Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anterior Eye
JOHN G LAWRENSON
shedding and replacement to maintain corneal integrity. Three Basal cells consist of single-layer columnar cells with a verti-
distinct epithelial cell types are recognized: a single row of basal cally oriented oval nucleus. Ultrastructurally, they are similar in
cells, 2–3 rows of wing cells and 2–3 layers of superficial (squamous) appearance to wing cells. The plasma membrane similarly shows
cells. In addition, several non-epithelial cells are present (e.g. pronounced infolding and the cytoplasm contains prominent
lymphocytes, macrophages and Langerhans cells). The epithelium intermediate filaments. A variety of cell junctions are present
forms a permeability barrier to water, ions and hydrophilic including: desmosomes, which mediate adhesion between cells;
molecules above a certain size, as well as forming an effective hemidesmosomes, which are involved in the attachment of basal
barrier to the entry of pathogens. Further epithelial specialization cells to the underlying stroma; and gap junctions, which allow for
enhances adhesion between cells, to withstand shearing and intercellular metabolic coupling. Basal cells form the germative
abrasive forces. Furthermore, throughout the thickness of the layer of the cornea, and mitotic cells are often seen at this level.
epithelium, adjacent cells are connected to one another by water
channels (aquaporins) that are engaged in transcellular water Basal Lamina and Bowman’s Layer. The basal lamina
transport and gap junctions to allow the transfer of ions and small (basement membrane) is synthesized by basal cells. It varies
molecules between cells (Bron et al., 2015). in thickness between 0.5 and 1 μm, and under the electron
Superficial cells are structurally modified for their barrier microscope can be differentiated into an anterior clear zone
function and interaction with the tear film. Scanning elec- (lamina lucida) and a posterior darker zone (lamina densa).
tron microscopy of surface cells shows extensive finger-like The basal lamina is part of a complex adhesion system, which
and ridge-like projections (microvilli and microplicae), which mediates the attachment of the epithelium to the underlying
increase the epithelial surface area. Light, medium and dark stroma (Fig. 2.3). Hemidesmosomes link the cytoskeleton via a
cells can be distinguished depending on the number and pat- series of anchoring fibrils to anchoring plaques in the anterior
tern of surface projections (Pfister, 1973). It has been sug- stroma. The molecular components of this adhesion complex
gested that dark cells, which are relatively free of these surface have been identified and include type VII collagen, integrins,
features, are close to being desquamated into the tear film. By laminin and bullous pemphigoid antigen (Gipson et al., 1987).
contrast, the newly arrived light cells possess a more extensive Bowman’s layer (anterior limiting membrane) varies in thick-
array of surface projections. In high-power transmission elec- ness between 8 and 14 μm. With the light microscope it appears as
tron micrographs, microvilli and microplicae show an extensive an acellular homogeneous zone. Ultrastructurally, it is composed
filamentous covering known as the glycocalyx. The glycocalyx of a randomly oriented array of fine collagen fibrils, which merge
is formed from membrane-bound mucin glycoproteins and is with the fibrils of the anterior stroma (Hogan et al., 1971). Fibrils
important for spreading and attachment of the precorneal tear are composed primarily of collagen types I, III and V. Collagen VII,
film. In accordance with their barrier function, a complex net- associated with anchoring fibrils, is also present. There is evidence
work of tight junctions links superficial cells that exclude water- that Bowman’s layer is formed and maintained primarily by the epi-
soluble dyes such as fluorescein (Bron et al., 2015). thelium, although its function is unclear. The absence of Bowman’s
Wing cells are so named because of their characteristic layer from the cornea of most mammals, and the fact that corneas
shape, with lateral extensions and a concave inferior surface to devoid of this layer over the central cornea following photorefrac-
accommodate the apices of the basal cells. Their nuclei tend to tive keratectomy (PRK) apparently function normally, suggest that
be spherical or elongated in the plane of the cornea. The cell it is not critical to corneal integrity (Wilson and Hong, 2000).
borders of the polygonal wing cells show prominent infoldings
that interdigitate with adjacent cells, and numerous desmo- Stroma. The stroma is approximately 500 μm thick, and
somes. This arrangement results in a strong intercellular adhe- accounts for 90% of the thickness of the cornea. It is composed
sion. The cytoplasm contains prominent cytoskeletal elements predominantly of collagen fibrils (70% dry weight) embedded in
(predominantly actin and cytokeratin intermediate filaments), a highly hydrated matrix of proteoglycans. A variety of collagen
and although the usual complement of organelles is present they
are few in number.
%DVDOFHOO
'
&6
+'
%/
%RZPDQ¶V
OD\HU
$)
$3 6WURPD
%/
Fig. 2.3 Schematic representation of the adhesion system of the cor-
neal epithelium. Intermediate filaments in the cytoskeleton (CS) are
Fig. 2.2 Corneal epithelium (detail). Three cell types are present: linked through hemidesmosomes (HD) via anchoring fibrils (AF) to an-
basal cells (asterisk), wing cells (arrowhead) and squamous cells (arrow). choring plaques (AP) in the anterior stroma. BL = basal lamina; D = des-
BL = Bowman’s layer. mosome.
12 PART 1 Introduction
Fig. 2.4 Section through the stroma. Keratocytes (arrowed) are locat-
ed between lamellae.
Fig. 2.6 Flat section through the stroma stained with gold chloride.
Keratocytes (arrowed) display a stellate appearance.
'0
&RUQHDO
6FOHUD HQGRWKHOLXP *O\FRJHQ *OXFRVH
&RUQHDO
&RQWDFW $TXHRXV VWURPD
OHQV KXPRXU &RUQHDO *OXFRVHSKRVSKDWH
+03
&LOLDU\ERG\ HSLWKHOLXP
VKXQW
1$'3+
&RUQHD ,QFUHDVHG 7HDU
2[\JHQ WKLFNQHVV ILOP
&2 &2
$73
:DWHU /DFWLF
&U\VWDOOLQH
OHQV DFLG
2[\J 7&$
HQ /DFWDWH 3\UXYDWH
,ULV F\FOH
$73
$QWHULRUFKDPEHU
FRQWDLQLQJDTXHRXV
KXPRXU &RQWDFWOHQV
EORFNVR[\JHQ &2
$ %
Fig. 2.11 (A) Cross-section of an eye wearing a contact lens, which Fig. 2.12 Metabolic pathways present in the cornea. HMP = hexose
impedes ingress of oxygen into, and the egress of carbon dioxide from, monophosphate shunt; TCA cycle = tricarboxylic acid (Krebs) cycle;
the cornea. (B) The contact lens blocks oxygen supply to the cornea (1), ATP = adenosine triphosphate; NADPH = nicotinamide adenine dinucle-
causing lactic acid to accumulate in the stroma (2). This draws in water otide phosphate (reduced form).
