ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.

com™

Like 2 Tweet Share 1

Search

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1990 > December 1990 Decisions > [G.R. No. 30616 : December
10, 1990.] 192 SCRA 110 EUFRACIO D. ROJAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA, Defendant-
Appellee.:

Custom Search
Search

SECOND DIVISION
[G.R. No. 30616 : December 10, 1990.]
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review 192 SCRA 110
EUFRACIO D. ROJAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA,
Defendant-Appellee.

DECISION

PARAS, J.:

DebtKollect Company, Inc.
ChanRobles Intellectual Property
Division
This is a direct appeal to this Court from a decision ** of the then Court of First
Instance of Davao, Seventh Judicial District, Branch III, in Civil Case No. 3518,
dismissing appellant's complaint.
As found by the trial court, the antecedent facts of the case are as follows:
On January 14, 1955, Maglana and Rojas executed their Articles of Co-Partnership
(Exhibit "A") called Eastcoast Development Enterprises (EDE) with only the two of
them as partners. The partnership EDE with an indefinite term of existence was duly
registered on January 21, 1955 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
One of the purposes of the duly-registered partnership was to "apply or secure timber
and/or minor forests products licenses and concessions over public and/or private
forest lands and to operate, develop and promote such forests rights and concessions."
(Rollo, p. 114).
A duly registered Articles of Co-Partnership was filed together with an application for a
timber concession covering the area located at Cateel and Baganga, Davao with the
Bureau of Forestry which was approved and Timber License No. 35-56 was duly issued
and became the basis of subsequent renewals made for and in behalf of the duly
registered partnership EDE.
Under the said Articles of Co-Partnership, appellee Maglana shall manage the business
affairs of the partnership, including marketing and handling of cash and is authorized
to sign all papers and instruments relating to the partnership, while appellant Rojas
shall be the logging superintendent and shall manage the logging operations of the
partnership. It is also provided in the said articles of co-partnership that all profits and
losses of the partnership shall be divided share and share alike between the partners.
During the period from January 14, 1955 to April 30, 1956, there was no operation of
said partnership (Record on Appeal [R.A.] p. 946).
Because of the difficulties encountered, Rojas and Maglana decided to avail of the
services of Pahamotang as industrial partner.

