This document summarizes research on involving couples and families in substance abuse treatment. It discusses common hypotheses for how families contribute to addiction, such as the disturbed spouse hypothesis. However, research does not support that family members are inherently disturbed. The document also describes the family adjustment model, which views family behaviors as normal coping responses to addiction. Treatment approaches discussed include behavioral couples therapy, contingency management, and various evidence-based family therapies for adolescents.
This document summarizes research on involving couples and families in substance abuse treatment. It discusses common hypotheses for how families contribute to addiction, such as the disturbed spouse hypothesis. However, research does not support that family members are inherently disturbed. The document also describes the family adjustment model, which views family behaviors as normal coping responses to addiction. Treatment approaches discussed include behavioral couples therapy, contingency management, and various evidence-based family therapies for adolescents.
This document summarizes research on involving couples and families in substance abuse treatment. It discusses common hypotheses for how families contribute to addiction, such as the disturbed spouse hypothesis. However, research does not support that family members are inherently disturbed. The document also describes the family adjustment model, which views family behaviors as normal coping responses to addiction. Treatment approaches discussed include behavioral couples therapy, contingency management, and various evidence-based family therapies for adolescents.
Psychological
Treatment
for
Substance
Abuse
Week
9
Recovery
and
RelaFonships
• “Sobriety
may
be
harmful
to
your
relaFonships…
and
your
relaFonships
may
be
harmful
to
your
ability
to
maintain
sobriety.”
Family
and
AddicFon
Hypotheses
• Disturbed
Spouse
Hypothesis
• Disturbed
Family
Hypothesis
• Codependence
Hypothesis
Family
and
AddicFon
Hypotheses
• No
scienFfic
evidence
that
there
is
something
wrong
with
spouses
or
family
members
of
people
with
addicFon.
Family
Adjustment
Model
• Stress-‐coping
Hypothesis:
SO
or
family
members
demonstrate
a
normal
adjusFve
reacFon
to
the
addicFve
behavior
of
their
loved
one.
– Behaviors
may
include:
buying
alcohol
or
drugs,
protecFng
loved
one
from
negaFve
consequences.
How
can
family
members
help?
• Reinforce
sobriety
à
Learn
to
disFnguish
between
behaviors
that
favor
recovery
and
those
that
favor
conFnued
use
and
addicFon.
– Enabling
behavior
vs.
posiFve
reinforcement
for
not
using
and
alternaFves
to
using
– Al-‐Anon
à
“loving
detachment”
Behavioral
Couples
Therapy
• Designed
for
married
or
cohabitaFng
couples
in
which
one
person
is
seeking
help
for
addicFon.
• 12-‐20
weekly
sessions
over
3-‐6
months
• Can
be
adjunct
to
individual
therapy
• Couples
are
married
or
cohabitaFng
for
at
least
1
year
BCT:
Goals
• Build
moFvaFon
for
engagement
and
discuss
approach
with
couple.
• Achieve
and
maintain
absFnence.
• Have
couple
improve
quality
of
relaFonship.
• Maintenance
plan
for
conFnuing
recovery.
Behavioral
Couples
Therapy
1. Substance-‐focused
intervenFons
– Daily
recovery
contract
– FuncFonal
analysis
– Self-‐help
– Coping
skills
2.
RelaFonship-‐focused
intervenFons
– Increasing
posiFve
behaviors
– Strengthening
communicaFon
skills
Family
Treatment
for
Adolescents
• MulFsystemic
Therapy
(MST):
family
and
community-‐based
treatment
for
adolescents
involved
in
criminal
jusFce
system
• Brief
Strategic
Family
Therapy
(BSFT):
manualized
brief
intervenFon
(8-‐24
sessions)
to
treat
behavioral
problems
and
substance
abuse.
• MulFdimensional
Family
Therapy
(MDFT):
family-‐ based
approach;
targets
mulFple
pathways
SAMSHA’s
NaFonal
Registry
of
Evidence-‐based
programs
and
PracFces
(NREPP)
• hcp://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/ ViewIntervenFon.aspx?id=254
• hcp://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/ ViewIntervenFon.aspx?id=151
• hcp://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/ ViewIntervenFon.aspx?id=16
ConFngency
Management
• IncenFves
are
provided
to
clients
conFngent
upon
objecFve
evidence
of
drug
absFnence.
• One
of
the
most
effecFve
approaches
to
promoFng
absFnence
during
and
ajer
treatment
(Dallery
&
Raiff,
2012)
– Cocaine
use
– Heroin
use
– Polydrug
use
– Cigarece
smoking
CM
Methods
• Voucher-‐based
CM
• Intermicent
prizes
(Fishbowl)
• Employment-‐based
• Cash
• Deposit
contract
• Take-‐home
doses
Variables
that
Influence
CM
• Schedule
of
reinforcement
– EscalaFng
– Reset
• Reinforcer
magnitude
• Delay
to
reinforcement
• Shaping
Reinforcement
of
other
target
behaviors
• Therapy
acendance
• Treatment
plans
• MedicaFon
adherence
CM
ConsideraFons
• Vouchers
must
be
spent
on
non-‐drug
acFviFes
– Groceries
– Discount/department
stores
– Auto
and
home
maintenance
– Restaurants
– Entertainment
– Children’s
needs
• Financial
decision-‐making