Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MODULE 5
WHY DO WE DOCUMENT?
It is necessary for:
1. Communication between health care providers
2. Meeting legislative requirements (reimbursements)
3. Quality improvement (auditing health agencies)
4. Research
5. Legal proof of healthcare provided (legal proof)
6. Education
7. Planning client care
8. Health care analysis
QUALITY DOCUMENTATION
The elements of the nursing process are evident in our documentation.
Indicators:
1. Reflects the application of the nursing process.
2. Plan of care – client’s needs, circumstances, preferences, values, abilities &
culture, & supports the client self-management of care.
3. Implementation of intervention.
4. Evaluation & modification of care plan.
5. Critical inquiry – critical thinking & clinical judgement skills
6. Consultations & referrals
B. MORAL BLINDNESS
A morally blind nurse (or health professional) is someone who, upon
encountering a moral problem, simply does not see it as a moral problem.
Instead, they may perceive it as either clinical or a technical problem.
Health professionals (including nurses) are sometimes so conditioned by the
‘CLINICAL IMAGERY’ (context) around them that, when they do encounter
a bona fide moral problem, it tends to be perceived not as a moral problem,
but as a clinical or a technical problem, and, as such, one requiring a clinical
solution, not a moral solution.
Some health professionals have a healthy perception of the alternating
moral-clinical images depicted by a given scenario; others, however, remain
stuck with a dominant clinical image and do not see the alternative moral
image, which for them is less discernible.
The best way to achieve a moral shift in perception is by appropriate ethics
education and reflective ethical practice.
C. MORAL INDIFFERENCE AND INSENSITIVITY
MORAL INDIFFERENCE is characterized by an unconcerned or
uninterested attitude towards demands to be moral; in short, it assumes the
attitude of ‘Why bother to be moral?’
MORAL INSENSITIVITY is the failure to respond to the suffering of others,
in refusing to understand others, and in ‘the causal turning away of one’s
ethical gaze’ — in other words, assuming the stance of a morally passive
bystander.
Examples:
1. A nurse is unconcerned about and uninterested in alleviating a patient’s
pain.
2. A nurse is unconcerned about and uninterested in any form of violation
of patient’s rights.
3. Nurses who are ‘conformist’ in their practice and feel hindered by
‘dominance within the medical profession, a stressful work environment,
insufficient resources, time and workload pressures’.
D. AMORALISM
Amoralism is an absence of moral concern and a rejection of morality
altogether.
An AMORAL PERSON is someone who refrains from making moral
judgments and who typically rejects being bound by any morality’s
behavioral prescriptions and proscriptions.
The only recourse in dealing with the amoral health professional would be to
appeal to non-moral censuring mechanisms such as legal and/or
professional disciplinary measures.
Examples:
1. An amoral nurse rejects that he or she has a moral duty to uphold a
patient’s rights.
2. An amoral nurse claims that it does not make any sense even to speak
of things like a patient’s rights since moral language itself has no
meaning.
E. IMMORALISM
Immoral conduct (also termed unethical conduct) is any act involving a
deliberate violation of accepted or agreed ethical standards.
Immoralism can encompass both MORAL TURPITUDE and MORAL
DELINQUENCY.
MORAL TURPITUDE is anything done knowingly contrary to justice,
honesty, principle, or good morals … [or] an act of baseness, vileness or
depravity in the private or social duties which a man owes to his fellow man
or to society in general. The term implies something immoral in itself.
MORAL DELINQUENCY refers to any act involving moral negligence or a
dereliction of moral duty.
Examples:
1. The deliberate theft of patients’ and/or clients’ money for personal use
2. The sexual, verbal and physical abuse of patients/clients
3. Xenophobic behaviors (including racism, sexism, ageism, homophobia
and a range of other unjust discriminatory behaviors)
4. Participation in unscrupulous research practices
5. A nurse who knowingly and recklessly breaches a patient’s
confidentiality could have committed an unethical act even if the breach
in question did not result in any significant moral harm to the patient.