(3), leading to stromal oedema (4). (Adapted from Efron, N. (1997). Con-
tact lenses and corneal physiology. Biol. Sci. Rev., 9, 29–31.)
diffuse slowly across the endothelium into the anterior cham-
ber. However, during periods of hypoxia the proportion of glu-
availability (Klyce and Beuerman, 1998). The oxygen flux into cose that is metabolized anaerobically increases. The resulting
the cornea can be measured using polarographic oxygen sen- accumulation of lactate causes stromal oedema via an increased
sors. It is in the region of 6 μl / cm2 / h for the cornea as a whole, osmotic load (Klyce, 1981) and localized tissue acidosis (Klyce
although the consumption rate for its composite layers is not and Beuerman, 1998).
equal. Consumption rates have been estimated as 40 : 39 : 21 for The hexose monophosphate shunt (also known as the pen-
the epithelium, stroma and endothelium, respectively (Free- tose phosphate shunt) plays an important role in the corneal
man, 1972). epithelium (Berman, 1981), where it fulfils several important
Several lines of evidence indicate that the aqueous humour is functions, including the generation of intermediates for biosyn-
the primary source of glucose and essential amino acids for the thetic reactions and the prevention of oxidative damage by free
cornea (Maurice, 1984). The glucose concentration of tears is radicals.
low compared with that in the aqueous humour, and the inser-
tion of nutrient-impermeable implants into the stroma results
CORNEAL TRANSPARENCY
in degeneration of the tissue lying anterior to the implant.
Although exogenous glucose is primarily utilized, glycogen Under normal conditions the cornea is highly transparent,
stores are present in all corneal cells to provide glucose in con- transmitting more than 90% of incident light. Structurally, the
ditions of metabolic stress. cornea is a typical connective tissue consisting principally of a
The role of the perilimbal vasculature in the provision of matrix of collagen and proteoglycans. Under normal circum-
oxygen and nutrients appears limited and it is likely that it is stances such an arrangement would favour light scatter with
significant only for the corneal periphery (Maurice, 1984). consequent loss of transparency. This raises two fundamental
questions: how is transparency achieved, and how is it main-
Oxidative Metabolism tained? To begin to answer these questions it is necessary to
The cornea derives its energy principally from the oxidative understand the spatial organization of the stromal matrix and
breakdown of carbohydrates (Riley, 1969). Glucose, which the importance of corneal hydration control.
is the primary substrate for the generation of adenosine tri-
phosphate (ATP), is catabolized by three metabolic pathways: Stromal Organization
glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid (Krebs) cycle and the hex- Maurice (1957) explained the transparency of the cornea on the
ose monophosphate shunt (Fig. 2.12). Anaerobic glycolysis basis of the small diameter and regular separation of the stro-
accounts for the majority (85%) of glucose metabolism. In mal collagen. He suggested that the collagen fibrils of the stroma
this pathway, glucose is first oxidized to pyruvate and then were disposed in a regular crystalline lattice, and that light scat-
subsequently reduced to lactate, with a net yield of two mol- tered by the fibrils is eliminated by destructive interference in
ecules of ATP per mole of glucose. The TCA cycle results in all directions other than the forward direction. This situation
a greater energy yield (36 ATP). This pathway is most active will hold as long as the axes of the collagen fibrils are arranged
in the corneal endothelium, which has the greatest energy in a regular lattice with a separation less than the wavelength of
requirement. light. It has been suggested, however, that the fibrillar arrange-
Metabolic waste products can be potentially damaging if ment need not be in a perfect crystal lattice to maintain trans-
allowed to accumulate. Although carbon dioxide can readily parency (Maurice, 1984), although disruption of short-range
diffuse out of the cornea across its limiting layers, lactate is less order between fibrils will lead to increased scatter and a loss of
easily eliminated. Under normoxic conditions, lactate is able to transparency.
16 PART 1 Introduction
'HVFHPHW¶VPHPEUDQH
(Scott, 1991). Proteoglycans are a family of glycoproteins that
consist of a protein core to which are attached sugar chains
$TXHRXV
6WURPD
of repeating disaccharide units termed glycosaminoglycans +2
. 7-
(GAGs). These molecules are increasingly being recognized 1D
as important prerequisites for transparency (Quantock and
Young, 2008; Hassell and Birk, 2010). Proteoglycans were origi- 1D
nally classified according to their glycosaminoglycan composi- + +&2±
tion; however, current nomenclature groups them into families
1D
based on homologous sequences of amino acids in their protein +&2±
core. Corneal stromal proteoglycans are members of the small
&2+2 +&2±+
leucine-rich family, which are small enough to fit in the space
&$
between collagen fibrils. The most prevalent glycosaminoglycan
in the cornea is keratan sulphate, which is found in three types Fig. 2.13 Schematic representation of the corneal endothelial pump.
of proteoglycan: lumican, keratocan and mimecan (Funder- CA = carbonic anhydrase; TJ = tight junction.
burgh et al., 1991; Funderburgh 2000). The other type of corneal
proteoglycan is decorin, which contains a hybrid chondroitin dioxide by the enzyme carbonic anhydrase. Bicarbonate leaves
sulphate / dermatan sulphate side chain. Evidence from several the cell via an apical bicarbonate ion channel. The driving force
sources has shown that lumican and decoran play important for the bicarbonate flux is generated by a sodium–potassium
roles in regulating collagen fibril diameter and maintaining the ATPase that resides on the basolateral endothelial membrane.
spacing between fibrils once formed, which are essential for The energy associated with subsequent sodium re-entry (via
transparency. Na+ / H+ and Na+ / HCO3− transporters) is coupled to active
HCO3− flux (Hodson et al., 1991).
