You are on page 1of 11

Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/hazadv

Assessing the quality and heavy metal contamination of soil in tea gardens
around Magurchara gas blowout in Bangladesh using multivariate and soil
quality index methods
Mohammad Sadman Alam, Shetu Akter∗, Shahnaj Shemul, Tayabur Rashid Chowdhury,
Sabrin Ara
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology

a b s t r a c t

Explosive gas blowouts cause severe damage to gas-bearing rocks, structures, local tectonic settings, and the environment. Bangladesh has seen three high-profile
gas explosions. One of these is the Magurchara gas well blowout in Kamalganj union, Moulvibazar district, on June 14, 1997. Soil erosion was the most important
problem in the surrounding area, particularly the tea gardens. This study’s goal was to analyze the soil quality around the Magurchara gas well blowout in the
Kamalganj union. In this case, soil samples were collected (some near the well, others further away) and analyzed in the laboratory. Soil bulk density (BD), soil
porosity (SP), soil moisture content (SOM), pH, total nitrogen (TN), soil organic carbon (SOC), and soil organic matter (SOM) have been measured, and the results
show that in most places, the values do not fulfill the requirements for good tea plant growth. Heavy metal concentrations were evaluated using digestion and
an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). Interpolation was performed to depict the heavy metal distribution in the research area. Soil contamination was
assessed utilizing the geo-accumulation index, contamination factor, ecological risk, and enrichment factor. Multivariate statistical methods like principal component
analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) were utilized to assess soil quality. The results show that tea garden soils are contaminated, and the high quantity of Cd
in the research region implies severe contamination. The mean ecological risk index (Eri ) for five heavy metals was Cd > Pb > Cu > Ni > Zn, indicating a future
moderate risk to the environment. This study also demonstrated Cd to be a serious concern to the environment and tea plantation soils. The existing quality of the
soil surrounding the blowout is unfavorable for tea plant growth. Despite its flaws, this study will certainly help to understand the current state of tea garden soils
near the gas well blowout and lay the groundwork for future studies in this area.

1. Introduction well blowout, the Moulvibazar-1 (Magurchara) gas well blowout, and
the Chattak-2 (Tengratila) gas well blowout (Imam, 2005). The tea plant
Bangladesh is already a major player in the global energy industry (Camellia sinensis) is among the world’s most important perennial crops.
due to its large prospective natural gas deposits. Energy hub status for Some upland tea fields have been in production for two or three decades
the country has already been assigned. Bangladesh has imposed various or more. It has a long-life cycle, although yields begin to decline after
regulations since the early 1990s to encourage the private industry to two or three decades (Dang, 2002). Heavy metals in tea gardens and
prosper and encourage Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the oil and plants constitute a major environmental problem. Soil excels at absorb-
gas sector. This sector in Bangladesh has recently attracted several in- ing both natural and anthropogenic contaminants (Chakrabarti et al.,
ternational investors, and numerous International Oil Companies are 2004). In comparison to other types of contamination, soil heavy metal
currently involved (Imam, 2005; Rahman et al., 2010). In the oil and contamination is chronic, complex, concealed, irreversible, emotional,
gas business, one of the most serious concerns is the possibility of a and dangerous. Once heavy metals penetrate the soil environment, they
gas blowout, which has the potential to harm not only the surround- can accumulate in agricultural products and endanger the health of in-
ing environment but also geological formations that contain natural gas dividuals via food chains (Nejatolahi et al., 2014). All sorts of valuable
(Cao et al., 2018). During a "blowout," fluids such as water, gas, or oil trees, herbs, and crops were destroyed, as it was a part of a nearby tea es-
are forced to rise rapidly, violently, and uncontrollably from deep un- tate, which affected tea production following the 1997 Magurchara gas
derground to the surface, causing the drilling rig and accompanying explosion (Siddiqui, 2001). Many statistical techniques, including sta-
structures to explode and be destroyed. On three distinct occasions in tistical methodologies and geographic information systems (GIS), were
Bangladesh, the natural gas well blew up, including the Sylhet-1 gas employed to examine the fluctuation of heavy metals (Wang et al., 2011;


Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: mohammad45@student.sust.edu (M.S. Alam), shetuakter-gee@sust.edu (S. Akter), shahnaj10-gee@sust.edu (S. Shemul),
tayabur.chowdhury@student.sust.edu (T.R. Chowdhury), sabrin-cee@sust.edu (S. Ara).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100127
Received 4 April 2022; Received in revised form 3 July 2022; Accepted 10 July 2022
2772-4166/© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

Fig. 1. Map of the study area.

