You are on page 1of 57

Warehousing - IV

For VIDEO LECTURE


(Parts 1 and 2) Click:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CMxOl4a_lZZu
jcv0F5H7i0ejkTLvEfpJ/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SWu9BYvIog-
BZjfe669L_Ncr_7Kb-T37/view?usp=sharing

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.1 of 57


Options for Acquiring Warehouse Space:
A Strategic Decision
 Owning/Leasing for Long-Term
(Private Warehouses)
 Hiring Storage Space as a Service
(Public Warehouses)
 Contracting Warehousing Services
(Product-/Industry-Specific Warehouses
- Contracted for Medium-Term; and
- Operated by 3PL Providers* as Dedicated
or Shared-User Operations)

*Third-Party Logistics (Service) Providers

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.2 of 57


The Choice Depends on:
 The demand patterns/seasonality,
volumes, geographical location, and
packaging of the products

 The financial strength of the firm

 The service levels expected


by the customer
• The selection is a strategic decision
having long-term implications
for the efficiency and effectiveness
of the logistics system of the firm.

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.3 of 57


Warehouse Options
Factors Private WH Public WH Contract WH
Investment Very high None Very less
Offers Material Handling, Storage,
Location Location
Flexibility in Throughput Planning
Cost per unit Inversely related Inversely related
Low
stored to volumes to volumes
Storage and Customized, Product-Specific, General, Product-Specific,
Operation Centralized & Stable Dispersed Dispersed
Control over
High Low Medium
the Operations
High, due to changes in market
Risk Minimal Medium
demand or consumption centers
Suitable for Stable, Mass Production Seasonal Medium Term

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.4 of 57


Warehouse and Distribution Center
 Although the terms “Warehouse”
and “Distribution Center (DC)”
are used interchangeably,
there are significant differences
between the two.

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.5 of 57


Warehouse and Distribution Center
Activity Warehouse Distribution Center

Storage: Proportion of Less than 50% of Greater than 50% of


Fast-Moving Items the Total Inventory the Total Inventory

Stock Turns
(Annual Sales ÷ Less than 8 Times More than 8 Times
Average Inventory Level)

More than 90% of the Items More than 50%


Dominant Mode of
Involve Receiving, Storing, of the Items Involve
Order Handling
Picking and Dispatching Cross-Docking Only

Communications Mode Batch Data Collection Real-Time Data Collection

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.6 of 57


Factors to Consider while Deciding Number of
Warehouses for a Multiple Depot Network
 Market Size
 Area to be Covered by Each Warehouse
 Types of Products to Be Stored
 Demand Pattern (Continuous or Seasonal)
 Customer Service Level (Higher customer service levels
and shorter lead times require more warehouses)

 Competition
 Establishment and Operating Costs

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.7 of 57


Effect of Increasing Number of Stocking Locations
(Warehouses) on Inventory: The Square-Root Rule

 The Square-Root Rule Introduced by


David Maister in 1976 States that:
 The Total Safety Stock of Inventory (I)
in a Supply Chain is Proportional
to the Square Root of the Number (n)
of Stocking Locations (I α √n)
 Ip /Ie = √(np /ne), or Ip = Ie * √(np /ne)

 The Rule is Based on several Assumptions.

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.8 of 57


The Square-Root Rule Is Based
on the Following Assumptions
 Inventory transfers between stocking locations
(warehouses) are not common practice
 Lead times do not vary
 Customer service levels, as measured
by inventory availability, are constant
regardless of the number of warehouses
 Demand at each location is normally distributed
 The amount of safety stock in each existing
warehouse is approximately the same.

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.9 of 57


Ip = Ie * √(np/ne)
Where:
Ip = Total Inventory in Proposed Warehouses
Ie = Total Inventory in Existing Warehouses
np = Number of Proposed Warehouses
ne = Number of Existing Warehouses
Reduction in Stockholding = [(Ie - Ip)/Ie] * 100%
= [1- √(np/ne)] * 100%

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.10 of 57


Warehouse Network—Cost Implications
Inbound (Primary)
Transportation Costs
Total
Inventory
Cost + Facilities
+ System Costs

Outbound (Secondary)
Transportation Costs
Cost

Number of warehouses

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.11 of 57


Factors to Be Considered for
Warehouse Site Selection
 Availability of Skilled Labor and Infrastructure
(Utilities, Communication, Transport Links for Staff)
 Proximity to the Suppliers, Manufacturing Points,
Markets or Consumption Sites, etc.
 Access to the Site (Approach Roads,
Ports, Rail Terminals, Freeways)
 Primary/Secondary Transportation Cost
 Availability of Space (Cost of Land, Rent, and Rates)
 Products to Be Stored (Perishable/Hazardous/Bulky)
 Regulations
 Local Taxes and Levies (Sales Tax, Govt. Incentives, etc.)

