This document provides guidelines for writing a review or critique of a scholarly work. It recommends spending 75% of the paper assessing the appropriateness of the methodology, coherence of ideas, and soundness of the explanation based on other information. The remaining 10% should include an overall impression and conclusion regarding the scholarly value, benefits to the audience or field, and suggestions for future research directions.
Original Description:
Original Title
Lesson 2 - Writing a Reaction Paper Review and Critique
This document provides guidelines for writing a review or critique of a scholarly work. It recommends spending 75% of the paper assessing the appropriateness of the methodology, coherence of ideas, and soundness of the explanation based on other information. The remaining 10% should include an overall impression and conclusion regarding the scholarly value, benefits to the audience or field, and suggestions for future research directions.
This document provides guidelines for writing a review or critique of a scholarly work. It recommends spending 75% of the paper assessing the appropriateness of the methodology, coherence of ideas, and soundness of the explanation based on other information. The remaining 10% should include an overall impression and conclusion regarding the scholarly value, benefits to the audience or field, and suggestions for future research directions.
Review/Critique arguments (75% of the • Coherence of ideas paper) • Soundness of explanation in relation to other available information
• Overall impression of the work
• Scholarly or literary value of the reviewed Conclusion (10% article, book, or work of the paper) • Benefits for the intended audience or field • Suggestion for future direction of research