December-1990 Jurisprudence
[G.R. No. 32945 : December 3, 1990.] MARIANO T.
NASSER, Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS,
HON. MALCOLM SARMIENTO, in his capacity as
Presiding Judge, Court of First Instance of Pampanga,
Branch I, AURORA RIVERA CANLAS, PATERNO R.
CANLAS, and TOMAS CENTILLAS, Respondents. [G.R.
No. 32946. December 3, 1990.] MARIANO T. NASSER,
Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, PATERNO R.
CANLAS, AURORA RIVERA-CANLAS, TOMAS
CENTILLAS and THE CHIEF OF POLICE OF SAN
ISIDRO, DAVAO ORIENTAL, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 39430 : December 3, 1990.] FRANCISCO
MANLAPAZ, DELFIN SANGCAP, DOMINGO SANGCAP,
PEDRO CUNANAN, FAUSTO DE LA PENA and
HONORATA DE LA PENA, Petitioners, vs. HON. COURT
OF APPEALS, HON. JUDGE LORENZO R. MOSQUEDA,
HON. JUDGE VIRGILIO CANIVEL, TEODORO RIVERA,
PABLO RIVERA, RENATO RIVERA and BONIFACIO
RIVERA, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 55466 : December 3, 1990.] MANILA
SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC., Petitioner, vs. COURT
OF APPEALS and WILLIAM H. QUASHA, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 78778 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA
814 LEONIDA CORONADO, FELIX BUENO, MELANIA
RETIZOS, BERNARDINO BUENASEDA and JOVITA
MONTEFALCON, Petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF
APPEALS and JUANA BUENO ALBOVIAS, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 79560 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA
823 ANDRES E. DITAN, Petitioner, vs. PHILIPPINE
OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ASIAWORLD RECRUITMENT, INC.,
AND/OR INTRACO SALES CORPORATION,
Respondents.
[G.R. No. 80904 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA
830 BALTAZAR, PEDRO, URSULA, and DOMINGO, all
surnamed PANTIG, Petitioners, vs. VENANCIO
BALTAZAR, Respondent.
[G.R. No. 82115 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA
836 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. ROMEO ORTIZ y BALLARES, Accused-Appellant.
[G.R. No. 84884 : December 3, 1990.] EULALIO M.
RUIZ and ILUMINADA RUIZ, Petitioners, vs. HON.
DOROTEO N. CANEBA, THE CITY SHERIFF OF MANILA
AND/OR HIS DEPUTIES, ZENAIDA SANGALANG and
ADOLFO CRUZ, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 87264 : December 3, 1990.] MARIANO
DINGLASAN and FELICIDAD DINGLASAN, Petitioners,
vs. THE HON. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, Presiding
Judge of Branch 159, Regional Trial Court, Pasig,
Metro Manila, National Capital Judicial Region, The
GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, and
CONCEPCION T. TINIO, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 89545 : December 3, 1990.] SPOUSES
ROLANDO DOLORFINO and MONINA FULE,
Petitioners, vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS,
SEVERO ALCOS and EFIGENIA DE LUNA-ALCOS,
Respondents.
On March 4, 1956, Maglana, Rojas and Agustin Pahamotang executed their Articles of
Co-Partnership (Exhibit "B" and Exhibit "C") under the firm name EASTCOAST
DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES (EDE). Aside from the slight difference in the purpose of
the second partnership which is to hold and secure renewal of timber license instead of
to secure the license as in the first partnership and the term of the second partnership
is fixed to thirty (30) years, everything else is the same.
The partnership formed by Maglana, Pahamotang and Rojas started operation on May
1, 1956, and was able to ship logs and realize profits. An income was derived from the
proceeds of the logs in the sum of P643,633.07 (Decision, R.A. 919).
On October 25, 1956, Pahamotang, Maglana and Rojas executed a document entitled
"CONDITIONAL SALE OF INTEREST IN THE PARTNERSHIP, EASTCOAST DEVELOPMENT
ENTERPRISE" (Exhibits "C" and "D") agreeing among themselves that Maglana and
Rojas shall purchase the interest, share and participation in the Partnership of
Pahamotang assessed in the amount of P31,501.12. It was also agreed in the said
instrument that after payment of the sum of P31,501.12 to Pahamotang including the
amount of loan secured by Pahamotang in favor of the partnership, the two (Maglana
and Rojas) shall become the owners of all equipment contributed by Pahamotang and
the EASTCOAST DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES, the name also given to the second
partnership, be dissolved. Pahamotang was paid in fun on August 31, 1957. No other
rights and obligations accrued in the name of the second partnership (R.A. 921).
After the withdrawal of Pahamotang, the partnership was continued by Maglana and
Rojas without the benefit of any written agreement or reconstitution of their written
Articles of Partnership (Decision, R.A. 948).
On January 28, 1957, Rojas entered into a management contract with another logging
enterprise, the CMS Estate, Inc. He left and abandoned the partnership (Decision, R.A.
947).
On February 4, 1957, Rojas withdrew his equipment from the partnership for use in
the newly acquired area (Decision, R.A. 948).
The equipment withdrawn were his supposed contributions to the first partnership and
was transferred to CMS Estate, Inc. by way of chattel mortgage (Decision, R.A. p.
948).
On March 17, 1957, Maglana wrote Rojas reminding the latter of his obligation to
contribute, either in cash or in equipment, to the capital investments of the
partnership as well as his obligation to perform his duties as logging superintendent.
Two weeks after March 17, 1957, Rojas told Maglana that he will not be able to comply
with the promised contributions and he will not work as logging superintendent.
Maglana then told Rojas that the latter's share will just be 20% of the net profits. Such
was the sharing from 1957 to 1959 without complaint or dispute (Decision, R.A. 949). : nad
Meanwhile, Rojas took funds from the partnership more than his contribution. Thus, in
a letter dated February 21, 1961 (Exhibit "10") Maglana notified Rojas that he
dissolved the partnership (R.A. 949).
On April 7, 1961, Rojas filed an action before the Court of First Instance of Davao
against Maglana for the recovery of properties, accounting, receivership and damages,
docketed as Civil Case No. 3518 (Record on Appeal, pp. 1-26).
Rojas' petition for appointment of a receiver was denied (R.A. 894).
Upon motion of Rojas on May 23, 1961, Judge Romero appointed commissioners to
examine the long and voluminous accounts of the Eastcoast Development Enterprises
(Ibid., pp. 894-895).
The motion to dismiss the complaint filed by Maglana on June 21, 1961 (Ibid., pp. 102-
114) was denied by Judge Romero for want of merit (Ibid., p. 125). Judge Romero also
required the inclusion of the entire year 1961 in the report to be submitted by the
commissioners (Ibid., pp. 138-143). Accordingly, the commissioners started examining
the records and supporting papers of the partnership as well as the information
furnished them by the parties, which were compiled in three (3) volumes.
On May 11, 1964, Maglana filed his motion for leave of court to amend his answer with
counterclaim, attaching thereto the amended answer (Ibid., pp. 26-336), which was
granted on May 22, 1964 (Ibid., p. 336).
On May 27, 1964, Judge M.G. Reyes approved the submitted Commissioners' Report
(Ibid., p. 337).
On June 29, 1965, Rojas filed his motion for reconsideration of the order dated May
27, 1964 approving the report of the commissioners which was opposed by the
appellee.
On September 19, 1964, appellant's motion for reconsideration was denied (Ibid., pp.
446-451).
A mandatory pre-trial was conducted on September 8 and 9, 1964 and the following
issues were agreed upon to be submitted to the trial court:
(a) The nature of partnership and the legal relations of Maglana and Rojas after
the dissolution of the second partnership;
(b) Their sharing basis: whether in proportion to their contribution or share and
share alike;
(c) The ownership of properties bought by Maglana in his wife's name;
(d) The damages suffered and who should be liable for them; and
 [UDK No. 9864 : December 3, 1990.] RUFINA VDA.
DE TANGUB, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS,
PRESIDING JUDGE of the [CAR] RTC, Branch 4, Iligan
City, and SPOUSES DOMINGO and EUGENIA MARTIL,
Respondents.
[G.R. No. 58668 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 1
SANTIAGO ESCARTE, JR., ERNESTO VILLANUEVA,
FELIXBERTO VILLANUEVA, and LOURDES
VILLANUEVA, Petitioners, vs. OFFICE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES and TEODORO
MEDINA, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 71929 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 9
ALITALIA, Petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE
COURT and FELIPA E. PABLO, Respondents.
192 SCRA 21 CONSOLACION VILLANUEVA,
Petitioner, vs. THE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE
COURT, JESUS BERNAS and REMEDIOS Q. BERNAS,
Respondents.
[G.R. No. 80505 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 28
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. MARIO TANDOY y LIM, Defendant-Appellant.
[G.R. No. 80791 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 34
PEOPLE'S FINANCING CORP. and ENRIQUE V.
ARCENAS, Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS
(Sixteenth Division), GAUDIOSO MANLIGUEZ and
PURIFICACION MANLIGUEZ, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 86586 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 42
NATIONAL IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, vs. HONORABLE TEODORO P. REGINO,
PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH
84, QUEZON CITY and CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF
AUSTRALIA-PHILIPPINES INC., Respondents.
[G.R. No. 86889 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 51
LUZ FARMS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN
REFORM, Respondent.
[G.R. No. 88177 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 84
DOLORES A. PAREDES, Petitioner, vs. CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION AND REMEDIOS A. AMOR, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 89530 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 84
DOLORES A. PAREDES, Petitioner, vs. CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
AND REMEDIOS A. AMOR, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 93054 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA
100 Cordillera Regional Assembly Member
ALEXANDER P. ORDILLO, (Banaue), Ifugao Provincial
Board Member CORAZON MONTINIG, (Mayoyao),
Former Vice-Mayor MARTIN UDAN (Banaue),
Municipal Councilors MARTIN GANO, (Lagawe), and
TEODORO HEWE, (Hingyon), Barangay Councilman
PEDRO W. DULAG (Lamut); Aguinaldo residents
SANDY B. CHANGIWAN, and DONATO TIMAGO; Lamut
resident REY ANTONIO; Kiangan residents ORLANDO
PUGUON, and REYNAND DULDULAO; Lagawe
residents TOMAS KIMAYONG, GREGORIO DANGO,
GEORGE B. BAYWONG, and VICENTE LUNAG; Hingyon
residents PABLO M. DULNUAN and CONSTANCIO
GANO; Mayoyao residents PEDRO M. BAOANG,
LEONARDO IGADNA, and MAXIMO IGADNA; and
Banaue residents PUMA-A CULHI, LATAYON BUTTIG,
MIGUEL PUMELBAN, ANDRES ORDILLO, FEDERICO
MARIANO, SANDY BINOMNGA, GABRIEL LIMMANG,
ROMEO TONGALI, RUBEN BAHATAN, MHOMDY
GABRIEL, and NADRES GHAMANG, Petitioners, vs. THE
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS; The Honorable
FRANKLIN M. DRILON, Secretary of Justice; Hon.
CATALINO MACARAIG, Executive Secretary; The
Cabinet Officer for Regional Development; Hon.
GUILLERMO CARAGUE, Secretary of Budget and
Management; and Hon. ROSALINA S. CAJUCOM, OIC,
National Treasurer, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 30616 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
110 EUFRACIO D. ROJAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA, Defendant-Appellee.
[G.R. No. 36827 : December 10, 1990.] THE
DIRECTOR OF FOREST ADMINISTRATION, THE
DIRECTOR OF LANDS and THE REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs. HON. RAMON C.
FERNANDEZ, HERMOGENES CONCEPCION, JR., and
EMILIO A. GANCAYCO, ET AL., Respondents. [G.R. No.
56622 : December 10, 1990.] THE DIRECTOR OF
LANDS and THE DIRECTOR OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT,
Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS (Ninth Division),
GREGORIO A. LEGASPI and VALENTINA CERVANIA,
Respondents. [G.R. No. 70076 : December 10, 1990.]
REYNALDA ESPEJO, BENITA GARLITOS and
ENRIQUETA OXCIANO, Petitioners, vs. INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE COURT, HON. ANTONIO M. BELEN, as
Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Lingayen,
Pangasinan Branch XXXVIII and ASTERIO SAURA,
Respondents.
[G.R. No. 44749 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
141 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. MELVIN GIRON y SANTOS, Accused-Appellant.
[G.R. No. 50661 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
151 RUBEN DELFIN, BENITO DOLOSA, CORNELIO
AGUILAR, ANASTACIO GORDOLA, CESAR PANALIGAN,
LUIS VIESCA, VICENTE GUADAMOR, JUAN CAGATIN,
SIMEON CHICA, REYNALDO CINCO, WILFREDO IPAS,
SIMEON TAGAYONA, FLORENCIO SINAMBAN,
(e) The legal effect of the letter dated February 23, 1961 of Maglana dissolving
the partnership (Decision, R.A. pp. 895-896). - nad
After trial, the lower court rendered its decision on March 11, 1968, the dispositive
portion of which reads as follows:
"WHEREFORE, the above facts and issues duly considered, judgment is hereby
rendered by the Court declaring that:
"1. The nature of the partnership and the legal relations of Maglana and Rojas
after Pahamotang retired from the second partnership, that is, after August 31,
1957, when Pahamotang was finally paid his share — the partnership of the
defendant and the plaintiff is one of a de facto and at will;
"2. Whether the sharing of partnership profits should be on the basis of
computation, that is the ratio and proportion of their respective contributions,
or on the basis of share and share alike — this covered by actual contributions
of the plaintiff and the defendant and by their verbal agreement; that the
sharing of profits and losses is on the basis of actual contributions; that from
1957 to 1959, the sharing is on the basis of 80% for the defendant and 20%
for the plaintiff of the profits, but from 1960 to the date of dissolution, February
23, 1961, the plaintiff's share will be on the basis of his actual contribution and,
considering his indebtedness to the partnership, the plaintiff is not entitled to
any share in the profits of the said partnership;
"3. As to whether the properties which were bought by the defendant and
placed in his or in his wife's name were acquired with partnership funds or with
funds of the defendant and — the Court declares that there is no evidence that
these properties were acquired by the partnership funds, and therefore the
same should not belong to the partnership;
"4. As to whether damages were suffered and, if so, how much, and who
caused them and who should be liable for them — the Court declares that
neither parties is entitled to damages, for as already stated above it is not a
