Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLLEGE OF N.,URl,ING
NAME: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ · -- - - AREA: _ _ _ _ __
GROUP/SECTION: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ·DATE: _ _
CLINICAL INSTRUCTOR:
OBJECTIVES:
1.
2.
3.
SKILLS LEARNED:
L . 4.
2. 5.
3. 6.
Day2
Day 3
Evaluated by:
Clinical Instructor
(Signat1ire over printed name)
Southville International School and Colleges
1281 Tropical Ave . corner Lu•ernbouf9 SI., BF International, Las Pi/las City ·
S ISC iC.JSF• NS G -0(18 R ev 000 -l .' l\l/ 10 Tel. No.: 820-8702 10 03: Fax No.: 620-87·18
COLLEGE OF NURSING
Name or Sludenl:
Clinical Ro1allon a-,-
, - - - - -- - - - - - - - Level: _ _ __ _ _ Inclusive Dates: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
r
Diagnosis; _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ __ _ _ _ __
:
I BR
• Dongle J Q;
1
· 1
·, Type ol Activity ;~ C~h_o~i~r _ _ _ _ __ ___ l :3 "'
::, lO
uU
~i
Amb
!-::: R-::P~ -- - - - -- - -- i
!l-::
]
r-::B-::S-::C~------- - -------- --- 1
.,..
<<
>
u
c-2-=============--- ---_-_-J-
I1-cc----- - - -- -,-==c.._--
How Accomplished I Self ---- -- --l IV 11 3
.
~2• A ssisted
' -· Seizure Precautions
'I
:. ' Range of Motion ,.~P~a~•~s'-,v~e' - - ---''---'-- -- - _ j
J Acti v e
L____ _.._'-A~s= ir'°'a'-'t'-'io"-n'-'-
P~re=-c=a""u""tl"o""
' n '--- - - -- -
: lnlllols
H
Deep Breath and J
Cough
i -=-
s '°'
eC::
d~B~o
-'-t;ch-,-;S"'h_o_w
_ e-, - - t-;S:-e-;1-:-
f - -- - -- - - - - i i
1 , {Circle One/ W i th Asst . SKIN BREAKDOW.N SCREEN/BRADEN SCALE
r·
I Com o lele I
I Oral Core Sensory Perception .I. Completely limi ted
j
I' Ability to respond lo
2. Very limited
' !!,! I Perl Care
3 . Slightly limiteo
l? I SIi z B 0 IIl
I' ,-.
::c: Cath Core (Q Shift) I
I Discomfort
4, No Impairmen t .I
I I Linen Chan c e
j PM Care
I
I Moisture - degree I , Constantly moist
2 . Very moist
i II
to which skin Is
exposed to moisture 3. Occasionally moist
4 . Rarely mois t
!' l NPO
I z
0
Meals Taken By Se ll Feed
Assl / Sue ervisian
Total Feed
I
i
l
'
Activity - degree of
physical activity
I. 8edfosl
2. Chalrfasl
3 . Walks occoslonolly
4. Walles frequently
100%
s
z
Amount of Maal(1)
Taken 50% Mobility - ability to
1, Completely
lmmot:>lle
Le<J lhan 50% I change and control 2. Very limited
Per O rder
Supplements Taken
I Re fused
Void ad lib
I body position 3. Sllghlly limited
4, No llmilolions
z I, Very POOr
I
Folev Cath I I
0
Urine I Nutrition - usual
2 . Probably I
'< Incant
'
I
z
~
Incontinent
lnconllnenl
Ii
Iifood inl oke po11ern inadequate
3 . Adequate
4 . Excellenl
I
I
i
Stools I . Problem
ff of Sl o ols
2. PQtential problem
- Chest Tube
R or L I To SLJ Ctlon
O ff suction
! :
Frlc:llon and Shetor
3 . No apparent
problem
.I
'
z Drains Type : _ _ _ ~F.!I Score
- :
1--- - -- - -- - ,--;;c...cc-':-t,,·o~
.. ,,= ~ -- - - - - - - '. ~ature
- =i
NGT m p ed _ __) NOTES :
::C: Plocemenl / Resid ucl
: er ii
,__S_u_c_ll_o_n_ (cE,-nf Tro c h
l im es/Shill) NT
j Oral
lnlllals
DAI LY GUIDE:
Doy 1 Asses sment, Gather Data - Identifying Problems
Da y 2 On•golng As s essmen t - Prioritize Problem - Set Goals ..., Interventions
Day 3 On-1olng Assessment - Interventions - Outcome/Evaluat io n
_ DATE:
No Problem, Alert. orie nleo •3. speech c leor.
