PES UNIVERSITY

(Established Under Karnataka Act No. 16 of 2013)

100ft Ring Road, BSK III Stg,
Bengaluru -560085
B. Com Program

UM21BC243A – CORPORATE ACCOUNTING

RESERCH BASED ASSIGNMENT

TOPIC : Changing Perception and Transforming Outcomes :

L&T’s Acquisition of Mindtree.
________________________________

Submitted by:
Student Name: Stephen A
SRN: PES3UG21BC184
Program: B.com
Class & Section: 3rd Semester, “D” Section
Institution: PES University.

Submitted to:
Dr. Lakshmi HS
FOCM
PES university
RR Campus.
 Table of Contents

Sl. No. Contents of the Presentation Page no.

1. Abstract 03
2. Introduction 04
3. Objective 05
4. Literature Review 05 - 06
5. Research Methodology 06
6. Discussion & Result 06 - 12
7. Findings & Suggestions 13
8. Conclusions 13 - 14
9. Reference 14
Abstract:
The recent purchase of Mindtree Ltd. by the corporate multinational juggernaut Larsen &
Toubro is something that this research paper attempts to comprehend and analyse (L&T). In
March 2019, Mindtree Ltd., one of India's top and fastest-growing InfoTech firms, was the
target of a hostile takeover proposal from L&T InfoTech (LTI), the L&T group's information
technology (IT) business unit. The case goes on to analyse the deal and explains why the deal
became heated and what caused it. In order to comprehend the idea of hostile takeovers, the
case study's goal is likewise the conditions for business that favour acquisitions. In the second
section of the article, the company's anti-takeover strategies that it uses to thwart the takeover
effort are the main topic. Immediately following L&T's offer, Mindtree decided to buy back
shares has been investigated. There has been research on two viewpoints. two perspectives
are presented here—one from the standpoint of Mindtree's promoters and the other from that
of investors. Previously, there The promoters of Mindtree and LTI1 had a few extremely
amusing and intriguing verbal exchanges throughout the takeover period, which emphasised
the importance of the human factor in acquisitions. To comprehend the nature and conditions
of the agreement, an analysis of the business environment and the industry has been done.
The legalities of the acquisition and abuse by a dominating player have also been looked at
LTI's position on the purchase was quite clear. It was purely a commercial transaction for
them. They were headed in the direction of rapid expansion, which they would be helped to
succeed through Mindtree. a few industries Retail, consumer packaged goods, media, and
technology are among the underachieved industries for LTI, a market where Mindtree has a
strong presence. Mindtree would assist LTI in discovering previously undiscovered
geographic areas in Europe. This takeover attempt, however, turned into a sensitive matter for
the Mindtree promoters. V. G. Siddharth, one of Mindtree's nonexecutive directors,
approached LTI and presented his 21% ownership stake in the company as the beginning of it
all. LTI grabbed this offer and went on to announce that it would acquire a total of about 60
per cent in the company, which made the other highly unpleasant for promoters. Some
Mindtree proponents opposed it strongly, and there were some hurried declarations moreover,
media reports were made also. This intriguing exchange between the two businesses attracted
a lot of attention to the investors were left perplexed by the deal. The primary goal of the case
is to examine and impart knowledge about the many business activities and strategic choices
made throughout the relationship between the two organisations. This example would cover
the teaching goals for the concepts of hostile takeovers, share buybacks as a novel
antitakeover defence, political, legal, and economic analyses pertinent to corporate
restructuring choices, and hubris and managerialism. An On corporate business
communication, a different teaching vantage point has also been investigated. acquiring
Mindtree, a top information technology and research company in India & development
services providers, made past year, a number of days' worth of news for different for a variety
of factors, but most significantly because in the field of IT, India's first hostile takeover.
When it first became a company, Mindtree was as of 1999, Mindtree Consulting Private
Limited according to ten Indian IT experts bringing their concepts to life. After a steady
Having seen success in listing its shares,
Keywords: Mindtree, L&T InfoTech, acquisition, share buyback, Information Technology,
L&T Infotech’s Acquisition of Mindtree-Much ado about nothing!
Introduction:
On March 18, 2019, V. G. Siddhartha (Siddhartha) and his associated entities, CoffeeDay