Hydration Control The epithelium also contributes to corneal hydration con-
The state of corneal hydration is another important determi- trol (Klyce and Beuerman, 1998). The tight junctions between
nant of corneal transparency (Bonanno 2012). The hydrophilic superficial epithelial cells form an effective permeability barrier
properties of the stroma are to a large part determined by pro- to ions and polar solutes. For example, the anionic molecule
teoglycans, which contribute to the fixed negative charge of the sodium fluorescein does not penetrate an intact epithelium.
stroma and produce a passive gel swelling pressure through However, damage to the superficial cells allows fluorescein to
electrostatic repulsion (Hodson, 1997). Physiologically, corneal enter the epithelium, with resulting corneal staining. In addition
hydration is maintained at approximately 78%. If the cornea is to its barrier properties, the epithelium also possesses active ion
allowed to swell ±5% of this value, it begins to scatter significant transport systems for Na+ and Cl−. As these pumps contribute
quantities of light (Hodson, 1997). to the tonicity of the tear film, it is likely that they are involved
Maintenance of physiological corneal hydration is to a large in the maintenance of stromal hydration.
part dependent on the corneal endothelium, which possesses
both a barrier property and a metabolically driven pump. The Response to Oedema
endothelial barrier to the free passage of molecules from the When corneas swell, light scattering increases, with an ensued
aqueous humour is formed principally by focal tight junctions transparency loss due to the disruption of the regular collagen
between adjacent endothelial cells. However, in contrast to matrix. The collagen fibrils themselves swell very little and most
other barrier epithelia, these junctions are of low electrical resis- of the additional water goes into the interfibrillar spaces. Trans-
tance and allow the passage of ions and small molecules. This mission electron micrographs of oedematous corneas show
leak is offset by the metabolically driven pumping of ions out of fibril aggregation, with the result that large areas are devoid of
the stroma by the endothelium, which maintains a transcellular collagen fibrils (Stiemke et al., 1995). There is evidence that col-
potential difference (aqueous side negative) to balance stromal lagen aggregation occurs as a result of loss of GAGs, which pre-
swelling pressure (Maurice, 1984). Disruption of this osmotic viously had maintained fibre separation (Stiemke et al., 1995).
gradient will result in stromal fluid imbibition.
The specific endothelial ion transport mechanisms respon-
CORNEAL EPITHELIAL WOUND HEALING
sible for the maintenance of physiological hydration are not
fully understood. A simplified model representing our cur- A smooth and intact corneal epithelium is necessary in order
rent level of knowledge is represented in Fig. 2.13. There is for the cornea to maintain clear vision. However, due to its
compelling evidence that a flux of bicarbonate ions is the pre- exposed position the cornea is potentially vulnerable to a vari-
dominant component of the endothelial ion transport system ety of external insults. It possesses several protective mecha-
(Hodson and Miller, 1976). Subsequent studies have identified nisms to avoid injury, but if tissue damage occurs it is capable
that Cl− transporters may also be important in maintaining the of an effective wound-healing response (Gipson and Inatomi,
pump (Bonanno 2012). The bicarbonate is generated either 1995; Nishida and Tanaka, 1996). Corneal epithelial repair is a
by a Na+ / HCO3− co-transporter located on the basolateral complex process involving an orchestrated interaction between
plasma membrane or via the intercellular conversion of carbon cells and extracellular matrix, which is coordinated by a variety
2 Anterior Eye 17
of growth factors. The process can be divided into three phases: 2UELWDOSDUW
(1) initial covering of the denuded area by cell migration, (2)
cell proliferation to replace lost cells and (3) epithelial differen- 7DUVDO
tiation to re-form the normal stratified epithelial architecture. SDUW
6XSHULRU
Following a full-thickness epithelial defect, fibronectin, an SDOSHEUDO
adhesive glycoprotein, is synthesized and covers the surface of VXOFXV
the bared stroma where it serves as a temporary matrix for cell ,QIHULRU
migration. The adhesion between fibronectin and the epithe- SDOSHEUDO
lium is mediated by integrin–matrix interactions (integrins are a 0DODU VXOFXV
family of cell surface receptors that bind to certain extracellular VXOFXV 1DVRMXJDO
matrix proteins). Several growth factors have been implicated in VXOFXV
the control of the wound-healing response, including epidermal
growth factor, transforming growth factor beta, platelet-derived Fig. 2.14 Surface anatomy of the eyelids. (Adapted from Bron, A. J.,
growth factor and fibroblast growth factor (Gipson and Ina- Tripathi, R. C. & Tripathi, B. (1997). Wolff’s Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit
tomi, 1995). Growth factors, which are produced by a variety of (8th ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.)
sources (e.g. ocular surface epithelia and the lacrimal gland), are
able to regulate the process of epithelial migration, proliferation
and differentiation. There is evidence that epithelial–stromal of the fissure is approximately 30–31 mm, with a vertical height
interactions play an important role in corneal wound healing of 10–11 mm. In the primary position, the upper lid, which is
(Wilson, 2000). Epithelial injury triggers keratocyte apoptosis the larger and more mobile of the two, typically covers approxi-
(programmed cell death) in the anterior stroma, via the release mately the upper third of the cornea, whilst the lower lid is level
of apoptosis-inducing cytokines from epithelial cells. Kerato- with the inferior corneal limbus (Fig. 2.14). Important differ-
cyte apoptosis subsequently triggers a wound-healing cascade, ences in eyelid anatomy exist between Asian and Caucasian eyes
which influences epithelial repair. (Saonanon, 2014). The most obvious feature of the Asian eye is
Regeneration of the corneal epithelium is highly dependent the absent or very low lid fold and fuller upper eyelid.
on the integrity of the limbus (Lavker et al., 2004). Cumulative The eyelid margins are about 2 mm thick from front to back.
evidence indicates that a proportion of limbal basal epithelial The posterior quarter consists of conjunctival mucosa and the
cells possess the properties of stem cells, which are ultimately anterior three-quarters is skin. The junction between the two is
responsible for corneal epithelial replacement. Stem cells have referred to as the mucocutaneous junction. There has recently
several unique characteristics: they are poorly differentiated, been a renewed interest in the marginal zone of the human eyelid,
long lived and have a high capacity for self-renewal. When these with the identification of the role of the inner lid border, termed
cells divide, one of the daughter cells replenishes the stem cell the ‘lid-wiper’ owing to the analogy to a windscreen wiper, in
pool, whilst the other is destined to undergo further cell divi- the distribution of the tear film (Knop et al., 2011a, 2012). Two
sions before differentiating. Such a cell is referred to as a tran- or three rows of eyelashes (cilia) arise from the anterior border
sient amplifying cell. Transient amplifying cells undergo several of the lid margins. These are longer and more numerous in the
rounds of cell division before fully differentiating. These cells upper lid. The lashes receive a rich sensory nerve supply, and
play an important role in epithelial wound healing, where their their sensitivity provides an effective alerting mechanism.