ldenlHled
I DATE:
11ren91h eciuol in OIi exlremllles,
No Problems Bowel 1ound1 normal. abdomen
-
I
punils ea uol o nd reocllve
lOC 0Alerl
ldtinlWlod sofl. non-lender ond non•
lelhorgic dis I ended
Oblunded I Abdomen
-I
<
u
Orlenlollon
Speech I
O Pe rson
o
unrestoble
ShXTl!>d 0 Aphasic I' .,,-
<
z
0 Non-tende r
d Non-dlstoncled
lender
Dlsle ncle d
'
'
Bowel Sounds 0 Hypoocllve I
,-
0 Dlulnou l4J
Hvz) erocllve '
I ,- Nau1eo O Yl! I
0 Ataxia NO ; z Vomllln"
..."':::,
:z:
Pupil R&ocllan R
l
Brisk
0 0risk 0 Slun n ish
F'utoo
D Fl.,ed
0
•... Slool i.( o Normol
0Yel
Consnpollon
:
GI Comm•nls
i
I ;
i
Na Problems D Normal he ar! sounds. re gular
. I
No Problems 0 Urine cleor/)'flffow: dl!n,es or,y
ldenlifl•d rt1ylt11"t"l. c olor pink.. ikin w orm/t11y, Identified reproduc tive problem,
noedemo
Rhr!h m
::3 1 Regutor Irreg ular i ~ Color Ye llow Amber BIOOdy
:::,
u
H"ort Sounds : Normo1 Ab no rmal l oracler Cloo r O Cloud O Clols 7
Skin Color , 0 Pillk Du sk y 0 Fluslled Voiding
""< Skin lomo•roture , o Worm Conllnge'n l rnco,vlnen1 .
> Cote! 0 Frequency O Urgen1
.
Q !
~emo None Yes. loco lion: 0 Burnh, O Anuria
c. oolllorv Rollll , Brisk Prolonoed GU Tube Type Foley Supropubic
JVD ;
< Pulses :
Externol O Uro stom
_ _ _ _ _ __
u RoCliol ond Pedol Puls~• Presen t Femola Vagina!
Al?.'2Q!!!'CI Finding :. I. Drainage
CV Comments
i
II l Mole P&nlle No D Yes _ _ _ _ _ _ __
; Discharge
No Problems a No diilress. lur.g, clear bilolerally. i
i
GU Comm,.nls
ld .. nlnled i
ii · Re1olrollon1 1
a
no coug11
No Distress o •,sor\eo
I
No Problem, D Normal olfecl. lnloct lhouglil
i R Rhonchl I ld1tntifled processes. under!londs
i
. II Alfttcl/Mood
[
, Wheezes D Crockles hos liotlzalion/lx
Brealh Sounds Diminisheo D Ablenl 1 Normal D Ang,y/Ho1lile/Agila !e<J
tl Clear Rhonchl u Flo1/Wllhdrown Unoble lo
w11ee,es O Crockle1 i3 I Assess
O O!minisned Ab1en1 0 Though! lriloc l lJnoble,_ lc-,-)s-,-
o-ss
Processes
C!:'f Produclive 0 lnslghl
Abnormol Findinc,:
Spulum D None Cleo, CJ White Greem X D Understa nds ,,aspilolizo1io,v1x
.,..
Yellov, Brown Bloody u Does not unoersh11",ct..
