You are on page 1of 3

Experiment to Verify Snell's Law of Refraction and to Estimate the Speed of Light

inside a Transparent Plastic Block (Topic 4)

Criteria Assessed: DCP, CE, MS Time allowed: 1.5h Name: ________________________


Internal Assessment
Criteria Aspect 1 Aspect 2 Aspect 3 Total
DCP
CE

Aim: To verify Snell’s Law of refraction and to estimate the speed of light inside a transparent plastic block.

𝒔𝒊𝒏𝜽𝟏 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝜽𝟐
Snell’s Law: 𝒏𝟏 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝜽𝟏 = 𝒏𝟐 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝜽𝟐 or =
𝒄𝟏 𝒄𝟐

where n1 is the refractive index of medium 1 n2 is the refractive index of medium 1


θ1 is the incident angle θ2 is the refraction angle
c1 is the speed of light in medium 1 c2 is the speed of light in medium 2

𝒔𝒊𝒏 𝜽𝟏
The refractive index of the transparent plastic block is therefore: 𝒏𝟐,𝟏 =
𝒔𝒊𝒏 𝜽𝟐

The critical angle can also be used to determine the refractive index of the transparent plastic block.
𝟏
𝒏𝒃𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒌 =
𝒔𝒊𝒏 𝜽𝒄

Method:

Verify Snell’s Law and find the refractive index.


1. Using the special apparatus provided, measure the angles of
refraction corresponding to a wide range of angles of incidence.
Remember, the angles of incidence and refraction are always
measured from a normal line.
2. Adjust the position of the light source carefully to ensure that
when the angle of incidence is zero, the angle of refraction is also zero
3. Plot a suitable graph to verify Snell's Law.
4. Use the graph to find the refractive index of the plastic and hence calculate the speed of light inside the plastic.
(Assume that the speed of light in air is the same as the
speed of light in a vacuum, 3×108ms-1.)

Estimate the critical angle of incidence for light passing from


this plastic to air.
1. Use the apparatus arranged to measure the critical angle of
incidence.

Analysis:

In your report, explain


a) why it is convenient to have a semi-circular plastic block
b) why the block must be turned through 180° (as shown in the second diagram) to measure the critical angle of
incidence
c) what is the main difficulty in measuring the angles of refraction (especially noticeable when the angle of refraction is
large).

Note: don’t forget to present all results with their uncertainties and calculate all errors.
A full write up is required for the lab. This sheet is the cover sheet for the lab.

Data collection and processing


Aspect 1 Aspect 2 Aspect 3
Levels/marks
Recording raw data Processing raw data Presenting processed data
Records appropriate quantitative and Processes the quantitative raw data Presents processed data appropriately
Complete/2 associated qualitative raw data, including units correctly. and, where relevant, includes errors
and uncertainties where relevant. and uncertainties.
Records appropriate quantitative and Processes quantitative raw data, but Presents processed data appropriately,
Partial/1 associated qualitative raw data, but with some with some mistakes and/or omissions. but with some mistakes and/or
mistakes or omissions. omissions.
Does not record any appropriate quantitative No processing of quantitative raw data Presents processed data
Not at all/0 raw data or raw data is incomprehensible. is carried out or major mistakes are inappropriately or incomprehensibly.
made in processing.

Conclusion and evaluation


Aspect 1 Aspect 2 Aspect 3
Levels/marks
Concluding Evaluating procedure(s) Improving the investigation
States a conclusion, with justification, based Evaluates weaknesses and limitations. Suggests realistic improvements in respect
Complete/2 on a reasonable interpretation of the data. of identified weaknesses and limitations.
States a conclusion based on a reasonable Identifies some weaknesses and Suggests only superficial improvements.
Partial/1 interpretation of the data. limitations, but the evaluation is weak
or missing.
States no conclusion or the conclusion is Identifies irrelevant weaknesses and Suggests unrealistic improvements.
Not at all/0 based on an unreasonable interpretation of limitations.
the data.

You might also like