The document discusses several aspects of strategy review, evaluation, and control. It outlines the strategic evaluation framework which requires ongoing comparisons between the evolving product and the original intended remedy. It also discusses reviewing competitor strategies and reactions, measuring organizational performance, taking corrective actions when needed, ensuring effective evaluation systems promote cooperation, and having contingency plans for unexpected outcomes.
The document discusses several aspects of strategy review, evaluation, and control. It outlines the strategic evaluation framework which requires ongoing comparisons between the evolving product and the original intended remedy. It also discusses reviewing competitor strategies and reactions, measuring organizational performance, taking corrective actions when needed, ensuring effective evaluation systems promote cooperation, and having contingency plans for unexpected outcomes.
The document discusses several aspects of strategy review, evaluation, and control. It outlines the strategic evaluation framework which requires ongoing comparisons between the evolving product and the original intended remedy. It also discusses reviewing competitor strategies and reactions, measuring organizational performance, taking corrective actions when needed, ensuring effective evaluation systems promote cooperation, and having contingency plans for unexpected outcomes.
- The Strategy Evaluation Framework: The Strategic Evaluation Framework works by
requiring ongoing comparisons between the evolving product under development and the original traits of a remedy that would be both distinctive and address an unmet market need functions by enforcing a constant benchmarking of the evolving product in development relative to the original characteristics of a therapy that would be both differentiated and solve some as yet unmet market need.
- Reviewing bases of strategy, Measuring How have competitors reacted to our
strategies? How have competitors' strategies changed? Have major competitors' strengths and weaknesses changed? Why are competitors making certain strategic changes? Why are some competitors' strategies more successful than others?
- Organizational performance, Corrective action is a process of communicating with the
employee to improve behavior or performance after other methods such as coaching and performance appraisal have not been successful In general, corrective action should be progressive, beginning with the lowest severity action before employing actions of more severity. Any formal corrective or disciplinary action must follow the principles of "Just Cause". - Actions
- Characteristics of Effective Evaluation System Strategy evaluation process should not
dominate or curb decisions; it should promote mutual understanding, trust and common cause. All functional and operational areas should cooperate with each other in evaluating and controlling strategies.
- Contingency planning a contingency plan, also known colloquially as Plan B, is a plan
devised for an outcome other than in the usual plan. A course of action designed to help an organization respond to an event that may or may not happen. Contingency plans can also be referred to as 'Plan B' because it can work as an alternative action if things don't go as planned. It is often used for risk management for an exceptional risk that, though unlikely, would have catastrophic consequences