0 2 Device None O NC 1.-.0>k D Collar V,
1·,osplta:izc :lon/tx
,-Artlllclol Airway None lroch D Unable lo assess
i ~esplrolory
J Psych Comments
! Comments
HIGHLY PRIORITIZED
!
'
'
i
~-~-- I
I
CRITERIA: _J
Content/ Completeness - 45% Accuracy • 40% Punctuality - 1S%
,~~/ Southvill<c? International School and (oiiczges
College of Nursing
Record of Case Conferences in Clinical Area
Level: Semester· Academic Year:
No. Date Patient Case/Topic/s Area/Ward Cl Signature Remarks
Community Hospital (Pass or Fail)
1.
2.
3.
4:
I!
5. l
6. i
I
- !
7. - I
8. \
I
I
9. •':c- -
10.
\
Prepared by:
Name of Student
Noted by:
Level Coordinator
College of Nursing
Patient-Centered Care Report Grading Shee~
Name: Over-all Mark:
Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Needs Improvement Unacceptable
91% and above 83-90% 75-82% 0-74%
Introduction (patient and You introduced the patient and You introduced the patient and You introduced the patient and but You introduced the patie°M and but
problem) lnciuded pertinent data In a dear . included pertinent data. You failed to include all pertinent data. failed to include pertinent data. You
and comprehensive.manner. You explained and covered important You attempted to explain the failed to explain the progression of
thoroughly explained the details regarding the progression of progression of the current problem. the current P!"Oblem.
progression of the current problem. the current problem.
Nursing Physical Assessment You obtained assessment data that You obtained appropriate You obtained some appropriate but You obtained minimal and
is sufficient and appropriate from at assessment data from at least three lacking assessment data from two inappropriate assessment data from
least four sources. sources. sources. two or fewer sources.
Patho-physiology Showed an exhaustive concept Showed a partially comprehensive Showed a limited / simplistic . a
Showed vague/inaccurate a,ncept
mapping of the disease (What are concept mapping of the disease concept mapping of the disease mapping of the disease (What are
the symptoms? What causes it?). (What are the symptoms? What (What are the symptoms? What the symptoms? What causes it?).
There were very clear connections causes It?). There were dear ' cau~.:Ehere were some There were little or no connections
~tween concepts. -· · - ----- - ··connections-between .concepts:-- -- connections between concepts. between concepts;
Actual Management and Outlined the current medical ·outlined the current medical Partially outlined the current Partially outlined the airrent
Related~rreatments management and treatments. management and treatments. medical management and medical management and
Comparatively analyzed and fully Analyzed and discussed treatments. Attempted to analyze treatments. Failed to analyze and
discussed management based on management based on standards of and discuss management based on discuss management based on
standards of care. care. standards of care. standards of-care.
Nursing Care You identify three problems that are You identify three problems that are .You identify three problems that are You Identify three problems that are
appropriate and supported by 100% appropriate and supported by 80% minimally appropriate and Inappropriate and supported by less
of the assess·ment data. of the assessment data . · supported by 60% the assessment than 50¾ of the assessment data.
data.
Prior itization You appropriately prioritized all You appropriately prioritized two of You appropriately prioritized only You did not appropriately prioritize
three identified problems with dear the identified problems with clear one of the three identified problems• any of the identified problems.
justifications. justifications. with the correct justification.
I
Technical Writing (APA Citations Complete/Correct Complete/Some minor errors Incomplete /incorrect Lacking/None
& Refe rencing)
Cl inical Instructor: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
SISC College of Nursing
BSN RELATED LEARNING EXPERIENCE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Introduction: This clinical evaluation tool consists of nine essential competencies with specific performance
criteria. The nine competencies were drawn from: SISC BSN Graduate / Program outcome and competencies
aligned with 5Cs institutional core values, CHED Memorandum Order No.15 series of 2017 and Philippine
Professional Nursing Practice Standards (PPNPS Resolution No.22 Series 2017). The competencies are
benchmarked with AACN's Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice (2008),
Quality and Safety Education in Nursing (2007) and NMC Standards for Pre-Registration Nursing Education
(2010) .
