Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Water and Waste Water Filtration Concepts and Applications
Water and Waste Water Filtration Concepts and Applications
Water and Waste Water Filtration Concepts and Applications
research
transport in filtration is analogous to transport in flocculation removed must be made “sticky” or, more formally, destabil-
processes. A particle size with a minimum contact opportunity ized. The considerable research on colloid destabilization
exists; smaller particles are transported by diffusion while mechanisms during the last few decades can be used to under-
larger particles are transported by interception and settling. stand these chemical aspects of filtration. In both processes,
Applications of these concepts to water and waste water suspended particles must be transported so that contacts
filtration are presented. may be achieved. In coagulation, the transport models of
Smoluckowski (1917) are used. These models predict that in
water the transport of particles larger than about µ is accom-
plished by velocity gradients or fluid motion; for smaller
particles, Brownian diffusion is effective. In water filtration,
paper is written with three objectives. First, mecha- transport models are being derived which are based on models
This
nisms for coagulation and filtration processes are developed by investigators in air filtration (e.g., Friedlander,
presented as analogous; similarities between these processes 1958). One such model is presented in this paper; others have
are particularly helpful in understanding filtration processes been presented by Spielman and Goren (1970) and Cookson
and in assessing their capabilities. Second, a theoretical or (1970). These models predict that suspended particles larger
conceptual model of water and waste water filtration processes than about 1 µ are transported to the filter media by settling
is set forth; the results of experiments designed to test this and interception; smaller particles are again effectively trans-
model are presented and discussed. Third, conclusions are ported by Brownian diffusion.
reached concerning the capabilities of filters for removing Transport Model. Let us begin by considering a single
pollutants in water and waste water treatment; suggestions spherical particle of the filter media. Assume that it is
are made for the design and operation of filters which accom- unaffected by its neighbors and is fixed in space in the flowing
plish this removal. suspension (Figure 1). This single particle of filter media
Coagulation and Filtration Processes. The overall rate of is a collector, emphasizing that the ultimate purpose of
aggregation in a coagulation process is frequently evaluated by transporting suspended particles from the bulk flow to the
determining the rate at which collisions occur between par- external surfaces of media grains in packed beds is the
ticles by fluid motion (orthokinetic flocculation) and by collection of these particles, thereby accomplishing their
Brownian diffusion (perikinetic flocculation), multiplied by a removal from the water. The main flow direction is that of the
“collision efficiency factor” which reflects the ability of gravitational force. A suspended particle following a stream-
chemical coagulants to destabilize colloidal particles and line of the flow may come in contact with the collector by
thereby permits attachment when contacts occur (e.g., Swift virtue of its own size (case A in Figure 1); this transport
and Friedlander, 1964; Birkner and Morgan, 1968; Hahn
process is interception. If the density of the suspended particle
and Stumm, 1968). A similar approach is used herein to is greater than that of water, the particle will follow a different
describe filtration processes. The removal of suspended par-
trajectory due to the influence of the gravitational force field
ticles within a filter is considered to involve at least two sepa- (case B). The path of the particle is influenced by the combined
rate and distinct steps: First, the transport of suspended effects of the buoyant weight of the particle and the fluid drag
on the particle. This transport process is sedimentation.
1
Present address: Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Consulting Engi- Finally, a particle in suspension is subject to random bombard-
neers, 1 Center Plaza. Boston, Mass. 02108. ment by molecules of the suspending medium, resulting in the
2
To whom correspondence should be addressed. well-known Brownian movement of the particle. The term
\d /
(4)
diffusion is used to describe mass transport by this process where C„ and C are the influent and effluent concentrations
(case C). for a packed bed.
The general equation describing the temporal and spatial An impression of the magnitude of in real systems can
variation of particle concentration in such a system may be be obtained by using a numerical example. Consider a con-
written as follows: ventional rapid sand filter with a bed depth of 24 in., a bed
porosity of 40%, and containing media with a size of 0.6
mg mm. Assume that the suspended particles to be removed are
™
+ v-VC =
DtmV*C + 1 _
£_) (1)
dt Pp) 37rpdp, dz completely destabilized (a 1). If such a filter removes 90%
=
where C is the local concentration of suspended particles, v (Equation 4). One is then led to ask what parameters affect .
is the local velocity of the water, t is the time, Dhm is the Subsequently it will be shown that depends not only on such
diffusion coefficient of the suspended particles, p and pP are parameters as the filtration velocity, media size, and water
the densities of the water and the suspended particles, re- temperature, but also in a significant manner on the size and
spectively, µ is the water viscosity, m and dp are the mass and density of the particles to be filtered.