buying and selling limited and espresso Day establishments restricted, entered into a
proportion buy settlement (SPA) to buy a 20.32 percent stake in Mindtree, a worldwide
statistics technology (IT) and era consulting employer. L&T constrained is India's leading
technology, engineering, creation, and manufacturing conglomerate (L&TPress launch,
2019). The largest person investor in Mindtree turned into Siddhartha. At a cost of 980 per
share [1], or around INR 32.Sixty nine billion, L&T supposed to shop for this interest. L&T
filed an order with its broking Axis Capital for the on-market acquisition of up to fifteen% of
the percentage capital of Mindtree as soon as the public declaration become made, with a rate
cap of INR 980 in step with share (Laskar, 2019). Because of the SPA's implementation, this
market as in keeping with the Securities and exchange Board of India (SEBI) takeover laws,
when a proportion purchase order from the secondary market is placed, an open offer to all
owners is made. L&T made a proposal to all Mindtree's public shareholders to shop for as
much as a further 31% of the enterprise's brilliant shares for INR 980 in step with proportion
(Prasad,2019). If all went in accordance to plan, L&T might own two-thirds of the shares
inside the IT services provider. The advocates of Mindtree strongly rejected the rumoured
L&T acquisition offer and criticised it, emphasising the negative outcomes it might have on
the employer's way of life, consumer connections, and worker morale. As of March 2019,
promoters and promoter institution owned 13.32% of the full stocks (ET Bureau, 2019a).
While Mindtree proponents made the sort of public protest, L&T left out the objections of the
takeover and made an effort to appease the stakeholders by using defending the motion as a
collectively beneficial association (PrasadandMendonca,2019). Many questions afflicted
Krishna Kumar Natarajan, Chairman Mindtree, and the employer's management as they tried
to determine out the way to forestall L&T's acquisition try. Turned into it viable to save you
L&T from gaining manage despite the promoters handiest proudly owning thirteen.32% of
the organisation? Need to the co-founders of Mindtree keep working for the business they
founded twenty years in the past or go away if L&T's concept to take over the employer is a
hit? If the Mindtree co-founders continued to be towards L&T, L&T confronted a totally
distinct state of affairs. After a fairly publicised merger and acquisition (M&A) among
Larsen & Toubro (L&T) and Mindtree, Yuvraj Mehta, head of company logo control &
Communications (CBMC) at L&T, learned of negative media narratives approximately L&T.
L&T changed into accused of "antagonistic takeover" and "destruction of Mindtree's
subculture," amongst different matters. Mehta needed to paintings with all parties involved,
exchange the narrative from adversarial takeover to continuity, improvement, and
profitability, and integrate Mindtree and its human beings into L&T. The Mindtree
acquisition became the finest (in terms of price) in L&T's history as compared to previous
strategic efforts, which had been generally natural and smaller in advance acquisitions. It was
also the maximum hard because to Mindtree promoters' adamant competition to the
acquisition, which required L&T to buy a great quantity of shares in an open provide. While
L&T, a outstanding player in engineering and construction, announced plans to buy most
people of stocks in Mindtree, a startup IT employer, media rumours about the deal got
underway in January 2019. The information quickly changed into combative media raving.
Time turned into of the essence. Mehta become aware that he could want to start planning his
approach right now. What have to he do subsequent? What have to he do first? Seeing that
June 2018, there were media rumours that some PE investors are in preliminary discussions
with the Mindtree founders for a bite of the controlling interest within the business. All round
Unconfirmed reviews had been additionally made at the identical time. One of the initial
traders in V.G. Siddhartha Mindtree is considering selling a proportion of the stake that he
and his affiliated agencies own then, at this point, Mindtree's promoters emerged. To not
want to give up manipulate, and as a end result have been hesitant to take part in any sales of
their interest. L&T is one of the prospective customers. And a organization that has been
powerful in thwarting however in advance acquisition efforts, the prevailing bidder others,
which include those in the vehement opposition from Mindtree's proponents.