wise policy to place a price on the right of a person to litigate and/or to come to
Court for the assertion of the rights they believe they are entitled to;
"5. As to what is the legal effect of the letter of defendant to the plaintiff dated
February 23, 1961; did it dissolve the partnership or not — the Court declares
that the letter of the defendant to the plaintiff dated February 23, 1961, in
effect dissolved the partnership;
"6. Further, the Court relative to the canteen, which sells foodstuffs, supplies,
and other merchandise to the laborers and employees of the Eastcoast
Development Enterprises, — the COURT DECLARES THE SAME AS NOT
BELONGING TO THE PARTNERSHIP;
"7. That the alleged sale of forest concession Exhibit 9-B, executed by Pablo
Angeles David — is VALID AND BINDING UPON THE PARTIES AND SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED AS PART OF MAGLANA'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE PARTNERSHIP;
"8. Further, the Court orders and directs plaintiff Rojas to pay or turn over to
the partnership the amount of P69,000.00 the profits he received from the CMS
Estate, Inc. operated by him;
"9. The claim that plaintiff Rojas should be ordered to pay the further sum of
P85,000.00 which according to him he is still entitled to receive from the CMS
Estate, Inc. is hereby denied considering that it has not yet been actually
received, and further the receipt is merely based upon an expectancy and/or
still speculative;
"10. The Court also directs and orders plaintiff Rojas to pay the sum of
P62,988.19 his personal account to the partnership;
"11. The Court also credits the defendant the amount of P85,000.00 the
amount he should have received as logging superintendent, and which was not
paid to him, and this should be considered as part of Maglana's contribution
likewise to the partnership; and
"12. The complaint is hereby dismissed with costs against the plaintiff. : rd
"SO ORDERED." Decision, Record on Appeal, pp. 985-989).
Rojas interposed the instant appeal.
The main issue in this case is the nature of the partnership and legal relationship of
the Maglana-Rojas after Pahamotang retired from the second partnership.
The lower court is of the view that the second partnership superseded the first, so that
when the second partnership was dissolved there was no written contract of co-
partnership; there was no reconstitution as provided for in the Maglana, Rojas and
Pahamotang partnership contract. Hence, the partnership which was carried on by
Rojas and Maglana after the dissolution of the second partnership was a de facto
partnership and at will. It was considered as a partnership at will because there was no
term, express or implied; no period was fixed, expressly or impliedly (Decision, R.A.
pp. 962-963).
On the other hand, Rojas insists that the registered partnership under the firm name
of Eastcoast Development Enterprises (EDE) evidenced by the Articles of Co-
Partnership dated January 14, 1955 (Exhibit "A") has not been novated, superseded
and/or dissolved by the unregistered articles of co-partnership among appellant Rojas,
appellee Maglana and Agustin Pahamotang, dated March 4, 1956 (Exhibit "C") and
accordingly, the terms and stipulations of said registered Articles of Co-Partnership
(Exhibit "A") should govern the relations between him and Maglana. Upon withdrawal
FERMINIO DIEGO, POLICARPIO DILE, EDDIE DE
CASTRO, AQUILINO CABILITASAN, CRISOGONO
CANTERO, GUALBERTO REBUSTER, RODOLFO
GATCHALIAN, ANGELITO DOMINGO, FERNANDO
JOVER, RAFAEL SALCEDO, SIMON DIANA, BENJAMIN
GONZALES, JR., BENIGNO ROJA, DEMETRIO SIMEON,
JOSE TELAN, HILARIO VILLANUEVA, NICK
FRANCISCO, PACIFICO DALIPE, EUPEMIO DALITE,
ARTEMIO DE CASTRO, ISABELO RASTICA, ANECITO
RASTICA, LAMBERTO NIETO, ESMERALDO TATEL,
PASCUAL BATOCTOY, ESMENIO PATRICIO, ARMANDO
DE GUZMAN, JESUS MALLARI, JOSE MALLARI,
SULPICIO MALLARI, GENEROSO COS, AGAPITO
ESPINOSA, VIRGILIO SEVAÑES, RICARDO MANZAN,
OSCAR BENSOL, PABLO DIAGSAY, EMILIO DIAGSAY,
PAULINO COMETA, MATERO COREA, BENJAMIN
LACANARIA, GAUDY TIU, JOVENCIO AGUILAR,
ROMULO POSADA, RICARDO POSIC, ALFONSO
SALGADO, RICARDO TAGANAP, ARMANDO RAMIREZ,
FELIPE RAMIRES, EDELBERTO BERNARDO, PONCIANO
MONTILLA, JUAN MONTILLA, IGNACIO PANCHITO,
JEORGE SERRAN, VICTOR IGNIS, LUCAS IGAT,
BARTOLOME MAGDAEL, AUGUSTO ROSALINAS,
RAFAEL SOCITO, JORGE CO, LUCINO WAGAN, CELSO
BARADA, WINSTON DIENZO, PAULINO SANCHEZ,
ELESEO SANCHES, CONRADO SANCHES, GENEROSO
ANTONIO, AGUSTIN LOPEZ, RUDY SOCITO, SEGUNDO
SOCITO, JOAQUIN PARAS, DOMINADOR BUTAHON,
GERMOGENES GINGCO, HONORIO DETOITO, ELIGIO
MENDOZA, RUBEN QUITORIANO, LEON DELA CRUZ,
PACITO SALES, ANTONIO CEMANES, IRENEO
LUBUGIN, FORTUNATO MATO, ROMEO MERIC,
ALBERTO GALLO, MELCHOR SALGADO, SIMEON
QUIJANO, ANTONIO CARAAN, CARLITO GUZMAN,
ALBERTO SALMON, FELIMON TAN, FERNANDO
FAUSTINO, CONRADO DAVID, REYNALDO NOLASCO,
ANTONIO NIETO, JAIME CAMACHO, ALBERTO
PANGLAO, ROSAURO GANAC, ALFREDO ARCABIO,
PEDRO MANASALA, VICENTE BELARMINO, ROMULO
SIOCO, SEVERINO ATIENZA, JR., RUFO ABALOS,
JESUS POSADA, ALBINO BACARRO, ERNESTO DAJAY,
WILFREDO VILLALON, CELESTINO BACARRO, MANUEL
TOLENTINO, ERNESTO ANTONIO, OSCAR ABUNDIO,
ZOSIMO IJARES, RUBEN ARISTORENAS, GAUDENCIO
CASTILLO, DOMINGO DELA TORRE, DANILO
RONCADA, RAFEL PUPA, ALFONSO SAPINORO,
LUISITO JACRIQUE, MARCELINO BESA, ANSELMO
DATELES, ALBERTO PALCULAN, BIENVENIDO
FUENSALIDA AND JOSE ORZAL, Petitioners, vs. THE
HON. AMADO G. INCIONG in his capacity as Deputy
Minister of Labor; NLRC Commissioners DIEGO
ATIENZA, CLETO VILLATUYA and GERONIMO
QUADRA; ATLANTIC CONTAINER CORPORATION;
INLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., LAZARO ARRIOLA,
BIENVENIDO KATALBAS, AURORA JEREZA, GOSHI DE
YULO AND PAZ YULO AND ROBERTO JACINTO,
Respondents.
[G.R. No. 55361 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
163 SPOUSES TEOFILO ERCILLO and TERESITA
ERCILLO, Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and
SPOUSES LUTGARDA CIFRA and BENJAMIN CIFRA,
SR., represented by their son and attorney-in-fact,
BENJAMIN CIFRA, JR., and HON. JOSE P. CASTRO,
Respondents.
[G.R. No. 55613 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
169 ERNESTO DICHOSO, Petitioner, vs. The
HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and TEODOLFO
RAMOS, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 56620 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
177 FILIPINAS MILLS, INC., BUENAVENTURA TAN and
VIRGINIA DUMLAO-TAN, Petitioners, vs. HON.
ABELARDO M. DAYRlT, in his capacity as Presiding
Judge of the Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch
II, ASSOCIATED CITIZENS BANK and OSCAR V.
ATAYDE, in his capacity as the Deputy Sheriff of the
CFI-Manila, Branch II, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 69863-65 : December 10, 1990.] 192
SCRA 183 LINO BROCKA, BENJAMIN CERVANTES,
COSME GARCIA, RODOLFO SANTOS, VALENTINO
SALIPSIP, RICARDO VEGA, ERIC MARIANO, JOSE
EMMANUEL OYALES, RONNIE MATTA, ALFREDO VIAJE,
RUBEN EUGENIO, REYNALDO ORTIZ, ORLANDO
ORTIZ, NOEL REYES, EDUARDO IMPERIAL, NESTOR
SARMIENTO, FRANCO PALISOC, VIRGILIO DE
GUZMAN, ALBERTO REYES, JESSIE PINILI, ROMULO
AUGUIS, DOMINADOR RESURRECION III, RONNIE
LAYGO, ROSAURO ROQUE, CLARENCE SORIANO,
OCTAVO DEPAWA, CARLITO LA TORRE, SEVERNO
ILANO, JR., DOMINGO CAJIPE, ALAN ALEGRE, RAMON
MARTINEZ, MA. GILDA HERNANDEZ, EDNA P.
VILLANUEVA, DOLLY S. CANU, MELQUIADES C.
ATIENZA, ELIGIO P. VERA CRUZ, ROGER C. BAGAN,
ABUNDIO M. CALISTE, Petitioners, vs. JUAN PONCE
ENRILE, MAJ. GENERAL FIDEL V. RAMOS, BRIG.
GENERAL PEDRO BALBANERO, COL. ABAD, COL.
DAWIS, SERGIO APOSTOL, P/LT, RODOLFO M.
GARCIA and JUDGE RICARDO TENSUAN, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 74762 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
191 COMMERCIAL MOTORS CORPORATION,
Petitioner, vs. COMMISSIONERS, SECOND DIVISION,
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, and
PEDRO UMLAS, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 78163 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
199 ANGELINA P. SANTIAGO, Petitioner, vs. The
Honorable DEPUTY EXECUTIVE SECRETARY and HI-
CEMENT CORPORATION, Respondents.
of Agustin Pahamotang from the unregistered partnership (Exhibit "C"), the legally
constituted partnership EDE (Exhibit "A") continues to govern the relations between
them and it was legal error to consider a de facto partnership between said two
partners or a partnership at will. Hence, the letter of appellee Maglana dated February
23, 1961, did not legally dissolve the registered partnership between them, being in
contravention of the partnership agreement agreed upon and stipulated in their
Articles of Co-Partnership (Exhibit "A"). Rather, appellant is entitled to the rights
enumerated in Article 1837 of the Civil Code and to the sharing profits between them
of "share and share alike" as stipulated in the registered Articles of Co-Partnership
(Exhibit "A").
After a careful study of the records as against the conflicting claims of Rojas and
Maglana, it appears evident that it was not the intention of the partners to dissolve the
first partnership, upon the constitution of the second one, which they unmistakably
called an "Additional Agreement" (Exhibit "9-B") (Brief for Defendant-Appellee, pp. 24-
25). Except for the fact that they took in one industrial partner; gave him an equal
share in the profits and fixed the term of the second partnership to thirty (30) years,
everything else was the same. Thus, they adopted the same name, EASTCOAST
DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES, they pursued the same purposes and the capital
contributions of Rojas and Maglana as stipulated in both partnerships call for the same
amounts. Just as important is the fact that all subsequent renewals of Timber License
No. 35-36 were secured in favor of the First Partnership, the original licensee. To all
intents and purposes therefore, the First Articles of Partnership were only amended, in
the form of Supplementary Articles of Co-Partnership (Exhibit "C") which was never
registered (Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant, p. 5). Otherwise stated, even during the
existence of the second partnership, all business transactions were carried out under
the duly registered articles. As found by the trial court, it is an admitted fact that even
up to now, there are still subsisting obligations and contracts of the latter (Decision,
R.A. pp. 950-957). No rights and obligations accrued in the name of the second
partnership except in favor of Pahamotang which was fully paid by the duly registered
partnership (Decision, R.A., pp. 919-921).
On the other hand, there is no dispute that the second partnership was dissolved by
common consent. Said dissolution did not affect the first partnership which continued
to exist. Significantly, Maglana and Rojas agreed to purchase the interest, share and
participation in the second partnership of Pahamotang and that thereafter, the two
(Maglana and Rojas) became the owners of equipment contributed by Pahamotang.
Even more convincing, is the fact that Maglana on March 17, 1957, wrote Rojas,
reminding the latter of his obligation to contribute either in cash or in equipment, to
the capital investment of the partnership as well as his obligation to perform his duties
as logging superintendent. This reminder cannot refer to any other but to the
provisions of the duly registered Articles of Co-Partnership. As earlier stated, Rojas
replied that he will not be able to comply with the promised contributions and he will
not work as logging superintendent. By such statements, it is obvious that Roxas
understood what Maglana was referring to and left no room for doubt that both
considered themselves governed by the articles of the duly registered partnership.
Under the circumstances, the relationship of Rojas and Maglana after the withdrawal of
Pahamotang can neither be considered as a De Facto Partnership, nor a Partnership at
Will, for as stressed, there is an existing partnership, duly registered.
As to the question of whether or not Maglana can unilaterally dissolve the partnership
in the case at bar, the answer is in the affirmative.
Hence, as there are only two parties when Maglana notified Rojas that he dissolved the
partnership, it is in effect a notice of withdrawal.
Under Article 1830, par. 2 of the Civil Code, even if there is a specified term, one
partner can cause its dissolution by expressly withdrawing even before the expiration
of the period, with or without justifiable cause. Of course, if the cause is not justified
or no cause was given, the withdrawing partner is liable for damages but in no case
can he be compelled to remain in the firm. With his withdrawal, the number of
members is decreased, hence, the dissolution. And in whatever way he may view the
situation, the conclusion is inevitable that Rojas and Maglana shall be guided in the
liquidation of the partnership by the provisions of its duly registered Articles of Co-
Partnership; that is, all profits and losses of the partnership shall be divided "share and
share alike" between the partners.
But an accounting must first be made and which in fact was ordered by the trial court
and accomplished by the commissioners appointed for the purpose.
On the basis of the Commissioners' Report, the corresponding contribution of the
partners from 1956-1961 are as follows: Eufracio Rojas who should have contributed
P158,158.00, contributed only P18,750.00 while Maglana who should have contributed
P160,984.00, contributed P267,541.44 (Decision, R.A. p. 976). It is a settled rule that
when a partner who has undertaken to contribute a sum of money fails to do so, he
becomes a debtor of the partnership for whatever he may have promised to contribute
(Article 1786, Civil Code) and for interests and damages from the time he should have
complied with his obligation (Article 1788, Civil Code) (Moran, Jr. v. Court of Appeals,
133 SCRA 94 [1984]). Being a contract of partnership, each partner must share in the
profits and losses of the venture. That is the essence of a partnership (Ibid., p. 95).
Thus, as reported in the Commissioners' Report, Rojas is not entitled to any profits. In
their voluminous reports which was approved by the trial court, they showed that on
50-50% basis, Rojas will be liable in the amount of P131,166.00; on 80-20%, he will
be liable for P40,092.96 and finally on the basis of actual capital contribution, he will
be liable for P52,040.31.
Consequently, except as to the legal relationship of the partners after the withdrawal of
Pahamotang which is unquestionably a continuation of the duly registered partnership
 [G.R. No. 79962 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA and the sharing of profits and losses which should be on the basis of share and share
209 LUCIO R. CRUZ, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF
APPEALS AND CONRADO Q. SALONGA, Respondents. alike as provided for in the duly registered Articles of Co-Partnership, no plausible
reason could be found to disturb the findings and conclusions of the trial court. : nad