The performance criteria for each competency include cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning
and provide an evaluation of an individual student's performance during his/her clinical rotation in the varied
areas throughout the BSN program . This clinical evaluation report will be kept in the student's file to provide
evidence of student's performance and progress through the nursing curriculum. It also provides standard
measures for student, course, and program evaluation.
This clinical evaluation tool is to be used after every clinical rotation together with the self-evaluation Lasater
Performance Toof (Part 2). This structured evaluation is completed and shared with the student at the
conclusion of the rotation. The tool can also be used at other times during the rotation and can serve as the
basis for a learning contract.
Instructions: Faculty will rate students on each of nine competencies using the designated rating scale,
considering the quality of the performance (Almost Never Exhibits to Almost Always Exhibits). To determine
the rating for each competency, faculty will consider student performance on the specific performance criteria
and will arrive at a rating for each competency using the 0-4 scale. Faculty may also include comments related
to each competency. At the end of this clinical evaluation tool, faculty should write summary comments and
document recommendations for further developmenUimprovement. The faculty who wrote the evaluation will
review it with the student and document the date of the meeting. The student should be provided with a copy of
the evaluation. Students will also be asked to complete a self-evaluation using the Lasater Tool. Clinical
Instructor~ are to present guidelines on these assessment tools at the start of every semester during the skills
orientation period
NOTE: In these competencies, client is defined as the recipient of professional nursing services and may be an
individual, family, or group.
Expected Levels of Performance: BSN students must show steady improvement in accuracy, safety, and
efficiency, and will be expected to require less guidance in the clinical area as they progress in the program.
Rating Scale
QUALITY of PERFORMANCE
EXEMPLARY/ SELF-DIRECTED (4)
Almost Alwalr'.S Exhibits {>90'a of the time)
• clarity of focus on the client or system
• efficiency and organization
• accuracy, safety, and skillfulness
• initiative & eagerness to learn
• empathy and compassion
QUALITY of PERFORMANCE
ACCOMPLISHED/ SUPERVISED (3)
Very Often Exhibits (75% of the time)
• clarity of focus on the client or system
• efficiency and organ ization
• accuracy, safety, and skillfulness
• initiative & eagerness to learn
• empathy and compassion
QUALITY of PERFORMANCE
DEVELOPING / ASSISTED (2)
Often Exhibits (50% of the time)
• clarity of focus on the client or system
• efficiency and organization
• accuracy, safety, and skillfulness
• initiative & eagerness to learn
• empathy and compassion
QUALITY of PERFORMANCE
BEGINNING/ NOVICE (1)
Occaslonalll£ Exhibits (25% of the time)
• clarity of focus on the client or system • efficiency and organization
• accuracy, safety, and skillfulness • initiative & eagerness to learn
• empathy and compassion
QUALITY of PERFORMANCE
FAIL/ DEPENDENT (0)
Almost Never Exhibits (<10o/2 of the time)
• clarity of focus on the client or system • efficiency and organization
• accuracy, safety, and skillfulness • initiative & eagerness to learn
• empathy and compassion
RATING
3. Plans appropriate client care PO 1, 2, 3 (SCs: COMPETENCY, COMMITMENT TO ACHIEVE AND CREATIVITY)
4 3 2 1 0
RATING
4. Provides safe client-centered care PO 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12 (SCs: CHARACTER, COMPETENCY & COMMITMENT TO
ACHIEVE)
(Safe Behavior Criteria: The student is required to practice professional nursing sofely in specific client-centered
situations with clinical supervision. Sofe behavior is defined os behavior which does not place the client or self and 4 3 2 1 0
other professional staff at risk of phys/col and/or psychosocial harm. The student is subject to receiving a Failure In
the course and to being dismissed from the program if safe behavior is not consistently demonstrated.)
