Is the World Mainly Ruled Based on Facts or Based on Opinions?

It is true that the world is affected by a mixture of both factual information and personal viewpoints,
however, world is mainly ruled based on opinions, rather than facts.
Facts are essential in determining how the world functions. They lay the groundwork for comprehending
the world and are used to guide judgment calls in a variety of disciplines, including science, engineering,
medicine, law, and more. People are able to make better judgments and build more stable and just
societies when they rely on truthful information.
On the other hand, opinions also have a big influence on the world and how individuals perceive and
engage with it. Our opinions shape our attitudes, behaviors, and decision-making and are shaped by our
unique beliefs, values, and experiences. Facts may not be as important in areas like politics, economics, or
social issues as opinions. People's attitudes on these issues are frequently shaped by deeply held ideas and
values, and it can be challenging to persuade people to change their minds based only on empirical data.
Opinions have the power to influence governmental decisions, social movements, and public debate.
They can also become disassociated from reality and propagate false information.
Also, opinions influence how we interpret and comprehend facts. Our interpretation of the facts might be
influenced by our personal experiences and prejudices, which can help us generate conclusions that are
consistent with our worldview. This can occasionally result in disputes and conflicts between individuals
as well as between nations, such as those that culminate in war and conflict.
Because we can wish to accept something that supports our worldview or because the facts are
challenging to comprehend or process, our beliefs occasionally are founded on opinions rather than facts.
For instance, it is difficult to fully understand the concept of time, but we nonetheless hold this belief
because it is a fundamental idea. Facts are less important in this situation than opinions.
In conclusion, opinions are a fundamental component of the human experience and can influence how
people see and interact with the world, even while facts are important for making educated decisions and
building a stable and fair society. The world is thus influenced by a combination of both facts and
opinions, but mainly ruled by opinion.

Is Earthquake a 100% Natural and Geological Phenomenon or Other Factors Are Also Involved?
Are There Other Associated Phenomena Before Earthquake Has to Occurred?
The main cause of earthquakes is the unexpected release of energy from the Earth's crust. Earthquakes are
a natural and geological event. However, other factors, such as human activity like mining, drilling, and
the building of big dams, might also cause an earthquake to occur. Seismic activity may result from these
events changing the tensions in the Earth's crust.
There are times when geological occurrences like glacier movements, landslides, and volcanic eruptions
can also cause earthquakes. The rapid tilting or raising of the land surface, changes in groundwater levels,
and the production of radon gas are only a few of the connected phenomena that scientists have seen
before earthquakes. These events, which are thought to be brought on by the crust of the Earth moving,
can act as precursors to upcoming earthquakes.
In addition, there have been accounts of animals acting strangely before earthquakes, such as altering
their vocalizations or movement patterns. It is not yet known, however, whether these behaviors are the
result of some sort of extrasensory ability that enables animals to sense an approaching earthquake or if
they are merely responding to other environmental changes that take place prior to an earthquake, like
changes in air pressure or electromagnetic activity. Further research is required to completely understand
the connection between animal behavior and earthquakes, however some studies have suggested that
some animals, like dogs, may be able to perceive minute changes in the Earth's magnetic field that happen
before to an earthquake.
Although the scientific and geological aspects of earthquakes are fully discovered and understood,
still some people relate earthquakes to some other things like breaking the God’s rules. Do you
agree with these people? Please explain. If you don’t agree with them, what do you have to tell them
to enlighten them?

Some people might think that disobeying God's laws or receiving a penalty for wicked behavior
causes earthquakes. This idea might be predicated on a perception of a connection between
earthquakes and certain events, such as wars or natural disasters, and is frequently founded in
religious or cultural traditions. A test of faith or a manifestation of divine intervention may also be
how some view earthquakes.
However, and, from a scientific standpoint, earthquakes are a result of the tectonic plate movement,
which is a natural occurrence. Many events, including volcanic eruptions, meteorite collisions, and
changes in the Earth's mantle, might cause these motions. There is no evidence to back up the notion
that earthquakes are a result of divine punishment or rule-breaking, despite the fact that they can have
devastating effects on individuals and communities.
Respecting people's religious and cultural views is vital, but it's also critical to recognize the
difference between objective belief and scientific reality. Information on the geological and scientific
origins of earthquakes, as well as the significance of taking necessary safety precautions in
earthquake-prone areas, may be beneficial in enlightening those who may hold such views. An
earthquake has severe, devastating impacts. It causes the destruction of many structures, including
hospitals, schools, and others. Many people suffer fatal and serious injuries. Many people suffer
financial and material losses. It has an impact on people's emotional and mental wellbeing. Surface
faulting, tectonic uplift and subsidence, tsunamis, soil liquefaction, ground resonance, landslides, and
ground failure are all effects of earthquakes that have either a direct relationship to their source or are
sparked by it.