[G.R. No. 80397 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

224 S & A GAISANO INCORPORATED, CANUTO CUPIN,
represented by his son Salvador P. Cupin as Attorney-
in-Fact; VICENTE CUPIN; EVARISTO CUPIN,
represented by his wife Marites R. Cupin as Attorney-
in-Fact; RAMON CUPIN; FE CUPIN and
BUENAVENTURA CUPIN, both represented by their
brother Ramon Cupin as Attorney-in-Fact, Petitioners,
vs. HON. VICENTE A. HIDALGO, Executive and
Presiding Judge of Regional Trial Court of Butuan City
and Agusan del Norte; Branch V, Region X; VICTOR
CHAN; ATTY. ARTURO RICAFORTE, in his capacity as
Register of Deeds of Butuan City; CITY ENGINEER
VICTORIOSO GO, in his capacity as National Building
Official of Butuan City, Respondents.
As to whether Maglana is liable for damages because of such withdrawal, it will be
recalled that after the withdrawal of Pahamotang, Rojas entered into a management
contract with another logging enterprise, the CMS Estate, Inc., a company engaged in
the same business as the partnership. He withdrew his equipment, refused to
contribute either in cash or in equipment to the capital investment and to perform his
duties as logging superintendent, as stipulated in their partnership agreement. The
records also show that Rojas not only abandoned the partnership but also took funds
in an amount more than his contribution (Decision, R.A., p. 949).
In the given situation Maglana cannot be said to be in bad faith nor can he be liable for
damages.

[G.R. No. 82215 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
232 ANTIPAZ PRESCO y PARAS, ANTONIO AMORES y
PARAS, and ANSELMA PARAS, Petitioners, vs. HON.
COURT OF APPEALS, HON. MARIANO UMALI, Judge of
the Regional Trial Court of Cavite, Branch 25, Trece
Martires City, HON. EDWINA P. MENDOZA, Judge of
the Municipal Trial Court of General Trias, Cavite,
PREMISES CONSIDERED, the assailed decision of the Court of First Instance of Davao,
Branch III, is hereby MODIFIED in the sense that the duly registered partnership of
Eastcoast Development Enterprises continued to exist until liquidated and that the
sharing basis of the partners should be on share and share alike as provided for in its
Articles of Partnership, in accordance with the computation of the commissioners. We
also hereby AFFIRM the decision of the trial court in all other respects.
: nad

MODESTO PARAS, and SIMPLICIO SANCHEZ,

Respondents. SO ORDERED.
[G.R. No. 82374 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA Melencio-Herrera, Sarmiento and Regalado, JJ., concur.
242 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. ERNESTO AVILA y MENDOZA AND JOHN DOE, Padilla, J., took no part.
Accused-Appellant.

[G.R. No. 82495 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

246 ALLIED BANKING CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. Endnotes
HON. SECRETARY SEDFREY ORDOÑEZ (Public
Respondent) and ALFREDO CHING (Private ** Penned by Judge Manases G. Reyes.
Respondent), Respondents.

[G.R. Nos. 84132-33 : December 10, 1990.] 192

SCRA 257 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND
NEW AGRIX, INC., Petitioners, vs. PHILIPPINE
VETERANS BANK, THE EX-OFFICIO SHERIFF and
GODOFREDO QUILING, in his capacity as Deputy
Sheriff of Calamba, Laguna, Respondents.
Back to Home | Back to Main
[G.R. No. 85531 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
266 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. AMANDO TASARRA and ABELARDO TASARRA,
QUICK SEARCH
Accused-Appellants.

[G.R. No. 89988 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

274 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. LYDIA RAMA, Defendant-Appellant. 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908

[G.R. No. 91041 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916
277 JOSE A. SADDUL, JR., Petitioner, vs. THE HON. 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924
COURT OF APPEALS and THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondents. 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932
1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
[A.M. No. P-86-32 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
288 ALFREDO LLANES, complainant, vs. GAUDIOSO 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
BORJA, DEPUTY SHERIFF, RTC, BRANCH 19, NAGA 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956
CITY, Respondent.
1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
[G.R. No. 31688 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
296 DIRECTOR OF LANDS, DIRECTOR OF FORESTRY
and REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs. 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
HON. JUAN P. AQUINO, as Judge of the Court of First 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
Instance of Abra, Second Judicial District and ABRA
INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, Respondents.
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
[G.R. No. 68514 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA
305 TRADERS ROYAL BANK, Petitioner, vs. HON.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and HON. 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
GREGORIO S. CENDAÑA, in his capacity as DIRECTOR
OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA PRODUCTION CENTER
(NMPC), Respondents

[G.R. No. 71589 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA

315 CAGAYAN DE ORO COLISEUM, INC., Petitioner, vs.
OFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF LABOR AND Main Indices of the Library ---> Go!
EMPLOYMENT, represented by Deputy Minister
VICENTE LEOGARDO, JR. and ANGEL CHAVES,
Respondents.

[G.R. No. 76303 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA

320 DIRECTOR OF LANDS, Petitioner, vs. SPOUSES
FRANCISCO K. REDOR and ANGELITA CASTRO, and
HON. SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN, JR., Presiding Judge
of the Regional Trial Court, Branch XXVII, Sta. Cruz,
Laguna, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 78623 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA

326 DR. OFELIA P. TRISTE, Petitioner, vs. LEYTE
STATE COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, namely: Hon.
Lourdes R. Quisumbing, Secretary of the Department
of Education, Culture and Sports and Chairman of the
Board and/or Dr. Minda C. Sutaria as the authorized
representative; Dr. Purificacion M. Flores, President of
the Leyte State College and Vice-Chairman of the
Board; Director Venancio Baclagon, National
Economic and Development Authority, Regional Office
No. VIII and Member of the Board; HON. SEDFREY A.
ORDOÑEZ, Secretary of Justice and Chairman of the
Review Committee under Executive Order No. 17; and
DR. CRES V. CHAN-GONZAGA, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 83530 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

342 CRISTITO AUSTRIA y RODIS, Petitioner-
Appellant, vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES and THE
HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents-
Appellees.

[G.R. No. 93867 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

358 SIXTO S. BRILLANTES, JR., Petitioner, vs.
HAYDEE B. YORAC, in her capacity as ACTING
CHAIRPERSON of the COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS,
Respondent.

[G.R. Nos. 95203-05 : December 18, 1990.] 192

SCRA 363 SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, Petitioner, vs.
ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB); MARCELO N.
FERNANDO, ALEJANDRO B. AFURONG; REX V.
TANTIONGCO; and OSCAR E. ALA, in their collective
official capacities as Chairman and Members of the
Board (ERB), respectively; CATALINO MACARAIG, in
his quadruple official capacities as Executive
Secretary, Chairman of Philippine National Oil
Company; Office of the Energy Affairs, and with
MANUEL ESTRELLA, in their respective official
capacities as Chairman and President of the Petron
Corporation; PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM
CORPORATION; with CESAR BUENAVENTURA and REY
GAMBOA as chairman and President, respectively;
CALTEX PHILIPPINES with FRANCIS ABLAN, President
and Chief Executive Officer; and the Presidents of
Philippine Petroleum Dealer's Association, Caltex
Dealer's Co., Petron Dealer's Asso., Shell Dealer's
Asso. of the Phil., Liquefied Petroleum Gas Institute
of the Phils., any and all concerned gasoline and
petrol dealers or stations; and such other persons,
officials, and parties, acting for and on their behalf; or
in representation of and/or under their authority,
Respondents. [G.R. Nos. 95119-21 : December 18,
1990.] 192 SCRA 363 OLIVER O. LOZANO, Petitioner,
vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB), PILIPINAS
SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, CALTEX (PHIL.),
INC., and PETRON CORPORATION, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 95263 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

374 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. JUVENAL KYAMKO, Accused-Appellant.