Yuan et al., 2010). Given the threat of gas blowout in the surrounding 2. Methodology
environment, this study uses multivariate analysis, assessed soil contam-
ination factor, and spatial interpolation analysis to ascertain the current 2.1. Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analysis
state of the quality of the tea garden soil surrounding the Magurchara
gas well blowout. On June 9th, 2021, eight soil samples were taken from tea gardens
around the Magurchara gas well blowout. Samples were gathered from 0
1.1. Outline about the geography of the Study Area to 0.2 m deep using a Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) corer. Handheld Global
Positioning System (GPS) was used to capture all the locations. Before
The tea gardens in the Kamalganj union, near Magurchara burst, the sampling, the polyethylene bags were cleaned with a 10% HNO3
were a consideration for the study (Fig. 1). Kamalganj union is located acid solution and distilled water. The study area had a large number
between latitudes of 24°18′26.7" and 24°23′21.1" north and longitudes of tea gardens; thus, sampling locations were chosen for this reason. At
of 91°46′29.5" and 91°51′53.3" east. In this place, the terrain is a little some sampling sites, samples were placed under the drip line of a tea
uneven. Sreemangal Upazila is in the west, whereas Madhabpur Upazila tree. It was carried out in clean, dust-free settings.
is located north of here. Phulbari Tea Estate is one of the largest tea Cutting rings were used to assess BD, Time-Domain Reflectometer
plantations in Bangladesh. A gas well blowout, on the other hand, can 100 (TDR) was used to assess SMC, and BD was used to assess SP.
severely impact tea plantation soil, reducing the productivity of the tea K2 Cr2 O7 oxidation was used to find out the amount of SOM. The mate-
plants. rial was heated in oil and treated by titration with 0.2 mol/L Fe2 SO4 to

2
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

determine its concentration. Meso Kelvin was used to find the TN con- Table 1
tent of the soil. With concentrated H2 SO4 and an accelerator, the sample Five degrees of Igeo .
was cooled in a variable temperature furnace, then distilled, and with a Igeo Class Soil Quality
0.01 mol/L HCl standard solution, the distillate was determined by titra-
Igeo ≤ 0 1 Uncontaminated
tion. Using a 1:5 soil-to-water solution, the pH of the soil was tested after
0 < Igeo < 1 2 Moderately contaminated
two hours of vigorous stirring. 1 < Igeo < 3 3 Moderately to Strongly contaminated
Using appropriate cathode lamps, AAS was used to assess Fe, Cu, 3 < Igeo < 5 4 Strongly contaminated
and Zn concentrations. The solutions were filtered using Whatman no. 5 < Igeo 5 Extremely contaminated
42 filtrate before being transferred to a conical flask for AAS analysis to
determine Ni, Pb, and Cd concentrations.
2.4. Geo-accumulation Index
2.2. Data Analysis
The soil heavy metal pollution was analyzed by geo-accumulation
index (Igeo ). Muller (1979) proposed this equation as a quantitative mea-
Analysis of data is a strategy that includes research and data modifi-
sure of contamination intensity in aquatic sediments. Soil pollution can
cation and is used to gather required information, conclude, and assist
also be evaluated using this method (Teng et al., 2002, Loska et al.,
in the right decision-making process (Xia and Gong, 2014). The results
2003). Equation no 2- is used to calculate Igeo .
are discussed to make the essential judgments when the data has been [ ( )]
correctly compiled. A summary of the findings or a visual representa- 𝐼𝑔𝑒𝑜 = 𝑙𝑜𝑔2 𝐶𝑛 ∕ 1.5 × 𝐵𝑛 (2)
tion of them can be provided at the end. For future investigations on Cn signifies the level of heavy metal observed in soil samples from
tea garden soils, Cao et al. (2018) suggested using multivariate analy- the research region and Bn symbolizes the matching metal’s background
sis, geographical variability analysis, and an ecological risk assessment value.
technique. Geo-accumulation index and principal component analysis 1.5 compensates for lithogenic influences in the backdrop content.
were proposed by Wei et al. (2011) for evaluating soil heavy metal pol- As stated in table 1, the Igeo is divided into five degrees (Martin, 2000).
lution.
2.5. Contamination Factor
2.3. Multivariate Analysis
A contamination factor (Cf ) can be used to quantify hazardous com-