Objective:
This Reserch paper based on the information collected from MindTree’s business and Larsen
& Toubro (L&T) strategies in Information Technology industry sector. This research paper
deals with the following aim and objectives.
1. To learn the operation level and business level strategies of L&T’s acquiring of Mindtree.
2. To know the growth saga of Larsen & Toubro (L&T) by acquiring MindTree and
expanded globally at high speed.
3. To learn about Larsen & Toubro (L&T) strategy of facing the challenges using their
innovative slogan.
4. To know about History of Larsen & Toubro (L&T).
5. To Reasons for the Acquisition.
6. To know about Challenges being faced by L&T on post-acquisition or in future.

Literature Review:
Isbanah and Salsabilla (2020) Profitability provides a summary of an organization's potential
to generate advantages and serves as a consideration while deciding on a profit plan.
According to Rafaizan et al. (2020), Arumbarkahh and Peluu (2019), investors may get false
signals about the capital market as a result of declining dividends. Negin and Al and others
(2019) demonstrate that the measure of profits distributed relies on benefits realised by taking
into benefits of organisation conjecture. Decisions on profit distribution must also consider its
development and stamina. Ehrhardt and Brigham (2017) Profitability was a result that was
attained based on tactics, decisions, and statistics indicating the viability of an organization's
activities, which Moreover, the combined impact of liquidity, board resources, and duty on
operational results. Considering Pontohh, 2015; Fitri et al., 2016 Profit appropriation is a
warning indicator for the theory that opportunities of the firm, making massive cash infusions
necessary to develop advantages that will have an impact increasing the range of advantages
that may be expressed as profits. The ROI is used in this inquiry as a measure of ratio of
productivity. Sudiartha and Prastuti (2016) Utilize the company's ability to allocate earnings
the value of the organisation Dividend strategy is a decision made in relation to the earnings
that an individual or company has the business. Usually, the decision is between allocating
the benefit to investors or holding it as profit for future reference. The association between
profits paid at net gain is known as the profit payout ratio (DPR). Sastrawan (2016)
Profitability is a key indicator of an organization's financial health, and as an example
perspective while evaluating the company. Prabulana-et-al., (2017), Manager;
Muhammadinah and Jamill (2015) Accepting the decrease in profit instalments was not well
received by investors. Widati and Farisa (2017), the high Due to internal resources, profit
distribution will have an impact on the amount used to fulfil an organization's obligations
operational needs for the business that can result in an additional commitment. Budiart and
Santoso (2017) An organisation with high productivity will often use its own capital to
support its operations capital from retained income This is because the group currently has
adequate funding sources that are obtained from the advantages of the organisation, which
encourage the organisation to use its own money so that the Companies may be prepared to
limit the use of obligations in financial institutions. Titman and others (2014)The
organization's option in determining the amount and distribution of earnings to dividends is
known as dividend strategy indirect investors Murekefu et al. (2012): Cash earnings problem
overlooks crucial facts the association's productivity assessment is accessible to investors so
they may follow up with these lines that reduce the data's lopsidedness. Financial backers
may use such information in assessing the financial transparency of the organisation and
compromising contribution choice. Ajanthan (2013). the revenue the firm's dividend not only
provides investors with income, but it also provides information identifying the company
providing a presentation of the business's present and future. The profit motive is perhaps the
most important financial factor ways in not only approaches not just from the organization's
perspective but also from that of investors, customers, and employees administrators and
public officials. Generally speaking, dividend strategy will advise financial supporters who
believe the administration has properly managed capital to provide the expected advantage).
Triyani and Hadvidjaja According to Butt S et al. (2013), Yulianti and Nurhasana (2013), and
others, the Pecking Request Hypothesis assumes that Organization requires accounting;
compensation should be the preferred choice; and obligation should be the last Alternative
Khann and Ahmed (2017) and Vijaya and Sedhana (2015) provide examples the advantage
that is advantageous and important effect on dividend policy. According to Martalina (2011)
and Suharli (2006), there is a link between's the value of investors and their friends increases,
and if it does, it will be evident from the extraordinary yield on investors were duped by
speculators. Kesuma (2009) The ROA is used in this inquiry to assess profitability financial
supporters can gauge the organization's actual capacity to generate advantages from the
comprehensive sources. Businesses with high levels of productivity tend to use their capital
more effectively than commitment.

Methodology:
• Data Collection
The data collected from the secondary data obtained from the existing journals and
magazines, and Websites of Google Scholar and Researchgateetc.
The entire research is based on theoretical explanation method in this research paper.
• Techniques
The technique of multiple regression analysis applied to infer the results.

Discussion & Result:

