Professional Documents
Culture Documents
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Dec 2022. | This topic last updated: Jan 13, 2023.
INTRODUCTION
The clinical features, evaluation, and diagnosis of croup will be discussed here. The
management of croup is discussed separately. (See "Management of croup".)
DEFINITIONS
The term "croup" has been used to describe a range of upper respiratory conditions in
children. For the purpose of this topic review, we will use the term "croup" to refer to viral
laryngotracheitis, as defined below.
Viral croup — Viral croup (also called classic croup) refers to the typical croup syndrome
that occurs commonly in children six months to three years of age. As the name implies, it is
caused by respiratory viruses and so viral symptoms (eg, nasal congestion, fever) are usually
present. Viral croup is usually a self-limited illness; the cough typically resolves within three
days [2]. (See 'Clinical presentation' below.)
Spasmodic croup — Spasmodic croup also occurs in children six months to three years of
age [1]. Spasmodic croup always occurs at night. The onset and cessation of symptoms are
abrupt, and the duration of symptoms is short, often with symptoms subsiding by the time
of presentation for medical attention. Fever is typically absent, but mild upper respiratory
tract symptoms (eg, coryza) may be present. Episodes can recur within the same night and
for two to four successive evenings [3]. A striking feature of spasmodic croup is its recurrent
nature, hence the alternate descriptive term "frequently recurrent croup." There may be a
familial predisposition to spasmodic croup, and it may be more common in children with a
family history of allergies [4]. Because there is some clinical overlap with atopic diseases, it is
sometimes referred to as "allergic croup."
Early in the clinical course, spasmodic croup may be difficult to distinguish from viral croup.
Over time, the episodic nature of symptoms and relative wellness of the child between
attacks differentiate spasmodic croup from viral croup, in which the symptoms are
continuous.
Although the initial presentation can be dramatic, the clinical course is usually benign.
Symptoms are almost always relieved by comforting the anxious child and administering
humidified air.
Recurrent episodes of croup also are labeled "atypical croup" or "recurrent croup," with
varying definitions and etiologic considerations [5]. (See 'Recurrent croup' below.)
Other related terms — The following conditions are related to croup, but we consider these
distinct clinical entities:
● Laryngitis – Laryngitis refers to inflammation limited to the larynx and manifests itself
as hoarseness [1]. It usually occurs in older children and adults and, similar to croup, is
frequently caused by a viral infection. Laryngitis is discussed separately. (See "Common
causes of hoarseness in children", section on 'Laryngitis'.)
ETIOLOGY
• Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and adenoviruses – RSV and adenoviruses are
relatively frequent causes of croup. The laryngotracheal component of disease is
usually less significant than that of the lower airways. (See "Respiratory syncytial
virus infection: Clinical features and diagnosis", section on 'Clinical manifestations'
and "Pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of adenovirus
infection", section on 'Clinical presentation'.)
common with the Omicron variant [14-16]. Some studies have reported more severe
symptoms and/or poor response to treatment in children with croup caused by
SARS-CoV-2 compared with other viral etiologies [12,14]. However, in the largest
case series (n = 75 children), most patients (88 percent) responded well to standard
croup treatments and were discharged from the emergency department [15]. (See
"COVID-19: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis in children".)
• Other human coronaviruses – HCoV-NL63 has been associated with croup and
other respiratory illnesses in children [17-20], as have human coronaviruses OC43
HKU1 [21]. (See "Coronaviruses", section on 'Respiratory syndromes'.)
• Others – Rhinoviruses, enteroviruses (especially coxsackie types A9, B4, and B5 and
echovirus types 4, 11, and 21), and herpes simplex virus are occasional causes of
sporadic cases of croup that are usually mild. (See "Enterovirus and parechovirus
infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention" and
"Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and pathogenesis of rhinovirus infections".)
● Bacterial infection – Croup is rarely caused by bacterial infection with the exception of
Mycoplasma pneumoniae, which can cause a mild croup-like illness [23]. (See
"Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children", section on 'Other respiratory
manifestations'.)
However, bacterial infection may occur secondarily. The most common bacterial
pathogens in this setting include Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and
Streptococcus pneumoniae [24]. This is discussed in detail separately. (See "Bacterial
tracheitis in children: Clinical features and diagnosis".)
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Croup is one of the most common respiratory illnesses in young children. It occurs mostly in
children ≤6 years old, with a peak incidence between six months to three years of age; it is
uncommon in children >6 years old [24,25]. A study of emergency department (ED) visits in
the United States from 2007 to 2014 estimated that there were approximately 350,000 to
400,000 croup-related ED visits each year, accounting for 1.3 percent of all ED visits [26].