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.12 of 57


Quantitative Techniques for Warehouse Site
Selection for Single Depot Location
 Centre of Gravity of Market Area
 Centre of Gravity of Annual Loads
at Different Customer Locations
 Centre of Gravity of Load*Distance
(Tonnes-Kilometres, or Pallets-Kilometres)
from Different Sites

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.13 of 57


An Example of Center of Gravity Method
Distance (km) on Distance (km) on Demand (D)
Retail
the X-Axis (X) of the Y-Axis (Y) of in Pallets X*D Y*D
Outlet
the District Map the District Map per Week
A 15 12 100 1500 1200
B 05 08 150 0750 1200
C 16 05 120 1920 0600
D 07 08 090 0630 0720
E 02 18 080 0160 1440
F 09 11 140 1260 1540
G 12 13 110 1320 1430

TOTALS ( ∑D, ∑X*D, & ∑Y*D ) 790 7540 8130

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.14 of 57


Recommended Warehouse Location
(Distances on X and Y Axes of the District Map)

Distance on X-Axis = ∑X* D / ∑D = 7540/790 = 09.54 km

Distance on Y-Axis = ∑Y* D / ∑D = 8130/790 = 10.29 km

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.15 of 57


Warehouse Layout Design
An important factor in designing
the layout is whether the warehouse
is to be used predominantly:
 For storing goods
for relatively longer periods, or
 For frequent put-away and picking

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.16 of 57


Storing versus Picking
 The functions of storage and picking
have opposite requirements

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.17 of 57


Layout Requirements for Storage and Picking
Aspect Efficient Storage Efficient Picking

Large Areas: Requires longer Small Compact Areas: Can be


Storage Areas
distances to be covered located close to the dispatch area

Focus on High Utilization: Focus on Easier Movement of


 Less number of Pickers and Equipment:
Space Utilization narrow aisles desired  Large number of wide aisles
for Storage and cross aisles desired
 Pallets/containers can be
stacked over one another  Storage in racks for easy retrieval

Slotting Strategy Dynamic/Random Allocation Static/Fixed Allocation


(Locations for Storing  Each time a pallet arrives,  Each SKU is assigned
Different SKUs inside a location is determined a dedicated, fixed location
the Warehouse) to maximize space utilization where it will always be found

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.18 of 57


Storage Requirements and Picking Activity
High Pick, But Low Storage High Pick, and High Storage
High  Picking areas
(e.g., a Large Distribution Center)
Picking should be compact  High-tech automated picking
Activity
 Low-tech/manual storage  High-density, high rise storage
 Partial automation  Mechanized handling
for picking desirable

Low Pick, and Low Storage Low Pick, But High Storage
 Does not require  Manual or semi-automatic
high-tech automation, or picking
material handling equipment
Low  High-density storage
 Stacked pallets, floor storage, with high bays, multiple levels,
Picking
and racks & shelves and dense packing
Activity
 Manual material handling

Low Storage Requirements High Storage Requirements

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.19 of 57


Typical Warehouse Site Requirements
As Percentage of
Area Designated for  Area (sq m)
the Total Site Area
Floor Area of the Warehouse 10,000 33% to 34%
Expansion Allowance 3,000 10%
Car Parking 3,000 10%
Truck Turning 4,500 15%
Building Services 300 1%
Landscaping and Open Space
9,000 30%
(for Truck Queuing and Parking)

Total Site Area Required


29,820 100%
(for a 10,000 sq m Warehouse)

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.20 of 57


Warehouse Layout Design Guidelines
 Make the best use of available space
 Use a “unitized” load system suitable for storage
 Minimize the movement of goods
by allotting proper storage areas/locations
for slow-moving and fast-moving items
(Fast-moving items should be located together
and close to the despatch area)

 Provide flexibility for changing future needs


 Design safe, secure, and clean working conditions

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.21 of 57


Detailed Layout Design Steps
 Define a location for receiving
and shipping functions
 Allocate separate areas for slow-,
medium-, and fast-moving items
 Define locations for fixed obstacles,
such as building columns, staircases,
elevator shafts, toilets, etc.

