BGC Eve 2 1st Sem AY 22-23

Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

8:00 AM
8:30 AM
9:00 AM
9:30 AM

10:00 AM
10:30 AM

11:00 AM
11:30 AM

12:00 PM
Law 99
6:00 PM Law 109 Law 109 Legal Bibliography
Law 100 Law 100
Criminal Law 1 Criminal Law 1 Banez, Emerson
6:30 PM Rico-Cruz, Gerely Persons and Family Rico-Cruz, Gerely Persons and Family
Relations Relations Hybrid
Online Mawis, Ma. Soledad Online Mawis, Ma. Soledad (1)
7:00 PM (3) (3)
Online Online
7:30 PM (4) (4)
Law 121 Law 121
8:00 PM Constitutional Law 1 Constitutional Law 1
Tamase, Paolo Tamase, Paolo
8:30 PM Emmanuel Emmanuel
None None
9:00 PM (4) (4)
 Sat Sun Law 99 Legal Bibliography - Bañez, Emerson | esbanez@up.edu.ph
Law 115 Law 100 PFR - Mawis, Ma. Soledad | solmawis@gmail.com
Legal History
Rosales-Sto. Domingo, Law 109 Crim 1 - Rico-Cruz, Gerely | gerelyrico@gmail.com
Mary Grace
Hybrid Law 115 Legal History - Rosales-Sto Domingo, Mary Grace | maanne@imaginelaw
(2)
Law 121 Constitution - Tamase, Paolo Emmanuel | pstamase@up.edu.ph

Links:
Block - UP LAW BGC EVE https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1_awmF2k
UP LAW BGC Campus https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WxLX6W
| esbanez@up.edu.ph

co@gmail.com
o, Mary Grace | maanne@imaginelaw.ph ; marygraceannerosales@gmail.com
uel | pstamase@up.edu.ph

e.com/drive/folders/1_awmF2k6-wEf9Q-aia6Hmx681mH7tsC4
e.com/drive/folders/1WxLX6WDH0on__eifDxVEMGS_bUArdeeD
 To do:
Case digest
Case digest
Case digest
Case digest for October 17
Case digest for October 18
Case digest for October 18
Case digest for October 19
Case digest for October 20
Case digest for October 20
Case digest for October 20
Case digest for October 15
Read Module 2
English Diagnostic Exam No. 1
Details
Padilla v. Congress of the Philippines, G.R. No. 231671 (July 25, 2017)
[People v. Salle, G.R. No. 103567 (Dec. 4, 1995).]
[Idanan v. People, G.R. No. 193313 (Mar. 16, 2016)]
People v. Doria, G.R. No. 125299, 22 January 1999
People v De Guzman, GR 185843, March 3, 2010
Sarao v Guevara, 1940, 40 OG 11 Supp 263
United States v. Ampar, 37 Phil. 201 (1917)
Noveras v Noveras, G.R. No. 188289, August 20, 2014
Sakai v Republic, GR 224015, July 23, 2018 [note; Separate Concurring, J. Caguioa]
De la Viña v. Villareal 41 Phil 13
United States v. Kepner, 1 Phil. 519 (1902); 1 Phil. 727 (1903).
Read all readings - The Philippine Legal System
Take the exam to test English skills

Text: Agabin, Chapter 1: Indigenous Legal Culture; Chapter 2: The Advent of Islam.
• Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832).
• Rubi v. Provincial Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil. 660 (1919).
Assigned readings for October 1 • Province of North Cotabato v. Government of the Republic of the Philippines Peace Panel
on Ancestral Domain, 568 SCRA 402 (2008) (main op. and Puno, J., separate op.).
• Justin G. Holbrook, Legal Hybridity in the Philippines: Lessons in Legal Pluralism from
Mindanao and the Sulu Archipelago, 18 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 403 (2009-2010)