V. G. Siddharth, a non-executive director of Mindtree and the creator and promoter of Coffee
Day Enterprises, said publicly that he was selling off a portion of his almost 21% ownership
position in Mindtree. V. G. Siddharth personally possessed 5.469 million shares (3.3%) of the
total ownership, while his firm, Coffee Day Enterprises, controlled 17.4 million shares
(10.63%). 10.5 million shares (6.4%) of Mindtree, an information technology (IT) business,
were held by a different entity called Coffee Day Trading Corporation. In 1999, while
Mindtree was still a struggling IT2 Start-up, V. G. Siddharth began investing in the company,
13.32% of the company's shares were owned by additional Mindtree promoters.
In March 2019, Siddharth3 offered L&T a part of his Mindtree stock. On March 18, 2019,
L&T accepted the proposition and acquired his interest. In the same month, L&T announced
an open offer to the shareholders to purchase an additional 26% investment in Mindtree with
the option of expanding it to 51%. In that scenario, Mindtree's current management would no
longer have authority over the business.
The Mindtree promoters and present management resisted the purchase fiercely.
Ten IT experts with diverse backgrounds, including Wipro, Cambridge Technology Partners,
and Lucent Technologies, but a shared love of technology and entrepreneurship founded
Mindtree.
The idea was developed by Subroto and Krishnakumar Natarajan (KK) Baghchi was initially
established as a tech firm with E-commerce is at the core. Later, as the business began to
grow, additional like-minded individuals, particularly N. S., were taking form. Scott Staples,
Kamran, Parthasarthy, Kalyan Banerjee, and Ravanan of Rostow jumped on board. Nathanael
had been linked to Wipro from 1982 to 1999 in a variety of locations where he developed the
Ecommerce division. In August 1999, when Mindtree was founded, he Had a significant part
in creating the structure and setting expanding US business. Later on, he operated the
company's development in the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, and Europe. This international
diversification significantly changed creating a risk-resilient business with a varied clientele
character. When KK4 served as Mindtree's executive chairman, LTI, a hostile bidder,
submitted their offer. Baghchi formerly held positions at Wipro and Lucent. Baghchi, who
afterwards assumed the position of non-executive, director in the business has a crucial
leadership function as the Chief Operating Officer in the challenging years between Covering
the global economic downturn between 1999 and 2007, USA and the crises that followed
9/11. A time when the majority of Baghchi relocated to when the new IT firms had to close
their doors. The USA provided assistance to the world in order to deal with the situation.
During the trying time, the leadership team sticks together. Baghchi was crucial in
developing Mindtree's Vision, Mission, Values, and aspects that are led by, like leadership
marketing and developmentthe management of knowledge actions that set the organisation
apart from competitor’s firms that specialise on technology. In a last-ditch yet audacious
attempt to block the purchase, The Mindtree board announced a share sale on March 20,
2019. After L&T's share buyback offer on the open market, repurchase.
In spite of this, even if it failed to stop the that would undoubtedly increase the bid price for
the takeover acquirer. The cash on hand at Mindtree was $1.62 billion. '8.11 billion in
investments that may be utilised for buying back.
The news of a hostile takeover is causing a stir on the Indian stock market. A medium-sized
information technology company named Mindtree is being forcedly acquired by Larsen and
Toubro, one of the biggest and most recognisable information technology companies in the
nation. The promoters of Mindtree reportedly do not want to sell to L&T, and L&T is
reportedly using all legal means at its disposal to buy this business.
The L&T Mindtree takeover appears to be motivated by avarice in the same way that most
aggressive takeovers are. However, it also serves as a wonderful case study for demonstrating
how regulatory measures have an indirect impact on the operations of every company
operating in the sector. In actuality, Mindtree's takeover proposal has little to do with how
desirable a target Mindtree is. Instead, the internal issues that L&T is having are what are
driving this offer the most.
The internal circumstances and regulatory issues that led L&T to make an unsolicited hostile
takeover offer will be examined in further detail in this article.

The History of Larsen & Toubro (L&T)

L&T has found has itself in a situation where in it has a lot of extra money. The corporation
intends to use this money to boost growth rates. One of the sectors in India with the greatest
rates of return is the software sector. This is the rationale for L&T's decision to make a
purchase in the software industry, leading to Mindtree's involvement.
Extra Cash and the Aborted Buyback Offer: L&T now has cash reserves of more than $2
billion. By the year 2020, the corporation is anticipated to increase free cash flow by an
additional $1.5 billion. Currently, 5% of this surplus money is being invested. Evidently, this
reduces the company's overall return on equity.
It is significant to notice that L&T did not choose Mindtree as the beneficiary of these
additional money. The corporation wants to repurchase outstanding shares from the market,
not sell them. The Securities and Exchanges Bureau of India prevented this $1.5 billion deal
from going through (regulator). The buyback offer was not approved by the regulator.
Because L&T's debt to equity ratio would have above 2:1 following the repurchase, SEBI
protested. This violates the compliance standards established by SEBI.
L&T did not have a lot of other choices either. The business has already been paying out too
many dividends. A staggering 33% of the company's yearly profit was distributed as a
dividend in 2016. Boosting dividends has the drawback of raising expectations for the future.
As a result, if dividends are increased now, they cannot be decreased in the future without
triggering a strong market response. This is the reason L&T decided against going the
dividend way.
Selling Non-Core of Assets: L&T is also being pushed to boost its return on equity. In the
previous ten years, the company's of the return dropped from 25% to as low as 10%.
Currently, L&T's ROE has stabilised at a commendable 15%. The stockholders, nevertheless,
are ravenous for more. In order to invest the revenues from the sale of non-core businesses in
high margin industries like software, L&T is being obliged to do so.