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.22 of 57


Detailed Layout Design Steps (continued)
 Define the shortest paths
for the movement of equipment
and personnel for faster storage
and retrieval
 Determine the locations for stationary
material handling equipment
(overhead cranes, conveyors)
 Determine the locations
for storage equipment

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.23 of 57


Detailed Layout Design Steps (continued)
 Generate alternative layouts
by repeating the above process steps
 Evaluate alternative layouts

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.24 of 57


Evaluation Criteria of Alternative Layouts
 Item Turnover
(particularly the speed and cost at which
high turnover items can be put away and picked up)
 Space Utilization
(The ratio <utilized-space/open-space>
inside the Warehouse (not inside the warehouse site)
for semi-automated warehouses varies
between 70/30 to 75/25, and for fully automated
warehouses it could be as high as 85/15)

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.25 of 57


Evaluation Criteria of
Alternative Layouts (continued)
 Product Configurations
(Accessibility and ease of moving large and heavy items;
special arrangements for fragile and odd-shaped items;
open yards for large/heavy items that are
not affected by elements of nature)

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.26 of 57


Evaluation Criteria of
Alternative Layouts (continued)
 Product Characteristics
(e.g., facilitation of fast stock rotation
for items having shorter shelf life)
 Conducive to Good Housekeeping
 Safety and Security for People,
Equipment, and Products
(avoiding sharp blind bends; easy
detection of pilferage, damages, etc.)

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.27 of 57


Storage Systems
 Pallet Storage/Retrieval Systems
 Block Stacking, Stacking Frames,
Single-Deep Selective Pallet Rack, Double Deep Rack,
Drive-in Rack, Drive-thru Rack,
Pallet Flow (FIFO) Rack, Push-Back (LIFO) Rack

 Bin Shelving Systems


 Modular Storage Drawers and Cabinets
 Gravity Flow Racks
 Carousels (Vertical / Horizontal)

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.28 of 57


Hazardous Materials (Hazmats)
 Hazmats (such as, explosives,
flammable liquids, flammable solids)
need special attention because:
 They can cause Ill health, injuries,
death, and property damage.

 Shipping documents must indicate the hazardous


nature of the materials being transported.
 Warehouse employees should note
these warnings when receiving
and shipping Hazmats.

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.29 of 57


Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
 Many countries require that organizations
create a Material Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for
each Hazmat to be stored in a facility.

 The MSDS contains information about


the physical/health hazards associated
with a particular product and also
information about its proper storage.

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.30 of 57


Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)
(aka Safety Data Sheet, or Product Safety Data Sheet)
 Provides workers and emergency personnel
with procedures for handling or working with
a substance in a safe manner; it forms a part of
product stewardship and occupational safety and
health data, and includes information such as:
 Physical data (melting point,
boiling point, flash point, etc.)
 Toxicity, health effects, first aid, reactivity
 Storage, disposal, protective equipment,
and Spill-handling procedures

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.31 of 57


Design Elements for the Storage of Hazmats
 Specially constructed areas that ensure
that the materials can be contained
in the case of an accident.
 Walls and doors that can withstand
several hours of intense fire
 Proper sprinkling systems
and excellent ventilation

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.32 of 57


Warehouse
Warehouse Decision Model Facility Planning
Decisions
Product Type Objectives Resources Strategic
• Solid • Cost • Finance • Layout
• Liquid Reduction • System • Handling
• Gaseous • Stock • Competency
Equipment
Turnover • Storage
Product Schemes
• Customer
Characteristics
Satisfaction Tactical
• Value • Storage
Density • Productivity Warehouse
Allocation
• Logistical Network
• Order Picking
Reach (Numbers and
• Packing
• Perishability Locations)
Operational
/Shelf Life • Private
• Work
• Hazardous • Public Allocation
• Contract • Job Scheduling
• Performance
Monitoring
Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.33 of 57
Examples of Warehouse Layouts

