Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
such as instruction for the teaching of children. It is an institution for specialized higher education
higher learning that provides teaching and research facilities and is allowed to award academic
degrees. It consists of an undergraduate division that awards bachelor's degrees and a graduate
division that includes a graduate school and professional schools that award master's and doctorate
degrees.
With regards to colleges and universities, parents do send their children to school for the
following reason;
Jose Rizal Memorial State University is the premiere university in the Province of
Zamboanga del Norte with campuses and extensions in Dapitan City (Main), Dipolog Campus,
2. In the southern Philippines, there is a dynamic, inclusive, and regionally varied university.
3. "Panglantaw: Usa ka unibersidad nga giila sa kalibutan nga aktibo sa kausaban ug lahi sa uban."
and "Panglantaw: Usa ka unibersidad nga giila sa kalibutan nga aktibo sa kausaban ug lah
3. "Tahas: Ang Jose Rizal Memorial State University nanumpa nga mopadangat sa
4. Ang tumong sa pag-umol ug mga tawo nga adunay igong katakus, bag-o ug may
kinaugalingon nga kausaban ang pagpasalig kini sa paghatag ug abante nga propesyonal, teknikal
Parents do send their children to school in order for them to learn. They send their children
to colleges and universities for higher educational training for a variety of reasons, including peace
and order. Thus, they choose to send their children to universities where they believe learners will
Crimes can be classified in various ways. Crimes also can be grouped by subject matter.
For example, a crime like assault, battery, or rape tends to injure another person’s body, so it can
be classified as a “crime against the person.” If a crime tends to injure a person by depriving him
These classifications are basically for convenience and are not imperative to the study of criminal
law.
More important and substantive is the classification of crimes according to the severity of
punishment. This is called grading. Crimes are generally graded into four
intent element affects a crime’s grading. Murder, for example, are evil in their nature and are
generally graded higher than malum prohibitum crimes, which are regulatory, like a failure to pay
income taxes.
The most serious crimes are felonies. They are either motivated by a terrible goal, such as
the desire to kill, or they are accompanied by a grave consequence, such as death, major damage,
felony conviction also include the inability to vote, own a weapon, or even participate in certain
careers.
Misdemeanors are less serious than felonies, either because the intent requirement is of a
lower level or because the result is less extreme. It is usually punishable by jail time of one year
community service.
Felony-misdemeanors are crimes that the government can prosecute and punish as either a
The discretion whether to prosecute the crime as a felony or misdemeanor usually belongs to
the judge, but in some instances the prosecutor can make the decision.
Infractions, often known as violations, are the least serious crimes and include minor
offenses like jaywalking and traffic offences that result in a simple traffic ticket. Fines or
alternative penalties, such as traffic school, are usually imposed for infractions.
Despite the university's existing rules and regulations to prevent crime from happening,
violations continue to occur inside the campus in a subtle manner, and victims are sometimes
unaware of the crime because they believe it is not a significant transgression. Thus, it is with
utmost desire of the researcher to pursue this study on most common crimes inside the campus as
Theoretical Framework
The existence of crime may be traced back to the dawn of human civilisation. When it
comes to criminology, it has developed over time and continues to develop. A theory is an
investigation into the psychological motivations that drive someone to engage in criminal action.
There are a variety of alternative criminal behavior theories. Different ideas examine how a crime
was committed from various perspectives. Some views even claim that society is to blame for all
1. Classical or Traditional Theory. It is the most classical or traditional of all the theories of
criminal behavior, as the name implies. Cesare Beccaria, an Italian criminologist, came up with
this theory. Crime, according to Classical thought, arises when the danger outweighs the gain.
This notion is more akin to a risk-to-reward ratio that favors reward. Simply put, crime
occurs when the value of the reward exceeds the value of the danger involved. According to this
theory, committing a crime is a personal decision. Thus, if the crime is committed voluntarily, it
is done for personal gain and selfishness. Classical theory combines the reward and risk ratios, as
is undertaken voluntarily, strain theory contends that social circumstances have a significant part
in every crime committed. In the 1930s, an American sociologist named Robert King Merton
Later on, two other sociologists from America, Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin, contributed to
this theory. A variety of factors are thought to play a role in the prevalence of crime. Failure, a loss
of social dignity, inequality, unequal wealth distribution, and a variety of other social issues are
sociologists and criminologists under this paradigm. In this section, he discusses the importance
3. Social control or Power control theory: The right governance leads to less crime.
This hypothesis was created by John Hagan, a professor at Northwestern University. His
teaching specialization is law and sociology. Gender is a major issue on the table, according to his
theory. This might also be considered one of the most current criminal behavior hypotheses. The
evolution and inputs of the power control theory are still present. Another part of this argument is
that society, which includes people of all genders, is accountable for crime prevention. This idea
also claims that if there were no governance or legal authorities, criminal activity would be at its
peak.
routine is one of the primary components of the routine activity theory. Other essential components
include achieving a desire through crime and less effective deterrents or rules.