proliferative capacity is increased by shortening cycle times and The meibomian (tarsal) gland orifices emerge just anterior
increasing the number of times that the transient amplifying to the mucocutaneous junction (Fig. 2.15). About 30–40 glands
cells can divide before maturation. open onto the upper margin, and slightly fewer (20–40) onto
the lower. On eversion of the lids the yellowish meibomian
The Ocular Adnexa acini are visible as yellow clusters through the tarsal conjunc-
tiva (Bron et al., 1991; Knop et al., 2011b). Meibomian glands
The ocular adnexa are those structures that support and pro- can be more clearly visualized using infrared meibography, and
tect the eye, and include the eyelids, conjunctiva and lacrimal instruments that use this method are now commercially avail-
system. They play an important role in the formation of the pre- able (Srinivasan et al., 2012) (Fig. 2.16). At the medial angle,
ocular tear film and collectively defend the eye against antigenic the eyelid margins enclose a triangular space – the lacus lacri-
challenge. malis – which contains the plica semilunaris and the caruncle.
Lacrimal papillae are small elevations located 5–6 mm from the
EYELIDS medial canthal angle, which contains a small aperture (punc-
tum) that is the opening to the lacrimal drainage system.
The eyelids are two mobile folds of skin that perform several
important functions: they act as occluders that shield the eyes Muscles of the Eyelids
from excessive light, and through their reflex closure they afford Movements of the eyelids are governed by the coordinated
protection against injury. The lids also form a precorneal tear action of several muscles.
film of uniform thickness during the upturn phase of each
blink. The action of blinking is also important for tear drainage. Orbicularis Oculi. The orbicularis oculi is the sphincter muscle
of the eyelids, and can anatomically be divided into two main
Gross Anatomy divisions: the palpebral and the orbital (Fig. 2.17). Fibres of the
The eyelids are joined at their extremities, termed ‘the canthi’, palpebral division arise from the medial palpebral ligament
and when the eye is open, an elliptical space, the palpebral fis- and arc across the eyelids in a series of half-ellipses, meeting at
sure, is formed between the lid margins. In the adult, the length the lateral canthus to form a lateral raphe. The lateral palpebral
18 PART 1 Introduction
0HLERPLDQRULILFHV G
0XFRXV
PFM
PHPEUDQH
F
0DUJLQDO E
VNLQ
D
/DVKHV D
E
$
F
D
V
WP
73
(6
W
22F
2
%
/
'
=
0
() 0
Fig. 2.27 Diagram showing the regional variation in goblet cell densi-
ty. Goblet cell density is greatest over the caruncle, plica semilunaris and
inferior nasal palpebral conjunctiva. (Adapted from Bron, A. J., Tripathi,
R. C. & Tripathi, B. (1997). Wolff’s Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit (8th ed.).
London: Chapman and Hall. Reproduced from Bron, 1997.)
Fig. 2.28 Histological section through a lymphoid follicle (F). Note the
modification of the overlying epithelium (asterisk).
The apices of many surface epithelial cells of the conjunc-
tiva contain numerous carbohydrate-containing secretory
vesicles, which are seen to migrate to the cell surface where
they fuse with the plasma membrane (Dilly, 1985). It is likely
that this represents a mechanism for recycling the cell sur-
face glycocalyx rather than a secondary source of secretory
mucin.
2'
3'
/$
Fig. 2.31 Low-power light micrograph of the lacrimal gland. Acini are
arrowed. Adipose connective tissue (asterisks) extends across the gland.
Fig. 2.30 Lateral view of the orbit showing the position of the lacrimal
gland. The levator aponeurosis (LA) partially divides the gland into an
orbital (OD) and palpebral (PD) division. (Adapted from Kronfeld, P. C.,
McHugh, S. L. & Polyak, S. L. (1943). The Human Eye in Anatomical
Transparencies. Rochester, NY: Bausch & Lomb.)
Functional Considerations
The conjunctiva contributes the mucin component of the pre-
ocular tear film and plays an important role in the defence of
the ocular surface against microbial infection. Mucins are a
family of high-molecular-weight glycoproteins that include
membrane-bound and secretory varieties (Corfield et al., 1997;
Gipson and Inatomi, 1997; Hodges and Dartt, 2013). Goblet
cells are the primary source of secretory mucin, whilst sur-
face epithelial cells of both the conjunctiva and cornea possess
mucin-like molecules within their glycocalyx. The conjunctiva Fig. 2.32 Electron micrograph of part of a lacrimal acinus showing
also forms part of a common mucosal defence system, which light and dark secretory cells.
is an important component of the defence of the human body
against microorganisms (McClellan, 1997; Knop and Knop, a lower palpebral lobe, which can often be visualized through
2005). The conjunctiva possesses the immunological capacity the conjunctiva upon lid eversion (Bron, 1986). The gland is
for antigen processing, and cell-mediated and humoral immu- pinkish in colour, with a lobulated surface. Between 6 and 12
nity. Humoral immunity is provided by specific antibodies (par- ducts leave the gland through the palpebral lobe and discharge
ticularly immunoglobulin A [IgA]) produced by transformed B into the conjunctival sac at the upper lateral fornix.
cells (plasma cells) in the stroma. T lymphocytes form the basis
of cell-mediated immunity. Microscopic Anatomy. The lacrimal gland is tubuloacinar in
form (Fig. 2.31). Its secretory units (acini) contain secretory
cells surrounded by myoepithelial cells (Ruskell, 1975). Acinar
LACRIMAL SYSTEM
secretory cells show extensive folding of their plasma membrane
The lacrimal apparatus provides for the production and main- and apical microvilli. Adjacent cells are linked by tight junctions
tenance of the preocular tear film. The normal function of this that restrict diffusion between cells. The most prominent feature
system is essential for the integrity of the ocular surface and the of these cells is the presence of abundant secretory granules.