Mindtree
LTI would be able to dramatically increase its presence with the acquisition of Mindtree,
which operates in important areas worldwide. everything of it. The technological industry
was heavily populated by Mindtree. and media industries, which were all possibly new fields,
regarding LTI's growth. Many people were served by Mindtree. specialised IT solutions for
various sectors the financial, insurance, retail, and consumer industries Information,
Manufacturing, Education, and Transportation technologies & Transportation, Media, and
Logistics a host of other things. Using Mindtree's services might be divided into six
categories, including IT consulting, engineering research and development, and operations
software and goods for businesses. When 1999 rolled around, To create this organisation,
eleven IT specialists joined together, a firm in which a portion of the business was held
Mauritius. Venture Capital provided the initial funding for it as most IT companies are. In
2007, Mindtree released an Public listing on the Initial Public Offering (IPO) National Stock
Exchange and the Bombay Stock Exchange (NSE). Its IPO received a 100-fold increase in
demand. The business employed more than 40 people across 17 different nations. offices. At
the time the bid was announced, the business employed over 20,000 people, of which 31%
were female. The workers comprised 65. 93 percent of the workforce was made up of
different software specialists. There was a perception of Mindtree as a corporation with rapid
industry growth. its earnings profit before taxes climbed by 28.53 percent by 32.93% in 2019
compared to the year before. In the fiscal year 2018–2019, Mindtree reported revenue of $1
billion USD.

Larson &Toubro Infotech

As a division of L&T, LTI restarted operations in 1997. Since then, the company's path has
been fast-paced and exciting, with many acquisitions bolstering its growth story. It had
around 28,000 workers and a presence in more than 30 countries when it made the offer for
Mindtree public. It works in a number of service sectors, including consultancy, cloud-based
infrastructure, assurance, cyber defence resilience, and applications management. In an effort
to meet the emerging difficulties in the corporate world, digital has emerged as the all-
encompassing agent of change. LTI's business concept was to employ artificial intelligence
(AI), automation, and data analytics to better business outcomes. One of the most
technologically sophisticated digital service portfolios in the sector putting a lot of emphasis
on Internet of Things, AI, Intelligent Robotics and Digital Integration Program Automation.

Industry
As of March 2019, the Indian IT sector generated sales of US$181 billion, and growth of 7-
9% was projected during the ensuing several years. More over 80% of income, or around
US$137 billion, came from exports. By 2025, the sector is projected to reach a value of
US$350 billion. The domestic business, which brought in between $28 and $29 billion in
sales, was predicted to expand by 10 to 12 percent over the next few years. The digital
technologies sector of the IT industry was increasing at a 30% annual rate among all other
categories. By 2025, a startling 38% of the market is predicted to be accounted for by digital
technology. According to data from 2000 to 2019, the Indian IT sector received foreign direct
investments of US$37 billion. the information made public by the Department for Promotion
of International Trade and Industry (DPIIT). Several of the government's most significant
projects in order to advance IT and information technology-enabled services (ITeS) industry
in India after 2014: IT was one of the 12 champions that the government designated. services
for which an action plan would be beneficial developed. Moreover, the government
established a "50 billion investment of US$745.82 million for maximising the possibilities of
They are the leading service sectors. National Institute of Public Administration (NIPA) the
National Institutional Framework (NITI) Aayog would establish a programme at the national
level that will activities in AI and would facilitate the use of AI technology for development,
operates throughout the nation. The government of the United Kingdom included a number of
India stated its intention to start a nationwide initiative on creation of a national AI
programme with artificial intelligence (AI) portal. 2019 National Software Policy was
adopted. Indian software development is being promoted by the Union Cabinet. nation.
Considering the current state of the market and the surroundings It was only natural for any
ambitious IT professional to undertake business. LTI's purchases will enable it to grow.