Using multivariate data analysis, it is possible to estimate the num- pound contamination. The following formula can be used to determine
ber of people, entities, or items from a sample. However, it can be used the Cf .
for anything that involves speculation or conjecture (Morris, 1993). PCA 𝐶𝑓 = 𝐶𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑙 ∕𝐶𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 (3)
was used to highlight the diversity among variables and to determine
the extent to which heavy metal contamination has harmed the envi- In which Cf means the contamination factor calculated for specific
ronment. The PCA assessment was conducted using SPSS 23. metal content, Cmetal signifies the concentration of the element in every
individual soil sample and Cbackground is the background value of that
specific metal. When Cf < 1, it is considered as low Cf ; 1 ≤ Cf < 3 is
2.3.1. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
considered moderate Cf ; 3 ≤ Cf < 6 is referred to as considerable Cf , and
From the original principal component, PCA seeks to create addi-
Cf ≥ 6 is rated as very high Cf (Hakanson, 1980).
tional uncorrelated variables. For the greatest variance, new variables
are next to the headers. To capture the variety of data as compactly 2.6. Enrichment Factor
as feasible, PCA gives a good approach to discovering such records
(Sârbu and Pop, 2005). In Eq. 1, the PC is expressed as, Metal Enrichment Factors (EF) are indicators for determining the
𝑍𝑖𝑗 = 𝑎𝑖1 𝑥1𝑗 + 𝑎𝑖2 𝑥2𝑗 + 𝑎𝑖3 𝑥3𝑗 + … … … … + 𝑎𝑖𝑚 𝑥𝑚𝑗 (1) presence and degree of anthropogenic pollutant deposition on surface
soil (Barbieri, 2016). A standard metal concentration is used in the nor-
The component score is "z" the component loading is "a" the sam- malizing procedure. Due to their abundant availability and lack of con-
ple number is "j" the measured value of the variable is "x" and the total tact with other contaminants, Fe and Al are by far the most used ref-
number of variables is "m." To calculate eigenvalues and eigenvectors, erence elements (Sutherland, 2000). The following equation was being
a covariance or difference cross-product matrix can be used to outline used to estimate the enrichment factor:
the scattering of the different intended parameters. The principal com- ( ) ( )
𝐸𝐹 = 𝐶𝑛 ∕𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 ∕ 𝐶𝑛 ∕𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒
ponents are equal to the initial factors and eigenvectors added together
directly (Wunderlin et al., 2001). This study used the rotation approach Here, Cn and Cref are the metal and reference element (Fe) concen-
to identify the principal component to explain data variance. trations, respectively. Soil samples and background, respectively, are
represented by sample and baseline. The element iron (Fe) was used
2.3.2. Cluster Analysis (CA) to normalize two sets of values derived from the sample’s Metal-Fe ra-
CA is a combination of modeling techniques that assist in classifying tio and the background (Tippie, 1984; Salah et al., 2012). EF < 2 is
things under the features that are most fundamental to them (Alam et al., considered as deficiently to minimal enrichment in soil; 2 ≤ EF < 5 is
2021). It classifies things in such a way that each item in the cluster has considered as moderate enrichment in soil; 5 ≤ EF < 20 is referred to
the same specified decision standard as the rest. CA aims to organize significant enrichment in soil; 20 ≤ EF < 40 is rated as very high en-
data vectors into clusters while the true entities of the clusters are not richment in soil; EF > 40 indicates extremely high enrichment in soil
known (Wilks, 2011). In ungoverned machine learning, the most preva- (Sutherland, 2000).
lent method is hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HCA). Beginning
2.7. Potential ecological risk (RI) assessment
with a singleton vertex, it combines the present pair of the frequently
nearby vertex into another vertex, until only one final vertex remains,
RI can be utilized to evaluate the quality of the soil environment.
which contains the whole data set. An example is a dendrogram that
This equation was used to estimate the expected RI (Yuan et al., 2017,
shows strong comparability between any sample and the full dataset
Hakanson, 1980).
(McKenna, 2003). A dendrogram’s primary objective is to show the or- ∑ ∑
dering of clusters resulting from similar investigations (Everitt, 1993). 𝑅𝐼 = 𝐸𝑛𝑖 = 𝑇𝑟𝑖 × 𝐶𝑠𝑖 ∕𝐶𝑛𝑖