diameter of the suspended particles, respectively, g is the In this paper the results of a theoretical model for the de-
gravitational acceleration, and z is the coordinate in the direc- termination of are presented. The results of laboratory
tion of the gravitational force. Equation 1 is derived from a experiments in which the filtration performance of packed
mass balance of C about an elemental volume of suspension. beds is characterized by influent and effluent concentrations
The first term on the left-hand side of the equation (dC/dr) (Co and C) are included. Comparisons of theoretical pre-
represents the temporal variation of C at any point with dictions of with experimental results are made using Equa-
coordinates x, y, and z; the second term (c· VC) describes the ion4.
effects of advection on the concentration at that point. On Numerical Determination of . The numerical solution
the right-hand side of Equation 1, the first term (DbmY-C) to the problem of predicting and filter efficiency involves
describes the effects of diffusion, and the second term char- four steps (Yao, 1968; Yao and O’Melia, 1968): (1) deter-
acterizes the effects of gravitational settling on the system. mining the distribution of particles in the region close to the
The influence of interception is included in the boundary surface of a single collector; (2) calculating the rate at which
conditions used in integrating the equation. The form of particles strike the collector surface; (3) computing the single-
Equation 1 has been widely used by engineers to describe the collector efficiency; and (4) calculating the overall removal
fate of pollutants in the atmosphere and in streams and estu- efficiency of a given packed-bed filter.
aries, and has been applied to air and water filtration processes. In step 1, the diffusion equation (Equation 1) is integrated
Equation 1 cannot be solved analytically; numerical pro- numerically to yield the distribution of particles in the region
cedures and (or) simplifying assumptions may be used. of interest. Several assumptions are made. First, a steady state
The Single-Collector Efficiency. The contact efficiency is assumed; i.e., dC/di =0. Second, Stokes equations for
of a single media particle or collector ( ) is a ratio—i.e., the fluid velocities in laminar flow around a sphere are used
the rate at which particles strike the collector divided by the in the advective term (v-YC). Subsequent experimental re-
rate at which particles flow toward the collector, as follows: sults and the work of other investigators (e.g., Spielman and
Goren, 1970) suggest this assumption is not justified for an
rate at which particles strike the collector accurate description of packed-bed systems. Third, Einstein’s
v
7rd2 (2) equation is used to estimate the diffusion coefficient of the
v0 Co
suspended particles:
z>
_1
Ll
u.
LU
<
2
QJ
a:
<
cr
i-
2
Ld
O
2
O
o
TIME(minutes)
v0
=
2gpm/sq.ft. T = 23°C
d = 0.397 mm f = 0.36
dp
= 1.10 microns L= 5.5 in.
Pp
= 1.05 gm/cm3 Polymer Coating =CAT-FL0C
(no polymer used after t = 0 )
SIZE OF SUSPENDED PARTICLES (microns)
Figure 5. Typical experimental results for coated and uncoated filter
media Figure 6. Comparison of theoretical model and experimental data
ce
lead to less efficient filtration (6B).
o
- • During the first hour of filtration an initial relatively
UJ high concentration of particles appears in the effluent, after
_J
which the removal efficiency improves considerably. This
o
o initial breakthrough would be less noticeable if a deeper and
UJ more conventional filter bed were used.
_1
o • At the optimum polymer dose, filtration (transport
z
and attachment) is so effective that the available head loss
is utilized in about 3 hr. It is significant to note that this occurs
even with particles with a size in the order of 0.1 µ.
• These results suggest that when conventional filters fail
to produce efficient filtration, effective improvements can be
made by altering the chemistry of the system. In other words,
attention should be directed toward increasing a, rather than
FILTRATION RATE (gp m /sq. ft.) merely changing, such conventional filtration parameters as
d, v, and L.
Figure 7. Comparison of theoretical models and experimental data • Transport is so efficient in water and waste water filters
that when polymers are used to improve a, the filtration pro-
cess will be so effective that short filter runs will result with
conventional beds due to rapid clogging of the filter pores.
It is probable that effective filtration without excessive head
In these experiments where precoated filter media were
loss can be achieved with polymers and dual medium filters,
used without any additional use of destabilizing chemical,
it was expected and observed that the ability of the filter upflow filters, biflow filters, moving bed filters, etc.
Two additional statements can be made on the basis of
beds to remove particles would be exhausted in a short time.
other experiments. First, if polymers are used continuously
In this system the filter media can retain only a monolayer of
but without a precoat of polymer applied to the filter media;
particles; after this time the latex particles in suspension the time for filter ripening can be several hours. Latex par-
collide with negatively charged latex particles previously
ticles with polymer adsorbed at the optimum dose for co-
removed in the bed. In any real filtration process, the particles
to be removed must be able to adhere to each other on con-
agulation may be only partially removed by negatively charged
media. In practice such precoating could easily be achieved by
tact; this can be achieved by continuous addition of polymer.