Material Inward and Inspection

Bulk Storage Rack/Bin Storage


Place Place

Order Picking Section

Packaging Section

Material Dispatch Section

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.34 of 57


U-Flow Warehouse

Low Usage (Slow-Moving) Items

Medium Usage Items

High Usage (Fast-Moving) Items


Sortation &
QA Consolidation

Empty Cross Dock


Pallets

Goods Inwards Dispatches


Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.35 of 57
Through-Flow Warehouse

Low Usage (Slow-Moving) Items

Medium Usage Items


Goods Inwards

Dispatches
High Usage (Fast-Moving) Items

Medium Usage Items

Low Usage (Slow-Moving) Items

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.36 of 57


Trade-offs in Warehouse Management
(Trade-offs within warehouse itself and also between
warehouse operation and other logistics services)
 Cost versus Service
(Inventory Holding Costs versus Cost of Stock outs
Labor Cost Reduction versus Increasing Throughput)

 Speed versus Accuracy


(Increased Pick Rates versus Accuracy)

 Speed versus Safety


 Efficiency versus Responsiveness
(Storage Density versus Quicker Pallet Extractions)

 Volume Purchase Discounts versus Storage Cost

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.37 of 57


To Balance the trade-offs and
to remain competitive, companies follow various
Warehousing Strategies, for example:
 Capacity Switching
 Hub Networking
 Cobbling
 Outsourcing

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.38 of 57


To Balance the trade-offs and
to remain competitive, companies follow various
Warehousing Strategies, for example:
 Capacity Switching: in the face of
fluctuating or seasonal demand, the warehouse capacity
is planned on the basis of average demand;
the excess space requirement is taken care of
through public or contract warehouses.

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.39 of 57


Warehouse Capacity Planning

Public or Contract Warehouse


for 25% of Capacity Reqts.

Storage
Capacity Private Warehouse
Requirements for 75% of Capacity Reqts.

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Months

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.40 of 57


To Balance the trade-offs and
to remain competitive, companies follow various
Warehousing Strategies, for example:
 Capacity Switching
 Hub Networking: Instead of establishing
warehouses for each small region (state),
warehousing hubs are established at fewer
strategic locations (e.g., at/near metro cities) to take
advantage economies of scale and risk pooling

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.41 of 57


To Balance the trade-offs and
to remain competitive, companies follow various
Warehousing Strategies, for example:
 Capacity Switching
 Hub Networking
 Cobbling: Companies serving noncompeting products
to similar customer segments through
similar market channels cobble together
to have common warehouses and logistics
to exploit economies of scale and scope

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.42 of 57


To Balance the trade-offs and
to remain competitive, companies follow various
Warehousing Strategies, for example:
 Capacity Switching
 Hub Networking
 Cobbling
 Outsourcing to Logistics Service Providers
that Have Warehousing as Their Core Competency
and Economies of Scale and Scope

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.43 of 57


Warehouse Performance Parameters
 Warehouse Cost-to-Sales Ratio

 Warehouse Cost per Unit Handled

 Occupancy Rate of Warehouse Space

 Stock Turn-Over Ratio


 Dock-to-Stock Time (DTS). The lapsed time from
when a receipt arrives until it is ready for picking

 Warehouse Order Cycle Time (WOCT).


The lapsed time from when an order is released to the
warehouse until it is picked, packed, and ready for shipping

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.44 of 57


Warehousing Key Performance Indicators (WKPIs)

Function  Financial Productivity Utilization Quality Cycle Time

Receiving Cost % Receipts Receipt


Receipts per % Dock Door
Receiving per Receiving Processed Processing Time
Man-Hour Utilization
Line Accurately per Receipt

% Utilization
Put-away Cost Put-aways Put-away
of Put-away % Perfect
Put-away per per Cycle Time
Labor and Put-aways
Put-away Line Man-Hour per Put-away
Equipment

% Locations
Inventory % Locations
Storage Space without Inventory Days
Storage per Square and Cube
Cost per Item Inventory on Hand
Foot Utilization
Discrepancies

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.45 of 57


Warehousing Key Performance Indicators (WKPIs) (continued)

Function  Financial Productivity Utilization Quality Cycle Time

Picking Cost Order Lines % Utilization of % Perfect Order Picking


Order
per Order Picked per Picking Labor Picking Cycle Time
Picking
Line Man-Hour and Equipment Lines per Order