Reasons for the Acquisition

Motives for the Purchase : LTI has experienced rapid expansion during the last few years.
In 2016 and 2017, the business made some highly concentrated and pure play purchases
tackling the route of inorganic growth. LTI purchased AugmentIQ in 2016. data sciences
with a focus on big data In 2017, it purchased Syncordis SA for the installation of core
banking. During the month of January 2019, LTI purchased a US-based business Due to
Ruletronics' significant introduction into the Pega Space for implementation. The portfolio of
Mindtree has strong LTI's complementing competencies and clients are available. The
substantial presence of Mindtree in the media and technology L&T's primary draw in the
industries it hadn't yet entered was to leave a trace (Figure A1 and A2). The presence of
Mindtree in industries such as retail, travel, and consumer packaged products and hospitality
might open the door for a beneficial synergy as compared to the LTI portfolio. LTI was well-
represented in the USA but was absent from Europe. Purchasing Mindtree would provide
them access to the markets in Europe. India served as the primary headquarters for both
businesses. hence, integration in terms of resolving cultural It would also be simpler to deal
with disputes.

The Great Coup

After much animosity and verbal battle, Mindtree finally deleted its share buyback plan and
adopted a conciliation strategy But the conflict was far from ended. KK stated that he was
less worried about the He was less worried about the takeover attempt and more worried
about when LTI made its bid. In an interview with a reputable newspaper, he stated:
"Mindtree completed all early projects and experienced poor margins for years, and it is
currently prepared to record top-shelf growth in the following few years. We fertilised the
area, tilled it, and planted the proper seeds, and right now it may provide a large crop.
Assuming a tornado, ruins it; that's not what shareholders should do. Protecting the interests
of employees is now the priority also clients. Many in the business were taken aback by this
impassioned outpouring. He, highlighted the necessity of maintaining optimism and realistic;
stating that lamenting the past is futile. For $980.00 per share, LTI acquired Siddhartha's
shares. moreover, it bought another 13% on the open market. Its initial goal was to eventually
hold 66 percent of the company. the Mindtree. L&T had bought a 60% share in on July 2,
2019. Mindtree has been became the business's promoter. The first hostile takeover attempt to
ever occur in India’s was produced by Swaraj Paul, an NRI (non-resident Indian). For
businesses DCM Ltd. and, sometime in the 1980s. The promoters owned 10% of Escorts
Ltd., which provided 5 shares and voting rights are expressed in percentages. Although Paul
tried unsuccessfully to purchase the firms, the Indian Law, the regulatory bodies, and the
Corporate America understood that appropriate regulation for There was a need for corporate
takeovers. after the financial changes of 1991, the necessity became even more urgent as a
result of privatisation, globalisation, and the introduction of in the nation are multinationals.
Exchange for Securities In 1992, the SEBI Board was established, and a formal There were
laid down rules for takeovers. Implementation of the acquisition: In an open offer for $50,
Billion 31% was purchased 4 E.
A transaction made on the open market secured 15%. A 20.32 percent interest in V. G.
Siddharth was purchased for around 32 billion. At '980 per share, the estimated total value of
the transaction was roughly '100.7 billion. The first hostile takeover in the Indian IT industry
has been dubbed this deal. LTI stated that it expected to own 66.32 percent of the firm overall
and, on June 6, 2019, it boosted its ownership to 28.90 percent.
On June 12, 2019, a report from Mindtree's independent directors was released amid all the
turmoil and tension between the two firms. According to this study, LTI's offer of $98 per
share was a fair one. This was yet another affirmation of LTI's claim that their offer was
everything but, antagonistic, though, and even Mr. A. M. Naik, Group Chairman of L&T
claimed that the Mindtree directors were in reality committing rather than the other way
around, antagonism. LTI had first proposed a price of $1,300 per share with a condition that
management helped with the acquisition. However, because the agreement was not well
received by the management, LTI was forced to follow the market. Movement in the share
prices of LTI Ltd. and Mindtree Ltd. between the day when V. G. Siddhartha's shares were
purchased, the acquisition's announcement and the purchase's completion date.

The Takeover Strategy for Mindtree:

After Mindtree's strategic investor attempted to sell a 20% share in the business, L&T began
to take notice of the firm. When the chance presented itself, L&T jumped at it and began
negotiations with VG Siddhartha, who is also the creator of the renowned network of Indian
coffee shops known as Café Coffee Day. By agreeing to sell his stock for $600 million, VG
Siddhartha. L&T has began to aiming for the complete the firm after it was obvious that it
could be easily acquire 21% of Mindtree's revenue.
The three-part strategy that is currently taking shape as a result has been:
 L&T intends to purchase 20% of the company from VG Siddhartha.
 After that, the corporation would purchase a 25% interest on the open market.
 Last but not least, it will make a purchase offer to L&T to all shareholders of Rs 980
per share. The goal would be to acquire ownership of as many free-floating shares as
feasible.
L&T believes that Mindtree is the finest acquisition option given the current situation and
available potential, making it the greatest immediate strategy for boosting return on equity.

