Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chemosphere
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Non- to octa-chlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) were analyzed in flue gas samples collected simulta-
Received 18 December 2007 neously at three different temperatures (450 °C, 300 °C and 200 °C, respectively) in the post-combustion
Received in revised form 25 March 2008 zone during waste combustion experiments using a laboratory-scale fluidized-bed reactor. PCN homo-
Accepted 1 April 2008
logue profiles in all samples were dominated by the lower chlorinated homologues (mono- to triCN), with
Available online 2 June 2008
successive reductions in abundance with each additional degree of chlorination. The isomer distribution
patterns reflected ortho-directionality behavior of the first chlorine substituent, and the b-positions, i.e.
Keywords:
the 2,3,6,7-substitution sites, seemed to be favored for chlorination. Injection of naphthalene into the
Laboratory-scale reactor
Injection
post-combustion zone resulted in increased PCN levels at 200 °C, demonstrating the occurrence of chlo-
Poor combustion rination reactions in the post-combustion zone. However, the increases were restricted to the least-chlo-
Homologue profiles rinated homologue (monoCN), probably because there was insufficient residence time for further
Isomer distribution patterns chlorination. In addition, an episode of poor combustion (manifested by high CO levels) was accompanied
by extensive formation of 1,8-diCN, 1,2,3- and 1,2,8-triCN; congeners with substitution patterns that are
not thermodynamically favorable. These are believed to be products of PAH breakdown reactions and/or
chlorophenol condensation. Overall, PCN formation is likely to occur via more than one pathway, includ-
ing chlorination of naphthalene that is already present, de novo synthesis from PAHs and, possibly, chlo-
rophenol condensation.
Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0045-6535/$ - see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.002
S. Jansson et al. / Chemosphere 72 (2008) 1138–1144 1139
of poor combustion on PCN formation and chlorination was calculated on a molar basis and normalized to 1 atm, 0 °C, dry
evaluated. gas (dg), and 11% O2.
Two injection experiments were performed; injection of naph-
2. Experimental section thalene (run 2) and a solvent control injection (run 3). In both cases
injection was performed using a gas-tight 10 ll syringe (Hamilton)
2.1. Combustion experiments mounted in a microdialysis pump (CMA/100, CMA microdialysis).
The syringe injected 3 ll h 1 (2.04 mg h 1) of n-heptane (Merck,
Three experiments (runs 1–3) were performed using the 5 kW pro analysi) into a nebulizer (TR-30-A3, Meinhard) with a
laboratory-scale fluidized-bed combustion reactor at Umeå Uni- 100 ml min 1 flow of purified air, resulting in a concentration of
versity (Fig. 1), which has been described in detail elsewhere 0.26 mg m 3 in the flue gas. The combination of a low injection
(Wikström et al., 1998; Aurell et al., in press). Briefly, the reactor rate and high flow in the nebulizer ensured complete volatilization,
consists of a fluidized sand bed (primary-combustion zone), free- and the gas-phase mixture was directly injected into the post-com-
board (secondary-combustion zone), convector (post-combustion bustion zone at P2 (650 °C) through a ceramic liner. During run 2,
zone), and air pollution control system. A standardized artificial naphthalene (Sigma–Aldrich, 99%) dissolved in n-heptane at a con-
MSW with a material and elemental composition similar to typical centration of 0.03 mg ll 1 (giving a concentration of 11 lg m 3 in
Swedish MSW, previously described by Aurell et al. (in press), was the flue gas; approximately five times the normal flue gas concen-
used as fuel. All three runs were performed using the same com- tration), was injected, and after 30 min of injection three samples
bustion settings, starting with pre-heating the reactor with pro- were collected simultaneously, for 60 min, at P3, P4, and P7. In
pane combustion for 2 h (Fig. 1), then MSW combustion was run 3, n-heptane was injected as solvent control, following the
initiated and continued for 8.5 h at an average fuel feeding rate same procedure as in the naphthalene injection. After 30 min of
of 0.86 ± 0.02 kg h 1. The primary air flow was set to 110 l min 1 injection, two successive samples were collected for 60 min at P4
and secondary air flow to 30 l min 1. Combustion gas concentra- (300 °C) during continuous injection. During collection of the first
tions (H2O, CO2, SO2, NO2, CO, NO, HCl, NH3, N2O, and CH4) and sample combustion conditions were stable, while during the sec-
O2 levels were monitored using a FTIR spectrometer (ABB Bomem ond sampling a 770 ppm CO-peak was detected, indicating poor
9100 Gas Analyzer) and an oxygen measuring probe (ScanTronic combustion conditions, which enabled the effect of poor combus-
OC 2010). tion on PCN formation to be evaluated.