Shipping Orders
% Utilization Warehouse
Cost per Prepared for % Perfect
Shipping of Shipping Order
Customer Shipment per Shipments
Docks Cycle Time
Order Man-Hour

Total Cost Total Lines % Utilization of Total


% Perfect
per Order, Shipped per Total Throughput Warehouse
TOTAL Warehouse
Line, and Total and Storage Cycle Time
Orders
Item Man-Hour Capacity = DTS + WOCT

DTS = Dock-to-Stock Time; WOCT = Warehouse Order Cycle Time (Described Earlier)

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.46 of 57


Warehousing Challenges
Warehousing
# Operational Requirements
Challenge

1 Reducing Increase productivity: improve space, staff, and


Operating Costs equipment utilization; evaluate outsourcing

2 Achieving the Increase productivity, increase accuracy,


Perfect Order* improve handling, and invest in systems

*Perfect Order is one delivered on time, in full, in perfect condition


and accompanied with the correct documentation
(preferably in electronic format rather than paperwork)

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.47 of 57


Warehousing Costs

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.48 of 57


Warehousing Challenges (continued)
# Warehousing Challenge Operational Requirements

Improve processes and


3 Reducing order lead times
increase productivity

Selling and delivering Improved picking strategies


4 through multiple channels; (e.g., bulk picking) and
smaller more frequent orders greater use of technology

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.49 of 57


Warehousing Challenges (continued)
Warehousing
# Operational Requirements
Challenge

Handle fluctuating Flexible working hours and


5
demand improved forecasting

Improved use of equipment such carousels,


Handle large
A-Frames, and flow racks; improve picking
number of Stock
6 process to increase efficiency;
Keeping Units
reduce SKUs to basic components; and, use
(SKUs)
postponement to bundle or finish to order

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.50 of 57


Warehousing Challenges (continued)
Warehousing
# Operational Requirements
Challenge

Staff retention through


Increased cost
excellent working conditions,
7 and shortage of
flexible hours, training and
skilled labor
improved productivity

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.51 of 57


Warehousing Challenges (continued)
Warehousing
# Operational Requirements
Challenge

Manage energy consumption in lighting,


mechanical handling equipment (MHE),
Increasing cost heating/cooling more efficiently.
of energy and
8 The waste generated in warehouse (e.g.,
environmental
issues stretch-wraps, cardboards, tapes, pallets, etc.)
should be tightly controlled, recycled,
reused, or converted into energy.

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.52 of 57


Warehousing Challenges (continued)
Warehousing
# Operational Requirements
Challenge

Data accuracy
Introduce Warehouse Management System
9 and speed of
(WMS) and real-time data transfer.
data transfer

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.53 of 57


Supply Chain Trends Affecting Warehouses
# Supply Chain Trends Effect on Warehouses

Increase Requirements of Fulfilment


1 Growth of e-Commerce
and Returns Processing Centers

Increased Competition Need for Making Warehousing


2
Requiring Lower Prices More Efficient and Cost Effective

Increased use of transshipment,


Retailers Attempting
3 consolidation centers,
to Reduce Stock
and cross-docking

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.54 of 57


Supply Chain Trends Affecting Warehouses
# Supply Chain Trends Effect on Warehouses

Manufacturing Being Moved Closer Near-Shoring and In-Shoring


4 to the Consumer to Reduce leading to reduced demand
Transportation and Inventory Costs for warehousing space

Large warehouses being


5 Increase in Port-Centric Logistics
built near ports of entry

Miniaturization of some product Lesser space required


categories such as mobile devices in warehouses for
6
and PCs, and digitization of audio, these type of products
video, and software products

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.55 of 57


Supply Chain Trends Affecting Warehouses
# Supply Chain Trends Effect on Warehouses

Development of Brown Field Sites,


Linkages to Rail and Inland Waterways,
Emphasis on Self-sufficiency in Terms of Energy Use—
7
Sustainability Having Own Means of Power Generation
(Solar, Wind, etc.), and
Expectation to Be Carbon Positive

Greater Vertical/Horizontal Increase Shared-User Operations


Collaboration in/among Leading to a Reduction in
8
Supply Chains Leading to the Number of Warehouses
Greater Consolidation

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.56 of 57


THE END

Warehousing by khalid_sheikh / LM 1.3.57 of 57

You might also like