provision of a smooth refractive surface. The lacrimal apparatus Two principal secretory cell subtypes have been identified on
comprises a secretory system that includes the main and acces- the basis of their granule content (Fig. 2.32). The majority of
sory lacrimal glands, and a drainage system that consists of the cells contain dark granules (dark cells), with a smaller number
paired puncta and canaliculi, the lacrimal sac and the nasolac- of cells containing light granules (light cells). The functional
rimal duct. significance of this heterogeneity is uncertain at present. Ducts
consist of a single layer of cuboidal cells that lack secretory
Lacrimal Gland granules. Myoepithelial cells are dendritic cells that are closely
Gross Anatomy. The main lacrimal gland is the key provider associated with the perimeter of acini and ducts. It is likely that
of the aqueous component of the tears. The gland is located in a these contractile cells play a role in the expulsion of tears from the
shallow depression of the frontal bone behind the superolateral gland. The interstices of the gland contain numerous blood vessels
orbital rim (Fig. 2.30). It is partially split by the aponeurosis and nerves. A large population of immune cells (particularly IgA-
of the levator palpebrae into an upper larger orbital lobe and secreting plasma cells) are also found between acini.
24 PART 1 Introduction
6&
6& /DFULPDOJODQG
$QWLJHQ
,J$ /6
,J$
6
&,
J$
3
*, &
&LUFXODWLRQ
WUDFW
3H\HU¶VSDWFKHV 1/'
Fig. 2.33 Diagram showing the role of the gastrointestinal tract gen-
erating specific immunoglobulin A (IgA) in the lacrimal gland. Antigens
which challenge the ocular surface ultimately drain to the gastrointes-
tinal (GI) tract where they stimulate B cells in Peyer’s patches (gut-as- Fig. 2.34 Illustration of the lacrimal drainage system. C = canaliculi;
sociated lymphoid tissue). Sensitized B cells then pass to the lacrimal LS = lacrimal sac; P = punctum; NLD = nasolacrimal duct. (Adapted from
gland via the circulation. SC = secretory component. (Adapted from Al- Kronfeld, P. C., McHugh, S. L. & Polyak, S. L. (1943). The Human Eye in
lansmith, M. R. (1992). The Eye and Immunology. Maryland Heights, MO: Anatomical Transparencies. Rochester, NY: Bausch & Lomb.)
Mosby. Copyright Elsevier 2002.)
7HDUILOP
FUNCTION AND PROPERTIES OF THE 0HLERPLDQ
PREOCULAR TEAR FILM JODQGV
The tear film is a complex fluid that covers the exposed parts of the
ocular surface framed by the eyelid margins. The physical charac-
teristics of this fluid are summarized in Table 2.2. Classically, the
(\HOLG
tear film has been regarded as a trilaminar structure with a super-
ficial lipid layer secreted by the meibomian glands, which overlies
an aqueous phase derived from the main and accessory lacrimal
glands, and an inner mucinous layer consisting of membrane- ,RQV
spanning mucins of the ocular surface epithelium and secretory +2
/LSLG
mucins produced mainly by conjunctival goblet cells. The tear
film performs several important functions, which can be broadly
classified as optical, metabolic support, protective and lubrication.
By smoothing out irregularities of the corneal epithelium, the &RQMXQFWLYDO
tear film creates an even surface of good optical quality that is re- 0XFXV HSLWKHOLXP
*REOHWFHOOV
formed with each blink. The air–tear interface forms the principal
refractive surface of the optical system of the eye and provides two-
thirds (43 D) of its total refractive power. As the cornea is avascular Fig. 2.35 Schematic representation of the orbital glands, which contrib-
ute the various components of the preocular tear film. (Adapted from Dartt,
it is dependent on the tear film for its oxygen provision. When the D. A. (1992). Physiology of tear production. In M. A. Lemp & R. Marquardt
eye is open the tear film is in a state of equilibrium with the oxygen (eds) The Dry Eye: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.)
in the atmosphere, and gaseous exchange takes place across the
tear interface. The constant turnover of the tear film also provides
a mechanism for the removal of metabolic waste products. (i.e. in response to strong physical or emotional stimulation) is
Tears play a major role in the defence of the eye against mediated by the main lacrimal gland. However, Jordan and Baum
microbial colonization. The washing action of the tear fluid (1980) questioned the concept of basic and reflex secretion, and
reduces the likelihood of microbial adhesion to the ocular sur- suggested that it is more accurate to think of tear output as a con-
face. Moreover, the tears contain a host of protective antimicro- tinuum, whereby the rate of production is proportional to the
bial proteins. The tear film acts as a lubricant, smoothing the degree of sensory or emotive stimulation (Dartt, 2009). This con-
passage of the lids over the corneal surface and preventing the cept would also mean that a functional distinction between main
transmission of damaging shearing forces. To facilitate this, tear and accessory lacrimal glands, in terms of basal and reflex tear
fluid displays non-Newtonian behaviour with respect to shear production, is unnecessary. Rather, it is more likely that tear flow
(Tiffany, 1991). Newtonian fluids maintain a constant viscosity is the combination of contributions from both glands, although
with increasing shear rates. By contrast, tear fluid has a rela- the output from the accessory glands alone is sufficient to main-
tively high viscosity between blinks to aid stability, and with tain a stable tear layer (Maitchouk et al., 2000).
increasing shear rates during the blink process the viscosity falls
dramatically, thereby easing the movement of the lids over the SOURCES AND COMPOSITION
ocular surface.
Tears are composed of a complex secretion that combines the
Tear Production products of several glands (Fig. 2.35). Although the precise com-
Jones (1966) first used the terms ‘basic (basal)’ and ‘reflex’ to position of tear fluid varies with collection method, flow rate and
describe tear flow. He proposed that the accessory lacrimal glands time of day, it can be considered as a watery secretion containing
were the basic (minimal flow) secretors, and that reflex secretion electrolytes and proteins, with lesser amounts of lipid and mucin.