Why do some structures endure and withstand the dynamic force of earthquakes and why others
collapsed?

Several elements, including the design of the structure, the materials used in construction, the caliber
of workmanship, and the location of the structure, affect a structure's ability to survive and withstand
earthquakes. Buildings that are built and engineered to resist earthquake forces are more likely to
survive than those that are not.
The capacity of earthquake-resistant structures to absorb or dissipate seismic energy is a crucial
design element. For instance, structures with flexible frames and shock-absorbing materials, like
rubber or steel, can better absorb an earthquake's energy, putting less strain on the structure and its
parts. Buildings with a robust foundation, such as bedrock, are also more likely to hold up than those
on soft ground, which can magnify the effects of earthquakes.
While building a structure, the caliber of the labor and materials utilized are equally important in
deciding how well it would withstand an earthquake. A building is more likely to survive earthquake
forces if it is built with high-quality materials and is appropriately reinforced, anchored, and braced.
On the other hand, poorly built structures that use subpar materials or methods are more prone to
collapse during an earthquake.
Last but not least, the structure's location is a crucial consideration. Buildings constructed in
seismically active regions or on soil that is loose or soft are more susceptible to failure because they
will shake more intensely during an earthquake. Structures erected in places with stricter building
laws, like Japan and California, are frequently more earthquake-resistant than those built in places
with laxer regulations.
In conclusion, a variety of elements, including a structure's design, the caliber of the construction and
the materials used, as well as its location, affect its ability to withstand earthquakes.

Does time move only forward or it can move backward or ever become stopped?
There is currently no factual evidence to support the idea that time can flow backward or totally stop, and
the idea is still purely theoretical and hypothetical.
Time is viewed as a basic and irreversible component in classical physics. The belief that time only
advances is supported by the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy (a measure of a
system's disorder) constantly grows with time.
It is possible to travel across time and to bend or even reverse time, according to various physics theories,
including the theory of relativity, which suggests that time may be more malleable and subject to
curvature.
The idea of "quantum retro causality," which contends that some particles may be able to travel back in
time for very brief durations, is found in quantum theory. This doesn't imply that time is actually going
backwards, though; rather, it just means that some quantum systems have an odd ability to interact with
the past.
While some of these theoretical ideas raise the possibility of time travel into the past, they also put forth a
number of restrictions and paradoxes that would need to be overcome in order for this kind of travel to be
practical.
Yet, there is no proof to back up the claim that time may be slowed down or reversed on a macroscopic
scale. Our experience of the world is fundamentally shaped by the fact that time in our macroscopic
universe always advances.
Whether time can actually go backward or halt entirely is still a mystery to us at this time, and the idea is
still mostly reserved for science fiction and theoretical physics.
Time, as far as we know, only moves forward. This is a fundamental concept in physics and is often
referred to as the "arrow of time." It means that events occur in a particular order, and that once they have
happened, they cannot be undone. For example, you cannot unscramble an egg, or unbreak a vase.
While the idea of time moving backwards or even becoming stopped is often explored in science fiction,
it is not currently supported by our understanding of the universe. There are theories that suggest time
travel may be possible in some way, but they are speculative and currently unproven.
It's worth noting that time can appear to slow down or speed up depending on the observer's perspective
and the conditions they are in. For example, time can appear to move slower for objects moving at high
speeds or in strong gravitational fields, a phenomenon known as time dilation. However, these effects do
not cause time to move backwards or become stopped.

Quantum theory – where systems could actually move forward and backward in time, for small entropy
changes.