Consultant LACASA arent orator 7 DAMAC DAMAC CRESCENT PROPORTIES - LLC. NATIONAL PILING ‘GOLF VITA APARTMENTS - PROPOSED ADDITIONAL G+2P+27 STOREY RESIDENTAL TOWER (TB) ON PLOT NO. 6765410 AT DAMAC HILLS DUBAI [Weare sendng herewih under separate cover the Gawings/ documents / samples lsted below. TTEMNO.| DWGS, SPECS, DESCRIPTION TYPE _| COPIES _|REWARKS| [Method Statement And Design of Temporary Soldier Beam With Tie Back Anchor oT | 2Sets [Contractor Name: InP. Alex (Chief Executive Officer) [Consultant Decision ‘Approved “Approved As Noted Not Approved TC) NotRequired [Design Consultant (Name): IMr. Fadi Ayyad - Projects Manager - IMs. LACASA, (om compas wi [Contac Tris check is on for review of general conformance withthe design concept of the project and genera complianoe wi Joho contract documents. The contractor i rexponsiie for conning and coeiating al quanti and dmensons, selectingMETHOD STATEMENT AND DESIGN of Temporary Soldier Beam With Tie Back Anchor GOLF VITA APARTMENTS PROPOSED ADDITIONAL G+2P+27 STOREY RESIDENTIAL TOWER (TB) ON PLOT NO. 6765410 AT DAMAC HILLS, DUBAI CLIENT : Mls, DAMAC CRESCENT PROPERTIES L.L.C. CONSULTANT : MIs. LACASA. SHORING CONTRACTOR: M/s. NATIONAL PILING. REF. No: P-414 Cheriyan P. Alex Chief Executive Officer Dubai — July 4, 2022Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Date 04-07-2022 Mss, No. MST & DESIGNIEDITemp. RWIP-414 Tssue 01- Rev. No. 0 porary Retaining P4144 AMENDMENT RECORD SHEET ‘Section No. Revision | Amendment Date of ] Prepared | Checked | Issued No. Details Issue By By, By Wiss No. MST & Tssued for DESIGN/ED/Temp. RWIP-414 00 Engineer's approval | 04.07.2022) IY arty wt ea > Rev.0 Page A P44Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Date:04-07-2022 Mss. No. MST & DESIGNIED/Temp. RWIP-474 | Issue -01- Rev. No.0 LIST OF CONTENTS 4.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 METHOD STATEMENT FOR DOUBLE CHANNEL! BEAM WITH TIE BACK ANCHOR 24 General 22 Installation of Double Channel beam wall 23. Method of Installation 24 Preparation of Double Channel beam 2.5 Installation of Tie Back Anchors 2.6 Installation of Concrete Panels, 27 Dewatering 28 Monitoring ofthe shoring system. 29 Safety measures in case of damage of concrete panel. 240 Design Criteria 3,0 DESIGN OF RESTRAINED DOUBLE U CHANNEL/ H BEAM WALL- SECTION 1 (Max. excavation from +30.625 DMD to +24.5 DMD) 3.1 WALLAP ANALYSIS - SLS- 3.1.1 Dimension of H Beam 3.1.2 Dimension of RC Panel 3.1.3 Tie Back Anchors 3.1.4 Design of waling beam. 3.2 WALLAP ANALYSIS - ULS DA1 Combination 2 3.2.1 Dimension of H Beam 3.2.2 Dimension of RC Panel 3.23. Tie Back Anchors 3.24 Design of waling beam. 4.0 APPENDIX 5.0 EXCERPTS FROM BS 8002: 1994 6.0 TRADE LICENCE 7.0 THIRD PARTY LIABILITY 8.0 SOIL REPORT - BORHOLE LOGS 9.0 SHOP DRAWINGS 10.0 RISK ASSSESSMENT Rev.0 22. p44Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Date'04-07-2002 Wiss, No, MST & DESIGNIEDITemp. RWIP-414 | Issue -O- Rev. No.0 | 1.0 141 INTRODUCTION The site is located at Damac Hills, Dubai. The existing ground level is +30.625 DMD. The excavation required for the construction of the pilecapifooting has necessitated anchored channel beam wall) H beam wall with concrete panel wall as shoring system along the Road side (Dewa corridor). The maximum excavation is -24.5 DMD from +30.625 m DMD. Sequence of Activities at Site 1. Trial trenches by the Contractor to locate all the under ground services, The services passing very close to the shoring system shall be brought to the notice of the Engineer for diversion or removal 2. Existing ground level is at +30.625 DMD. 3. Excavation and leveling. 4, Installation of the Double channel beam wall forall sections. 5. Excavation to +28.125 DMD along with installation of concrete panel for all sections. 6 Installation of waling beam for the Double beam wall shoring system. 7. Installation of tie back anchor for the Double beam wall through the waling beam fixed to the beams. 8 Stressing of the tie back anchors. 9 General excavation to final excavation level with installation of concrete panel 10. Construction of pile cap top up to +25.6 DMD and backfilling by main contractor. 11. Release of the tie back anchors and removal of the waling beam after the construction of the raft slab. Rev. 0 -3- p44Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wail Dater0a-07 2022 Mss. No, MST & DESIGN/ED/Temp. RWIP-414 | Issue -07- Rev. No.0 1.2 ‘Standards | Documents This method statement is based on the following documents. ICE Specification Project Specification B.S. 8004 - Foundations B.S -8110 — Structural use of Concrete. B.S - 8002 - Earth retaining structures. B.S - 8081 — Ground Anchorage BS EN 1534-2000 — Execution of special geotechnical work — sheet pile walls Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical Design P44Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Date04-07-2022 Wiss No, MST & DESIGNIED/Temp. RWIP-414 Tesue -01- Rev. No.0 13 MATERIALS 13.1 HBeam. According to B.S-4-Part-| , Grade 434 1.3.1.4 Concrete panel Conerete grade 30 N/mm Reinforcement grade 460 Nim? 1.3.1.2 Tie Back Anchors Anchor Strand diameter 0.6” — grade 1670 Nimm? Cement grout grade 25 Nimmé Rev. 0 P.4i4Method Statement & Design of Temp, Retaining Wail Dater04-07-2022, Wiss, No, MST & DESIGNIED/Temp. RWIP-a74 Tssue -01- Rev. No.0 14 Resources The folloving equipments are planned to use at site Drilling rig With accessories [~ = BG- 15/18-1No. for the borehole for H beam and Double H beam wall Installation. Services Crane: - —1No. Other accessories: 4. Tremie pipe / bucket 2. Generator. 3. Auger for 600 mm diameter. 4. Bucket for 600 mm diameter. 5. Cleaning bucket for 600 mm diameter. 6. Turntable for 600 mm diameter. 7. Kelly for BG 15/18, Rev. 0 P.4t4Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Dater04-07-2022 Wiss, No, MST & DESIGNIEDiTemp, RWIP-414 | Issue —01- Rev. No.0 15 Staff The following staff will be made available on site Projects Manager (Part Time) Project Manager. Safety officer. Foreman Operators Riggers Helpers Electrician, Welder & Mechanics (part time) PAN OHRR ENS Rev.0 “7: P.414Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Date04-07-2022 Miss. No. MST & DESIGNIEDITemp. RWIP-414 Tssue -OT- Rev. No. 0 Rev. 0 2.0 ANCHORED H BEAM WALL P.414Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Date 04-07-2022 Mss. No. MST & DESIGNIEDITemp. RWIP-414__] Tssue-07- Rev. No.0 2. 24 0 METHOD STATEMENT FOR H BEAM WALL WITH TIE BACK ANCHORS. GENERAL The site is located at Damac Hills, Dubai. The existing ground level is +30.625 DMD. The excavation required for the construction of the pilecapfooting has necessitated anchored channel beam wall/ H beam wall with concrete panel wall as shoring system along the Road side (Dewa corridor). The maximum excavation is -24.5 DMD from +30.625 m DMD. 2.2 RESTRAINED H BEAM WALL Restrained H beam wall shoring system is proposed for Section 1, In order to accommodate the tie back anchors, double H beams are proposed at 3.0 m cle for. Single H beams shall be placed in the centre position between the double H beams. To reduce the deflection of H beam wall to minimum it shall be restrained by a layer of tie back anchor at level defined by static calculations. A waling beam shall be welded fo the beam connecting all beams, at anchor location, The anchor will be stressed to the waling connecting all beams. 2.3 METHOD OF INSTALLATION In order to avoid un-allowed influence on adjacent buildings or roads, the Double channel beam will be located into predriled boreholes. For this purpose, a temporary casing of min, 3.0 m length wil be rotary into the soil. The borehole will be drilled by our rotary driling rig BG series using water to stabilize the borehole. The length of the embedment of the H beam depends on the particular statical requirements and will be defined in the structural analysis. The H beam shall be lited by crane and will be placed at the centre of the drilled hole vertically. The borehole will be filled with gravel up to the proposed excavation level. Above the proposed excavation level, the temporary casing wil be filed with granular soil or excavation materials (f suitable) and the temporary casing will be withdrawn by our driling rig, p44Wathod Statement & Design of Temp, Retaining Wall Date04-07-2022 Wiss, No. MST & DESIGNIEDiTemp. RWIP-414 Issue -O1- Rev. No.0 24 25 261 25.2 Rev. 0 PREPARATION OF DOUBLE CHANNEL BEAM Double Channel beam wil be fabricated by welding two Channel beam of suitable size side by side, The grade of steel shall confirm to B.S. 4, part 1, 1993 of grade 43A (S275). The space between the H beams will be maintained minimum 12 cm in order to accommodate the anchor. The plate that connecting the two beams shall extend beyond the web of each beam for proper connection. INSTALLATION OF TIE BACK ANCHORS GENERAL Tie back anchors shall be installed for the proposed Double H beam in order to reduce the bending moment deflection on the H beam wall and thereby reduced deflection on the wall top. Loads on each anchor and its dimensioning is made as elaborated in the design. INSTALLATION PROCEDURE A powerful Drill Wagon shall be used to install the tie back anchors, following sequence shall be adopted for the installation ofthe anchors. 