According to this view, crime is sparked by a 'desire' that arises from a disruption in routine.
Because humans cannot cope with the break in habit, they resort to immoral behavior. When the
authority in power fails to effectively control exposure to new circumstances, a crime occurs. This
theory was discovered by Lawrence E. Cohen and Marcus Felson. Their explanation was from the
This viewpoint contends that democracy, while useful, is also unbalanced. For example,
according to this notion, the number of persons who formulate, enforce, and protect laws is fairly
small. On the other hand, the people who are required to follow those laws are far more numerous.
As a result, crime exists because those who commit criminal actions do not struggle with
the law, but rather with the legislators. Jürgen Habermas, a German sociologist and philosopher,
coined the term "critical theory." The logic underpinning critical theory is that capitalism creates
an environment that gives powerful people an edge. It is easier for persons with power to commit
This idea has some similarities to classical theory and dates back to the 18th century.
Experts in the field of chronology, on the other hand, consider that rational choice is a
continuation of classical theory. To put it another way, the rational choice theory rationalizes
crime.
This theory, like the classical theory, takes into account the risk and reward factors.
Further, according to this view, time is a significant component in the occurrence of crime. For
example, if the penalty for a crime is applied at a later date, the crime is less dangerous. The
penalty, on the other hand, would appear to be more deserving if it were implemented promptly.
In comparison to other theories of criminal conduct, this one is fairly basic. As the name
of the theory implies, social disorganization is all about crime in disorganized towns or cities. It is
fair to argue that the social disorganization theory arose as a result of this process.
rational, power, and social control theories can be seen in its explanation. This hypothesis
maintains that if no preventative measures are done, crime will continue to increase.
Public executions were carried out during the eighteenth century. The goal was to instill
terror in people that they would be publicly punished. Fear served as a warning to people about
their behavior. However, as time went on, the concepts of punishment for criminal actions
continued to alter.
The positivity theory arose as a result of an external factor's evolution. Cesare Lombroso
is a well-known criminologist who believes in this notion. He was the one who went for the
criminal's bodily perception. Lombroso pioneered the idea of discriminating between distinct types
of offenders. That is how the terms criminal by birth and criminaloid were coined.
This hypothesis states that when a person is classified as a criminal, his or her chances of
engaging in criminal activity increase. In other words, if a person is penalized for a crime and
hence identified as a criminal, he becomes even worse. The entire perspective alters to feel that
10. Life Course Theory: Events from lives shapes the crime
This theory is based on a criminal's life events. There are two primary events in this theory,
namely trajectory and transitory. Events produce a stepping stone that leads to crime, where
It is vital to understand the causes of crime in order to comprehend crime. Nobody is born
The ten theories of criminal behavior listed above explain why people commit crimes.
Conceptual Framework
Unlike torts, crime is not just a wrong against an individual but is also a wrong committed
against the society or a public wrong and includes acts like murder, rape and theft to mention a
few. It is not a case of differences between two parties but is a case between the wrongdoer and
the state. The definition of the concept of crime is important; of course, because of the types of
questions it directs attention to and the order of phenomena it leads one to investigate. A definition
of crime establishes the subject matter of the discipline of criminology and sets limits on what is
if an appropriately humanistic definition of crime is used as its initial point of departure. The most
commonly accepted definition of crime is ‘an act that is capable of being followed by criminal
proceedings’, which provides us with a wide classification of the term in that the only common
may also include any action or omission which causes harm to person or property or in any way
violates the criminal law. The concept of crime often, but not necessarily, involves violation of
moral codes followed by some level of social disapproval but is it important to recognize that not
the ways crime can be defined, although each demonstrates noticeable difficulties associated with
defining the concept of crime. The first of these is crime as a social construction; this poses a
difficulty for creating a general definition of crime as it varies across cultures. The second
framework is crime as defined by religious doctrine or authority; within this context there is both
a conflict between what would be considered a crime by society and religion but also between
religions themselves. Although less prominent in modern day society, a crime can be defined as
an action that goes against the law of God. Sharia Law in Middle East is one such example. In
Saudi Arabia, even in this day and age, a woman driving is a crime and even though this law is
absurd, that is the law. Honor killings and domestic abuse are examples of behavior, which may
be sanctioned within a particular religion but would disagree with basic state law, most commonly
in westernized societies.
