Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Method: 10 drops of concentrated sulphuric acid were placed into a clean, dry
boiling tube. 6 ml of glacial ethanoic acid was added to the boiling tube. 4ml of
propan-2-ol was added to the mixture. The contents of the boiling tube were
shaken to ensure thorough mixing. The water in the water bath was heated until the
water began to boil, then the water bath was heated no longer. The boiling tube was
placed and left in the hot water for 20 minutes. When the mixture in the tube began
to boil, the boiling tube was quickly removed from the water until the boiling
ceased, and was then returned to the hot water bath. The contents of the boiling
tube were shaken periodically to ensure proper mixing. After 20 minutes, the
boiling tube was carefully placed in a 100ml beaker that was half-filled with tap
water and was allowed to cool completely. When cooling was complete, 20 ml of
the 0.5 M sodium carbonate was slowly added to the boiling rube in 5 ml portions.
The boiling tube was shaken well to ensure thorough mixing. The product was
smelled by gently wafting the odor towards the experimenter’s nose with the
experimenter’s hands. The above procedure was repeated using ethanol instead of
propan-2-ol.
Result:
TABLE 1: THE OBSERVATIONS MADE DURING THE STAGES IN THE
ESTERIFICATION OF ETHYL ETHANOATE AND PROPYL
ETHANOATE.
Carboxylic OBSERVATIONS
acid and
alcohol
combined
respectively
After mixing During heating During the addition of Whether or The relative Scent of
carboxylic acid the boiling tube NaCO3 in 5 ml not a layer ease with product
and alcohol with in the water bath portions formed which the
H2SO4 in the layer formed
boiling tubes
Ethanoic Clear, transparent No boiling was Effervescence was Layer formed Not very easy Sweet fruity
acid + solution observed observed observed. A very thin smell, the
propan-2-ol transparent layer slowly scent of pears.
separated above the
solution after the third 5
ml addition.
Ethanoic Clear, transparent The solution Effervescence was Layer formed Very easy Sweet fruity
acid + solution observed began boiling observed. A thin layer smell, the
ethanol several times began to form above the scent of
solution on the initial 5 grapes.
ml addition.
Esters are virtually soluble in water and tend to form a thin layer on the surface
because they have low densities than the alcohols and carboxylic acids used to
make them. Excess acid and alcohol used both dissolve and remain below the ester
layer.
The balanced chemical equation for the synthesis of ethyl ethanoate from ethanoic
acid and ethanol catalyzed by sulphuric acid is as follows:
Conc. H2SO4
Ethanoic acid + ethanol ⇌ ethyl ethanoate + water
Heat
Conc. H2SO4
CH3COOH (l) + C2H5OH (l) ⇌ CH3COOC2H5 (l) + H2O (l)
Heat
The balanced chemical equation for the synthesis of propyl ethanoate from
ethanoic acid and propan -2- ol catalyzed by sulphuric acid is as follows:
Conc. H2SO4
Ethanoic acid + propan - 2 - ol ⇌ propyl ethanoate + water
Heat
Conc. H2SO4
CH3COOH (l) + CH3CH(OH)CH3 (l) ⇌ CH3COOC(CH3)2H (l) + H2O (l)
Heat
A thin layer began to form above the solution in the test boiling to which ethanoic
acid and ethanol were added on the initial 5 ml addition of sodium carbonate The
very thin layer above the solution in the boiling tube was the ester ethyl ethanoate,
while the solution below was excess ethanoic acid and ethanol.
On the other hand, a very thin layer began to form above the solution in the test
boiling to which ethanoic acid and propan-2-ol were added only after the third 5 ml
addition of sodium carbonate. The very thin layer above the solution in this boiling
tube was the ester propyl ethanoate, while the solution below was excess ethanoic
acid and propan -2- ol. The propyl ethanoate ester formed with greater ease and
was of greater yield than the ethyl ethanoate ester. The ethyl ethanoate ester had a
fruity scent, the smell of grapes, while the propyl ethanoate ester also had a fruity
scent, but the scent of pears.
Because esterification reactions are slow and reversible heat is required which
would favor the forward reaction to increase the yield of the ester, since the
reaction is also endothermic. If the heat supplied to the boiling tubes was
insufficient, or the 20 minute time period for which the boiling tubes were left in
the waster bath was insufficient then this may have decreased the yield of the ester,
or affected whether the ester formed or not.
Conclusion: Ethyl ethanoate and propyl ethanoate were made by reacting ethanol
and propan -2 - ol, each with ethanoic acid.