26 PART 1 Introduction
$LU
+\GURSKRELFOLSLG
+\GURSKLOLFOLSLG
/LSLG $TXHRXV
$TXHRXVSKDVH
6HFUHWHGPXFLQ
08&$&
0XFLQRXVSKDVH *O\FRFDO\[
08&
0LFURYLOOL
(SLWKHOLXP
Fig. 2.37 Diagram showing the composition of the preocular tear
Fig. 2.36 Lipid layer of the preocular tear film viewed in specular re- film. Insets show details of the glycocalyx and lipid–aqueous interface.
flection. A ‘wave’ appearance can be seen, which represents the most (Adapted from Corfield, A. P., Carrington, S. D., Hicks, S. J. et al. (1997).
commonly observed lipid pattern in the population. Ocular mucins: purification, metabolism and functions. Prog. Retin. Eye
Res., 16, 627–656.)
provide a hydrophobic barrier at the lid margin to prevent over- is thought to consist of a mixture of soluble and gel-forming
spill of tears, and to cover the surface of the tear film to retard mucins (Hodges and Dartt, 2013).
evaporation (Craig and Tomlinson, 1997).
Conclusion
MODELS OF TEAR FILM STRUCTURE
It is clear from the above account that our understanding of the
The classical trilaminar model of tear film structure in terms of structure and function of the anterior eye is far from complete,
a superficial lipid layer, a middle aqueous layer and deep mucin which places certain limits on our understanding of clinical,
layer, first proposed by Wolff and subsequently modified by contact-lens-related phenomena. It is essential, therefore, that
Holly and Lemp (1977), has received broad acceptance. How- future research continues to focus on fundamental aspects of
ever, the results of recent studies have led to a re-evaluation of ocular anatomy and physiology, as well as on the more applied
the nature of the aqueous and mucinous layers. Several pieces of clinical applications that are described in the remainder of this
evidence have suggested that the mucin contribution to the tear book.
film is much greater than was previously thought (Prydal et al.,
1992), and an alternative tear film model, which possesses a Access the complete references list online at
substantial mucinous phase, has been proposed (Fig. 2.37). The http://www.expertconsult.com.
nature of the mucinous phase has not been fully established, but
REFERENCES
Allansmith, M. R. (1992). The Eye and Immunol- Funderburgh, J. L. (2000). Keratan sulphate: struc- King-Smith, P. E., Hinel, E. A., & Nichols, J. J.
ogy. St Louis, MO: Mosby. ture, biosynthesis and function. Glycobiology, 10, (2010). Application of a novel interferometric
Belmonte, C., Garcia-Hirschfeld, J., & Gallar, J. 951–958. method to investigate the relation between lipid
(1997). Neurobiology of ocular pain. Prog. Retin. Funderburgh, J. L., Funderburgh, M. L., Mann, M. layer thickness and tear film thinning. Invest.
Eye Res., 16, 117–156. M., et al. (1991). Physical and biological proper- Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 51, 2418–2423.
Berman, E. R. (1981). Biochemistry of the Eye. New ties of keratan sulphate proteoglycan. Biochem. Klyce, S. D. (1981). Stromal lactate accumulation
York: Plenum Press. Soc. Trans., 19, 871–876. can account for corneal oedema osmotically fol-
Bonanno, J. A. (2012). Molecular mechanisms un- Gipson, I. K., & Inatomi, T. (1995). Extracellular lowing epithelial hypoxia in the rabbit. J. Physi-
derlying the corneal endothelial pump. Exp. Eye matrix and growth factors in corneal wound ol., 321, 49–64.
Res., 95, 2–7. healing. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol., 6, 3–10. Klyce, S. D., & Beuerman, R. W. (1998). Structure
Bron, A. J. (1986). Lacrimal streams: the demon- Gipson, I. K., & Inatomi, T. (1997). Mucin genes and function of the cornea. In H. E. Kaufman, B.
stration of human lacrimal fluid secretion and expressed by the ocular surface epithelium. Prog. A. Barron, & M. B. McDonald (Eds.), The Cor-
the lacrimal ductules. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 70, Retin. Eye Res., 16, 81–98. nea (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–50). Boston: Butterworth-
241–245. Gipson, I. K., Spurr-Michaud, S. J., & Tisdale, A. Heinemann.
Bron, A. J., Benjamin, L., & Snibson, G. R. (1991). S. (1987). Anchoring fibrils form a complex net- Klyce, S. D., Maeda, N., & Byrd, T. J. (1998). Cor-
Meibomian gland disease. Classification and work in human and rabbit cornea. Invest. Oph- neal topography. In H. E. Kaufman, B. A. Bar-
grading of lid changes. Eye, 5, 395–411. thalmol. Vis. Sci., 28, 212–220. ron, & M. B. McDonald (Eds.), The Cornea (2nd
Bron, A. J., Tripathi, R. C., & Tripathi, B. (1997). Glasgow, B. J., Marshall, G., Gasymov, O. K., et al. ed.) (pp. 1055–1075). Boston: Butterworth-
Wolff ’s Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit (8th ed.). (2000). Tear lipocalins: potential scavengers for Heinemann.
London: Chapman and Hall. the corneal surface. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., Knop, E., & Knop, N. (2005). The role of eye-
Bron, A. J., Argüeso, P., Irkec, M., et al. (2015). 40, 3100–3107. associated lymphoid tissue in corneal immune
Clinical staining of the ocular surface: mecha- Gray, H., Bannister, L. H., Berry, M. M., et al. protection. J. Anat., 206, 271–285.
nisms and interpretations. Prog. Retin. Eye Res., (1995). Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis Knop, E., Knop, N., Zhivov, A., et al. (2011a). The
44, 36–61. of Medicine and Surgery (38th ed.). New York: lid wiper and muco-cutaneous junction anatomy
Butovich, I. A. (2013). Tear film lipids. Exp. Eye Churchill Livingstone. of the human eyelid margins: an in vivo confo-
Res., 117, 4–27. Guillon, J. P. (1998). Non-invasive Tearscope Plus cal and histological study. J. Anat., 218, 449–461.
Corfield, A. P., Carrington, S. D., Hicks, S. J., et al. routine for contact lens fitting. Cont. Lens Ante- Knop, E., Knop, N., Millar, T., et al. (2011b). The
(1997). Ocular mucins: purification, metabolism rior Eye, 21, S31–S40. international workshop on meibomian gland
and functions. Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 16, 627–656. Hassell, J. R., & Birk, D. E. (2010). The molecular basis dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on
Craig, J. P., & Tomlinson, A. (1997). Importance of of corneal transparency. Exp. Eye Res, 91, 326–335. anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the
the lipid layer in human tear film stability and Hodges, R. R., & Dartt, D. A. (2013). Tear film mu- meibomian gland. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
evaporation. Optom. Vis. Sci., 74, 8–13. cins: front line defenders of the ocular surface; 52, 1938–1978.