[A.C. No. 2756 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

381 PRUDENTIAL BANK, Petitioner, vs. BENJAMIN M.
GRECIA, Respondent.

[G.R. No. 44167 : December 19, 1990.] 192 SCRA

388 JULITA FRANCISCO and her husband,
HERMENEGILDO TANKENKO, and RESTITUTO
FRANCISCO and his wife, FELISA ABEJO, Petitioners,
vs. CRISPIN V. BAUTISTA, Judge of the Court of First
Instance of Bulacan; FRANCISCA FRANCISCO,
MAXIMA FRANCISCO and FRANCISCO FRANCISCO,
Respondents.

[G.R. Nos. 88710-13 : December 19, 1990.] 192

SCRA 396 UNION OF FILIPRO EMPLOYEES (UFE),
MANUEL L. SARMIENTO, BENJAMIN M. ALTAREJOS,
RODOLFO D. PAGLINAWAN, CARMELITA G. NUQUI,
CORAZON Y SAZON, RODRIGO P. LUCAS, RUDOLPH C.
ARMAS, EDUARDO A. ABELLA, ANGEL A. CANETE,
JUANITO T. CAPILI, ADOLFO S. CASTILLO, JR.,
PONCIANO A. CARINGAL, ERIBERTO S. LEONARDO,
ADELAIDA B. MIRA, EUGENIA C. NUÑEZ, PAZ B. SAN
JOSE, VENUSITO S. SOLIS, EMMANUEL S. VILLENA,
ALFONSO R. RICAFRENTE, MELANIO C. LANTIN,
AMADOR M. MONTOJO, RODOLFO M. MUNSOD,
RENATO P. DIAZ, RODRIGO M. URGELLES, CARLOS B.
SAN JOSE, EUSTAQUIO E. BUNYI, NELSON P.
CENTENO, SOTERO A. GACUTAN, GUILLERMO G. DE
BORJA, DIONISIO H. NIPALES, EUGENIO S. SAN
PEDRO, MANUEL DELA FUENTE, CARLO MEDINA,
CESAR B. PONCE, JORGE B. CASTRO, JR., RICARDO
AREVALO, REY M. BEO, FELIX ESGUERRA, REYNALDO
ALMENANZA, MELITON C. ROXAS (as represented by
his surviving spouse, MA. CORAZON ROXAS), ROMEO
A. ARANDELA, ISIDRO A. NATIVIDAD, EMILIANO M.
SAYAO, CELSO J. CENIDO, PAUL C. MEJARES,
SILVERIO C. PAMPANG, DIONISIO S. CANLOBO,
GILBERT C. NOBLE, RODOLFO D. CALONG-CALONG,
SR., PEPITO Q. QUITLONG, DIONISIO C. COMPLETO,
ANTONIO T. AVELINO, ANGELITO PAYABYAB, ISAIAS
A. RIEZA, DEODITO M. BELARMINO, QUEZON G.
MATEO, CARLITO PRE, CIPRIANO P. LUPEBA, EFREN
P. DINSAY, WILDON C. BARROS, SUSAN A. BERRO,
MANUEL A. LAVIN, ROY U. BACONGUIS, JEROME T.
FIEL, ANASTACIO G. CABALLERO, JR., ROGELIO E.
RAIZ, JOSE T. ISIDTO, ANGELITO M. ANICIETE, RAUL
ROBERTO C. NANQUIL, LIZA T. VILLANUEVA, CESAR S.
CRUZ, REYNALDO L. CALIGUIA, ERNESTO M.
SOLOMON, OSCAR G. AGUINALDO, DIEGO P. OLIVA,
JAIME D. NILLAS, ELPIDIO A. HERMOCILLA, DANTE L.
ESCOSURA, FEDERICO P. CONTEMPRATO, LAURO C.
MAKILING, RENATO O. MINDANAO, RAFAEL C. TURA
AND QUINTIN J. PEDRIDO, JR., Petitioners, vs.
NESTLÉ PHILIPPINES, INC., NATIONAL LABOR
RELATIONS COMMISSION, HON. EDUARDO G. MAGNO,
HON. ZOSIMO T. VASALLO and HON. EVANGELINE S.
LUBATON, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 91025 : December 19, 1990.] 192 SCRA

414 UNION OF FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, Petitioner, vs.
THE HONORABLE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION and NESTLE PHILIPPINES, INC.,
Respondents.

[G.R. No. 95478 : December 19, 1990.] 192 SCRA

430 EDUARDO ACOP, ROGER ALMENDAREZ,
BIENVENIDO AMBRAY, BENITO ARELLANO, WILLIAM
ARMENDARES, HERMINIO ARREZA, TEODORO
ARREZA, PEREGRINO BANGUIS, MOISES BARENG,
HIPOLITO BONGGOT, RAMON BUCALON, MELITO
BUENAVIDES, FELIX CAGONG, LORENZO CALIWATAN,
ANGEL CALUMBA, HENRY CARIAGA, GEORGE CASANO,
REYNALDO CAPUTOLAN, FELOMENO CHATO, JULIETO
CONGSIGNA, REYMUNDO CUADRA, EUFRONIO
CUBERO, BIENVENIDO CURAYAG, RUDICASTRO
CURAYAG, JOVENCIO DARAY, DAVID DE LEON,
NELSON ECHIN, ROLANDO ESCATRON, BERTINO
ESPINOLA, CRESENCIO FRANCIS, MATEO FRIAS,
RODOLFO FUENTES, BENEDICTO GALLOGO, HERMANO
GALOPE, JORGE GALVE, ERNESTO GONABO, VIRGILIO
GRUMO, JEMELITO GUBAL, RICARDO GUILLEN,
GENEROSO HERNANDEZ, JR., NELSON JABAY, EMILIO
JACINTO, EMELIANO JALA, JR., IGNACIO JURALBAR,
ALFREDO LOMOLJO, CELESTINO LOMOLJO, EDUARDO
LOPEZ, LUCIO LOPIO, SAMUEL LOREDO, NORBERTO
LORIA, MARCOS LOSIS, MARIO LUENGAS, NICOLAS
MAGHINAY, ROGELIO MATILDO, FLORANTE MIRANDA,
ANACLETO MONTON, NARCISO MONTON, ERNESTO
OROZCO, CHARLITO ORQUITA, MERLCHOR PANTO,
CASIMIRO PEREGRINO, EDUARDO PLAZA, NELSON
PLAZA, PAQUITO PLAZA, PEDRO PLAZA, FREDIOMIO
QUIÑONES, PEPE RAMIREZ, JOEL REMEDIO, EDUARDO
REVELLEZA, GERALDO ROSIL, JR., TEMESTOCLES
RUBENAL, REMEGIO SABUSIDO, ROGER SOTES,
BELTRANO SULLANO, JAIME SULLANO, ERNIE
TACUGDOY, WENIFREDO TOCMO, SR., PAQUITO
TRUGILLO, ANIOLITO URBIZTONDO, ROMARICO
URIARTE DARIO ORQUIZA, BERTINO VALLEJO,
FRANCISCO VEGA, CRESENCIO YPARRAGUIRRE, RUDY
YPARUAGUIRRI and EDUARDO SACRAGON, SR.,
Petitioners, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, (Fifth Division), SURIGAO
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SUDECOR) and RET.
GEN. REYNALDO G. DILAN, Vice President for Field
Operations & Administration, Respondents.

[A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 : December 19, 1990.] 192

SCRA 434 EFREN JAVIER and PEDRO JAVIER,
Complainants, vs. JUDGE SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN,
JR., Respondent.

[G.R. No. 46198 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

445 DOMINGO REYES, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
JUDGE SERAFIN

[G.R. No. 53556 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

454 LILIA AGUIRRE, GENATO AGUIRRE and BENITO
AGRAVA, Petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF
FIRST INSTANCE OF LEYTE, BRANCH III, EDUARDO
TAMPIL and LETICIA A. TAMPIL, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 72019 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

459 WORLD MACHINE ENTERPRISES, Petitioner, vs.
INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT AND J.R.
LITHOPLATES, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 81835 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

469 ROMEO J. ORDOÑEZ, Petitioner, vs. THE HON.
ALFREDO J. GUSTILO, in his capacity as presiding
judge of Regional Trial Court of Cavite, Branch XVI,
Cavite City, Municipality of Rosario, Cavite, former
Mayor Calixto D. Enriquez of Rosario, Cavite, and
Valeriano Espiritu of Mabolo, Bacoor, Cavite,
Respondents.

[G.R. No. 82002 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

478 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. FRANCISCO DE GUZMAN y DE DIOS, Accused-
Appellant.

[G.R. Nos. 86492-94 : December 20, 1990.] 192

SCRA 483 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. LEOPOLDO MONTANTE, Defendant-
Appellant.

[G.R. No. 88114 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

492 PENTAGON SECURITY and INVESTIGATION
AGENCY, Petitioner, vs. VICENTE T. JIMENEZ, ET AL.,
and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION,
SECOND DIVISION, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 89618 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

496 HON. RAUL S. MANGLAPUS, in his capacity as
Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Petitioner, vs. HON.
ANDRES E. MATIAS, Judge of the Regional Trial Court
of Manila (Branch 45) and GAVINO P. ABAYA,
Respondents.

[G.R. Nos. 92029-30 : December 20, 1990.] 192

SCRA 507 NICANOR G. DE GUZMAN, JR., Petitioner,
vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, Former Fifth Division,
HON. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, National Capital
Judicial Region, Br. 48, Manila, and ENRIQUE KP. TAN,
Respondents.

[G.R. No. 93394 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

514 FNCB FINANCE, Petitioner, vs. NAPOLEON
ESTAVILLO, Respondent.

[G.R. No. 43659 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

521 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs.
HON. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON and
FEDERICO DE GUZMAN, Respondents.

[G.R. Nos. 48535-36 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 533 KOH TIECK HENG, Petitioner, vs. PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES and COURT OF APPEALS,
Respondents.

