Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LPCS
8 Jan 2023
0.0
Contents
1 General 4
1.1 Distribution and Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2 Airport Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.3 Runways and Declared Distances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.4 Radio Navigation Aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.5 Landing Aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.6 Approach Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.6.1 Instrument Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.6.2 Visual Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.7 Holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.8 Preferential Runway Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.8.1 Runway Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.9 Transition Altitude and Transition Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.10 Positions and Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.10.1 Cascais Aerodrome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.10.2 Adjacent Positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.11 Transfers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.12 Separation Minima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.13 Flight Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.13.1 VFR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.13.2 IFR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.14 Low Visibility Procedures (LVP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2 Ground (GND) 19
2.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.2 Area of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.3 Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.1 Flight Plan validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.2 Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.3 Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.4 Arrivals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.5 Stand assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.3.6 Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.3.7 Engine run-ups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.4 Phraseology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3 Tower (TWR) 28
3.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.2 Area of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3.3 Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.3.1 VFR Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.3.2 IFR Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.3.3 Arrivals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.3.4 Circuits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3.3.5 Working Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3.3.6 Night VFR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.3.7 Reduced Runway Separation Minima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.3.8 Go arounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.3.9 VFR Helicopters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.3.10 Heliports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.3.11 Radar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3.3.12 Phraseology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3.3.12.1 Circuits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3.3.12.2 Working Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.3.12.3 Departure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.3.12.4 Arrival . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
A Callsigns 39
SOP LPCS P4
Chapter 1
General
The procedures laid here are of mandatory use while controlling on the Network and shall never be
adopted for real world use.
ICAO LPCS
IATA CAT
RWY Total
35 1350
1400x30
17 1540
Departures from intersections are allowed. Declared distances from intersections not published.
35
1 1
17
1
RNP and VOR circle-to-land available
Approach only available to Approach Category A and B aircraft. Available to Category C aircraft if able to
comply with speed limitations as published on the approach chart.
Circling approaches can perform circling to the West or to the East. Circling to the West allows for a
lower minima proving useful if weather so dictates. Circling East allows for a simpler Missed Approach
Procedure and is usually the preferred option, weather allowing. Regardless, either option can be used
at any time as operationally advantageous.
During IFR arrivals, VFR traffic in the runway circuit must be instructed to proceed to and orbit over
A-POINT, B-POINT, C-POINT or D-POINT, irrespective of being fixed wing or helicopter. Traffic in working
areas must maintain at maximum 1000 feet. These restrictions apply until the IFR arrival is on the ground
and unlikely to perform a missed approach
1.7 Holdings
In case of calm or cross winds, refer to the weather forecast to determine which runway to use and avoid
unnecessary runway changes.
Try to plan ahead as much as possible to avoid a runway change in a period of high traffic. Weather
forecasts and tools to see VATSIM traffic are a good help.
QNH From 942.2 From 959.5 From 977.2 From 995.1 From From 1031.7
to 959.4 to 977.1 to 995.0 to 1013.2 1013.3 to 1050.3
to 1031.6
TL 70 65 60 55 50 45
CTRLI LPPT_TWR Lisboa Tower 118.100 Lisboa CTR; LPJB Algés Heliport
ARRLI LPPT_F Lisboa Arrival 125.125 VFR tunnels with RWY02 in use
APP
ZFIS LPAM_CTR Lisboa Informa- 123.750 Sintra MCTR and MCTA when Sintra closed
tion
1.11 Transfers
From To Conditions/Remarks
TWR LPPT_APP VFR: Reaching Cova do Vapor at 1000 feet. Instruct to Monitor,
unless flight has a requested related (ie: requesting LPMT)
IFR: Passing 2000 feet
• 3Nm
If the filled route is not acceptable, but the controller is able to correct it without undue workload, correct it
and advise the pilot via private message of the new route.
If the filled route is not acceptable to the point the controller does not have the ability to correct it or
provide a valid one, inform the pilot via private message and request the pilot to refile.
Note In some circumstances the pilot may report that a new flight plan
was filled, but it does not show to the controller. This is due to the
flight plan entering a locked state where the pilot can no longer
update it. Either request the new flight plan details via private
message, or request the pilot to reconnect to the network.
1.13.1 VFR
Local traffic will file CCAIS as the only route element. This covers both working areas and aerodrome
circuit.
Departures shall file either Cabo da Roca (CROCA) departing north or Cova do Vapor (CVAPO) departing
south. South departures must plan via Lisboa TMA VFR tunnels.
Helicopters proceeding through Lisboa CTR shall plan according to VFR Helicopter routes. Priority
helicopters are exempt.
1.13.2 IFR
Departures must begin their route at a point associated with an SID, or at CAS.
Lower airways and DCT (DCT max Higher airways and DCT (DCT DCT (no max distance)
300nm) max 300nm)
Domestic flights’ route must end at a point associated with a STAR or an Instrument Approach IAF (Initial
Approach Fix).
LECM flights must then route via airways, or DCT if leaving northbound via a point West of ADORO.