Dartt, D. A. (1992). Physiology of tear produc- comparison with airway and gastrointestinal Knop, N., Korb, D. R., Blackie, C. A., et al. (2012).
tion (Ch. 10, pp. 65–99). In M. A. Lemp, & R. tract mucins. Exp. Eye Res., 117, 62–78. The lid wiper contains goblet cells and goblet cell
Marquardt (Eds.), The Dry Eye: a Comprehensive Hodson, S. A. (1997). Corneal stromal swelling. crypts for ocular surface lubrication during the
Guide. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 16, 99–116. blink. Cornea, 31, 668–679.
Dartt, D. A. (2009). Neural regulation of lacrimal Hodson, S. A., & Miller, F. (1976). The bicarbonate ion Kronfeld, P. C., McHugh, S. L., & Polyak, S. L.
gland secretory processes: relevance in dry eye pump in the endothelium which regulates the hy- (1943). The Human Eye in Anatomical Transpar-
disease. Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 28, 155–177. dration of the rabbit cornea. J. Physiol., 263, 563–577. encies. Rochester: Bausch & Lomb.
Dilly, P. N. (1985). On the nature and the role of the Hodson, S. A., Guggenheim, J., Kaila, D., et al. Lander, T., Wirtschafter, J. D., & McLoon, L. K.
sub-surface vesicles in the outer epithelial cells of (1991). Anion pumps in ocular tissues. Biochem. (1996). Orbicularis oculi muscle fibres are rela-
the conjunctiva. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 69, 477–481. Soc. Trans., 19, 849–852. tively short and heterogeneous in length. Invest.
Doane, M. G. (1981). Blinking and the mechanics Hogan, M. J., Alvarado, J. A., & Weddell, J. E. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 37, 1732–1739.
of the lacrimal drainage system. Ophthalmology, (1971). Histology of the Human Eye. Philadel- Lavker, R. M., Tseng, S. C., & Sun, T. T. (2004). Cor-
88, 844–851. phia: Saunders. neal epithelial stem cells at the limbus: looking at
Doughty, M. J., & Zaman, M. L. (2000). Human Hollingsworth, J., Perez-Gomez, I., Mutalib, H. A., some old problems from a new angle. Exp. Eye.
corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular et al. (2001). A population study of the normal Res., 78(3), 433–446.
pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis cornea using an in vivo, slit-scanning confocal Lawrenson, J. G. (1997). Corneal sensitivity in
approach. Surv. Ophthalmol., 44, 367–408. microscope. Optom. Vis. Sci., 78, 706–711. health and disease. Ophthalmol. Physiol. Opt.,
Dua, H. S., & Azuara-Blanco, A. (2000). Limbal Holly, F. J., & Lemp, M. A. (1977). Tear physiology 17, S17–S22.
stem cells of the corneal epithelium. Surv. Oph- and dry eye. Surv. Ophthalmol., 22, 69–87. Lawrenson, J. G., & Ruskell, G. L. (1991). The struc-
thalmol., 44, 415–425. Jester, J. V., Murphy, C. J., Winkler, M., et al. (2013). ture of corpuscular nerve endings in the limbal
Dua, H. S., Faraj, L. A., Said, D. G., et al. (2013). Lessons in corneal structure and mechanics to conjunctiva of the human eye. J. Anat., 177,
Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre- guide the corneal surgeon. Ophthalmology, 120, 75–84.
Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology, 1715–1717. Lawrenson, J. G., Reid, A. R., & Allt, G. (1998).
120, 1778–1785. Jones, L. T. (1961). An anatomical approach to Corneal glycoconjugates: an ultrastructural
Efron, N. (1997). Contact lenses and corneal physi- problems of the eyelids and lacrimal apparatus. lectin-gold study. Histochem. J., 30, 51–60.
ology. Biol. Sci. Rev., 9, 29–31. Arch. Ophthalmol., 66, 111–124. Maitchouk, D. Y., Beuerman, R. W., Ohta, T., et al.
Efron, N., & Carney, L. G. (1979). Oxygen levels be- Jones, L. T. (1966). The lacrimal tear system and its (2000). Tear production after unilateral removal
neath the closed eyelid. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. treatment. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 62, 47–60. of the main lacrimal gland in squirrel monkeys.
Sci., 18, 93–95. Jordan, A., & Baum, J. (1980). Basic tear flow: does Arch. Ophthalmol., 118, 246–252.
Efron, N., Perez-Gomez, I., Mutalib, H. A., et al. it exist? Ophthalmology, 87, 920–930. Mantelli, F., & Argüesco, P. (2008). Functions of oc-
(2001). Confocal microscopy of the normal hu- Kessing, S. V. (1968). Mucus gland system of the ular surface mucins in health and disease. Curr.
man cornea. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye, 24, 16–24 conjunctiva: a quantitative normal anatomical Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 8, 477–483.
Erratum in: Cont. Lens Anterior Eye, 24, 83–85. study. Acta Ophthalmol, 95(Suppl.), 1–333. Marfurt, C. F., & Ellis, L. C. (1993). Immunohisto-
Ehlers, N. (1965). On the size of the conjunctival Khoramnia, R., Rabsilber, T. M., & Auffarth, G. U. chemical localisation of tyrosine hydroxylase in
sac. Acta Ophthalmol., 43, 205–210. (2007). Central and peripheral pachymetry mea- corneal nerves. J. Comp. Neurol., 336, 527–531.
Feng, Y., & Simpson, T. L. (2008). Corneal, limbal, surements according to age using the Pentacam Maurice, D. M. (1957). The structure and transpar-
and conjunctival epithelial thickness from opti- rotating Scheimpflug camera. J. Cataract Refract ency of the cornea. J. Physiol., 136, 263–286.
cal coherence tomography. Optom. Vis. Sci., 85, Surg., 33, 830–836. Maurice, D. M. (1984). The cornea and sclera. In
880–883. King-Smith, P. E., Fink, B. A., Fogt, N., et al. (2000). H. Davson (Ed.), The Eye. (3rd ed.) (Vol. 1B) (pp.
Freeman, R. D. (1972). Oxygen consumption by The thickness of the preocular tear film: evidence 1–158). Orlando: Academic Press.
the component layers of the cornea. J. Physiol., from reflection spectra. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. McClellan, K. A. (1997). Mucosal defence of the
225, 15–32. Sci., 41, 3348–3359. outer eye. Surv. Ophthalmol., 42, 233–346.
