You are on page 1of 2

Group Rating Form

Group REPORTING: 6
Group Evaluator: 9

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. THE COMMITTEE REPORTING ON THE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT WILL BE GRADED AS A GROUP.

2. THE FOUR REMAINING COMMITTEE WILL RATE THE COMMITTEE BASED ON THE CRITERIA BELOW.

THE RATING WILL BE: 5 – HIGHEST ; 1 – LOWEST

3. THE SUM OF ALL THE RATING WILL BE THE TOTAL POINTS FOR FINAL EXAM (120 PTS).

Name of Evaluator: Crisostomo, Arlyquin Members Name and Rating

CRITERIA Dandan Marquez Mabilangan Go

Speech was clear with appropriate volume and inflection 5 5 5 5

Safety Inspection Results was reported in a convincing 4 4 4 4


and consistent manner

Arguments and viewpoints expressed fit the report 4 4 4 4

Visual aids are effectively used 5 5 5 5

Reporters were well prepared and organized 5 5 5 5

Captured and maintained audience interest 5 5 5 5

Total 28 28 28 28

Name of Evaluator: Rodolfo A. Torres III Members Name and Rating

CRITERIA Dandan Marquez Mabilangan Go

Speech was clear with appropriate volume and inflection 5 5 5 5

Safety Inspection Results was reported in a convincing 5 5 5 5


and consistent manner

Arguments and viewpoints expressed fit the report 5 5 5 5


Visual aids are effectively used 5 5 5 5

Reporters were well prepared and organized 5 5 5 5

Captured and maintained audience interest 5 5 5 5

Total 30 30 30 30

Name of Evaluator: Enriquez, Andrei John R. Members Name and Rating

CRITERIA Dandan Marquez Mabilangan Go

Speech was clear with appropriate volume and inflection 5 5 5 5

Safety Inspection Results was reported in a convincing 5 5 5 5


and consistent manner

Arguments and viewpoints expressed fit the report 5 5 5 5

Visual aids are effectively used 5 5 5 5

Reporters were well prepared and organized 5 5 5 5

Captured and maintained audience interest 4 4 4 4

Total

Name of Evaluator:______________________ Average Rating

Reporter

You might also like