3
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

Fig. 2. Boxplot of physical parameters (left), chemical parameters (right).

Fig. 3. Spatial Distribution of Chemical Properties in the study area.

Fig. 4. Boxplot of Heavy Metals.

4
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

Fig. 5. Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in the study area.

Fig. 6. Scree plot of PCA.

where RI means the total potential ecological risk indices including all 3. Result and Discussion
heavy metals found; Er i signifies the potential ecological risk index of an
individual element; Cs i is the concentration of each element; Cn i is the 3.1. Physico-chemical characteristics of soils around Magurchara gas field
background value (mg·kg−1 ) of the element in A layer soil; and Tr i is the
toxicity response factor for each element, which expresses the harmful For tea garden soils near the Magurchara gas field, major Physico-
levels and the environmental reaction (Zn = 1; Cu and Ni = 5; Cd = 30) chemical properties such as BD, SMC, SP, pH, SOM, and TN were as-
(Yuan et al., 2017, Hakanson, 1980). sessed. Fig. 2 represents the boxplot diagram of the physical and chemi-

5
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

Fig. 7. Cluster Analysis.

Fig. 8. Minimum, Maximum, and mean Igeo .

cal parameters of soil. Ping et al. (2014) assessed soil compactness based criteria of proper growth of a tea garden. The appropriate range for soil
on BD and the BD of all the soil samples is below 1 g/cm3 . The aver- moisture is 20% to 60% for the proper growth of plants.
age BD of soil in the study area is 0.88 g/cm3 (Table 3) which does In the area that was investigated, the pH of the soil ranges anywhere
not indicate an ideal soil condition for the proper growth of tea plants from 4.4 to 6.6, with a mean value of 5.11 (Table 3). pH is relatively
as the ideal soil bulk density for high-yielding and high-quality tea gar- higher, which means soils are less acidic in the tea gardens that are very
dens should be ranged from 1.00 g/cm3 to 1.20 g/cm3 on the top and in close to the blowout. Although tea plants can grow in soil with a pH as
the core, it is ranged between 1.20 g/cm3 and 1.45 g/cm3 (Ping et al., low as 4.0, it is deemed undesirable without pH modification in the soil
2014). The average soil porosity in the study area is 72.21% (Table 3), with a pH only barely higher than 5.6. For commercial tea production,
SP favorable for the cultivation of Guizhou kingbird tea was 48% to soils with pH values of more than 6.5 are not suitable (Adhikary et al.,
56% (Zhang et al., 2013). Soils with porosity greater than 60% can be 2019). The fraction of the soil that comprises living organism tissue
excessively friable and may fail to maintain essential anchoring to tea in multiple levels of degradation is known as SOM. The presence of
plants. Soils in the study area have very high porosity, which may lead more than 2% SOM suggests high-yielding and high-quality tea gardens
to the leaching of nutrients. Again, SMC around the blowout area was (Han et al., 2002). The soil organic matter in the tea garden ranged
determined to be between 12.5% and 18.28% which does not meet the between 1.5 and 11.95 with an average value of 3.98 (Table 3). This in-

6
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

Fig. 9. Minimum, Maximum, and mean Cf .

Fig. 10. Minimum, Maximum, and mean EF.

dicates that most tea gardens around the blowout area can be classified which means that the growth of tea plants will not be satisfactory in
as rich soil that is good for growth and yield. Tea gardens can be af- these zones. (Fig. 4)
fected by the amount of total nitrogen in soils. Total nitrogen with more
than 0.1% indicates a high yield and good tea plant growth (Han et al., 3.2. Geostatistical analysis
2002). Total nitrogen varied from 0.08% to 0.46% with an average of
0.19 (Table 3). This indicates a healthy amount of total nitrogen in the Fig. 5 depicts the spatial pattern of heavy metals near the Magur-
soil for the proper growth of tea plants except in some areas. chara blowout in the Kamalganj union using the interpolation method.
Fig. 3 shows the variation of chemical properties in the study area. Mahmoudabadi et al. (2015) studied the geographic distribution of
The pH of tea garden soil close to the blowout is relatively high, while heavy metals in different land uses in Tehran. Kriging was found to be a
the pH value is less in stations S1, S6, and S8 as these samples are posi- viable strategy in the investigation of soil properties and heavy metals
tioned a little bit far away from the blowout. So, it indicates that the pH based on cross-validation results.
value decreases with the distance from the blowout area. The following The Zn content indicated a consistent distribution across the entire
figure shows most of the study area has less than 2% soil organic matter. area, with a comparatively large enrichment near stations S1, S4, S7, and
So, the area with the dark red zone is not suitable for tea plant growth S8. Cu and Pb concentrations were found to have opposing geograph-
in terms of poor soil organic matter. Total nitrogen with less than 0.1% ical patterns, with Cu concentrations increasing in the south, while Pb
in the soil is not a suitable condition for the growth of tea plants. The concentrations decreasing in the south half of the study area. Heavy
dark red zone shows the zone where total nitrogen has less than 0.1%, metals are concentrated in the dark green zone on the map. Cd distribu-

7
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

Fig. 11. Minimum, Maximum, and mean Er i .

Fig. 12. Potential Ecological Risk Index (RI).

tion showed an increasing trend from southwest to northeast, whereas Table 2


in most of the areas, the Ni distribution was uniform, with substantial Level of ecological risk.
enrichment. Er i RI Level of Ecological Risk

Er < 40
i
RI < 94 Low ecological risk
3.3. Statistical analysis of heavy metals in the tea garden around the
40 ≤ Er i ≤ 80 94 ≤ RI ≤ 188 Moderate ecological risk
Magurchara blowout 80 ≤ Er i ≤ 160 188 ≤ RI ≤ 376 Considerable ecological risk
Er i ≥ 160 RI ≥ 376 Very high ecological risk
3.3.1. Descriptive statistics
The fundamental statistical data of physicochemical characteristics
and heavy metals in tea garden soil are presented in Table 3. When com- the K-S test that Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb in tea garden soils exhibited typical
pared to the average value of the background, the mean concentrations distribution, but Ni showed aberrant distribution. The skewness which
of Zn, Cu, Ni, and Pb are all much lower, but the overall mean concentra- is related to the normal distribution corroborated this result since the
tion of Cd is substantially higher. In general, the coefficient of variation skewness value of Ni is smaller than -1 (Cao et al., 2018). The skewness
(CV) can be divided into three categories: CV < 10% indicates mild vari- of Cd is also less than -1, so the concentration of Cd is also skewed.
ability, 10% <CV <100% defines moderate variability, and CV>100%
denotes significant variability (Guo et al., 2018; Sinex & Wright, 1988). 3.3.2. Pearson Correlation analysis
The CV of heavy metals surrounding the Magurchara gas blowout exhib- The association between factors such as pH, soil organic matter, to-
ited moderate variability in order Cd > Ni > Cu > Pb > Zn, mostly due tal nitrogen, and heavy metals was assessed using Pearson correlation
to varied environmental circumstances and soil properties. Another test coefficients. Alam et al. (2021) carried out a correlation analysis to de-
called Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) normality test has been performed to termine the interrelationship between the affecting variables. They are
analyze the type of distribution (Cao et al., 2018). It is observed from useful to acknowledge the key determinants along with the origins of

8
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

Table 3
SMC, SP, BD, SOM, TN, concentration of heavy metals (mg/kg) and background value (mg/kg).