27.e1
27.e2 REFERENCES
McGill, J. I., Holgate, S. T., Church, M. K., et al. Prydal, J. J., Franc, F., Dilly, P. N., et al. (1998). Kerato- Stiemke, M. M., Watsky, M. A., Kangas, T. A., et al.
(1998). Allergic eye disease mechanisms. Br. J. cyte density and size in conscious humans by digital (1995). The establishment and maintenance of
Ophthalmol., 82, 1203–1214. image analysis of confocal images. Eye, 12, 337–342. corneal transparency. Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 14,
McKenzie, R. W., Jumblatt, J. E., & Jumblatt, M. M. Quantock, A. J., & Young, R. D. (2008). Development 109–140.
(2000). Quantification of MUC2 and MUC5AC of the corneal stroma, and the collagen–proteo- Stoeckelhuber, M., Stoeckelhuber, B. M., & Welsch,
transcripts in the human conjunctiva. Invest. glycan associations that help define its structure U. (2003). Human glands of Moll: histochemi-
Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 41, 703–708. and function. Dev. Dyn., 237, 2607–2621. cal and ultrastructural characterization of the
Meek, K. M., & Boote, C. (2009). The use of X-ray Riley, M. V. (1969). Glucose and oxygen utiliza- glands of Moll in the human eyelid. J. Invest.
scattering techniques to quantify the orientation tion by the rabbit cornea. Exp. Eye Res., 8, Dermatol., 121, 28–36.
and distribution of collagen in the corneal stro- 193–200. Sullivan, D. A., & Sato, E. H. (1994). Immunology
ma. Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 28, 369–392. Ruskell, G. L. (1975). Nerve terminals and epithe- of the lacrimal gland. In D. M. Albert, & F. A.
Meek, K. M., & Leonard, D. W. (1993). Ultrastruc- lial cell variety in the human lacrimal gland. Cell Jakobiec (Eds.), Principles and Practice of Oph-
ture of the corneal stroma: a comparative study. Tiss. Res., 158, 121–136. thalmology (pp. 479–486). Philadelphia: W.B.
Biophys. J., 64, 273–280. Ruskell, G. L., & Lawrenson, J. G. (1994). In- Saunders.
Møller-Pederson, T., & Ehlers, N. (1995). A three- nervation of the anterior segment. In M. Sullivan, D. A., Sullivan, B. D., Ullman, M. D., et al.
dimensional study of the human corneal kerato- Guillon, & M. Ruben (Eds.), Contact Lens (2000). Androgen influence on the meibomian
cyte density. Curr. Eye Res., 14, 459–464. Practice (pp. 225–237). London: Chapman gland. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 41, 3732–3742.
Nishida, T., & Tanaka, T. (1996). Extracellular ma- and Hall. Takahashi, Y., Watanabe, A., Matsuda, H., et al.
trix and growth factors in corneal wound heal- Sack, R. A., Tan, K. O., & Tan, A. (1992). Diurnal (2013). Anatomy of secretory glands in the eye-
ing. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol., 7, 2–11. tear cycle: evidence for a nocturnal inflamma- lid and conjunctiva: a photographic review. Oph-
Oliveira-Soto, L., & Efron, N. (2001). Morphology tory constitutive tear fluid. Invest. Ophthalmol. thal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 29(3), 215–219.
of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy. Vis. Sci., 33, 626–640. Tiffany, J. M. (1991). The viscosity of human tears.
Cornea, 20, 374–384. Saonanon, P. (2014). Update on Asian eyelid anat- Int. Ophthalmol. Clin., 15, 371–376.
Paulsen, F. P., Thale, A. B., Hallmann, U. J., et al. omy and clinical relevance. Curr. Opin. Ophthal- Tiffany, J. M. (1995). Physiological functions of the
(2000). The cavernous body of the human ef- mol., 25, 436–442. meibomian glands. Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 14, 47–74.
ferent tear ducts: function in tear outflow Scott, J. E. (1991). Proteoglycan: collagen interac- Tiffany, J. M. (1997). Tears and conjunctiva. In
mechanism. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 41, tions and corneal ultrastructure. Biochem. Soc. J. J. Harding (Ed.), Biochemistry of the Eye
965–970. Trans., 19, 877–881. (pp. 1–15). London: Chapman and Hall.
Pfister, R. R. (1973). The normal surface of the cor- Seifert, P., Spitznas, M., Koch, F., et al. (1993). The Tsubota, K. (1998). Tear dynamics and dry eye.
neal epithelium: a scanning electron microscopic architecture of human accessory lacrimal glands. Prog. Retin. Eye. Res., 17, 565–596.
study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 12, 654–668. Ger. J. Ophthalmol., 2, 444–454. Wilson, S. E. (2000). Role of apoptosis in wound
Pflugfelder, S. C. (1998). Tear fluid influence on the Shaheen, B. S., Bakir, M., & Jain, S. (2014). Corneal healing in the cornea. Cornea, 19, S7–S12.
ocular surface. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 438, 611–617. nerves in health and disease. Surv. Ophthalmol., Wilson, S. E., & Hong, J. W. (2000). Bowman’s layer
Pflugfelder, S. C., Liu, Z., Monroy, D., et al. 59, 263–285. structure and function. Critical or dispensable
(2000). Detection of sialomucin complex Sherrard, E., Novakovic, P., & Speedwell, L. (1987). to corneal function? A hypothesis. Cornea, 19,
(MUC4) in human ocular surface epithelium Age related changes of the corneal endothelium 417–420.
and tear fluid. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 41, and stroma as seen in vivo with the specular mi- Wirtschafter, J. D., Ketcham, J. M., Weinstock, R. J.,
1316–1326. croscope. Eye, 1, 197–203. et al. (1999). Mucocutaneous junction as a ma-
Prydal, J. J., Artal, P., Woon, H., et al. (1992). Study Srinivasan, S., Menzies, K., Sorbara, L., et al. (2012). jor source of replacement palpebral conjunctival
of human preocular tear film thickness and Infrared imaging of meibomian gland structure epithelial cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 40,
structure using interferometry. Invest. Ophthal- using a novel keratograph. Optom. Vis. Sci., 89, 3138–3146.
mol. Vis. Sci., 33, 2006–2011. 788–794.