Gold Jewelry for Your

Style
Simba Jewels

The road to competition

Opinio n Beelam Ramzan January 18, 2023

Wit h nearly t wo years in power, t he Biden Administ rat ion shows no sign of changing America’s confront at ional
post ure towards China. Even t hough all eyes were set on a policy of engagement ,...

With nearly two years in power, the Biden Administration shows no sign of changing
America’s confrontational posture towards China. Even though all eyes were set on a
policy of engagement, intense competition between the two arch rivals has ended up
increasing points of friction.

Trade sanctions, technology war, export control, decoupling, and rupturing supply chains
underscore the tense China-US relations that severely undermine the global economy
and upend the norms of international trade.

Biden’s main concern, like his predecessor Trump, is cyber security, national security and
protecting the US economy by maintaining American supremacy vis-a-vis the dominant
position of an assertive China. Biden has taken several coercive measures; he continues
to raise tariff walls on trade, sanction Chinese officials, impose visa restrictions for
Chinese students and ban imports from Xinjiang.

He has virtually declared a technology war on China. His stringent curbs on tech exports
are intended to prohibit Chinese companies from procuring advanced semiconductors
from the US, and anywhere in the world made with American expertise. He has
blacklisted a number of Chinese tech companies, including Huawei, on grounds of
national security.

Biden signed the Chips and Science Act last year, which includes $52 billion in incentives
and subsidies to boost semiconductor manufacturing in the US, and the US Innovation
and Competition Act 2021 to increase domestic funding for the sensitive technology.
The aim is to thwart China’s technological development that could bolster its capabilities
inShare
the military and cyber spheres. Next St ory >>>
The US is seeking allies to wage this war, and is looking at Japan, South Korea, Taiwan
and Singapore. But these Asian countries are reluctant partners because they have deep
economic relations with China, and they do not want to fracture them. About 60 per cent
of chips made in Taiwan are sold to China; Japan exports almost one-third of its total
chips to China. But both countries rely heavily on American companies for business and
on the US which acts as a guarantor of security in the Indo-Pacific region, which is why
they may have little choice but to comply with America’s export control regime and cut
sales of advanced chips to China.

Optimists suggest that the complete decoupling of supply chains in tech trade between
Chinese and American spheres may not be realistic, given the fact that both are
economically interdependent; a majority of iPhones are still produced in China.

The major flashpoint in China-US tensions occurred with Speaker of the US House of
Representative Nancy Pelosi’s Taiwan visit last August. The visit was seen as America’s
solid support to ‘democratic’ Taiwan in the face of ‘autocratic’ China. China denounced
US action and regarded the visit as a major provocation and ‘crossing the red line’. It
reacted assertively by waging formidable military drills, including firing conventional
missiles around Taiwan, which it considers its own territory.

The US considers China as its ‘biggest geopolitical challenge’, which has the capacity to
“tilt the global playing field to its benefit”. China has responded to US criticism of its
statecraft by turning to ‘wolf warrior’ diplomacy — use of assertive language and actions
to safeguard China’s interests and damage America’s image. This type of competition
between two powerful countries resembles the pattern of the cold-war competition
between the US and the erstwhile Soviet Union in shaming adversaries by drawing
attention to their abuses. Another way of competing is outbidding each other and
bestowing economic benefits to countries to win them over.

For instance, China has exerted great influence in the South Pacific in areas of maritime,
cyber security and economic development by drawing countries close to Beijing’s orbit.
To counter China’s moves, the US and its allies including Australia, Japan, New Zealand
and the UK has launched a scheme called Partners in the Blue Pacific, which aims to help
small countries in the region tackle issues from climate change to illegal fishing and from
providing vaccines to creating educational opportunities. These initiatives are an
attempt to nullify China’s increasing influence in the region and arrest the declining US
presence.

Share Next St ory >>>

As a countermeasure to China’s Belt and Road Initiative — which is a multitrillion-dollar
infrastructure and investment project that has encouraged global trade and industrial
activities in Greece, Pakistan, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Africa, Latin America and elsewhere – the
US along with the G-7 countries has established the Partnership for Global Infrastructure
and Investment. It plans to offer $200 billion to finance global infrastructure projects in
developing countries. The fierce competition between the rival hierarchies has
contributed to squeeze benefits by the smaller countries.

Not only do the US and China compete, they also cooperate with other countries when
face shared risk. And this brings rewards for smaller countries. In the last climate
conference (COP27), developed countries announced a climate compensation fund for
poor countries, channelling billions of dollars into developing green technology at home
and financing it abroad. This will reduce the cost of green technology by integrating
supply chains and allowing path for progress.

In the backdrop of a global recession, the pandemic outbreak, and the ongoing Ukraine
war, it is important to prevent competition from drifting into conflict and find ways to
work together on urgent global issues. Whether or not the last Xi-Biden meeting that
happened at the G-20 summit in Bali, Indonesia, in November last year will stabilize the
perilous ties is yet to be seen.

There is a tacit understanding that managing China-US relations responsibly has far-
reaching consequences for the global economy, international peace and security, and
world trade.

The writer holds an LLM degree in international economic law from the University of
Warwick. She can be reached at: beelam_ ramzanyahoo.com

Share Next St ory >>>