Parameters SMC BD SP pH SOM TN Zn Cu Ni Cd Pb

Min 12.5 0.67 67.32 4.40 1.50 0.08 4.51 0.47 0.16 0.02 4.88
Max 26.2 1.07 74.45 6.60 11.95 0.48 6.83 0.96 2.17 0.14 8.13
Mean 21.77 0.88 72.28 5.11 3.97 0.18 5.74 0.72 1.68 0.09 6.27
Standard Deviation 5.09 0.12 2.33 0.81 3.58 0.13 0.77 0.19 0.71 0.05 1.15
C.V(%) 23.38 13.64 3.22 15.85 90.18 72.22 13.41 26.39 42.26 53.54 18.34
Skewness -1.09 -0.23 -1.55 1.34 1.99 2.04 -0.38 -0.02 -1.81 -1.08 0.49
K-S 0.04 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.20 0.20
Backgrou-nd Content (Liu, 1995) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51.50 9.70 9.0 0.05 46.80
World Surface Rock Average (Martin and Meybeck, 1979). N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 127 32 49 0.2 16

N/A- Not Available.

Table 4
Pearson Correlation coefficients of heavy metals.

pH Soil Organic Matter Total Nitrogen Zn Cu Cd Ni Pb

pH 1 .
Soil Organic Matter .310 1
Total Nitrogen .337 .001 1
Zn .396 .239 .257 1
Cu .224 .050 .051 .477 1
Cd .314 .027 .022 .384 .024 1
Ni .456 .001 .001 .386 .060 .001 1
Pb .126 .314 .310 .498 .374 .335 .399 1

chemical substances since they give an excellent technique to highlight ings in PC1. This suggested that this element may be from a natural
the correlations between many variables (Li et al., 2013). A substantial source.
positive and negative linear correlation is indicated by values between
0.3 and 0.7 and -0.3 and -0.7 respectively (Ratner, 2013). 3.3.4. Cluster Analysis of Heavy metals
In this study, the pH had a moderate positive relationship with Ni, The similarity between the sampling sites was assessed using cluster
Zn, and Cd implying that these heavy metals tend to aggregate as the pH analysis. This strategy is best for demonstrating relationships among
rises. Table 4 shows that Zn has a substantial positive correlation with variables (Le Maitre, 1982). Fig. 7 illustrates the dendrogram of CA
other heavy metals, with the largest correlations identified between the based on their tea garden soil quality. Clustering is used to look for
elemental pairings Zn-Pb, and Zn-Cu. Pb-Cu, Pb-Cd Pb-Ni also had a groups or clusters of similar samples. This dendrogram suggests that sta-
substantial positive association as well. These significant correlations tion S3 and S5 are the most related objects as the height of the link that
are implying similar sources and similar mechanisms of heavy metal unites them are the smallest. The following similar identical samples are
accumulation. S4 and S6. Station S3, S4, S5, and S6 were quite close to the Magurchara
blowout, hence these samples are showing comparable characteristics
3.3.3. Principal component analysis (PCA) in cluster analysis. Station S1, S2, and S8 revealed comparable char-
PCA was used to figure out what factors were contributing to the acteristics, as they are positioned in the same cluster. But these three
deterioration in the soil’s quality. It denotes the relationship between samples do not show much similarity with other samples as the height
variables and components. Two main factors with eigenvalues of more of the connection that unites them is the biggest. A substantial variance
than one were identified during PCA. Table 5 explains the key com- among these samples may be detected in the dendrogram.
ponents of tea garden soil whose eigenvalue is greater than 1. Factor
loadings have been classified as ‘strong’, ‘moderate,’ and ’weak’ based 3.4. Assessment of soil heavy metals contamination
on absolute loading levels of more than 0.75, 0.50–0.75, and 0.30–0.50,
respectively. (Liu et al., 2003). PCA value greater than one is regarded as Igeo can evaluate the individual levels of pollution of different com-
significant (Shrestha and Kazama, 2007). The rotation method was used ponents in soil. Fig. 8 shows that the Igeo ranges for heavy metals in all
in this work to extract principal components to explain data variation. samples taken were between 0 and 1. That means the soil of the tea gar-
Fig. 6 illustrates the scree plot of eigenvalue, and a rapid fall was noted den around the blowout is moderately contaminated. Cd has the highest
after reaching eigenvalue 1. In a scree plot, the amount of variation that Igeo among all the heavy metals with 0.602 and Ni has the lowest with
is captured by each primary component from the data is displayed. 0.004. The mean Igeo is shown in Fig. 8 Cd has the highest mean value
In table 5, which illustrates PCs of tea garden soils, PC1 represents with 0.417 and Zn has the lowest mean value with 0.027. These heavy
50.304% of the total variance. In PC1, Cu, Cd, and Ni have high posi- metals may have gotten into the environment as a result of prior land
tive loadings among all the heavy metals examined in the study, hence use, mining, and gas explosions, among other things.
PC1 is strongly associated with Cu, Cd, and Ni, whereas Pb has lesser Fig. 9 shows that the Cf value for Cd in most of the tea gardens
than weak negative loadings. The second principal component (PC2) ranges between 1≤ Cf ≤ 3. This means the Cd in the tea garden soil
is closely related to Zn which has high positive loadings and PC2 con- is moderately contaminated. The Cf value for Cd in some parts of the
tributed 20.678% of the overall variance. tea garden is more than 3, which indicates a considerable amount of
PCA can be used to determine sources of contamination in multivari- contamination in soil. The Cf value for Cu, Zn, Ni, and Pb is less than
ate statistical analysis (Facchinelli et al., 2001). In PC1, Cu, Cd, and Ni 1, which means other heavy metals are low-contaminated in soil based
are positively related, this indicated that components are mostly pro- on the contamination factor. Higher Cf values show that anthropogenic
duced from anthropogenic sources, such as agriculture, mining, atmo- contaminants play a greater role, whereas lower Cf values highlight the
spheric deposition of combustion emissions, and other activities. Only geological distribution of components in the soil, i.e., degradation of
Zn has strong positive loadings in PC2 but showed weak negative load- bedrock (Kabata-Pendias, 2000). High Cf values of Cd in soil may be