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/croup-clinical-features-evaluation-and-diagnosis/print?search=laringite aguda&source=search_result&select… 4/43
17/01/2023 15:42 Croup: Clinical features, evaluation, and diagnosis - UpToDate
Children <2 years old accounted for 43 percent of the visits, children ages two to seven years
made up 50 percent of visits, and children ≥7 accounted for only 7 percent. Croup is more
common in boys, with reported male:female ratios ranging from 1.4:1 to 2:1 [24-28].
Family history of croup is a risk factor for croup and recurrent croup. In a case-control study,
children whose parents had a history of croup were 3.2 times as likely to have an episode of
croup and 4.1 times as likely to have recurrent croup as children with no parental history of
croup [29]. Parental smoking, a well-recognized risk factor for other respiratory tract
infections in children, does not appear to increase the risk of croup [29,30]. (See
"Secondhand smoke exposure: Effects in children", section on 'Respiratory symptoms and
illness'.)
Most cases of croup occur in the fall or early winter, with the major incidence peaks
coinciding with parainfluenza type 1 activity (often in October) and minor peaks occurring
during periods of respiratory syncytial virus or influenza virus activity. (See "Seasonal
influenza in children: Clinical features and diagnosis", section on 'Influenza activity' and
"Respiratory syncytial virus infection: Clinical features and diagnosis", section on
'Epidemiology'.)
ED visits for croup are most frequent between 10:00 PM and 4:00 AM [31]. However, children
seen for croup between noon and 6:00 PM are more likely to be admitted to the hospital
[7,32]. A morning peak between 7:00 AM and 11:00 AM in ED visits for croup also has been
noted [28].
Hospital admissions for croup have declined steadily since the late 1970s [8]. In a six-year
(1999 to 2005) population-based study, 5.6 percent of children with a diagnosis of croup in
the ED required hospital admission. Among those discharged home, 4.4 percent had a
repeat ED visit within 48 hours [28].
PATHOGENESIS
Pathology
● Viral croup – The viruses that cause croup typically infect the nasal and pharyngeal
mucosal epithelia initially and then spread locally along the respiratory epithelium to
the larynx and trachea.
The anatomic hallmark of croup is narrowing of the subglottic airway, the portion of
the larynx immediately below the vocal folds. The cricoid cartilage of the subglottis is a
complete cartilaginous ring, unlike the tracheal rings, which are horseshoe shaped.
Because it is a complete ring, the cricoid cannot expand, causing significant airway
narrowing whenever the subglottic mucosa becomes inflamed. In addition to this
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/croup-clinical-features-evaluation-and-diagnosis/print?search=laringite aguda&source=search_result&select… 5/43
17/01/2023 15:42 Croup: Clinical features, evaluation, and diagnosis - UpToDate
Laryngoscopic evaluation is rarely necessary for patients with viral croup, but, when
performed, it typically shows redness and swelling in the area just below the vocal folds
( picture 2). In severe cases, the subglottic airway may be reduced to a diameter of 1
to 2 mm. In addition to mucosal edema and swelling, fibrinous exudates and,
occasionally, pseudomembranes can build up on the tracheal surfaces and contribute
to airway narrowing. The vocal folds and laryngeal tissues also can become swollen,
and cord mobility may be impaired [1,33-35]. Autopsy studies in children with
laryngotracheitis show infiltration of histiocytes, lymphocytes, plasma cells, and
neutrophils into edematous lamina propria, submucosa, and adventitia of the larynx
and trachea [36-38].
Host factors — Only a small subset of children with a parainfluenza viral infection develop
overt croup. This suggests that host (or genetic) factors play a role in the pathogenesis. Host
factors that may contribute to the development of croup include functional or anatomic
upper airway narrowing, variations in immune response, and predisposition to atopy [28].
Underlying host factors that predispose to clinically significant narrowing of the upper
airway include:
● Congenital anatomic narrowing of the airway, such as subglottic stenosis [42]. (See
"Congenital anomalies of the larynx", section on 'Congenital subglottic stenosis'.)
● Acquired airway narrowing from a postintubation subglottic cyst or stenosis or, rarely,
from respiratory tract papillomas (human papillomavirus). Subglottic hemangiomas
( picture 3 and picture 4) grow in the first few months of life, and the patients will
typically present with symptoms mimicking croup (ie, stridor and barking cough). (See
"Congenital anomalies of the larynx", section on 'Cysts' and "Congenital anomalies of
the larynx", section on 'Subglottic hemangiomas'.)