[G.R. No. 49454 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

548 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Appellant, vs.
SALVADOR MONTEIRO, Appellee.
 [G.R. No. 49588 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA
554 DIONG BI CHU, alias PATRICK CHANG, CHANG KA
HEE and LU LIONG CORPORATION, Petitioners, vs.
THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. GREGORIO G.
PINEDA, as Presiding Judge, Court of First Instance of
Rizal, Branch XXI; JAIME NAVOA and MILAGROS DE
LEOS, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 63753-54 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 561 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. GREGORIO BERINGUEL, ARTURO
DEVARAS, ARTEMIO TULANG (at large), and RUFINO
CAMINONG (at large), accused. GREGORIO
BERINGUEL and ARTURO DEVARAS, Accused-
Appellants.

[G.R. No. 76519 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

575 TIMOTEO POJAS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
MERCEDES GOZO-DALOLE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
JUDGE, CITY OF TAGBILARAN, IRENEA POJAS,
CESARIA LAGROSA and CORNELIA BETINOL,
Respondents.

[G.R. Nos. 78551-52 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 579 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. ROLANDO MARCEDONIO y VILLANUEVA
and ANTONIO MARCEDONIO y VILLANUEVA, Accused-
Appellants.

[G.R. No. 78854 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

588 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. SALVADOR V. LUTAÑEZ alias "Jun Plementero",
Defendant-Appellant.

[G.R. No. 79526 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

598 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE TRADE
UNIONS (NAFTU), Petitioner, vs. MAINIT LUMBER
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WORKERS UNION-UNITED
LUMBER AND GENERAL WORKERS OF THE
PHILIPPINES. (MALDECOWU-ULGWP), Respondents.

[G.R. No. 80276 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

604 HYDRO RESOURCES CONTRACTORS
CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF TAX
APPEALS and THE HON. DEPUTY MINISTER OF
FINANCE, ALFREDO PIO DE RODA, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 83257-58 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 612 OSIAS ACADEMY and MONICA R. DE
CASTRO, Petitioners, vs. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
AND EMPLOYMENT, CONCHITA MERCADO, NECITAS
GACIS, EVELYN B. GARAIS, ESTRELLA GATON, EVA L.
CAYETANO, TERESA G. BILAZON, SUSAN G. FUELLAS,
ELVIRA D. GACIS, LOURDES CORREA, JULIETA A.
MANALO, NILA G. GABELO and TEODORO GUANIZO,
Respondents.

[G.R. No. 83696 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

621 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. DANTE BARTULAY Accused-Appellant.

[G.R. No. 84918 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

635 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. ED FERNANDEZ AVILA, Defendant-Appellant.

[G.R. No. 87807 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

644 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. ISAGANI DESLATE and ROMY
FRANCISCO alias "Romeo Francisco", Accused,
ISAGANI DESLATE, Appellant.

[G.R. No. 89407 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

649 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. ISABELO SANCHEZ y PANDILI, Accused-
Appellant.

[G.R. Nos. 89682-83 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 655 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. BENJAMIN HERICO, Defendant-
Appellant.

[G.R. No. 91513 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

663 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. GERONIMO GOLES, Defendant-Appellant.

[G.R. No. 43491 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

674 ATTY. TEODORO V. CABILAN & ALEJANDRO A.
PARALISAN, Petitioners, vs. HON. JUDGE JOSE R.
RAMOLETE & PROVINCIAL/CITY JAIL WARDEN of
Cebu City, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 46210 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

680 RICARDO VILLAFLOR, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF
APPEALS and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,**
Respondents.

[G.R. No. 61527 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

691 VICENTE GERARDO, VALENTINA GERARDO,
CORNELIO GERARDO, BENJAMIN GERARDO, ANGEL
GERARDO, & CONSTANTE GERARDO, Petitioners, vs.
HON. FLORENTINO DE LA PEÑA, Presiding Judge,
Branch VI, Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte,
TERESA ANTONIO BELZA, VISITACION ANTONIO
ADINA, ILUMINADA PASCUA ANTONIO, FELICIDAD
BATACAN MATA, POLICARPO BATACAN, BASILIO
BATACAN, ISABEL BANGLOY, IRINEO BANGLOY,
EDUARDO BANGLOY, DIONICIO BANGLOY, DOMINGA
BANGLOY, and ERMINIO BANGLOY, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 70556 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

698 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. MARIO ABLAO, ISAGANI SACOP, LEOPOLDO DE
GUZMAN, PEDRO LADIANA, ZENON SAMONTE,
ALFREDO DEL MUNDO, BRUNO ABLAO, ISIDORO
GALEMA, DANILO MERCADO, RUSTICO LIWANAG,
FRANCISCO BALDEMECA, HECTOR SAMONTE and
DAVID ABLAO, accused, MARIO ABLAO, ISAGANI
SACOP, LEOPOLDO DE GUZMAN, PEDRO LADIANA,
ZENON SAMONTE, and ALFREDO DEL MUNDO,
Accused-Appellants.

[G.R. No. 77668 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

709 SPOUSES EUFRACIO ROJAS AND CONCEPCION
ROJAS, Petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS,
AND SPOUSES FELIX E. MEDALLA AND DIONISIA
PACATAN MEDALLA, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 81039 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

725 INVESTMENT AND UNDERWRITING
CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs.
COMPTRONICS PHILIPPINES, INC. and GENE V.
TAMESIS, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 85157 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

735 FRANCISCO JOSE, ANTONIO, ERLINDA, JOVITA,
ARACELI, DOLORES, VIRGINIA, MARTA, LEDINIA, and
ANITA, all surnamed RAMON JAO, Petitioners, vs.
COURT OF APPEALS and LAUREANA C. VDA. DE
BAIRAN, as administratrix of the Estate of Pablo
Bairan, Respondents.

[G.R. No. 88336 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

743 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs.
THE HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN (FIRST
DIVISION), Respondents.

[G.R. No. 92625 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

768 JOSE ORDA and IMELDA LOZADA, Petitioners, vs.
THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and GIL
GALANG Respondents.

G.R. No. 32945 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO T.

NASSER v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 39430 December 3, 1990 - FRANCISCO

MANLAPAZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 55466 December 3, 1990 - MANILA

SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS,
ET AL.

G.R. No. 78778 December 3, 1990 - LEONIDA

CORONADO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 79560 December 3, 1990 - ANDRES E.

DITAN v. PHILIPPINE OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT
ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.

G.R. No. 80904 December 3, 1990 - BALTAZAR

PANTIG, ET AL. v. VENANCIO BALTAZAR

G.R. No. 82115 December 3, 1990 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. ROMEO B. ORTIZ

G.R. No. 84884 December 3, 1990 - EULALIO M.

RUIZ, ET AL. v. DOROTEO N. CANEBA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 87264 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO

DINGLASAN, ET AL. v. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 89545 December 3, 1990 - ROLANDO

DOLORFINO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

UDK No. 9864 December 3, 1990 - RUFINA VDA. DE

TANGUB v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 58668 December 4, 1990 - SANTIAGO

ESCARTE, JR., ET AL. v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF
THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. 71929 December 4, 1990 - ALITALIA v.

INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 74577 December 4, 1990 - CONSOLACION

VILLANUEVA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 80505 December 4, 1990 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. MARIO L. TANDOY

G.R. No. 80791 December 4, 1990 - PEOPLE’S

FINANCING CORP., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 86586 December 4, 1990 - NATIONAL

IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION v. TEODORO P.
REGINO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 86889 December 4, 1990 - LUZ FARMS v.

SEC. OF THE DEPT. OF AGRARIAN REFORM

G.R. No. 88177 December 4, 1990 - DOLORES A.

PAREDES v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. 93054 December 4, 1990 - ALEXANDER P.

ORDILLO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 30616 December 10, 1990 - EUFRACIO D.

ROJAS v. CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA

G.R. No. 36827 December 10, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

FOREST ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. v. RAMON C.
FERNANDEZ, ET AL.
 G.R. No. 44749 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF
THE PHIL. v. MELVIN S. GIRON

G.R. No. 50661 December 10, 1990 - RUBEN

DELFIN, ET AL. v. AMADO G. INCIONG, ET AL.

G.R. No. 55361 December 10, 1990 - TEOFILO

ERCILLO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 55613 December 10, 1990 - ERNESTO

DICHOSO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 56620 December 10, 1990 - FILIPINAS

MILLS, INC., ET AL. v. ABELARDO M. DAYRlT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 69863-65 December 10, 1990 - LINO

BROCKA, ET AL. v. JUAN PONCE ENRILE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 74762 December 10, 1990 - COMMERCIAL

MOTORS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONERS, NLRC,
SECOND DIVISION

G.R. No. 78163 December 10, 1990 - ANGELINA P.

SANTIAGO v. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ET AL.

G.R. No. 79962 December 10, 1990 - LUCIO R.

CRUZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 80397 December 10, 1990 - S & A

GAISANO INC., ET AL. v. VICENTE A. HIDALGO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82215 December 10, 1990 - ANTIPAZ P.

PRESCO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82374 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO M. AVILA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82495 December 10, 1990 - ALLIED

BANKING CORPORATION v. SEDFREY ORDOÑEZ

G.R. Nos. 84132-33 December 10, 1990 -

NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ET AL. v.
PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK, ET AL.

G.R. No. 85531 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. AMANDO TASARRA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 89988 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. LYDIA RAMA

G.R. No. 91041 December 10, 1990 - JOSE A.

SADDUL, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

A.M. No. P-86-32 December 10, 1990 - ALFREDO

LLANES v. GAUDIOSO BORJA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 31688 December 17, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

LANDS, ET AL. v. JUAN P. AQUINO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 68514 December 17, 1990 - TRADERS

ROYAL BANK v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT,
ET AL.

G.R. No. 71589 December 17, 1990 - CAGAYAN DE

ORO COLISEUM, INC. v. MINISTER OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 76303 December 17, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

LANDS v. FRANCISCO K. REDOR, ET AL.

G.R. No. 78623 December 17, 1990 - OFELIA P.

TRISTE v. LEYTE STATE COLLEGE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES, ET AL.

G.R. No. 83530 December 18, 1990 - CRISTITO R.

AUSTRIA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. 93867 December 18, 1990 - SIXTO S.

BRILLANTES, JR. v. HAYDEE B. YORAC

G.R. Nos. 95203-05 December 18, 1990 - ERNESTO

MACEDA v. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD, ET AL.