2) Install the drill wagon at approximately the same level of the anchor head Adjust the swing mast to the required inclination to meet the designlsite requirement. Note: The mast of drill wagon can be rotated in all directions to accommodate the site requirements. b) Temporary steel casing of 130 mm dia shall be drilled through the soi! with the help of its water flush system. In order to prevent any escape of soil while driling, the casing shall be provided with an end plug. Note: Extreme care shall be taken to avoid any damage of underground =10- P4t4Mathod Statement & Design of Temp, Retaining Wall Date04-07-2022 Mss, No, MST & DESIGNIED/Temp. RWIP-414 | Tssue -07- Rev. No.0 structures while installing the anchor. In case of existence of any obstructions such as pile foundations, the direction of the anchors can be shifted to any adjustable mast if drill wagon(UBW) or the position of the anchor itself can be relocated. The diling system provided on UBW allows the operator to observe any obstruction, ©) After reaching the required anchor length, ready-made anchor with 1. No. grout pipe at the middle will be inserted into the casing. The temporary casing shall be withdrawn whilst filing the bore with primary cement grout. The grout will carry on until the grout has replaced the water in hole completely. 2.5.3 The coment arout mix desian will be as follows = Cement grout mixture (per batch): 2 bags cement = 100 kg 5Sliters water = 55kg ~ WIC ratio = 055 - Design compressive strength of the grout at 28 days = 25 N/mm? The equipment used for grout mixture: = ZMigrout mixer - KP60 pressure pump. Rev.0 1. PateWethod Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Datei04-07-2022 Mss, No, MST & DESIGNIED/Temp. RWIP-414 | Issue -0i- Rev. No.0 2.5.4 INSTALLATION OF WALING BEAM & ANCHOR STRESSING A.walling beam has to be installed connecting all the H beams at anchor location. 7 days after post grouting, the anchors shall be stressed and locked off to the required load, after grout compressive strength has achieved 60 to 70% of the design strength. A bearing angle plate to be welded to the H beam for the stressing of anchors. 2.5.4.1 Fixation of Bearing Plate to the Walling Beam The angle plates are welded to the Walling Beam to prevent slippage or loss of bearing surface for the anchors on the double U-Channel beam. Further the stressed anchors will act almost as a point of fixation. Anchor stressing up to 125% of the working load shall be carried out forall anchors. The detailed method statement for anchor acceptance testis given bellow. 2.5.4.2 ANCHOR ACCEPTANCE TEST 5% of anchorage used on this contract should be subjected to an acceptance test. The maximum proof load should be 125% of the working load for temporary anchors. The load displacement data should be plotted continuously over the range of 10% Tw to 125% Tw (working load). The load increment shall not be more than 50% Tw (working load), The procedure for the anchor acceptance test is given below" First Load Cycle % | Min. period of Observation (min.) 10 1 0 1 100 1 125 % 100 1 30 7 10 7 100 5 * The detailed load chart for acceptance test will be submitted minimum one week prior to the test for Engineer's approval Rev. 0 -12- P44Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Date 04-07-2022 Mss. No, MST & DESIGNIED/Temp. RWIP-414 | Issue -O1- Rev. No.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA «The proof load (125% of W.L) has not reduced during the 15 minutes by more than 5% after allowing temperature change and movement of the anchored structure. © The proof load can be maintained by jacking and the anchor head displacement monitored after 15 min. If the creep is less than 5% of elastic displacement of tendon, the anchorage deemed to be satisfactory. # Residual Load time data: If the rate of load losses reduces to 1% or less per time interval for these specific observation periods after allowing for temperature, structural movements of the tendon in accordance with the manufacturers data 2.5.4.3 DE STRESSING OF TIE BACK ANCHORS AND REMOVAL OF WALING BEAM After the construction of the pile capifooting top level at +25.6 DMD, the tie back anchors shall be de stressed by cutting the anchor head. The waling beam shall be removed from the installed position. The H beam shoring system will work as cantilever H beam as per the design given under section 1. 2.6 INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE PANELS The installation of the conerete panel between the H beam wall up to final excavation level to be done by Contractor. For the stability of the H beam, itis important that the ledges willbe installed in steps directly after the excavation (high free stands of the soil especially over a longer period must be avoided). The ledges must be fixed tight to the H beam and pressed against the undisturbed soil (see attached sketch). Any soil movements behind the H beam wall from over excavation or too high free stands must be avoided, In already excavated areas, the soil must be refilled in compacted layers. 2.7 DEWATERING The highest existing water table is at +20.45 DMD. Therefore no dewatering will be required. Rev. 0 -13- 414Method Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wal Date 0407-2022 | Mes, No, NST & DESIGNIEDITenip. RWIP-414 | Tssue-Oi- Rev Noo 2.10 DESIGN CRITERIA 2.10.1 Technical Description The design is based on the available soil report by Mis. Wimpey Laboratories, Report No: WAG2021-DXB-132 dated 20/05/2021. According to our attached calculation, the following shoring system is proposed, FOR SECTION - 4 - Max. Excavation from +30.625 DMD to +24.5 DMD. Double H beams and single H beams shall be placed altemate with top level at +30.625 DMD and toe level at -18.625 DMD is required for a safe excavation of +24.5 DMD. Center to center distance between the H beams shall be 1.5 m. The tie back anchors shall be installed from +28.625 DMD to restrain the beams at 3.0 m cle, Concrete panels shall be installed between the beams to retain the earth. Used Computer Program: WALLAP RETAINING WALL PROGRAM. 2.10.2 Surcharge Loads In our design we have assumed surcharge of 20 KNim? behind the shoring wall for all sections. 2.10.3 WALL STIFFNESS H Beam for section 1. Proposed beam size = 457x191x89 kg/m Moment of inertia of beam along XX axis = 41020 cm* Young's Modulus of steel 43108 KNim2 Spacing of beams = 150m Wallstifiness = 24 108x41020x 10-4 = 57.43 MNm2/m 1.50 Double Beam for section 1 Proposed beam size = 2457 x 191 x67 kgim Moment of inertia of beam along XX axis = ‘58760 cm* Young's Modulus of steet = 2.txc10® KNim? Spacing of beams = 150m Rev. 0 <14- P44Taathod Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Date:04-07-2022 Mss. No. MST & DESIGNED Temp. RWIP-414 Tssue -01- Rev. No.0 Wall stiffness = 24x 10'x 6.876 10-4 = 82.26 MNm/m 15 2.10.4 Soil Profile Dense SAND +30.625 DMD TO +24.65 DMD N value “38” Angle of repose 6 = 37 Unit weight of soil excluding ground water y = 18.8KNim? Unit weight of sol including ground water y1 = 208KNim3 Young's modulus of soil “=” = 38000 KNim2 Very Dense SAND +24.65 DMD to +22.65 DMD “N’ value “50° Angle of repose 6 = 39 Unit weight of soil excluding ground water y = 20.0KNim? Unit weight of soil including ground water y1 = 220KNim3 Young's modulus of soil “E” = 80000 KNim2 Sandstone/ Conglomerate below +22.65 DMD Angle of repose = 340 Unit weight of soil excluding ground water y = 220KNim? Unit weight of soil including ground water y1 = 22.0 KNIm3 Young's modulus of soil E” = 100000 kN/m2 Rev. 0 -18- p4499ST w5e8, COLE 08 Eig 3ST ZuoneulqWoD Ava SIN 856 7699 8087 8E a Ter ‘sig| * NOUD3S Teun THN eye (wy/n) (wu) (coauad Jeo 2e soa! aunssaud 30404 ANIWOW NoUDas }30¥04 WOHONY| wa | NOUISWIO | akc onianag | S¥)H2¥Oudav NoIs3a‘Wathod Statement & Design of Temp, Retaining Wal Date:04-07-2022, Miss. No, MST & DESIGNIED/Temp. RWIP-414 Tssue -07- Rev. No.0 3.0 DESIGN OF RESTRAINED DOUBLE BEAM / H BEAM WALL- SECTION 1 (Max. excavation from +30.625 DMD to +24.5 DMD) P44Wethod Statement & Design of Temp. Retaining Wall Datei04-07-2022 Mss. No, MST & DESIGNIEDiTemp. RWIP-414 Tesue -07- Rev. No.0 Rev.0 3.1 WALLAP ANALYSIS - SLS P44 17-NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division! Sheet No. Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision Ad4.B58.R48 Job No. e414 Licensed from GEOSOLVE Made by bata filename/Run ID: H beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd SLS Golf vita-shoring H bean +30.625 to +24.50 DMD Date: 4-07-2022 Checked unite: kN,m INPUT DATA SOIL PROFILE Steatun Elevation of | — Soil types = no. top of stratum Active side Passive aide 1 30.63 1 dense sand 1 dense sand 2 24.65 2 Very dense sand 2 Very dense sand 3 22.68 3. sandstone 3. sandstone SOIL PROPERTIES Bulk Young's At rest Consol Active Passive =- Soil type -- density Modulus coeff. state. limit limit Cohesion No. Description kN/m3. Eh, kN/m2 Ko —NC/OC| Ka kp e/a (watun elev.) (dBb/dy ) (aKo/dy) ( Mu} ( Rac) (pe ] ( do/dy 1 dense sand 18.503 38000 «0.398 oc_— 0.214 7.034 20/80 (0.300) (0-000) ¢ 0.000) 2 Very dense 201003 $0000 0.371 0c 198 8.208 sand 22-00 (0,300) (0-000) ¢ 0.000) 3 sandstone 22100 100000 9.440, 0c 02455675 (0.300) (0-000) ¢ 0.000) Note: (a) and (b) are Bulk Densities above and below the water table Additional soil paranaters associated with Ka and Kp “== paraneters for Ka parameters for Kp Soil wall Back» Soil fall Back- Soil type friction adhesion £111 friction adhesion fill No. Description ‘angie coeff. angie angle coeff. angle 1” dense sand 37,00 0.500' 0.00 37-00 0.500. 