The potential role of the immune response was illustrated in studies that demonstrated
increased production of parainfluenza virus-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and increased
lymphoproliferative response to parainfluenza virus antigen as well as diminished histamine-
induced suppression of lymphocyte transformation responses to parainfluenza virus in
children with parainfluenza virus and croup compared with those with parainfluenza virus
without croup [45,46].
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
Croup typically occurs in children six months to three years of age. Symptoms usually begin
with nasal discharge, congestion, and coryza and progress over 12 to 48 hours to include
fever, hoarseness, barking cough, and stridor. There is minimal, if any, pharyngitis. As airway
obstruction progresses, stridor develops and there may be mild tachypnea with a prolonged
inspiratory phase. Respiratory distress increases as upper airway obstruction becomes more
severe. Rapid progression or signs of concurrent lower airway involvement suggests a more
serious illness (eg, bacterial tracheitis or pneumonia).
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/croup-clinical-features-evaluation-and-diagnosis/print?search=laringite aguda&source=search_result&select… 7/43
17/01/2023 15:42 Croup: Clinical features, evaluation, and diagnosis - UpToDate
Croup is usually a self-limited illness, and the cough typically resolves within three days [2].
Other symptoms may persist for seven days, with a gradual return to normal [1]. Deviation
from this expected course should prompt consideration of diagnoses other than
laryngotracheitis. (See 'Differential diagnosis' below.)
EVALUATION
During the evaluation, efforts should be made to make the child as comfortable as possible.
The increased inspiratory effort that accompanies anxiety and fear in young children can
exacerbate subglottic narrowing, further diminishing air exchange and oxygenation. (See
'Pathogenesis' above.)
In addition, the child's hydration status should be assessed. Moderate to severe croup may
be associated with decreased oral intake and increased insensible losses from fever and
tachypnea, resulting in dehydration. (See "Clinical assessment and diagnosis of hypovolemia
(dehydration) in children".)
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/croup-clinical-features-evaluation-and-diagnosis/print?search=laringite aguda&source=search_result&select… 8/43
17/01/2023 15:42 Croup: Clinical features, evaluation, and diagnosis - UpToDate
Once treatment is underway and the child is more stable, the remainder of the evaluation
can proceed.
History — The history should include a description of the onset, duration, and progression
of symptoms. Factors that are associated with increased severity of illness include:
Aspects of the history that are helpful in distinguishing croup from other causes of acute
upper airway obstruction include [24,47]:
● Fever – The absence of fever from onset of symptoms to the time of presentation is
suggestive of spasmodic croup or other noninfectious etiology of stridor (eg, subglottic
cyst, subglottic hemangioma, foreign body aspiration).
● Barking cough – The classic physical finding in a patient with subglottic narrowing is a
barky, seal-like cough.
● Throat pain – Complaints of dysphagia and sore throat are more common in children
with epiglottitis than croup (approximately 60 to 70 versus <10 percent) [47].
The differential diagnosis of croup is discussed in greater detail below. (See 'Differential
diagnosis' below.)
noninfectious causes of acute upper airway obstruction, both of which are necessary in
making management decisions.
The initial examination often can be accomplished by observing the child in a comfortable
position with the caretaker. Every effort should be made to measure the child's weight and
vital signs.
● Mild croup (Westley croup score ≤2) – Children with mild croup have a barking cough,
hoarse cry, no stridor at rest (although stridor may be present when upset or crying),
and either no or only mild chest wall/subcostal retractions [24,49,50].
● Moderate croup (Westley croup score 3 to 7) – Children with moderate croup have
stridor at rest. They have at least mild retractions and may have other symptoms or
signs of respiratory distress but little or no agitation [24,49,50].
● Severe croup (Westley croup score ≥8) – Children with severe croup have significant
stridor at rest, although the loudness of the stridor may decrease with worsening
upper airway obstruction and decreased air entry [24,49,50]. Retractions are severe
(including indrawing of the sternum), and the child may appear anxious, agitated, or
pale and fatigued.
● Impending respiratory failure (Westley croup score ≥12) – Croup occasionally results
in significant upper airway obstruction with impending respiratory failure, heralded by
the following signs [24,49,50]:
Croup clinical scores are widely used in clinical practice and in studies evaluating the efficacy
of different treatments for croup. However, it is important to understand that these scores
are somewhat subjective and there can be substantial interobserver variability [51,52].