Why Don't Mindtree Promoters Sell?

According to rumours, Mindtree's promoters are aware that they don't actually have a say in
the transaction. The 20% equity sale by VG Siddhartha appears to have cemented the
company's demise. However, it appears like the promoters are haggling over a lower fee.
In their opinion, L&T is undercutting them in terms of pricing. L&T has set the share price at
Rs 980. The bid is viewed as being lower by the promoters because Mindtree's share price
just dropped to 1081. L&T doesn't appear inclined to relent, though. It insists that Mindtree is
a value-neutral acquisition at the current pricing. The feasibility of the overall agreement
might be at risk if the share prices increase.
In conclusion, the unsolicited L&T bid and all the subsequent takeover drama occurred
because SEBI forbade share buybacks and also because a crucial investor needed to swiftly
sell his interest.
LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED WILL EARN A STRATEGIC EDGE THE
AFFILIATION OF THIS: For a very long time, L&T wanted to grow the scale of its IT
business. With this acquisition, it has the chance to strengthen its size-related position in the
Indian IT industry. Additionally, L&T is striving to diversify its digital offerings and
incorporate digital technology into industries other than only IT, such as engineering,
construction, and finance. This continues to be the acquisition's primary strategic goal.
Additionally, because there is little overlap between the activities of the three companies—
LTI, LTTS, and Mindtree—going ahead, there will be a great deal of operational flexibility
when integrating all the IT firms. Additionally, by integrating, redundant overhead expenses
may be cut, and more effective organisational structures can be developed. As a result, L&T
has greatly benefited from this transaction from a strategic standpoint.

Challenges being faced by L&T on post-acquisition or in future

Synergies, cost savings, client base growth, introduction of new technology, etc. are only a
few of the criteria used to analyse acquisitions globally, but notably in the technology-based
industry. several acquisitions, fail despite performing the proper due diligence because post-
acquisition cultural and human resource integration is neglected. The cultural differences
between L&T and Mindtree, two businesses with very different cultures, may be the
acquirer's largest post-acquisition worry. In contrast to Mindtree, which has a more relaxed
culture, L&T operates within the tenets of traditional management hierarchy and has a top-
down management culture in place. Culture fit becomes one of the most crucial elements for
an acquisition's success in a talent-driven industry like IT sourcing. Additionally, Mindtree's
senior executives, including Mr. Rostow Ravanan, Mr. Parthasarathy NS, and Mr.
Krishnakumar Natarajan, who were directors and served as executive chairman, executive
vice chairman, and chief operating officer, and fail despite performing the proper due
diligence owing to a lack of attention to post-acquisition culture and human resource
integration. Among others, L&T and Mindtree ethnically diversified businesses and this
distinction of culture could be the largest post. acquisition worry on the Acquirer's part Work
of L&T based on the established management concepts top-down management style and
hierarchy in place as opposed to Mindtree, which rather casual society. as a talent such as
culture fitting and IT sourcing one of the most significant factors for the completion of a
purchase. In addition, the key executives at Mindtree, such as Mr. Asst. Parthasarathy NS,
Krishnakumar Natarajan director, as well as Mr. Rostow Ravanan occupied the roles of
Executive in Chairman, Senior Vice President and Chief in Operating and officer respective
Chief in Executive Officer had left the firm previously the loss of important talent,
particularly those that oversee huge accounts can adversely if not addressed, negatively affect
the key client accounts carefully by L&T. There have been rumours the promoter's
expectation of more attrition exit. Taking care of this and incorporating the current staff at
Mindtree and fostering L&T will need its main clientele to have faith in them for a seamless
changeover. Larsen and 68.7% of Toubro Infotech (LTI) Limited's income comes from
15.3% from the United States, 16% from Europe, and 16% from remainder of the globe.
Larsen & Toubro Technology is similar 61% of Services (LTTS) Limited's income comes
from the North American.