0.00 2 Very dense sand 39100 01500 0.00 38:00 0.500 0.00 3 sandstone 34100 01500 0.00 34.00 0.500 0.00 GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Density of water = 10.00 kN/m3 Active side Passive side Initial water table elevation 21.45, 21.45 Automatic water pressure balancing at toe of wall : No WALL PROPERFIES ‘Type of structure = Soldier Pile all Soldier Pile width = 0.19 Soldier Pile spacing = 1.50 m Passive mobilisation factor = 3.00 m Elevation of toe of wall = 18.63 Maximum finite element length = 0.60 = = 2,10008+08 kn/m2 Youngs modulus of all & Moment of inertia of wall I = 2.73472-04 ma/m run E.T = 57426 kN.m2/m run Yield Moment of wall = Not defined STRUTS and ANCHORS steut/ x-section Inclin Pre~ anchor Strut area_—-Youngs. Free ation stress Tension no. Elev. spacing of strut modulus length (degs) /strut allowed = sq.m ka/n2 xs 1 28.63 3.00 0,000695 2.005408 10.00 35.00 200.0 Xo 2 25160 1,00 1,000000 2.000207 10.00 0.00 0 Ko[SURCHARGE LOADS Surch Distance Length width Surcharge Equiv, Partial -arge fron parallel _perpend. vet/m2 soil” factor/ no. Elev. wall to wall to wall Near edge Far edge type Category 130,63 030A) 50-00 «30.00 20.00 = w/a 1.00. ~ Note: A= Active side, P = Passive side Limit State Categories e/U ~ Permanent Unfavourable P/P = Permanent Favourable Var ~ Variable (unfavourable) coNstRUCTION STAGES Construction Stage description stage no. = Apply surcharge no.1 at elevation 30.63, excavate to elevation 28.13 on PASSIVE side Install strut or anchor no.1 at elevation 28.63 Excavate to elevation 24.00 on PASSIVE side Install strut or anchor no.2 at elevation 25.60 Remove strut or anchor no.i at elevation 28.63 ACTORS OF SAFETY and ANALYSIS OPTIONS Limit State options: Serviceability Limit state ALL loads and soil strengths are unfactored Stability analysis: Method of analysis - Strength Factor method Factor on soil strength for calculating wall depth = 1.50 Parameters for undrained strata: Minimum equivalent fluld density = 5.00 ku/m3 Maximum depth of water filled tension crack = 0.00 m Bending monent and displacement calculation: Method - Subgrade reaction model using Influence Coefficients open Tension Crack analysis? ~ No Non-Linear Modulus Paraneter (L) = 10.00 m Boundary conditions: Length of wall (normal to plane of analysis) = 1000.00 m Width of excavation on active side of wall = 20,00 m Width of excavation on passive side of wall = 20.00 m Distance to rigid boundary on active side = 20.00 m Distance to rigid boundary on passive side = 20,00 m ‘ounpur oprrons stage Stage description ~ ‘output options no. Displacement. Active, Graph. Bending mon. Passive output Shear force’ pressures 1 Apply surcharge no-1 at elev. 30.63 Yes Yes Yes 2 Excav. to elev. 28.13 on PASSIVE side No No No 3 Install steut ho.1 at elev. 26.63 No No No 4 Excav. to elev. 24.00 on PASSIVE side ves yes Yes 5 install strut ho.2 at elev. 25.60 No No. No 6 Remove strut no.1 at elev. 28.63 yes ves ves * summary output yes - ves Program WALLAP - Copyright (C) 2012 by DL Borin, distributed by Gz0soLvE 69 Rodenhurst Road, London sé, UK. Tel: +44 20 8674 7251NATIONAL ENGINEERIN Program: WALLAP $ CONTRACTING (Piling 0: Version 6.05 Revision Ad Licensed from Data filename/Run ID: H bean +30.625 to +2 Golf vita-shoring H beam 130.625 to +24.50 bap vision) | Sheet No. } Job No, e414 @ [Made by : 4.5 dnd_Sis 1 ~ | Date: 4-07-2022 | Checked unite am Stage No.2 Excay. to eey, 2813 on PASSIVE side JUNI dense sand \Vaty dense sand 2145, 1863 3063 2833 dense sand 2465 Vey dense sand a Weter pressize (kN /n2]MATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division) | Sheet wo. Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A4d.858.R48 | Job No. | P-4e Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by + Data filename/Aun ID: H beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd SiS 1 Golf vita-snoring 1 H beam +30.625 to +24.50 DMD ' pate: 4-07-2022 Checked : units: Stage No. 2 Excavate to elevation 20.13 on PASSIVE side kam STABILITY ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall according to Strength Factor method Factor of safety on soil strength Fos for toe Toe elev. for elev. = 18.63 Fos = 1.800 Stage --- G.b. —- Strut Factor Moment toe Wall No. Act. Base, Elev. of + equilib, elev. Penetr Safety at elev. vation 2 30.69 26.13 cant, 2.701 20.02) 23.83 4.30 BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall ‘Analysis options Soldier Pile width = 0.19m; spacing = 1.50m Passive mobilisation factor = 3.000 Length of wall perpendicular to section = 1000.00m Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesq Influence coefficients Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached Rigid boundaries: Active side 20.00 from wall Passive side 20.00 from wall Limit state: serviceability Limit state Node ¥ Nett wall wall Shear Bending Strut no. coord pressure disp. rotation force moment © forces ia/m2 ” rad. ki/m Kinin n/m 1 30.63 0.00 0.008 1.988-03 0.0 0.0 2 30.31 2.090.008 1888-03 0.3 ot 3 3000 452 0.007-1.888-03 14 og 4 29.40 7193 0.006 1868-03 sua 2.2 5 29.02 9178 0.008 1848-03 Bs ao 6 28.63 11:51 0.005 2.798-03 «12.6 Bs 7 28113 13168 0.0041 gse-03 18-9 16.7 8 27157-2240 0.003 1468-03 16.4 ant 9 27.00 -26.20 0.002-1.158-03 27 35:0 10 26.40 © -15.70 0.002 @.048-04 9.9 32.7 11 26.00 © -6.07 001 5.348-04 14.2 2715, 12 25.60 0,790,001 4.248~04 | =-15.3 21.3 43 25.13 6112 0.0012. 77E-04 13.6 142 14 24.65 9132 0.001 L.s4e-04 © =10.0 8.4 3142 0.001 Lisgz-og = 10.0 8.4 1S 24.33 5.26 0.001 1.458-04 -8.6 5.3 16 24.00 6158 0.001 -1.2zE-0¢ 6.6 28 3723.40 8135 01001 «1.07E-04—=2.2 o.0 1B 23.03 9134 0,001 1088-04 142 012 19 22165 10.34 —«0.001_—1-068-04 ue 0.8 =1128 0.001 1,06E-04 ve 0.8 20. 22.08 4124. 0.0018 -85E-05, a 2.5 21 21145 1.930.000 6-22-08 -0.5 26 22 20.93 0161 0.000 4:128-05 = 2.0 23° 20.40 0118 0.000 2.576-05 1.2 14 2413.80 0165 0.000 «151E-05 1.0 oun 25 19.22 0186 0.000 1.096-05 0.5 0.2 26 18.63 0199 0.000 1008-05 0.0 = -0.0Run ID. H beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd Sus | sheet No. Golf vita-shoring ~ | Date: 4-07-2022 H bean +30.625 to +24.80 DMD 1 Checked : (continued) Stage No.2 Excavate to elevation 28.13 on PASSIVE side Node ¥ ~ ACTIVE side ~ no. coord Effective stresses Total Soil Water Vertic Active Passive farth earth stiffness press. -al_ limit limit. pressure pressure coeff. ka/m2eN/m2 N/m N/m KN/ni2 kev/m2—kN/m3 290.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00, 0.00 13954 2 30:31 0.00 9.77 2.09 68.75 2.09 2109a 13854 3 30,00 0.00 22.08 4152148131452 asza 13954 4 29149 0.00 37.03.7193 260.47 72.83 193a 13954 5 29.02 0.00 #5163 9178 © 320.95 9.78 317ea 13984 6 26.63 0.00 $3.73 11.81 37719311151 1iisla 13954 7 28113 0.00 63.86 13.68 449.22 13.68, 13/683 13954 0100 63.86 13.68 «171.60 13.68, 13168a 13954 @ 27.57 0.00 75.03 16.08 203-01. 16.08, is.08a 13954 9 27100 0.00 86-02 18.43 233.85 18.43, 18143a 13954 10 26.40 0.009757 20.91 266.50 22.15 zis 13954 1226.00 0.00 105123 22/85 288.07 28.06, 28106 13954 12 25.60 0,00 112.86 24,19 309.57 33.85, 338513954 33 25113 0.00 121190 26112 335.03 39.60, 39.60 13954 14 24168 0100 130190 28:05 360.43 4451 aals1 13954 0.90 130190 25153 418.14 34.85 38.85 18360, 15 24.33 0.00 137144 26.80 © 439.42 42.05, 420518360, 36 24100 0.00 143198 28.08 460.68 © 45.05, 45.05 18360 a7 23140 0100 186-02 30.42 499.87 50.32 50:32 18360 38 23103 0.00 163.53 31.89 524.33 $3.57 53.57 18360 19 22165 0100 171.03. 3335 548.76 S611 56.81 18360 0100 171703 41190 386.79 $9.73 59.73 36720 20 22.05 0.00 184.22 45113 17-41 66.93 66.93 36720 21 21145 0.00 197.40 48.36 447.99 73.80 73180 36720 22 20.93 $125 203.66 49.90 462-54 77.19 82.44 36720 23° 20.40 10.50 209.91 51.43 477.07 80.35 90.85 36720 24 19180 16.50 217-05 53.18 493.66 83.75 «100.25 36720 25 19122 22135 223.99 $4.88 $09.80 86.97 109.32, 36720 26 18.63 28.20 230.92 $6.57 525.83 80.15 118.35 36720 Node ¥ PASSIVE side ~ no. coord “Eefective streseee - Total Soil Water Vertic Active Passive farth earth stiffness Press. -al_ limit limit pressure pressure coeff. w/m2 N/m? N/m N/m /2 yav/m2— N/m 1 30.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00, 0.0 2 30.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 3 30.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 0100 © 0.00 0.00 010 4 29140 0.00 0:00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.0 5 29.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 00 © 28.