1. The arresting officer affirms that he was designated as the arresting officer during the alleged incident on February 6, 2022 involving PP vs. Riquez.
2. The officer executed an affidavit regarding the incident but does not have any written proof of his designation as arresting officer or authorization from COMELEC to conduct the checkpoint.
3. The officer's affidavit relies on unverified information from unnamed intelligence operatives and an anonymous text message, but he has no proof of these communications or their contents.
1. The arresting officer affirms that he was designated as the arresting officer during the alleged incident on February 6, 2022 involving PP vs. Riquez.
2. The officer executed an affidavit regarding the incident but does not have any written proof of his designation as arresting officer or authorization from COMELEC to conduct the checkpoint.
3. The officer's affidavit relies on unverified information from unnamed intelligence operatives and an anonymous text message, but he has no proof of these communications or their contents.
1. The arresting officer affirms that he was designated as the arresting officer during the alleged incident on February 6, 2022 involving PP vs. Riquez.
2. The officer executed an affidavit regarding the incident but does not have any written proof of his designation as arresting officer or authorization from COMELEC to conduct the checkpoint.
3. The officer's affidavit relies on unverified information from unnamed intelligence operatives and an anonymous text message, but he has no proof of these communications or their contents.
personal knowledge or information as to Arresting Officer Addatu the veracity of such information, correct? 16. Now, based from the report given, would 1. Your participation in this case is that you are you agree with me that the only description the Arresting Officer during the alleged given is that the male person was wearing incident on February 6, 2022, do you still pink short pants with sling bag, correct? affirm that? 17. And that was your only basis for the arrest 2. In fact, you executed an Affidavit to that and search, correct? effect, correct? 18. You also mentioned in your affidavit 3. Who designated you to be the Arresting particularly Par. 4 that your COP instructed Officer that time? you to restrict all vehicles passing through 4. When was this designation of you as the the checkpoint after he received a call from Arresting Officer happened? your Intelligence Operatives informing him 5. Do you have any written proof of such that the validation was true and the designation? aforementioned male person was already 6. I am showing you an affidavit of an Arresting boarded in a Red Euro 150 motorcycle Officer previously marked as Exhibit ____ for traversing towards Brgy. San Jose, do you the prosecution, is this the affidavit you still affirm that? mentioned you executed? 19. Where you around during that time when 7. Now, you mentioned Mr. Witness in you your Intelligence Operatives called? affidavit, particularly Par. 2 that at about 20. Can you please tell us the names of your 9:00AM of February 6, 2022, you together Intelligence Operatives? with other personnel of Baggao PS led by 21. Now, do you any proof of this actual PMAJ GIL Pagulayan Jr. COP was manning a conversation that you mentioned, between COMELEC checkpoint in Sitio Atananggenet, your COP and your Intelligence Operatives? Bitag Grande, Baggao, Cag., do you still 22. So aside from the bare allegation, you affirm that? cannot show us any proof to prove this, 8. Do you have a Memorandum or any order correct? coming from the COMELEC authorizing you 23. That is despite of the fact that you have an to conduct COMELEC checkpoint at Sitio assigned videographer at that time, correct? Atananggenet, Bitag Grande, Baggao, Cag. At 24. By the way, what time was this when your that time? Proof? Intelligence Operatives called? 9. You also mentioned in your affidavit 25. You also mentioned in your affidavit particularly Par. 3 that your COP informed particularly Par. 5 that while manning the you about the text message from an checkpoint, you saw an approaching red unidentified sender in your Hotline Number single motorcycle driven by a male person informing that he saw a male person with the description of the unknown wearing black sweat shirt and pink short informant prompted you to signaled your pants with sling bag showed his firearm to hands as to stop him however, the suspect his fellow customer thereat, do you still suddenly swerved and evaded the affirm that? checkpoint but you were able to stop him, 10. Were you around during that time when do you still affirm that? your COP received this text message? 26. Now, can you show us any proof Mr. 11. What time was this wwhen your COP Witness of your allegation that the suspect received this text message? suddenly swerved and evaded the 12. Do you personally know the sender of the checkpoint? text message? 27. That is despite of the fact that Officer 13. So, you relied merely on the information Aprille Monique Ballena was designated as supplied by this person, correct? the videographer, correct? 14. You believed this person immediately, 28. You also mentioned in your affidavit correct? Particularly Par. 6 that upon checking the suspect, you and your companions were able to see the protruding handle grip of a firearm from his unzipped sling bag that prompted you to immediately freezed the accused, do you still affirm that? 29. And you would agree with me Mr. Witness that again you do not have a video of this particular incident, correct? 30. That is despite of the fact that your team were given all opportunities to take a video, correct? 31. So you want us to believe, you want to impress this HC that during that time the bag was unzipped and that handle grip of the alleged firearm protrude? 32. Knowing that the accused will pass through a COMELEC checkpoint, correct? 33. And after that, did you immediately conduct your inventory and making of the pieces of evidence? 34. And what time was this Mr. Witness when you conducted the inventory?