> Text: Agabin, Chapter 3: The Rise of the Civil Law System; Chapter 4: Uncivil Law as a
Tool of Spanish Imperialism.
> Ruben F. Balane, The Spanish Antecedents of the Philippine Civil Code, 54 PHIL. L.J. 1
(1979).
> Ma. Lourdes Aranal-Sereno & Roan Libarios, The Interface Between National Land Law
Assigned readings for October 8
and Kalinga Land Law, 58 PHIL. L.J. 420 (1983).
> Cariño v. Insular Government, 8 Phil. 150 (1907).
> Cariño v. Insular Government, 212 U.S. 449 (1909).
> Cruz v. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, 347 SCRA 128 (2000) (main op.
and Puno, J., separate op.)
 Subject Deadline Priority Lvl Status
Law 121 - Constitution Law 1 October 15, Saturday @ 10:00 PM A Done
Law 121 - Constitution Law 1 October 15, Saturday @ 10:00 PM B Done
Law 121 - Constitution Law 1 October 15, Saturday @ 10:00 PM C Done
Law 109 - Criminal Law 1 October 15, Saturday @ 10:00 PM D Done
Law 100 - Persons & Family Relations October 18, Tuesday @ 10:00 PM E Done
Law 100 - Persons & Family Relations October 18, Tuesday @ 10:00 PM F Done
Law 109 - Criminal Law 1 October 18, Tuesday @ 10:00 PM G Done
Law 100 - Persons & Family Relations October 19, Wednesday @ 10:00 PM H Done
Law 100 - Persons & Family Relations October 19, Wednesday @ 10:00 PM I Done
Law 100 - Persons & Family Relations October 19, Wednesday @ 10:00 PM J Done
Law 115 - Legal History October 20, Thursday @ 10:00 PM K Done
Law 99 - Legal Bibliography October 13, Thursday @ 10:00 PM L Pending
Law 99 - Legal Bibliography October 13, Thursday @ 10:00 PM M Pending

Law 115 - Legal History October 13, Thursday @ 10:00 PM N Pending

Law 115 - Legal History October 13, Thursday @ 10:00 PM O Pending

Course: Law 109 - Criminal Law 1
Instructor: Judge Rico-Cruz, Gerely
Email: gerelyrico@gmail.com

3. Prospective
a. Rev. Pen. Code, arts. 1, 21, 22 and 366
b. Rev. Pen. Code, art. 62(5), as amended by R.A. 7659 
sec. 23
c. Civ. Code (1950), art. 4
d. Exec. Order No. 292 (1987), sec. 19
e. Cases:

(i) People v. Ringor, 320 SCRA 342 (1999)

(ii) Inmates of the New Bilibid Prison v. De Lima, G.R. Nos. 212719 & 214637, 25 June 2019
(iii) Gumabon v. Director of Prisons, 37 SCRA 420 (1971)
(v) People v. Canuto Bernal, G.R. No. L-44988, 31 October 1936

D. Construction/Interpretation of Penal Laws

1. Strict construction against the State and liberally in favor of the accused
Const. (1987), art. III, sec. 14(2)
Rules of Court, Rule 133, sec. 2
People v. Garcia, 85 Phil. 651 (1950)
Abarquez v. People, G.R. No. 150762, 20 January 2006

Doctrine of In Dubio Pro Reo and Rule of Lenity

Separate Opinion, J. Corona, People v. Temporada, G.R. No. 173473, 117 December 2008]