F. MORAL COMPLACENCY
A general unwillingness to accept that one’s moral opinions may be
mistaken.
Can be remedied by moral education, moral consciousness raising and
reflective practice in an ethical environment that has organizational support.
G. MORAL FANATICISM
The moral fanatic is someone who is thoroughly wedded to certain ideals
and uncritically and unreflectingly makes moral judgments according to them.
Examples:
1. The maintenance of absolute confidentiality, even though harm might be
caused as a result.
2. A doctor or a nurse forcing unwanted information on a patient in the
fanatical belief that all patients ‘must be told the truth’ – even if the
patient in question has specifically requested not to receive the
information, and the imposition of the unwanted information on the
patient can be shown to be a ‘gratuitous and harmful representation of
the moral foundations for respect for autonomy’.
H. MORAL DISAGREEMENTS AND CONFLICTS
Two fundamental types of Moral Disagreement:
1. Internal Moral Disagreement
2. Radical Moral Disagreement
THREE FORMS OF INTERNAL MORAL DISAGREEMENT:
1. Involves a fundamental conflict about the force or priority of accepted
moral standards. » DISAGREEMENT IN ATTITUDE. Example: Nurse A
might favor (pro-attitude) telling the truth to patient X about a pessimistic
medical diagnosis and prognosis. Nurse B, on the other hand, might not
favor (con-attitude) telling the truth to patient X about this diagnosis and
prognosis, and prefer a con-attitude to avoid unnecessary suffering.
2. Centers on what are to count as acceptable exceptions and limitations to
otherwise mutually agreed moral standards. » DISAGREEMENT IN
INTERPRETATION. Example: Two nurses agree that patients’ rights
should not be violated. Nurse A, in situations involving violations of
patients’ rights, a nurse should act – even if this means threatening the
nurse’s job security. Nurse B agrees that nurses should in principle act
to prevent a patient’s rights from being violated, but disagree that nurses
should do so if they stand to lose their jobs as a result. What these
nurses are essentially disagreeing about is not the moral standard per
se, but about when morally relevant considerations can be and cannot
be overridden by self-interest.
3. Centers on the selection and applicability of accepted ethical standards
» DISAGREEMENT ON THE MORAL RELEVANCE. Example: Two
nurses may agree that killing an innocent human being is wrong. They
may disagree, however, that abortion is wrong. Nurse A argues that
since the fetus is not a human being, abortion does not entail the killing
of an innocent human being and therefore is not wrong. Nurse B argues
that the fetus is a human being, and therefore abortion, since it entails
killing an innocent human being, is absolutely morally wrong.
TWO TYPES OF RADICAL MORAL DISAGREEMENT:
1. PARTIAL RADICAL MORAL DISAGREEMENT dissenting parties might
agree on some criteria of relevance but not all. Example on Partial
Radical Moral Disagreement:
‒ A nurse might argue that directly killing terminally and chronically ill
patients with a lethal injection is morally wrong, whereas merely
letting nature take its course or letting patients die is not morally
wrong.
‒ Another nurse might agree that directly killing terminally and
chronically ill patients is wrong, but thoroughly disagree that merely
letting patients die is less morally offensive.
2. TOTAL RADICAL MORAL DISAGREEMENT disputants do not agree
on any criteria of relevance, and do not share any basic moral principles.
I. MORAL DILEMMAS
What is a DILEMMA? A situation requiring choice between what seem to be
two equally desirable or undesirable alternatives; it may also be described as
an awful feeling of being stuck.
What then is a moral dilemma? It can occur in the form of logical
incompatibility between two different moral principles (e.g. respect for the
sanctity of life vs. non-maleficence). It involves competing moral duties and
entails competing and conflicting interests.
EXAMPLE ON ‘COMPETING MORAL DUTIES’
1. A nurse working in a specialized unit is assigned a patient with a known
history of drug addiction, and is instructed to chaperone the patient
when there are visitors to make sure that illicit drugs are not ‘slipped in’.