Alternative objective methods have been proposed as potentially more reliable measures of
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/croup-clinical-features-evaluation-and-diagnosis/print?search=laringite aguda&source=search_result&selec… 10/43
17/01/2023 15:42 Croup: Clinical features, evaluation, and diagnosis - UpToDate
croup severity (eg, methods for quantitatively measuring pulsus paradoxus) [53,54].
Additional data are needed to validate these quantitative methods and demonstrate that
they perform better than croup scores before they can replace them in clinical practice. In
the meantime, the Westley croup score remains a useful guide for assessing severity of
illness and responses to therapies.
Prompt recognition and treatment of children with severe croup are paramount, as
discussed separately. (See "Management of croup", section on 'Moderate to severe croup'.)
Assessing for other causes — Components of the physical examination that are useful in
distinguishing croup from other causes of acute upper airway obstruction and respiratory
distress include [47,49]:
● Preferred posture – Children with epiglottitis usually prefer to sit up in the "tripod" or
"sniffing position" (neck is mildly flexed, and head is mildly extended) ( picture 5A-B).
● Quality of the voice – Children with croup may have a hoarse voice or diminished cry. A
muffled "hot-potato" voice is suggestive of epiglottitis, retropharyngeal abscess, or
peritonsillar abscess.
For most patients who have a clinical picture consistent with viral croup, direct
visualization of the epiglottis is not necessary and cautious examination of the child's
throat is sufficient. The approach to diagnosing epiglottitis, including which patients
should undergo attempts at direct visualization, is discussed separately. (See
"Epiglottitis (supraglottitis): Clinical features and diagnosis", section on 'Signs of
impending airway obstruction'.)
● Examination of the cervical lymph nodes, which can be enlarged in patients with
retropharyngeal or peritonsillar abscesses.
● Other physical findings may be present, depending on the particular inciting virus. As
an example, rash, conjunctivitis, exudative pharyngitis, and adenopathy are suggestive
of adenovirus infection.
● Otitis media (acute or with effusion) may be present as a primary viral or secondary
bacterial process.
The differential diagnosis of croup is discussed in greater detail below. (See 'Differential
diagnosis' below.)
Radiographs
In one study, greater degrees of narrowing of the trachea on a frontal or lateral plain
radiograph correlated with increased likelihood of hospitalization and longer hospital stay
[56].
Laboratory studies — Laboratory studies are rarely indicated in children with croup and are
of limited diagnostic utility.
Blood tests — The white blood cell count can be low, normal, or elevated; white blood cell
counts >10,000 cells/microL are common. Neutrophil or lymphocyte predominance may be
present on the differential [57,58]. A large number of band-form neutrophils is suggestive of
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/croup-clinical-features-evaluation-and-diagnosis/print?search=laringite aguda&source=search_result&selec… 12/43
17/01/2023 15:42 Croup: Clinical features, evaluation, and diagnosis - UpToDate
primary or secondary bacterial infection. Croup is not associated with any specific alterations
in serum chemistries, but children with dehydration may have low serum bicarbonate and/or
elevated blood urea nitrogen. (See "Clinical assessment and diagnosis of hypovolemia
(dehydration) in children", section on 'Laboratory testing'.)
DIAGNOSIS
Neither radiographs nor laboratory tests are necessary to make the diagnosis. However,
radiographs may be helpful in excluding other causes if the diagnosis is in question. (See
'Differential diagnosis' below.)
Testing for influenza is indicated if the results will influence decisions regarding treatment,
prophylaxis of contacts, or performance of other diagnostic tests; laboratory confirmation
should not delay the initiation of antiviral therapy for influenza when clinical and seasonal
considerations are compatible with influenza as the potential etiology of croup. (See
"Seasonal influenza in children: Management", section on 'Timing' and "Seasonal influenza
in children: Clinical features and diagnosis", section on 'Whom to test'.)
Diagnosis of a specific viral etiology can be made with rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR),
rapid antigen testing, or viral culture of secretions from the nasopharynx. Multiplex tests (eg,
respiratory viral panel), which simultaneously assess the presence of multiple agents in one
specimen (typically using PCR), are widely available [59,60]. The diagnosis of specific viral
infections is discussed in detail in individual topic reviews:
● Influenza (see "Seasonal influenza in children: Clinical features and diagnosis", section
on 'Diagnosis')
● Respiratory syncytial virus (see "Respiratory syncytial virus infection: Clinical features
and diagnosis", section on 'Laboratory confirmation')
RECURRENT CROUP
A child who has recurrent episodes of classic viral croup may have an underlying condition
that predisposes him or her to develop clinically significant narrowing of the upper airway.