GMMM flights must then route via airways or DCT (max 75nm).
Chapter 2
Ground (GND)
2.1 General
Transponder should be STBY during ground movements.
If there is the need for the pilot to hold short of any position, issue the taxi instruction until that position,
no further.
Do not issue conflicting taxi clearances. If two taxi routes cross each other, the second pilot should be
given a holding instruction. It is also important to keep pilots informed of traffic that will cross and who
has priority.
Departures have priority over arrivals regarding taxi/pushback. Sometimes it can be better to give priority
to the arrival to ease traffic flow.
Taxiway K and especially J are a common hotspot, as K is often used by departures from runway 17
while arrivals need to be instructed to vacate the runway elsewhere, and J for the same reason, plus it
being the only taxiway that has access to Apron E. It is paramount to know when departures begin their
taxi out of Apron E, so that it is possible to instruct an arrival to Apron E an alternative route in due time.
2.3 Procedures
The below procedures are considered as standard and no coordination is required to employ them,
except where explicitly required.
Should a situation arise that does not match any of the below cases, coordinate an arrangement with the
affected agencies.
• Navigation equipment code letter present in accordance with VATSIM internal equipment list
REFERENCE. Add or correct if needed (VATSIM will update this in the near future);
2.3.2 Departures
When RWY35 in use, ACFT shall taxi to the holding point for departure and be instructed to hold short of
runway. Traffic needing to cross the runway should do so at J. Aircraft larger than a Piper Seneca shall
be instructed to backtrack on runway 35 in lieu of taxiing via F.
When RWY17 in use, ACFT shall taxi to the holding point for departure and hold short of runway. Pilots
shall be instructed to backtrack either via F or K unless the pilot requests an intersection departure.
2.3.3 Departures
The positions to cross are taxiways J and R.
2.3.4 Arrivals
Arrivals are to vacate:
Pay attention to the availability of taxiways considering departures, and instruct accordingly.
Instructing arrivals to “taxi to the apron” is most times sufficient. However if a situation where specifying
the apron or the stand is beneficial (ie: foreign pilots), such should be done.
Apron A
• Sevenair (Airline)
• Sevenair maintenance
Apron B
• Sevenair Academy
• Aeroclube de Portugal
• Other Aeroclubs
Apron C
Apron D
• Business Jets: D01 or as close as possible. Do not use D01 for larger than Learjet 45 to avoid
wingspan issues
Apron E
• Pelicano
• Helibravo
• Heliportugal
2.3.6 Restrictions
Do not issue startup clearance before successfully coordinating flights that require so.
Traffic intending to perform circuits or working areas that can not be accepted due to other traffic shall be
informed of an approximate new time to attempt startup.
TAXIWAYS
Taxiway F width 8 meters. Consider unusable for any traffic larger than Piper Seneca.
• Apron D;
2.4 Phraseology
For phraseology details refer to Lisboa SOP.
The only difference is the inclusion of the initial climb on the departure clearance.
ATC Aircraft
[readback]
Note Consider omitting initial climb for Runway 17, so as to not induce
the pilot in error of commiting a level bust. With Runway 17 the
climb will stop at 2000 feet until radial 220.
ATC Aircraft
[clearance request]
Note VFR traffic will typically be smaller aircraft that might need to start
their engines right away. Be ready to transmit the clearance at a
later stage, such as just before or during taxi.
ATC Aircraft
ATC Aircraft
[readback]
ATC Aircraft
[clearance request]
ATC Aircraft
2.4.6 Taxi
ATC Aircraft
Note ATC Should wait for the plane to report ready for departure at the
holding point
ATC Aircraft
Chapter 3
Tower (TWR)
3.1 General
Cascais is very different from other towers as the traffic is much more varied, in speeds flown, navigation
equipment, even intentions and type of flights. There is no standard minimum departure interval. Instead,
ICAO separation shall be provided.
Cascais CTR is neighboured by Sintra MCTR and MCTA to the north, and Lisboa CTR to the east. Lisboa
Approach sits atop of the CTR.
It is important to monitor flights to ensure they do not enter Sintra MCTR accidentally.
3.3 Procedures
The below procedures are considered as standard and no coordination is required to employ them,
except where explicitly required.
Should a situation arise that does not match any of the below cases, coordinate an arrangement with the
affected agencies.
Consider that every piston aircraft needs to perform a runup at the runway holding point. Request to
report ready for departure.
Most of the traffic at LPCS will be Light Wake Turbulence category, and as there is no separation provision
in between Light aircraft, the most typical criteria applied will be as per ICAO 4444 Chapter 7 Section
7.9.2.
Always observe ICAO Wake Turbulence Separation Minima and apply it, if greater.
If there is any communication to be made that requires a readback, such as a modification of departure
clearance, do not issue take-off clearance without the correct readback.
Traffic intending to practice approaches at Sintra or Montijo shall be coordinated with the relevant unit
before start-up clearance is issued. Coordination shall be initiated by the start-up request.