The nurse, however, believes that the duty to protect this patient from
harm (such as might occur from receiving illicit drugs) competes with the
duty to respect the patient’s privacy. The question for the nurse in this
scenario is: Which duty should I fulfill?
EXAMPLE ON ‘COMPETING AND CONFLICTING INTERESTS’
1. A clinical teacher on clinical placement at a residential care home was
informed by a student that an elderly demented resident had been
physically and verbally abused by one of the ward’s permanent staff
members, as witnessed by the student. The clinical teacher was
temporarily undecided about what to do. It was a very serious matter –
and, indeed, a very serious accusation – but it would be difficult to prove.
If the incident was not reported to the home’s nursing administrator, the
staff member concerned would probably continue to abuse the home’s
residents. If the incident was reported, there was a risk that the interests
of both students and the school of nursing could be undermined (The
home’s administrator might, for example, refuse to continue allowing
students to be placed at the home for the purposes of gaining clinical
experience).
J. ‘MORAL DISTRESS’
INITIAL MORAL DISTRESS is characterized by feelings of frustration, anger,
anxiety and guilt when faced with perceived institutional obstacles and
interpersonal conflict about values, and
REACTIVE MORAL DISTRESS (also called moral residue) occurs when an
individual fails to act on their initial moral distress and is left with ‘residue’ or
lingering distress.
Three (3) root cause of moral distress in nursing:
1. CLINICAL SITUATIONS (e.g. controversial end-of-life decisions;
inadequate informed consent; working with incompetent practitioners);
2. INTERNAL CONSTRAINTS (e.g. nurses’ lack of moral competencies;
perceived lack of autonomy and powerlessness to act; lack of
knowledge and understanding of the full situation); and
3. EXTERNAL CONSTRAINTS (e.g. hierarchies within the health care
system; inadequate communication among team members; hospital
policies and priorities that conflict with patient care needs)
CONSEQUENCES:
1. threat to the integrity of nurses and the quality of care
2. nurse job dissatisfaction
3. burnout
4. untimely abandoning of their positions and even their profession
altogether
WHAT IS CONSCIENCE?
The practical judgment that determines that an act is good, therefore to be done,
and evil, therefore to be avoided.
Etymologically » Latin: con and science = WITH KNOWLEDGE
An act of conscience is therefore an act that has basis on some knowledge.
1. RIGHT CONSCIENCE is the judgment of a person who—on the basis of
true principles—decides, in conformity with the truth, that a particular action
is licit or illicit.
2. ERRONEOUS CONSCIENCE is the judgment of a person who—on the
basis of false principles that are thought to be true—mistakenly determines
that a particular action is licit or illicit.
3. CERTAIN CONSCIENCE is the judgment about the goodness or evil of a
particular action that is made without fear of being mistaken. This type of
conscience must always be followed.
4. DOUBTFUL CONSCIENCE Is the suspension of judgment on the moral
goodness or evil of an action because the intellect cannot see clearly
whether it is good or bad. A doubtful conscience cannot be followed if it
entails the possibility of doing something bad; the doubt must be resolved
first.
5. SCRUPULOUS CONSCIENCE decides that an action is sinful based on
weak or insufficient reasons. The symptoms of a scrupulous conscience are:
‒ an excessive anxiety over the sufficiency of good actions and, especially,
over the validity of past confessions,
‒ fastidious scrutinizing of unnecessary circumstances, especially as
regards internal sins (thoughts, desires),
‒ obstinacy in one’s opinion, which leads to mistrust one’s confessor and
to go from one confessor to another.
6. LAX CONSCIENCE judges without sufficient reason that a certain action is
not, or is only slightly, sinful.
FORMATION OF CONSCIENCE
Diligently learning the laws of the moral life (through spiritual formation), just as
the referee must be interested in knowing well the rules of the game;
Seeking expert advice in difficult cases (spiritual direction), just as doctors hold
consultations when the diagnosis of a serious illness is not clear;
Asking God for light (prayer);
Removing the obstacles to right judgment, such as habitual moral disorder, or
bad habits (ascetical struggle); and
Personal examination of conscience