Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Draft of Resubmisision
Final Draft of Resubmisision
Intro
Unless medically-required, ‘sex-normalisation’ surgeries are unnecessary, deferrable interventions that infringe
upon an individual’s right to consent. Autonomy, in the clinical setting, allows for self-determination; autonomy
can be de ned as “the capacity to think, decide, and act freely and independently on the basis of such thought
and decisions.” (Gillon R., 1985).
Ethical issue
An issue that continually resurfaced throughout this article, was the fact that none of the intersex individuals that
were mentioned had a choice in the matter. The parents, from Noah’s case for example, felt pressurised to go
through with the treatment; they later expressed regret in not nding out more. To add to this, the medical teams
responsible have made permanent alterations to the body of an un-consenting individual over an anatomical
difference; the changes made were not based on any medical grounds and are therefore not justi ed —
throughout the article, they insinuated how this is a modi cation that needs to take place. More importantly, an
alteration this signi cant needs the consent of the individual itself; for instance, imagine changing the gender of
a newborn male or female without its explicit consent … The treatment of a transgender child is subject to a
number of requirements, “generally, gender af rming surgeries are not available to people under the age of 18.”
(TransHub, 2022), so why is it not the same case with non-binary individuals? Noah, preferred to have been left
the way he was born; the procedures however are irreversible, “… the tissue or organs that are removed cannot
be replaced, nerves that are severed cannot be regrown, and scar tissue can limit options for future surgery.”
(Human Rights Watch, 2017). These alterations can also be associated with harmful risk factors such as
infertility, loss of bladder-control and sexual function — Tony Briffa, for example, was left worse off after her
treatments.
Conclusion
To conclude, sex-normalisation surgeries should only be performed after obtaining the informed-consent of the
individual in question. “Surgery for intersex infants should be delayed until individuals are able to decide for
themselves, except where it is a medical necessity.” (Behrens KG., 2020). Not doing so would breach the ethical
pillar of bodily autonomy as it would undermine the individual’s right to consent; it would undermine Doctors’
integrity.
1
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fl
fi
References
Gillon R. Autonomy and the principle of respect for autonomy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jun
15;290(6484):1806-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6484.1806. PMID: 3924266; PMCID: PMC1415948.
Behrens KG. A principled ethical approach to intersex paediatric surgeries. BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Oct
29;21(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00550-x. PMID: 33121480; PMCID: PMC7597036.
Human Rights Watch. 2022. “I Want to Be Like Nature Made Me”. [online] Available at: <https://www.hrw.org/
report/2017/07/25/i-want-be-nature-made-me/medically-unnecessary-surgeries-intersex-children-us>.