In dubio pro reo

Bongalon v. People, G.R. No. 169533, 20 March 2013

Rule of Lenity

“A court, in construing an ambiguous criminal statute that sets out multiple or inconsistent punishments, should resolve
2. Burden of proof in criminal cases and the equipoise rule
Rules of Court, Rule 133, sec. 2
3. Spanish text of the Revised Penal Code prevails over its English transaction
People v. Manaba, 58 Phil. 665 (1933)
4. Retroactive application if favorable to the accused
Rev. Pen. Code, art. 22
5. Prescribed, but undeserved, penalties
Rev. Pen. Code, art. 5, 2nd par.
6. Effects of repeal/amendment of penal law
Exec. Order No. 292 (1987), sec. 21 & 22
a. Tuates v. Bersamin, G.R. No. 138962, 4 October 2002
b. Benedicto v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 125359, 4 September 2001
II. Felonies and Criminal Liability
Rev. Pen. Code, art. 3-10
A. Felonies 
1. Definition/Elements
Rev. Pen. Code, art. 3
a. Act
People v. Gonzales, 183 SCRA 309 (1990)
b. Omission
(i) Rev. Pen. Code, art. 116, 137, 213(2)(b), 224, 234, 27
(ii) People v. Sylvestre and Atienza, 56 Phil. 353 (1931)
c. Punishable by the Revised Penal Code
(i) Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege 
(“There is no crime when there is no law punishing it.”)
 (ii) Rev. Pen. Code, art. 3, 5, 1 par., art. 21
st

2. How committed, intentional and culpable felonies and quasi-offe

Rev. Pen. Code, art. 3, 365
a. Dolo
(i) Elements
(ii) Presumption of intent
United States v. Apostol, 14 Phil. 92 (1909)
United States v. Catolico, 18 Phil. 504 (1911)
Rules of Court, Rule 131, sec. 3(b)
(iii) General and specific intent
People v. Puno, 219 SCRA 85 (1993)
People v. Delim, 396 SCRA 386 (2003)
(iv) Intent and Motive
People v. Temblor, 161 SCRA 623 (1988)
People v. Hassan, 157 SCRA 261 (1988)
(v) Mistake of fact
United States v. Ah Chong, 15 Phil. 488 - 1910
People v. Oanis, 74 Phil. 257 (1943)
b. Culpa
Rev. Pen. Code, art. 3, 205, 208, 217, 224
(i) Rollie Calimutan v. People, G.R. No. 152133, 9 Febru
(ii) People v. Pugay, G.R. No. L-74324, 17 November 19
c. Quasi-offenses
Rev. Pen. Code, art. 365
(i) People v. Faller, 67 Phil. 529 (1939)
(ii) Quizon v. Justice of the Peace, G.R. No. L-6641, 28
(iii) Ivler v. Modesto-San Pedro, G.R. No. 172716, 17 No
3. Classification of felonies according to the gravity
Rev. Pen. Code, art. 7, 9, 25, and 26
Rep. Act No. 10951 (2016), sec. 1 and 2
4. Classification of felonies according to the stage of execution
Rev. Pen. Code, art. 6
onsistent punishments, should resolve the ambiguity in favor of the more lenient punishment.” [See Footnote No. 7 in Diño v. Olivares, G.R. No. 170447, 4 December 2009]

September 2001

213(2)(b), 224, 234, 275(1)

za, 56 Phil. 353 (1931)

s no law punishing it.”)

ar., art. 21
elonies and quasi-offenses

, 14 Phil. 92 (1909)
o, 18 Phil. 504 (1911)
1, sec. 3(b)
RA 85 (1993)
RA 386 (2003)
SCRA 623 (1988)
CRA 261 (1988)
ng, 15 Phil. 488 - 1910
. 257 (1943)

R. No. 152133, 9 February 2006

4324, 17 November 1988

e, G.R. No. L-6641, 28 July 1955

G.R. No. 172716, 17 November 2010

stage of execution
R. No. 170447, 4 December 2009]
Course: Law 121 - Constitution Law 1
Instructor: Sir Tamase, Paolo Emmanuel
Email: pstamase@up.edu.ph

Topics coverage on Monday, September 12

3. Judicial Review
Coordinate Construction and Modalities
DONE Philip Bobbit, Constitutional Law and Interpretation, in A COMPANION TO PHILOSOPHY
OF LAW AND LEGAL THEORY (2nd ed. 2010) (Dennis Patterson, ed.).

3.1. Definition, Origins, and Theoretical Basis

Historical Basis
DONE Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).
PANEL A Angara v. Electoral Commission, G.R. No. 45081 (July 15, 1936).
Theoretical Basis
PANEL A Separation of Powers, CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE 19-27 (Ch. 2).
PANEL A Checks and Balances, CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE 29-31 (Ch. 3).