Recurrent episodes of croup-like symptoms occurring outside of the typical age range for
"viral croup" (ie, six months to three years) and recurrent episodes that do not appear to be
simple "spasmodic croup" should raise suspicion for airway lesions, gastroesophageal reflux
or eosinophilic esophagitis, or atopic conditions [39,40,42,61-64]. (See 'Differential diagnosis'
below.)
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
The differential diagnosis of croup includes other causes of stridor and/or respiratory
distress. (See "Assessment of stridor in children", section on 'Causes of stridor'.)
The primary considerations are those with acute onset (particularly those that may rapidly
progress to complete upper airway obstruction) and those that require specific therapy.
Underlying anatomic anomalies of the upper airway also must be considered since they may
contribute to more severe disease. (See 'Host factors' above.)
● Foreign body – In foreign body aspiration, there often is a history of the sudden onset
of choking and symptoms of upper airway obstruction in a previously healthy child. If
an inhaled foreign body lodges in the larynx, it will produce hoarseness and stridor. If a
large foreign body is swallowed, it may lodge in the upper esophagus, resulting in
distortion of the adjacent soft extrathoracic trachea and producing a barking cough
and inspiratory stridor. Ingestion of a nonobstructive but subsequently erosive foreign
bodies such as a button battery may produce stridor more remote from the time of
ingestion that persists or recurs [66]. (See "Airway foreign bodies in children" and
"Foreign bodies of the esophagus and gastrointestinal tract in children".)
● Upper airway injury – Injury to the airway from smoke or thermal or chemical burns
should be evident from the history. The child typically does not have fever or a viral
prodrome. (See "Inhalation injury from heat, smoke, or chemical irritants".)
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Croup".)
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the
Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th
grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have
about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview
and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are
longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th
grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are
comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to
print or email these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on
a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword[s] of interest.)
● Clinical presentation – Symptoms usually begin with nasal discharge, congestion, and
coryza and progress over 12 to 48 hours to include fever, hoarseness, barking cough,
and stridor. Respiratory distress increases as upper airway obstruction becomes more
severe. Croup is usually a self-limited illness, and the cough typically resolves within
three days. (See 'Clinical presentation' above.)
● Rapid assessment – The objectives of the evaluation of the child with croup include
assessment of severity ( table 1) (calculator 1) and exclusion of other causes of upper
airway obstruction. Rapid assessment of general appearance, vital signs, pulse
oximetry, airway stability, and mental status are necessary to identify children with
severe respiratory distress and/or impending respiratory failure. (See 'Evaluation' above
and 'Rapid assessment and initial management' above.)
● Diagnosis – Croup is diagnosed clinically, based upon the characteristic barking cough
and stridor. Neither radiographs nor laboratory tests are necessary to make the
diagnosis. However, radiographs may be helpful in excluding other causes if the
diagnosis is in question ( image 1A-B). (See 'Diagnosis' above and 'Differential
diagnosis' above.)
● Recurrent croup – Recurrent episodes of croup-like symptoms that are atypical for
simple croup (ie, severe or prolonged symptoms) or that occur outside of the typical
age range (ie, earlier than six months or beyond age five or six years) should raise
suspicion for another underlying condition (eg, airway lesions ( table 2),
gastroesophageal reflux, eosinophilic esophagitis, atopic conditions). Children with
recurrent croup should be referred to an otolaryngologist for further evaluation. (See
'Recurrent croup' above and "Assessment of stridor in children".)
REFERENCES
1. Tovar Padua LJ, Cherry JD. Croup (laryngitis, laryngotracheitis, spasmotic croup, laryngot
racheobronchitis, bacterial tracheitis, and laryngotracheobranchopneumonitis) and epig
lottitis (supraglottitis). In: Feigin and Cherry's Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases,
8th Ed, Cherry JD, Harrison GJ, Kaplan SL, Steinbach WJ, Hotez PJ (Eds), Elsevier, Philadelp
hia 2019. p.175.
2. Thompson M, Vodicka TA, Blair PS, et al. Duration of symptoms of respiratory tract
infections in children: systematic review. BMJ 2013; 347:f7027.
3. Cherry JD. The treatment of croup: continued controversy due to failure of recognition
of historic, ecologic, etiologic and clinical perspectives. J Pediatr 1979; 94:352.
4. Hide DW, Guyer BM. Recurrent croup. Arch Dis Child 1985; 60:585.
5. Hanna R, Lee F, Drummond D, Yunker WK. Defining atypical croup: A case report and
review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 127:109686.
