DO YOU THINK ACTS TO IMPROVE QUALITY HAD A DIRECT IMPACT ON

PRODUCTIVITY?
Yes, I believe it does, because it raises production and quality Operations are poorly managed when they
are dangerous. Employee turnover will be much higher and employees won't be as driven or careful.
When workers are stressed, dissatisfied, or unable to finish their tasks, quality and productivity
decrease. However, when workplaces are secure, employees are free to concentrate on their
effectiveness and productivity. Like Large-scale disruptions will occur in an organization less frequently
the safer it is. Every country wants to raise productivity and product quality while lowering costs. For
this, they need to limit resource waste and identify more environmentally friendly alternatives. To
improve quality, proper training and learning should be provided for the workers. Government should
set up favorable terms for industries to import cutting-edge technology and equipment. Finally, if
organizations wish to increase profit and productivity and stay competitive in the global market, they
must be aware of their obligations.

Continuous quality improvement can result in hiccups in productivity in the short term
as businesses implement better processes, but it can lead to increased productivity in
the long term. For example, a small business that revises its production processes
might have to shut down production for a day to implement the improvements,
resulting in a day of lost production. After the changes take effect, though, the
company might have fewer production slowdowns and higher productivity.

increasing productivity

• In conclusion, placing a high value on productivity means

sacrificing quality and perhaps losing output.

Costs increase, customers are dissatisfied, employee morale

plummets, and stockholders become concerned.
affecting the quality

• However, focusing on quality can yield all the desired outcomes:

less rework, enhanced competitive position, higher productivity,
lower unit cost, and price flexibility, greater profitability, greater
employment opportunities, and higher demand.

Why Customers receive high-quality goods at affordable prices, and

suppliers receive stable, long-term supplies of

Profits accrue to businesses and investors.

• The company's performance will improve if quality management

becomes the top priority.

Increase productivity, cut costs, and improve the working

environment.
Define Porter’s theory and its five theories in your
own words.
 

In my own understanding and based on what I

read and learn in the module Porter's theory is a
model that identifies and analyses five
competitive forces that shape every industry and
helps determine an industry's weaknesses and
strengths. Also, it help to explain why various
industries are able to sustain different levels
of profitability. it is an analysis frequently used
to identify an industry's structure to determine
corporate strategy a framework for analysing
a company's competitive environment. So
for instance These forces include the
number and power of a company's
competitive rivals, potential new market
 entrants, suppliers, customers, and
substitute products that influence a
company's profitability.

 .
 Five Forces analysis can be used to guide
business strategy to increase competitive
advantage.
Porter's Five Forces is a business analysis
model that helps to explain why various
industries are able to sustain different levels of
profitability. The Five Forces are frequently
used to measure competition intensity,
attractiveness, and profitability of an industry or
market.
Example 1

In this example, Fabuleux, an existing apparel company, is entering

the athletic shoes and big clothing market her in the province of
Quezon.

Competitive rivalry:  The athletic apparel industry already has several

large, well-established companies. They have large budgets and a lot of
resources to keep their market share. Because Fabuleux's products are
not yet perfected, these companies or others may attempt to imitate
them. Fabuleux faces fierce competition.

Threat of new entrants: Entering the clothing market requires a

significant investment in terms of production, advertising, and
branding. Existing large apparel companies, on the other hand, may
decide to enter the athletic market. New entrants pose a medium to
low threat.

Threat of substitute products: Although businesses could copy

Fabuleux's invention products, there is a high and rising demand for
athletic wear. Low risk exists from substitute goods.
 Bargaining power of buyers: Both end users and retailers buy from
Fabuleux. Wholesale clients have the negotiating power to replace
Fabuleux products with those of less expensive rivals. However,
consumers are devoted to the Fabuleux brand. The buyers' collective
negotiating power is moderate.

Bargaining power of suppliers: The supplier base for the athletic

apparel market is extensive and diverse. Furthermore, Fabuleux has a
lot of options because it uses various businesses in numerous nations to
manufacture its products. The suppliers' ability to negotiate is limited.

Fabuleux's now understands it needs to concentrate its

resources on patenting and marketing to more end users because,
according to this analysis, it has a good chance of being profitable in

the athletic apparel industry.