3.2. Justiciable Questions and Prudential Considerations, In General

Overview
PANEL A CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE 39-45, 60-61 (Ch. 4).
Development of the Political Question Doctrine
PANEL A Avelino v. Cuenco, G.R. No. 2821 (Mar. 4, 1949) (main op.; Moran, C.J., concurring and
dissenting; Perfecto, J., dissenting).
PANEL A Francisco v. House of Representatives, G.R. No. 160261 (Nov. 10, 2003) (main op.;
Puno, J., concurring and dissenting).
PANEL A Corona v. Senate, G.R. No. 200242 (July 17, 2012).
PANEL A Ocampo v. Enriquez, G.R. No. 225973 (Nov. 8, 2016) (main op.; Sereno, C.J., dissenting;
PANEL A Carpio, J., dissenting; Caguioa, J., dissenting).

PANEL A [PACIFICO A. AGABIN, Chapter 11: Judicial Review and the Judicialization of Politics, in
MESTIZO: THE STORY OF THE PHILIPPINE LEGAL SYSTEM (2nd ed., 2016).]
PANEL A [Skarlit C. Labastilla, Dealing with Mutant Judicial Power: The Supreme Court and its
Political Jurisdiction, 84 PHIL. L.J. 2 (2009).]
PANEL A [Dante Gatmaytan, Politicisation and Judicial Accountability in the Philippines, 87 PHIL.
L.J. 21 (2012).]
Prudential Considerations
PANEL A Gios Samar, Inc. v. Department of Transportation and Communications, G.R. No.

3.3. Requisites of Judicial Review

ASSIGNED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE 46-52 (Ch. 4).
ASSIGNED David v. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396 (May 3, 2006).

Specific Issues in Standing

ASSIGNED Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora, G.R. No. 141284, Aug. 15, 2000.
ASSIGNED Resident Marine Mammals of the Protected Seascape Tañon Strait v. Reyes, G.R. No.
180771 (Apr. 21, 2015) (main op., until end of Discussion - Procedural Issues;
Leonen, J., concurring, pt. II).
ASSIGNED Erin L. O'Donnell & Julia Talbot-Jones, Creating Legal Rights for Rivers: Lessons from
Australia, New Zealand, and India, 23(1) ECOLOGY & SOC’Y 7 (2018).

3.4. Effect of Declaration of Unconstitutionality

ASSIGNED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE 53-60 (Ch. 4).

3.5. Constitutional Interpretation

ASSIGNED Nitafan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 78780 (July 23, 1987).
ASSIGNED Francisco v. House of Representatives (excerpt on Judicial Review).
ASSIGNED Manila Prince Hotel v. Government Service Insurance System, G.R. No. 122156 (Feb.
3, 1997).

4. Attributes of State
4.1. Functions and Inherent Powers
PANEL C ISAGANI A. CRUZ & CARLO L. CRUZ, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 80-84 (2015).
PANEL C Agricultural Credit and Cooperative Financing Administration v. Confederation of
Unions in Government Corporations and Offices, G.R. No. 21484 (Nov. 29, 1969

4.2. Immunity from Suit

PANEL C CONST. art. XVI, § 3.
PANEL C The Doctrine of State Immunity, PHIL. POLITICAL LAW 49-86.
4.2.1. Suits Against the State
PANEL C Department of Health v. Phil. Pharmawealth, Inc., G.R. No. 169304 (Mar. 13, 20
4.2.2. Express Consent
a. Money claims arising from contract
PANEL C [See Act No. 3083 (1923) (Defining the Conditions under which the G
be Sued).]
PANEL C [See Commonwealth Act No. 327 (1938) (amended by Pres. Decree N
(Government Auditing Code).]

b. Torts committed by special agents

PANEL C [CIVIL CODE, art. 2180.]
PANEL C [Meritt v. Government of the Philippine Islands, G.R. No. 11154 (Mar.

c. Incorporated government agencies

PANEL C [See, e.g., Rep. Act No. 7875, § 16(g) (1995) (National Health Insuran
PANEL C [See Rep. Act No. 10149, § 3(k), (m), (n), (o) & (p) (2011) (GOCC Go
classification of GOCCs).]

