Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Berkovits
Naomi Berkovits
ENGL 120
14 June 2022
Asimov and Shulman discuss how the world is filled with many people, talents, and
outlooks. Unfortunately, society only values academic intelligence and those with other
addresses how, though he grew up as someone who people considered exceptionally bright, he
lacks practical knowledge. He explains how there are many talents possessed by those who
outshine him in certain areas and how their intelligence is equally important. Furthermore, in
“Love is a Fallacy,” Shulman presents a character who finds that, despite his intelligence, he is
unable to romance a girl and make her his wife. These works show that in fact, academicians
are not only equally smart as rest of society but can potentially be missing valuable nuances in
life.
academic intelligence as the only valuable type of intelligence. In reality, there are people with
various kinds of intelligence. In “What is Intelligence, Anyway?” Asimov relates how his success
in academics made him feel smart. He, in turn, expected others to consider him as such (1).
Asimov explains how when his car broke, he depended greatly on the knowledge of the
mechanic to help him out. Asimov writes that he “always took for granted that [he] was far
more intelligent” than the mechanic, until he was helplessly waiting at the repair shop. He
2
Berkovits
admits that if he was given a test created by a carpenter, farmer, or repairman, he’d “be a
moron, too” (Asimov 2). Society neglects to value the intelligence of anyone other than an
academician.
While Asimov shows that intelligence cannot replace practical knowledge, in "Love is a
Fallacy," Max Shulman shows that although intelligence is valuable, it can’t take the place of
emotions. The narrator in “Love is a Fallacy” is a pretentious boy who tries to win over a girl
through logic. He wants her for “shrewdly calculated, entirely cerebral reasons” (Shulman 2).
He hoped to smarten her up so she can be his wife once he became a lawyer. The narrator
would take her out for dinner and teach her logical fallacies until she was up to his standards.
When the time came, he made a calculated decision to switch his relationship “from academic
to romantic” (Shulman 7). This plan failed to succeed since love and romance can’t be switched
on logically. Despite his confidence in being “a giant intellect,” his smarts failed him when it
strength. Asimov recounts when his repairman told him a clever joke. The repairman was
educated, doc, I knew you couldn’t be very smart” (Asimov 2). The repairman understood that
people with that kind of brain would not be able to think out of box. Similarly, in “Love is a
Fallacy,” the narrator learns that he lost his girl to Petey Bellows when he failed to incorporate
his emotions into the relationship. Petey was “dumb as an ox” and followed the crowd. He was
desperate for the latest fad, a raccoon coat. The narrator exchanged his raccoon coat with
Petey for the right to date his girl, Polly. When Polly rejected him and said she preferred Petey,
3
Berkovits
the narrator was utterly confused. She then explained that it was because “he’s got a raccoon
coat” (Shulman 8) and that’s all she was really looking for. The boy that he scoffed at eventually
These writings illustrate the misconception that academically inclined people are
smarter and more important than the average person. Sometimes, their logical and systematic
way of thinking can hinder their ability to tap into things that come naturally for others. The
proud, educated, and philosophical man might not be able to fix a car or romance a girl. Most
importantly, society should begin noticing and appreciating people with other types of intellect,