Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ged109 MRR2.3

    Uploaded by

    Jc Zero
    6 views1 page
    The document discusses several things that remained unclear to the author after reading an article. These include the study's main focus on male homosexuality despite including female homosexuality in the survey. The author is also curious about findings on other sexualities like asexuality that are less commonly represented. Additionally, the author found it unclear why the concept began addressing male homosexuality instead of female homosexuality. Finally, the author questions how religion impacts morality on homosexuality when people do not strictly follow all religious texts but draw the line at homosexuality.

    Original Description:

    try

    Original Title

    GED109_MRR2.3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses several things that remained unclear to the author after reading an article. These include the study's main focus on male homosexuality despite including female homosexuality in the survey. The author is also curious about findings on other sexualities like asexuality that are less commonly represented. Additionally, the author found it unclear why the concept began addressing male homosexuality instead of female homosexuality. Finally, the author questions how religion impacts morality on homosexuality when people do not strictly follow all religious texts but draw the line at homosexuality.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Ged109 MRR2.3

    Uploaded by

    Jc Zero
    The document discusses several things that remained unclear to the author after reading an article. These include the study's main focus on male homosexuality despite including female homosexuality in the survey. The author is also curious about findings on other sexualities like asexuality that are less commonly represented. Additionally, the author found it unclear why the concept began addressing male homosexuality instead of female homosexuality. Finally, the author questions how religion impacts morality on homosexuality when people do not strictly follow all religious texts but draw the line at homosexuality.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Some of the things presented in the article confused me and remained

    unclear, even after reading it. I realize that the study mainly focused on male-to-male

    homosexuality. The conclusion was based on the public's perception of them, even while

    the survey included female-to-female homosexuality. I am curious about the findings

    found with the latter and other sexualities as well, asexuality, for example, as this group

    is not as commonly represented as the lesbians and gays of the community. Another thing

    that remained unclear to me is that this whole concept began with male-to-male

    homosexuality while female-to-female homosexuality existed at the same time. What

    pushed people to address this issue because of the former and not the latter? The last

    thing that was unclear to me was how religion impacted people's moral impact regarding

    homosexuality because many do not even follow the rules of their holy book word for

    word. Yet, homosexuality is where they draw the line. Why is that?

    You might also like