8. Counihan ME, Shay DK, Holman RC, et al. Human parainfluenza virus-associated
hospitalizations among children less than five years of age in the United States. Pediatr
Infect Dis J 2001; 20:646.
9. Weinberg GA, Hall CB, Iwane MK, et al. Parainfluenza virus infection of young children:
estimates of the population-based burden of hospitalization. J Pediatr 2009; 154:694.
10. Frost HM, Robinson CC, Dominguez SR. Epidemiology and clinical presentation of
parainfluenza type 4 in children: a 3-year comparative study to parainfluenza types 1-3. J
Infect Dis 2014; 209:695.
11. Gu YE, Park JY, Lee MK, Lim IS. Characteristics of human parainfluenza virus type 4
infection in hospitalized children in Korea. Pediatr Int 2020; 62:52.
12. Venn AMR, Schmidt JM, Mullan PC. Pediatric croup with COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med
2021; 43:287.e1.
13. Peterson K, Patel J, Collier C, Chan SB. SARS-CoV-2 and croup, not a rare coincidence. Am
J Emerg Med 2022; 57:175.
14. Murata Y, Tomari K, Matsuoka T. Children With Croup and SARS-CoV-2 Infection During
the Large Outbreak of Omicron. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2022; 41:e249.
16. Sharma S, Agha B, Delgado C, et al. Croup Associated With SARS-CoV-2: Pediatric
Laryngotracheitis During the Omicron Surge. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2022; 11:371.
17. Kuypers J, Martin ET, Heugel J, et al. Clinical disease in children associated with newly
described coronavirus subtypes. Pediatrics 2007; 119:e70.
18. Sung JY, Lee HJ, Eun BW, et al. Role of human coronavirus NL63 in hospitalized children
with croup. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010; 29:822.
19. van der Hoek L, Sure K, Ihorst G, et al. Croup is associated with the novel coronavirus
NL63. PLoS Med 2005; 2:e240.
21. Sippy R, Prado EO, Pizarro Fajardo F, et al. Medically Attended Outpatient Coronavirus
Infections in Ecuadorean Children During the 20 Months Preceding Countrywide
Lockdown Related to the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic of 2020. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2020;
39:e291.
22. Døllner H, Risnes K, Radtke A, Nordbø SA. Outbreak of human metapneumovirus
infection in norwegian children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004; 23:436.
23. Denny FW, Murphy TF, Clyde WA Jr, et al. Croup: an 11-year study in a pediatric practice.
Pediatrics 1983; 71:871.
24. Cherry JD. Clinical practice. Croup. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:384.
26. Hanna J, Brauer PR, Morse E, et al. Epidemiological analysis of croup in the emergency
department using two national datasets. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019;
126:109641.
27. Segal AO, Crighton EJ, Moineddin R, et al. Croup hospitalizations in Ontario: a 14-year
time-series analysis. Pediatrics 2005; 116:51.
28. Rosychuk RJ, Klassen TP, Metes D, et al. Croup presentations to emergency departments
in Alberta, Canada: a large population-based study. Pediatr Pulmonol 2010; 45:83.
29. Pruikkonen H, Dunder T, Renko M, et al. Risk factors for croup in children with recurrent
respiratory infections: a case-control study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009; 23:153.
30. Salzman MB, Filler HF, Schechter CB. Passive smoking and croup. Arch Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg 1987; 113:866.
31. Lee DR, Lee CH, Won YK, et al. Clinical characteristics of children and adolescents with
croup and epiglottitis who visited 146 Emergency Departments in Korea. Korean J
Pediatr 2015; 58:380.
32. Marx A, Török TJ, Holman RC, et al. Pediatric hospitalizations for croup
(laryngotracheobronchitis): biennial increases associated with human parainfluenza
virus 1 epidemics. J Infect Dis 1997; 176:1423.
33. DAVISON FW. Acute laryngeal obstruction in children. J Am Med Assoc 1959; 171:1301.
34. Davison FW. Acute obstructive laryngitis in children. Penn Med J 1950; 53:250.
36. MORGAN EA, WISHART DE. Laryngotracheo-bronchitis (a statistical review of 549 cases).
Can Med Assoc J 1947; 56:8.
37. Orton HB, Smith EL, Bell HO, et al. Acute laryngotracheobronchitis: analysis of sixty-two
cases with report of autopsies in eight cases. Arch Otolaryngol 1941; 33:926.