Departures climb to 3000ft (IFR departures from runway 17 on the ESP1M departure must maintain
2000ft until 14DME CAS).
Observe that there will be no conflict with nearby VFR traffic, and give traffic information as appropriate.
Wait until the departure has cleared the VFR traffic by at least 1000ft and then initiate the handoff to
Approach.
3.3.3 Arrivals
Arrivals will be cleared at 1500 feet at either Cabo da Roca or Farol do Bugio.
Traffic arriving from outside the CTR or the working areas shall be given runway in use, wind and QNH
on first contact, as well as arrival instructions.
Keep in mind the availability of taxiways to instruct the pilot where to vacate in due time, if a conflict is
possible to occur.
3.3.4 Circuits
Departures will be cleared to climb to 1000 feet.
Departures performing local circuits may have their departure instructions omitted, unless a non-standard
instruction is required. By omission, fixed wing aircraft will join the western circuit, and helicopters join
the right circuit, both at 1000 feet.
If needed, the other circuit may be used by any type of aircraft, and even at 1500 feet if needed, as long
as the traffic is explicitly cleared as such.
VFR can be deconflicted from IFR departures and arrivals typically by instructing to orbit abeam the
tower, or A, B, C or D point, or by extending their downwind, or by joining the opposite circuit.
Traffic requesting to perform a simulated engine failure should be cleared overhead the field at 1500 feet,
and orbit overhead or asked to report starting the procedure, depending on traffic conditions.
Most common techniques for managing traffic on circuits involve extending downwinds, joining a different
circuit, orbiting over a position (often abeam tower, but also on any of the reporting points if so needed),
and using 1500 feet (often used by VFR traffic on a simulated instrument approach that terminates in a
circle to land).
Typically each working area is occupied by a single aircraft at a time. However if both aircraft involved
accept, the area can be shared between them.
Guincho and Cabo Raso areas can be extended higher with coordination with Lisboa Approach. Cabo
Raso can extend up to 3000 feet. Guincho can extend as high as Approach can accommodate.
During an IFR departure or arrival, traffic in working areas shall be instructed to descend to 1000 feet
until clear of traffic. This covers the case of a missed approach.
Traffic approaching the working area will report reaching and the altitude block they intend to occupy.
Request to report for leaving. Continue providing traffic information while the flight is inside the working
area, namely when other traffic is flying to a neighbour area or Cabo da Roca.
When the flight intends to leave the area it will request landing instructions, or similar. Treat the flight as
any other arrival (see 3.2.3 Arrivals - REFERENCE).
Maximum 3 aircraft in the traffic pattern, excluding other arrivals. There are no other differences for night
time circuit patterns.
Only 1 Cabo da Roca and 1 Cova do Vapor departure authorized at a time. Cabo da Roca at 4000 feet,
Cova do Vapor at 3000 feet. Coordination with Lisboa Approach shall be done initially at start-up request,
and a release must be obtained just before issuing take-off clearance.
3.3.8 Go arounds
In case of an instrument approach results in a go around, the published missed approach is the following:
The missed approach procedure crosses the western circuit, with potential conflicts at A and B point and
on all working areas, depending on the aircraft performance and where the initial turn is performed.
Inform Approach and when passing 2000 feet, transfer the aircraft to Lisboa Approach 119.100
(LPPT_APP). Failure to do so may result in the loss of separation between aircraft on the missed
approach and the aircraft on the SID, as well as with the remaining LPPT traffic.
Do not modify the procedure right away for the following reasons:
• Changing the cleared altitude may conflict with the departures and/or arrivals.
Do not forget to apply wake turbulence separation between the missed approach and ensuing departing
aircraft.
Workload permitting, for helicopters destination LPJB Algés, attempt to coordinate with Lisboa Tower a
release such that the helicopter reports on final with Cascais Tower.
3.3.10 Heliports
CASCAIS HOSPITAL LPHC
VFR Medical emergency flights. Approach Direction: 346º / Take Off Direction:166º
Request arrivals to report final. When reporting final, instruct to report on the ground, and to report again
before departure.
3.3.11 Radar
Cascais Tower is equipped with radar based surveillance, which is used to help provide separation, traffic
information and assist in situational awareness. Due to the entire CTR sitting below the Minimum Radar
Vectoring Altitude, it is not possible to use it to provide radar vectors.
Except for traffic in the circuit, all departing and arriving traffic should be radar identified as soon as
possible. Departures shall have their data tag transferred on handoff.
3.3.12 Phraseology
3.3.12.1 Circuits
ATC Aircraft
[Readback]
[Downwind report]
[Readback]
[callsign] [final report]
ATC Aircraft
[Reaching report]
[Readback]
([Traffic information])
[Leaving request]
[Readback]
3.3.12.3 Departure
ATC Aircraft
Identified [handoff]
[Readback]
3.3.12.4 Arrival
ATC Aircraft
[Readback]
Appendix A
Callsigns