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00) 0.00 0.0 7 28113 0.00 0.00 0,00, 0.00 0.00 0.0 0100 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 20739, a 27.57 0100 10.62.2128 38.48, 38:48p 20739 9 27100 0100 21-25 4155 68.48 aales 20799 10 26:40 0.00 32:54 6.97 100.35 3686 20738 1126.00 0.00 40.07 8.89 121.60 341320799 12 25.60 0.00 47.60 10.20 142.86 33108 20739 13 25113 0:00 56.56 12112 168.12 33148 20799 1424165 0.00 65.53 14108 193.41 3511820789 0100 65.53 12.78 21.13 3514327368 1524.33 000 72:06 14108 242.38 36.80 27368 16 24.00 0.00 78.53 15133 263.65 3816727368 17231400100 90.67 17268 302.96 49727368Run 1D. # beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd_sLs. | Sheet No. cole vita-shoring | Date: 4-07-2022 H beam +30.625 to +24.50 DMD | Checked : (continued) Stage No.2 Excavate to elevation 28.13 on PASSIVE side Node oy PASSIVE side — no. coord ~ Effective stresses - Total Soil Water Vertic Active Passive Earth earth stiffness press. -al_ limit Limit pressure pressure coeff N/m? kW/n2_—KN/m2—_N/2N/ kN/m2 N/m ae 23,03 0.00 98.23 19.16 327.56 44.23 44.23 27368 19 22.65 0.00 105.80 20.63 352.18 46.47 460727368 0.00 105.80 25.92 255.28 67.01 67.01 54735, 20 22.08 0.00 118.13 29:19 286.14 71.17 Tay 54735 21 21145 0100 132.88 32.46 «317.08 75.73 75.73 $4735 22 20.93 5.25 138.93 34.04 332.01 77.80 3.05 $4735 23° 20.40 10.50 145.40 35.62 346.99 80.16 50.65 84735, 24 19.80 16.50 152.81 37.44 364.13 89.11 99.61 54735, 25 19.22 22.35 160.06 39.21 380.90 86.11 108.46 «54735, 26 18.63 28.20 167.33 41.00 397.72 «89.16 «117.36 © 84735. Note: 18.43a. Soil pressure at active limit 38.48 Soil pressure at passive LimitNATIONAL ENGINEERING Program: WALLAP bata £11 Golf vita-shoring H beam +30.625 to +24.50 OMD 2000. conmRact ine Version 6.05 name/Run ID: # beam Bering moment AN n/m ur) (Piling Division) Revision A44.B58,R48 jicensed From GROSOLVE 0.625 to +24.5 dnd_SLS Sheet No. Job No. P-4lé Made by pate: 4-07-2022 Checked. units: Xiym Stage No.2 Excay.to elev. 2.13 on PASSIVE side Displacement) 200 0 Elev a To00 to dey. 28.13 on PASSIVE side 2000 Nett pressure (kN/m2] 0 Passive pressure (kN/n2}NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division) Program: WALLAP Version 6. Sheet No. 05 Revision A¢4.B58.R48 ob No Licensed from Made by bata ELtename/aun Golf vita-shoring B beam +30 O +24.50 DMD 1 1 i Di H beam +30.625 to 424.5 dnd Sus 1 i 1 eer 4 ked + ch Stage No3 Install stut no at elev. 28.63 3063 dense sand dense sand 24.68 Vary dense sand Very dense sand 2068 2145, = 1263 “se v 7 S 30 ‘Water pressure (KN/n2}Sheet No. Job No. P-414 Made by + NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division) Program? WALLAP Version 6.08 Revision Aéd.B58.RIg Licensed from GEOSOLVE Data filenane/Run ID: H beam +30.625 to #24.5 dd SLS Golf vita-shoring ~ H bean +30.625 to +24.50 oMD Date: 4-07-2022 Units: i,m Stage No. 3 Install strut or anchor no.1 at elevation 28.63 STABILITY ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall according to Strength Factor sethod Factor of safety on soil strength Fos for toe Toe elev. tor elev. = 18.63 F08 = 1.500 _--- strut Factor woment Toe Wall No. Act. Pass. Elev, of + equilib. elev. Penetr safety at elev. sation 3 30.63 28.13. 28.63 Conditions not suitable for FoS calc. BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wail ‘Analysis options Soldier Pile width = 0.19m7 spacing = 1.5m Passive mobilisation factor = 3.000 Length of wall perpendicular to section = 1000.00m Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesg Influence coefficients Soil deformations aze elastic until the active or passive limit is reached Rigid boundaries: Active side 20.00 from walt Passive side 20.00 from wall Limit State: Serviceability Limit state Mode x nett. want want Shear Bending Strut ‘no. coord pressure disp. rotation force moment. © forces kw/n2 2 rad. ka/m kN.m/m—kni/m 1 30.63 0.00 0.007-1.858-03 too 2 30131 15183-00071 -85E-03, on 3 30.00 18115 0.0061 -848-03, 17 4 29140 21124 0005 1.788-03, 919 5 29.02 22.61 «00041 -698-03, 190 6 28163 23146 00041. 828-03, 316 54.6 23146 0.004 1528-03 aile 7 28.13 23167 0.003 1.278-03, 25.8 8 27157 1111-90021 028-03 24.3 9 27100-22154 0.002 7.79B-04 26.0 10 26:40 814301001 5.258-08 22.5 11 26.00 © -2103 0.001 3-84-04 18 22 25.60 2151 0.001 2.768-04 13,0 33° 25113 6.06 0.001 1.918-04 a7 1424.65 8149 0.001 1.43E-04 38 213301001 1.43E-04 a8 15 24.33 3leq o.oo. 1278-04 us 36 24:00 5105 0.001 1.208-04 ola a7 23140 6198 0.001. 1.23E-04 -019 38 23.03 8120 0.001 1.28B-04 -018 1922165 9146 0.001 1.26E-04 Lt -9103 0.001 1.26x-04 at 20 22.05 8123 -0.001 1058-04 310 21 21-45-2136 0.000 7.30B-05, 31 22 20.93 0.730.000 4758-05, 21s 23 20.40 0128 0.000 2878-05 6 24 19.80 0181 0.0001 618-05 ole 25 19.22 Llof 0.090 111-05 0.2 26 18.63 1118 0.000 1.008-05 -010Run ID. H beam +30.625 to 24.5 dnd_sts | Sheet No. Golf vita-shoring | Date: 4-07-2022 H beam +30.625 to +24.50 DMD | checked : (continued) Stage No.3 Install strut or anchor no.1 at elevation 28.63 Node ¥ ACTIVE side ~ no. coord Effective stresses Total Soll Water Vertic Active Passive Barth earth stiffness press. -al_ limit limit’ pressure pressure coeff. ka/m2—kN/m2—KN/m2_—KN/m2_ N/m kw/n2k/m3 2 30.63 0,00 0.00 0.00, 0.00 9.00 0.00 © 11068, 2 30131 0100 9.772109 68.75 15.83 15.83 11068 3 30.00 0.00 21.08 ©4152 148.31 «18.15 1el1s — La088 % 281400100 37.03 7.83 -260.47 21.28 2124-11068 5 29.02 0.00 45.63 9.78 «320.95 22.61 22161 11068 6 26163 0,00 $3.73 11181377193 23.46, 23.46 11068, 7 28:13 0.00 63.86 13768 © 449.22 23.67 23.67 11068 0100 63.86 13.68 171.60 23.67 23.67 11088. 3 27.57 0.00 75.03 16.08 203.01 23.32 23132 lose. 9 27100 0,00 86-02 18.43 233.95 23.08 23.08 11068 10 26.40 0.00 97.57 20.81 266.50 23.61 23161 11068, 11 26100 0.00 105.23 22.55 288-07 28.43) 29143 11068, 12 25160 0.00 iiz-86 24118 © 309.57 34.43) 34143 11068, 13 25113 100 121.90 26:12 335.03 39.57 39.57 13065, 1424165 000 130.80 28105 360.43 44.09, 440913065, 0100 130.90 25.53 4ie.1a 38.30 38.30 17191 15 24.33 0100 137-44 26.80 439.42 41-34 alae 17181 16 24100 0.00 143-98 28.08 © 460.68 44.28, 4ac28 17191 17 23/40 0100 156.02 30.42 499.87 49.64 49.64 17191 18 23103 0.00 163.53 31.89 524133 53.00 53.00 17191, 1922.65 0100 171.03 33.35 548.76 56138 56.38 17391 0.00 171703 41130 386.79 58.85, 58.85 34382 20 22.05 0.00 194.22 45113 417-41 bad 66.¢¢ 34382 21 21145 0.00 197.40 48136 447.99 73.59 73159-34382 22 20193 $125 203.66 49.90 462-54 77.13 82.38 34302, 23° 20.40 10.50 209.91 51143 477.07 80.37 90.87 44272 24 19180 16.50 217.05 53.18 493.66 83.83 «100.33 «44272 25 19122 22135 223.99 $4188 509.80 87.06 109.41 44272 26 18163 28.20 230.92 56.57 525.93 90.24 © 118.44 44272 Node ¥ PASSIVE side ~ no. coord EEfective stresses < total Soil Water Vertic Active Passive Earth earth stiffness press. al limit limit’ pressure pressure coeff. RN/m2—KN/m2— N/m N/m K/n2 ki/m2 N/m 1 30.63 0,00 0,00 9,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0, 2 30:31 0.00 9.00 0.00 9:00 0.00 0:00 0.0 3 30100 0,00 0,000.00 0:00 0.00 0.00 0.0 4 29140 0100000 0.00 000 0.00 0,00 0.0 5 29.02 0.00 0,00 0.00 9100 0.00 0:00 0.0 6 28163 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 0,00 0.0 7 28113 0:00 1000.00 0100 0.00 0,00 0.0 0.00 0:00 0-00 0:00 0.00 000 21454 @ 27.87 0100 10.62 2.28 38.dB 243 24143 21454 9 27.00 0.00 21:25 4155 68.48 35.62 35:62 21454 1026.40 0032-54 6.97 100.35 32.10 3211021454 Ai 26.00 0.00 401078158 Azt.60 31.46 314s 21454 12 28160 0.00 47-60 10.20 142-86 31.93 3193 i454 13 25113 0.00 56.56 12112 68.12 33.52, 3381 13065, 1424165 0065.53 14.04 193-41 35.60 35.60 13068, 0100 65.53 12.78 «221-13 35.98 35.98 17151, 1S 24.33 0.00 -72.06 14.05 242-38 37.52 378117131 16 24100 0.00 78:88 18.33 263.65 39.24 39.2@ © mst 17 23140 0100 90.67 17.68 © 302.96 42.65. 42.65 17181,Run ID. 4 beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd_sLs. | Sheet No. Golt vita-shoring | Date: 4-07-2022 H bean +30.625 to +24.50 DMD | checked + (continued) Stage No.3. Instali strut or anchor no-1 at elevation 28.63 Node ¥ PASSIVE side - no. coord Effective stresses = Total Soil Water Vertic Active Passive farth earth stiffness press. al limit ‘limit pressure pressure coeff. KN/m2 N/m KN/m2_—KN/m2_KN/ kai/n2 N/m 18 23.03 0.00 98.23 19.16 327.56 44.79, 44.79 17191 19 22.65 0.00 105.80 20.63 352-18 46.91 469217181 0:00 105.80 25.92 255.25 67.88 67.98 34382 20 22.08 0,00 119113 29.19 2e6.1¢ 71-67 71le7 34382 21 21145 0.00 132-48 32.46 317.08 75.95 75.95 34382, 22 20.93 $125 138.93 34104 © 332.01-77-86 = 83.11 34382 23° 20.40 10150 145140 35.62 346.98 80.13 50.63 44272 24 19.80 16.50 152-81 37.44 364.13 83.03 99.53 44272 25 19.22 22135 160.06 39.21 380.90 86.02 108.37 44272 26 18.63 28.20 167.33 4100 397.72 89.06 «117.26 © 44272NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTI Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 NG (piling Division) Revision A¢4.258.R42 Ldcenged from GEOSOLVE bata filename/Aun ID: # beam + Golf vita-shoring H bean +30.625 to +24.50 DMD 30.625 to +24.5 dnd SLS Sheet No, ob No.” Beata Made by st Units: kN,m tage No.3 Insal st o.1 at elev. 2263 Displacement (ni) 0 ‘Shear fores[kN/m run} ete pce Nn Stage No.3 Install stut no at elev. 28.63 Nat recs (2 2000 0 Passive pressure (kN/n2} 200NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division} Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision Ad4.B58.848 Licenses fron GEOSOLVE filename/Run 1D: H beam +30.625 to +2¢.5 ded SES Units: kN,m Stage Nod Excay. to lev. 24.00 on PASSIVE side 3063 28.83 dense cand 2465 24,00 Very dense sand Vey dense sand 1863 Ei] a 50 a Water pressure kN/n2}NATIONAL ENGINEZRING CONTRACTING (Piling Division) | sheet No, Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision Ad4.B58.R4 | dob No,” p-a14 Licensed from GEOSOLVE | wade by : Data filename/Run 1D: H beam +30.625 to +24.5 dna SLs 1 Golf vita-shoring | Date: 4-07-2022 H beam +30.625 to +24.50 DMD | checked : x Stage No. ¢ Excavate to elevation 24.00 on PASSIVE side SUABILITY ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall according to Strength Factor method Factor of safety on soil strength Fos for toe Toe elev. for elev. = 18.63 Fos = 1.500 Stage --- G.L, —- Strut Factor Moment Toe Wall No. Act. Bass, lev. of equilib, elev, Penetr safety at elev. ration 430.63 24.00 © 28.63 1.958 n/a 20.68 3.32 BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall Analysis options Soldier Pile width = 0.197 spacing = 1.50m Passive mobilisation factor = 3.000 Length of wall perpendicular to section © 1000.00n Subgzade reaction model - Boussinesq Influence coefficients Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached Rigid boundaries: Active side 20.00 from wall Passive side 20.00 from wall Limit State: Serviceability Limit state Node oy Nett. walt fall Shear Bending strut no. coord pressure disp. rotation Force moment forces kW/m = rad. kum RN a/mK/ 1 30,63 0.00 © 0,007 ~4. 368-04 0.0 0.0 2 30131 12.31.0074 365-08 ais on 3 30100 10.55 0.007 -4-408-04 8i5 aa 4 29%40 7193 0.007 ~4. 788-04 11.0 60 5 23.02 9278 01007 -5.358-08 4a 10.9 6 28163 11151 0.008 -6.308-08 18.5 11a 66.9 ailst 0.008 ~6.308-04 48.4 173 728.13 ales 0.008 6-828-049-4212 513 8 27:57 16.08 «0.008 -S.21B-04 = -3317 27.4 9 27.00 18.43 0.008 -1lazB-04 ©2318 41.5 10 26.40 20.91 0.008 3.04z-0 © 1211-518 12 26.00 22155 -0,008.-«6.778-04 = =314 55.2 12 25160 24118 ©0008 1 -068~03 blo -8a8 13° 25:13 26:12 «0007114903 1718 49.3 14 24165 28105 0,006 1.85E-03 © 30.7 -37.9 25.83 0,006 Lase-03 30.7, =37.9 1524.33 26.80 0,006 -2.038-03 39.2, ~26.6 16 24.00 28.08 «040082 ,14E-03 48.1 12-4 7 23140-25199 00042 /11R-03 48.8 ae. 1823.03 45.53 01003 11338-03354 3517 1922165 26.61 0,002 -1,676-03 21.8 46.2 42156 01002 «1.67B-03 21.8 46.2 20 22.05 49:10 ©0002, L,14E~03 5.7 54.4 2121145 11,94 010016 135E-04 —-24.0 4314 22 20193 517@ 07001 3.038-04=25.6 29.2 23° 20140 12.89 «0,001 9,468-05 — -20.7 16.5 24 19180 13167 0.001 -2.53R-05-12.7 4 25° 19122 11110-01001 -6.48E-05 35.9 13 26 18.63 7265 01001 ~7,158-05 010 -0.0 At elev. 28.63 Strut force 200.8 kN/strut =" 66.9 kN/m run (horiz.) = 81.7 N/m run (inelined)Run ID. # beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd_sus | sheet No. Golf vita-shoring | bate: 4 H beam 130.625 to +24.50 DMD | Checked (continued) Stage No.4 Excavate to elevation 24.00 on PASSIVE side Wode —¥ ACTIVE side ~ no. coord - Effective stresses Total Soil Water Vertic Active Passive Earth —earth_ stiffness press. -al_ limit limit pressure pressure coeff. kw/md—ka/n2 N/m RN N/m kw/m2—_kN/m3. 130.63 0.00 0.00 0.00, 0.00 0.00 0,00 100544 2 30.31 0.00 9.77209 6.75 32-32 a2i31 20584 3 30.00 0.00 21-08 4152 148.31 10.55 10.55 8570 4 29.40 4.00 37.03.7193 260.87 7.83 93a 8878 S 29102 0.00 45.63 9.78 «320.95 9.78 Bitsa e578 6 28.63 0.00 93.73 1523771931181 aisle 8578 728113100 63.85 13.68 449.22 13.68 13168a 8570 8 27:57 0.00 75.03 16.08 527.75 16.08 16.08a 8578, 9 27:00 0.00 86.02 18.43 605.07 18.43 1el43a 8578 10 26.40 0.00 97-57 20.91 686.35 20.81 20.912 8578 1126.00 0.00 105.23 22.85 780.22 22.55, 2215888578 12 25.60 0.00 112.86 24.18 793.90 24.38 2aliea 8578. 13° 25.13 0100 121.90 26:12 857.45 26.12, 26.128 8578 1424.65 0.00 130-30 28.08 920.81 28.05 28.052 8578 0100 130.90 28:53 1073.93 25.53 25.534 11287 15 24.33 0100 137144 26.80 1127.60 26.80 26.80a 11287 16 24,00 0.00 143.98 28.08 1181.19 28.08, 28.08a 11287 0.00 143.98 28.08 451.21 28.08 28.08a 11287 17 23.40 0100 196-02 30.42 490-39 30.42 30142a 11287 18 231030100 263.53 31:89 Si4.ad 31.89 3ulaga 11287 19 22168 0.00 171.03 33.35 539.26 38.82 35162 11287 0.00 171.03 41.80 374.86 © 41.90 41190222575 20 22,08 0.00 184.22 45113 408.46 45.13 45.132 22575 21 21145 0100 197.40 48.36 436.03 60.82 60.81 22575 22 20.93 5125 203.66 49.90 480.57 69.08 743322878 23 20140 10.50 209.91 51.43 465.10 74.12 e462 22575 24 19.80 16.50 217.05 83.18 481.68 77.63, 941322875 25° 19.22 22135 223199 $4.88 497.82 80.08 102.39 22575 26 18.63 28.20 230.92 $6.57 513.94 2.16 110.36 22878 Node ¥ PASSIVE side ~ no. coord - Eefective atresses otal soil Water Vertic Active Passive Garth earth stiffness press. -al_ limit limit pressure pressure coeff. Kh/m2—KN/m2—KM/m2_—KN/idN/ 2 kN/m2 N/m 1 30.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 © 0.00 0.00, 0.00 0.0 2 30.31 0:00 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 9.00 0.0 3 30:00 0:00 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 0:00 0:0 4 29.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 9.00 o.0 S 29.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0 6 28163 0.00 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 0100 0.0 7 28:13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 0,00 0.0 8 27157 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 © 0.00 D100 0.0 9 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 © 0.00 0:00 0.0 10 26.40 0:00.00 0.00, 0,00 9.00 0:00 0:0 11 26:00 0:00 0.00 9.00 0,00 0.00 0:00 0.0 12 25.60 0:00 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 0:00 0.0 13° 25113 0:00 0.00 0.00, 0,00 0.00 0.00 010. 11 24168 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0-00 0.00 0.0 15 24133 0:00 0.00 0.00, 0100 0.00 0.00 0.0 16 24100 0:00 0.00 9.00 0100 0.00 0:00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 100 2705 a7 23.49 0100 12.00 2134 = 56.41 86.41 s6éip 27058 18 23103 0100 «19.51 318080184 77.42 714227088Run 1D. H beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd sts | Sheet No. Golf vite-shoring | Date: 4-07-2022 W beam +30.625 to +24.50 DMD | Checked : {continued} Stage No.4 Excavate to elevation 24.00 on PASSIVE side Node ¥ PASSIVE side ~ no. coord ~ bffective stresses Total Soil Water vertic Active Passive Earth earth stiffness press. -al_ limit limit pressure pressure coeff. kav/m2—da/m2KN/m2_— N/m N/m kw/n2—k/m3 19 22.65 0,00 27.02 5.27 108.28 62.43 62.43 27058 0100 27.02 6.62 84-46 8446 84.46p 94117 20 22.08 9.00 40.25 9.86 115.18 84.24 gal2a 54117 21 2143 0,00 53.81 13.11 145.89 72.75 72.78 54217 22 20193 5125 59.89 14.67 160.66 63.30 66.55 54117 23° 20.40 10150 66.30 16.24 175.51 61.23 71:73 sant? 24 19180 16:50 73.67 18.05 192.56 63.87 0.47 54217 25 19122 22135 80.90 19.82 209.30 68.93 91.28 $4217 26 18.63 28.20 98.19 21.61 226.14 74.51 «102.71 5417 Note: 48.13a Soil pressure at active Limit 8446p Soil pressure at passive limitNATIONAL Program Data filename/Run ID: Golf vita-shoring H beam 130.625 to WALLAP Vs 4.80 DMD ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division} 1 sion 6.05 Revision A4d 1 Licensed from GEOSOLVE i H beam 430.625 to +24.5 dnd_sis I 1 ' 58.848 Sheet No. Job No. | Pala Made by : Date: 4-07-2022 checked amo Stage No.4 Encav. to lev. 24.00 on PASSIVE side Bending momert{kN.r/m un) 0 209) 2.04000 Displacement) Q ‘04000 a a Eley. a Stage No.4 Excay to elev. 24.00 Act presse (kNn2) 20 1000. lon PASSIVE side Nat renee AN a Elev a a 0 Pessive pressure (kN/n2}NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division! | Sheet Wo. ean: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A44.858.R49 | Job No. ” Paid Licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by bata Eilename/Run 1D: H beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd_SLS Golf vita-shoring H bean +30.625 to 424.50 DMD unite: Walym StageNe6 Remove stutno.1 atelev. 2263, NULL —_28 dence sand 25.60 24.65 2400 SS ccamnaasananannaaeameadal Very dense sand Vewy dense sand 22.85 a Water pressure (kNn2]Sheet No. Job Wo. P-4l4 Made by + NATIONAL, ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division) Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision AGd.853.RiB Licensed from GZOSOLVE Data filenane/Run ID: Hl beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd SLs Golf vita-shoring H beam +30.625 to 424.50 oH Date: 4-07-2022 Checked + Units: kN,m Stage No. 6 Remove strut or anchor no. at elevation 28.63 STABILITY ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall according to strength Factor method Factor of safety on soil strength Fos for toe Toe elev. for elev. = 18.63 Fos = 1.500 Stage --- G.L. --~ strut Factor Moment Toe Wall No. Act, Pass. Elev, of equilib. elev. Penetr safety at elev. zation 6 30.63 24.00 25.60 Conditions not suitable for FoS calc. BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall ‘Analysis options Soldier Pile width = 0.19: spacing = 1.50m Passive mobilisation factor = 3.000 Length of wall perpendicular to section = 1000.00m Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesg Influence coefficients Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached Rigid boundaries: Active side 20.00 from wall Passive side 20.00 from wall Limit State: Sexviceability Limit state Node ¥ Nett wall walt Shear Bending Strut no. coord pressure disp. rotation force moment. forces ia /m2 2 ad. kW/m RNm/m = KN/m 1 30.63 0.00 0.038 6.512-03 0.0 0.0 2 30.31 2,090,036 6.518~03 0:3 W011 3 30.00 4152 olos¢ 6518-03 iM 0.3 4 29.40 719301030 6.508-03 5.1 ut 5 29.02 9178 01027 6.4BB-03 als as 6 28163 12.51 0.028 6.43E-03 12.6, 8.4 7 28113 13.68 = 0.022 6.33E-03 18.9 16.3 8 27157 1608 0,018 6 10B-03. 