a. Plans and Implements evidence-based Interventions that are congruent with assessment data
Considers client needs and preferences In providing care and takes the role of client advocate by acting
b. on their behalf and In their best Interest
c. Performs nursing skills and therapeutic procedures safely and competently
j. Reports abnormal data and changes In client condition to Instructor or appropriate health team member
RATING
6. Applies knowledge relevant to client care PO 1, 2, 3, (SCS: COMPETENCY & COMMITMENT TO ACHIEVE)
4 3 2 1 0
RATING
7. Communicates effectively PO 5, 6, 7, 8 (SCs: CHARACTER, COMPETENCY & COLLABORATION)
4 3 2 1 0
a. Produces clear, le11allv accurate, timely, organized, and thorough record and documentation
b. Communicates therapeutically with clients utilizing verbal and nonverbal skills
c. Listens attentively and respectfully to others
d. Is actively involved In team building, fostering collegiality, and encouraging cooperation
e. contributes insight and helpful information to the health care team/group conferences
CLINICAL INSTRUCTOR'S COMMENTS:
8. Uses teach ing-learning process when providing individualized cllent/famlly/group education PO 1, 2, 7, 8, 12,
RATING
13 (5Cs: COMPETENCY, COMMITMENT TO ACHIEVE & CREATIVITY) 4 3 2 1 0
e. Evaluates learner outcomes, provides feedback, and revises teaching plan as needed
Instructions: Students are to rate their clinical performance according to the 11 dimensions as exemplified by
the 5Cs. Honestly evaluate oneself using the designated rating scale as follows:
Rate:
Assertively seeks Actively seeks subjective Makes limited efforts Is ineffective in seeking
infonnation to plan infonnation about to seek additional infonnation; relies mostly
intervention: carefully the patient's situation infonnation from the on objective data; has
lnfonnation seeking patient and family; often difficulty interacting
collects useful subjective from the patient and
data from observing family to support seems not to know what with the patient and
and interacting with the planning interventions; infonnation to seek family and fails to collect
patient and family occasionally does not and/or pursues unrelated important subjective
pursue important leads infonnatlon data
!Rate:
Effective interpreting involves: (5Cs: COMPETENCE)
Prioritizing data Focuses on the most Generally focuses on the Makes an effort to Has difficulty focusing
relevant and important most important data and prioritize data and focus and appears not to
data useful for explaining seeks further relevant on the most important, know which data are
the patient's condition infonnation but also but also attends to less most important to the
may try to attend to less relevant or useful data diagnosis; attempts to
pertinent data attend to all available data
Making sense of data Even when facing In most situations, In simple, common, or Even in simple, common,
complex, conflicting, or interprets the patient's familiar situations, is or familiar situations,
confusing data, is able to data patterns and able to compare the has difficulty interpreting
(a) note and make sense compares with known patient's data patterns or making sense of
of patterns in the patient's patterns to develop an
with those known and data; has trouble
data, (b) compare these intervention plan and
accompanying rationale; to develop or explain distinguishing among
with known patterns (from
the nursing knowledge the exceptions are rare intervention plans; competing explanations
base, research, personal or in complicated cases has difficulty, however, and appropriate
experience, and intuition), where it is appropriate with even moderately Interventions, requiring
and (c) develop plans for to seek the guidance of difficult data or situations assistance both in
interventions that can be a specialist or a more that are within the diagnosing the problem
justified in tenns of their experienced nurse expectations of students; and developing an
likelihood of success inappropriately requires Intervention
advice or assistance
Being skillful Shows mastery of Displays proficiency in Is hesitant or ineffective Is unable to select and/
necessary nursing skills the use of most nursing in using nursing skills or perform nursing skills
skills; could improve
speed or accuracy
Average Rating: _ _ _ __
Comment(s) / Remark(s):
Supervised by:
Cllnlcal Instructor
Attendance
Summary of Grades
Part 1. Clinical Evaluation Part 2. Lasater Clinical Judgement PCCR (20%) Quizzes, NCPs, Attendance
Tool (40%) Self- Evaluation (20%) etc (10%) (10%)