATED ANALYSIS OF LEARNERS' PR
Revised to con
Division LAPU-LAPU CITY District III
MTB FILIPINO
VS S FS DME O VS
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
213 172 193 365 85 46 131 0 0 0 27 26 53 88 64 152
213 172 193 365 85 46 131 0 0 0 27 26 53 88 64 152
0.27 0.41 0.52 0.46 0.2 0.12 0.17 0 0 0 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.21 0.17 0.19
OF LEARNERS' PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT REPORT PER GRADE
III Grade GRADE 1-3 School Year
FILIPINO ENGLISH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
113 123 236 50 31 81 0 0 0 30 25 55 77 64 141 120
113 123 236 50 31 81 0 0 0 30 25 55 77 64 141 120
0.27 0.33 0.3 0.12 0.08 0.1 0 0 0 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.29
GRADE
ENGLISH MATH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
126 246 51 29 80 0 0 0 30 22 52 94 87 181 184 174
126 246 51 29 80 0 0 0 30 22 52 94 87 181 184 174
0.34 0.31 0.12 0.08 0.1 0 0 0 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.44 0.47
MATH AP
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
358 75 59 134 0 0 0 27 29 56 101 86 187 204 207 411
358 75 59 134 0 0 0 27 29 56 101 86 187 204 207 411
0.45 0.18 0.16 0.17 0 0 0 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.24 0.23 0.24 0.49 0.55 0.52
Based on the data gathered, mostly of the Grade1- 3 leaners go
ESP got an Oustandating rating, and mostly of the leaners lack of mastery in MA
Prepared and Submitted by:
PSDS / CLUSTE
Note: To be prepared by the PSDS / Cluster Head for sub

AP MAPEH
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
68 38 106 0 0 0 28 24 52 109 100 209 216 209 425 47
68 38 106 0 0 0 28 24 52 109 100 209 216 209 425 47
0.16 0.1 0.13 0 0 0 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.52 0.56 0.54 0.11
of the Grade1- 3 leaners got an average grade between 80-84 .
the leaners lack of mastery in MATH subject and English.

PSDS / CLUSTER HEAD
SDS / Cluster Head for submission to the Division Office (Division Testing Coordinator)
ESP
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
28 75 0 0 0 46 40 86 112 128 240 187 157 344 41 20
28 75 0 0 0 46 40 86 112 128 240 187 157 344 41 20
0.08 0.1 0 0 0 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.27 0.34 0.3 0.45 0.42 0.44 0.1 0.05
SCIENCE
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
61 0 0 0 14 11 25 35 51 86 84 76 160 26 18 44
61 0 0 0 14 11 25 35 51 86 84 76 160 26 18 44
0.08 0 0 0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.08 0.14 0.11 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.06 0.05 0.06
MUSIC
DME O VS S FS
(BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
MUSIC
FS DME O
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100)
T M F T M F
ARTS
O VS S
0-100) (85-89) (80-84)
T M F T M F
ARTS
S FS DME
80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75)
T M F T M F
DME O VS
LOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
T M F T M F
P.E
VS S FS
85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
T M F T M F
FS DME O
75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100)
T M F T M F
HEALTH
O VS S
0-100) (85-89) (80-84)
T M F T M F
EALTH
S FS DME
80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75)
T M F T M F
DME
LOW 75)
T
FILIPI
ENROLMENT
GRADE LEVEL SY 2020-2021 O VS
(90-100) (85-89)
M F T M F T M F
GRADE 4
GRADE 5
GRADE 6
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
QUARTERLY REP
CONSOLIDATED ANALYSIS OF GRADES 4 TO 6 LEARN
Revised to con
FILIPINO ENGLISH
VS S FS DME O VS
(85-89) (80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ES 4 TO 6 LEARNERS' PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT REPORT PER GRADE
SCHOOL School Year 2022-2023
ENGLISH MATH
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ORT PER GRADE
2022-2023
MATH SCIENCE
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SCIENCE AP
S FS DME O VS S
(80-84) (75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Based on the grades of the learners from Grade 4-6, majority of

The learners attained the highest mastery in ESP subject and needs more maste
Based on the data, 12.85 % of the learners are Outstanding, 30.89% Very Satisfa
Prepared and Submitted by: CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ P
SCHOOL TESTING COORDINA
Note: To be prepared by the School Testing Coordinator /

AP EPP / TLE
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
rom Grade 4-6, majority of the learners obtain 80-84 grades. The majority of the grades of the learners grouped together i
SP subject and needs more mastery in Filipino and Science Subjects
Outstanding, 30.89% Very Satisfactory, 38.77% Satisfactory and 17.48 .% Fair Satisfactory.
CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ PAZ G. TECSON Reviewed & Validated by:
OOL TESTING COORDINATOR / SCHOOL HEAD
chool Testing Coordinator / School Head for submission to the Cluster Head/ PSDS/ District Testing Coordinator
E MAPEH
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
earners grouped together in Satisfactory and Very Satifactory.