27.3, 26.7 9 27.00 g.43 LIS. S.72B-03 37.1 49.1 10 26.40 20.91 0.012 5.07R-03 48.9 75.3, LL 26.00 © 22:55 0,010 4.4703 57.6 96.4 12 25.60 24:18 9.008 3.7203 © 66.3 ALLL SLT zalla—010083.726-03-84.2— 1211 13° 25.13 371450006. 2187-03 ~68.6 83.8 ak 24.65 441870008. 2-29-03 -50.0 54.9 47.66 0.008 _2.23n-03 | -50.0 54.9 15 24.33 50.09 -01004.«-2.02R-03 -34.2 a2 16 24.00 $0.38. 0,004 1.81R-03-17.8 32.9 1723140 17159-00031 50R-03, 2.6 27.8 ie 23.03 -12,21 0,002.1. 318-03, 316 3110 19 22.65 3:14 0,002.1 .108-03, on 32.0 4139 01002 1.108-03 on 3210 20° 22.08 27153 0.0017.49E-04 —~6.3 3610 21 21143-6138 00014-12809 16.4 28.5 22 20.93 4124 01001 1198s-08-17.0 19.0 23 20140 8173 0,001 .968-05 13.6 10.7 24 19/80 9105 01001 =2.758-05 8.2 an 25 19.22 7901001 -4.268-05 3.5 08 26 18.63 4276 0,001 ~4.682-05 0:0 -0.0 Ar elev. 25.60 strut force Asie] kN/strut =" 181.1 kN/m runRun 1D. # beam +30.625 to 24.5 dnd SLs | Sheet No. Golé vita-shoring | pate: 4 H beam +30.625 to +24.50 DMD | Checked 71-2022 (continued) Stage No.6 Remove strut or anchor no.1 at elevation 28.63 Node ¥ ~ ACTIVE side no, coord Effective stresses Total Soil Water Vertic Active Paseive Earth earth stiffness press. -al_ limit. ‘Limit. pressure pressure coeff. KN/m3—KN/m2_—KN/m2_ N/m K/m2. vain kN /m3 1 30.63 0,00 0,000.00, 0.00 0.00, 0.00 © 13406, 2 30.31 0.00 9.772109 68.75— 2.09, 21092 13406, 3 30.00 0,00 21,0842 348.31 4.52 ais2e 13406, 4 29140-0100 37,037.93 260.47 7.933, 713313406 5 29.02 0,00 45,63 9.78 © 320.95 9.78 9.783 13406 6 28.63 0.00 53.73 11.52 377.83. LLL iiisia 13406 7 28113 0.00 63.86 13.68 449.22 13.68 13.682 13406 8 27:57 0100 75.03 16.08 527.75 16.08, 16.08a 13408 9 27100 0100 86.02 18.43 605.07 18.43, ie.43a 13406 10 26:40 010097157 20.91 686.35 20.91 20.91a 13408, 11 26,00 0.00 105.23 22.88 740.22 22.55. 22155a 13406, 12 25.60 0,00 112.06 2418 793.90 24.18, 24.18a 13406, 13 25:13 0100 121.90 26112 887.45 37.45. 37145 13017 1424265 0.00 130.90 28-05 920.81 44.87 44le7 13017 0:00 130.90 25.53 1073.93 47.66 476s 17128 1S 24.33 0,00 137144 26.80 1127.60 50.09, 50.09 17128 16 24.00 0100 143198 28.08 1181.19 50.38 50.38 17128 0100 143.98 28.08 452.21 90.38, 50.38 «17128 1723.40 0100 186.02 30.42 490.39 47.58 475917128, 1g 23.03 0100 163.53 31.89 514.84 45.01, 4501 7128 19 22165 0,00 171.03 33.35 $38.26 45.06 45.06 17128, 0100 171703 41,80 374.86 60.29 60.33 34256 20 22.08 0400 184.22 45113 405146 53.63 53.63 34256 21 21145 0100 197-40 48136 436.03 63.00 63.00 34256 22° 20.93 5.25 203.66 49.90 450.57 68.31, 73156 36835, 23° 20.40 10,50 209.81 $1143 465.10 72.04 825¢ 36536 24 19.80 16150 217.05 53.18 481.68 «75.32, oile2 36836 25 19122 22135 223.99 94.88 «497.82 78.08 © 100.43 36536, 26 18.63 28120 230.92 56.57 513.94 80.72 108.92 36836 Node ¥ PASSIVE side - no, coord - Efgective stresses Total Soil. Water Vertic Active Passive Barth earth stiffness press. -al_ init limit pressure pressure coeff. RN/m2 —Kat/m2— N/m N/m KN/m2. ka/n2—kN/m 1 30,63 0.00 0.00 0.00» 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 2 30:31 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00, oo 3 30100 0:00 0.00 0.00 900 0.00 0.00, 0.0 4 29140 © 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0100 0.0 5 29.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 © 0,00 0:00 0.0 6 28.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0100 0,00 90.00 0.0 7 28:13 0:00 0.00 0.00 100 0.00 0:00 0.0 8 27.87 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 0,00, 0:00 9:0 9 27.00 0:00 9.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0100 0.0 10 26.40 0:00 0.00 0.00, 0,00 0:00, 0.00) 010 1126100 01000-00000 1000.00 0.00 0.0) 12 25.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 13. 25113 0:00 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.00, 0.00 00 ik 24165 0.00 0.00 0.00 9:00 9,00, 0.00 0.0 15 24133 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 0.00 0 16 24100 9.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 0:00 0.0 0:00 0.00 0.00 0,000.00 0100-26372 17 23.40 ©0100 12-00 2.34 56.42 29,99 29199 26372, a 23103 0.00 19:51 3180-80188 57.22, 57.22 26372Run 1D. H beam +30.625 to 424.5 dnd SLs | Sheet No. Golf vita~shoring | Date: 4-07-2022 H beam +30.625 to +24.50 oMD | Checked : (continued) Stage No.6 Renove strut or anchor no.1 at elevation 28.63 Node ¥ PASSIVE side ~, Ro. coord = Effective stresses — Total soil water vertic Active Passive Earth earth stiffness press. -al limit Limit pressure pressure coeff. ha/m2—Ko/n2— N/m N/K /2 kw/ng— N/m. 19 22.65 0.00 27.02 5.27 108.28 © 48.20 48.20 26372 0.00 27.02 6.62 «84-46 56.00 56.00 © 52743, 20 22.05 0.00 40.28 9.86 118.18 B16 pists 52743, 22 21148 0100 53.81 13.11 145.89 69.38, 93852743 22 20193 5.25 59.89 14.67 160.66 64.07 69.32 36536 23 20140 10150 66.30 16.24 175.51 63.31 73181 36536 24 19180 16.50 73.67 18.05 192.86 66.28 e2170 36536 25 19122 22.35 80.90 19182 209.30 70.89 93124 36836 26 18.63 28.20 68.19 21.61 226.14 75.96 «108.16 36536, Note: _24,38a Soil pressure at active Limit 123/45p Soil pressure at passive LimitNATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division) | Sheet No. Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision Ad4.250.R48 Job No. | p-ai4 Licensed from GEOSOLVE Made by Data filename/aun ID: H beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd sts Golf vita-shoring H bean +30.625 ¢: #24.50. Dap unite: Stage No.6 Remove stutno.t at ele. 2263, Bending manent NLn/m ur) Dissacanet 29 = 004000, até t r | | I ate Eley I 1000 7000 0 Shear fore (kN run} ‘Stage No.6 Remove stutno.1 at elev. 2263 Active pressize (kN /m2) Net pressure kN/n2} 0 200. 0 2000 a Ean) Passive presse (kN/n2}NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division} | Sheet No. Program: WALLA Version 6.05 Revision Add.858.248 1 Job No. | p-414 licensed from GEOSOLVE | Made by 1 i t Data tilename/Run ID: H beam +30.625 to +24.5 dnd sts Golf vita-shoring H beam 130.625 to +24.50 DMD Date: 4-07-2022 Checked + Summary of results " LIME? STATE PARAMETERS Limit State: Serviceability Limit State ALL loads and soil strengths are unfactored STABILITY ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall according to Strength Factor method Factor of safety on soil strength Fos for toe Toe elev. for elev. = 18.63 Fos = 1.500 Steut Factor Moment ‘toe Wall Elev. of equilib. elev. Penetr Safety at elev. ~atio cant. Conditions not suitable for Fos calc. Gant. 2.701 20.02, 23.83 4.30 28.63 Conditions not suitable for Fos calc. 26.63 1.958 n/a 20.68 3.32 No analysis at this stage 25.60 Conditions not suitable for Fos calc.NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division) Program: WALIAP Version 6.05 Revision Ad4.BS8.R48 Data fitenane/Run 1! Golf vita-shoring H beam +30.625 to $24.50 DMD Sunnary of results ‘lcensed from GEOSOLVE H bean $30,625 to +24.5 dnd 8: us nil 8 BENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall ‘Analysia options Soldier Pile width = 0.19m; spacing = 1.50m Passive mobilisation factor = 3.000 Length of wall perpendicular to section = 1000.00n Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesg Influence coefficients Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached Rigid boundaries: Active side 20.00 from wall Passive side 20.00 from wall Limit State: Serviceability Limit state Bending moment, shear force and displacenent envelopes Node ¥ Displacement, Bending monent coord maximum minimum maximum minimis m % etm KN. m/t 30.63 0.038 © 0.000 0.0 “0. 30:31 0.036 0.000 oa -0. 30:00 0.034 + 0.000 17 -0. 29140 0.030 (0.000 af9 <0. 29102 0.027 «0.000 a9i1 a 28.63 0.025 0.000 ail6 a 28113 0.022, 0.000 25.8 _ 27187 0.018 «0.000 2727. 2700 0.015 0.000 ag ai 26.40 0.012, 0.000 75130 51. 26.00 0.010 0.000 964-55. 25.60 0.008 0-000 aziin 5a 25.13 0.007 0.000 e380 a9. 24165 0.006 0.000 sale 37) 24133 0.006 0.000 a2 26. 24700 0.005 0.000 327-12. 23.40 0.004 0.000 27.8 -0. 23:03 0.003 0.000 35.7 “0. 2265 0.002, 0.000 46.2 ° 22.05 0.002 0.000 Sala o. 2148 01001 0.000 4304 ° 20.93 0.001 0.000 2912 °. 20.80 0.001 0.000 i615 o 19:80 0.001_-—0.000 604 ° 19:22 0.001 0-000 13 ° 16.63 0.001 0.000 o10 0. Maximum and minimum bending moment and shear force Stage maximum ka.m/m 1.8 35.0 316 54.4 Bendis elev. 22.05 27.00 28163 22.05 No calculation at this stage ahd 25.60 ing moment. ~ minimum elev. maximum kv -n/m ha/n “a 26.40 2.4 012 23103, 1819 019 23140 36.3 55.2 26.00 48.8 “0.1 30.31, 66.9 sheet No. Job Wo. P-4ld Made by + Date: 4-07-2022 Checked + ia, Shear force m maximum minimum m kw/m ka /ea 0 0.0 0.0 1 215 -014 2 ne -0.9 3 1916 o11 1 28.0 20.8 4 369-44 3 3819-42. 