40. Delany DR, Johnston DR. Role of direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy in recurrent
croup. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152:159.
43. Van Bever HP, Wieringa MH, Weyler JJ, et al. Croup and recurrent croup: their association
with asthma and allergy. An epidemiological study on 5-8-year-old children. Eur J Pediatr
1999; 158:253.
46. Welliver RC, Wong DT, Middleton E Jr, et al. Role of parainfluenza virus-specific IgE in
pathogenesis of croup and wheezing subsequent to infection. J Pediatr 1982; 101:889.
47. Tibballs J, Watson T. Symptoms and signs differentiating croup and epiglottitis. J
Paediatr Child Health 2011; 47:77.
48. Westley CR, Cotton EK, Brooks JG. Nebulized racemic epinephrine by IPPB for the
treatment of croup: a double-blind study. Am J Dis Child 1978; 132:484.
49. Alberta Clinical Practice Guidelines Guideline Working Group. Guidelines for the diagnos
is and management of croup. Available at: www.topalbertadoctors.org/download/252/cr
oup_guideline.pdf (Accessed on March 13, 2015).
50. Clarke M, Allaire J. An evidence-based approach to the evaluation and treatment of
croup in children. Pediatr Emerg Med Pract 2012; 9:1.
51. Chan A, Langley J, Leblanc J. Interobserver variability of croup scoring in clinical practice.
Paediatr Child Health 2001; 6:347.
52. Khemani RG, Schneider JB, Morzov R, et al. Pediatric upper airway obstruction:
interobserver variability is the road to perdition. J Crit Care 2013; 28:490.
53. Steele DW, Santucci KA, Wright RO, et al. Pulsus paradoxus: an objective measure of
severity in croup. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:331.
54. Arnold DH, Wang L, Hartert TV. Pulse Oximeter Plethysmograph Estimate of Pulsus
Paradoxus as a Measure of Acute Asthma Exacerbation Severity and Response to
Treatment. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23:315.
55. Mills JL, Spackman TJ, Borns P, et al. The usefulness of lateral neck roentgenograms in
laryngotracheobronchitis. Am J Dis Child 1979; 133:1140.
56. Yang WC, Hsu YL, Chen CY, et al. Initial radiographic tracheal ratio in predicting clinical
outcomes in croup in children. Sci Rep 2019; 9:17893.
57. Cherry JD. Newer respiratory viruses: their role in respiratory illnesses of children. In: Ad
vances in Pediatrics, Vol 20, Schulman I (Ed), Mosby Year Book, Chicago 1973. p.225.
58. Denny FW, Clyde WA Jr. Acute lower respiratory tract infections in nonhospitalized
children. J Pediatr 1986; 108:635.
59. McCulloh RJ, Andrea S, Reinert S, Chapin K. Potential Utility of Multiplex Amplification
Respiratory Viral Panel Testing in the Management of Acute Respiratory Infection in
Children: A Retrospective Analysis. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2014; 3:146.
60. Couturier MR, Barney T, Alger G, et al. Evaluation of the FilmArray® Respiratory Panel
for clinical use in a large children's hospital. J Clin Lab Anal 2013; 27:148.
61. Duval M, Tarasidis G, Grimmer JF, et al. Role of operative airway evaluation in children
with recurrent croup: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Otolaryngol 2015; 40:227.
62. Rankin I, Wang SM, Waters A, et al. The management of recurrent croup in children. J
Laryngol Otol 2013; 127:494.
63. Jabbour N, Parker NP, Finkelstein M, et al. Incidence of operative endoscopy findings in
recurrent croup. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144:596.
64. Chun R, Preciado DA, Zalzal GH, Shah RK. Utility of bronchoscopy for recurrent croup.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009; 118:495.
66. Gohil R, Culshaw J, Jackson P, Singh S. Accidental button battery ingestion presenting as
croup. J Laryngol Otol 2014; 128:292.
Topic 6002 Version 34.0
GRAPHICS
(A) Endoscopic view of the larynx and subglottic airway seen from above the vocal cords in a
child with viral croup. The vocal cords are swollen, there is marked subglottic swelling
(arrow), and the opening of subglottic airway is narrow.
(A) Subglottic hemangioma (arrow) seen from above the vocal cords. There is near-complete obstruction
the subglottic airway.
AC: arytenoid cartilage; AF: aryepiglottic fold; E: epiglottis; VC: vocal cord.
Panel B is reproduced with permission from: Nagdev A. Airway, breathing, circulation: Normal airway. In: Greenberg's Text-Atlas o
Emergency Medicine, Greenberg MI, Hendrickson RG, Silverberg M, et al (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2005.
