You are on page 1of 6

Table Ronde LBP

2021-10-11
Immunotherapy: a revolution for the 12,5%
Immune Checkpoint Blockade (ICB) Yet only 12,46% of patients benefit
is a revolution in cancer treatment from ICB treatment

US 2018 ICB response rates


100%

Responding
90%

Eligible
80%

1st Challenge
70%

2nd Challenge
60%

50%

Non Responding
40%

Non Eligible
30%

20%

10%

0%
Cancer Patients Eligible Cancer Patients
Pooled, pan-cancer, pan-ICB data from Haslam & Prasad, JAMA Netw Open. 2019
Confidential - do not distribute 2
ICBs need an immune response
ICB lifts tumor-led inhibition of anti- Consequence: need for a pre-
cancer immune response existing immune response

Lymphocyte Lymphocyte

PD1
ICB
? PD1

Tumor cell Tumor cell Tumor cell Tumor cell

Confidential - do not distribute 3


CRMs induce an immune response
Caloric Restriction Mimetics (CRM) This effect is mediated by regulatory
synergize with chemotherapy in a CD8-
dependent fashion T-cell depletion in the tumor bed

⚫ PBS ◆ CRM + MTX


◼ MTX ◆ CRM + MTX + αCD4
◆ CRM ⚫ CRM + MTX + αCD8 PBS | CRM | MTX | CRM +
MTX

Confidential - do not distribute 4


Proof of concept Chemo +
Ctrl
CRM019
CRM019 induces complete
ICB response in an ICB- Chemo Chemo
+ ICB
resistant model

Tumor volume (mm3)


Syngeneic immunocompetent model, strain
MCA 205 (resistant against immunotherapies), Triple combination
chemotherapy : mitoxantrone, ICB: anti PD1,
n>8/group Chemo + ICB +
CRM019
p<0,001

CRM + ICI
Chimio Patented 2018
Time (days)

Confidential - do not distribute 5


Thank you!
Erwan ERIAU
erwan@eriau.eu
(+33) (0)6 74 32 76 90

You might also like