Findings:
According to AMN, Mindtree is the ideal strategic match for L&T's long-term objectives to
expand its services business. This is evident in how institutional and ordinary investors have
acted since the transaction closed. As this analysis draws to a close, it should be noted that it
takes a different tack than Kerani and Menon (2019) and Naib and Singh (2019) and seeks to
determine whether this purchase is a good match with L&T's long-term growth plan. The
investigation comes to the conclusion that this purchase perfectly fits L&T's strategic goals in
light of the aforementioned debate. This study also significantly contributes to the body of
information showing hostile takeovers may also provide value to both the target and the
acquirer, demonstrating that these purchases need not always be seen through a negative
perspective. This report, to a large part, collects pertinent information that is currently
accessible regarding the aforementioned transaction. Future research into Mindtree's role in
the overall expansion of L&T's IT services division, however, will provide additional light on
the strategic relevance of this purchase. Incompatible interests. This is to certify that there
was no conflict of interest when this case study was being developed.

Suggestions:
We advise the following suggestions for additional sustainable improvement based on the
study above:
1. Despite the fact that research and development is one of the key drivers of corporate
growth, Larsen & Toubro (L&T) spends an excessive amount of money on it
compared to other areas such as business expansion, leverage, debt, and mortgages.
2. Larsen & Toubro (L&T) must reduce resource waste and enhance efficiency to limit
costs and operating effectiveness.
3. Larsen & Toubro (L&T) should concentrate on more creative concepts to draw
customers and grow its business. Giving extra perks will guarantee that customers feel
positive about any product.
4. Larsen & Toubro (L&T) has to create an operating plan that it can review and put into
practise. strategies for employing resources, people, and the work process effectively
and efficiently.
5. In order to fulfil customers' demands and requirements, the business should use
customer-driven processes of a goal differentiate your main talents while marketing.
A business can create programmes like customer happiness, product development,
and professional interactions with shareholders.
6. It can boost production in two ways, including by increasing the number of worker’s
individuals and rise in labour productivity together with an improvement in the
average productivity of the employees.

Conclusion:
The facts era in India area has experienced a of range of in during this years, there had been
several departures, drastically from Hexaware Atul Nisar technology. The via 2013 sale of a
proportion to Baring Asia with the departure of Patni in computers' promoters structures as
are a end result of IGATE's buy in 2010. Unheard-of takeover drama What, then, transpired
in this first-ever hostile takeover of India's IT industry. However only Time will tell if two
culturally disparate will efficaciously integrate, with inside the growth of competition to
outsourcing inside the US, Mindtree, that is currently partnered with the assist of a succesful
determine will be useful in a greater possibility to close larger agreements the generation of
automation and synthetic intelligence of methods and on-line offerings. Mindtree keeps its
independence and keeps to perform because of the fact that many monetary advisors There
can be a destiny merger with L&T Infotech. One after the other speaking, this competitive
takeover will really require traditional promoters to perform. Rethinking company method in
India to shield the promoter organization in opposition to threats such firms that seize
possibilities.

Reference:
1. Emerging Economies Cases Journal 1–10 2020 IIM, Rohtak Reprints and
permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI:
10.1177/2516604220920753 journals.sagepub.com/home/eec Management Teaching
Case.
2. Emerging Economies Cases Journal, Volume 2, Issue 1 Janki Mistry, Assistant
Professor, Department of Business and Industrial Management, Veer Narmad South
Gujarat University
3. https://www.mindtree.com
4. The Story Behind the L&T- Mindtree Takeover Bid
https://www.managementstudyguide.com/ MSG Presentations
5. © Management Study Guide Privacy Policy
6. Aggarwal V. (2017, May 9). Strategy is all about choices: Mindtree CEO. BloC.
https://bloncampus.thehindubusinessline.com/news-wrap/strategy-is-all-about-
choices-mindtree-ceo/article9687881.ece
7. Agrawal S. (2018, October 21). Investors sitting on $40 billion capital reserves for
India. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/P9bLoVi3ksJ1cHfPc97QmO/Investors-
sitting-on-40-billion-capital-reserves-for-India.html Google Scholar
8. Alvares C. (2019, March 4). Top-tier Indian IT firms lose market share to Accenture
for the first time. Livemint. https://www.livemint.com/market/mark-to-market/top-
tier-indian-it-firms-lose-market-share-to-accenture-for-the-first-time-
1551718669572.html Google Scholar
9. AMFI India. (n.d.). Average market capitalization of listed companies, Accessed on
22August22, 2020,
https://www.amfiindia.com/Themes/Theme1/downloads/Avg.%20Market%20Capitali
zation%20of%20listed%20companies%20during%20Jan-June%202018.pdf Google
Scholar
*****************************************