Copyright © 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. www.lww.com.
Inpatient
admission is
generally
required unless
marked
improvement
occurs after
treatment with
glucocorticoid
and nebulized
epinephrine
Intensive care
unit admission is
generally
required
Consultation
with
anesthesiologist
or ENT surgeon
may be
warranted to
arrange for
intubation in a
controlled
setting
* The IV preparation of dexamethasone (4 mg per mL) can be given orally; mix with flavored
syrup.
References:
1. Westley CR, Cotton EK, Brooks JG. Nebulized racemic epinephrine by IPPB for the treatment of croup: a double-
blind study. Am J Dis Child 1978; 132:484.
2. Toward Optimized Practice (TOP) Working Group for Croup. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of
croup (revised 2008). Available at www.topalbertadoctors.org/download/252/croup_guideline.pdf (Accessed on
March 13, 2015).
3. Clarke M, Allaire J. An evidence-based approach to the evaluation and treatment of croup in children. Pediatric
Emergency Medicine Practice 2012; 9:1.
Reproduced with permission from: Fleisher GR, Ludwig W, Baskin MN. Atlas of
Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2004.
Copyright © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Malformation Characteristics
Laryngeal webs 75% located in the glottic area. Complete webs cause
respiratory distress at birth and partial webs produce
stridor, weak cry, and different degrees of respiratory
distress. Associated anomalies are common.
Trachea ¶ Tracheal stenosis Usually presents with stridor or both stridor and
wheezing. If stenosis is significant, respiratory distress
occurs.
Bronchi and Bronchogenic May occur at any point throughout the tracheobronchial
distal airways ¶ cyst tree. Typically present during childhood with recurrent
coughing, wheezing, or pneumonia, but may become
symptomatic during infancy or adulthood or present as
an incidental finding on chest radiographs.
* Noise generated from the nose or pharynx is typically low in pitch and is referred to as snoring
or stertor.
¶ Noise generated from the trachea, bronchi, or distal airways is mostly wheezing.
References:
1. Nisa L, Holtz F, Sandu K. Paralyzed neonatal larynx in adduction. Case series, systematic review and analysis. Int J
Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77:13.
2. Holinger LD, Holinger PC, Holinger PH. Etiology of bilateral abductor vocal cord paralysis: a review of 389 cases.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85:428.
Infants
Inspirato
Cause and Preschool
School- strido
Neonate toddlers (3 to 5 Adolescents
aged
(6 to 24 years)
months)
Viral croup X X +
(laryngotracheitis) ¶
Spasmodic croup X X +
Bacterial X X X +
tracheitis ¶
Epiglottitis X X X +
Retropharyngeal X X +
abscess
Peritonsillar X X X +
abscess
Inducible laryngeal X X +
obstruction (vocal
cord dysfunction or
paradoxical vocal
cord motion)
Foreign body X X +
aspiration Δ
Anaphylaxis X X X X +
Airway burn X X X X +
Postextubation X X X X +
Therapeutic X X
hypothermia
Chronic
Congenital X X +/–
anomalies
Vocal cord X X X X X +
paralysis ¶
Subglottic stenosis X X X X X +
Tumor X X X X X +/–
Recurrent X X +
respiratory
papillomatosis
Hypocalcemic X X +/–
laryngeal spasm
+: usually present; +/–: may or may not be present; PICU: pediatric intensive care unit; URI: upper
respiratory tract infection.
* Any obstructive process that leads to a fixed airway narrowing will produce both inspiratory
and expiratory noise.
Δ Foreign body aspiration can occur in any age group but is most common in toddlers and
preschool-aged children.
Contributor Disclosures
Charles R Woods, MD, MS No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to
disclose. Anna H Messner, MD No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to
disclose. Sheldon L Kaplan, MD Grant/Research/Clinical Trial Support: MeMed Diagnostics [Bacterial
and viral infections];Merck [Staphylococcus aureus];Pfizer [Streptococcus pneumoniae].
Consultant/Advisory Boards: MeMed Advisory Board [Diagnostics bacterial and viral infections]. Other
Financial Interest: Elsevier [Pediatric infectious diseases];Pfizer [PCV13]. All of the relevant financial
relationships listed have been mitigated. Joshua Nagler, MD, MHPEd No relevant financial
relationship(s) with ineligible companies to disclose. Carrie Armsby, MD, MPH No relevant financial
relationship(s) with ineligible companies to disclose.
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these
are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for
references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all
authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.