Christopher-Alan:Hauser,

Beneficiary
1234 Street name
City, State 12345
Without Prejudice

March 1, 2022

Jamie Dimon c/o Chase Cardmember

Services, Headquarters
383 Madison Ave,
New York, NY 10017

RE: (Credit Card Account Number Here)

Registered Mail, Certified Return Receipt Number:

Dear Mr. Dimon:

Over the years, I have been receiving these statements from

your corporation addressed to my all-caps cestui que trust name
CHRISTOPHER HAUSER. Your statement includes a bond
with a coupon attached to it. I have only recently realized what
these words mean. Please see the definitions below from my
Blacks Law Dictionary, 3rd Edition.

Statement - Blacks Law Dictionary 3rd Edition: “An allegation”

Coupon - Blacks Law Dictionary 3rd Edition: “Coupons are

written contracts for the payment of a definite sum of money on
a given day, and being drawn and executed in a form and mode
for the purpose, that they may be separated from the bonds and
other instruments to which they are usually attached...”

Bond - Blacks Law Dictionary 3rd Edition: “A contract by

specialty to pay a certain sum of money”
Instrument - Blacks Law Dictionary 3rd Edition: “A written
document; a formal or legal document in writing, such as a
contract, deed, will, bond, or lease”
Now, it has come to my attention that your corporation has been
sending me these statements all these years with coupons
attached to them and I have been sending checks and/or paying
by electronic funds transfer. The cestui que trust,
CHRISTOPHER HAUSER, was set up to pay all of my bills.
And because you have my social security number, what is
taking place is a Trust Action - with me as the beneficiary and
with Chase as the trustee. As the trustee, I would like to remind
you that you, the authorized representative of Chase has the
fiduciary obligation to act in a way that will benefit me, the
beneficiary. However, that has not been what has been
happening. What has been happening, is that your corporation is
cashing my personal checks/accepting my electronic funds
transfers as payment while also redeeming the coupon which is
double dipping and a crime! This is malfeasance and is trust
fraud! You have my social security number. You are redeeming
the bond and cashing the check/ accepting electronic transfer. I
am now aware of this illegal activity that your

corporation is committing, but I am willing to overlook this

crime, and make you an offer. I request that you, the trustee,
accept my signed coupon, as my offer of tender of payment in
full accord and satisfaction - without recourse from my trust
directly.

I, the beneficiary, also request that Chase, trustee, keep this

credit line open for me to use while continuing to accept my
signed coupon as payment this time and going forward. This
offer is considered accepted at the time the acceptance is
communicated by mail via the Mail Box Rule - see below:

Mail Box Rule:

The posting rule (or mailbox rule in the United States, also known as
the "postal rule" or "deposited acceptance rule") is an exception to
the general rule of contract law in common law countries that
acceptance of an offer takes place when communicated. Under the
posting rule, that acceptance takes effect when a letter is posted (that
is, dropped in a post box or handed to a postal worker).[1] In plain
English, the "meeting of the minds" necessary to contract formation
occurs at the exact moment word of acceptance is sent via post by the
person accepting it, rather than when that acceptance is received by
the person who offered the contract.

The rules of contracts by post (postal rules) include the following:

An offer made by post/letter is not effective until received by the

offeree.

Acceptance is effective as soon as it is posted.

For revocation to be effective, it must be received by the offeree

before they post their letter of acceptance.

One rationale given for the rule is that the offeror nominates the post
office as his or her implied agent, and thus receipt of the acceptance
by the post office is regarded as receipt by the offeror. The main effect
of the posting rule is that the risk of acceptance being delivered late or
lost in the post is placed upon the offeror. If the offeror is reluctant to
accept this risk, he can always expressly require actual receipt as a
condition before being legally bound by his offer.

A rule of contract law that says if an offer is made in such a

manner that it would be reasonable to assume that another
person would accept the offer by placing a letter or other
writing in the mail, then acceptance is deemed to have occurred
when the writing was placed in the mail, not when it was
received by the person making the offer. For example, this is
important when a property owner offers, in writing, to sell a
particular property for a specified sum. The potential purchaser
decided to accept the offer and mail the acceptance to the
owner. Before the owner receives the letter, but after it is
mailed, the owner decides to withdraw the offer and takes the
property off the market or increases the price in this example,
the owner cannot do so because the purchaser has already
accepted the offer, it cannot be withdrawn. There is now a
contract there is no longer an offer capable of revocation.
Furthermore, by your acceptance of this letter a contract is
formed between you as the Agent of your Corporation and I as
the below signed, are now in a contractual agreement that you
have agreed to accept this payment as a lawful payment.

Thank you very much for your attention to this manner.

Sincerely,
By: ______________________
By: Christopher-Alan:Hauser, beneficiary All Rights reserved -
Without Prejudice

________________________________
_______________________
Notary Public Date

Void Where Prohibited by Law. My Commission

Expires: _______________