4.2.3. Implied Consent

a. Government submits itself to the court’s jurisdiction
b. The State itself files a complaint
c. Government entering into business contracts; Unincorporated
agencies exercising proprietary functions
PANEL C Air Transportation Office v. David, G.R. No. 159402 (Feb. 23, 2011).
d. When inequitable for government to claim immunity
PANEL C Vigilar v. Aquino, G.R. No. 180388 (Jan. 18, 2011).

4.2.4. Execution
PANEL C Lockheed Detective and Watchman Agency, Inc. v. University of the Philippines,
G.R. No. 185918 (Apr. 18, 2012).
4.2.5. Foreign State Immunity

Case Study: Sovereign-Funded Projects (The North Rail Case)

I-Team Report, Great Train Robbery?, PHIL. DAILY INQUIRER (Oct. 12-14, 2005) (3- part
series) (clippings provided).
PANEL C China National Machinery & Equipment Corp. v. Santamaria, G.R. No. 185572 (Feb.
7, 2012).
 [Aurea Calica, PHL, China Drop North Rail, PHIL. STAR (Sept. 26, 2012),
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2012/09/26/852997/phl-china-drop-
north-rail.]
David Dollar, China and the West Competing Over Infrastructure in Southeast Asia,
BROOKINGS (Apr. 2020), https://www.brookings.edu/research/china-and-
the-west-competing-over-infrastructure-in-southeast-asia/.
[Alvin Camba, Derailing Development: China’s Railway Projects and Financing Coalitions
in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines (Bos. Univ. Glob. Dev’t Pol’y Ctr.,
GCI Working Paper No. 008, Jan. 2020),
https://www.bu.edu/gdp/2020/02/05/derailing-development-chinas-
railway-projects-and-financing-coalitions-in-indonesia-malaysia-and-the-
philippines/.]

B. CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT

5. The Legislative Branch1

CONST. art. VI, §§ 1, 32.
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983) (excerpts).
5.1. Powers of Congress
5.1.1. General and Necessary Powers
Arnault v. Nazareno, G.R. No. L-3820, 87 Phil. 29 (July 18, 1950) (excerpts).
5.1.2. Legislative Power
5.1.2.1. Procedural Limitations - CONST. art. VI, §§ 26-27.
5.1.2.2. Substantive Imitations
A. Express Substantive Limitations
Notable ExNotable Examples:
CONST. art. III (Bill of Rights).
CONST. art. VI, §§ 25, 28 & 29 (Appropriation, Taxation, Disbursement).
CONST. art. VI, § 30 (Nobility).
CONST. art. VI, § 31 (Expansion of Supreme Court Jurisdiction).
B. Implied Substantive Limitations
(1) Prohibition against Delegation of Legislative Powers
a. Scope: Delegated Legislative Power v. Take Care Power (Faithful
Execution)
Biraogo v. Philippine Truth Commission, G.R. No. 192935 (Dec. 7, 2010) (main op.;
Corona, C.J., concurring; Carpio, J., dissenting) (excerpts).

b. Criteria of Valid Delegation

ABAKADA Guro Party List v. Purisima, G.R. No. 166715 (Aug. 14, 2008).
[U.S. v. Ang Tang Ho, G.R. No. 17122 (Feb. 27, 1922).]
c. Undue Delegation of Legislative Power
Pelaez v. Auditor-General, G.R. No. 23825 (Dec. 27, 1965).
d. Proper Delegation
i. By Express Authority of the Constitution
CONST. art. VI, § 28(2) (Tariff Powers).
CONST. art. VI, § 23(2) (Emergency Powers).
CONST. art. VI, § 25(5) (Transfer of Appropriations).
Garcia v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 101273 (July 3, 1992).
ii. Delegation to the President
iii. Delegation to local governments – CONST. art. X, §§ 2-3.
MMDA v. Bel-Air Village Assoc’n, Inc., G.R. No. 135962 (Mar. 27, 2000).
iv. Delegation of Power to Carry out Defined Policy according to
Prescribed Standards
Osmeña v. Orbos, G.R. No. 99886 (Mar. 31, 1993).
 v. Promulgation of Rules and Regulations
Commissioner of Customs v. Hypermix Feeds Corp., G.R. No. 179579 (Feb. 1, 2012).