G.R. No. 95263 December 18, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. JUVENAL KYAMKO

A.C. No. 2756 December 18, 1990 - PRUDENTIAL

BANK v. BENJAMIN M. GRECIA

G.R. No. 44167 December 19, 1990 - JULITA

FRANCISCO, ET AL. v. CRISPIN V. BAUTISTA, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. 88710-13 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, ET AL. v. NESTLE PHILIPPINES,
INC., ET AL.

G.R. No. 91025 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. 95478 December 19, 1990 - EDUARDO

ACOP, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.

A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 December 19, 1990 - EFREN

JAVIER, ET AL. v. SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN, JR.

G.R. No. 46198 December 20, 1990 - DOMINGO

REYES v. SERAFIN E. CAMILON, ET AL.

G.R. No. 53556 December 20, 1990 - LILIA

AGUIRRE, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF
LEYTE, ET AL.
 G.R. No. 72019 December 20, 1990 - WORLD
MACHINE ENTERPRISES v. INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 81835 December 20, 1990 - ROMEO J.

ORDOÑEZ v. ALFREDO J. GUSTILO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82002 December 20, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO DE GUZMAN

G.R. Nos. 86492-94 December 20, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. LEOPOLDO MONTANTE

G.R. No. 88114 December 20, 1990 - PENTAGON

SECURITY, ET AL. v. VICENTE T. JIMENEZ, ET AL.

G.R. No. 89618 December 20, 1990 - RAUL S.

MANGLAPUS v. ANDRES E. MATIAS, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. 92029-30 December 20, 1990 - NICANOR

G. DE GUZMAN, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 93394 December 20, 1990 - FNCB

FINANCE v. NAPOLEON ESTAVILLO

G.R. No. 43659 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON, ET
AL.

G.R. Nos. 48535-36 December 21, 1990 - KOH

TIECK HENG v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. 49454 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR MONTEIRO

G.R. No. 49588 December 21, 1990 - DIONG BI

CHU, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 63753-54 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO BERINGUEL, ET AL.

G.R. No. 76519 December 21, 1990 - TIMOTEO

POJAS v. MERCEDES GOZO-DALOLE, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. 78551-52 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO MARCEDONIO

G.R. No. 78854 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR V. LUTAÑEZ

G.R. No. 79526 December 21, 1990 - NATIONAL

ASSO. OF FREE TRADE UNIONS v. MAINIT LUMBER
DEVT. COMPANY WORKERS

G.R. No. 80276 December 21, 1990 - HYDRO

RESOURCES CONTRACTORS CORPORATION v. COURT
OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 83257-58 December 21, 1990 - OSIAS

ACADEMY, ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 83696 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. DANTE BARTULAY

G.R. No. 84918 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ED FERNANDEZ AVILA

G.R. No. 87807 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ISAGANI DESLATE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 89407 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ISABELO P. SANCHEZ

G.R. Nos. 89682-83 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN HERICO

G.R. No. 91513 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. GERONIMO GOLES

G.R. No. 43491 December 26, 1990 - TEODORO V.

CABILAN, ET AL. v. JOSE R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 46210 December 26, 1990 - RICARDO

VILLAFLOR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 61527 December 26, 1990 - VICENTE

GERARDO, ET AL. v. FLORENTINO DE LA PEÑA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 70556 December 26, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. MARIO ABLAO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 77668 December 26, 1990 - EUFRACIO

ROJAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 81039 December 26, 1990 - INVESTMENT

AND UNDERWRITING CORP. OF THE PHIL. v.
COMPTRONICS PHILIPPINES, INC., ET AL.

G.R. No. 85157 December 26, 1990 - FRANCISCO

JOSE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 88336 December 26, 1990 - REPUBLIC OF

THE PHIL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN

G.R. No. 92625 December 26, 1990 - JOSE ORDA,

ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 32945 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO T.

NASSER v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
 G.R. No. 39430 December 3, 1990 - FRANCISCO
MANLAPAZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 55466 December 3, 1990 - MANILA

SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS,
ET AL.

G.R. No. 78778 December 3, 1990 - LEONIDA

CORONADO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 79560 December 3, 1990 - ANDRES E.

DITAN v. PHILIPPINE OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT
ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.

G.R. No. 80904 December 3, 1990 - BALTAZAR

PANTIG, ET AL. v. VENANCIO BALTAZAR

G.R. No. 82115 December 3, 1990 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. ROMEO B. ORTIZ

G.R. No. 84884 December 3, 1990 - EULALIO M.

RUIZ, ET AL. v. DOROTEO N. CANEBA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 87264 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO

DINGLASAN, ET AL. v. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 89545 December 3, 1990 - ROLANDO

DOLORFINO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

UDK No. 9864 December 3, 1990 - RUFINA VDA. DE

TANGUB v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 58668 December 4, 1990 - SANTIAGO

ESCARTE, JR., ET AL. v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF
THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. 71929 December 4, 1990 - ALITALIA v.

INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 74577 December 4, 1990 - CONSOLACION

VILLANUEVA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 80505 December 4, 1990 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. MARIO L. TANDOY

G.R. No. 80791 December 4, 1990 - PEOPLE’S

FINANCING CORP., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 86586 December 4, 1990 - NATIONAL

IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION v. TEODORO P.
REGINO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 86889 December 4, 1990 - LUZ FARMS v.

SEC. OF THE DEPT. OF AGRARIAN REFORM

G.R. No. 88177 December 4, 1990 - DOLORES A.

PAREDES v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. 93054 December 4, 1990 - ALEXANDER P.

ORDILLO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 30616 December 10, 1990 - EUFRACIO D.

ROJAS v. CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA

G.R. No. 36827 December 10, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

FOREST ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. v. RAMON C.
FERNANDEZ, ET AL.

G.R. No. 44749 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. MELVIN S. GIRON

G.R. No. 50661 December 10, 1990 - RUBEN

DELFIN, ET AL. v. AMADO G. INCIONG, ET AL.

G.R. No. 55361 December 10, 1990 - TEOFILO

ERCILLO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 55613 December 10, 1990 - ERNESTO

DICHOSO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 56620 December 10, 1990 - FILIPINAS

MILLS, INC., ET AL. v. ABELARDO M. DAYRlT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 69863-65 December 10, 1990 - LINO

BROCKA, ET AL. v. JUAN PONCE ENRILE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 74762 December 10, 1990 - COMMERCIAL

MOTORS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONERS, NLRC,
SECOND DIVISION

G.R. No. 78163 December 10, 1990 - ANGELINA P.

SANTIAGO v. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ET AL.

G.R. No. 79962 December 10, 1990 - LUCIO R.

CRUZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 80397 December 10, 1990 - S & A

GAISANO INC., ET AL. v. VICENTE A. HIDALGO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82215 December 10, 1990 - ANTIPAZ P.

PRESCO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82374 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO M. AVILA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82495 December 10, 1990 - ALLIED

BANKING CORPORATION v. SEDFREY ORDOÑEZ
 G.R. Nos. 84132-33 December 10, 1990 -
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ET AL. v.
PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK, ET AL.

G.R. No. 85531 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. AMANDO TASARRA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 89988 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. LYDIA RAMA

G.R. No. 91041 December 10, 1990 - JOSE A.

SADDUL, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

A.M. No. P-86-32 December 10, 1990 - ALFREDO

LLANES v. GAUDIOSO BORJA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 31688 December 17, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

LANDS, ET AL. v. JUAN P. AQUINO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 68514 December 17, 1990 - TRADERS

ROYAL BANK v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT,
ET AL.

G.R. No. 71589 December 17, 1990 - CAGAYAN DE

ORO COLISEUM, INC. v. MINISTER OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 76303 December 17, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

LANDS v. FRANCISCO K. REDOR, ET AL.

G.R. No. 78623 December 17, 1990 - OFELIA P.

TRISTE v. LEYTE STATE COLLEGE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES, ET AL.

G.R. No. 83530 December 18, 1990 - CRISTITO R.

AUSTRIA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. 93867 December 18, 1990 - SIXTO S.

BRILLANTES, JR. v. HAYDEE B. YORAC

G.R. Nos. 95203-05 December 18, 1990 - ERNESTO

MACEDA v. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD, ET AL.

G.R. No. 95263 December 18, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. JUVENAL KYAMKO

A.C. No. 2756 December 18, 1990 - PRUDENTIAL

BANK v. BENJAMIN M. GRECIA

G.R. No. 44167 December 19, 1990 - JULITA

FRANCISCO, ET AL. v. CRISPIN V. BAUTISTA, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. 88710-13 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, ET AL. v. NESTLE PHILIPPINES,
INC., ET AL.

G.R. No. 91025 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. 95478 December 19, 1990 - EDUARDO

ACOP, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.

A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 December 19, 1990 - EFREN

JAVIER, ET AL. v. SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN, JR.

G.R. No. 46198 December 20, 1990 - DOMINGO

REYES v. SERAFIN E. CAMILON, ET AL.

G.R. No. 53556 December 20, 1990 - LILIA

AGUIRRE, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF
LEYTE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 72019 December 20, 1990 - WORLD

MACHINE ENTERPRISES v. INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 81835 December 20, 1990 - ROMEO J.

ORDOÑEZ v. ALFREDO J. GUSTILO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82002 December 20, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO DE GUZMAN

G.R. Nos. 86492-94 December 20, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. LEOPOLDO MONTANTE

G.R. No. 88114 December 20, 1990 - PENTAGON

SECURITY, ET AL. v. VICENTE T. JIMENEZ, ET AL.

G.R. No. 89618 December 20, 1990 - RAUL S.

MANGLAPUS v. ANDRES E. MATIAS, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. 92029-30 December 20, 1990 - NICANOR

G. DE GUZMAN, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 93394 December 20, 1990 - FNCB

FINANCE v. NAPOLEON ESTAVILLO

G.R. No. 43659 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON, ET
AL.

G.R. Nos. 48535-36 December 21, 1990 - KOH

TIECK HENG v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. 49454 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR MONTEIRO

G.R. No. 49588 December 21, 1990 - DIONG BI

CHU, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
 G.R. No. 63753-54 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF
THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO BERINGUEL, ET AL.