An important question then arises—how much polymer is adding polymer to the backwash water (Harris, 1970). Second,
the optimum concentration of polymer required for filtration
needed? To answer this question, it is proposed that the chem-
depends on the concentration of colloids to be filtered.
ical aspects of filtration are similar to the chemical aspects of
Here again, filtration is analogous to coagulation. Stoichi-
coagulation. If this is so, then jar tests used to determine chem-
ical dosages for coagulation could serve the same purpose for ometry in coagulation has been reported by many investigators
(e.g., Black and Vilaret, 1969; Stumm and O’Melia, 1968).
filtration.
The results of experiments designed to test this hypothesis
Discussion
are presented in Figure 8. The results of jar tests are depicted
in 8A; residual turbidity after settling is plotted as a function Let us consider here some plausible causes for the dis-
of the applied dosage of cationic polymer. An optimum poly-
crepancies between model and observation (Figures 6 and 7).
mer dosage of 0.07 mg/liter is observed for this suspension.
First, the assumption that Stokes equation for the velocity
Vertical arrows correspond to dosages selected for study in
pattern about an isolated sphere can describe the velocity
filtration. The results of a filtration experiment are presented in distribution in a packed bed with a porosity of 36% is prob-
8B and C; effluent concentration and head loss are plotted as a
ably unrealistic. Pfeffer (Pfeffer, 1964; Pfeffer and Happel,
function of filtration time. Clean water again requires a period 1964) has used the cell model developed by Happel (1958)
for displacement. Based on these results the following state- to describe the velocity terms characterizing mass transfer by
ments can be made: diffusion in packed beds having porosities of 40% and higher.
• Effective filtration is achieved using the optimum poly- Cookson (1970) has applied this model to the filtration of
mer dose observed in the coagulation (jar) tests.
viruses. The results of the Pfeffer and Happel model are similar
• Underdosing and overdosing with polymer are observed. to the Levich equation (Equation 6), with the addition of a
Again, these phenomena are observed in jar tests. Overdosing porosity term:
in this case is probably due to sufficient adsorption of the cat-
ionic polymer to produce charge reversal of the latex particles. = 4BPe~2/3 (10)
• When no polymer is added to a precoated filter bed
(filter no. 1), the variation of effluent concentration with 1 ~
T5Y/3 W
where B = 1.26 = 2 —
3 + 35 —
2 6;
time is similar to that observed in earlier tests (e.g., Figure 5). w J
1110 Environmental Science & Technology
140
CD
M
r-
-J
o
< a
z>w
Q
</)
LU
CC
CD
1 2
»
111
i g
sa: s-j
H U.
S Ü¡
£ 2
”
O
O
(
V)
O (A
_J a>
a
<3
Hi
X
Figure 8. Comparison of jar test results (A) with filter performance (B and C)
and / = 1—
7s. For a packed bed with a porosity of 36%, will deviate from an undisturbed streamline (i.e., a fluid
B =
3.81, and = 15.24 Pe-2/3. streamline unaffected by the presence of the suspended par-
The results of the Pfeffer and Happel model are presented in ticle) due to the difficulty in draining fluid from between the
Figure 7, together with the Levich model and the results of collector and the particle as the distance between them nar-
experiments describing the effects of filtration on . As noted rows. London-van der Waals forces are invoked to overcome
earlier, experimental points are computed from observed this otherwise slow drainage. These authors developed a model
removal efficiencies of packed beds using Equation 4 and which predicts that when interception alone is operative the
assuming a =
1. The observed data are consistent with the filter coefficient can in fact vary with the first power of the
Pfeffer and Happel model if a is 0.5. In other words, if half of suspended particle size, as well as inversely with the 2.5 power
the contacts between the negatively charged latex particles of the collector size and the 0.25 power of the filtration rate.
and the polymer-coated filter media are successful in achiev- Next let us consider that experiments using a continuous
ing attachment, these data are quantitatively consistent with dosage of polymer indicated that filtration efficiency after a
the Pfeffer and Happel model for mass transport by diffusion ripening period was considerably better than that observed
in packed beds. when a precoated filter media was used alone, and an initial
All terms on the right-hand side of Equation 4 are com- ripening period always occurred. Possible explanations for
monly combined in a filter coefficient, (e.g., Ives, 1960); these phenomena include one or more of the following:
in the model described herein, X 3(1=
f)ar\¡ld. When
—
• Latex particles coated with the optimum dosage of
interception is the dominant transport mechanism this model polymer may find it more difficult to adhere to polymer-
predicts that the filter coefficient is independent of the flow coated glass beads than to previously retained latex treated
rate and varies as the square of the suspended particle size with the optimum polymer dosage. In other words, a for a
and the inverse cube of the media size. Limited experimental latex-glass bead interaction could be lower than for a latex-
results (Figure 6A) suggest that and consequently X vary latex interaction, even when all surfaces receive the appro-
with the first power of the suspended particle size when inter- priate polymer treatment.
ception and settling are dominant. Spielman and Goren • For particles greater than 1 µ, coagulation within the
(1970) note that a suspended particle approaching a collector pores could produce an increase in the effective size of these