4 ana 33.7 5 71-239 a 48.90 “2201 2 S76 0-142 a 66.9 84.2 3 ie 63.6 3 30.7 50.0, 6 39.20 34.2 4 aed 178 9 45.8 2212 5 35.4 010 ‘0 28 oo 0 17 5.3 0 alo ~24.0 0 lo =25.6 0 lo -20.7 0 010 12.7 0 0.0 5.5 0 0.0 0.0 at each stage elev. minim elev. kam 22.65 Hl 29.49 28.13 -15.3 25.60, 28.63 “17.7 28.63 23.40 48.4 28.63 25.60 84.2 25.60,Run 10. # beam 430.625 to +24.5 aind_SLS | Sheet No. Gols vita-shoring | Date: 4-07-2022 H beam +30.625 to +26.50 DMD | Checked : Summary of results (continued) Maximum and minimum displacement at each stage Stage ~ ~ Displacenent Stage description no. maximum elev. minimum elev. 1 0.001 26.40 0,000 30.63 Lat elev. 30.63 2 0.008 30.63 0.000 30.63 13 on PASSIVE si 3 01007 30.63 0.000 30.63 at elev. 28.63 4 01008 27-00 0.000 30.63 00 on PASSIVE side 5 No calculation at this stage at elev. 25.60 6 0,038 30.63 0.000 30.63 Remove strut no.1 at elev. 28.63 Strut forces at each stage (horizontal components) Stage =~ Strut no. 1 strut no. 2 == 0. at elev. 28.63 at elev. 25.60 fai/m run kN/steut —kN/m run kN/strut 3 54.61 163.83, o 4 66.94 200.82 a 6 ~ 13 151.13NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division} sheet No. Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision Ad4.BS9.248 Job Ko. P-a14 Licensed from GEOSOLVE Made by Data filename/Run ID: H beam 130.625 to +24.5 and s Golf vita-shoring H beam +30.625 to +24.50 DMD Date: 4-07-2022 unite: kN,m Bending moment, shear force, dplacemert envelopes Bending moment kN.r/n un) Disslacerent m) m0 o 2000 0.04000 0 .04900 7 - a a4 “] a Eley. Elev. a | ad 1000) yo00 0 Sheat force (kN/m ran}METHOD STATEMENT & DESIGN OF DOUBLE U BEAMS Date: 04-Jul-22 Ms. No. MSTA ED | Double U Beams /P-414-0 Rev.No 0 3.1.1 DESIGN CRITERIA 3.1.1.1 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION According to our attached calculations, based on available soll investigation report, Double U channels wall shoring system is proposed & is designed for a maximum excavation depth of 6.125 m from existing ground level Using Computer programme, Retaining Wall Analysis, Wallap 3.1.1.2 SURCHARGE LOADS In our design, we have assumed surcharge of 20 KNim2 3.1.1.9 WATER TABLE LEVEL We have considered existing water table level at +20.45 m DMD, inside & outside for our design. 3.1.14 WALL STIFFNESS Proposed Beam Size 2No. - 457 x 191 x67 kgm Moment of inertia of beam along X-X aw (cm4)-Single 29380 Moment of Inertia of beam along X-X axis (em4}-Double 158760 ‘Young Modulus of steel (MNim2) 210000 ‘Spacing of Double U channels Beam (m cfc) 1.50 Rav 0[METHOD STATEMENT & DESIGN OF DOUBLE U BEANS Date: 04-Jul-22 "Ms. No, MSTA/ ED / Double U Beams /P-414-0 Rev.No. 0 Wall Stiffness = Youngs Modulus x Moment of Inertia 0X) ‘Spacing of Double U channels Bearn cy 100 x 100) 150) 82.26 MNim2 34.15 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Parameters considered in Dasian Chosen Beam Section No. -457 x 191 x 67 kgim Section Modulus (Wx) in om*Single : 1296 Section Modulus (Wx) in em* Double : 2592 ‘Spacing of Beam (rn) : 1.50 Length of Beam (m) : 2 Excavation Depth from EGL(mn) : 6.125 Embecment Length (m) : 5875 Maximum Bending Moment (KNm/m) : 421.1 (From Programme) ‘Allowable Stress in Beam (Nimm2) é 180 Allowable Stress in Bear (KN/m2) a 0.18 Based on above, Allowable Section Modulus (Wrequired) = Maximum Bending Moment / Allowable Stress Maximum Bending Moment per Beam 121A 1.55 181.65 KNm Allowable Section Modulus (Wrequired) = 181.65 1009 om® 018 Since Allowable Section Modulus < Section Modulus provided, Hence safe 1009 < 2592 Hence safe Fav 0 ‘Therefore the section of Beam ——_-2No,-457x191x87 kg/m is safe to take the bending moment,METHOD STATENENT & DESIGN OF DOUBLE U BEAMS Date: 04-Juk22 Ms. No. MSTA/ED /Double U Beams /P-414-0 Rev.No. #VALUE! DIMENSIONING OF CONCRETE PANELS FROM 30.625 to 24.6 m Maximum Horizontal Earth Pressure Eah = 28.08 KNim* (From Programme) Maximum Moment = Eah x (spacing)? 28.08 x15x15 8 8 Maximum Moment = 7.9 KNmv m Load Factor = 14 Maximum Moment= 7.9.x 1 11.06 KNew m Proposed Concrete panels of dimensions Thickness in oms. = 10 cms = 100 mm Effective Thickness (4 8 oms= 80 mm Height of concrete panel om Steel Grade fy = 460 Nimm2 Concrete Grade = 30 Nimm2 bh 100/10 ‘Assuming the width of panel (b) a 1.0 m = 1000 rm Mr (bxa" 1.06 x 1000000 473 41000 x 60 x 80 From B.S. 8110-Part 1, 1986 100 As (bx a7 Required As = 0.47 x 1000 60= 376 mm? 100 Proposed : piameter 10 mm @ 150 cle-Horizontal & Vertical along the tension face from 30.625 to 24.6 m Reinforcement provided 628mm? > 376 mm? __ SAFE Rev:METHOD STATEMENT & DESIGN OF DOUBLE U BEANS Date: O4Jul22 Ms. No. NSTA/ED Double U Beans P40 Rev. No 13 ANCHOR DESIGN Spacing of anchor 3.00 Length of anchor 18 Incination of anchor co Diamater of anchor strands 1520 mm Efiecive area of anchor 199 sam Grade of anchor strands 1670 N/sqmmm According to 8.S.8081, table 2, FO 2 Characteristic strength of anchor sta 208 kN Horizontal anchor frce/m = 604 kN Maximum anchor force 245.16 KN Uttimate anchor force = 490.22 No, of Strands / Anchor 490.32 - 28 nos 208 However provided total nos. of strands / anchors Total Nos, of strands : 3 Proposed 3 nos. 0.6" strands steel grade 1670 Nimm2 3.1.92 DESIGN OF GROUT BODY LENGTH Load per anchor = 245.16 KN Satety Factor 3 Urimate anchor load =245.16 x3 73548 KN required gruot length (Lo) = Pu Roxb Nominal amater of strands = 152mm Perimeter (Ao) = cow x aia = 0.08 m Proposed No.of strands = 3 Nos Bond length = imate anchor oad Perimiter of tendon x 1.0.Mn / sqmm Rev. 0[METHOD STATEMENT & DESIGN OF DOUBLE U BEAMS Date: 04-Juk22 Ws, No. MSTA/ED Double U Beams P4140 Rev. No. 31.33 3134 31.35 “The uTivate bond sires ofthe Concrete is taken as TMNT sqm according je ple design and Construction practice by M.J. tomlinson Page no, 217 (Attached), Lo= 0.73548 = §.10741569 m 3x00048 x1 ‘Assume length of grout body = 10 m Provide grout body of 10 m lonath GROUT GROUND INTERACTION Utimate anchor load = 735.48 Kn ‘According to B.S, 8081 - 1989 -FIG 60 Uttimate bond stress for medium dense to very dense sand = 300 Kn/sqm to 800 Kn/sqn Considering the prevailing sol strat 300 Kn//sqm ‘Anchor iamater = 130 rom Ulitmate Bond stress = 0.13x3.14% 10x300= ELASTIC ELONGATION OF ANCHORS Maximum load per anchor = 248.18 KN ‘Assume Total length of the anchor = 18m Elastic elongatio: el xb Where P= 245.16 KN Free length of anchor Young's modulus kn / sqmm No. of strands = 3 Nos. ‘Area of strands 3x 139 417 sqmm Max, etongatio 245.16 x 8x 1000 2352 mm 200% 417 ANCHOR STRESSING > 73648 7 days after post grouting, the anchors shall be stressed and looked off to the required load, after grout compresive strength has achieved 60-70% of the desigin strength. Fav 7H BEAM WALL DESIGN Date: 04-Jul-22 (Ms. No, MSTA / ED / H Beam /P-414 - 0 Rev.No. | 0 344 B44 341.2 344.3 B44 DESIGN CRITERIA TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION According to our attached calculations, based on available soil investigation report, H beam wall shoring system is proposed & is designed for a maximum excavation depth of 6.125 m from existing ground level Using Computer programme: WALLAP Retaining wall design SURCHARGE LOADS In our design, we have assumed surcharge of 20 KNim2 WATER TABLE LEVEL We have considered a water table level at +20.45 m DMD below ground level for our design WALL STIFFNESS Proposed Beam Size: 457 x 191 x 89 kgim Moment of Inertia of beam along X-X axis (cm4) 41020 ‘Young Modulus of steel (MNim2) 210000 ‘Spacing of Beam (m cic) 1.50 Rev,H BEAM WALL DESIGN Date: 04-Jul-22 (Ms, No, MSTA /ED/ H Beam /P-414 -0 Rev.No.| 0 Wall Stiffness = Youngs Modulus x Moment of inertia (X-X) ‘Spacing of Beam Wall Stiffness = 210000 x 41020 Fal 1.50 Wall Stiffness = 87.43 MNim2 3.1.1.5 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Rev. Parameters considered in Design ‘Chosen Beam Section 457 x 191 x 89 kg/m ‘Section Modulus (Wr) in cm® : 170 Spacing of Beam (mn) : 1.50 Length of Beam (m) : 2 Excavation Depth from EGL(m) : 6.125 Embedment Length () : 5875 Maximum Bending Moment (KNevin) : 421.1 From Programme) Allowable Stress in Beam (Nimm2) : 180 Allowable Stress in Beam (KNim2) : 0.18 Based on above, Allowable Section Modulus (Wrequired) = Maximum Bending Moment / Allowable Stress ‘Maximum Bending Moment per Beam = A214 x15" 181.65 KNm Allowable Section Modulus (Wrequired) = 1009 em® Since Allowable Section Modulus < Section Modulus provided, Hence safe 0HBEAM WALL DESIGN Date: 04-Jul-22 Ms, No. MSTA / ED / H Beam / P-414 - 0 Rev.No, | 0 Maximum Shear Force (KNIm) 84.2 (From Programme) Maximum Shear force! beam (Kn) 84.21.55 1263 KN Height of web 487 mmm ‘Thickness of web 105 mm Maximum Shear Stress (126.3x1000)(457 x10.6) 26.32 Nimm2 Allowable shear stress in Beam (Nimm2) 405 Nimm2 ‘Since allowable shear stress > maximum shear stress, safe ‘Therefore the section of Beam 457 x 191 x89 ka/m is safe to take the BM& S.F. 3.1.1.6 DIMENSIONING OF CONCRETE PANELS Maximum Horizontal Earth Pressure Eah = 28.08 KNim? Maximum Moment = Eah x (spacing) 28.08 x 1.5 x15 8 8 Maximum Moment = 7.9 KNm/ m Load Factor = 14 Maximum Moment= — 7.9x1.4= 11.08 KNm/m Proposed Concrete panels of dimensions Thickness in ems. = 10 cms 100 mm, Effective Thickness (d)= Boms= 80 mm Height of concrete panel = 1.0 m Steel Grade fy = 460 Nimm2 Conerete Grade = 30 Nimm2 bih= 100/10 ‘Assuming the width of panel (b) as 1.0 m= 1000 mm (From Programme)H BEAM WALL DESIGN Date: 04-Jul-22 Ms. No, MSTA / ED H Beam /-414 -0 Rev.No. | 0 MI(exa)= 11.06 x 100000 173 11000 x 80 x 80, From B.S. 8110-Part 1, 1985 100 As/ (bx) = 0.47 Required As = 0.47 x 1000 x & 376 mm2 100 Proposed : Diameter 10 mm @ 180 c/c-Horizontal & Vertical Reinforcement provided 628mm? > 376 mom? SAFE Rev: 0DUC WALL Date: | 19-Feb-20 Ws, No, MSTA/ED/ DUG WALL P-404-01 a) 314 JALLING \M DESIGN ‘The uniform horizontal load acting on waling beam is w 659 Kn/mt 67__Kn/me. feb 30 30 Max Moment Mb= 66.94 x33. 