G.R. No. 76519 December 21, 1990 - TIMOTEO

POJAS v. MERCEDES GOZO-DALOLE, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. 78551-52 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO MARCEDONIO

G.R. No. 78854 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR V. LUTAÑEZ

G.R. No. 79526 December 21, 1990 - NATIONAL

ASSO. OF FREE TRADE UNIONS v. MAINIT LUMBER
DEVT. COMPANY WORKERS

G.R. No. 80276 December 21, 1990 - HYDRO

RESOURCES CONTRACTORS CORPORATION v. COURT
OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 83257-58 December 21, 1990 - OSIAS

ACADEMY, ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 83696 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. DANTE BARTULAY

G.R. No. 84918 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ED FERNANDEZ AVILA

G.R. No. 87807 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ISAGANI DESLATE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 89407 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ISABELO P. SANCHEZ

G.R. Nos. 89682-83 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN HERICO

G.R. No. 91513 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. GERONIMO GOLES

G.R. No. 43491 December 26, 1990 - TEODORO V.

CABILAN, ET AL. v. JOSE R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 46210 December 26, 1990 - RICARDO

VILLAFLOR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 61527 December 26, 1990 - VICENTE

GERARDO, ET AL. v. FLORENTINO DE LA PEÑA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 70556 December 26, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. MARIO ABLAO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 77668 December 26, 1990 - EUFRACIO

ROJAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 81039 December 26, 1990 - INVESTMENT

AND UNDERWRITING CORP. OF THE PHIL. v.
COMPTRONICS PHILIPPINES, INC., ET AL.

G.R. No. 85157 December 26, 1990 - FRANCISCO

JOSE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 88336 December 26, 1990 - REPUBLIC OF

THE PHIL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN

G.R. No. 92625 December 26, 1990 - JOSE ORDA,

ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 32945 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO T.

NASSER v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 39430 December 3, 1990 - FRANCISCO

MANLAPAZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 55466 December 3, 1990 - MANILA

SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS,
ET AL.

G.R. No. 78778 December 3, 1990 - LEONIDA

CORONADO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 79560 December 3, 1990 - ANDRES E.

DITAN v. PHILIPPINE OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT
ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.

G.R. No. 80904 December 3, 1990 - BALTAZAR

PANTIG, ET AL. v. VENANCIO BALTAZAR

G.R. No. 82115 December 3, 1990 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. ROMEO B. ORTIZ

G.R. No. 84884 December 3, 1990 - EULALIO M.

RUIZ, ET AL. v. DOROTEO N. CANEBA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 87264 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO

DINGLASAN, ET AL. v. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 89545 December 3, 1990 - ROLANDO

DOLORFINO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

UDK No. 9864 December 3, 1990 - RUFINA VDA. DE

TANGUB v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 58668 December 4, 1990 - SANTIAGO

ESCARTE, JR., ET AL. v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF
THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. 71929 December 4, 1990 - ALITALIA v.

INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.
 G.R. No. 74577 December 4, 1990 - CONSOLACION
VILLANUEVA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 80505 December 4, 1990 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. MARIO L. TANDOY

G.R. No. 80791 December 4, 1990 - PEOPLE’S

FINANCING CORP., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 86586 December 4, 1990 - NATIONAL

IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION v. TEODORO P.
REGINO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 86889 December 4, 1990 - LUZ FARMS v.

SEC. OF THE DEPT. OF AGRARIAN REFORM

G.R. No. 88177 December 4, 1990 - DOLORES A.

PAREDES v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. 93054 December 4, 1990 - ALEXANDER P.

ORDILLO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 30616 December 10, 1990 - EUFRACIO D.

ROJAS v. CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA

G.R. No. 36827 December 10, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

FOREST ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. v. RAMON C.
FERNANDEZ, ET AL.

G.R. No. 44749 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. MELVIN S. GIRON

G.R. No. 50661 December 10, 1990 - RUBEN

DELFIN, ET AL. v. AMADO G. INCIONG, ET AL.

G.R. No. 55361 December 10, 1990 - TEOFILO

ERCILLO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 55613 December 10, 1990 - ERNESTO

DICHOSO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 56620 December 10, 1990 - FILIPINAS

MILLS, INC., ET AL. v. ABELARDO M. DAYRlT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 69863-65 December 10, 1990 - LINO

BROCKA, ET AL. v. JUAN PONCE ENRILE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 74762 December 10, 1990 - COMMERCIAL

MOTORS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONERS, NLRC,
SECOND DIVISION

G.R. No. 78163 December 10, 1990 - ANGELINA P.

SANTIAGO v. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ET AL.

G.R. No. 79962 December 10, 1990 - LUCIO R.

CRUZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 80397 December 10, 1990 - S & A

GAISANO INC., ET AL. v. VICENTE A. HIDALGO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82215 December 10, 1990 - ANTIPAZ P.

PRESCO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82374 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO M. AVILA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82495 December 10, 1990 - ALLIED

BANKING CORPORATION v. SEDFREY ORDOÑEZ

G.R. Nos. 84132-33 December 10, 1990 -

NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ET AL. v.
PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK, ET AL.

G.R. No. 85531 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. AMANDO TASARRA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 89988 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. LYDIA RAMA

G.R. No. 91041 December 10, 1990 - JOSE A.

SADDUL, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

A.M. No. P-86-32 December 10, 1990 - ALFREDO

LLANES v. GAUDIOSO BORJA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 31688 December 17, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

LANDS, ET AL. v. JUAN P. AQUINO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 68514 December 17, 1990 - TRADERS

ROYAL BANK v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT,
ET AL.

G.R. No. 71589 December 17, 1990 - CAGAYAN DE

ORO COLISEUM, INC. v. MINISTER OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 76303 December 17, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

LANDS v. FRANCISCO K. REDOR, ET AL.

G.R. No. 78623 December 17, 1990 - OFELIA P.

TRISTE v. LEYTE STATE COLLEGE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES, ET AL.

G.R. No. 83530 December 18, 1990 - CRISTITO R.

AUSTRIA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. 93867 December 18, 1990 - SIXTO S.

BRILLANTES, JR. v. HAYDEE B. YORAC
 G.R. Nos. 95203-05 December 18, 1990 - ERNESTO
MACEDA v. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD, ET AL.

G.R. No. 95263 December 18, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. JUVENAL KYAMKO

A.C. No. 2756 December 18, 1990 - PRUDENTIAL

BANK v. BENJAMIN M. GRECIA

G.R. No. 44167 December 19, 1990 - JULITA

FRANCISCO, ET AL. v. CRISPIN V. BAUTISTA, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. 88710-13 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, ET AL. v. NESTLE PHILIPPINES,
INC., ET AL.

G.R. No. 91025 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. 95478 December 19, 1990 - EDUARDO

ACOP, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.

A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 December 19, 1990 - EFREN

JAVIER, ET AL. v. SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN, JR.

G.R. No. 46198 December 20, 1990 - DOMINGO

REYES v. SERAFIN E. CAMILON, ET AL.

G.R. No. 53556 December 20, 1990 - LILIA

AGUIRRE, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF
LEYTE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 72019 December 20, 1990 - WORLD

MACHINE ENTERPRISES v. INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 81835 December 20, 1990 - ROMEO J.

ORDOÑEZ v. ALFREDO J. GUSTILO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 82002 December 20, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO DE GUZMAN

G.R. Nos. 86492-94 December 20, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. LEOPOLDO MONTANTE

G.R. No. 88114 December 20, 1990 - PENTAGON

SECURITY, ET AL. v. VICENTE T. JIMENEZ, ET AL.

G.R. No. 89618 December 20, 1990 - RAUL S.

MANGLAPUS v. ANDRES E. MATIAS, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. 92029-30 December 20, 1990 - NICANOR

G. DE GUZMAN, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 93394 December 20, 1990 - FNCB

FINANCE v. NAPOLEON ESTAVILLO

G.R. No. 43659 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON, ET
AL.

G.R. Nos. 48535-36 December 21, 1990 - KOH

TIECK HENG v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

G.R. No. 49454 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR MONTEIRO

G.R. No. 49588 December 21, 1990 - DIONG BI

CHU, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 63753-54 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO BERINGUEL, ET AL.

G.R. No. 76519 December 21, 1990 - TIMOTEO

POJAS v. MERCEDES GOZO-DALOLE, ET AL.

G.R. Nos. 78551-52 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO MARCEDONIO

G.R. No. 78854 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR V. LUTAÑEZ

G.R. No. 79526 December 21, 1990 - NATIONAL

ASSO. OF FREE TRADE UNIONS v. MAINIT LUMBER
DEVT. COMPANY WORKERS

G.R. No. 80276 December 21, 1990 - HYDRO

RESOURCES CONTRACTORS CORPORATION v. COURT
OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 83257-58 December 21, 1990 - OSIAS

ACADEMY, ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 83696 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. DANTE BARTULAY

G.R. No. 84918 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ED FERNANDEZ AVILA

G.R. No. 87807 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ISAGANI DESLATE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 89407 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. ISABELO P. SANCHEZ

G.R. Nos. 89682-83 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN HERICO

G.R. No. 91513 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. GERONIMO GOLES
 G.R. No. 43491 December 26, 1990 - TEODORO V.
CABILAN, ET AL. v. JOSE R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.

G.R. No. 46210 December 26, 1990 - RICARDO

VILLAFLOR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 61527 December 26, 1990 - VICENTE

GERARDO, ET AL. v. FLORENTINO DE LA PEÑA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 70556 December 26, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. MARIO ABLAO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 77668 December 26, 1990 - EUFRACIO

ROJAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 81039 December 26, 1990 - INVESTMENT

AND UNDERWRITING CORP. OF THE PHIL. v.
COMPTRONICS PHILIPPINES, INC., ET AL.

G.R. No. 85157 December 26, 1990 - FRANCISCO

JOSE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 88336 December 26, 1990 - REPUBLIC OF

THE PHIL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN

G.R. No. 92625 December 26, 1990 - JOSE ORDA,

ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

Copyright © 1998 - 2019 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™ RED