9
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

Fig. 13. Potential Ecological Risk Indices (RI)


of the Study Area.

attributable to fertilizer use in tea gardens and earlier gas well blowouts, Table 5
but low Cf values of other examined heavy metals may be attributable PCA of heavy metals.
to geological processes. Parameters PC1 PC2
Fig 10 indicates that Zn, Cu, and Ni have minimal enrichment in
Zn 0.015 0.992
the soil as the EF value is less than 2. The study area is abundant with
Cu 0.832 -0.039
Cd and Pb. Moderate and significant enrichment was reported for Cd in Cd 0.964 0.106
tea garden soils around Magurchara blowout. The maximum EF factor Ni 0.910 -0.162
for Cd is 23.32, which indicates a high enrichment of Cd in soil. In this Pb -0.257 -0.103
Eigenvalue 2.515 1.034
study, Pb has the highest EF value 25.82, which is very close to the
Cumulative Variance (%) 50.304 70.981
blowout. Significant enrichment was found in most tea garden soils for Total Variance (%) 50.304 20.678
Pb which has high enrichment in soil. It is also observed from the figure
that Cu has the lowest enrichment in tea garden soil as the mean EF of
Cu is 0.73 which is lower than other heavy metals.
considerable ecological risk as the value is between 40-80, and 80-160
3.5. Potential ecological risk assessment of tea garden soils respectively. Cao et al. (2018) carried out a study in southeast China to
assess the tea garden soils, in which Cd reached the level of moderate
Potential ecological risk assessments were created to measure con- ecological risk. Fig 11 shows the Er i of individual heavy metals, and it
temporaneous pollution levels as well as the environment’s response to is evident that Cd in tea garden soil is a major threat to ecology.
pollution. Fig. 11 and Fig. 12 represent the ecological risk and risk in- From the RI value (Fig. 12), it is observed that all the soil samples
dex, respectively. In this figure, it is observed that all the heavy metals are of a low degree of ecological risk as the RI value is ranged less than
except Cd have low ecological risk as the value of Er i is less than 40. Er i 94 (Table 2). But in stations S7 and S8, the RI value is very close to 94.
of Cd showed some variation. The Er i value of Cd in some areas shows So, it can be said that soils in stations S7 and S8 are close to a moderate
low ecological risk, while in most of the areas Er i shows moderate and degree of ecological risk. The high-risk index value means more towards