(2) Prohibition against Passage of Irrepealable Laws (cf. Parliamentary

Supremacy)
City of Davao v. RTC Branch XII, G.R. No. 127383 (Aug. 18, 2005).
William N. Eskridge, Jr. & John Ferejohn, Super-Statutes, 50 DUKE L.J. 1215, 1215-17,
1231-46, 1264-1276 (2000).
 5. The Legislative Branch (5.1.3 – 5.1.15)
5.1.3. Question Hour – CONST. art. VI, § 22.
5.1.4. Legislative Investigations – CONST. art. VI, § 21.
ASSIGNED [Arnault v. Nazareno, G.R. No. L-3820 (July 18, 1950).]
ASSIGNED Arnault v. Balagtas, G.R. No. 6749 (July 30, 1955).
ASSIGNED Bengzon v. Senate Blue Ribbon Committee, G.R. No. 899
ASSIGNED Senate v. Ermita, G.R. No. 169777 (Apr. 20, 2006).
ASSIGNED Romero v. Estrada, G.R. 174105 (Apr. 2, 2009).
5.1.5. Act as Board of Canvassers (Presidential and Vice-Presid
Elections) – CONST. art. VII, § 4, par. 4.
5.1.6. Call special election for President and Vice-President – CO
VII, § 10.
5.1.7. Revoke or Extend Suspension of Privilege of Habeas Corp
ASSIGNED Declaration of Martial Law – CONST. art. VII, § 18.
5.1.8. Approve Presidential Amnesties – CONST. art. VII, § 19.
5.1.9. Confirm Certain Appointments
oncurring and ASSIGNED Generally: CONST. art. VII, § 18.
ASSIGNED Of the Vice-President: CONST. art. VII, § 9.
ASSIGNED To the Judiciary: CONST. art. VIII, § 9.
ASSIGNED Guingona v. Gonzalez, G.R. No. 106971 (Oct. 20, 1992).
ASSIGNED [Daza v. Singson, G.R. No. 86344 (Dec. 21, 1989).]
.J., dissenting; ASSIGNED [Coseteng v. Mitra, G.R. No. 86649 (July 12, 1990).]
5.1.10. Concur in Treaties – CONST. art. VII, § 21 (through the Se
ASSIGNED Nicolas v. Romulo, G.R. No. 175888 (Feb. 11, 2009).
n of Politics, in 5.1.11. War Powers/Emergency Powers – CONST. art. VI, § 23.
(2nd ed., 2016).] ASSIGNED Paolo S. Tamase, A Framework for Assessing the Legalit
Measures, 93 (Special Online Feature) PHIL. L
5.1.12. Oversight (Legislative Veto)
es, 87 PHIL. ASSIGNED [Over Agencies: ABAKADA Guro Party List v. Purisima, s
ASSIGNED Over Constitutional Commissions: Macalintal v. COMELE
2003) (excerpts).
5.1.13. Judge President’s Fitness – CONST. art. VII, § 11, par. 4.
5.1.14. Power of Impeachment – CONST. art. XI, §§ 2-3.
5.1.15. Constituent Power (Amendment/Revision) – CONST. art.

es, G.R. No.

edural Issues;
W 80-84 (2015).
Confederation of
. No. 21484 (Nov. 29, 1969).

R. No. 169304 (Mar. 13, 2007).

nditions under which the Government may

amended by Pres. Decree No. 1445 (1978))

nds, G.R. No. 11154 (Mar. 21, 1916).]