Crime can also be understood as a reflection of the law of a particular nation-state; an act
can only be defined as criminal in accordance to the laws of the state in which it was committed.
This creates a difficulty in defining crime as what may be considered a criminal action in one state
Finally, more recently, concepts of crime have emerged that are formed beyond the
constraints of specific nation-state laws from general social and political theory. In most western
societies, crime is of individualistic responsibility and so places blame on individuals rather than
the systems they are contained within. However, by viewing crime in relation to social and political
theory it is possible to look at the causes of a person’s behavior, which may render them
irresponsible for their actions, and also to define actions as crimes, which may not be considered
so within the society itself. For example, during the reign of Hitler in Nazi Germany, the systematic
slaughter of the Jewish race was not considered criminal; however, when viewed in retrospect, the
the time, it is widely agreed that the Holocaust was criminal, however, when it came to trial, only
a small number of officers were named as personally responsible. This is because it was decided
that many of those involved could not be charged as they were simply following the instructions
issued to them by their superiors and so did not willingly commit the crimes. Here we can see
another difficulty emerging which affects the definition of crime, which goes beyond the action
In conclusion, looking at the above 4 frameworks and examples of Saudi Arabia, Honor
Killings, Domestic Abuse and the Holocaust, we understand that the content of crime changes
along with time and the changing needs of the society. Not only that, it changes from society to
society. In India, a woman driving is something that is not frowned upon whereas; in Saudi Arabia
women driving is a crime. Even within the country of India we can see laws changing from state
to state for example selling liquor in Maharashtra is legal whereas is a crime in Gujarat. Kerela has
no restrictions on cow slaughter but cow slaughter in Andhra Pradesh and Telengana is a crime.
Overall, it can be argued that no action in itself is criminal; it is the consequences that
follow which define it as being so. An act cannot be classed, as a crime until the offender is caught
and punished, in the absence of a public authority to do so, there is no crime. From this we can see
that there exist great difficulties associated with defining the concept of crime ranging from social
and historical context to individual and personal circumstances. It is unlikely that a general
definition of crime that would satisfy all possible elements of crime in all environments is
reachable and so it is important to take into account such specific details when attempting to create
a more specific, socially and historically bound definition of what constitutes a crime. Thus, there
cannot be a scientific definition of crime and only its content can be described.
Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the study. As shown, Common crimes happens
inside the school campus, Jose Rizal Memorial State University ad these crimes are directed to
Basis for Crime Prevention Program within the university. This looks like a cycle of events and
This study aims to find out the Most Common Crimes Inside the School Campus as Basis
2. Which among the common crime is most prevalent and least prevalent?
3. What are the existing rules and regulations inside the school campus?
4. What can be proposed to mitigate the common crimes inside the school campus as basis
The findings of the study can be utilized by different sectors, especially fishery sectors in
Philippine National Police (PNP). Results of this study will help Police Officers to
formulate sustainable programs on crime prevention especially most common crimes occurring in
the city.
Guidance Councilor. Findings of this study will help guidance councilor inside the school
campuses in ratifying their existing school rules and regulations in order to maintain peace and
School Administrators. Through this study, administrators will be able to collaborate with
other school personnel and/or staff and come up with simple attainable planning to prevent crime
Supreme Student Government. Findings of this research will help SSG officers together
with SSG adviser to propose intervention to students in order for them to enjoy eventually make
Future Researchers. The findings of this study will serve as reference to those who will
attempt to study related to most common crimes inside the school campus.
Scope and Delimitations
This study is limited itself on the current most common crimes inside the school campus
of Jose Rizal Memorial State University Dapitan City for the year 2021-2022.
Definition of Terms
Crimes. It refers to an action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted
Offense. In this study, it pertains to a violation committed by the students against school
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents and discusses the methodology of the study which includes the
methods used, research environment, respondents of the study, research tool, data gathering
Methods Used
A survey shall be employed for exploring the most common crimes inside Jose Rizal
Research Locale
This study will be conducted at Jose Rizal Memorial State University, Dapitan City, Main
Campus.
The main instrument of this study will be questionnaires made by the researcher in order
to explore the most common crime inside the school campus of Jose Rizal Memorial State
University, Dapitan City. The questionnaire is composed only of two parts. First part comprises
the personal information of the respondents, second part composed of questions relating to crimes
Data Analysis
References:
4. http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/2456/Concept-of-
Crime.html#:~:text=The%20Concept%20of%20Crime%20Unlike%20torts%2C%20crime%
10, 2022
5. The current investigation used data from “The Campus Safety and Security Data” webpage