In all three runs, three reference flue gas samples were collected Spiking, filtration, and extraction of flue gas samples were per-
simultaneously for 45 min after 4 h of MSW combustion (Fig. 1). formed according to methods described elsewhere (Liljelind et al.,
The samples were collected at sampling ports P3, P4, and P7 2003). Cleanup prior to naphthalene and mono-to diCN analysis
(Fig. 1), corresponding to flue gas temperatures of approximately was performed using a 10% deactivated silica column eluted with
450 °C, 300 °C, and 200 °C. Sampling was performed using the 50 mL of cyclopentane. Cleanup prior to tri- to octaCN analysis
cooled probe polyurethane foam plug sampling technique accord- was performed using a multilayer silica column eluted with
ing to the standard method EN 1948:1 (European Committee for 30 ml of n-hexane onto an alumina oxide column, which was
Standardization, 1997) and the concentrations of analytes were eluted with 30 ml of n-hexane (discarded) and then with 100 ml
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the laboratory-scale fluidized-bed reactor, not to scale. Sampling ports are denoted P1–P8, electrical heaters H1–H9, thermocouples T1–T12, and
injection ports I1–I4. The air pollution control system consists of a cyclone (A), a metal and textile filter (B), a wet scrubber (C), and an active carbon filter (D). The positions
where flue gas samples were collected are marked P3, P4, and P7. Injections were made at P2. Timelines for the experimental runs 1–3 are shown in the inset panel.
1140 S. Jansson et al. / Chemosphere 72 (2008) 1138–1144
Table 2
Concentrations of naphthalene, PCN, PCN/Naphthalene ratio, degree of chlorination, dioxin-like PCN/PC4–8N ratio, PCN/PCDF ratio and PCN/PCDD ratio in the flue gases
Description Exp. Naphthalene PCN PCN/ Degree of Dioxin-like PCNb/ PCN/PCDFc PCN/PCDDc
run (nmol m 3 dg) (nmol m 3
dg) naphthalene chlorinationa PC4–8N ratio ratio ratio
ratio
Reference samples 1–3 2.2 ± 0.74 0.23 ± 0.057 0.11 1.82 ± 0.12 0.10 1.3 63
450 °C
Reference samples 1–3 2.1 ± 0.43 0.28 ± 0.076 0.14 1.69 ± 0.12 0.10 1.8 53
300 °C
Reference samples 1–3 1.6 ± 0.38 0.30 ± 0.054 0.19 1.89 ± 0.13 0.083 2.0 91
200 °C
Naphthalene 2 7.1 0.18 0.025 1.76 0.11 1.3 66
injection 450 °C
Naphthalene 2 8.5 0.37 0.044 1.71 0.094 2.0 80
injection 300 °C
Naphthalene 2 7.0 0.42 0.061 1.66 0.086 3.4 158
injection 200 °C
Poor combustion 3H#2 93 3.5 0.037 1.18 0.084 11 549
300 °C
Fig. 2. PCN homologue profiles in the reference samples at 450 °C, 300 °C and 200 °C (n = 3), shown as homologue fractions (homologue sums relative to RPCN). Error bars
represent ±1 standard deviation.
formation mechanisms were likely related to chlorination and/or directionality behavior of the first chlorine substituent, indicating
dechlorination. Moreover, in the present study there was probably chlorination by electrophilic aromatic substitution. In addition,
insufficient residence time in the required temperature interval for the b-positions, i.e. the 2,3,6,7-substitution sites, seemed to be
further chlorination of already formed mono- to triCNs. somewhat favored for chlorination; an interesting analogy with
PCDD and PCDF formation, in which the lateral 2,3,7,8-positions
3.4. Isomer distribution patterns are also preferred for chlorine substitution (Weber et al., 2001).
The preference of the b-positions may be explained by the higher
The lower chlorinated homologues displayed relatively evenly relative stability of congeners chlorinated in the b-positions com-
distributed PCN isomer distribution patterns: 1- and 2-monoCNs pared to the a-positions (Zhai and Wang, 2005). It is important
were more or less equally abundant (Fig. 3), while among the diC- to note that even though for most homologues the dominating iso-
Ns the coeluting congeners 2,6-/1,7-diCN were most abundant, fol- mers were coeluting, this did not obscure the observations.