95) (National Health Insurance Act).]

o) & (p) (2011) (GOCC Governance Act) (for

the Philippines,

(Oct. 12-14, 2005) (3- part

R. No. 185572 (Feb.

97/phl-china-drop-

in Southeast Asia,

and Financing Coalitions

v. Glob. Dev’t Pol’y Ctr.,

ment-chinas-
-malaysia-and-the-

y according to
15, 1215-17,
ST. art. VI, § 21.
L-3820 (July 18, 1950).]
749 (July 30, 1955).
n Committee, G.R. No. 89914 (Nov. 20, 1991).
777 (Apr. 20, 2006).
5 (Apr. 2, 2009).
idential and Vice-Presidential

and Vice-President – CONST. art.

Privilege of Habeas Corpus and

ONST. art. VII, § 18.
– CONST. art. VII, § 19.

art. VII, § 9.

. 106971 (Oct. 20, 1992).

44 (Dec. 21, 1989).]
649 (July 12, 1990).]
VII, § 21 (through the Senate).
5888 (Feb. 11, 2009).
– CONST. art. VI, § 23.
k for Assessing the Legality of COVID-19 Emergency
al Online Feature) PHIL. L.J. 198 (2020).

o Party List v. Purisima, supra.]

ns: Macalintal v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 157013 (July 10,

NST. art. VII, § 11, par. 4.

. art. XI, §§ 2-3.
Revision) – CONST. art. XVII.
Course: Law 100 - Persons & Family Relations
Instructor: Dean Mawis, Ma. Soledad
Email: solmawis@gmail.com

Topic
NCC 13
Legal periods
RAC Sec. 31
Rules of Court (ROC) Rule 22
Applicability of Penal Laws
NCC 14, 17(3), RPC Art. 2
Binding effect
NCC 15
cf.  FC 26

NCC 16 

NCC 17

NCC 18

NCC 31 - 34
 Case
No case assigned
Internal Revenue v Primetown, GR 162155, August 28, 2007
Comr. v Aichi Forging, G.R. No. 184823, October 6, 2010
Del Socorro v Van Wilsem, GR 193707, Dec. 10, 2014
Tenchavez v. Escaño 15 SCRA 355
Board of Commissioners vs. de la Rosa, 197 SCRA 853
Yao Kee v Gonzales, 167 SCRA 736 (1988)
Aznar v Garcia, 7 SCRA 95 (1963)
Amos v Bellis, 20 SCRA 358 (1967)
Tayag v Benguet Consolidated, GR L-23145, Nov. 29, 1968
In the matter of the Petition to Approve the will of Luz Lipson
vs Gaspi,  G.R. No. 229010, November 23, 2020 
No case assigned
Tamano v Ortiz, G.R. No. 126603, June 29, 1998 
Llave vs Republic, GR 169766, March 30, 2011
Villagracia v Sharía, GR 188832, April 23, 2014
No case assigned
Women
Labor
Gender
LGBT rights
Death penalty
Divorce
IPs
Senior Citizens
Out-of-school youth
Sustainability
Environment
Poverty
PWDs
Mental health
Health
Course: Law 99 - Legal Bibliography
Instructor: Sir Bañez, Emerson
Email: esbanez@up.edu.ph
Course: Law - 115 Legal History
Instructor: Atty. Rosales-Sto Domingo, Mary Grace
Email: maanne@imaginelaw.ph ; marygraceannerosales@gmail.com

Assignment for September 17 (Saturday)

Watch K'na, The Dreamweaver (2014) https://youtu.be/Tsw6OpaMtFM

Notes:
From Viber:
Atty. Rosales-Sto. Domingo:
Hi Class! I'm sorry but I will not be able to meet you tomorrow. My travel was unexpectedly extended and I won't have a stable internet connection tomorro
stable internet connection tomorrow. Let's have our first meeting on September 17 instead. To prepare for class, please watch K'na, The Dreamweaver (2014). No submis
The Dreamweaver (2014). No submissions on Saturday. I'll see you all next week. Thanks.