Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Content:
Intro to Bloodletting
3700 BCE
1500 B.C
5th century B.C
709 C.E
Medieval to Middle Ages 500-1500 AD
15th-16th Century
Continuing through the Middle Ages
17th Century
18th Century
19th Century
End of 19th century into the 20th century
Present
Bloodletting
A very popular medical practice spanning over 2,000 years from ancient times to the
late 19th century.
Blood was riddled with mystery. With people believing in astrology, life forces,
impurities, and spirits, letting blood out from the body was thought to release the
bad and achieve balance.
There are some modern applications still used today.
3700 BCE
Bloodletting dates as far back as to
the ancient civilization of
Mesopotamia.
1550 BC
Evidence of bloodletting in Ancient Egypt
can be found in the Ebers Papyrus, one of
their ancient medical texts.
15th-16th Century
Bloodletting was used extensively during The Great Plague (Black Death--
throughout the Middle Ages) to cure those affected. The blood drained from the
afflicted was described as "foul-smelling, blackish, and was often accompanied by
greenish pus."
Continuing through the Middle Ages
Barber-surgeons were popular for not only hair maintenance but also for
bloodletting and other medical and dentistry practices. This continued throughout
the 18th century.
17th century
Late 16th century and throughout the 17th century, the invention of microscope
began to change the way people looked at disease.
However, finding cures were still puzzling to physicians; therefore, they believed it
better to continue letting blood than do nothing at all.
18th century
Leeches
Advancement of knowledge in human anatomy and physiology, looking at
physiological chemistry, and cellular physiology were increasing diagnostics and
surgery.
Evidence-based medicine led to the discredited and rapid decline of the practice of
bloodletting as it was deemed ineffective in the late 19th century.
"Louis Pasteur (1822–1895) and Robert Koch (1843–1910) proved conclusively that
inflammation resulted from infection and thus was not susceptible to bloodletting. They
offered a scientifically legitimate way of thinking about the cause and treatment of the
patient’s illness (Kerridge & Lowe, 1995)."