10
M.S. Alam, S. Akter, S. Shemul et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 7 (2022) 100127

the ecological risk. Fig. 13 shows the spatial pattern of the ecological risk Le Maitre, R.W., 1982. Numerical Petrology. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Am-
index around the Magurchara gas blowout area. The dark green zones sterdam.
Li, X., Liu, L., Wang, Y., Luo, G., Chen, X., Yang, X., Hall, M.H.P., Guo, R.,
are the ones that are close to the value of moderate risk to ecology. This Wang, H., Cui, J., He, X., 2013. Heavy metal contamination of urban soil in
indicated that the southwest part of the study area is a threat to ecology an old industrial city (Shenyang) in Northeast China. Geoderma 192 (1), 50–58.
as the RI value is much higher. This may also impact the growth of tea doi:10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2012.08.011.
Liu, C.W., Lin, K.H., Kuo, Y.M., 2003. Application of factor analysis in the assessment of
plants. groundwater quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Sci. Total Environ. 313
(1–3), 77–89. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00683-6.
4. Conclusions Loska, K., Wiechuła, D., Barska, B., Cebula, E., Chojnecka, A., 2003. Assessment of Arsenic
Enrichment of Cultivated Soils in Southern Poland. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 12 (2).
Mahmoudabadi, E., Sarmadian, F., Nazary Moghaddam, R., 2015. Spatial distribution of
This investigation has shown that the tea garden soil around Magur- soil heavy metals in different land uses of an industrial area of Tehran (Iran). Int. J.
chara blowout is not very appropriate for the cultivation of tea plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12 (10), 3283–3298. doi:10.1007/s13762-015-0808-z.
Martin, C.W., 2000. Heavy metal trends in floodplain sediments and valley fill, River Lahn,
The physical and chemical qualities of soil do not reach the norm of
Germany. Catena 39 (1), 53–68. doi:10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00080-6.
high-yielding and high-quality tea gardens. Moreover, the study has in- Martin, J.M., Meybeck, M., 1979. Elemental mass-balance of material carried by major
dicated that heavy metal contamination of soil is a matter of environ- world rivers. Mar. Chem. 7 (3), 173–206. doi:10.1016/0304-4203(79)90039-2.
mental concern. Among all the heavy metals examined in this study, Cd McKenna, J.E., 2003. An enhanced cluster analysis program with bootstrap significance
testing for ecological community analysis. Environ. Model. Softw. 18 (3), 205–220.
in the soil is a serious concern for the tea garden. The concentration doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(02)00094-4.
of Cd demonstrates moderate to substantial contamination in the study Morris, J.D., 1993. Applied Multivariate Data Analysis, Volume II: Categorical and Multi-
area. The Er i of heavy metals decreased as follows: Cd > Pb > Cu > Ni > variate Methods. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 88 (424), 1472–1474.
Nejatolahi, M., Mortazavi, S., Ildoromi, A., 2014. Levels of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd in the leaves
Zn, with Cd contamination levels ranging from moderate to severe eco- of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) and in the soil of Gilan and Mazandaran farms of
logical damage, indicating that soil quality improvement is necessary. Iran. J. Food Measure. Character. 8 (4), 277–282. doi:10.1007/s11694-014-9186-3.
The integrated Risk Index (RI) suggests that the tea garden soils near Ping, X., Liyun, Y., Moucheng, L., Fei, P., 2014. Soil Characteristics and Nutrients in Dif-
ferent Tea Garden Types in Fujian Province, China. J. Resour. Ecol. 5 (4), 356–363.
the blowout are extremely close to the moderate ecological risk. Thus, doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2014.04.011.
from these data, it can be stated that the impact of a blowout is still Rahman, M.M., Saha, S.K., Rahman, M.Z., 2010. Impact assessment of environmental con-
apparent in the tea garden soil. Modern treatment technology should be sequences on a blowout at Chhatak-2 (Tengratila) gas field, Bangladesh. Bangladesh
J. Environ. Res. 8, 15–22.
purchased by competent authorities to mitigate the soil quality degra-
Ratner, B., 2013. The correlation coefficient: Definition. DM Stat-1 Articles 49, 50.
dation of the tea garden near the blowout. Salah, E.A.M., Zaidan, T.A., Al-Rawi, A.S., 2012. Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution in
the Sediments of Euphrates River, Iraq. J. Water Resour. Prot. 04 (12), 1009–1023.
doi:10.4236/jwarp.2012.412117.
Declaration of Competing Interest
Sârbu, C., Pop, H.F., 2005. Principal component analysis versus fuzzy principal component
analysis: A case study: the quality of danube water (1985–1996). Talanta 65 (5),
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial 1215–1220. doi:10.1016/J.TALANTA.2004.08.047.
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence Shrestha, S., Kazama, F., 2007. Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate
statistical techniques: A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environ. Model.
the work reported in this paper. Softw. 22 (4), 464–475. doi:10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2006.02.001.
Siddiqui, J., 2001. Environmental non-accountability in Bangladesh?: The striking case