lowed by 1,3- and 1,2-diCN. The triCN-pattern was dominated by Based on the dominating isomers within each homologue, two
1,2,7-triCN, followed by 1,2,4-, 1,3,6-, 1,2,3-, and 1,3,7-TriCN. parallel chlorination pathways from mono- to hepta-chlorinated
Among the tetra-to hepta-chlorinated homologues, more distinct naphthalene were postulated, as illustrated in Fig. 4. Chlorination
domination by specific congeners was observed. The tetraCN iso- of monoCN is directed to the second benzene ring in the naphtha-
mer distribution pattern was dominated by two peaks, both con- lene molecule, which provides the highest stability (Zhai and
sisting of three coeluting isomers: 1,2,3,7-, 1,2,3,4- and 1,2,6,7- Wang, 2005), while further chlorine substitution mainly indicates
tetraCN in one, and 1,2,5,7-, 1,2,4,6- and 1,2,4,7-tetraCN in the ortho-directed electrophilic aromatic substitution. In addition, a
other. The pentaCNs were dominated by one peak (containing coel- few of the congeners may be attributed to formation from chloro-
uting 1,2,3,5,7- and 1,2,4,6,7-pentaCN), accounting for more than phenol condensation, i.e. 1,7- and 2,6-diCN (Kim et al., 2007) or
35% of the total pentaCN concentration, followed by 1,2,3,6,7-pen- PAH breakdown reactions, i.e. 1,2,6,7-tetraCN (Iino et al., 1999).
taCN (15%) and 1,2,3,5,6-pentaCN (13%). The hexaCNs were domi- Thus, it seems likely that PCN formation during these conditions
nated by 1,2,3,4,6,7- and 1,2,3,5,6,7-hexaCN (coeluting), and lastly is not a result of a single pathway, but rather reflects a combination
1,2,3,4,5,6,7-heptaCN clearly dominated over 1,2,3,4,5,6,8-hep- of chlorination of naphthalene that is already present, de novo syn-
taCN, which was close to the detection limit in some samples. thesis from PAHs and, possibly, chlorophenol condensation.
The relative abundances of the congeners were in good agreement
with stability estimates published by Zhai and Wang (2005), and 3.5. Naphthalene injection
corresponded quite well with the stoker incinerator pattern re-
ported by Imagawa and Lee (2001), in which the chlorine substitu- During injection of naphthalene into the flue gas duct the total
tion pattern appeared to be derived from a-position oriented levels of PCNs increased by approximately 30% at 200 °C compared
dechlorination of the higher chlorinated PCNs. In the present study to the reference samples (Table 2). Furthermore, the degree of
the isomer distribution patterns to some extent reflected ortho- chlorination was reduced, and in contrast to the reference samples
1142 S. Jansson et al. / Chemosphere 72 (2008) 1138–1144
Fig. 3. PCN isomer distribution patterns in the reference samples at 450 °C, 300 °C and 200 °C. Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. The generalized molecular structure
of PCN is inserted, where x and y represent 0–4 chlorine substituents.
the degree of chlorination tended to decrease with the tempera- pattern remained unchanged (not shown), but the homologue pro-
ture, indicating that mainly the lower chlorinated homologues files exhibited increased formation of the monochlorinated naph-
were formed, while the dioxin-like PCN/PCN ratio appeared to be thalene at 300 °C and 200 °C during naphthalene injection
unaffected by the naphthalene injection. The isomer distribution (Fig. 5). Tetra- to octaCN appeared to be more or less unaffected
S. Jansson et al. / Chemosphere 72 (2008) 1138–1144 1143
by the injection of naphthalene, probably due to insufficient resi- tion zone did not affect either total levels or homologue profiles
dence time in the required temperature interval limiting further (Fig. 1 in the supplementary material) of PCNs in the flue gas. How-
chlorination. This adds further support to the hypothesis that the ever, towards the end of the second sampling a short period of
major PCN formation route involves successive chlorination of insufficient combustion efficiency (referred to as poor combustion)
naphthalene. caused by fuel feeding irregularities resulted in a 770 ppm CO-
peak. Although the CO-peak was limited in both magnitude and
3.6. The influence of poor combustion duration, the effect of the poor combustion event was striking,
clearly promoting formation of naphthalene as well as PCNs (de-
The first sample collected during the solvent control injection noted 3H#2, Table 2). However, the homologue profiles were only
(run 3) confirmed that injecting n-heptane into the post-combus- slightly affected, displaying a larger increase in the monoCNs than
1144 S. Jansson et al. / Chemosphere 72 (2008) 1138–1144
Fig. 5. Post-combustion zone PCN concentrations in reference samples (left) and samples collected during naphthalene injection (right). Error bars represent ±1 standard
deviation.