75.31 KN m 3 Max. Shear Force b= 66.94x3 100.41 KN m 2 Proposed 2 nos. U BEAMS of size 206 x 102 x46 ‘Section Modulus Ixx = 2x 8208= 16416 cm* Elastic Modulus Wxx = 2x 539= 1078 = cm* Steel grade" 275 Nisqmm Stfiness of wailing beam E = 210000 MNisqm E x bex= 0,00016446 x 210000 = 34.47 MNisqm Max. Bending Stress = M/W = 75,3078 x 1000 1078 = 68.86 | Nisqmm = << 180 N/sqmnm (Allowable safe) HENCE SAFE Max. Shear Stress . 400.41 x10 2x[30.5-2% 1.48] = 4021 Nisam =< 105 N/sqmm (Allowable safe) HENCE SAFE Thus Provide 2 nos. U Beam of size 305 x 102 x 46 kg/m bback to back with a gap in between to accommodate the anchor strands. The walling beam to be fixed to the H beam wall with the help of welded angle plates, Stiffners shall be provided to avoid bending of flanges at the anchor location.Method Statement & Design of Temp, Retaining Wall Dater04-07-2022 Mss. No, MST & DESIGN/ED/Temp. RWIP-414 Tssue -07- Rev. No.0 3.2 Rev. 0 WALLAP ANALYSIS — ULS DA1 COMBINATION 2 P44NATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division} | Sheet to. Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision Ad4.B58.R48 1 Job No. | e-a14 Licensed from GEOSOLVE I Made by : Data filename/Run ID: H beam #30.625 to +24.5 dnd_ULS2 1 GOLF VITA — shoring | pate: 4-07-2022 | Checked : H beam #30.625 to #24.50 unite: AN,m INPUT DATA SOTL PROFILE Stratum Elevation of = ~ Soil types - no. top of stratum Active side Passive side 1 30.63 1 dense sand 1 dense sand 2 24165 2 Very dense sand 2 Very dense sand 3 22.65 3. sandstone 3. sandstone SOIL PROPERTIES (Unfactored SLS soil strengths) Bulk Young's At rest Consol Active Passive == Soil type -- density Modulus coeff. state. limit Limit Cohesion No. Description kN/m3 Eh, kN/m2 Ko. NC/OC| Ka kp ka/m2 (oatun elev.) (aEh/dy ) (dko/ay) ( Na} ( Kac) ¢ Kpe } ( de/dy ) 1 dense sand 18,002 38000 0,398 «= OC_=0.214 7.034 20.80 (0.300) (0-000) ¢ 0.000) 2 very dense 20.00a $0000«0,371-0c_=195 8.208 sand 22:00 (@.300) (0-000) ¢ 0.000) 3 Sandstone 22/00 100000 0.440 OC. 024551675 (0.300) (0-000) ¢ 0.000) Note: (a) and (b) are Bulk Densities above and below the water table Additional soil parameters ooiated with Ka and Kp “== parameters for Ka --= parameters for Kp soil Wall Back= Soil. Wall Back- Soil type friction adhesion fill friction adhesion f211 No. Deseription ‘angle coeff. angle angle coeff. angle 1) dense sand 37.00 0.500 0.00 37.00 0.500 0.00 2 Very dense sand 39100 01500 0.00 39:00 0.500 9.00 3 sandstone 34100 0.800 0.00 © «34.00 0.500 0.00 GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Density of water = 10.00 kN/m3 Active side Passive side Initial water table elevation 21.45, 21.45 Automatic water pressure balancing at tee of wall : No WALL PROPERTIES ‘Type of structure = Soldier Pile Wall Soldier Pile width = 0.19 Soldier Pile spacing = 1.50 n Pagsive mobilisation factor = 3.00 Elevation of toe of wall = 18.63 Maximum Finite element length = 0.60 = Young modulus of wall E = 2.10008+08 kw/n2 Moment of inertia of wall I = 2.73478-04 mi/m run B.1 = 57428 kM.m2/m run Yield Moment of wall = Not defined STRUTS and ANCHORS strut/ x-section Inclin Pre- anchor strut area Youngs Free ation stress Tension no. Elev. spacing of strut modulus length (degs) /strut allowed ® sq.m kN/n2 on i 1 28.63 3.00 0.000695 2.000408 10.00 35,00 200.0 No. 2 25160 170012000000 20008407 10.00 0.00 0 NoSURCHARGE LOADS Surch Distance length width Surcharge Equiv. Partial warge from parallel perpen. ka/m2 - soil’ factor/ no. Elev. wall to wall to wall’ Near edge Far edge type Category 1 30.63 0.30(a) 50.00 30.00 20.00 = N/A 1.00 = Note: A= Active side, P = Passive side Limit state Categories 2/U = Permanent Unfavourable P/F = Permanent Eavourable Var = Variable (unfavourable) ‘CONSTRUCTION STAGES Construction Stage description stage no. = 1 apply Surcharge 0.1 at elevation 30.63 2 Excavate to elevation 28.13 on PASSIVE side 3 Ietall strut ox anchor no-1 at elevation 28.63 4 Excavate to elevation 24.00 on PASSIVE e:de 5 Install strut or anchor no.2 at elevation 25.60 6 Remove strut or anchor no.1 at elevation 28.63 FACTORS OF SAFETY and ANALYSIS OPTIONS Limit State options: DLS DAL Combination 2 Water pressures : Worst Credible Partial factor on ct Partial factor on Phi* Partial factor on Cu Partial factor on Partial factor on Partial factor on Partial factor on Stability analysis: Method of analysis — soil Modulus Permanent Unfavourable loads = 1.000 Permanent Favourable Loads Permanent Variable loads = 1.250 11250 = 12400 2/000 1000 ila00 Strength Factor method Overall factor on soil strength for calculating wall depth = 1.00 Paranetere for undrained strata: Minimum equivalent fluid density = Maximum depth of water filled tension crack = Bending moment and displacement Method - Subgrade reaction Open Tension Crack analysis? Non-linear Modulus Parameter Boundary conditions: Length of wall (normal to plane of analysis) = Width of excavation on active Width of excavation on passive side of wall Distance to rigid boundary on active side = Distance to rigid boundary on passive side ‘ouneur oprroxs 5.00 N/m 0.00 m calculation model using Influence Coefficients = Wo (1) = 10.00 m 1000.00 m side of wall = 20.00 m = 20100 m 20.00 m 20.00 m stage Stage description ~ - Output options ~ 0. Displacement Active, Graph. Bending mom, Passive output Shear force’ pressures 1 Apply surcharge no.1 at elev. 30.63 Yes Yes Yes 2 Excav. to elev. 28.13 on PASSIVE aide No No No 3 Install strut no.1 at elev. 28.69 No No No 4 Excav. to elev. 24.00 on PASSIVE aide Yea yes Yes 5 Install strut ao.2 at elev. 25.60 No No No © Rorove strut no.1 at elev. 28.63 xes yes Yes, * Sunmary output yes - yes Program WALLAP ~ Copyright (€) 2012 by DL Borin, 69 Rodenhurst Road, London sw4, UK. distributed by GEOsoLVvE ‘Pel: +44 20 8674 7251NATIONAL ENGINEERING Program: WALLAP Ve1 bata filenane/aun GOLF VITA ~ shoring A beam #30.625 to +24.50 CONTRACTING (Piling D: on 6.05 Revision Ad4.05: Licensed from GEOSOLVE H beam 130.625 to 424.5 dnd_v1s? RAB unite: StageNo2 Excay. to elev. 2813 on PASSIVE side SUQLUUIMIIIVLIIUL, dence cand Vey dense sand dense sand Very dense sand Sheet No. Job tio, eal Made by + Date: 4-07-2022 checked + kvm 3063 2013 2465 22.65 ‘andstone a ‘Water preseue (KN/n2} EyNATIONAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING (Piling Division) Program: WALLAP Version 6.05 Revision A44.858.R48 bata £ilename/aun 1 GOLF VITA ~ shoring H beam +30.625 to +24.50 Stage No. 2 STABILITY ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall according to Strength Sheet No. Job No. H beam 130.625 to +24.5 dnd ULS2 Factor of safety on soil strength 2 30.63 28.13 overall Fos for toe elev. = 18.63 cant. Factor Moment of equilib, Safety at elev. 2.161 20.02 ean bate: 4-07-2022 IL 1 Licensed from GBOSOLVE | Made by Il i 1 Checked + units: kX, Excavate to elevation 28.13 on PASSIVE side oe elev. for Fos = 1.000 Toe wall elev. Ponetr sation 24.03 3.30 ENDING MOMENT and DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS of Soldier Pile Wall Analysis options Soldier Pile width = 0.19m; Passive mobilisation factor = 3.000 Length of wall perpendicular to section = 1000.00n Subgrade reaction model - Boussinesg Influence coefficients Soil deformations are elastic until the active or passive limit is reached Rigid boundaries: Node ¥ no. coord 1 30.63 2 30.31 3 30.00 & 29.40 5 29.02 6 28.63 7 28113 8 27.87 9 27100 10 26.40 11 26.00 12 25.60 13 25113 1a 24.65 1s 24.33 16 24.00 723.40 18 23.03, 19 22165 20 22.05 212145 22 20.93 23 20.40 24 19.80 25 19.22 26 18.63 nett pressure kw/n2 0.00, 2.73, 5188 10133 12:72 24198 amen -10193 =28 181 730.56 -19107 10152 =1200 Tag 0.97 5180 8.99 12102 i2l87 13735 -1125 -0137 0.03 o.1g 0.27 0.33 0136 0138 spacing = 1.50 Active side 20.00 from wall Passive side 20-00 from wall Limit State: ULS DAL Combination 2 wad disp. 0.015 o.o1a o.013 o.o11 o.o10 a.oaa (007 05, 04 003 S002 002 oot 01 oor Zoot Soot Soot oot 001 01 000 ‘000 "000 000 000 000 000 wall rotation rad. 3.27803 3278-03 31278-03 3258-03 1228-03, li6e-03 ‘o2e-03, t738-03, 1308-03 "158-03, 388-03 Toae-03, ‘o3e-04 T462-04 468-04 h16e-04 218-04 ‘6e-04 Te9E-05, [21B-05, T17e-05, 476-05 028-05 [s2e-06 [1sE-06 Shear Bending force moment ki/m KM /m 0.0 0. 0. 2. strut Forces N/m Factor method