References of the Magurchara gas field disaster. Soc. Environ. Account. J. 21 (2), 12–13.
doi:10.1080/0969160X.2001.9651658.
Adhikary, S., Khan, Md.Z., Arobe, S., Dey, S., Billah, S.M., 2019. Soil Chemical Analy- Sinex, S.A., Wright, D.A., 1988. Distribution of trace metals in the sedi-
sis of Kazi and Kazi Organic Tea Garden and Compared to Ordinary Tea Gardens of ments and biota of Chesapeake Bay. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 19 (9), 425–431.
Bangladesh. Open J. Soil Sci. 09 (06), 91–102. doi:10.4236/ojss.2019.96006. doi:10.1016/0025-326X(88)90397-9.
Alam, R., Ahmed, Z., Seefat, S.M., Nahin, K.T.K., 2021. Assessment of surface water quality Sutherland, R.A., 2000. Bed sediment-associated trace metals in an urban stream. Cases
around a landfill using multivariate statistical method, Sylhet, Bangladesh. Environ. and solutions Environmental Geology, 39. Springer-Verlag, Oahu, Hawaii.
Nanotech. Monitor. Manage. 15. doi:10.1016/j.enmm.2020.100422. Teng, Y.G., Tuo, X.G., Zhang, C.J., 2002. Applying geo-accumulation index to assess heavy
Barbieri, M., 2016. The Importance of Enrichment Factor (EF) and Geoaccumula- metal pollution in sediment: influence of different geochemical background. Environ.
tion Index (Igeo) to Evaluate the Soil Contamination. J. Geol. Geophys. 5 (1). Sci. Technol. 2, 7–9.
doi:10.4172/2381-8719.1000237. Tippie, V.K., 1984. An environmental characterization of chesapeake
Cao, H.L., Cai, F.Y., Jiao, W.bin, Liu, C., Zhang, N., Qiu, H.Y., Rensing, C., Lü, J., 2018. bay and a framework for action. The Estuary As a Filter 467–487.
Assessment of tea garden soils at An’xi County in southeast China reveals a mild doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-405070-9.50028-1.
threat from contamination of potentially harmful elements. R. Soc. Open Sci. (8) 5. Wang, X., ZHANG, Z.L., WANG, M.X., ZHANG, L., DAI, J.R., 2011. Environmental As-
doi:10.1098/rsos.180050. sessment of Heavy Metals in Surface Soil of Tea Plantations in Rizhao City. Bull. Soil
Chakrabarti, K., Sinha, N.P., Chakraborty, A., Bhattacharyya, P., 2004. Influence of soil Water Conserv. 31 (3), 219–224.
properties on urease activity under different agro-ecosystems. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. Wei, Z., Wang, D., Zhou, H., Qi, Z., 2011. Assessment of soil heavy metal pollution with
50, 477–483. doi:10.1080/03650340410001692998. Principal component analysis and Geoaccumulation index. Proced. Environ. Sci. 10
Dang, M. van. (2002). Effects of tea cultivation on soil quality in the northern mountainous (PART C), 1946–1952. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2011.09.305.
zone, Vietnam. Wilks, D.S., 2011. Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 100. Academic press.
Everitt, B., 1993. Cluster Analysis, third ed Edward Arnold, London. Wunderlin, D.A., María Del Pilar, D., María Valeria, A., Fabiana, P.S., Cecilia, H.A.,
Facchinelli, A., Sacchi, E., Mallen, L., 2001. Multivariate statistical and GIS-based ap- María De Los Ángeles, B., 2001. Pattern Recognition Techniques for the Eval-
proach to identify heavy metal sources in soils. Environ. Pollut. 114 (3), 313–324. uation of Spatial and Temporal Variations in Water Quality. A Case Study:
doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00243-8. Suquı́a River Basin (Córdoba–Argentina). Water Res. 35 (12), 2881–2894.
M, G., 1979. Schwermettalle in den sedimenten des Rheins- doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00592-3.
Veranderungen seit 1971. Umschau Wissensch Tech 79, 778–783. Xia, B.S., Gong, P., 2014. Review of business intelligence through data analysis. Bench-
https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573950400258278528.bib?lang=en. marking 21 (2), 300–311. doi:10.1108/BIJ-08-2012-0050.
Guo, X., Zuo, R., Meng, L., Wang, J., Teng, Y., Liu, X., Chen, M., 2018. Seasonal and Yuan, X., Zhao, W., Ren, Y., Wang, X., 2010. Spatial distribution characteristic of Cr in
spatial variability of anthropogenic and natural factors influencing groundwater tea plantation soil of Meitan county. Guizhou Agricult. Sci. (5) 125–127.
quality based on source apportionment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health (2) 15. Yuan, Z., Yao, J., Wang, F., Guo, Z., Dong, Z., Chen, F., Hu, Y., Sunahara, G., 2017.
doi:10.3390/ijerph15020279. Potentially toxic trace element contamination, sources, and pollution assessment
Hakanson, L., 1980. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control.a sedimentolog- in farmlands, Bijie City, southwestern China. Environ. Monit. Assess. (1) 189.
ical approach. Water Res. 14 (8), 975–1001. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8. doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5755-8.
Han, W.Y., Ruan, J.Y., Lin, Z., 2002. Tea garden soil nutrition main obstacle factors and Zhang, J.C., Zhang, Q.H., Lin, S.X., 2013. Different ecological regions in Guizhou king
fertilizer series of tea tree. J. Tea Sci. 22 (1), 70–74. bird tea and tea quality soil characteristics correlation studies. Guangdong Agricult.
Imam B. (2005). Energy resources of Bangladesh: university grants commission of Sci. 40 (8), 60–63.
Bangladesh.
Kabata-Pendias, A. (2000). Trace Elements in Soils and Plants Third Edition.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039900

11

You might also like