& Validated by:
CLUSTER HEAD / PSDS / DISTRICT TESTING COORDINATOR
ting Coordinator
ESP
FS DME O VS S FS
(75-79) (BELOW 75) (90-100) (85-89) (80-84) (75-79)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DME
(BELOW 75)
M F T
0 0 0
K Form 3 District Profile
DIVISION
Instruction: Entry to this form shall be generated from Form 2.
ENROLMENT SY
SCHOOL 2021`-2022
M F
PAJO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 161 151
PUSOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

TOTAL 161 151
PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Prepared and Submitted by: RENATO L.
PSDS / CLUS
Note: To be prepared by PSDS / Cluster Head for submission to the Division Office
FOU
CONSOLIDATE
LAPU-LAPU CITY DISTRICT THREE
DOMAIN 1
HEALTH, WELL-BEING AND MOTOR DEVELOPMENT SOCIOEMO
ROLMENT SY
2021`-2022
BEGINNING DEVELOPING CONSISTENT BEGINNING
312 36 30 66 108 111 219 17 10 27 27 29

312 36 30 66 269 262 531 17 10 27 27 29
0.224 0.199 0.212 1.671 1.735 1.702 0.106 0.066 0.087 0.168 0.192
RENATO L. PAQUIBOT
PSDS / CLUSTER HEAD

FOURTH QUARTER REPORT ON ASSESSMENT
CONSOLIDATED ANALYSIS OF KINDERGARTEN PROGRESS REPORT
THREE LEVEL KINDERGARTEN
DOMAIN 2 DOMAIN 3
SOCIOEMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT LANGUAGE, LITERACY AND COMMU
BEGINNING DEVELOPING CONSISTENT BEGINNING DEVELOPING
56 99 100 199 35 22 57 65 53 118 86 83

56 260 251 511 35 22 57 65 53 118 247 234
0.179 1.615 1.662 1.638 0.217 0.146 0.183 0.404 0.351 0.378 1.534 1.55
PORT
KINDERGARTEN SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022
DOMAIN 3 DOMAIN 4
ACY AND COMMUNICATION MATHEMATICS
EVELOPING CONSISTENT BEGINNING DEVELOPING CONSISTENT
169 10 15 25 69 53 122 81 85 166 11 13

481 10 15 25 69 53 122 242 236 478 11 13
1.542 0.062 0.099 0.08 0.429 0.351 0.391 1.503 1.563 1.532 0.068 0.086
DOMAIN 5
UNDERSTANDING THE PHYSICAL AND NATURAL
ENVIRONMENT
ONSISTENT BEGINNING DEVELOPING CONSISTENT
T M F T M F T M F T
24 47 43 90 104 93 197 10 15 25
24 47 43 90 265 244 509 10 15 25
0.077 0.292 0.285 0.288 1.646 1.616 1.631 0.062 0.099 0.08

Qra For Grade Five Isito Level 2022 2023

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Qra For Grade Five Isito Level 2022 2023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Form 3A Grade Level Profile

Instruction: Entry to this form shall be generated from Form 2A.

PERCENTAGE #DIV/0! ### ### ### ###

School PAJO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Grade GRADE 1 School Year

School Year 2022-2023

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION (per Learning Area per Gr

Based on the data gathered, mostly of the Grade 1 leaners got

33.45% got an average of 85-89 Very Satisfactory, 11.27% FS

Prepared and Submitted by: ANNA MARIE M. DE

Note: To be prepared by the Grade Level Leader for subm

(per Learning Area per Grade leve 0 0

of the Grade 1 leaners got an average grade between 80-84 Satisfactory,

ANNA MARIE M. DE GUZMAN Reviewed & Validated by:

GRADE LEVEL LEADER

& Validated by: CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ PAZ G. TECSON

SCHOOL TESTING COORDINATOR / SCHOOL HEAD

Instruction: Entry to this form shall be generated from Form 2A.

PERCENTAGE ### ### ### ### ###

School PAJO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Grade GRADE 2 School Year

School Year 2022-2023

ANALYSIS AND INTE

Based on the data ga

28.96% got an averag

ESP got the highest rating

Prepared and Submit

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION (per Learning Area per Grade level)

Prepared and Submitted by: GLENDA M. SANTIAGO

GRADE LEVEL LEADER

80-84 , which is about 41.42% Satisfactory,

18.15% got an outstanding grade (90-100).

Reviewed & Validated by: CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ PAZ G. TECSON

SCHOOL TESTING COORDINATOR / SCHOOL HEAD

g coordinator / School Head

### ### ###

Instruction: Entry to this form shall be generated from Form 2A.

PERCENTAGE #DIV/0! ### ### ### ###

School PAJO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Grade GRADE 3 School Year

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION (per Learning Area p

Based on the data gathered, mostly of the Grade 3 leaner

26.03% got an average of 85-89 Very Satisfactory, 14.24

Prepared and Submitted by: MARICEL

Note: To be prepared by the Grade Level Leader fo

School Year 2022-2023

ATION (per Learning Area per Grade level)

MARICEL R. SUDARIA Reviewed & Validated by:

wed & Validated by: CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ PAZ G. TECSON

### ### ###

Instruction: Entry to this form shall be generated from Form 2B.

PERCENTAGE ### ### ### ### ###

School PAJO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Grade FOUR School Year

School Year 2022-2023

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION (per Learning Area per Gr

Prepared and Submitted by: LEAH BACA

Note: To be prepared by the Grade Level Leader for subm

(per Learning Area per Grade level)

LEAH BACANG Reviewed & Validated by:

GRADE LEVEL LEADER

& Validated by: CHERYL P. OLMEDO/ PAZ G. TECSON